Museum Assessment Program
APPLICATION
Deadline December 1, 2019
Questions? [email protected] or 202.289.9118
The Museum Assessment Program (MAP) is supported by a cooperative agreement between the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and the American Alliance of Museums (AAM).
About the Museum Assessment Program (MAP)
The Museum Assessment Program is a technical assistance program that can help your museum attain excellence in operations and planning through a confidential process of self-study and peer review. MAP is part of the Continuum of Excellence and is administered by the American Alliance of Museums. MAP is supported through a cooperative agreement between the AAM and the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
About the American Alliance of Museums
The American Alliance of Museums has been bringing museums together since 1906, helping to develop standards and best practices, gathering and sharing knowledge, and providing advocacy on issues of concern to the entire museum community. Representing more than 35,000 individual museum professionals and volunteers, institutions, and corporate partners serving the museum field, the Alliance stands for the broad scope of the museum community. For more information, visit: www.aam-us.org.
About the Institute of Museum and
Library Services
The Institute of Museum and Library Services is the primary source of federal support for the nation’s libraries and museums. We advance, support, and empower America’s museums, libraries, and related organizations through grant making, research, and policy development. Our vision is a nation where museums and libraries work together to transform the lives of individuals and communities. To learn more, visit www.imls.gov.
This information collection is being conducted in conformance with the Museum and Library Services Act of 2010, as amended. IMLS intends to make institutional participation information provided through this form publicly available. However, information specifically identifying any individual will be protected from public disclosure to the extent permitted by law.
The OMB control number[NUMBER], expires on [DATE]. The Institute of Museum and Library Services may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Copyright © 2019. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or media or stored by any means in any information storage retrieval system, without prior written permission of the American Alliance of Museums, 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 1005 Arlington, VA 22202.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
About
Museum Assessment Program Overview
What is MAP?
Benefits of MAP
Assessment Types
MAP Process
Commitment
Eligibility
General eligibility
Museums with Parent Organizations
Previous MAPs and Repeating a MAP Assessment
Cost Information
Peer Reviewer Expenses
Number of Peer Reviewers
PART II
Guidelines
Application Guidelines
Application Format
Required Application Materials
Museum Staffing and Hours - Examples
Assembling the Package
Submitting Your Application
Next Steps
Glossary
PART III
Application Form
Museum Assessment Program Application
Evaluation
PART I
What is MAP?
For almost 40 years the Museum Assessment Program (MAP) has helped over 5,000 small and mid-sized museums of all types strengthen and align operations, plan for the future, build capacity, and benchmark themselves against standards. This takes place through a confidential, consultative one-year process of self-assessment, institutional activities, and peer review—including a site visit from an expert peer reviewer. MAP is administered by the American Alliance of Museums (AAM/the Alliance) and supported through a cooperative agreement with the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). This allows AAM to provide museums $4,000 -$6,000 worth of consultative resources and services for a modest fee based on budget size.
In addition the information contained in this document, you can learn more about MAP, including reading case studies and examples of impact from former participants at: https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/museum-assessment-program-map/
Components of MAP
The MAP process consists of submitting an application; completing a self-study workbook and activities; undergoing a site visit; receiving a final report; and documenting immediate and longer-term action steps informed by the report.
Application
To be considered for participation in MAP, your museum must submit an application which collects information on eligibility, institutional capacity, assessment objectives, who will be involved from the institution, and readiness for MAP.
MAP Portal
MAP participants use an online platform to support and guide their progression, step-by-step, through the process. Your institution will move through a series of modules that include narrated presentations, downloadable resources, and required materials.
Self-Study Workbook and Activities
The Self-Study Workbook and Activities are designed to help your institution see itself holistically and prepare the Peer Reviewer for the site visit. This self-assessment aspect of MAP:
stimulates a review of your institution’s policies, procedures, and records
enhances institutional dialogue and openness
informs the peer review phase
encourages new ways of operating
serves as a baseline against which to measure your museum’s progress
Peer Review/Site Visit
Each MAP assessment includes a site visit by a Peer Reviewer who is a museum professional volunteering his/her time and experience/expertise to help your institution. They review your museum’s application and self-study materials; visit the museum for a 1 to 2-1/2 day site visit, and provide the museum with a report of findings and recommendations. Your stated MAP objectives help focus the Peer Reviewer’s visit and report. Peer review provides:
the opportunity for a collegial critique of your operations from an external, fresh perspective
validation and input from an experienced museum professional
consultative advice to help your museum improve
Implementation Planning
Museums receive and discuss the final report from their Peer Reviewer then use it to create plans and take action to implement the recommendations. MAP will give you the tools and motivation to continue with next steps.
Evaluation
As part of their participation in MAP, institutions must provide feedback about the materials and process, as well as report on individual results and benefits, periodically throughout the process and at its conclusion.
Benefits of MAP
Museums emerge from MAP with:
greater alignment of activities, mission, and resources
analysis of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities
prioritized roadmap for improving operations and meeting standards
practices benchmarked to standards
enhanced credibility with potential funders and donors
improved communications between staff, board, and other constituents
expert advice, recommendations, and resources
increased capacity for strategic planning
After participating in MAP, museums:
say the changes made as a result of MAP positively impacted visitor experience and/or community response to their museum
create or update at least one museum policy
are better prepared to go through Accreditation
credit MAP for their success in fundraising
For case studies and data visit https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/impact/.
Assessment Types
There are five different MAP assessment types to choose from: Organizational, Collections Stewardship, Community/Audience Engagement, Board Leadership, and Education. Listed below for each assessment you will find: a description of scope and purpose; what is required to participate (in addition to the general eligibility requirements for MAP); recommendations on what you should already have in place in order to participate successfully; and examples of how it can help your museum.
Aspects common to all assessments:
Grounded in the Core Standards
Include Diversity, Equity, Access, and Inclusion (DEAI) issues as related to the particular assessment’s focus
Help museums look at both functional and strategic aspects of their operations
If you need more guidance on which assessment is best for your institution, visit the following webpage or contact the MAP staff: https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/map-assessment-types/.
Organizational Assessment
Purpose and Scope:
This basic strategic and holistic assessment helps a museum look at its operations primarily from the perspective of how well activities, resources, and mission align with each other, and with professional ethics, practices, and standards. To help a museum have a solid foundation to build on for long-term health and impact, this assessment places significant emphasis on thinking, acting, and planning strategically; organizational alignment, capacity; leadership and organizational structure; risk management; and organizational culture. This assessment assists museums define key areas of operations or functions that need to be strengthened.
Mission
Strategic planning
Organizational life cycle
Financial resource allocation, development
Legal compliance, public disclosure, accountability
Ethics, transparency and openness
Governance (structure, composition, function, role)
Staff (roles, capacity)
Security, Safety, and Emergency Planning
Operational ecosystem (community make-up and needs)
Facilities
DEAI issues: board/staff diversity, compensation equity
Eligibility and Readiness:
See the main Eligibility section below.
Benefits:
This assessment may increase staff and/or governing authority’s knowledge about aspects of the museum, including but not limited to:
the respective roles and responsibilities of governing authority and staff
museum standards and best practices
resources available to help the museum
It can improve alignment of operations to mission, resources to mission, and organizational structure to mission. This assessment will also bring up topics like governing authority and staff diversity as well as compensation equity.
And it may improve the institution’s ability to develop or refine its mission statement and develop an institutional plan and other core policies. It can also help a museum assess facilities management needs or risks and offer tools and ideas to improve financial sustainability, collections care, and community engagement. Note that the Organizational Assessment does not offer a deep dive in to these latter two areas; see the other assessments described below for a more focused review.
And finally, it can be a step in preparation for core document verification, accreditation or reaccreditation.
Collections Stewardship Assessment
Purpose and Scope:
This assessment focuses on practical, ethical, and strategic collections issues and activities related to the care and management of a museum’s collections per professional practices and standards. It also looks at the collections within the context of the museum’s total operations, plans, and resource allocation. The results will help the museum—governing authority and staff—increase its knowledge, recognize and mitigate risk, take action, prioritize long-term collections stewardship issues, gain physical and intellectual control of the collections, and write polices and plans. This assessment will also include topics such as stewardship of and access to sacred and culturally sensitive objects; and decolonization of taxonomies.
Acquisitions & accessioning
Deaccessioning & disposal
Loans
Ethical, cultural, and legal issues
Environmental monitoring and control
Storage, movement
Conservation and preservation
Documentation and inventory
Emergency planning
Collections planning
Alignment of collections, resources, and mission
Staffing, training, and resource allocation
Eligibility and Readiness:
In addition to the main eligibility requirement for MAP, your institution MUST have:
A formal and approved mission statement which has been recently reviewed.
MAP staff also strongly recommends that the museum has:
A collections management policy already, at least in draft, before applying for this assessment. This recommendation is based on feedback from Peer Reviewers, who find that they can be of greatest help to the museum if there is a policy or draft policy on which they can comment.
Benefits:
This assessment can help increase staff and/or governing authority’s knowledge about collections standards and best practices. It can assist in improving alignment of collections with mission and your museum’s institutional plan.
It may improve the museum’s ability to write a collections plan and develop/review/revise collections management policies and procedures. It may improve your museum’s ability to raise funds to support the collections, prioritize long-term collections management issues, manage risk, and overall improve collections stewardship.
This assessment can also assist in reviewing the institutional needs in the areas of collections management staffing and facilities management.
And finally, it can be a step in preparation for core document verification, accreditation or reaccreditation.
Community and Audience Engagement Assessment
Purpose and Scope:
This assessment focuses on the museum’s awareness and understanding of, and relationship with, its various communities and audiences; and their perception of, and experience with, the museum. It looks at what roles the museum plays in its community and vice versa. And it helps the museum look at its culture and actions when it comes to diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion—all of which impact its long-term financial sustainability. A Community and Audience Engagement assessment helps museums gather better input from their constituents, develop a more nuanced view about the community’s and audiences’ demographics and needs, respond to the changing nature of its audiences, and incorporate these findings into planning and operational decisions.
What your community knows and thinks about the museum
What you know about your community and how
Who comes to/engages with your museum and why/why not, and how you know
How/what data you gather
Barriers to reaching your target audiences
DEAI issues: How do you reflect your community; what are the opportunities for community engagement/voice with the museum (board service, a voice in programming, etc.); do messaging, branding, and other outward facing activities inclusive, equitable, and accessible?
Plans and policies
Strategic partnerships/relationships
The visitor experience / visitor services
Allocation of organizational resources
Eligibility and Readiness:
In addition to the main eligibility requirement for MAP, your institution MUST have:
A formal and approved mission statement which has been recently reviewed.
MAP staff also strongly recommends that the museum have:
Someone on its internal Assessment Team with experience with self-assessment and/or working on projects that involve outside stakeholders. This will be of benefit when it comes to managing the assessment logistics, which need to involve members of your museum’s community and audiences.
An established process for institutional/strategic planning
In addition, prior completion of an Organizational Assessment is encouraged but not required.
Benefits:
This assessment can increase the staff and leadership’s understanding of the needs of the museum’s community(ies) and stakeholders, as well as how the museum is perceived by its audiences and community. It can improve the alignment of mission with audience and community, and incorporate community needs into long-range plans.
It may help your museum identify and develop:
potential audiences
create collaborations to address community needs
design audience evaluation plans
improve visitor services
align audience needs with exhibitions and programming
write/review/revise policies and procedures
develop a long-range interpretive plan
And finally, it can be a step in preparation for Core Documents Verification, Accreditation or Reaccreditation.
Board Leadership Assessment
Purpose and Scope:
This advanced assessment is for private non-profit museums with boards that are primarily strategically focused rather than operationally focused (i.e., members do not function as staff) that are looking for guidance on how to strengthen their institution and ensure its long-term success through more effective leadership-oriented governance. The assessment looks at the board from three perspectives—people, work, culture—and helps them identify opportunities to move the museum beyond surviving to thriving. It also helps strengthen the board’s understanding of museum ethics and standards.
People: Board Composition and Structure
Who’s on the board and who’s not; diversity, skills, connection to/reflection of community
Recruitment and orientation
Succession planning (board and director)
Work: Board Responsibilities
Advocacy (monitoring and engaging in public policy)
Advancing institutional diversity and inclusion
Raising money and financial oversight
Strategic planning
Performance and evaluation
Culture: Leadership and Board Dynamics
Accountability and ethics
Board-Director relationship
Museum Core Standards and ethics
Eligibility and Readiness:
The Board Leadership Assessment is primarily designed for standalone museums that are 501(c)(3)s—organizations with boards that operate autonomously and have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization. However, if the museum is part of a larger parent organization whose board functions as the museum’s board; or if the museum is a public-private partnership, contact the MAP staff to discuss, as the program will consider these on case-by-case basis.
Advisory boards are not eligible to participate in the Board Leadership Assessment.
In addition to the main eligibility requirement for MAP, your institution MUST have:
A formal and approved mission statement which has been recently reviewed.
Bylaws
A paid director (regardless of title, this is someone that functions as the chief executive officer—the highest ranking member of staff that reports to the governing authority)
Also, your museum’s board MUST be:
Active and aware of the involved role they will be playing in this assessment, both on the Assessment Team and during the site visit
Willing to look internally at their roles and responsibilities and commit to progressing through this assessment with transparency and honesty
Willing to be self-reflective and make changes
MAP staff also strongly recommends that your institution:
have done a MAP Organizational Assessment, or something similar that provided the museum with external review of its operations
speak with the MAP staff about interest in this assessment before applying
Benefits
This assessment will help the board fully embrace and advance its strategic roles and responsibilities so it can effectively lead the institution and ensure its long-term relevance and sustainability. This includes helping the board set a culture and practice of inclusion for itself and the museum’s actions and activities. It can improve communication and collaboration between the board and director, other board members, and key stakeholders; help the museum align its board composition to the needs of the organization and the community; and address competing or under-developed advocacy, governance, and fundraising roles.
Education Assessment
Purpose and Scope:
This assessment helps a museum evaluate how well it is carrying out its educational role and mission, and meeting core standards for education and interpretation. In addition to looking at the museum’s current content delivery vehicles such as its exhibitions, tours, and programs, the Education Assessment considers these in context with the museum’s community, audiences, and other aspects of operations so the museum can be a responsive, relevant, and trusted source of learning and educational partner in its larger education ecosystem. The assessment also looks at the museum’s educational content creation and delivery from the perspective of diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion.
How educational content is planned, informed, created, delivered, and evaluated
Plans and policies
Who is involved internally and externally
Delivery formats (exhibits, programs, tours, off site school visits, etc.)
Goals, success measures, impact
Alignment between educational programs, collections, exhibitions, and mission
Community and audiences: composition and needs; what do you know about them and how; alignment with them and your educational deliverables
Partnerships and work with local educational ecosystem / how the museum is seen and used as an educational resource
DEAI issues: physical and intellectual accessibility; inclusion of diverse voices—who has a voice in your museum's interpretation/content and what voices are you choosing to amplify or share? What story are you telling?
Organizational resources devoted to carrying out educational role (money, people, facilities, collection
Eligibility and Readiness
In addition to the main eligibility requirement for MAP, your institution MUST have:
A formal and approved mission statement which has been recently reviewed
Staff position(s) (paid or unpaid) dedicated to education, interpretation and exhibits; these roles can be separate or combined into one or more positions
Benefits:
Museums that complete this assessment will see improved engagement and collaboration between education-related staff and collections staff (and/or volunteers), and alignment of educational activities and the museum’s mission. It builds the museum’s capacity and toolkit to enhance visitor experience and improve audience engagement, including as related to diversity, accessibility, and inclusion. Museums will also gain a deeper understanding of the larger educational ecosystem in their community; and it can help align educational concepts such as learning styles and developmental stages, with deliverables.
This assessment can also help your museum:
Align programs and events to target audiences
Improve interaction and engagement
Design educational materials (such as gallery activities, lesson plans, exhibit guides or teacher resources)
Develop an Interpretation Plan
Support training for front line staff and volunteers
Design program evaluation strategies
Analyze the current inclusion of diverse voices
And finally, it can be a step in preparation for Core Documents Verification, Accreditation, or Reaccreditation.
MAP Process Schedule
The following is an overview of the main pieces of the MAP process. If your museum is accepted into MAP, you will receive more details and reminders about each subsequent step.
Quarter 1
Ensure eligibility
Secure institutional commitment
Pick an assessment type
Select objectives
Form your internal Assessment Team
Complete and submit the application
Receive notification of acceptance
Sign and return acceptance form, agreeing to terms and conditions
Access the MAP Portal
Pay fee
Begin the Self-Study Workbook and Activities
Quarter 2
Continue working in the MAP Portal
Work with MAP staff on Peer Reviewer assignment
Work on the Self-Study Workbook and Activities
Contact the Peer Reviewer to schedule site visit and develop visit agenda
Inform MAP staff of site visit date
Quarters 3-4
Provide completed Self-Study Workbook and Activity summaries to MAP office and Peer Reviewer
Compile and provide additional documentation to Peer Reviewer
Continue working in the MAP Portal
Site visit
Receive peer reviewer’s report 8-10 weeks after visit
Complete work in the MAP Portal
Begin/plan for implementing recommendations from the Peer Reviewer’s report
Integrate them into your museum’s plans
Follow-up with the Peer Reviewer with any questions and for recommendation clarification
Submit final MAP process summary form and evaluation tool
Commitment
For your museum to get the most benefit from MAP, the process needs to be an institutional priority.
Committing to MAP includes:
meeting deadlines
involving the staff and governing authority for the duration of the process
engaging the museum’s internal and external communities
evaluating the process
being transparent, communicative, and candid with each other, the MAP staff, and the Peer Reviewer
Key paid and unpaid staff, members of your governing authority, and other important constituencies should be involved the MAP process. There are a few special roles.
The Assessment Team
The Assessment Team is a critical part of the MAP process. This internal team leads the MAP process at the museum and is accountable for completion and compliance. It is responsible for doing for the bulk of the work to complete materials and the modules in the MAP Portal. It is responsible for conducting the assessment and integrating it into the museum’s planning and implementation process. Members of the team can change if needed during the MAP process. Being on the Team involves a significant time commitment (see chart on next page).
Who should be on this team? People with the:
knowledge about how things really work or don’t work at your organization, about what resources are available, about how to get things done
authority to hold others accountable for tasks
authority for making decisions about policies or procedures
responsibility for implementing decisions arising from the assessment and subsequent planning
The number of people on your Assessment Team is up to you. But remember to keep it manageable.
Consider who on the Assessment Team should be the Primary Contact—this person functions as the Assessment Team leader and main connection point with the MAP staff. It may be a member of your governing authority, the director, or another staff member with appropriate skills to lead a team and manage a project. Generally we do not recommend having the development director, grant writer, a consultant, or an intern serve as the Primary Contact. Notify MAP staff if any Assessment Team members change during the process.
A copy of your final report will be shared with all people listed below as your institution’s assessment team (or their replacements).
For a full summary of the various roles at your institution, and their related responsibilities and time commitment, see the chart on the next page.
Evaluation and Reporting
Completing evaluations about specific parts of the process, materials, and the MAP experience overall is part of your museum’s commitment to MAP. Your museum will be asked to return evaluations at various stages of the MAP process. Not only will your comments help AAM improve MAP for future users, but your feedback is required as a part of MAP’s obligation to IMLS. We also welcome your comments and observations at any point during the assessment, outside of the formal evaluation/survey instruments.
Sometimes museums need to withdraw themselves from the Museum Assessment Program due to unforeseen circumstances that impact the availability and capacity of the of staff and/or governing authority to see the process through to completion.
Sometimes the AAM staff will withdraw a museum because it is not moving forward in the program or complying with program requirements. Your institution’s participation in MAP—including but not limited to the AAM staff support, materials, and Peer Reviewer—are made possible by federal funds issued to the American Alliance of Museums from the Institute of Museum and Library Services—a federal agency. As such, AAM must ensure that this money is used appropriately.
MAP fees are nonrefundable but withdrawing from the program will not impact your standing with AAM or other excellence programs and will not impact your ability to apply for MAP or other AAM programs in the future.
MAP Role |
Time Commitment |
Obligations
|
Primary Contact
Select either:
|
|
|
Assessment Team Member
May include:
|
|
|
Other Museum Stakeholder (Non-Assessment Team Member)
May include:
|
|
|
*Directors must be on the MAP Assessment Team for both Organizational and Board Leadership Assessments.
**Members of the governing authority are expected to be available for site visit (other arrangements can be made if unavailable during site visit dates) even if they are not on the MAP Assessment Team for both Organizational and Board Leadership Assessments.
ELIGIBILITY
Words in bold and italicized appear in the glossary.
Eligible institutions include aquariums, art museums, children/youth museums, general museums, historic houses/sites, history museums, natural history/anthropology museums, nature centers, planetariums, public gardens, science/technology museums, specialized museums and zoos.
The following eligibility criteria apply to all applicants, regardless of which assessment is selected.
The applicant museum must:
be organized on a permanent basis for essentially educational or aesthetic purposes;
care for, and own or use, tangible objects, whether animate or inanimate, and make them available to the general public through exhibition and/or research on a regular basis at facilities it owns or operates
be a unit of state local, or tribal government; or a private nonprofit organization with tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code.
have at least one professional staff member or the full-time equivalent, whether paid or unpaid, whose responsibilities relate solely to the museum’s operations
be open and providing museum services to the general public on a regular basis (a museum that exhibits objects to the general public for at least 90 days a year fulfills this requirement). If a museum is not scheduled to be open to the public 90 days a year, it is still eligible to participate in MAP if it can demonstrate that it was open at least 90 days in the preceding year through a combination of scheduled days open and days open by appointment; travelling exhibits, digital exhibits and access to online collections may also be considered.
be located in one of the fifty states of the U.S., the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, or the Republic of Palau; and
not be operated by the U.S. federal government. (If your museum is a federal institution, contact the MAP staff to discuss how it can still participate in MAP on a fee-for-service basis.)
In addition to these main criteria, also see assessment-specific eligibility requirements stated earlier.
Museums with Parent Organizations
Museums that operate within a non-federal parent organization are eligible to apply and participate in MAP. A museum operated within a multi-purpose public or private nonprofit organization such as a municipality, university, historical society, foundation, or cultural center may apply on its own behalf if it:
is able to independently fulfill all the requirements for eligibility listed above
is an identifiably discrete unit within the parent organization
has the authority to function and operate autonomously within the parent organization
When any of the eligibility criteria cannot be met, a museum may apply through its eligible parent organization, and the parent organization may apply(s) for one or more of its museums.
Museums that previously completed an IMLS-funded MAP assessment are eligible to participate again in the same type of assessment if seven years have passed since the original assessment. There is no waiting period to do a different assessment All applicants that have previously completed a MAP must explain in the application their accomplishments/progress since the last assessment, especially as related to the recommendations received and why they are seeking another one. If you are unsure if your institution has gone through MAP before, please check the AAM website or contact [email protected] directly.
Participation Fee
Through a Cooperative Agreement with IMLS, AAM is able to offer MAP assessments at a modest cost to your institution in relation to its budget. Use the table below to determine your museum’s costs based on your institution’s operating expenses. Your museum will be invoiced for its participation fee after it is accepted into MAP. Fees are paid to AAM and they are non-refundable.
Museum Annual Operating Expenses |
Participation Costs |
$125,000 or less |
$300 |
$125,001-$400,000 |
$500 |
$400,001-$1 Million |
$700 |
$1.1 Million-$5 Million |
$1000 |
Greater than $5 Million |
$1500 |
Other possible costs you should consider budgeting for:
Add an additional Peer Reviewer (optional, see details below): $1,650 fee
Expenses associated with conducting any MAP Activities
Costs associated with food or beverage the museum provides when the Peer Reviewer(s) is on-site
Postage, copying, printing, supplies, telephone/internet charges
What You Get
Your MAP participation includes the following materials and services, valued at approximately $4,000 -$6,000*:
MAP Self-Study Materials: Workbook & Activities
Access to an online MAP Portal with customized presentations, activities, and resources to help you through each step of the MAP experience
Assessment Report: a written report of the Peer Reviewer’s findings and recommendations, with prioritized next steps and resources
The time, expertise, and travel expenses (transportation, meals, incidentals, lodging) for one Peer Reviewer to visit your museum for one to three days to offer guidance and consultation on site
Peer Reviewer’s honorarium
A dedicated MAP Program Officer for support, guidance, and feedback
*Please note: Your museum’s MAP participation is IMLS funded but is not a grant given to your institution. AAM receives grant funding from IMLS to deliver this comprehensive program and service to your museum. AAM does not disperse any money to your museum.
Peer Reviewers are reimbursed by AAM for their site visit expenses. Peer Reviewers generally make and pay upfront for their own travel arrangements. We encourage museums to work closely with Peer Reviewers to provide suggestions on where to stay, etc. If the museum directly pays for any allowable expense on behalf of the Peer Reviewer (e.g., hotel), the museum can seek reimbursement from AAM. Museums will be provided more details on site visit expenses once the MAP process begins.
Each museum receives one Peer Reviewer to conduct its site visit and write an assessment report.
If your museum would like two Peer Reviewers for its site visit, there is an additional fee of $1,650 to cover travel expenses, honorarium, and additional logistics. The two Peer Reviewers will conduct the site visit as a team and produce a single report for you.
Do I need an additional Peer Reviewer?
Large, complex museums, museums with multiple sites, and/or museums with multiple disciplines may want to consider having a two-person Peer Review team. Benefits of having more than one Peer Reviewer include:
Multiple perspectives on complex situations
Ability to meet with more staff and governing authority members face-to-face because Peer Reviewers can split up the duties
Peer Reviewers with different areas of expertise can concentrate their focus on those areas, matching their expertise to the needs of the participating museum
Museums preparing for accreditation or reaccreditation may benefit from multiple perspectives
If MAP staff determine it is unreasonable for one person to handle the visit solo due to the museum’s size or complexity, they may require you have an additional Peer Reviewer.
Talk to the MAP staff before you submit your application if you want guidance on this matter.
PART II
APPLICATION GUIDELINES
Application Format
The application is submitted through an online system where you will answer questions and upload documents. Applications submitted by email or sent in hard copy will not be considered.
For the online application link and full technical instructions visit: https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/apply-to-the-museum-assessment-program/
Required Application Materials
Organizations must provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. Organizations can receive a DUNS number at no cost by calling the toll-free request line at 1-800-526-9018 or by visiting www.dnb.com.
A TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number) or EIN (Employer Identification Number) is a nine-digit number that the internal Revenue Service (IRS) assigns to business entities. The IRS uses this number to identify taxpayers who are required to file various business tax returns. This is a free service offered by the IRS and you can get your EIN immediately. To apply go to https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/apply-for-an-employer-identification-number-ein-online.
If your organization is incorporated as a nonprofit, you must submit a copy of your Federal IRS letter indicating your organization’s eligibility for nonprofit status under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. A letter of state sales tax exemption is not accepted as proof of nonprofit status.
The chart should include, as applicable, the museum’s parent organization, governing authority, partner organizations, advisory boards, supporting organizations, staff, and volunteers; and show the relationships between them.
Brochure or Rack Card (or other publicly available promotional piece)
If your organization operates as part of a unit of state or local government or other tax-exempt multipurpose organization such as a university or foundation, you must submit official documentation from the parent identifying the museum as such and supporting its participation in MAP. This certification must be on the parent organization’s letterhead, refer to the relationship between the parent organization and the applicant, and be signed by an official of the parent organization. This can be as simple as:
The XYZ MUSEUM is owned and operated by the ABC PARENT ORGANIZATION. We support the XYZ MUSEUM’s participation in the Museum Assessment Program.
Signature Page
Two signatures are required on the application: the director and the head of the governing authority. If there is no museum director or the head of the governing authority fills this role, the head of the governing authority and a second person from the governing authority must also sign.
Museum Hours and Staffing - Examples
To show your museum’s eligibility for MAP, in the application you must fill in charts with information about its hours of operation and staffing, as shown in the examples below:
Sample Museum Schedule
Date to Date
|
example |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
|
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
1/15-3/15
|
|
|
|
1- 5pm |
|
1- 5pm |
1- 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
3/15-9/15
|
1 - 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
|
1 - 5pm |
1 – 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
9/16 to 1/14 |
|
|
|
1 - 5pm |
|
1 - 5pm |
1 – 5pm |
1 - 5pm |
If your museum does not have regularly scheduled hours, or if the regular hours does not equal 90 days, please list additional dates that the museum was open outside the normal operating schedule and the reason the museum was open.
Example:
April 7 – Girl Scout troop visit
April 15 – Homeschool tour
April 17 – Retirement center tour
April 25 – Oct 25 – Traveling exhibit
Sample Staffing
Name: Martin Free_ Title: Site Manager X volunteer paid
|
||||||||
Responsibilities: Responsible for daily oversight of the museum, collections management, educational programming, and fund raising. Job description attached. |
||||||||
Hours per week: |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
example |
Total |
(fill in work hours for each day and total for week) |
0 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
36 |
Only include one person per position. If your museum has multiple people fulfilling the same functional role, list each person’s hours separately.
Job Descriptions
Include a job description for each position you list. If your museum does not have formal job descriptions for all or some of the positions then include a more-than-cursory summary of roles and responsibilities in the chart.
Submitting the Application
Before submitting your application, be certain all information entered is complete and accurate, and the following items have been uploaded:
Signature Page
Proof of Nonprofit Status
Signed Parent Letter (if applicable)
Job descriptions for staff (where available)
Promotional piece such as a brochure or rack card (scan)
Organizational chart
For the online application link and full technical instructions visit https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/apply-to-the-museum-assessment-program/.
You are strongly encouraged to submit your application well before the deadline. There is a fixed number of participants that the program can accept each year. Once the limit is reached, applications will continue to be accepted but the museum will be put on a waiting list and the application moved into the pool to be considered if a spot becomes available .
For questions about the application contact the Museum Assessment Program staff at (202) 289-9118 or [email protected].
MAP staff may need to contact you with questions about your application. Delayed responses to staff inquires may jeopardize your eligibility or consideration for MAP.
MAP staff will process the museum’s application and notify the Primary Contact about the acceptance status approximately 30-45 days after the application deadline. If accepted, MAP staff will e-mail an acceptance letter, which you will be required to sign and return in approximately two weeks. Participation fees will be invoiced shortly after acceptance. Payment is required within 30 days of the date of the invoice.
Accessibility: Giving equitable access to everyone along the continuum of human ability and experience. Accessibility encompasses the broader meanings of compliance and refers to how organizations make space for the characteristics that each person brings.*
Professional Practices: A professional practice [aka best practice] is generally accepted in the field as a reliable method or technique for achieving a desired result.
Diversity: All the ways that people are different and the same at the individual and group levels. Even when people appear the same, they are different. Organizational diversity requires examining and questioning the makeup of a group to ensure that multiple perspectives are represented. *
Equity: The fair and just treatment of all members of a community. Equity requires commitment to strategic priorities, resources, respect, and civility, as well as ongoing action and assessment of progress toward achieving specific goals.*
Dual governance: A governance structure in which two separate legal entities share governance of the museum. This involves dividing or sharing basic governance responsibilities such as determining mission and purpose; hiring, supporting, and evaluating the director; strategic planning; obtaining and managing resources; and monitoring the organization's programs and services. For example: a museum jointly governed by a city government, which owns the collections and the building and hires the staff, and a private nonprofit, which determines museum policy and operates the museum. Does not automatically include museums that have separately incorporated friends organizations, unless the friends organization has significant responsibility for governance of the museum.
Inclusion: The intentional, ongoing effort to ensure that diverse individuals fully participate in all aspects of organizational work, including decision-making processes. It also refers to the ways that diverse participants are valued as respected members of an organization and/ or community. While a truly “inclusive” group is necessarily diverse, a “diverse” group may or may not be “inclusive.”.*
General museum: A museum that addresses two or more disciplines to a significant extent; for example, a museum that interprets both art and history, or both history and science.
Governing Authority: The body with legal and fiduciary responsibility for the museum and for approving museum policy (e.g., Board of Commissioners, Board of Directors, Board of Managers, Board of Regents, Board of Trustees, City Council, Commission).
Governing Authority: The executive body to which the director reports/is responsible. It is charged with the fiduciary responsibility for the museum and for approving museum policy.
Names of Governing Authority include: Advisory Council, Board of Commissioners, Board of Directors, Board of Managers, Board of Regents, Board of Trustees, City Council, Commission.
Head of Governing Authority: The elected or appointed head of the executive body (governing authority) to which the director reports. For institutions that are part of a larger non-museum parent organization, the head of governing authority is considered to be the individual within the institution’s larger parent organization to whom the director reports/is responsible (e.g., dean or provost of a university, director of parks and recreation for a city government, military post commander, etc.)
Museum system: Two or more museums or museum facilities that share a common parent organization. The component parts of a museum system may be museums operating independently or quasi-independently with distinct budgets and governing authorities, or may simply be separate, distinguishable sites all managed by the same organization.
Operating income and expenses: Income generated by or expenditures supporting the museum’s general operations in a given fiscal year, including exhibitions, education, conservation, collections management, collections acquisitions, research, training, development, and administration. Includes any portion of income from the endowment that is applied to operating expenses in a given year. Does not include capital expenditures.
Parent organization: A larger organization within which a museum operates. Examples of parent organizations are: colleges or universities; tribal, municipal, state, or federal government; state historical societies supervising multiple sites; corporate foundation, etc.
Specialized museum: A museum that does not fall into or combine any of the other discipline areas listed in question 14 of the application—for example, a quilt museum, clock museum, and stamp museum.
Standard: Generally accepted level of attainment for use as a basis of comparison in measuring or judging performance.
Tangible objects: Any three-dimensional objects that are used in any way at the museum. Collections managed by virtual museums are not considered to be tangible objects.
*From Facing Change: Insights from the American Alliance of Museums’ Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Inclusion Working Group Report, 2018
PART III
MUSEUM ASSESSMENT PROGRAM APPLICATION
INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION
Museum Name:
Alternate Name (if any):
Previous Name (if any):
Name of parent organization or friends group applying for this organization, if applicable:
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Physical Address (if different):
City: State: Zip:
Telephone: Fax: Web Address: E-mail:
DUNS Number: TIN (EIN) Number:
(see page 12 for descriptions)
Congressional district:
(If you do not know your museum’s district, go to www.house.gov and enter your zip code)
MAP ASSESSMENT TYPE (see Part I for descriptions) (Check only one)
|
Organizational |
|
Collections Stewardship |
|
Community & Audience Engagement |
|
Board Leadership |
|
Education |
|
|
NUMBER OF PEER REVIEWERS (see Part I for more details)
|
One (included) |
|
Two (Additional cost) |
MAP OBJECTIVES
State up to three objectives that will inform your MAP review, particularly the Peer Review aspect. Objectives can be changed during the process if needed but changes must be communicated with MAP staff and your Peer Reviewer.
How do you hope your MAP participation will improve your institution’s current situation and address challenges? (limit 500 words)
List up to three objectives your museum would most like this MAP assessment to accomplish and why. Please be succinct but specific. These
a)
b)
c)
MAP ASSESSMENT TEAM
Your MAP Assessment Team must contain at least four active members.
List all members of your Assessment Team. Please indicate which person is your Primary Contact by placing a “1” in the “#” column. Indicate which person is your Secondary Contact by placing a “2” in the “#” column. If necessary, your museum can have up to two Primary Contacts. Please note that the Primary Contact must be regularly accessible by email, as this is the primary method for all communications from the MAP staff.
A copy of your final report will be shared with all people listed below as your institution’s assessment team.
# |
Full Name (include prefix) |
Title |
Phone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELIGIBILITY
The following questions are designed to determine your museum’s eligibility to participate in the Museum Assessment Program. If you are uncertain or have questions, please contact MAP staff to discuss. Note: If your organization is governed by a parent institution, all answers should refer to your museum only.
Is the museum organized as a public or private nonprofit or as a unit of state or local government institution that exists on a permanent basis for essentially educational or aesthetic purposes?
|
Yes |
|
No Explain: |
Does the museum own, use, or care for tangible objects, whether animate or inanimate?
|
Yes |
|
No Explain: |
Are these objects exhibited to the public on a regular basis through facilities the museum owns or operates?
|
Yes |
|
No |
Is the museum open and exhibiting to the public at least 90 days a year?
|
Yes |
|
No |
Total number of days the museum was open to the public for the 12-month period prior to application: _ _ days
If your museum is not regularly open 90 days a year, please list additional dates that the museum was open outside the normal operating schedule and the reason the museum was open. Feel free to attach on a separate sheet, if needed.
List below the museum’s schedule each day of the week. See Part II for more information and sample.
Date to Date |
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the museum have at least one full-time1 (paid or unpaid) staff member or the equivalent2, whose primary duty includes the governance, administration, programming, and collections management of the museum?
|
Yes |
|
No Explain: |
How many people (paid or unpaid) work at the museum?
|
Total number of full-time paid staff |
|
Total number of part-time3 paid staff |
|
Total number of full-time unpaid staff |
|
Total number of part-time unpaid staff |
Does your organization have a director? (This person’s title may vary, e.g., director, president, CEO, Museum or Site Administrator, etc.)
|
Yes |
|
No |
If yes, is the director of the museum full-time?
|
Yes |
|
No |
Director’s Name: |
______volunteer |
______ paid |
|||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List up to five positions, other than the director, responsible for your museum’s activities and the average number of hours per week each one works. See Part II for more information.
Name: |
Title: |
_____volunteer |
_____paid |
||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Title: |
_____volunteer |
_____paid |
||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Title: |
_____volunteer |
_____paid |
||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Title: |
_____volunteer |
_____paid |
||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Title: |
_____volunteer |
_____paid |
||||||
Responsibilities (Attach formal Position Description if available): |
|||||||||
Hours per week (fill in work hours and total for week) |
|||||||||
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thurs |
Fri |
Sat |
Sun |
Total |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Note: These questions do not relate to eligibility. Answers to these questions help us learn more about your organization and match your organization with an appropriate Peer Reviewer.
Revenue and Expenses
Previous Fiscal Years |
Operating Income |
Operating Expenses |
Most recently completed FY 20 |
$ |
$ |
Second most recently completed FY 20 |
$ |
$ |
If you have a parent institution, please make sure you are listing only your museum’s information and not that of the parent entity.
Does your museum have an itemized budget?
Yes
No
If you have a parent entity, check any of the following resources/services which your parent entity provides for your museum:
Staffing/Benefits
Building/Grounds Maintenance or Utilities
Marketing/PR/Development
Other:
What are the museum’s financial or fundraising priorities for the next three to five years? Check all that apply.
Strategic
Building operating endowment |
Build other endowment |
Capital campaign |
Increase cash reserves |
Increase earned income |
Reduce/eliminate debt |
Strengthen overall financial health and stability |
Other |
Operational
Collections/storage projects |
Facilities expansions, upgrades or repairs |
Staffing needs |
Technology projects |
Raise funds for other special project or need |
Other |
If any boxes are checked above, please comment on each briefly:
a. What is your museum’s mission?
b. Is your museum’s mission statement formally approved by your governing authority?
|
Yes |
|
No |
c. If yes, what is the date it was originally adopted?
d. When was it last reviewed?
Organization Type (select up to three)
|
Aquarium |
|
Anthropology Museum |
|
Arboretum/Botanical Garden/Public Garden |
|
Art Museum/Center/Sculpture Garden |
|
Children’s or Youth Museum |
|
Ethnically/Culturally/Tribally Specific Museum (List: ) |
|
General or Multi-Disciplinary (several subjects) |
|
Hall of Fame |
|
Historic House |
|
Historic Site/Landscape |
|
History Museum |
|
Historical Society |
|
Military Museum/Battlefield |
|
Nature Center |
|
Natural History Museum |
|
Planetarium |
|
Presidential Library |
|
Science/Technology Center/Museum |
|
Specialized
museum (a museum with collections limited to one narrowly
defined topic—e.g., textiles, stamps, a specific cultural
or ethnic group) |
|
|
|
Transportation (air/space, maritime, automobiles, etc.): |
|
Visitor Center/Interpretive Center |
|
Zoo/Animal Parks Other: |
Does your museum have a parent organization?
Parent organization: a larger organization within which a museum operates. Examples of parent organizations are: colleges or universities; tribal, municipal, state, or federal government; state historical societies supervising multiple sites; corporate foundation, etc.
|
Yes List name: |
|
No |
If yes, which one of the following best describes the nature/type of your museum’s parent
Which one of the following best describes your museum’s governance? (Please select only one: Note: if your museum has a parent organization, please indicate the nature of your parent’s governing authority.)
College/University
|
Non-Profit |
|
For-Profit |
|
Government |
Government
|
|
Municipal |
||
|
|
County |
||
|
|
State |
||
|
|
Federal |
||
|
|
Tribal
|
||
|
Private nonprofit |
|
||
|
For-profit |
|
||
|
Dual (List: _) |
|
||
|
Other: |
|
Year the museum was first open and exhibiting to the general public:
Museum’s attendance for the 12-month period prior to application:
Onsite |
|
Offsite |
|
Online |
|
If your institution currently utilizes any social media platforms, check all that apply and include URLs/Handles:
|
Blog: |
|
|
|
Facebook: |
|
|
|
Twitter: |
|
|
|
YouTube: |
|
|
|
Instagram: |
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
Briefly describe your museum’s major programs and events.
Briefly describe your major exhibits.
Briefly list your key community/educational partners and collaborators.
How many objects does the museum have in its collections (actual or estimated)?
Are your collections accessible to the public online?
Yes
No
If Yes, in what format?
Online exhibit
Collections Database
If your museum owns, manages or borrows collections items, please indicate the types of objects. Check all that apply.
|
Aeronautics, space/airplanes |
|
Animals, live |
|
Animals, preserved |
|
Anthropological, ethnographic |
|
Archaeological |
|
Books |
|
Ceramics, glass, metals, plastics |
|
Documents, manuscripts |
|
Furniture/wooden objects |
|
Geological, mineral, paleontological |
|
Historic building |
|
Historic sites |
|
Horological (clocks) |
|
Landscape features, constructed |
|
Machinery |
|
Maritime, historic ships |
|
Medals |
|
Medical, dental, health, pharmacological |
|
Military, including weapons |
|
Motion picture, audiovisual |
|
Musical instruments |
|
Numismatics (money) |
|
Paintings |
|
Philatelic (stamps) |
|
Photography, negatives |
|
Photography, prints |
|
Physical science projects |
|
Plants, live |
|
Plants, preserved |
|
Sculpture, indoor |
|
Sculpture, outdoor |
|
Textiles and costumes |
|
Tools |
|
Toys and dolls |
|
Transportation, excluding airplanes |
|
Works of art on paper |
|
Other: |
Briefly describe your museum’s facilities (including buildings and grounds).
If your museum is located within a larger facility (for example: a university gallery within a classroom building or a museum inside a performing arts or community center), indicate how your museum exercises control over its space.
Which of the following plans, policies and documents does your museum have in writing? Check all that apply.
|
Accounting & internal control |
|
Budget |
|
Business Plan |
|
Business support |
|
Collections management policy |
|
Collections plan |
|
Conservation plan |
|
Development Plan |
|
Diversity Plan |
|
Emergency/Disaster Preparedness & Recovery Plan |
|
Facilities use/ facilities rental |
|
Furnishing plan (historic sites) |
|
General Facilities Report |
|
Governance manual |
|
Housekeeping plan |
|
Individual donor support |
|
Institutional code of ethics |
|
Integrated Pest Management Plan |
|
Interpretive plan or education master plan |
|
Investment (e.g. endowment investment) |
|
Landscaping/grounds maintenance plan |
|
Marketing plan |
|
Written agreement with parent company or other key stakeholders (if applicable) |
|
Personnel policy issues (Benefits, Compensation, Diversity, Grievance, Harassment, Performance Management, Personnel Records & Privacy, Separation, etc.) / Employee Handbook |
|
Strategic Plan |
|
Succession Plan |
|
Technology Plan |
|
Vision/Value statement(s) |
|
Volunteer manual |
|
Other (please specify): |
Does your museum have some type of institutional planning process in place?
|
Yes |
|
No |
If yes, is it?
|
Formal |
|
Informal |
If informal, please describe:
For
Collections Stewardship Assessment applicants:
Does your museum currently have a collections management policy?
|
No, and none in development |
|
Yes, in development |
|
Yes, and approved by our governing authority |
If the policy is in draft form and not yet approved by your governing authority, explain the status of the draft.
Indicate the frequency of communication among staff, volunteers, and governing authority members at your museum.
|
Staff w/ Staff |
Staff w/Volunteer |
Staff w/Governing Authority |
Infrequent |
|
|
|
Somewhat Frequent |
|
|
|
Very Frequent |
|
|
|
Routine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within the past five years, has your organization experienced any of the following situations? (Check all that apply)
General
Opening a new building or new museum
Closing a Museum
Hiring of first professional staff/director
Organizational restructuring
Change of executive director
Sudden Departure/Death of a director
Turnover of 30% or more of staff
Staff layoffs of 10% or more
Capital Campaign
Significant change of mission/purpose
Loss of significant funding that adversely affected the organization’s ability to fulfill its mission
Institutional Events
Embezzlement/Fiscal Irregularities
Becoming Accredited
Violation of Institutional Code of Ethics
Public pressure to cancel or alter exhibit content
Governance Change
Retrenchment
Cancellation of capital improvements or expansion plans
Organizational Changes
Merger with a larger institution
Merger with an equal institution
Separation from a parent
Separation from another museum
Legal partnership with for-profit entity
Founder
Founder, serves on Board
Founder, serves as Director
Death of a Founder
Natural Disaster
Earthquake
Fire
Flood
Hurricane
Tornado
Other natural or man-made disaster
Building Changes
Expansion of same facility
Construction of new facility
Moving to a different facility
Restoration of a building
Acquire a satellite property
Collections Issues
Non-Collections Based Institution
Theft of collections objects
Acquire significant collection
Hazardous Materials
NAGPRA
Nazi-Era Provenance
Deaccessioning Issues
Ownership dispute/claim against museum or repatriation of object(s)
Other:
If you checked any of the above, briefly describe the circumstances related to the situation(s):
ASSESSMENT HISTORY & PREPARATION
Has
the museum completed a MAP assessment in the last ten years? If so,
indicate which one and the year, and answer the two questions that
follow.
If
you are unsure if your institution has gone through MAP before
please check here
http://ww2.aam-us.org/resources/assessment-programs/accreditation/accredited-museums
or contact [email protected] directly for more information.
|
Yes |
Year |
No |
Don’t Know |
Collections Stewardship Assessment |
|
|
|
|
Organizational Assessment |
|
|
|
|
Community Engagement Assessment |
|
|
|
|
Board Leadership Assessment |
|
|
|
|
If your museum participated in any MAP assessment in the past ten years, please answer the next two questions:
Describe
what accomplishments your museum has achieved since its previous
MAP, especially those related to the MAP results and
recommendations.
Describe
your museum’s need desire for a new assessment.
Applicants are not required to have previously participated in other assessment programs, but this information will provide useful background to the peer reviewer.
Has your museum participated in:
CAP – Collections Assessment for Preservation
Administered by AIC http://www.conservation-us.org/grants/cap; formerly known as the Conservation Assessment Program when it was previously run by Heritage Preservation)
|
Yes |
|
No |
If yes, what year(s):
How has CAP impacted your museum?
StEPs – AASLH’s Standards and Excellence Program for History Organizations https://aaslh.org/programs/steps/
|
Yes |
|
No |
If yes:
What year did your museum begin:
Which sections has your museum worked on:
In which sections have you earned a completion certificate?
How has StEPs helped your museum prepare for MAP?
Other programs or services that helped prepare it for MAP?
|
Yes |
|
No |
If yes, describe (what or who and when):
Has your museum successfully completed AAM’s Core Documents Verification?
https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/core-documents-verification/
|
Yes (Year: ) |
|
No but currently in progress |
|
No but planning to apply |
|
No and not planning to apply |
If you checked “currently in progress”, which documents have passed and when:
Document Type |
Year Passed |
Mission |
|
Institutional Code of Ethics |
|
Institution/Strategic Plan |
|
Collections Management Policy |
|
Emergency Response/Disaster Preparedness Plan |
|
Is the museum considering applying for AAM Accreditation?
https://www.aam-us.org/programs/accreditation-excellence-programs/accreditation/
|
Yes (Reminder: museums must successfully complete the Core Documents Verification Program to be eligible to apply for Accreditation) |
|
No |
|
Not sure |
|
Already accredited by AAM |
If yes, when does the museum plan to apply:
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
6-10 years |
|
More than 10 years from now |
Where did you receive information about MAP? (Check all that apply.)
AAM website
MAP/AAM brochure
From a colleague at my museum
From a colleague at another museum
Session at a national, regional or state museum association conference (please specify):
Listserv posting (please specify):
Discussion with MAP staff
Discussion with IMLS staff
IMLS website/publication (please specify):
Aviso
Other website or Newsletter announcement (please specify):
Previous experience with MAP
Other (please specify):
If you checked more than one source, which was most influential in your decision to submit a MAP application?
How long have you been planning to apply to MAP?
APPLICATION EVALUATION
Including time from all people who participated, approximately how many hours went into preparing, and completing this application?
How valuable was filling out the MAP application for your thinking about your institution and how it works?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(not at all valuable) (very valuable)
If you said 1 to 9, what would make it a 10?
Thinking about the process you just went through to complete the MAP application, please indicate how much you disagree or agree with the following statements:
|
Completely Disagree 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Completely Agree 7 |
The overall description of the MAP program was clear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instructions for filling out the application were easy to follow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filling out the application was easy to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filling out the application had educational value for my museum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filling out the application provided opportunities to discuss important institutional priorities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you encounter any challenge(s) while filling out the application?
Yes No
If Yes, please specify:
Did you need to contact MAP staff during the application process?
Yes No
a. If Yes, were they able to help resolve your issue? Yes No
b. If No, please explain.
Optional: Please provide any additional comments on the application or application process you’d like to share:
We (the undersigned) have examined this MAP Application and agree upon the principle objectives of the Assessment we chose. We have discussed the MAP process with the governing authority and staff (paid and unpaid) and will engage them in the steps of the process. We are ready to work together to identify our current stage of development and institutional needs and to facilitate change. We will review all recommendations that come out of the assessment and incorporate them into our planning. We will pay any associated costs to participate and devote the time needed to complete our MAP Assessment within the designated time period.
We have examined this application, and to the best of our knowledge, we hereby certify that the information provided is true and correct and all requirements for a complete Museum Assessment Program application have been fulfilled.
Two original signatures are required below:
Museum Director/CEO’s signature*:
____________________________________________________ Date: ______
Name: Title: Phone: E-mail:
Head of Governing Authority’s (see glossary) signature:**
____________________________________________________ Date: ______
Name: Title: Phone: E-mail:
Additional Governing Authority Member’s signature: (only for museums without a Director/CEO)**
____________________________________________________ Date: ______
Name: Title: Phone: E-mail:
*If there is no museum director, please have the head of the governing authority sign as well as a second person from the Governing Authority.
** If the head of the governing authority functions as the museum director, an additional signature from another member of the governing authority is required.
1 Full-time is defined as 35 hours per week.
2 An equivalent full-time staff member consists of 2-3 part-time paid or unpaid staff members with responsibilities that relate solely to the museum’s services or operations.
3 Part-time is defined as less than 35 hours per week.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Museum Assessment Program |
Author | jconnors-joyner |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-15 |