OMB approves 3
months of an extension request while FERC works to reinstates this
collection for the full 3 years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
02/29/2020
12/31/2019
510
0
0
2,296
0
0
0
0
0
As stated by NERC in its Petition
(dated 3/14/2016 [footnotes omitted]) in Docket No. RD16-4, “[t]he
purpose of proposed Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 is to require
entities to manage vegetation located on transmission rights of way
(ROW) and minimize encroachments from vegetation located adjacent
to the ROW to reduce the risk of vegetation-related outages that
could lead to Cascading. Proposed Reliability Standard FAC-003-4
reflects revisions developed under Project 2010-07.1 Vegetation
Management to provide a revised gap factor applied in the Gallet
equation supporting the appropriate Alternating Current Minimum
Vegetation Clearance Distances (referred to herein as “MVCD
values”) stated under the Reliability Standard. The MVCD value
reflects the minimum distance between vegetation and conductors to
prevent a flash-over. This revised gap factor was developed as a
result of the 2015 Technical Report prepared by EPRI entitled
Supplemental Testing to Confirm or Refine Gap Factor Utilized in
Calculation of Minimum Vegetation Clearance Distances (“MVCD”):
Tests: Results and Analysis (“EPRI Report”) filed at the Commission
in Docket No. RM12-4-000 in compliance with the Commission’s
directive in Order No. 777. The EPRI Report, the preliminary report
preceding it, and EPRI’s recent update to the EPRI Report filed in
Docket No. RM12-4-000 are attached at Exhibit E. As reflected in
this Petition and the attached exhibits, the EPRI test results
indicated that MVCD values under currently effective Reliability
Standard FAC-003-3 might not be suitable or sufficiently
conservative in all situations. The EPRI testing revealed that the
gap factor used to determine those MVCD values under the Gallet
equation was too high for all situations with varying tree and
conductor configurations. The gap factor is a multiplier that
adjusts MVCD values for different configurations of vegetation and
conductors to avoid flashover (a lower gap factor correlates to
higher MVCD values). The EPRI tests thus led to the conclusion that
MVCD values under existing Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 appeared
low. The EPRI test results demonstrated the Gallet equation should
apply a more conservative, lower, gap factor of 1.0 to calculate
MVCD values for Reliability Standard FAC-003-4. Proposed
Reliability Standard FAC-003-4, therefore proposes higher and more
conservative MVCD values. These higher MVCD values will enhance
reliability and provide additional confidence by applying a more
conservative approach to determining the vegetation clearing
distances.” In the Delegated Order (dated 4/26/2016) in Docket No.
RD16-4, FERC approved the revised Reliability Standard proposed by
NERC.
See the letter from
FERC's General Counsel to OMB requesting reinstatement and an
emergency extension of FERC-725M. The letter (dated 10/7/2019) is
attached under 'Supplementary Documents.' FERC requests a 3-month
Emergency Extension (to 12/31/2019, from 9/30/2019) of FERC-725M.
The 60-day notice for FERC-725M was published in the Federal
Register on 8/27/2019, 84 FR 44890, with a public comment period
ending 10/28/2019. (It is included under Supplementary Documents.)
The FERC-725M reporting and recordkeeping requirements are
generally not submitted to the Commission but are prepared and
retained for use by the compliance enforcement authority (NERC [the
nation’s FERC-approved Electric Reliability Organization] or the
Regional Entity). If that FERC-725M information were not required
and available, it could jeopardize the reliability of the nation’s
Bulk Power System and lead to additional sustained power outages.
The Commission requires the information in the FERC-725M to
implement statutory provisions of section 215 of the Federal Power
Act (FPA). On 8/8/2005, Congress enacted the Electricity
Modernization Act of 2005, which is Title XII, Subtitle A, of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). EPAct 2005 added a new
section 215 to the FPA, which requires a Commission-certified
Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and
enforceable Reliability Standards, which are subject to Commission
review and approval. Once approved, the Reliability Standards may
be enforced by the ERO subject to Commission oversight, or the
Commission can independently enforce Reliability Standards.
Reliability Standards developed by the ERO and approved by the
Commission apply to users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power
System as set forth in each Reliability Standard. FERC-725M
includes Reliability Standard FAC-003-4 (Transmission Vegetation
Management). Purpose of FAC-003-4: “To maintain a reliable electric
transmission system by using a defense- in-depth strategy to manage
vegetation located on transmission rights of way (ROW) and minimize
encroachments from vegetation located adjacent to the ROW, thus
preventing the risk of those vegetation- related outages that could
lead to Cascading.” Need for FAC-003-4 Data, and Risk without Data:
Vegetation contact with transmission lines was a major factor in
two significant blackouts (WECC territory in 1996, and the August
2003 Northeast blackout). The documentation requirements related to
vegetation management requirements assists respondents to manage
vegetation located on rights-of-way and minimize vegetation
encroachments. The documentation further provides a way for
auditors to evaluate compliance with this standard. Failure to
impose the requirements could jeopardize system reliability and
lead to outages in the Bulk Power System.
US Code:
16
USC 824o Name of Law: Energy Policy Act of 2005
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.