Instrument #1
MDL Collaboration Survey Instrument
Overview: This survey instrument is intended to be administered to the MDL project team members and educators. The goal of this survey is to assess the process of collaboration and co-creation which is an essential element for the design and implementation of this pilot platform and resource creation.
Instrument background: This document contains the draft set of survey questions for the Collaboration Survey. This survey derived from elements with Lynn Dierking’s Collaboration: Critical Criteria for Success and the Wilder Collaboration Factor Inventory (Mattessich, Murray-Close, & Monsey, 2001).
https://apha.confex.com/.../Wilder%20Collaboration%20Factors%20Inventory.pdf
Introduction:
Hello! Thank you for making the time for this survey. It serves as a tool to help the project team examine and reflect on understanding of roles, shared sense of goals, expectations for communication and more. Your honest answers will help us improve how the team is working together. Your answers will remain confidential, and will only be used for the purposes of this study. No individual will be directly or indirectly identified, and all results will be presented in aggregate. The data collected for this survey will be destroyed upon the conclusion of the study. Please email [email protected] if you would like a paper version of this survey.
For
the following questions, please rank YOUR perception about the
collaboration. This survey should take no longer than 30 minutes to
complete. We thank you for your time.
|
Question and Response Options |
Page 1 Role |
[] Cooperator and Project Manager (Newfields) [] Educator Partner (Teachers) [] Consultant [] Other / open field
|
Page 1 Goals and Expectations |
Please rate the following statements on a scale from 1 to 7, where “1” means “Strongly Disagree” and “7” means “Strongly Agree: Q2. I believe that there are shared goals across the partner organizations involved in this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
|
Page 1 Goals and Expectations |
Q3.
The expectations have been clearly communicated on what I need to
bring to this collaboration to make it successful. Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q4. My role is clearly defined in this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7, |
Page 1 Goals and Expectations |
Q5 The expectations of my participation are realistic.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q6. The expectations of my organization’s participation are realistic.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q7
People in this collaborative group have a clear sense of their
roles and responsibilities. [OPEN
FIELD FOR COMMENTS]
|
Page 2 Capacity |
Q8 I believe that this collaboration has the STAFF CAPACITY to make adequate contributions necessary for this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q9 I believe that this collaboration has the INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY for this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q10 I believe that this collaboration has the FUNDING that is necessary for this collaboration to succeed.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q11 I believe that this collaboration has the OPPORTUNITY necessary for this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
|
Page 2 Personal Time Commitment |
Q12 The time commitment expected from me to make this collaboration possible is realistic.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS]
|
Page 3 Communication effectiveness |
Q13 The collaboration has had a high level of overall communication effectiveness to date.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
|
Page 3 Project Management |
Q17
I have had regular and easy access to shared stored
documents.
|
Page
3
|
Q20 The people in leadership positions for this collaboration have good skills for working with other people and organizations.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS]
|
Page 4 Participant Goals |
Q21
This collaboration provides an opportunity to deepen the content
available to my audiences.
|
Page
4
|
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN
FIELD FOR COMMENTS] |
Page 5 Environment |
Q26 People involved in our collaboration always trust one another.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7, Q27 I have a lot of respect for the other people involved in this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS] |
Page 5 Shared Stake in Outcomes |
Q28 The organizations that belong to our collaborative group invest the right amount of time and effort to meet our goals in this collaboration.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
Q29 Everyone who is a member of our collaborative group is invested in the process and success of the project's outcome.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN
FIELD FOR COMMENTS]
|
Page 5 Appropriate Scope |
Q30 My ideas about what we want to accomplish with this collaboration seem to be the same as the ideas of others.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7, Q31 We are currently able to keep up with the work necessary to coordinate all the people, organizations, and activities related to this collaborative project.
Rate
on a scale from 1-7,
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS] |
Page 6 Reflection
The questions on this page are only for T2. |
Q32 Why did you initially decide to join this collaboration? [OPEN FIELD]
Q33 Did this collaboration meet, not meet, or exceed your expectations? Explain how. [OPEN FIELD]
Q34 To what extent do you feel you created tools and resources through this process of collaboration that will contribute to the greater good of the museum sector and the K-12 sectors? [OPEN FIELD]
Q35 Did you gain new skills or knowledge from this collaboration? Explain why or why not. [OPEN FIELD]
|
Page 7 Comments |
Q36 Have there been other challenges and barriers in the process of this collaboration? How would you recommend we address those barriers in the future?
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS]
Q37 Is there anything else you feel we need to know to help improve the functioning of this collaboration?
[OPEN FIELD FOR COMMENTS] |
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Rosanna N. Flouty |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-15 |