29 Cfr 1915.1053

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

ELECTRONIC CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
e-CFR data is current as of September 30, 2019
Title 29 → Subtitle B → Chapter XVII → Part 1926 → Subpart Z → §1926.1153
Title 29: Labor
PART 1926—SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION
Subpart Z—Toxic and Hazardous Substances
§1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica.
(a) Scope and application. This section applies to all occupational exposures to respirable crystalline silica in construction
work, except where employee exposure will remain below 25 micrograms per cubic meter of air (25 µg/m3) as an 8-hour timeweighted average (TWA) under any foreseeable conditions.
(b) Definitions. For the purposes of this section the following definitions apply:
Action level means a concentration of airborne respirable crystalline silica of 25 µg/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA.
Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor,
or designee.
Director means the Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, or designee.
Competent person means an individual who is capable of identifying existing and foreseeable respirable crystalline silica
hazards in the workplace and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate or minimize them. The
competent person must have the knowledge and ability necessary to fulfill the responsibilities set forth in paragraph (g) of this
section.
Employee exposure means the exposure to airborne respirable crystalline silica that would occur if the employee were not
using a respirator.
High-efficiency particulate air [HEPA] filter means a filter that is at least 99.97 percent efficient in removing mono-dispersed
particles of 0.3 micrometers in diameter.
Objective data means information, such as air monitoring data from industry-wide surveys or calculations based on the
composition of a substance, demonstrating employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica associated with a particular
product or material or a specific process, task, or activity. The data must reflect workplace conditions closely resembling or with
a higher exposure potential than the processes, types of material, control methods, work practices, and environmental
conditions in the employer's current operations.
Physician or other licensed health care professional [PLHCP] means an individual whose legally permitted scope of
practice (i.e., license, registration, or certification) allows him or her to independently provide or be delegated the responsibility
to provide some or all of the particular health care services required by paragraph (h) of this section.
Respirable crystalline silica means quartz, cristobalite, and/or tridymite contained in airborne particles that are determined
to be respirable by a sampling device designed to meet the characteristics for respirable-particle-size-selective samplers
specified in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 7708:1995: Air Quality—Particle Size Fraction Definitions
for Health-Related Sampling.
Specialist means an American Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or an American Board Certified Specialist
in Occupational Medicine.
This section means this respirable crystalline silica standard, 29 CFR 1926.1153.
(c) Specified exposure control methods. (1) For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall
fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table
1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with
paragraph (d) of this section.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

1/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

T

1—S

E

C

M

W

W

W

M

C

C

S

Equipment/task
(i) Stationary masonry saws

(ii) Handheld power saws (any blade diameter)

(iii) Handheld power saws for cutting fiber-cement board (with
blade diameter of 8 inches or less)

(iv) Walk-behind saws

(v) Drivable saws

(vi) Rig-mounted core saws or drills

(vii) Handheld and stand-mounted drills (including impact and
rotary hammer drills)

(viii) Dowel drilling rigs for concrete

(ix) Vehicle-mounted drilling rigs for rock and concrete

(x) Jackhammers and handheld powered chipping tools

(xi) Handheld grinders for mortar removal (i.e., tuckpointing)

Engineering and work practice control methods
Use saw equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the blade
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Use saw equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the blade
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions:
—When used outdoors
—When used indoors or in an enclosed area
For tasks performed outdoors only:
Use saw equipped with commercially available dust collection system
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Dust collector must provide the air flow recommended by the tool
manufacturer, or greater, and have a filter with 99% or greater
efficiency
Use saw equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the blade
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions:
—When used outdoors
—When used indoors or in an enclosed area
For tasks performed outdoors only:
Use saw equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the blade
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Use tool equipped with integrated water delivery system that supplies
water to cutting surface
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Use drill equipped with commercially available shroud or cowling with
dust collection system
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Dust collector must provide the air flow recommended by the tool
manufacturer, or greater, and have a filter with 99% or greater
efficiency and a filter-cleaning mechanism
Use a HEPA-filtered vacuum when cleaning holes
For tasks performed outdoors only:
Use shroud around drill bit with a dust collection system. Dust
collector must have a filter with 99% or greater efficiency and a filtercleaning mechanism
Use a HEPA-filtered vacuum when cleaning holes
Use dust collection system with close capture hood or shroud around
drill bit with a low-flow water spray to wet the dust at the discharge
point from the dust collector
OR
Operate from within an enclosed cab and use water for dust
suppression on drill bit
Use tool with water delivery system that supplies a continuous stream
or spray of water at the point of impact:
—When used outdoors
—When used indoors or in an enclosed area
OR
Use tool equipped with commercially available shroud and dust
collection system
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Dust collector must provide the air flow recommended by the tool
manufacturer, or greater, and have a filter with 99% or greater
efficiency and a filter-cleaning mechanism:
—When used outdoors
—When used indoors or in an enclosed area
Use grinder equipped with commercially available shroud and dust
collection system
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

Required respiratory
protection and minimum
assigned protection
factor (APF)
≤4
>4
hours/shift hours/shift
None
None.

None
APF 10

APF 10.
APF 10.

None

None.

None
APF 10

None.
APF 10.

None

None.

None

None.

None

None.

APF 10

APF 10.

None

None.

None

None.

None
APF 10

APF 10.
APF 10.

None
APF 10
APF 10

APF 10.
APF 10.
APF 25.

2/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

Dust collector must provide 25 cubic feet per minute (cfm) or greater
of airflow per inch of wheel diameter and have a filter with 99% or
greater efficiency and a cyclonic pre-separator or filter-cleaning
mechanism
(xii) Handheld grinders for uses other than mortar removal
For tasks performed outdoors only:
Use grinder equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the grinding surface
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
OR
Use grinder equipped with commercially available shroud and dust
collection system
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Dust collector must provide 25 cubic feet per minute (cfm) or greater
of airflow per inch of wheel diameter and have a filter with 99% or
greater efficiency and a cyclonic pre-separator or filter-cleaning
mechanism:
—When used outdoors
—When used indoors or in an enclosed area
(xiii) Walk-behind milling machines and floor grinders
Use machine equipped with integrated water delivery system that
continuously feeds water to the cutting surface
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
OR
Use machine equipped with dust collection system recommended by
the manufacturer
Operate and maintain tool in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Dust collector must provide the air flow recommended by the
manufacturer, or greater, and have a filter with 99% or greater
efficiency and a filter-cleaning mechanism
When used indoors or in an enclosed area, use a HEPA-filtered
vacuum to remove loose dust in between passes
(xiv) Small drivable milling machines (less than half-lane)
Use a machine equipped with supplemental water sprays designed to
suppress dust. Water must be combined with a surfactant
Operate and maintain machine to minimize dust emissions
(xv) Large drivable milling machines (half-lane and larger)
For cuts of any depth on asphalt only:
Use machine equipped with exhaust ventilation on drum enclosure
and supplemental water sprays designed to suppress dust
Operate and maintain machine to minimize dust emissions
For cuts of four inches in depth or less on any substrate:
Use machine equipped with exhaust ventilation on drum enclosure
and supplemental water sprays designed to suppress dust
Operate and maintain machine to minimize dust emissions
OR
Use a machine equipped with supplemental water spray designed to
suppress dust. Water must be combined with a surfactant
Operate and maintain machine to minimize dust emissions
(xvi) Crushing machines
Use equipment designed to deliver water spray or mist for dust
suppression at crusher and other points where dust is generated (e.g.,
hoppers, conveyers, sieves/sizing or vibrating components, and
discharge points)
Operate and maintain machine in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions to minimize dust emissions
Use a ventilated booth that provides fresh, climate-controlled air to the
operator, or a remote control station
(xvii) Heavy equipment and utility vehicles used to abrade or
Operate equipment from within an enclosed cab
fracture silica-containing materials (e.g., hoe-ramming, rock
When employees outside of the cab are engaged in the task, apply
ripping) or used during demolition activities involving silicawater and/or dust suppressants as necessary to minimize dust
containing materials
emissions
(xviii) Heavy equipment and utility vehicles for tasks such as
Apply water and/or dust suppressants as necessary to minimize dust
grading and excavating but not including: Demolishing, abrading, emissions
or fracturing silica-containing materials
OR
When the equipment operator is the only employee engaged in the
task, operate equipment from within an enclosed cab

None

None.

None
None
None

None.
APF 10.
None.

None

None.

None

None.

None

None.

None

None.

None

None.

None

None.

None
None

None.
None.

None

None.

None

None.

(2) When implementing the control measures specified in Table 1, each employer shall:
(i) For tasks performed indoors or in enclosed areas, provide a means of exhaust as needed to minimize the accumulation
of visible airborne dust;
(ii) For tasks performed using wet methods, apply water at flow rates sufficient to minimize release of visible dust;
(iii) For measures implemented that include an enclosed cab or booth, ensure that the enclosed cab or booth:
(A) Is maintained as free as practicable from settled dust;
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

3/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(B) Has door seals and closing mechanisms that work properly;
(C) Has gaskets and seals that are in good condition and working properly;
(D) Is under positive pressure maintained through continuous delivery of fresh air;
(E) Has intake air that is filtered through a filter that is 95% efficient in the 0.3-10.0 µm range (e.g., MERV-16 or better); and
(F) Has heating and cooling capabilities.
(3) Where an employee performs more than one task on Table 1 during the course of a shift, and the total duration of all
tasks combined is more than four hours, the required respiratory protection for each task is the respiratory protection specified
for more than four hours per shift. If the total duration of all tasks on Table 1 combined is less than four hours, the required
respiratory protection for each task is the respiratory protection specified for less than four hours per shift.
(d) Alternative exposure control methods. For tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer does not fully and properly
implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1:
(1) Permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration
of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 µg/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA.
(2) Exposure assessment—(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may
reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the
performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.
(ii) Performance option. The employer shall assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of any
combination of air monitoring data or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee exposures to respirable
crystalline silica.
(iii) Scheduled monitoring option. (A) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for
each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on
each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where several employees perform the same tasks on the same shift
and in the same work area, the employer may sample a representative fraction of these employees in order to meet this
requirement. In representative sampling, the employer shall sample the employee(s) who are expected to have the highest
exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
(B) If initial monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level, the employer may discontinue
monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring.
(C) Where the most recent exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are at or above the action level but at
or below the PEL, the employer shall repeat such monitoring within six months of the most recent monitoring.
(D) Where the most recent exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are above the PEL, the employer shall
repeat such monitoring within three months of the most recent monitoring.
(E) Where the most recent (non-initial) exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level,
the employer shall repeat such monitoring within six months of the most recent monitoring until two consecutive measurements,
taken seven or more days apart, are below the action level, at which time the employer may discontinue monitoring for those
employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this
section.
(iv) Reassessment of exposures. The employer shall reassess exposures whenever a change in the production, process,
control equipment, personnel, or work practices may reasonably be expected to result in new or additional exposures at or
above the action level, or when the employer has any reason to believe that new or additional exposures at or above the action
level have occurred.
(v) Methods of sample analysis. The employer shall ensure that all samples taken to satisfy the monitoring requirements of
paragraph (d)(2) of this section are evaluated by a laboratory that analyzes air samples for respirable crystalline silica in
accordance with the procedures in Appendix A to this section.
(vi) Employee notification of assessment results. (A) Within five working days after completing an exposure assessment in
accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the employer shall individually notify each affected employee in writing of the
results of that assessment or post the results in an appropriate location accessible to all affected employees.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

4/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(B) Whenever an exposure assessment indicates that employee exposure is above the PEL, the employer shall describe in
the written notification the corrective action being taken to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL.
(vii) Observation of monitoring. (A) Where air monitoring is performed to comply with the requirements of this section, the
employer shall provide affected employees or their designated representatives an opportunity to observe any monitoring of
employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
(B) When observation of monitoring requires entry into an area where the use of protective clothing or equipment is
required for any workplace hazard, the employer shall provide the observer with protective clothing and equipment at no cost
and shall ensure that the observer uses such clothing and equipment.
(3) Methods of compliance—(i) Engineering and work practice controls. The employer shall use engineering and work
practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the
employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls
are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce
employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies
with the requirements of paragraph (e) of this section.
(ii) Abrasive blasting. In addition to the requirements of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section, the employer shall comply with
other OSHA standards, when applicable, such as 29 CFR 1926.57 (Ventilation), where abrasive blasting is conducted using
crystalline silica-containing blasting agents, or where abrasive blasting is conducted on substrates that contain crystalline silica.
(e) Respiratory protection—(1) General. Where respiratory protection is required by this section, the employer must provide
each employee an appropriate respirator that complies with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134.
Respiratory protection is required:
(i) Where specified by Table 1 of paragraph (c) of this section; or
(ii) For tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer does not fully and properly implement the engineering controls,
work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1:
(A) Where exposures exceed the PEL during periods necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work
practice controls;
(B) Where exposures exceed the PEL during tasks, such as certain maintenance and repair tasks, for which engineering
and work practice controls are not feasible; and
(C) During tasks for which an employer has implemented all feasible engineering and work practice controls and such
controls are not sufficient to reduce exposures to or below the PEL.
(2) Respiratory protection program. Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer shall institute a
respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134.
(3) Specified exposure control methods. For the tasks listed in Table 1 in paragraph (c) of this section, if the employer fully
and properly implements the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1, the employer
shall be considered to be in compliance with paragraph (e)(1) of this section and the requirements for selection of respirators in
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii) and (d)(3) with regard to exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
(f) Housekeeping. (1) The employer shall not allow dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to
employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica unless wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that
minimize the likelihood of exposure are not feasible.
(2) The employer shall not allow compressed air to be used to clean clothing or surfaces where such activity could
contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica unless:
(i) The compressed air is used in conjunction with a ventilation system that effectively captures the dust cloud created by
the compressed air; or
(ii) No alternative method is feasible.
(g) Written exposure control plan. (1) The employer shall establish and implement a written exposure control plan that
contains at least the following elements:
(i) A description of the tasks in the workplace that involve exposure to respirable crystalline silica;

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

5/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(ii) A description of the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection used to limit employee exposure to
respirable crystalline silica for each task;
(iii) A description of the housekeeping measures used to limit employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and
(iv) A description of the procedures used to restrict access to work areas, when necessary, to minimize the number of
employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica and their level of exposure, including exposures generated by other
employers or sole proprietors.
(2) The employer shall review and evaluate the effectiveness of the written exposure control plan at least annually and
update it as necessary.
(3) The employer shall make the written exposure control plan readily available for examination and copying, upon request,
to each employee covered by this section, their designated representatives, the Assistant Secretary and the Director.
(4) The employer shall designate a competent person to make frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and
equipment to implement the written exposure control plan.
(h) Medical surveillance—(1) General. (i) The employer shall make medical surveillance available at no cost to the
employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who will be required under this section to use a respirator for
30 or more days per year.
(ii) The employer shall ensure that all medical examinations and procedures required by this section are performed by a
PLHCP as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Initial examination. The employer shall make available an initial (baseline) medical examination within 30 days after
initial assignment, unless the employee has received a medical examination that meets the requirements of this section within
the last three years. The examination shall consist of:
(i) A medical and work history, with emphasis on: Past, present, and anticipated exposure to respirable crystalline silica,
dust, and other agents affecting the respiratory system; any history of respiratory system dysfunction, including signs and
symptoms of respiratory disease (e.g., shortness of breath, cough, wheezing); history of tuberculosis; and smoking status and
history;
(ii) A physical examination with special emphasis on the respiratory system;
(iii) A chest X-ray (a single posteroanterior radiographic projection or radiograph of the chest at full inspiration recorded on
either film (no less than 14 x 17 inches and no more than 16 x 17 inches) or digital radiography systems), interpreted and
classified according to the International Labour Office (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses by a
NIOSH-certified B Reader;
(iv) A pulmonary function test to include forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and
FEV1/FVC ratio, administered by a spirometry technician with a current certificate from a NIOSH-approved spirometry course;
(v) Testing for latent tuberculosis infection; and
(vi) Any other tests deemed appropriate by the PLHCP.
(3) Periodic examinations. The employer shall make available medical examinations that include the procedures described
in paragraph (h)(2) of this section (except paragraph (h)(2)(v)) at least every three years, or more frequently if recommended by
the PLHCP.
(4) Information provided to the PLHCP. The employer shall ensure that the examining PLHCP has a copy of this standard,
and shall provide the PLHCP with the following information:
(i) A description of the employee's former, current, and anticipated duties as they relate to the employee's occupational
exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
(ii) The employee's former, current, and anticipated levels of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
(iii) A description of any personal protective equipment used or to be used by the employee, including when and for how
long the employee has used or will use that equipment; and
(iv) Information from records of employment-related medical examinations previously provided to the employee and
currently within the control of the employer.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

6/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(5) PLHCP's written medical report for the employee. The employer shall ensure that the PLHCP explains to the employee
the results of the medical examination and provides each employee with a written medical report within 30 days of each medical
examination performed. The written report shall contain:
(i) A statement indicating the results of the medical examination, including any medical condition(s) that would place the
employee at increased risk of material impairment to health from exposure to respirable crystalline silica and any medical
conditions that require further evaluation or treatment;
(ii) Any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators;
(iii) Any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and
(iv) A statement that the employee should be examined by a specialist (pursuant to paragraph (h)(7) of this section) if the
chest X-ray provided in accordance with this section is classified as 1/0 or higher by the B Reader, or if referral to a specialist is
otherwise deemed appropriate by the PLHCP.
(6) PLHCP's written medical opinion for the employer. (i) The employer shall obtain a written medical opinion from the
PLHCP within 30 days of the medical examination. The written opinion shall contain only the following:
(A) The date of the examination;
(B) A statement that the examination has met the requirements of this section; and
(C) Any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators.
(ii) If the employee provides written authorization, the written opinion shall also contain either or both of the following:
(A) Any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
(B) A statement that the employee should be examined by a specialist (pursuant to paragraph (h)(7) of this section) if the
chest X-ray provided in accordance with this section is classified as 1/0 or higher by the B Reader, or if referral to a specialist is
otherwise deemed appropriate by the PLHCP.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that each employee receives a copy of the written medical opinion described in paragraph
(h)(6)(i) and (ii) of this section within 30 days of each medical examination performed.
(7) Additional examinations. (i) If the PLHCP's written medical opinion indicates that an employee should be examined by a
specialist, the employer shall make available a medical examination by a specialist within 30 days after receiving the PLHCP's
written opinion.
(ii) The employer shall ensure that the examining specialist is provided with all of the information that the employer is
obligated to provide to the PLHCP in accordance with paragraph (h)(4) of this section.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that the specialist explains to the employee the results of the medical examination and
provides each employee with a written medical report within 30 days of the examination. The written report shall meet the
requirements of paragraph (h)(5) (except paragraph (h)(5)(iv)) of this section.
(iv) The employer shall obtain a written opinion from the specialist within 30 days of the medical examination. The written
opinion shall meet the requirements of paragraph (h)(6) (except paragraph (h)(6)(i)(B) and (ii)(B)) of this section.
(i) Communication of respirable crystalline silica hazards to employees—(1) Hazard communication. The employer shall
include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29
CFR 1910.1200). The employer shall ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of crystalline silica and
safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraph (i)(2) of this section. The employer
shall ensure that at least the following hazards are addressed: Cancer, lung effects, immune system effects, and kidney effects.
(2) Employee information and training. (i) The employer shall ensure that each employee covered by this section can
demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the following:
(A) The health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
(B) Specific tasks in the workplace that could result in exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
(C) Specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica,
including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used;
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

7/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(D) The contents of this section;
(E) The identity of the competent person designated by the employer in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of this section;
and
(F) The purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (h) of this section.
(ii) The employer shall make a copy of this section readily available without cost to each employee covered by this section.
(j) Recordkeeping—(1) Air monitoring data. (i) The employer shall make and maintain an accurate record of all exposure
measurements taken to assess employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica, as prescribed in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section.
(ii) This record shall include at least the following information:
(A) The date of measurement for each sample taken;
(B) The task monitored;
(C) Sampling and analytical methods used;
(D) Number, duration, and results of samples taken;
(E) Identity of the laboratory that performed the analysis;
(F) Type of personal protective equipment, such as respirators, worn by the employees monitored; and
(G) Name and job classification of all employees represented by the monitoring, indicating which employees were actually
monitored.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that exposure records are maintained and made available in accordance with 29 CFR
1910.1020.
(2) Objective data. (i) The employer shall make and maintain an accurate record of all objective data relied upon to comply
with the requirements of this section.
(ii) This record shall include at least the following information:
(A) The crystalline silica-containing material in question;
(B) The source of the objective data;
(C) The testing protocol and results of testing;
(D) A description of the process, task, or activity on which the objective data were based; and
(E) Other data relevant to the process, task, activity, material, or exposures on which the objective data were based.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that objective data are maintained and made available in accordance with 29 CFR
1910.1020.
(3) Medical surveillance. (i) The employer shall make and maintain an accurate record for each employee covered by
medical surveillance under paragraph (h) of this section.
(ii) The record shall include the following information about the employee:
(A) Name;
(B) A copy of the PLHCPs' and specialists' written medical opinions; and
(C) A copy of the information provided to the PLHCPs and specialists.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that medical records are maintained and made available in accordance with 29 CFR
1910.1020.
(k) Dates. (1) This section shall become effective June 23, 2016.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

8/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

(2) All obligations of this section, except requirements for methods of sample analysis in paragraph (d)(2)(v), shall
commence June 23, 2017.
(3) Requirements for methods of sample analysis in paragraph (d)(2)(v) of this section commence June 23, 2018.
A

A

§1926.1153—M

S

A

This This appendix specifies the procedures for analyzing air samples for respirable crystalline silica, as well as the quality control procedures that
employers must ensure that laboratories use when performing an analysis required under 29 CFR 1926.1153 (d)(2)(v). Employers must ensure that
such a laboratory:
1. Evaluates all samples using the procedures specified in one of the following analytical methods: OSHA ID-142; NMAM 7500; NMAM 7602;
NMAM 7603; MSHA P-2; or MSHA P-7;
2. Is accredited to ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005 with respect to crystalline silica analyses by a body that is compliant with ISO/IEC Standard
17011:2004 for implementation of quality assessment programs;
3. Uses the most current National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or NIST traceable standards for instrument calibration or
instrument calibration verification;
4. Implements an internal quality control (QC) program that evaluates analytical uncertainty and provides employers with estimates of sampling
and analytical error;
5. Characterizes the sample material by identifying polymorphs of respirable crystalline silica present, identifies the presence of any interfering
compounds that might affect the analysis, and makes any corrections necessary in order to obtain accurate sample analysis; and
6. Analyzes quantitatively for crystalline silica only after confirming that the sample matrix is free of uncorrectable analytical interferences, corrects
for analytical interferences, and uses a method that meets the following performance specifications:
6.1 Each day that samples are analyzed, performs instrument calibration checks with standards that bracket the sample concentrations;
6.2 Uses five or more calibration standard levels to prepare calibration curves and ensures that standards are distributed through the calibration
range in a manner that accurately reflects the underlying calibration curve; and
6.3 Optimizes methods and instruments to obtain a quantitative limit of detection that represents a value no higher than 25 percent of the PEL
based on sample air volume.

A

B

§1926.1153—M

S

G

I
The purpose of this Appendix is to provide medical information and recommendations to aid physicians and other licensed health care
professionals (PLHCPs) regarding compliance with the medical surveillance provisions of the respirable crystalline silica standard (29 CFR 1926.1153).
Appendix B is for informational and guidance purposes only and none of the statements in Appendix B should be construed as imposing a mandatory
requirement on employers that is not otherwise imposed by the standard.
Medical screening and surveillance allow for early identification of exposure-related health effects in individual employee and groups of
employees, so that actions can be taken to both avoid further exposure and prevent or address adverse health outcomes. Silica-related diseases can
be fatal, encompass a variety of target organs, and may have public health consequences when considering the increased risk of a latent tuberculosis
(TB) infection becoming active. Thus, medical surveillance of silica-exposed employees requires that PLHCPs have a thorough knowledge of silicarelated health effects.
This Appendix is divided into seven sections. Section 1 reviews silica-related diseases, medical responses, and public health responses. Section 2
outlines the components of the medical surveillance program for employees exposed to silica. Section 3 describes the roles and responsibilities of the
PLHCP implementing the program and of other medical specialists and public health professionals. Section 4 provides a discussion of considerations,
including confidentiality. Section 5 provides a list of additional resources and Section 6 lists references. Section 7 provides sample forms for the written
medical report for the employee, the written medical opinion for the employer and the written authorization.

1. R

S

-R

D

1.1. Overview. The term “silica” refers specifically to the compound silicon dioxide (SiO2). Silica is a major component of sand, rock, and mineral
ores. Exposure to fine (respirable size) particles of crystalline forms of silica is associated with adverse health effects, such as silicosis, lung cancer,
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and activation of latent TB infections. Exposure to respirable crystalline silica can occur in industry
settings such as foundries, abrasive blasting operations, paint manufacturing, glass and concrete product manufacturing, brick making, china and
pottery manufacturing, manufacturing of plumbing fixtures, and many construction activities including highway repair, masonry, concrete work, rock
drilling, and tuck-pointing. New uses of silica continue to emerge. These include countertop manufacturing, finishing, and installation (Kramer et al.
2012; OSHA 2015) and hydraulic fracturing in the oil and gas industry (OSHA 2012).
Silicosis is an irreversible, often disabling, and sometimes fatal fibrotic lung disease. Progression of silicosis can occur despite removal from
further exposure. Diagnosis of silicosis requires a history of exposure to silica and radiologic findings characteristic of silica exposure. Three different
presentations of silicosis (chronic, accelerated, and acute) have been defined. Accelerated and acute silicosis are much less common than chronic
silicosis. However, it is critical to recognize all cases of accelerated and acute silicosis because these are life-threatening illnesses and because they
are caused by substantial overexposures to respirable crystalline silica. Although any case of silicosis indicates a breakdown in prevention, a case of
acute or accelerated silicosis implies current high exposure and a very marked breakdown in prevention.
In addition to silicosis, employees exposed to respirable crystalline silica, especially those with accelerated or acute silicosis, are at increased risks
of contracting active TB and other infections (ATS 1997; Rees and Murray 2007). Exposure to respirable crystalline silica also increases an employee's
risk of developing lung cancer, and the higher the cumulative exposure, the higher the risk (Steenland et al. 2001; Steenland and Ward 2014).
Symptoms for these diseases and other respirable crystalline silica-related diseases are discussed below.

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

9/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

1.2. Chronic Silicosis. Chronic silicosis is the most common presentation of silicosis and usually occurs after at least 10 years of exposure to
respirable crystalline silica. The clinical presentation of chronic silicosis is:
1.2.1. Symptoms—shortness of breath and cough, although employees may not notice any symptoms early in the disease. Constitutional
symptoms, such as fever, loss of appetite and fatigue, may indicate other diseases associated with silica exposure, such as TB infection or lung
cancer. Employees with these symptoms should immediately receive further evaluation and treatment.
1.2.2. Physical Examination—may be normal or disclose dry rales or rhonchi on lung auscultation.
1.2.3. Spirometry—may be normal or may show only a mild restrictive or obstructive pattern.
1.2.4. Chest X-ray—classic findings are small, rounded opacities in the upper lung fields bilaterally. However, small irregular opacities and
opacities in other lung areas can also occur. Rarely, “eggshell calcifications” in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes are seen.
1.2.5. Clinical Course—chronic silicosis in most cases is a slowly progressive disease. Under the respirable crystalline silica standard, the PLHCP
is to recommend that employees with a 1/0 category X-ray be referred to an American Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational
Medicine. The PLHCP and/or Specialist should counsel employees regarding work practices and personal habits that could affect employees'
respiratory health.
1.3. Accelerated Silicosis. Accelerated silicosis generally occurs within 5-10 years of exposure and results from high levels of exposure to
respirable crystalline silica. The clinical presentation of accelerated silicosis is:
1.3.1. Symptoms—shortness of breath, cough, and sometimes sputum production. Employees with exposure to respirable crystalline silica, and
especially those with accelerated silicosis, are at high risk for activation of TB infections, atypical mycobacterial infections, and fungal superinfections.
Constitutional symptoms, such as fever, weight loss, hemoptysis (coughing up blood), and fatigue may herald one of these infections or the onset of
lung cancer.
1.3.2. Physical Examination—rales, rhonchi, or other abnormal lung findings in relation to illnesses present. Clubbing of the digits, signs of heart
failure, and cor pulmonale may be present in severe lung disease.
1.3.3. Spirometry—restrictive or mixed restrictive/obstructive pattern.
1.3.4. Chest X-ray—small rounded and/or irregular opacities bilaterally. Large opacities and lung abscesses may indicate infections, lung cancer,
or progression to complicated silicosis, also termed progressive massive fibrosis.
1.3.5. Clinical Course—accelerated silicosis has a rapid, severe course. Under the respirable crystalline silica standard, the PLHCP can
recommend referral to a Board Certified Specialist in either Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine, as deemed appropriate, and referral to a
Specialist is recommended whenever the diagnosis of accelerated silicosis is being considered.
1.4. Acute Silicosis. Acute silicosis is a rare disease caused by inhalation of extremely high levels of respirable crystalline silica particles. The
pathology is similar to alveolar proteinosis with lipoproteinaceous material accumulating in the alveoli. Acute silicosis develops rapidly, often, within a
few months to less than 2 years of exposure, and is almost always fatal. The clinical presentation of acute silicosis is as follows:
1.4.1. Symptoms—sudden, progressive, and severe shortness of breath. Constitutional symptoms are frequently present and include fever, weight
loss, fatigue, productive cough, hemoptysis (coughing up blood), and pleuritic chest pain.
1.4.2. Physical Examination—dyspnea at rest, cyanosis, decreased breath sounds, inspiratory rales, clubbing of the digits, and fever.
1.4.3. Spirometry—restrictive or mixed restrictive/obstructive pattern.
1.4.4. Chest X-ray—diffuse haziness of the lungs bilaterally early in the disease. As the disease progresses, the “ground glass” appearance of
interstitial fibrosis will appear.
1.4.5. Clinical Course—employees with acute silicosis are at especially high risk of TB activation, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and
fungal superinfections. Acute silicosis is immediately life-threatening. The employee should be urgently referred to a Board Certified Specialist in
Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine for evaluation and treatment. Although any case of silicosis indicates a breakdown in prevention, a case
of acute or accelerated silicosis implies a profoundly high level of silica exposure and may mean that other employees are currently exposed to
dangerous levels of silica.
1.5. COPD. COPD, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema, has been documented in silica-exposed employees, including those who do not
develop silicosis. Periodic spirometry tests are performed to evaluate each employee for progressive changes consistent with the development of
COPD. In addition to evaluating spirometry results of individual employees over time, PLHCPs may want to be aware of general trends in spirometry
results for groups of employees from the same workplace to identify possible problems that might exist at that workplace. (See Section 2 of this
Appendix on Medical Surveillance for further discussion.) Heart disease may develop secondary to lung diseases such as COPD. A recent study by Liu
et al. 2014 noted a significant exposure-response trend between cumulative silica exposure and heart disease deaths, primarily due to pulmonary
heart disease, such as cor pulmonale.
1.6. Renal and Immune System. Silica exposure has been associated with several types of kidney disease, including glomerulonephritis, nephrotic
syndrome, and end stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Silica exposure has also been associated with other autoimmune conditions, including
progressive systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis. Studies note an association between employees with silicosis
and serologic markers for autoimmune diseases, including antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and immune complexes (Jalloul and Banks 2007;
Shtraichman et al. 2015).
1.7. TB and Other Infections. Silica-exposed employees with latent TB are 3 to 30 times more likely to develop active pulmonary TB infection (ATS
1997; Rees and Murray 2007). Although respirable crystalline silica exposure does not cause TB infection, individuals with latent TB infection are at
increased risk for activation of disease if they have higher levels of respirable crystalline silica exposure, greater profusion of radiographic
abnormalities, or a diagnosis of silicosis. Demographic characteristics, such as immigration from some countries, are associated with increased rates
of latent TB infection. PLHCPs can review the latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) information on TB incidence rates and high risk
populations online (See Section 5 of this Appendix). Additionally, silica-exposed employees are at increased risk for contracting nontuberculous
mycobacterial infections, including Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare and Mycobacterium kansaii.
1.8. Lung Cancer. The National Toxicology Program has listed respirable crystalline silica as a known human carcinogen since 2000 (NTP 2014).
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (2012) has also classified silica as Group 1 (carcinogenic to humans). Several studies have
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

10/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

indicated that the risk of lung cancer from exposure to respirable crystalline silica and smoking is greater than additive (Brown 2009; Liu et al. 2013).
Employees should be counseled on smoking cessation.

2. M

S

PLHCPs who manage silica medical surveillance programs should have a thorough understanding of the many silica-related diseases and health
effects outlined in Section 1 of this Appendix. At each clinical encounter, the PLHCP should consider silica-related health outcomes, with particular
vigilance for acute and accelerated silicosis. In this Section, the required components of medical surveillance under the respirable crystalline silica
standard are reviewed, along with additional guidance and recommendations for PLHCPs performing medical surveillance examinations for silicaexposed employees.
2.1. History.
2.1.1. The respirable crystalline silica standard requires the following: A medical and work history, with emphasis on: Past, present, and
anticipated exposure to respirable crystalline silica, dust, and other agents affecting the respiratory system; any history of respiratory system
dysfunction, including signs and symptoms of respiratory disease (e.g., shortness of breath, cough, wheezing); history of TB; and smoking status and
history.
2.1.2. Further, the employer must provide the PLHCP with the following information:
2.1.2.1. A description of the employee's former, current, and anticipated duties as they relate to the employee's occupational exposure to
respirable crystalline silica;
2.1.2.2. The employee's former, current, and anticipated levels of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
2.1.2.3. A description of any personal protective equipment used or to be used by the employee, including when and for how long the employee
has used or will use that equipment; and
2.1.2.4. Information from records of employment-related medical examinations previously provided to the employee and currently within the control
of the employer.
2.1.3. Additional guidance and recommendations: A history is particularly important both in the initial evaluation and in periodic examinations.
Information on past and current medical conditions (particularly a history of kidney disease, cardiac disease, connective tissue disease, and other
immune diseases), medications, hospitalizations and surgeries may uncover health risks, such as immune suppression, that could put an employee at
increased health risk from exposure to silica. This information is important when counseling the employee on risks and safe work practices related to
silica exposure.
2.2. Physical Examination.
2.2.1. The respirable crystalline silica standard requires the following: A physical examination, with special emphasis on the respiratory system.
The physical examination must be performed at the initial examination and every three years thereafter.
2.2.2. Additional guidance and recommendations: Elements of the physical examination that can assist the PHLCP include: An examination of the
cardiac system, an extremity examination (for clubbing, cyanosis, edema, or joint abnormalities), and an examination of other pertinent organ systems
identified during the history.
2.3. TB Testing.
2.3.1. The respirable crystalline silica standard requires the following: Baseline testing for TB on initial examination.
2.3.2. Additional guidance and recommendations:
2.3.2.1. Current CDC guidelines (See Section 5 of this Appendix) should be followed for the application and interpretation of Tuberculin skin tests
(TST). The interpretation and documentation of TST reactions should be performed within 48 to 72 hours of administration by trained PLHCPs.
2.3.2.2. PLHCPs may use alternative TB tests, such as interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), if sensitivity and specificity are comparable to TST
(Mazurek et al. 2010; Slater et al. 2013). PLHCPs can consult the current CDC guidelines for acceptable tests for latent TB infection.
2.3.2.3. The silica standard allows the PLHCP to order additional tests or test at a greater frequency than required by the standard, if deemed
appropriate. Therefore, PLHCPs might perform periodic (e.g., annual) TB testing as appropriate, based on employees' risk factors. For example,
according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the diagnosis of silicosis or exposure to silica for 25 years or more are indications for annual TB
testing (ATS 1997). PLHCPs should consult the current CDC guidance on risk factors for TB (See Section 5 of this Appendix).
2.3.2.4. Employees with positive TB tests and those with indeterminate test results should be referred to the appropriate agency or specialist,
depending on the test results and clinical picture. Agencies, such as local public health departments, or specialists, such as a pulmonary or infectious
disease specialist, may be the appropriate referral. Active TB is a nationally notifiable disease. PLHCPs should be aware of the reporting requirements
for their region. All States have TB Control Offices that can be contacted for further information. (See Section 5 of this Appendix for links to CDC's TB
resources and State TB Control Offices.)
2.3.2.5. The following public health principles are key to TB control in the U.S. (ATS-CDC-IDSA 2005):
(1) Prompt detection and reporting of persons who have contracted active TB;
(2) Prevention of TB spread to close contacts of active TB cases;
(3) Prevention of active TB in people with latent TB through targeted testing and treatment; and
(4) Identification of settings at high risk for TB transmission so that appropriate infection-control measures can be implemented.
2.4. Pulmonary Function Testing.
2.4.1. The respirable crystalline silica standard requires the following: Pulmonary function testing must be performed on the initial examination and
every three years thereafter. The required pulmonary function test is spirometry and must include forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

11/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

in one second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC ratio. Testing must be administered by a spirometry technician with a current certificate from a National Institute
for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH)-approved spirometry course.
2.4.2. Additional guidance and recommendations: Spirometry provides information about individual respiratory status and can be used to track an
employee's respiratory status over time or as a surveillance tool to follow individual and group respiratory function. For quality results, the ATS and the
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) recommend use of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES III) values, and ATS publishes recommendations for spirometry equipment (Miller et al. 2005; Townsend 2011; Redlich et al. 2014).
OSHA's publication, Spirometry Testing in Occupational Health Programs: Best Practices for Healthcare Professionals, provides helpful guidance (See
Section 5 of this Appendix). Abnormal spirometry results may warrant further clinical evaluation and possible recommendations for limitations on the
employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
2.5. Chest X-ray.
2.5.1. The respirable crystalline silica standard requires the following: A single posteroanterior (PA) radiographic projection or radiograph of the
chest at full inspiration recorded on either film (no less than 14 x 17 inches and no more than 16 x 17 inches) or digital radiography systems. A chest Xray must be performed on the initial examination and every three years thereafter. The chest X-ray must be interpreted and classified according to the
International Labour Office (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses by a NIOSH-certified B Reader.
Chest radiography is necessary to diagnose silicosis, monitor the progression of silicosis, and identify associated conditions such as TB. If the B
reading indicates small opacities in a profusion of 1/0 or higher, the employee is to receive a recommendation for referral to a Board Certified Specialist
in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine.
2.5.2. Additional guidance and recommendations: Medical imaging has largely transitioned from conventional film-based radiography to digital
radiography systems. The ILO Guidelines for the Classification of Pneumoconioses has historically provided film-based chest radiography as a referent
standard for comparison to individual exams. However, in 2011, the ILO revised the guidelines to include a digital set of referent standards that were
derived from the prior film-based standards. To assist in assuring that digitally-acquired radiographs are at least as safe and effective as film
radiographs, NIOSH has prepared guidelines, based upon accepted contemporary professional recommendations (See Section 5 of this Appendix).
Current research from Laney et al. 2011 and Halldin et al. 2014 validate the use of the ILO digital referent images. Both studies conclude that the
results of pneumoconiosis classification using digital references are comparable to film-based ILO classifications. Current ILO guidance on radiography
for pneumoconioses and B-reading should be reviewed by the PLHCP periodically, as needed, on the ILO or NIOSH Web sites (See Section 5 of this
Appendix).
2.6. Other Testing. Under the respirable crystalline silica standards, the PLHCP has the option of ordering additional testing he or she deems
appropriate. Additional tests can be ordered on a case-by-case basis depending on individual signs or symptoms and clinical judgment. For example, if
an employee reports a history of abnormal kidney function tests, the PLHCP may want to order a baseline renal function tests (e.g., serum creatinine
and urinalysis). As indicated above, the PLHCP may order annual TB testing for silica-exposed employees who are at high risk of developing active TB
infections. Additional tests that PLHCPs may order based on findings of medical examinations include, but is not limited to, chest computerized
tomography (CT) scan for lung cancer or COPD, testing for immunologic diseases, and cardiac testing for pulmonary-related heart disease, such as
cor pulmonale.

3. R

R

3.1. PLHCP. The PLHCP designation refers to “an individual whose legally permitted scope of practice (i.e., license, registration, or certification)
allows him or her to independently provide or be delegated the responsibility to provide some or all of the particular health care services required” by
the respirable crystalline silica standard. The legally permitted scope of practice for the PLHCP is determined by each State. PLHCPs who perform
clinical services for a silica medical surveillance program should have a thorough knowledge of respirable crystalline silica-related diseases and
symptoms. Suspected cases of silicosis, advanced COPD, or other respiratory conditions causing impairment should be promptly referred to a Board
Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine.
Once the medical surveillance examination is completed, the employer must ensure that the PLHCP explains to the employee the results of the
medical examination and provides the employee with a written medical report within 30 days of the examination. The written medical report must
contain a statement indicating the results of the medical examination, including any medical condition(s) that would place the employee at increased
risk of material impairment to health from exposure to respirable crystalline silica and any medical conditions that require further evaluation or
treatment. In addition, the PLHCP's written medical report must include any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators, any
recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica, and a statement that the employee should be examined by a
Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational medicine if the chest X-ray is classified as 1/0 or higher by the B Reader, or if referral
to a Specialist is otherwise deemed appropriate by the PLHCP.
The PLHCP should discuss all findings and test results and any recommendations regarding the employee's health, worksite safety and health
practices, and medical referrals for further evaluation, if indicated. In addition, it is suggested that the PLHCP offer to provide the employee with a
complete copy of their examination and test results, as some employees may want this information for their own records or to provide to their personal
physician or a future PLHCP. Employees are entitled to access their medical records.
Under the respirable crystalline silica standard, the employer must ensure that the PLHCP provides the employer with a written medical opinion
within 30 days of the employee examination, and that the employee also gets a copy of the written medical opinion for the employer within 30 days.
The PLHCP may choose to directly provide the employee a copy of the written medical opinion. This can be particularly helpful to employees, such as
construction employees, who may change employers frequently. The written medical opinion can be used by the employee as proof of up-to-date
medical surveillance. The following lists the elements of the written medical report for the employee and written medical opinion for the employer.
(Sample forms for the written medical report for the employee, the written medical opinion for the employer, and the written authorization are provided
in Section 7 of this Appendix.)
3.1.1. The written medical report for the employee must include the following information:
3.1.1.1. A statement indicating the results of the medical examination, including any medical condition(s) that would place the employee at
increased risk of material impairment to health from exposure to respirable crystalline silica and any medical conditions that require further evaluation
or treatment;
3.1.1.2. Any recommended limitations upon the employee's use of a respirator;
3.1.1.3. Any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and
3.1.1.4. A statement that the employee should be examined by a Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine,
where the standard requires or where the PLHCP has determined such a referral is necessary. The standard requires referral to a Board Certified
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

12/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine for a chest X-ray B reading indicating small opacities in a profusion of 1/0 or higher, or if the
PHLCP determines that referral to a Specialist is necessary for other silica-related findings.
3.1.2. The PLHCP's written medical opinion for the employer must include only the following information:
3.1.2.1. The date of the examination;
3.1.2.2. A statement that the examination has met the requirements of this section; and
3.1.2.3. Any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators.
3.1.2.4. If the employee provides the PLHCP with written authorization, the written opinion for the employer shall also contain either or both of the
following:
(1) Any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica; and
(2) A statement that the employee should be examined by a Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine if the chest
X-ray provided in accordance with this section is classified as 1/0 or higher by the B Reader, or if referral to a Specialist is otherwise deemed
appropriate.
3.1.2.5. In addition to the above referral for abnormal chest X-ray, the PLHCP may refer an employee to a Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary
Disease or Occupational Medicine for other findings of concern during the medical surveillance examination if these findings are potentially related to
silica exposure.
3.1.2.6. Although the respirable crystalline silica standard requires the employer to ensure that the PLHCP explains the results of the medical
examination to the employee, the standard does not mandate how this should be done. The written medical opinion for the employer could contain a
statement that the PLHCP has explained the results of the medical examination to the employee.
3.2. Medical Specialists. The silica standard requires that all employees with chest X-ray B readings of 1/0 or higher be referred to a Board
Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine. If the employee has given written authorization for the employer to be informed,
then the employer shall make available a medical examination by a Specialist within 30 days after receiving the PLHCP's written medical opinion.
3.2.1. The employer must provide the following information to the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine:
3.2.1.1. A description of the employee's former, current, and anticipated duties as they relate to the employee's occupational exposure to
respirable crystalline silica;
3.2.1.2. The employee's former, current, and anticipated levels of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica;
3.2.1.3. A description of any personal protective equipment used or to be used by the employee, including when and for how long the employee
has used or will use that equipment; and
3.2.1.4. Information from records of employment-related medical examinations previously provided to the employee and currently within the control
of the employer.
3.2.2. The PLHCP should make certain that, with written authorization from the employee, the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or
Occupational Medicine has any other pertinent medical and occupational information necessary for the specialist's evaluation of the employee's
condition.
3.2.3. Once the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine has evaluated the employee, the employer must
ensure that the Specialist explains to the employee the results of the medical examination and provides the employee with a written medical report
within 30 days of the examination. The employer must also ensure that the Specialist provides the employer with a written medical opinion within 30
days of the employee examination. (Sample forms for the written medical report for the employee, the written medical opinion for the employer and the
written authorization are provided in Section 7 of this Appendix.)
3.2.4. The Specialist's written medical report for the employee must include the following information:
3.2.4.1. A statement indicating the results of the medical examination, including any medical condition(s) that would place the employee at
increased risk of material impairment to health from exposure to respirable crystalline silica and any medical conditions that require further evaluation
or treatment;
3.2.4.2. Any recommended limitations upon the employee's use of a respirator; and
3.2.4.3. Any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
3.2.5. The Specialist's written medical opinion for the employer must include the following information:
3.2.5.1. The date of the examination; and
3.2.5.2. Any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators.
3.2.5.3. If the employee provides the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine with written authorization, the
written medical opinion for the employer shall also contain any recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
3.2.5.4. Although the respirable crystalline silica standard requires the employer to ensure that the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary
Disease or Occupational Medicine explains the results of the medical examination to the employee, the standard does not mandate how this should be
done. The written medical opinion for the employer could contain a statement that the Specialist has explained the results of the medical examination
to the employee.
3.2.6. After evaluating the employee, the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine should provide feedback to
the PLHCP as appropriate, depending on the reason for the referral. OSHA believes that because the PLHCP has the primary relationship with the
employer and employee, the Specialist may want to communicate his or her findings to the PLHCP and have the PLHCP simply update the original
medical report for the employee and medical opinion for the employer. This is permitted under the standard, so long as all requirements and time
deadlines are met.
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

13/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

3.3. Public Health Professionals. PLHCPs might refer employees or consult with public health professionals as a result of silica medical
surveillance. For instance, if individual cases of active TB are identified, public health professionals from state or local health departments may assist in
diagnosis and treatment of individual cases and may evaluate other potentially affected persons, including coworkers. Because silica-exposed
employees are at increased risk of progression from latent to active TB, treatment of latent infection is recommended. The diagnosis of active TB,
acute or accelerated silicosis, or other silica-related diseases and infections should serve as sentinel events suggesting high levels of exposure to
silica and may require consultation with the appropriate public health agencies to investigate potentially similarly exposed coworkers to assess for
disease clusters. These agencies include local or state health departments or OSHA. In addition, NIOSH can provide assistance upon request through
their Health Hazard Evaluation program. (See Section 5 of this Appendix)

4. C

O

C

The information that is provided from the PLHCP to the employee and employer under the medical surveillance section of OSHA's respirable
crystalline silica standard differs from that of medical surveillance requirements in previous OSHA standards. The standard requires two separate
written communications, a written medical report for the employee and a written medical opinion for the employer. The confidentiality requirements for
the written medical opinion are more stringent than in past standards. For example, the information the PLHCP can (and must) include in his or her
written medical opinion for the employer is limited to: The date of the examination, a statement that the examination has met the requirements of this
section, and any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators. If the employee provides written authorization for the disclosure of any
limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica, then the PLHCP can (and must) include that information in the written medical
opinion for the employer as well. Likewise, with the employee's written authorization, the PLHCP can (and must) disclose the PLHCP's referral
recommendation (if any) as part of the written medical opinion for the employer. However, the opinion to the employer must not include information
regarding recommended limitations on the employee's exposure to respirable crystalline silica or any referral recommendations without the employee's
written authorization.
The standard also places limitations on the information that the Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine can
provide to the employer without the employee's written authorization. The Specialist's written medical opinion for the employer, like the PLHCP's
opinion, is limited to (and must contain): The date of the examination and any recommended limitations on the employee's use of respirators. If the
employee provides written authorization, the written medical opinion can (and must) also contain any limitations on the employee's exposure to
respirable crystalline silica.
The PLHCP should discuss the implication of signing or not signing the authorization with the employee (in a manner and language that he or she
understands) so that the employee can make an informed decision regarding the written authorization and its consequences. The discussion should
include the risk of ongoing silica exposure, personal risk factors, risk of disease progression, and possible health and economic consequences. For
instance, written authorization is required for a PLHCP to advise an employer that an employee should be referred to a Board Certified Specialist in
Pulmonary Disease or Occupational Medicine for evaluation of an abnormal chest X-ray (B-reading 1/0 or greater). If an employee does not sign an
authorization, then the employer will not know and cannot facilitate the referral to a Specialist and is not required to pay for the Specialist's
examination. In the rare case where an employee is diagnosed with acute or accelerated silicosis, co-workers are likely to be at significant risk of
developing those diseases as a result of inadequate controls in the workplace. In this case, the PLHCP and/or Specialist should explain this concern to
the affected employee and make a determined effort to obtain written authorization from the employee so that the PLHCP and/or Specialist can contact
the employer.
Finally, without written authorization from the employee, the PLHCP and/or Board Certified Specialist in Pulmonary Disease or Occupational
Medicine cannot provide feedback to an employer regarding control of workplace silica exposure, at least in relation to an individual employee.
However, the regulation does not prohibit a PLHCP and/or Specialist from providing an employer with general recommendations regarding exposure
controls and prevention programs in relation to silica exposure and silica-related illnesses, based on the information that the PLHCP receives from the
employer such as employees' duties and exposure levels. Recommendations may include increased frequency of medical surveillance examinations,
additional medical surveillance components, engineering and work practice controls, exposure monitoring and personal protective equipment. For
instance, more frequent medical surveillance examinations may be a recommendation to employers for employees who do abrasive blasting with silica
because of the high exposures associated with that operation.
ACOEM's Code of Ethics and discussion is a good resource to guide PLHCPs regarding the issues discussed in this section (See Section 5 of this
Appendix).

5. R
5.1. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM):
ACOEM Code of Ethics. Accessed at:http://www.acoem.org/codeofconduct.aspx
Raymond, L.W. and Wintermeyer, S. (2006) ACOEM evidenced-based statement on medical surveillance of silica-exposed workers: Medical
surveillance of workers exposed to crystalline silica. J Occup Environ Med, 48, 95-101.
5.2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Tuberculosis Web page: http://www.cdc.gov/tb/default.htm
State TB Control Offices Web page: http://www.cdc.gov/tb/links/tboffices.htm
Tuberculosis Laws and Policies Web page: http://www.cdc.gov/tb/programs/laws/default.htm
CDC. (2013). Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Guide for Primary Health Care Providers. Accessed at:
http://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/ltbi/pdf/targetedltbi.pdf
5.3. International Labour Organization
International Labour Office (ILO). (2011) Guidelines for the use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses, Revised
edition 2011. Occupational Safety and Health Series No. 22: http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS__168260/lang-en/index.htm
5.4. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
NIOSH B Reader Program Web page. (Information on interpretation of X-rays for silicosis and a list of certified B-readers). Accessed at:
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/chestradiography/breader-info.html

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

14/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

NIOSH Guideline (2011). Application of Digital Radiography for the Detection and Classification of Pneumoconiosis. NIOSH publication number 2011198. Accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2011-198/
NIOSH Hazard Review (2002), Health Effects of Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica. NIOSH publication number 2002-129:
Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-129/
NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations Programs. (Information on the NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) program, how to request an HHE and how
to look up an HHE report). Accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/
5.5. National Industrial Sand Association:
Occupational Health Program for Exposure to Crystalline Silica in the Industrial Sand Industry. National Industrial Sand Association, 2nd ed. 2010. Can
be ordered at: http://www.sand.org/silica-occupational-health-program
5.6. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Contacting OSHA: http://www.osha.gov/html/Feed__Back.html
OSHA's Clinicians Web page. (OSHA resources, regulations and links to help clinicians navigate OSHA's Web site and aid clinicians in caring for
workers.) Accessed at: http://www.osha.gov/dts/oom/clinicians/index.html
OSHA's Safety and Health Topics Web page on Silica. Accessed at: http://www.osha.gov/dsg/topics/silicacrystalline/index.html
OSHA (2013). Spirometry Testing in Occupational Health Programs: Best Practices for Healthcare Professionals. (OSHA 3637-03 2013). Accessed at:
http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3637.pdf
OSHA/NIOSH (2011). Spirometry: OSHA/NIOSH Spirometry InfoSheet (OSHA 3415-1-11). (Provides guidance to employers). Accessed at
http://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3415.pdf
OSHA/NIOSH (2011) Spirometry: OSHA/NIOSH Spirometry Worker Info. (OSHA 3418-3-11). Accessed at
http://www.osha.gov/Publications/osha3418.pdf
5.7. Other
Steenland, K. and Ward E. (2014). Silica: A lung carcinogen. CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 63-69. (This article reviews not only silica and lung cancer but also
all the known silica-related health effects. Further, the authors provide guidance to clinicians on medical surveillance of silica-exposed workers
and worker counselling on safety practices to minimize silica exposure.)

6. R
American Thoracic Society (ATS). Medical Section of the American Lung Association (1997). Adverse effects of crystalline silica exposure. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med, 155, 761-765.
American Thoracic Society (ATS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) (2005). Controlling Tuberculosis
in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 54(RR12), 1-81. Accessed at:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5412a1.htm
Brown, T. (2009). Silica exposure, smoking, silicosis and lung cancer—complex interactions. Occupational Medicine, 59, 89-95.
Halldin, C.N., Petsonk, E.L., and Laney, A.S. (2014). Validation of the International Labour Office digitized standard images for recognition and
classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis. Acad Radiol, 21, 305-311.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012). Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: Arsenic, Metals, Fibers, and
Dusts Silica Dust, Crystalline, in the Form of Quartz or Cristobalite. A Review of Human Carcinogens. Volume 100 C. Geneva, Switzerland:
World Health Organization.
Jalloul, A.S. and Banks D.E. (2007). Chapter 23. The health effects of silica exposure. In: Rom, W.N. and Markowitz, S.B. (Eds). Environmental and
Occupational Medicine, 4th edition. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 365-387.
Kramer, M.R., Blanc, P.D., Fireman, E., Amital, A., Guber, A., Rahman, N.A., and Shitrit, D. (2012). Artifical stone silicosis: Disease resurgence among
artificial stone workers. Chest, 142, 419-424.
Laney, A.S., Petsonk, E.L., and Attfield, M.D. (2011). Intramodality and intermodality comparisons of storage phosphor computed radiography and
conventional film-screen radiography in the recognition of small pneumonconiotic opacities. Chest, 140, 1574-1580.
Liu, Y., Steenland, K., Rong, Y., Hnizdo, E., Huang, X., Zhang, H., Shi, T., Sun, Y., Wu, T., and Chen, W. (2013). Exposure-response analysis and risk
assessment for lung cancer in relationship to silica exposure: A 44-year cohort study of 34,018 workers. Am J Epi, 178, 1424-1433.
Liu, Y., Rong, Y., Steenland, K., Christiani, D.C., Huang, X., Wu, T., and Chen, W. (2014). Long-term exposure to crystalline silica and risk of heart
disease mortality. Epidemiology, 25, 689-696.
Mazurek, G.H., Jereb, J., Vernon, A., LoBue, P., Goldberg, S., Castro, K. (2010). Updated guidelines for using interferon gamma release assays to
detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection—United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 59(RR05), 1-25.
Miller, M.R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C.P., Gustafsson, P., Jensen, R.,
Johnson, D.C., MacIntyre, N., McKay, R., Navajas, D., Pedersen, O.F., Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., and Wanger, J. (2005). American Thoracic
Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) Task Force: Standardisation of Spirometry. Eur Respir J, 26, 319-338.
National Toxicology Program (NTP) (2014). Report on Carcinogens, Thirteenth Edition. Silica, Crystalline (respirable Size). Research Triangle Park,
NC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles/silica.pdf
Occupational Safety and Health Administration/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA/NIOSH) (2012). Hazard Alert. Worker
exposure to silica during hydraulic fracturing.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA/NIOSH) (2015). Hazard alert. Worker
exposure to silica during countertop manufacturing, finishing, and installation. (OSHA-HA-3768-2015).
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

15/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

Redlich, C.A., Tarlo, S.M., Hankinson, J.L., Townsend, M.C, Eschenbacher, W.L., Von Essen, S.G., Sigsgaard, T., Weissman, D.N. (2014). Official
American Thoracic Society technical standards: Spirometry in the occupational setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 189, 984-994.
Rees, D. and Murray, J. (2007). Silica, silicosis and tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 11(5), 474-484.
Shtraichman, O., Blanc, P.D., Ollech, J.E., Fridel, L., Fuks, L., Fireman, E., and Kramer, M.R. (2015). Outbreak of autoimmune disease in silicosis
linked to artificial stone. Occup Med, 65, 444-450.
Slater, M.L., Welland, G., Pai, M., Parsonnet, J., and Banaei, N. (2013). Challenges with QuantiFERON-TB gold assay for large-scale, routine
screening of U.S. healthcare workers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 188,1005-1010.
Steenland, K., Mannetje, A., Boffetta, P., Stayner, L., Attfield, M., Chen, J., Dosemeci, M., DeKlerk, N., Hnizdo, E., Koskela, R., and Checkoway, H.
(2001). International Agency for Research on Cancer. Pooled exposure-response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts
of silica-exposed workers: An IARC multicentre study. Cancer Causes Control, 12(9): 773-84.
Steenland, K. and Ward E. (2014). Silica: A lung carcinogen. CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 63-69.
Townsend, M.C. ACOEM Guidance Statement. (2011). Spirometry in the occupational health setting—2011 Update. J Occup Environ Med, 53, 569584.

7. S

F

Three sample forms are provided. The first is a sample written medical report for the employee. The second is a sample written medical opinion
for the employer. And the third is a sample written authorization form that employees sign to clarify what information the employee is authorizing to be
released to the employer.

View or download PDF

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

16/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

View or download PDF

View or download PDF
[81 FR 16876, Mar. 25, 2016]
Need assistance?

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

17/18

10/2/2019

eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations

https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=20c9a87b8d225508565455663c0298ea&mc=true&node=se29.8.1926_11153&rgn=div8

18/18