Download:
pdf |
pdfOMB No. 3117-0016/USITC No. 18-1-3844; Expiration Date: 6/30/2020
(No response is required if currently valid OMB control number is not displayed)
U.S. PRODUCERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
LOW MELT POLYESTER STAPLE FIBER FROM KOREA AND TAIWAN
This questionnaire must be received by the Commission by March 22, 2018
See last page for filing instructions.
The information called for in this questionnaire is for use by the United States International Trade Commission in
connection with its review of the antidumping duty investigations concerning low melt polyester staple fiber (PSF) from
Korea and Taiwan (Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1378-1379 (Final)). The information requested in the questionnaire is requested
under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII. This report is mandatory and failure to reply as directed can result
in a subpoena or other order to compel the submission of records or information in your firm’s possession (19 U.S.C. §
1333(a)).
Name of firm
Address
City
State
Zip Code
Website
Has your firm produced low melt PSF (as defined on the next page) at any time since January 1, 2015?
NO
(Sign the certification below and promptly return only this page of the questionnaire to the Commission)
YES
(Complete all parts of the questionnaire, and return the entire questionnaire to the Commission)
Return questionnaire via the Commission Drop Box by clicking on the following link:
https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/ (PIN: LMPSF)
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the information herein supplied in response to this questionnaire is complete and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief and understand that the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the Commission. By
means of this certification I also grant consent for the Commission, and its employees and contract personnel, to use the
information provided in this questionnaire and throughout this proceeding in any other import-injury proceedings or reviews
conducted by the Commission on the same or similar merchandise.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceedings may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits,
reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C.
Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. I understand that all
contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Name of Authorized Official
Title of Authorized Official
Date
Phone:
Signature
Email address
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire - Low melt PSF
Page 2
PART I.—GENERAL INFORMATION
Background.--This proceeding was instituted in response to a petition filed on June 27, 2017, by Nan Ya
Plastics Corporation, America, Livingston, New Jersey. Antidumping duties may be assessed on the
subject imports as a result of these proceedings if the Commission makes an affirmative determination
of injury, threat, or material retardation, and if the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) makes
an affirmative determination of dumping. Questionnaires and other information pertinent to this
proceeding are available at
https://usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2018/low_melt_polyester_staple_fiber_korea_and_taiwan/fina
l.htm
Low melt polyester staple fiber covered by these investigations is synthetic staple fibers, not carded or
combed, specifically bi-component polyester fibers having a polyester fiber component that melts at a
lower temperature than the other polyester fiber component (“low melt PSF”). The scope includes bicomponent polyester staple fibers of any denier or cut length. The subject merchandise may be coated,
usually with a finish or dye, or not coated.
The following merchandise is excluded from the scope: (1) polyester staple fiber equal to or greater than
3.3 decitex (greater than 3 denier, inclusive) that are not bi-component fiber, currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at statistical reporting numbers 5503.20.0045 and
5503.20.0065; (2) polyester staple fiber of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) that are not bicomponent fiber, currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at
subheadings 5503.20.0025.
Low melt polyester staple fiber is classifiable under statistical reporting number 5503.20.0015 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is
dispositive.
Reporting of information.--If information is not readily available from your records in exactly the form
requested, furnish carefully prepared estimates. If your firm is completing more than one questionnaire
in connection with this proceeding (i.e., a producer, importer, and/or purchaser questionnaire), you
need not respond to duplicated questions in the questionnaires.
Confidentiality.--The commercial and financial data furnished in response to this questionnaire that
reveal the individual operations of your firm will be treated as confidential by the Commission to the
extent that such data are not otherwise available to the public and will not be disclosed except as may
be required by law (see 19 U.S.C. § 1677f). Such confidential information will not be published in a
manner that will reveal the individual operations of your firm; however, general characterizations of
numerical business proprietary information (such as discussion of trends) will be treated as confidential
business information only at the request of the submitter for good cause shown.
Verification.--The information submitted in this questionnaire is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. To facilitate possible verification of data, please keep all of your files, worksheets, and
supporting documents used in the preparation of the questionnaire response. Please also retain a copy
of the final document that you submit.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 3
Release of information.--The information provided by your firm in response to this questionnaire, as
well as any other business proprietary information submitted by your firm to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding, may become subject to, and released under, the administrative
protective order provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1677f) and section 207.7 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.7). This means that certain lawyers and
other authorized individuals may temporarily be given access to the information for use in connection
with this proceeding or other import-injury proceedings conducted by the Commission on the same or
similar merchandise; those individuals would be subject to severe penalties if the information were
divulged to unauthorized individuals.
I-1.
OMB statistics.--Please report below the actual number of hours required and the cost to your
firm of completing this questionnaire.
Hours
Dollars
The questions in this questionnaire have been reviewed with market participants to ensure that
issues of concern are adequately addressed and that data requests are sufficient, meaningful,
and as limited as possible. Public reporting burden for this questionnaire is estimated to average
50 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering data, and
completing and reviewing the questionnaire.
We welcome comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate, suggestions for
reducing the burden, and any suggestions for improving this questionnaire. Please attach such
comments to your response or send to the Office of Investigations, USITC, 500 E St. SW,
Washington, DC 20436.
I-1b.
TAA information release.--In the event that the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC)
makes an affirmative final determination in this proceeding, do you consent to the USITC's
release of your contact information (company name, address, contact person, telephone
number, email address) appearing on the front page of this questionnaire to the Departments of
Commerce, Labor, and Agriculture, as applicable, so that your firm and its workers can be made
eligible for benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program?
Yes
No
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
I-2.
Page 4
Establishments covered.--Provide the city, state, zip code, and brief description of each
establishment covered by this questionnaire. If your firm is publicly traded, please specify the
stock exchange and trading symbol in the footnote to the table. Firms operating more than one
establishment should combine the data for all establishments into a single report.
“Establishment”--Each facility of a firm involved in the production of low melt PSF, including
auxiliary facilities operated in conjunction with (whether or not physically separate from) such
facilities.
Establishments
Covered1
City, State
Zip (5 digit)
Description
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
I-3.
Additional discussion on establishments consolidated in this questionnaire:
Petition support.--Does your firm support or oppose the petition?
Country
Support
Oppose
Take no position
Korea
Taiwan
I-4.
Ownership.--Is your firm owned, in whole or in part, by any other firm?
No
Firm name
Yes--List the following information.
Address
Extent of
ownership
(percent)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
I-5.
Related importers/exporters.--Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or
foreign, that are engaged in importing low melt PSF into the United States or that are engaged
in exporting low melt PSF to the United States?
No
Firm name
I-6.
Page 5
Yes--List the following information.
Country
Affiliation
Related producers.--Does your firm have any related firms, either domestic or foreign, that are
engaged in the production of low melt PSF?
No
Firm name
Yes--List the following information.
Country
Affiliation
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 6
PART II.--TRADE AND RELATED INFORMATION
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from Chris Robinson (202-2052542, [email protected]). Supply all data requested on a calendar-year basis.
II-1.
Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part II.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
II-2.
Changes in operations.--Please indicate whether your firm has experienced any of the following
changes in relation to the production of low melt PSF since January 1, 2015.
Check as many as appropriate.
Plant openings
Plant closings
Relocations
Expansions
Acquisitions
Consolidations
Prolonged shutdowns or
production curtailments
Revised labor agreements
Other (e.g., technology)
If checked, please describe; leave blank if not
applicable.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-3a.
Page 7
Production using same machinery.--Please report your firm’s production of products made on
the same equipment and machinery used to produce low melt PSF, and the combined
production capacity on this shared equipment and machinery in the periods indicated.
“Overall production capacity” or “capacity” – The level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the specified periods. Assume
normal operating conditions (i.e., using equipment and machinery in place and ready to
operate; normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year) and time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup).
“Production” – All production in your U.S. establishment(s), including production consumed
internally within your firm and production for another firm under a toll agreement.
Quantity (in 1,000 pounds)
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
Overall production capacity
Production of:
Low melt PSF1
Other products
Total
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Data entered for production of low melt PSF will populate here once reported in question II-7.
Please identify these products:
.
II-3b.
Operating parameters.--The production capacity reported in II-3a is based on operating
per week,
weeks per year.
II-3c.
Capacity calculation.--Please describe the methodology used to calculate overall production
capacity reported in II-3a, and explain any changes in reported capacity.
II-3d.
Production constraints.--Please describe the constraint(s) that set the limit(s) on your firm’s
production capacity.
hours
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-3e.
Page 8
Product shifting.--Is your firm able to switch production (capacity) between low melt PSF and other
products using the same equipment and/or labor?
No
Yes-- (i.e., have produced other products or are able to produce other
products). Please identify other actual or potential products:
.
II-3f.
Product shifting factors.--Please describe the factors that affect your firm’s ability to shift
production capacity between products (e.g., time, cost, relative price change, etc.), and the degree
to which these factors enhance or constrain such shifts.
II-3g.
Production process/configuration.—What production methods does your firm use to make low
melt PSF? (Check as many as are applicable to your operation)
Core-sheath
II-4.
Side-by-side
Tolling.--Since January 1, 2015, has your firm been involved in a toll agreement regarding the
production of low melt PSF?
“Toll agreement”--Agreement between two firms whereby the first firm furnishes the raw
materials and the second firm uses the raw materials to produce a product that it then returns
to the first firm with a charge for processing costs, overhead, etc.
No
Yes
If yes-- Please describe the toll arrangement(s) and name the firm(s)
involved.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-5.
Page 9
Foreign trade zones.-Firm's FTZ operations.--Does your firm produce low melt PSF in and/or admit low melt
PSF into a foreign trade zone (FTZ)?
(a)
“Foreign trade zone” is a designated location in the United States where firms utilize
special procedures that allow delayed or reduced customs duty payments on foreign
merchandise. A foreign trade zone must be designed as such pursuant to the rules and
procedures set forth in the Foreign-Trade Zones Act.
No
If yes-- Describe the nature of your firms operations in FTZs and identify
the specific FTZ site(s).
Other firms' FTZ operations.--To your knowledge, do any firms in the United States
import low melt PSF into a foreign trade zone (FTZ) for use in distribution of low melt
PSF and/or the production of downstream articles?
(b)
No
II-6.
Yes
Yes
If yes--Identify the firms and the FTZs.
Importer.--Since January 1, 2015, has your firm imported low melt PSF?
“Importer” – The person or firm primarily liable for the payment of any duties on the
merchandise, or an authorized agent acting on his behalf. The importer may be the consignee,
or the importer of record.
No
Yes
If yes-- COMPLETE AND RETURN A U.S. IMPORTERS’ QUESTIONNAIRE
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-7.
Page 10
Production, shipment, and inventory data.--Report your firm’s production capacity, production,
shipments, and inventories related to the production of low melt PSF in its U.S. establishment(s)
during the specified periods.
“Average production capacity” or “capacity” – The level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the specified periods. Assume
normal operating conditions (i.e., using equipment and machinery in place and ready to
operate; normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year) and time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup; and a typical or representative product mix).
“Production” – All production in your U.S. establishment(s), including production consumed
internally within your firm and production for another firm under a toll agreement.
“Commercial U.S. shipments” –Shipments made within the United States as a result of an arm’s
length commercial transaction in the ordinary course of business. Report net values (i.e., gross
sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned
goods) in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. your point of shipment.
“Internal consumption” – Product consumed internally by your firm. Such transactions are
valued at fair market value.
“Transfers to related firms” –Shipments made to related domestic firms. Such transactions are
valued at fair market value.
“Related firm” –A firm that your firm solely or jointly owns, manages, or otherwise controls.
“Export shipments” –Shipments to destinations outside the United States, including shipments
to related firms.
“Inventories”— Finished goods inventory, not raw materials or work-in-progress.
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records used in
the preparation of the trade data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding questions on the
trade data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies of the supporting
documents/records (such as production and sales schedules, inventory records, etc.) used to compile
these data.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-7.
Page 11
Production, shipment, and inventory data.--Continued
Quantity (in 1,000 pounds) and value (in $1,000)
Calendar years
Item
Average production capacity
(quantity) (A)
2015
2016
2017
1
Beginning-of-period inventories
(quantity) (B)
Production (quantity):(C)
U.S. shipments:
Commercial shipments
Quantity (D)
Value (E)
Internal consumption:2
Quantity (F)
Value2 (G)
Transfers to related firms:2
Quantity (H)
Value2 (I)
Export shipments:3
Quantity (J)
Value (K)
End-of-period inventories
(quantity) (L)
1
The production capacity reported is based on operating
hours per week,
weeks per year. Please
describe the methodology used to calculate production capacity, and explain any changes in reported capacity
.
2
Internal consumption and transfers to related firms must be valued at fair market value. In the event that your
firm uses a different basis for valuing these transactions, please specify that basis (e.g., cost, cost plus, etc.) and
provide value data using that basis for each of the periods noted above:
.
3
Identify your firm’s principal export markets:
.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-7.
Page 12
Production, shipment, and inventory data.--Continued
RECONCILIATION OF SHIPMENTS, PRODUCTION, AND INVENTORY.--Generally, the data reported for the
end-of-period inventories (i.e., line L) should be equal to the beginning-of-period inventories (i.e., line B),
plus production (i.e., line C), less total shipments (i.e., lines D, F, H, and J). Please ensure that any
differences are not due to data entry errors in completing this form, but rather reflect your firm’s actual
records; and, also provide explanations for any differences (e.g., theft, loss, damage, record systems
issues, etc.) if they exist.
Calendar years
Reconciliation
2015
2016
B + C – D – F – H – J – L = should equal
zero ("0") or provide an explanation.1
1
0
2017
0
0
Explanation if the calculated fields above are returning values other than zero (i.e., “0”) but are nonetheless accurate:
II-8.
.
Channels of distribution.--Report your firm’s commercial U.S. shipments by channel of
distribution.
Quantity (in 1,000 pounds)
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
Channels of distribution:
Commercial U.S. shipments:
To distributors (M)
To end users (N)
RECONCILIATION OF CHANNELS.--Please ensure that the quantities reported for channels of distribution
(i.e., lines M and N) in each time period equal the quantity reported for commercial U.S. shipments (i.e.,
line D) in each time period. If the calculated fields below return values other than zero (i.e., “0”), the
data reported must be revised prior to submission to the Commission.
Calendar years
Reconciliation
M + N – D = zero ("0"), if not revise.
2015
2016
0
2017
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-9.
Page 13
U.S. shipments of dyed/solution dyed/colored low melt PSF.--Report your firm’s U.S.
shipments (i.e., inclusive of commercial U.S. shipments, internal consumption, and transfers to
related firms) of dyed low melt PSF.
Dyed/solution dyed/colored low melt PSF.--Low melt PSF (as defined on page 2) that has
undergone a pigmentation process to add a specific color, such as black, to the fibers.
Quantity (1,000 pounds); Value (in $1,000)
Calendar year
Item
2015
2016
2017
U.S. shipments.—
Dyed low melt PSF
Quantity (O)
Value (P)
Other than dyed low melt PSF
Quantity (Q)
Value (R)
RECONCILIATION OF U.S. SHIPMENTS.--Please ensure that the quantities and values reported for U.S.
shipments in this question (i.e., lines O through R) here match the data for U.S. shipments reported in the
main trade grid question II-7 (i.e., lines D through I). If the calculated fields below return values other
than zero (i.e., “0”), the data reported must be revised prior to submission to the Commission.
Calendar year
Reconciliation
2015
2016
2017
Quantity: O + Q – D –F – H = zero
("0"), if not revise
0
0
0
Value: P + R – E –G – I = zero
("0"), if not revise
0
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-10.
Page 14
U.S. shipments of crystalline low melt PSF.--Report your firm’s U.S. shipments (i.e., inclusive of
commercial U.S. shipments, internal consumption, and transfers to related firms) of crystalline
low melt PSF.
Crystalline low melt PSF.--Low melt PSF (as defined on page 2) whose polymer molecules are in
a structured and repeated arrangement, and contains a chemical additive.
Quantity (1,000 pounds); Value (in $1,000)
Calendar year
Item
2015
2016
2017
U.S. shipments.—
Crystalline
Quantity (S)
Value (T)
Other than crystalline
Quantity (U)
Value (V)
RECONCILIATION OF U.S. SHIPMENTS.--Please ensure that the quantities and values reported for U.S.
shipments in this question (i.e., lines S through V) here match the data for U.S. shipments reported in the
main trade grid question II-7 (i.e., lines D through I). If the calculated fields below return values other
than zero (i.e., “0”), the data reported must be revised prior to submission to the Commission.
Calendar year
Reconciliation
2015
2016
2017
Quantity: S + U – D –F – H = zero
("0"), if not revise
0
0
0
Value: T + V – E –G – I = zero
("0"), if not revise
0
0
0
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-11.
Page 15
Employment data.--Report your firm’s employment-related data related to the production of
low melt PSF and provide an explanation for any trends in these data.
“Production and Related Workers” (PRWs) includes working supervisors and all nonsupervisory
workers (including group leaders and trainees) engaged in fabricating, processing, assembling,
inspecting, receiving, storage, handling, packing, warehousing, shipping, trucking, hauling,
maintenance, repair, janitorial and guard services, product development, auxiliary production
for plant’s own use (e.g., power plant), recordkeeping, and other services closely associated with
the above production operations. The average number employed may be computed by adding
the number of employees, both full time and part time, for the 12 pay periods ending closest to
the 15th of the month and divide that total by 12.
“Hours worked” includes time paid for sick leave, holidays, and vacation time. Include overtime
hours actually worked; do not convert overtime pay to its equivalent in straight time hours.
“Wages paid” –Total wages paid before deductions of any kind (e.g., withholding taxes, old-age
and unemployment insurance, group insurance, union dues, bonds, etc.). Include wages paid
directly by your firm for overtime, holidays, vacations, and sick leave.
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
Employment data:
Average number of PRWs (number) (W)
Hours worked by PRWs (1,000 hours) (X)
Wages paid to PRWs ($1,000) (Y)
Explanation of trends:
II-12.
Related firms.--If your firm reported transfers to related firms in question II-7, please indicate
the nature of the relationship between your firm and the related firms (e.g., joint venture,
wholly owned subsidiary), whether the transfers were priced at market value or by a nonmarket formula, whether your firm retained marketing rights to all transfers, and whether the
related firms also processed inputs from sources other than your firm.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
II-13.
Page 16
Purchases.--Other than direct imports, has your firm otherwise purchased low melt PSF since
January 1, 2015?
“Purchase” – A transaction to buy product from a U.S. corporate entity such as another U.S.
producer, a U.S. distributor, or a U.S. firm that has imported the product.
“Import” –A transaction to buy from a foreign supplier where your firm is the importer of
record.
No
Yes--Report such purchases below and explain the reasons for your firms'
purchases:
(Quantity in 1,000 pounds)
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
Purchases from U.S.
importers1 of low melt PSF
from—
Korea
Taiwan
All other sources
Purchases from domestic
producers1
Purchases from other
sources2
1
Please list the name of the importer(s) from which your firm purchased this product. If your firm’s import
suppliers differ by source, please identify the source for each listed supplier:
.
2
Please list the name of the producer(s) or U.S. distributor(s) from which your firm purchased this product:
.
II-14.
Other explanations.--If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part II
that did not provide a narrative response box, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your
firm had in providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with
the MS Word questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 17
PART III.--FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Address questions on this part of the questionnaire to Joanna Lo (202-205-1888, [email protected]).
III-1.
Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part III.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
Fax
III-2.
Accounting system.--Briefly describe your firm’s financial accounting system.
A.
When does your firm’s fiscal year end (month and day)?
If your firm’s fiscal year changed during the data-collection period, explain below:
Note.--Please note that we are requesting that firms report their financial data on a
calendar year basis.
B.1.
2.
3.
4.
Describe the lowest level of operations (e.g., plant, division, company-wide) for which
financial statements are prepared that include low melt PSF:
Does your firm prepare profit/loss statements for low melt PSF:
Yes
No
How often did your firm (or parent company) prepare financial statements (including
annual reports, 10Ks)? Please check relevant items below.
Audited,
unaudited,
annual reports,
10Ks,
Monthly,
quarterly,
semi-annually,
annually
Accounting basis:
GAAP,
cash,
tax, or
other comprehensive basis of
accounting (specify)
Note: As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records
used in the preparation of the financial data, as Commission staff may contact your firm
regarding questions on the financial data. The Commission may also request that your company
submit copies of the supporting documents/records (financial statements, including internal
profit-and-loss statements for the division or product group that includes low melt PSF, as well as
specific statements and worksheets) used to compile these data.
III-3.
Cost accounting system.--Briefly describe your firm’s cost accounting system (e.g., standard
cost, job order cost, etc.).
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 18
III-4.
Allocation basis.--Briefly describe your firm’s allocation basis, if any, for COGS, SG&A, and
interest expense and other income and expenses.
III-5.
Product listing.--Please list the products your firm produces in the facilities in which it produces
low melt PSF, and provide the share of net sales accounted for by these products in calendar
year 2017.
Products
Share of sales in 2017
Low melt PSF
%
%
%
%
%
III-6.
Does your firm purchase inputs (raw materials, labor, energy, or any services) used in the
production of low melt PSF from any related suppliers (e.g., inclusive of transactions between
related firms, divisions and/or other components within the same company)?
Yes--Continue to question III-7.
III-7.
No--Continue to question III-9a.
Inputs from related suppliers.--Please identify the inputs used in the production of low melt PSF
that your firm purchases from related suppliers and that are reflected in question III-9a. For
“Share of total COGS” please report this information by relevant input on the basis of calendar
year 2017. For “Input valuation” please describe the basis, as recorded in the company’s own
accounting system, of the purchase cost from the related supplier; e.g., the related supplier’s
actual cost, cost plus, negotiated transfer price to approximate fair market value.
Input
Related supplier
Share of total COGS
(percent)
Input valuation basis as recorded in the firm’s accounting books and records:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
III-8.
Page 19
Inputs purchased from related suppliers.--Please confirm that the inputs purchased from
related suppliers, as identified in III-7, were reported in III-9a (financial results on low melt PSF)
in a manner consistent with your firm’s accounting books and records.
Yes
No--In the space below, please report the valuation basis of inputs purchased from related
suppliers as reported in table III-9a.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 20
III-9a. Operations on low melt PSF.--Report the revenue and related cost information requested below
on the low melt PSF operations of your firm’s U.S. establishment(s).1 Do not report resales of
products. Note that internal consumption and transfers to related firms must be valued at fair
market value. Input purchases from related suppliers should be consistent with and based on
information in the firm’s accounting books and records. Provide data for your firm’s three
most recent calendar years.
Quantity (in 1,000 pounds) and value (in $1,000)
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
2
Net sales quantities:
Commercial sales (“CS”) (A)
Internal consumption (“IC”) (B)
Transfers to related firms (“Transfers”) (C)
Total net sales quantities (D)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Net sales values:
Commercial sales (E)
Internal consumption (F)
Transfers to related firms (G)
Total net sales values (H)
3
Cost of goods sold (COGS):
Raw materials (I)
Direct labor (J)
Other factory costs (K)
Total COGS (L)
Gross profit or (loss) (M)
Selling, general, and administrative (SG&A)
expenses:
Selling expenses (N)
General and administrative expenses (O)
Total SG&A expenses (P)
Operating income (loss) (Q)
Other expenses and income:
Interest expense (R)
All other expense items (S)
All other income items (T)
Net income or (loss) before income taxes (U)
Depreciation/amortization included above (V)
1
Include only sales (whether domestic or export) and costs related to your U.S. manufacturing operations.
Less discounts, returns, allowances, and prepaid freight. The quantities and values should approximate the corresponding
shipment quantities and values reported in Part II of this questionnaire.
3
COGS (whether for domestic or export sales) should include costs associated with CS, IC, and Transfers.
2
Note -- The table above contains calculations that will appear when you have entered data in the MS
Word form fields.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 21
III-9b. Raw materials for low melt PSF.—Please indicate the share of total raw material costs reported
in III-9a in 2017 for the following raw material inputs:
Products
PTA
MEG
Other1
Total (should sum to 100 percent)
Share of total raw
material costs
(percent)
%
%
%
0.0 %
1
Please indicate any other notable "other" raw materials not expressly identified above
and provide the share of the total raw material costs that they account for:
III-9c.
Financial data reconciliation.--The calculable line items from question III-9a (i.e., total net sales
quantities (row D) and values (row H), total COGS (row L), gross profit (or loss) (row M), total
SG&A (P), operating income (or loss) (row Q), and net income (or loss) (row U)) have been
calculated from the data submitted in the other line items. Do the calculated fields return the
correct data according to your firm's financial records ignoring non-material differences that
may arise due to rounding?
Yes
No--If the calculated fields do not show the correct data, please double check the
feeder data for data entry errors and revise.
Also, check signs accorded to the post operating income line items; the
three expense line items (rows R, S, and T) should report positive numbers
(i.e., expenses are positive and incomes or reversals are negative--instances
of the latter should be rare in those lines) while the income line items also
in most instances should have its value be a positive number (i.e., income is
positive, expenses or reversals are negative).
If after reviewing and potentially revising the feeder data your firm has
provided, the differences between your records and the calculated fields
persist please identify and discuss the differences in the space below.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 22
III-10. Nonrecurring items (charges and gains) included in the subject product financial results.--For
each annual period for which financial results are reported in question III-9a, please specify all
material (significant) nonrecurring items (charges and gains) in the schedule below, the specific
question III-9a line item where the nonrecurring items are included, a brief description of the
relevant nonrecurring items, and the associated values (in $1,000), as reflected in question III9a; i.e., if an aggregate nonrecurring item has been allocated to question III-9a, only the
allocated value amount included in question III-9a should be reported in the schedule below.
Note: The Commission’s objective here is to gather information only on material (significant)
nonrecurring items which impacted the reported financial results of the subject product in
question III-9a.
Calendar years
2015
2016
2017
Nonrecurring item: In this column please provide a brief
Nonrecurring item: In these columns please report the amount of the relevant
description of each nonrecurring item and indicate the
nonrecurring item reported in question III-9a.
specific line item in table III-9a where the nonrecurring item is
classified.
Value ($1,000)
1.
, classified as
2.
, classified as
3.
, classified as
4.
, classified as
5.
, classified as
6.
, classified as
7.
, classified as
III-11. Classification of identified nonrecurring items (charges and gains) in the accounting books and
records of the company.--If non-recurring items were reported in question III-10 above, please
identify where your company recorded these items in your accounting books and records in the
normal course of business; i.e., just as responses to question III-10 identify where these items
are reported in question III-9a.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 23
III-12. Asset values.--Report the total assets (i.e., both current and long-term assets) associated with
the production, warehousing, and sale of low melt PSF. If your firm does not maintain some or
all of the specific asset information necessary to calculate total assets for low melt PSF in the
normal course of business, please estimate this information based upon a method (such as
production, sales, or costs) that is consistent with relevant cost allocations in question III-9a.
Provide data for calendar years 2015-17.
Note: Total assets should reflect net assets after any accumulated depreciation and allowances
deducted.
Total assets should be allocated to the subject products if these assets are also related to other
products. Please provide a brief explanation if there are any substantial changes in total asset
value during the period; e.g., due to asset write-offs, revaluation, and major purchases.
Value (in $1,000)
Calendar years
Item
Total assets (net)
1
2015
2016
2017
1
Describe
III-13. Capital expenditures and research and development expenses.--Report your firm’s capital
expenditures and research and development expenses for low melt PSF. Provide data for
calendar years 2015-17.
Value (in $1,000)
Calendar years
Item
2015
2016
2017
1
Capital expenditures
Research and development expenses2
1
2
Please describe the nature, focus, and significance of your firm’s capital expenditures on low melt PSF.
Please describe the nature, focus, and significance of your firm’s R&D expenses related to low melt PSF.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 24
III-14. Data consistency and reconciliation.--Please indicate whether your firm’s financial data for
questions III-9a, 12, and 13 are based on calendar years:
Yes
No
Please note the quantities and values reported in question III-9a should reconcile with the data
reported in question II-6 (including export shipments) as long as they are reported on the same
calendar year basis.
RECONCILIATION OF TRADE VS FINANCIAL DATA.--Please ensure that the quantities and values reported
for total shipments in part II equal the quantities and values reported for total net sales in part III of this
questionnaire in each time period. If the calculated fields below return values other than zero (i.e., “0”)
and both are being reported on a calendar basis, please explain the discrepancy below.
Full year data
Reconciliation
2015
2016
2017
Quantity: Trade data from question
II-7 (lines D, F, H, and J) less financial
total net sales quantity data from
question III-9a, = zero ("0").
0
0
0
Value: Trade data from question II-7
(lines E, G, I, and K) less financial
total net sales value data from
question III-9a, = zero ("0").
0
0
0
Do these data in question III-9a reconcile with data in question II-7?
Yes
No
If no, please explain.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 25
If your responses to any of the items in questions III-15, III-16, and III-17 differ by country, please
describe these differences and, as applicable, indicate which country or countries your response refers
to in the relevant form fields.
III-15. Effects of imports on investment.--Since January 1, 2015, has your firm experienced any actual
negative effects on its return on investment or the scale of capital investments as a result of
imports of low melt PSF from Korea and/or Taiwan?
No
Yes--My firm has experienced actual negative effects as follows:
(check as many as appropriate)
Cancellation, postponement,
or rejection of expansion
projects
Denial or rejection of
investment proposal
Reduction in the size of
capital investments
Return on specific
investments negatively
impacted
Other
(please describe)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 26
III-16. Effects of imports on growth and development.--Since January 1, 2015, has your firm
experienced any actual negative effects on its growth, ability to raise capital, or existing
development and production efforts (including efforts to develop a derivative or more advanced
version of the product) as a result of imports of low melt PSF from Korea and/or Taiwan?
No
Yes--My firm has experienced actual negative effects as follows:
(check as many as appropriate)
(please describe)
Rejection of bank loans
Lowering of credit rating
Problem related to the issue
of stocks or bonds
Ability to service debt
Other
III-17. Anticipated effects of imports.--Does your firm anticipate any negative effects due to imports of
low melt PSF from Korea and/or Taiwan?
No
Yes
If yes, my firm anticipates negative effects as follows:
III-18. Other explanations.--If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part III
that did not provide a narrative box, please note the question number and the explanation in
the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your firm had in
providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with the MS Word
questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 27
PART IV.--PRICING AND MARKET FACTORS
Further information on this part of the questionnaire can be obtained from John Benedetto (202-2053270, [email protected]).
IV-1.
Contact information.--Please identify the responsible individual and the manner by which
Commission staff may contact that individual regarding the confidential information submitted
in part IV.
Name
Title
Email
Telephone
PRICE DATA
IV-2.
This question requests quarterly quantity and value data for your firm’s commercial shipments
to unrelated U.S. customers since January 1, 2015 of the following products produced by your
firm.
As indicated below, please separate sales to distributors from sales to end users.
Product 1.--Low melt polyester staple fiber, white, non-crystalline, 4 denier in diameter, 37-76
mm in cut length, sheath melt point of 110°C.
Product 2.--Low melt polyester staple fiber, white, non-crystalline, 4 denier in diameter, 37-76
mm in cut length, sheath melt point of 180°C.
Product 3.--Low melt polyester staple fiber, white, non-crystalline, 2 denier in diameter, 37-76
mm in cut length, melt point of 110°C.
Product 4.--Low melt polyester staple fiber, dyed/solution dyed/colored, color match and
controlled (+/- 1.0 Delta E), non-crystalline, 4 denier in diameter, 37-76 mm in cut
length, melt point of 110°C.
Please note that values should be f.o.b., U.S. point of shipment and should not include U.S.-inland
transportation costs. Values should reflect the final net amount paid to your firm (i.e., should be net
of all deductions for discounts or rebates).
During January 2015-December 2017, did your firm produce and sell to unrelated U.S.
customers any of the above listed products (or any products that were competitive with these
products)?
Yes.--Please complete the following pricing data table(s) as appropriate.
No.--Skip to question IV-3.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 28
IV-2(b). Price data.--Report below the quarterly price data1 for pricing products2 produced and sold by
your firm to distributors.
SALES TO DISTRIBUTORS
Report data in actual pounds (not 1,000s) and actual dollars (not 1,000s).
Product 1
Quantity
Value
(Quantity in pounds, value in dollars)
Product 2
Product 3
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Product 4
Quantity
Value
Period of shipment
2015:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
2016:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
2017:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
1
Net values (i.e., gross sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned goods), f.o.b.
your firm’s U.S. point of shipment.
2
Pricing product definitions are provided on the first page of Part IV.
Note.--If your firm’s product does not exactly meet the product specifications but is competitive with the specified product, provide a
description of your firm’s product. Also, please explain any anomalies in your firm’s reported pricing data.
Product 1:
Product 2:
Product 3:
Product 4:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 29
IV-2(b). Price data.--Continued. Report below the quarterly price data1 for pricing products2 produced
and sold by your firm to end users.
SALES TO END USERS
Report data in actual pounds (not 1,000s) and actual dollars (not 1,000s).
Product 1
Quantity
Value
(Quantity in pounds, value in dollars)
Product 2
Product 3
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Product 4
Quantity
Value
Period of shipment
2015:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
2016:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
2017:
January-March
April-June
July-September
OctoberDecember
1
Net values (i.e., gross sales values less all discounts, allowances, rebates, prepaid freight, and the value of returned goods), f.o.b.
your firm’s U.S. point of shipment.
2
Pricing product definitions are provided on the first page of Part IV.
Note.--If your firm’s product does not exactly meet the product specifications but is competitive with the specified product, provide a
description of your firm’s product. Also, please explain any anomalies in your firm’s reported pricing data.
Product 1:
Product 2:
Product 3:
Product 4:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 30
IV-2 (c). Price data checklist.--Please check that the pricing data in question IV-2(b) has been correctly
reported.
Is the price data reported above:
√ if Yes
In actual dollars (not $1,000)?
In actual pounds (not 1,000s)?
F.o.b. U.S. point of shipment (i.e., does not include U.S. transport costs)?
Net of all discounts and rebates?
Have returns credited to the quarter in which the sale occurred?
Less than reported commercial shipments in question II-7 in each year?
IV-2 (d). Pricing data methodology.--Please describe the method and the kinds of documents/records
that were used to compile your price data.
Note:
As requested in Part I of this questionnaire, please keep all supporting documents/records used
in the preparation of the price data, as Commission staff may contact your firm regarding
questions on the price data. The Commission may also request that your company submit copies
of the supporting documents/records (such as sales journal, invoices, etc.) used to compile these
data.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
IV-3.
Price setting.--How does your firm determine the prices that it charges for sales of low melt PSF
(check all that apply)? If your firm issues price lists, please submit sample pages of a recent list.
Transaction
by
transaction
IV-4.
Contracts
Set
price
lists
Other
If other, describe
Discount policy.--Please indicate and describe your firm’s discount policies (check all that apply).
Quantity
discounts
IV-5.
Page 31
Annual
total
volume
discounts
No
discount
policy
Other
Describe
Pricing terms.-(a)
What are your firm’s typical sales terms for its U.S.-produced low melt PSF?
Net 30
days
(b)
Net 60
days
2/10 net
30 days
Other
Other (specify)
On what basis are your firm’s prices of domestic low melt PSF usually quoted (check
one)?
Delivered
F.o.b.
If f.o.b., specify point
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
IV-6.
Contract versus spot.-- Approximately what share of your firm’s sales of its U.S.-produced low
melt PSF in 2017 was on a (1) long-term contract basis, (2) annual contract basis, (3) short-term
contract basis, and (4) spot sales basis?
Item
Share of 2017
sales
IV-7.
Page 32
Long-term
contracts
(multiple
deliveries for
more than 12
months)
%
Type of sale
Short-term
Annual
contracts
contracts
(multiple
(multiple
deliveries for
deliveries for 12
less than 12
months)
months)
%
Total
(should
sum to
100.0%)
Spot sales
(for a single
delivery)
%
%
0.0 %
Contract provisions.--Please fill out the table regarding your firm’s typical sales contracts for
U.S.-produced low melt PSF (or check “not applicable” if your firm does not sell on a long-term,
short-term and/or annual contract basis).
Typical sales
contract provisions
Item
Average contract
duration
No. of
days
Price renegotiation
(during contract
period)
Yes
Fixed quantity
and/or price
Meet or release
provision
Not applicable
No
Quantity
Price
Both
Yes
No
Short-term contracts
(multiple deliveries
for less than 12
months)
Annual contracts
(multiple
deliveries for 12
months)
365
Long-term contracts
(multiple deliveries for
more than 12 months)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
IV-8.
Page 33
Lead times.--What is your firm’s share of sales from inventory vs. produced to order and what is
the typical lead time between a customer’s order and the date of delivery for your firm’s sales of
its U.S.-produced low melt PSF?
Source
Share of 2017
sales
From inventory
%
Produced to order
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
IV-9.
Lead time (Average
number of days)
0.0 %
Shipping information.-(a)
What is the approximate percentage of the cost of U.S.-produced low melt PSF that is
accounted for by U.S. inland transportation costs?
%
(b)
Who generally arranges the transportation of low melt PSF to your firm’s customers’
locations?
Your firm
Purchaser (check one)
(c)
Indicate the approximate percentage of your firm’s sales of low melt PSF that are
delivered the following distances from your firm’s production facility.
Distance from production facility
Share
Within 100 miles
%
101 to 1,000 miles
%
Over 1,000 miles
%
Total (should sum to 100.0%)
0.0
%
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 34
IV-10. Geographical shipments.--In which U.S. geographic market area(s) has your firm sold its U.S.produced low melt PSF since January 1, 2015 (check all that apply)?
Geographic area
√ if applicable
Northeast.–CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT.
Midwest.–IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, and WI.
Southeast.–AL, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, MD, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, and WV.
Central Southwest.–AR, LA, OK, and TX.
Mountains.–AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, UT, and WY.
Pacific Coast.–CA, OR, and WA.
Other.–All other markets in the United States not previously listed,
including AK, HI, PR, and VI.
IV-11. End uses.--List the end uses of the low melt PSF that your firm manufactures. For each end-use
product, what percentage of the total cost is accounted for by low melt PSF and other inputs?
Share of total cost of end use product
accounted for by
End use product
Low melt PSF
Other inputs
Total
(should sum to
100.0% across)
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
%
%
0.0 %
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 35
IV-12. Substitutes.--Can other products be substituted for low melt PSF?
No
Yes--Please fill out the table.
End use in which this
substitute is used
Substitute
Have changes in the price of this substitute
affected the price for low melt PSF?
No Yes
Explanation
1.
2.
3.
IV-13. Demand trends.--Indicate how demand within the United States and outside of the United
States (if known) for low melt PSF has changed since January 1, 2015. Explain any trends and
describe the principal factors that have affected these changes in demand.
Overall
increase
Market
No
Overall
change decrease
Fluctuate
with no
clear trend
Explanation and factors
Within the United States
Outside the United States
IV-14. Product changes.--Have there been any significant changes in the product range, product mix,
or marketing of low melt PSF since January 1, 2015?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe and quantify if possible.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 36
IV-15. Conditions of competition.-(a)
Is the low melt PSF market subject to business cycles (other than general economy-wide
conditions) and/or other conditions of competition distinctive to low melt PSF? If yes,
describe.
Check all that apply.
Please describe.
No
Skip to question IV-16.
Yes-Business cycles (e.g.
seasonal business)
Yes-Other distinctive
conditions of competition
(b)
If yes, have there been any changes in the business cycles or conditions of competition
for low melt PSF since January 1, 2015?
No
Yes
If yes, describe.
IV-16. Supply constraints.--Has your firm refused, declined, or been unable to supply low melt PSF
since January 1, 2015 (examples include placing customers on allocation or “controlled order
entry,” declining to accept new customers or renew existing customers, delivering less than the
quantity promised, been unable to meet timely shipment commitments, etc.)?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 37
IV-17. Raw materials.—
(a) How have low melt PSF raw material prices changed since January 1, 2015?
Fluctuate
Overall
No
Overall
with no
increase change decrease clear trend
Explain, noting how raw material price changes
have affected your firm’s selling prices for low
melt PSF.
(b) Are your firm’s sales prices of low melt PSF based directly on published prices of any raw
materials?
No
Yes
If yes, please describe.
IV-18. Interchangeability.--Is low melt PSF produced in the United States and in other countries
interchangeable (i.e., can they physically be used in the same applications)?
“Korea Subject” – Purchases from all Korean producers except Huvis Corporation.
“Korea Nonsubject” – Purchases from Korean producer Huvis Corporation.
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = the products from a specified country-pair are always interchangeable
F = the products are frequently interchangeable
S = the products are sometimes interchangeable
N = the products are never interchangeable
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country-pair
Country-pair
Korea subject
Taiwan
Korea nonsubject
Other countries
United States
Korea subject
Taiwan
Korea nonsubject
For any country-pair producing low melt PSF that is sometimes or never interchangeable, identify the
country-pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 38
IV-19. Factors other than price.--Are differences other than price (e.g., quality, availability,
transportation network, product range, technical support, etc.) between low melt PSF produced
in the United States and in other countries a significant factor in your firm’s sales of the
products?
“Korea Subject” – Purchases from all Korean producers except Huvis Corporation.
“Korea Nonsubject” – Purchases from Korean producer Huvis Corporation.
Please indicate A, F, S, N, or 0 in the table below:
A = such differences are always significant
F = such differences are frequently significant
S = such differences are sometimes significant
N = such differences are never significant
0 = no familiarity with products from a specified country-pair
Country-pair
Korea subject
Taiwan
Korea nonsubject
Other countries
United States
Korea subject
Taiwan
Korea nonsubject
For any country-pair producing low melt PSF that is sometimes or never interchangeable, identify the
country-pair and explain the factors that limit or preclude interchangeable use:
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 39
IV-20. Customer identification.--List the names and contact information for your firm’s 10 largest U.S.
customers for low melt PSF since January 1, 2015. Indicate the share of the quantity of your
firm’s total shipments of low melt PSF that each of these customers accounted for in 2017.
Customer’s name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
City
State
Share of 2017 sales (%)
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 40
IV-21. Competition from imports
(a)
Lost revenue.--Since January 1, 2015: To avoid losing sales to competitors selling low
melt PSF from Korea and/or Taiwan, did your firm:
Item
No
Yes
Reduce prices
Roll back announced price increases
(b)
Lost sales.--Since January 1, 2015: Did your firm lose sales of low melt PSF to imports of
this product from Korea and/or Taiwan?
No
Yes
IV-22. Other explanations.--If your firm would like to further explain a response to a question in Part
IV that did not provide a narrative response box, please note the question number and the
explanation in the space provided below. Please also use this space to highlight any issues your
firm had in providing the data in this section, including but not limited to technical issues with
the MS Word questionnaire.
Business Proprietary
U.S. Producers’ Questionnaire – Low melt PSF (F)
Page 41
HOW TO FILE YOUR QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE
This questionnaire is available as a “fillable” form in MS Word format on the
Commission’s website at:
https://usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2018/low_melt_polyester_staple_fiber_korea_
and_taiwan/final.htm
Please do not attempt to modify the format or permissions of the questionnaire
document. Please submit the completed questionnaire using one of the methods noted
below. If your firm is unable to complete the MS Word questionnaire or cannot use one
of the electronic methods of submission, please contact the Commission for further
instructions.
• Upload via Secure Drop Box.—Upload the MS Word questionnaire along with a scanned copy of the
signed certification page (page 1) through the Commission’s secure upload facility:
Web address: https://dropbox.usitc.gov/oinv/
Pin: LMPSF
• E-mail.—E-mail the MS Word questionnaire to [email protected]; include a scanned
copy of the signed certification page (page 1). Submitters are strongly encouraged to encrypt nonpublic
documents that are electronically transmitted to the Commission to protect your sensitive information
from unauthorized disclosure. The USITC secure drop-box system and the Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS) use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 cryptographic
algorithms to encrypt data in transit. Submitting your nonpublic documents by a means that does not
use these encryption algorithms (such as by email) may subject your firm’s nonpublic information to
unauthorized disclosure during transmission. If you choose a non-encrypted method of electronic
transmission, the Commission warns you that the risk of such possible unauthorized disclosure is
assumed by you and not by the Commission.
If your firm does not produce this product, please fill out page 1, print, sign, and submit a scanned copy
to the Commission.
Parties to this proceeding.—If your firm is a party to this proceeding, it is required to serve a copy of the
completed questionnaire on parties to the proceeding that are subject to administrative protective
order (see 19 CFR § 207.7). A list of such parties may be obtained from the Commission’s Secretary (202205-1803). A certificate of service must accompany the completed questionnaire you submit (see 19 CFR
§ 207.7). Service of the questionnaire must be made in paper form.
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | USITCQUESTIONNAIRE |
Author | Stiger, Porscha |
File Modified | 2018-02-13 |
File Created | 2018-02-13 |