Appendix O.
Excerpt From WIC PC2018 Final Data Cleaning Plan
WIC PC2018 Final Data Cleaning Plan: 1
Chapter 3. Data Cleaning Plan by Phase 1
A. Phase I: Initial Data Checks 1
B. Phase II: Diagnostic Evaluation 1
Tables
Table 3.1. Variable Range Checks 2
Table 3.2. Internal Consistency Checks 5
Table 3.3. Historical Data Checks 10
Table 3.5. Universal Cleaning Procedures 12
Table 3.6. Derived Variables 17
Table 3.7. WIC PC2018 Participant Characteristics File Variables 20
WIC PC2018 Final Data Cleaning Plan:
Chapter 3. Data Cleaning Plan by Phase
T
For PC2018, State agencies will be asked to submit data on all WIC participants who were certified to receive WIC benefits in April 2018. This includes all WIC participants who were certified, regardless of whether they receive benefits. For example, they include partially breastfeeding women more than 6 months postpartum, even if they receive no food packages, or others who are eligible to receive vouchers but who do not use them. In contrast, for administrative purposes, FNS separately measures participation based on the number of certified individuals who claimed their food instruments each month.1
This first phase of the data cleaning process is to verify whether the data have been submitted in the correct file format and are readable in SAS. If the file can be read into SAS, analysts verify (1) whether it has the correct number of variables (depending on whether just MDS or MDS and SDS items were submitted), and (2) whether it has approximately the correct number of records. The file is checked to ensure the data submissions contain information for the reference month of April. The file is also checked to ensure that essential data items, such as certification category or food package codes, have values for most or all participants. If the file meets these conditions, it is diagnostically evaluated in Phase II. If those conditions are not met, the State agency is asked to correct and resubmit its data file. Acceptable data are converted into a SAS dataset containing both MDS and SDS data for the diagnostic evaluation.
Once the State agency submits a readable file, the data are submitted to the diagnostic SAS program. Substantial resources were invested in the development of these diagnostic tables, and Insight staff will continue to build on these diagnostics to ensure State agency data anomalies are caught and addressed early in the reporting process. This program creates standardized output, consisting of more than 150 tables for each State agency, to identify problems with State agency submissions. The tables facilitate thorough assessment of the data by project analysts.
There are several different ways the data are evaluated. First, each variable is checked to ensure values submitted are within the appropriate ranges and contain valid data. The tables resulting from this analysis include distributions of all MDS and SDS data items. Second, some variables are cross-tabulated with one another to ensure the data are internally consistent. The tables resulting from this analysis include cross-tabulations of related items such as certification category and risk priority level. Third, an additional test compares distributions in the current data collection year to those of the previously collected wave of data to check for consistency. The tables also highlight any errors; for example, the invalid values are put into an error category and displayed alongside the correct data. These three types of analysis are described separately in this document for the purpose of conceptual clarity, but they are often performed simultaneously. The details of each analysis are described below.
Once the diagnostic tables have been evaluated, the project analyst drafts a Diagnostic Memorandum for the State agency’s review. This memo notes each potential problem with the data and suggests possible causes and resolutions. The memo asks the State agency to explain the cause of the data problem(s), and if possible, to resubmit corrected data (see appendix A for a sample memo). Next, a teleconference is held with most State agencies to clarify State agency data practices, ensure correct interpretation of the data, and suggest corrections (if necessary). If a problem can be solved with a limited amount of programming, such as a date submitted in the wrong format, Insight will correct this problem in Phase III as described below. Otherwise, the State agency is asked to resubmit the data within 2 weeks of the call.
This step is repeated for each updated submission so that each submission receives a full diagnostic evaluation to ensure that new errors have not been produced. Once a State agency’s file meets quality standards (on or before the final data submission deadline of September 15, 2018), it is ready for the cleaning and compilation stage. Below, we describe the three main checks that occur in the diagnostic evaluation phase.
The first type of diagnostic test ensures the data for each individual variable appear correct. For some variables, this means confirming there are entries for each respondent. For all variables, it means ensuring the values are in the appropriate formats and ranges. Table 3.1 illustrates the range checks that will be assessed in this first stage.
Table 3.1. Variable Range Checks
Variable |
Checks |
MDS Variables |
|
State Agency ID |
|
Local Agency |
|
Site ID |
|
Participant ID |
|
Birth Date |
|
Race/Ethnicity |
|
Certification Category |
|
Date of Delivery |
|
Weeks Gestation |
|
Certification Date |
|
Sex |
|
Risk Priority Code |
|
TANF Participation |
|
SNAP Participation |
|
Medicaid Participation |
|
Migrant Status |
|
Economic Unit Size |
|
Income |
|
Income Reporting Period |
|
Income Range |
|
Nutritional Risk #1 |
|
Nutritional Risk #2 |
|
Nutritional Risk #3 |
|
Nutritional Risk #4 Through #10 |
|
Hemoglobin |
|
Hematocrit |
|
Blood-Test Date |
|
Weight (pounds) |
|
Weight (quarter pounds) |
|
Weight (grams) |
|
Height (inches) |
|
Height (eighth inches) |
|
Height (centimeters) |
|
Date of Height and Weight Measurement |
|
Date Breastfeeding Data Collected |
|
Food Item (1–14)a |
|
Food Quantity (1–14) |
|
Food Package Code 1–14 |
|
Food Package Type |
|
SDS Variables |
|
Date of First WIC Certification |
|
Education Level |
|
Number in Household on WIC |
|
Date Previous Pregnancy Ended |
|
Total Number of Pregnancies |
|
Total Number of Live Births |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (pounds) |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (quarter pounds) |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (grams) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (pounds) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (quarter pounds) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (grams) |
|
Birth Weight (pounds) |
|
Birth Weight (ounces) |
|
Birth Weight (grams) |
|
Length at Birth (inches) |
|
Length at Birth (eighth inches) |
|
Length at Birth (centimeters) |
|
Participation in FDPIR |
|
a The standard data submission file has room for 14 food items and the corresponding quantities. In some cases, a State agency may list more than 14 items in its food package. In these cases, Insight will work with the State agency to develop an alternative file structure for submissions to allow all of the food items and quantities the agency submits to be tested for data quality.
Are the Data Internally Consistent?
The next level of diagnostic analysis compares two or more variables to ensure the data across multiple values are internally consistent (e.g., birth dates should be consistent with certification categories). Table 3.2 provides details on the internal logic comparisons made at this stage in the diagnostic analysis.
Table 3.2. Internal Consistency Checks
Variable |
Checks |
Site ID/Local Agency |
|
Sex/Certification Category |
|
Age/Certification Category |
|
Date of Delivery/Certification Category |
|
Weeks Gestation/Certification Category |
|
Date of Delivery/Weeks Gestation/Certification Category |
|
Risk Priority Code/Certification Category |
Check for valid risk priority codes by certification category:
|
Economic Unit Size/Certification Category |
|
Income/Income Reporting Period |
|
Income/Income Range |
|
Income/Economic Unit Size |
|
Income Range/Economic Unit Size |
|
Income/Income Range/Certification Category |
|
Program Participation/Income/Income Range |
|
Poverty Level (Income/Number in Economic Unit) |
|
Nutritional Risk 1/Certification Category |
Check for valid nutritional risks by certification category:
|
Nutritional Risk 2/Certification Category |
Check for valid nutritional risks by certification category:
|
Nutritional Risk 3/Certification Category |
Check for valid nutritional risks by certification category:
|
Nutritional Risk 4/Certification Category (repeat for 5–10) |
Check for valid nutritional risks by certification category:
|
Nutrition Risks 1–10 |
|
Hemoglobin/Hematocrit |
|
Hemoglobin/Hematocrit/Certification Category |
|
Blood-Test Date/Hemoglobin/Hematocrit |
|
Blood-Test Date/Certification Date/ Certification Category |
|
Weight/Certification Category |
|
Weight (pounds)/Weight (grams) |
|
Height/Certification Category |
|
Height (inches)/Height (centimeters) |
|
Height/Weight/Certification Category |
|
Height/Age/Height Measurement Date/Certification Category |
|
Weight/Height/Age/Height Measurement Date/Certification Category |
|
Weight/Age/Height Measurement Date/Certification Category |
|
Height and Weight Measurement Date/Age/Certification Category |
|
Currently Breastfed/Certification Category |
|
Ever Breastfed/Certification Category |
|
Ever Breastfed/Currently Breastfed/Certification Category |
|
Ever Breastfed/Currently Breastfed/Age |
Infants 6–13 months old as of April 30, 2018:
|
Currently Breastfed/Age |
|
Length of Time Breastfed/Age/Currently Breastfeeding |
|
Length of Time Breastfed/Age/Ever Breastfed |
Infants 6–13 months old:
|
Date Breastfeeding Data Collected/Age |
|
Date Breastfeeding Data Collected/Age Breastfeeding Data Collected/Currently Breastfeeding |
Infants 6–13 months old:
|
Food Package Type/Certification Category |
|
Missing or Out of Range Food Package Type/Certification Category |
|
Medical Food Package Types/Certification Category |
|
Food Package Number/Certification Category |
|
Date of First WIC Certification/Certification Category |
|
Date of First WIC Certification/Date of Current Certification |
|
Education Level/Certification Category |
|
Number in Household on WIC/Economic Unit Size |
|
Number in Household on WIC/Certification Category |
|
Date Previous Pregnancy Ended/Certification Category |
|
Total Number of Pregnancies/Certification Category |
|
Total Number of Live Births/Certification Category |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (pounds)/Certification Category |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (quarter pounds)/Certification Category |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (grams)/Certification Category |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (pounds)/Certification Category |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (quarter pounds)/Certification Category |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (grams)/Certification Category |
|
Birth Weight (pounds)/Certification Category |
|
Birth Weight (ounces)/Certification Category |
|
Birth Weight (grams)/Certification Category |
|
Length at Birth (inches)/Certification Category |
|
Length at Birth (eighth inches)/Certification Category |
|
Length at Birth (centimeters)/Certification Category |
|
Participation in Food Distribution on Indian Reservations Program/Certification Category |
|
Do the Data Compare Appropriately to Previous WIC PC Distributions?
The diagnostic program also compares the current PC submission to the State agency’s previous PC submission. This comparison across years provides a check against data that may be reported incorrectly but are still within the range of acceptable values. For example, if a State agency reports that 15 percent of its WIC participants are of Hispanic ethnicity in one submission or “wave,” but that value changes to 75 percent in the next wave, this indicates the race/ethnicity variables may be reported incorrectly. Changes greater than +/- 5 percentage points from the previous wave will be investigated. Table 3.3 provides details on the historical data checks made at this stage in the diagnostic analysis.
Table 3.3. Historical Data Checks
Variable |
Checks |
Number of Participants |
|
Race |
|
Race/Ethnicity |
|
Certification Category |
|
Risk Priority Code |
|
TANF Participation |
|
SNAP Participation |
|
Medicaid Participation |
|
Migrant Status |
|
Food Item |
|
Food Package Codes |
|
If the State agency continues to experience trouble generating complete and accurate data for any MDS/SDS element after resubmission(s) of data, Insight works with the WIC PC contact at the State agency to identify accurate versus inaccurate data. If Insight is unable to obtain an explanation for questionable data submitted by a State agency, Insight cleans the data during the State-agency-specific editing stage (Phase III).
Once each State agency has submitted data that meet the quality standards of the diagnostic program described above and all data items have met the checks, that State agency data file is cleaned in four separate steps:
State agency-specific cleaning. The cleaning process has some portions that are specific to the State agency. Some systematic errors discovered during the diagnostic phase may be addressed during this step if the State agency does not have the resources to make the changes internally.
Universal cleaning. All data are cleaned to universal standards. This step includes setting most outliers to missing and top-coding some data. In cases where a respondent should not be in the universe for a specific item, any data reported for that item are set to missing. This step also includes standardization of variables with different reporting formats. Standardization of food codes occurs separately, as described in chapter 4.
Analytic variable creation. Several new variables are created. The new variables are typically created for ease of analysis. For instance, some State agencies report height in inches and eighth inches, while others use centimeters. The new height variable combines those three variables into one variable. Other new variables include anthropometric measures, race/ethnicity variables, and ages at certain measurement dates.
Accuracy checks. Frequencies and cross-tabulations are created for the final set of variables. These tables are reviewed to ensure the data were cleaned correctly and the derived variables have the correct parameters.
Each of these four steps is described in detail below.
State Agency-Specific Cleaning Procedures
The rules for this step of the cleaning are determined in the State-agency-level diagnostic phase described above, and these procedures will be developed and applied for each individual submission. Whether State-agency-specific cleaning is required will be determined after a review of the diagnostics and discussion with the State agency. As mentioned above, every problem identified in a State agency data submission is resolved through a series of communications with the State agency staff. For example, there may be data entry errors (e.g., entries of zero [“0”] for missing income data) or reporting mistakes (e.g., two-digit local agency numbers missing the leading zero). After communicating with the State agency, a State agency-specific program is written to address the specific problems affecting its data. These are handled on a case-by-case basis and therefore cannot be fully detailed here.
Universal Cleaning Procedures
Several variables are submitted in different formats across State agencies. These variables are converted into standard formats during universal cleaning. Table 3.4 illustrates these standard editing procedures. See chapter 4 for details on food code standardization.
Variable |
Recoding Strategy |
Race |
Race can be reported by State agencies in two different ways. For State agencies that use three-digit race codes, these codes are converted to six-digit codes. |
Race (5 category) |
A five-category race variable is created to assign respondents to the mutually exclusive racial/ethnic categories used prior to 2006: White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, or American Indian/Alaskan Native. People of multiple races are assigned to one race, with priority given to different races in different State agencies, as described below. The Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander groups are combined in this coding structure.
Note: This five-category variable permits comparisons of race/ethnicity from before and after 2006. |
Nutritional Risk |
For State agencies reporting nutrition risk codes that do not match FNS standard codes, the crosswalks provided by State agencies between the nutrition risk codes in the data and the FNS standard codes are used to translate the data to the FNS standard. |
Local Agency |
State agencies are asked to submit local agency data using the three-digit code in the WIC LAD, but some may submit their own codes. In these cases, the codes are mapped onto WIC LAD codes. For all States, a character variable with the local agency name is created. Note: The WIC LAD is divided into 90 crosswalks, 1 for each State agency. |
Once all variables have been standardized, universal cleaning procedures are applied uniformly to all State agencies. Outlying and illogical data are set to missing, or in some cases top coded. Dates with missing days are set to 15, and all dates are converted to SAS formats for ease of manipulation. Consistency edits are also done here—for example, deleting the expected date of delivery if the participant is not a pregnant woman. Table 3.5 illustrates these editing procedures.
Table 3.5. Universal Cleaning Procedures
Variable |
Recoding Strategy |
Certification Category |
|
Certification Date |
|
Birth Date |
|
Nutritional Risk |
|
Date of Height and Weight Measurement |
|
Date of Delivery |
|
Date Breastfeeding Data Collected |
|
Weeks of Gestation |
|
Sex |
|
Risk Priority Code |
|
TANF Participation |
|
SNAP Participation |
|
Medicaid Participation |
|
Migrant Worker Status |
|
Size of Economic Unit |
|
Income |
|
Income Period |
|
Income Range |
|
Hemoglobin |
|
Blood-Test Date |
|
Hematocrit |
|
Weight (pounds) |
|
Weight (quarter pounds) |
|
Weight (grams) |
|
Height (inches) |
|
Height (eighth inches) |
|
Height (centimeters) |
|
Currently Breastfed |
|
Ever Breastfed |
|
Length f Time Breastfed (weeks) |
|
Food Package Type |
|
Date of First WIC Certification |
|
Date Last Pregnancy Ended |
|
Number in Household on WIC |
|
Years of Education |
|
Total Number of Pregnancies |
|
Total Number of Live Births |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (pounds) |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (quarter pounds) |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (grams) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (pounds) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (quarter pounds) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (grams) |
|
Birth Weight (pounds) |
|
Birth Weight (ounces) |
|
Birth Weight (grams) |
|
Length at Birth (inches) |
|
Length at Birth (eighth inches) |
|
Length at Birth (centimeters) |
|
Participation in FDPIR |
|
a Certification Category is never recoded. Any records with values other than 1–5 for Certification Category are dropped; all other variables are edited to match the Certification Category, if necessary.
b WIC PC has historically used 40 as the cutoff point.
Creation of Derived Variables
Once the original variables have been cleaned, several new variables are created. These variables are typically added to the dataset to aid in analysis. Most of these are simple calculations using MDS items only. Table 3.6 illustrates the new variables created through this process.
New Variable |
Specifications |
Weight (combined) |
|
BMI |
|
BMI Percentile |
|
Age in Years at Certification Date |
|
Age in Months at Certification Date |
|
Age at Height and Weight Measurement |
For women:
For infants and children:
For all participants:
|
Annual Income |
|
Height (combined, in inches) |
|
Prepregnancy Weight (combined, in pounds) |
|
Weight Gain During Pregnancy (Combined, in pounds) |
|
Birth Weight (combined) |
|
Length at Birth (combined) |
|
Race/Ethnicity Dichotomous Variables |
|
Single Race Dichotomous Variables |
|
Multiple Race Flag |
|
Missing Race Flag |
|
Total Number of Nutritional Risks |
|
FNS Region |
|
Age in Years at Blood Test |
|
Age in Months at Blood Test |
|
Percent of Poverty Level |
|
Weight to Height Percentile Range |
|
Weight to Age Percentile Range |
|
Height to Age Percentile Range |
|
Weight to Height Percentile |
|
Weight to Age Percentile |
|
Height to Age Percentile |
|
Blood Measures Below FNS Standard |
|
Breastfeeding Age Flag |
|
Breastfeeding Status |
|
Breastfeeding Duration, in Weeks |
|
Trimester of Pregnancy at WIC Certification |
|
Trimester of Pregnancy at Time of Blood Test |
|
Food Prescription ID |
|
a See https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/about_childrens_bmi.html
Final Data Check
After the universal cleaning has taken place, an abbreviated set of data frequencies and crosstabs is created from each State agency’s clean data file. This output is reviewed to ensure all cleaning has occurred and composite variables were created as intended. This review confirms that all data are within expected ranges. The data are also examined by certification category to ensure the universes are correct for each variable. This step also checks that the ranges for each variable are appropriate within each certification category. Variables in the SDS are checked to ensure that at least 5 percent of participants who should report that data item are represented in the data. The analyst uses a checklist to ensure the data can be considered final. This checklist is provided in appendix B. After all checks have been completed, the file is considered final and ready for tabulations.
Once the State agency data files have been cleaned, they are used in the creation of the final data files as follows:
Ninety cleaned State agency census files
Combined census file of all WIC participants with appended geographic variables (see section E of this chapter for more information on geographic variables)
Nationally representative sample files (FNS internal file and public use file)
Race/ethnicity dataset
Food package data file
The individual State agency census files, the combined census file, and the nationally representative sample files contain participant-level data. Table 3.7 lists the variables included in the national sample public use file. The Race/ethnicity dataset contains data on the race and ethnicity of participants within each local agency, State agency, and region; three accompanying worksheets summarize this data. The food package file is described in chapter 4.
Table 3.7. WIC PC2018 Participant Characteristics File Variables
Variable Name |
Description |
Variable Type |
STATE |
State agency |
MDS |
STATE_NAME |
State agency name |
Derived |
REGION |
FNS region |
Derived |
LOCAL_NAME |
Local agency name |
Derived |
SITE |
Site code |
MDS |
ID_10 |
Ten-digit local agency identifier |
Derived |
ID |
Case ID |
MDS |
PARTICID |
Participant identifier |
Created |
BDATE |
Birth date |
MDS |
A_MONTHS |
Infant/child age in months |
Derived |
A_YEARS |
Woman’s age in years |
Derived |
ORIGINAL_RACE |
Race as submitted |
Derived |
RACE5 |
Race recoded into pre-2006 categories |
Derived |
HISP |
Hispanic/Latino origin |
Derived |
INDIAN |
American Indian/Alaska Native |
Derived |
ASIAN |
Asian |
Derived |
BLACK |
Black/African-American |
Derived |
HIPI |
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander |
Derived |
WHITE |
White |
Derived |
INDIAN_ONLY |
American Indian/Alaska Native only |
Derived |
ASIAN_ONLY |
Asian only |
Derived |
BLACK_ONLY |
Black only |
Derived |
HIPI_ONLY |
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander only |
Derived |
WHITE_ONLY |
White only |
Derived |
MULTIPLE_RACE |
Two or more races |
Derived |
NO_RACE_REPORTED |
Race not reported |
Derived |
CERT_CAT |
Certification category |
MDS |
EDATE |
Expected date of delivery |
MDS |
GEST |
Weeks gestation |
MDS |
TRIMSTR |
Trimester of pregnancy at WIC certification |
Derived |
CDATE |
Date of current certification |
MDS |
SEX |
Sex |
MDS |
RISK_PRI |
Risk priority codes |
MDS |
TANF |
Participation in TANF |
MDS |
SNAP |
Participation in SNAP |
MDS |
MEDICAID |
Participation in Medicaid |
MDS |
MIGRANT |
Status as a migrant worker |
MDS |
ECO_UNIT |
Number in economic unit/family |
MDS |
INCOME |
Economic unit/family income |
MDS |
INC_PER |
Reporting period for INCOME |
MDS |
INC_ADJN |
Annual income ranges |
MDS |
ANUALINC |
Economic unit/family annual income |
Derived |
POVLEVEL |
Percent of Federal poverty level |
Derived |
NAWD1-NAWD10 |
Nutritional risk(s) present at certification |
MDS |
MAX_NAWD |
Total number of nutritional risks |
Derived |
HEMOGLOB |
Hemoglobin measure |
MDS |
HEMACRIT |
Hematocrit measure |
MDS |
R_BELOW |
Blood measures below FNS standard |
Derived |
BLDATE |
Date of blood test |
MDS |
ANEMIA_MONTHS |
Infant/child age in months at blood test |
Derived |
ANEMIA_YEARS |
Woman’s age in years at blood test |
Derived |
ANEMIA_TRIMSTR |
Trimester of pregnancy at blood test |
Derived |
WGHT |
Weight |
Derived |
HGHT |
Height |
Derived |
HDATE |
Date of height/weight measurements |
MDS |
A_WTAG |
Combined weight-to-age percentile (ranges): WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
A_WTAG_OLD |
Weight-to-age percentile (ranges): NCHS standards |
Derived |
A_HTAG |
Combined height-to-age percentile (ranges): WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
A_HTAG_OLD |
Height-to-age percentile (ranges): NCHS standards |
Derived |
A_WTHT |
Combined weight-to-height percentile (ranges): WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
A_WTHT_OLD |
Weight-to-height percentile (ranges): NCHS standards |
Derived |
P_WTAG |
Weight-to-age percentile: WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
P_WTAG_OLD |
Weight-to-age percentile: NCHS standards |
Derived |
P_HTAG |
Height-to-age percentile: WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
|
P_HTAG_OLD |
Height-to-age percentile: NCHS standards |
Derived |
P_WTHT |
Weight-to-height percentile: WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
P_WTHT_OLD |
Weight-to-height percentile: NCHS standards |
Derived |
BMI |
BMI: WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
BMI_OLD |
Body mass index (BMI): NCHS standards |
Derived |
BMIPCT |
BMI percentile: WHO standards for infants and children (0–23 months) and CDC standards for children (24–60 months) |
Derived |
BMIPCT_OLD |
BMI percentile: NCHS standards |
Derived |
CBRSTFED |
Currently breastfeeding indicator |
MDS |
EBRSTFED |
Ever breastfed indicator |
MDS |
BRSTFED |
Length of time breastfed |
MDS |
AGE_BF_FLAG |
Breastfeeding age flag |
Derived |
BFED |
Breastfeeding status |
Derived |
BFDATE |
Date of breastfeeding measurements |
MDS |
DURWEEKS |
Breastfeeding duration, in weeks |
Derived |
FPACK1-FPACK14 |
Food package code(s) |
MDS |
ITEM1-ITEM14 |
Food item code(s) |
MDS |
QTY1-QTY14 |
Food item quantity |
MDS |
FP_TYPE |
Food package type |
MDS |
SCRIPTID |
Food prescription identifier |
Created |
FDATE |
Date of first WIC certification |
SDS |
EDUC |
Years of education |
SDS |
NUMONWIC |
Number in household on WIC |
SDS |
PDATE |
Date previous pregnancy ended |
SDS |
TOTLPREG |
Total number of pregnancies |
SDS |
TPREGLIV |
Total number of live births |
SDS |
WTHTAGE |
Infant/child age in months at time of weight and height measurement |
Derived |
PREGWHT |
Prepregnancy weight in pounds |
SDS |
GAINWGHT |
Weight gain during pregnancy in pounds |
SDS |
BIRTHWGT |
Birth weight in pounds |
SDS |
BIRTHHGT |
Birth length in inches |
SDS |
FDPIR |
Participation in FDPIR |
SDS |
n |
Weighting variable |
Created |
TARGET_GROUP |
Target group for sampling |
Derived |
SELECT |
Percentile for sampling |
Derived |
1 For each PC report, a WIC participant is defined as a person who was certified to receive WIC benefits in April of the reference year, including individuals who did not claim a food instrument in April. In accordance with WIC regulations, this definition includes fully breastfeeding infants who were certified for WIC benefits but were not prescribed a food package, as well as partially breastfeeding women who were not prescribed a food package but whose infants were prescribed a food package. In contrast, for administrative purposes, FNS measures participation based on the number of certified individuals who claimed their FIs each month.
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Nicole Huret |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-15 |