The Crash Report Sampling System
(CRSS) collects data from police-reported crashes involving all
types of motor vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists; this includes
property damage only crashes as well as those resulting in injuries
and fatalities. CRSS obtains its data from a nationally
representative probability sample selected from the estimated six
million police-reported crashes that occur annually in the United
States. By focusing attention on police-reported crashes, CRSS
concentrates on the crashes of greatest concern to the highway
safety community and the general public. CRSS depends on the
voluntary participation and cooperation of State and law
enforcement agencies. This allows the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) and its contractors to access the
crash reports to review, list, and categorize the crashes. The
crash reports provide essential data: detailed information
regarding the location of the crash, the vehicles, and the people
involved. The reports are official local and State government forms
that include the location of the crash and the pre-crash
environment, explains the number and types of vehicles involved as
well as describing the persons, injuries and other variables to
express how the person was involved in the crash. No personally
identifiable information is collected or released via the CRSS
program. Selected crashes are released to the public in the annual
CRSS file following quality control processes conducted by NHTSA.
These data files are used by NHTSA and the general public for
highway safety research purposes.
The total burden hour estimate
of 35,680 hours represents an increase of 28,400 hours over the
previously estimated burden of 7,280 hours. The change in burden
hours represents a recalculation designed to more accurately
estimate the time required to comply with the collection. The
previous calculation was estimated prior to CRSS’s implementation
and didn’t take into account the burden of establishing and
maintaining cooperation with police jurisdictions and State
agencies, to access crash report data. Additional administrative
processes and more formalized arrangements which are in place to
protect personal identifiable information have been encountered
while establishing CRSS. Additionally, the CRSS data collection
efforts involves a variety of methods to access crash reports, both
manual and electronic processes which were unknown at the prior
submission. While CRSS leverages new technology to reduce the
burden on respondents wherever possible, initial CRSS burden
estimates were calculated based on assumptions rooted in the legacy
National Automotive Sampling System General Estimates System (NASS
GES) that CRSS has since replaced. With increasing concerns related
to liability and privacy protection, police jurisdictions have in
many cases implemented stringent and time-consuming oversight
requirements related to accessing crash reports. These additional
needs include but are not limited to requiring respondent
representatives be present while the CRSS sampler is reviewing the
crash reports during collection site visits. Administrative burdens
such as making paper copies of crash reports and/or uploading
electronic crash reports for the CRSS sampler to access when the
police jurisdiction is not able to provide a physical work space is
also included in the burden estimate. Additionally, the process of
establishing cooperation is taking more time than it did under NASS
GES with police jurisdictions taking more time to verify the
purpose and intent of the program and frequently seeking approval
from police chiefs and local legal counsel before providing access.
Respondent jurisdictions are now frequently reviewing the CRSS
contractor’s statement of work, consulting legal counsel, and
requiring specific memoranda of understanding with NHTSA prior to
agreeing to participate in the program. These additional activities
germane to establishing cooperation and managing manual data
collection activities were not anticipated when the original CRSS
burden estimate was developed.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.