The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the Wood Building Products
Surface Coating Industry applies to new and existing facilities
that perform surface coating of wood building products where the
total Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) emitted are greater than or
equal to 10 tons per year of any one HAP, or where the total HAPs
emitted are greater than or equal to 25 tons per year of any
combination of HAPs, and that use at least 4,170 liters (1,100
gallons) of coatings annually. New facilities include those that
commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction after the
date of the original proposal (June 21, 2002). This information is
being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
QQQQ. In general, all NESHAP require initial notifications,
performance tests, and semiannual compliance reports by the
owners/operators of the affected facilities. Owners/operators are
also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of
any failures to meet applicable standards, or any period during
which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications,
reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and
are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. Any
owner/operator subject to NESHAP shall maintain a file of
measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following
the date of measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All
reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the
event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the appropriate U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office. The final amendments to the rule
eliminate the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) exemption;
remove the SSM plan requirement; add electronic submittal of
notifications of compliance status, semiannual reports and
performance test reports; and make technical and editorial changes.
The remaining portions of the NESHAP are unchanged.
This ICR is prepared for final
RTR amendments to the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products (40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart QQQQ). These final RTR
amendments would: (1) adjust references to the Part 63 General
Provisions (40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart A) and revise provisions in
the NESHAP (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart QQQQ) to remove the SSM
exemption and SSM plan requirement; (2) add electronic submittal of
semiannual reports and performance test reports; and (3) make
technical and editorial changes. The number of affected facilities
changed from the previous ICR because of: (1) continued
consolidation and closures within the wood building products
industry; and (2) updates to the number of affected facilities
based on EPAs recent RTR efforts and subsequent updates from other
information sources. The burden estimate for reading and
understanding the rule requirements was increased to reflect the
actual time it would take industry to review the final rule
amendments. Burden estimates were added for the industry to prepare
for performance tests, report the results of the performance tests
through the ERT, and transition to submitting notifications and
semiannual reports through CEDRI. Burden estimates were removed for
developing SSM plans and submitting periodic SSM reports. Overall,
the reduction of affected facilities had a larger impact than the
specific cost increases cited above.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.