Download:
pdf |
pdf2018-2021
Public Transportation
Transit Asset Management Plan
Tier I Plan in accordance with 49 CFR §625.5
September 2018
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
Message from the Commissioner
It is my pleasure, as Commissioner of the Connecticut
Department of Transportation (CTDOT), to present the State’s
initial Public Transportation Transit Asset Management Plan
(TAMP). This plan goes beyond federal mandates and
demonstrates a strong commitment to achieving a State of
Good Repair for our transportation system. Connecticut’s
transportation system is multimodal and supports the economy
by enabling the efficient movement of people, goods, and
services. Connecticut is a vital transportation link between
northern New England and New York, New Jersey and the MidAtlantic states. The transportation system also links our
communities; helping connect neighborhoods, towns, and
cities. In order for Connecticut’s economy to function properly
and grow, the transportation system must be maintained and
updated.
This document presents a plan developed in partnership with
CTDOT Public Transportations’ statewide service providers, to
achieve a systematic and comprehensive asset management
system for the State’s public transportation assets to provide
safe and reliable service for the citizens of Connecticut.
Implementation of this plan will align with the Department’s
priority to maintain and preserve the transportation system.
James P. Redeker
Commissioner
CTDOT PT-TAMP
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
Disclaimer
The Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) has prepared this Transit Asset
Management Plan (TAMP) in accordance with 49 CFR 625.5 and pursuant to the further guidance
and direction of the Federal Transit Administration. The TAMP presented here is our plan to
ultimately achieve a systematic and comprehensive asset management system for Connecticut’s
public transportation assets.
New federal regulations for tracking and reporting system performance for transit assets will
require changes to our current practices by Connecticut's service providers. In some cases asset
condition reported herein are based on professional judgement in the absence of technical data.
CTDOT has developed a documented approach for future data collection consistent with FTA
guidance which will be reflected in the next TAMP update.
CTDOT will initiate in-depth inspections of its public transportation assets and will further update
the TAMP periodically. Future TAMP updates will revise investment recommendations as the asset
condition data requires.
For further information or questions about this document, please contact Sharon Okoye at 860594-2367 or [email protected].
Connecticut Department of Transportation
CTDOT PT-TAMP
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
Connecticut Department of Transportation
Public Transportation Transit Asset Management Plan
Table of Contents
Approval Letter ................................................................................................
Message from the Commissioner....................................................................
Table of Contents .............................................................................................
List of Acronyms ...............................................................................................
Chapter 1. Introduction ..............................................................................1-1
Chapter 2. Goals and Objectives ................................................................2-1
Chapter 3. Inventory and Condition ...........................................................3-1
Chapter 4. Analytical Approach ..................................................................4-1
Chapter 5. Investment Scenarios................................................................5-1
Chapter 6. Investment Plan ........................................................................6-1
Chapter 7. Implementation and Monitoring..............................................7-1
Appendices
Appendix A. Asset Fact Sheets .................................................................. A-1
Appendix B. Condition Assessment Guidance .......................................... B-1
Appendix C. Maintenance Responsibility Matrix...................................... C-1
Appendix D. Target Setting Facilities Checklist ......................................... D-1
Appendix E. Slow Zone Calculations...........................................................E-1
Appendix F. TAPT Results ........................................................................... F-1
Appendix G. Five Year Capital Plan (FY2017-2021)................................... G-1
Appendix H. Equipment Over $50,000 ...................................................... H-1
DISCLAIMER: The data presented here is for informational purposes only. It is not to be used in any legal manner
or proceedings. CTDOT makes every effort to ensure the data is as accurate and current as possible.
Neither the State of Connecticut, nor the Connecticut Department of Transportation, nor any of its employees,
shall be held liable or responsible for any errors or omissions in data.
The U.S. Government and the Connecticut Department of Transportation do not endorse products or
manufacturers.
CTDOT PT-TAMP
PT-TAMP Table of Figures
Figure 1-1. CTDOT TAM Organizational Structure...................................................................................... 1-8
Figure 1-2. Bureau of Public Transportation TAM Organizational Structure ............................................. 1-9
Figure 1-3. CTDOT PT-TAMP Inventory Summary .................................................................................... 1-10
Figure 3-1. Transportation Assets in Connecticut ...................................................................................... 3-3
Figure 3-2. PT-TAMP Asset Hierarchy......................................................................................................... 3-4
Figure 3-3. Bus Service in Connecticut ....................................................................................................... 3-5
Figure 3-4. Passenger Rail Service in Connecticut ...................................................................................... 3-6
Figure 3-5. Data Resources for SGR Inventory ........................................................................................... 3-9
Figure 4-1. SGR Transit Database Schema................................................................................................. 4-3
Figure 4-2. TAPT User Interface Organization ........................................................................................... 4-5
Figure 4-3. TAPT Start Screen ..................................................................................................................... 4-6
Figure 4-4. TAPT Model Example ............................................................................................................... 4-7
Figure 4-5. CTDOT TAPT Start Screen ....................................................................................................... 4-10
Figure 4-6. CTDOT TAPT Vehicle Inventory .............................................................................................. 4-11
Figure 5-1. Estimated Investment Needs by Asset Category in 2018 (Bus Mode) ..................................... 5-6
Figure 5-2. Estimated Investment Needs by Asset Category in 2018 (Rail Mode) ..................................... 5-7
Figure 5-3. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 1 (Bus Mode) .......................................... 5-10
Figure 5-4. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 2 (Bus Mode) .......................................... 5-11
Figure 5-5. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 3 (Bus Mode) .......................................... 5-11
Figure 5-6. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 1 (Rail Mode) .......................................... 5-12
Figure 5-7. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 2 (Rail Mode) .......................................... 5-13
Figure 5-8. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 3 (Rail Mode) .......................................... 5-13
Figure 6-1. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 1 (Bus Mode) ........................................... 6-6
Figure 6-2. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 2 (Bus Mode) ........................................... 6-6
Figure 6-3. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 3 (Bus Mode) ........................................... 6-7
Figure 6-4. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 1 (Rail Mode) ........................................... 6-8
Figure 6-5. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 2 (Rail Mode) .......................................... 6-8
Figure 6-6. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 3 (Rail Mode) ........................................... 6-9
Figure 6-7. Predicted Performance for Bus Rolling Stock......................................................................... 6-10
Figure 6-8. Predicted Performance for Rail Rolling Stock ........................................................................ 6-11
Figure 6-9. Predicted Performance for Equipment .................................................................................. 6-12
Figure 6-10. Predicted Performance for Facilities .................................................................................... 6-13
CTDOT PT TAMP
PT-TAMP Table of Tables
Table 3-1. ULB Values for Bus Rolling Stock ............................................................................................. 3-13
Table 3-2. CTDOT Bus Inventory and Condition ....................................................................................... 3-14
Table 3-3. ULB Values for Rail Rolling Stock ............................................................................................. 3-15
Table 3-4. CTDOT Rail Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition ................................................................. 3-16
Table 3-5. ULB Values for Ferryboat Rolling Stock ................................................................................... 3-17
Table 3-6. CTDOT Rail Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition ................................................................. 3-17
Table 3-7. ULB Custom Values for Equipment ......................................................................................... 3-19
Table 3-8. CTDOT Equipment Inventory and Condition ........................................................................... 3-20
Table 3-9. Conversion Scale: Rail Infrastructure Asset Age
to FTA TERM Condition Rating ................................................................................................................. 3-22
Table 3-10. ULB Values for Track elements .............................................................................................. 3-22
Table 3-11. ULB Values for Power ........................................................................................................... 3-24
Table 3-12. CTDOT Track Inventory and Condition .................................................................................. 3-25
Table 3-13. CTDOT Power Inventory and Condition................................................................................. 3-26
Table 3-14. CTDOT Structures Inventory and Condition .......................................................................... 3-26
Table 3-15. CTDOT Signals Inventory and Condition ................................................................................ 3-26
Table 3-16. Pavement Condition Index Metrics ....................................................................................... 3-27
Table 3-17. CTDOT Bus Guideway Inventory and Condition .................................................................... 3-29
Table 3-18. FTA TERM Condition Assessment Scale................................................................................. 3-31
Table 3-19. Administrative/Maintenance Facility Components............................................................... 3-32
Table 3-20. Conversion Scale: Asset Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating ................................................ 3-32
Table 3-21. Fire Protection and Conveyance Condition Assessment Scale.............................................. 3-33
Table 3-22. CTDOT Administrative/Maintenance Facility Inventory and Condition ................................ 3-33
Table 3-23. Passenger Facility Components ............................................................................................. 3-35
Table 3-24. Conversion Scale: NBI to TERM ............................................................................................. 3-36
Table 3-25. CTDOT Passenger Facility Inventory and Condition .............................................................. 3-37
Table 3-26. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Rolling Stock ................................................... 3-39
Table 3-27. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Equipment ...................................................... 3-40
Table 3-28. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Infrastructure ................................................. 3-40
Table 3-29. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Facilities .......................................................... 3-40
Table 5-1. Summary of Estimated Funding for Transit ............................................................................... 5-3
Table 5-2. Summary of Estimated Connecticut Share of FTA Programs .................................................... 5-4
Table 5-3. Summary of Estimated Funding Uses for Transit ..................................................................... 5-5
Table 5-4. Percent of Total Funds Used for Modeled SGR Activities, by Source........................................ 5-8
Table 5-5. Percent of Total Funds Used for Modeled SGR Activities ......................................................... 5-8
Table 5-6. Total Funds by Scenario............................................................................................................. 5-9
Table 5-7. SGR Funds by Scenario .............................................................................................................. 5-9
CTDOT PT-TAMP
List of Acronyms
AIM
Asset Inventory Module
ARAN
Automatic Road Analyzer
ARSA
Amended and Restated Service Agreement
BMS
Bridge Management System
CPI
Consumer Price Index
CSS
Context-Sensitive Solutions
CTC
Centralized Traffic Control
CTDOT
Connecticut Department of Transportation
EMU
Electric Multiple Units
FAST
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
FHWA
Federal Highway Administration
FMS
Facilities Management Solution
FTA
Federal Transit Administration
Group-TAMP
Transit Asset Management Group Plan
HL
Hartford Line
IRI
International Roughness Index
ITS
Intelligent Transportation Systems
LRTP
Long Range Transportation Plan
LCP
Life Cycle Planning
MAP-21
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MCI
Motor Coach Industries
MDBF
Mean Distance Between Failures
MNR
Metro North Railroad
MOW
Maintenance of Way
MPO
Metropolitan Planning Organization
CTDOT PT-TAMP
MTA
Metropolitan Transit Authority
NBI
National Bridge Inventory
NBT
New Britain Transportation Company
NEC
Northeast Corridor
NHL
New Haven Line
NTD
National Transit Database
PT-TAMP
Public Transportation Transit Asset Management Plan
OCS
Overhead Contact System
PCI
Pavement Condition Index
PI
Prioritization Index
PTC
Positive Train Control
RBIM
Railroad Bridge Inspection Manual
RBMP
Railroad Bridge Management Program
ROW
Right-of-Way
SLE
Shore Line East
SGR
State of Good Repair
SQL
Structured Query Language
STIP
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
TAM
Transit Asset Management
TAPT
Transit Asset Prioritization Tool
TCRP
Transit Cooperative Research Program
TERM
Transit Economic Requirements Model
TYNA
Twenty Year Needs Assessment
ULB
Useful Life Benchmark
CTDOT PT-TAMP
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
The Connecticut Department of Transportation has
created this Transit Asset Management Plan to
document the agency’s asset management processes
and policies, summarize the inventory and condition
of transit assets, prioritize State of Good Repair
investments, and construct a blueprint for
transportation asset management improvements
moving forward. This document is also designed to
meet Federal Transit Administration’s transit asset
management requirements. This document builds on
past practices and accomplishments in maintaining
Connecticut’s transportation infrastructure while also
emphasizing the importance of implementing a plan
to maintain our infrastructure today and in the future.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Welcome
Transit asset management (TAM) is a strategic and systematic process of
taking care of assets, with a focus on both engineering and economics and
is based upon collection of quality data. The TAM process identifies a
structured sequence of work to better maintain transit capital assets in a
State of Good Repair (SGR) over their lifecycle at a minimum cost.
In Connecticut, the practices of asset management are needed to address
the condition of our infrastructure as many of our assets have aged beyond
their intended life expectancy. This aging infrastructure combined with
increased demands on the transportation network and limited funding
strongly substantiates the need to implement asset management practices.
The Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) has created this
Public Transportation Transit Asset Management Plan (PT-TAMP) to
summarize CTDOT’s transit assets, lay out the agency’s asset management
processes, and identify priority SGR investments. The PT-TAMP enhances
CTDOT’s ability to communicate with the Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs) and State Legislators regarding the performance of
the existing transit system and benefits of strategic investments to achieve
and maintain the system in SGR. CTDOT is also the sponsor of a group plan
for Tier II transit service providers in Connecticut.
A separate document has been developed to address the highway assets
maintained by CTDOT as mandated by the Federal Highway Administration.
Eventually, CTDOT intends to merge the documents into a comprehensive
asset management plan for the entire department.
Federal Legislative Context
Federal authorization (initially Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century or MAP-21 and more recently Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation or FAST Act) requires that recipients and subrecipients of
federal financial assistance develop TAM plans.
Transit providers may be required to either develop their own TAM plan or
participate in a Group TAM plan depending on whether they are Tier I or
Tier II. In 49 CFR 625.5, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) defines Tier
I and Tier II providers:
•
Tier I provider means a recipient that owns, operates, or manages
either (1) one hundred and one (101) or more vehicles in revenue
service during peak regular service across all fixed route modes or
in any one non-fixed route mode, or (2) rail transit.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-2
•
Tier II provider means a recipient that owns, operates, or manages
(1) one hundred (100) or fewer vehicles in revenue service during
peak regular service across all non-rail fixed route modes or in any
one non-fixed route mode, (2) a subrecipient under the 5311 Rural
Area Formula Program, (3) or any American Indian tribe.
A sponsor must develop a Group TAM plan for Tier II transit providers,
while Tier I providers must develop their own TAM plans. Tier II providers
may also choose to forgo the Group TAM plan and develop individual plans.
A Tier I TAM plan must include the following nine elements, while a Group
plan must include only elements 1 thru 4:
1. Capital asset inventory
2. Condition assessment
3. Description of analytical processes or decision support tools
4. Investment prioritization
5. TAM and SGR policy
6. TAM plan implementation strategy
7. Key TAM activities
8. List of resources to implement the plan
9. Outline of how a provider will monitor, update, and evaluate the
plan
Each provider, Tier I or Tier II, must designate an accountable executive
who is responsible for accepting and approving the TAM plan and SGR
targets.
A Group TAM plan must include a list of participants in the plan. The
sponsor must coordinate development of a Group TAM plan with each
participant’s accountable executive and must make the completed plan
available to all participants.
A TAM plan must cover a period of four years. The initial TAM plan must be
completed by October 1, 2018, and the plan must be updated every four
years.
Agency Overview
CTDOT owns, operates and maintains a multi-modal transportation
network composed of highway assets and transit assets. CTDOT owns or
subsidizes nearly all of Connecticut’s public transportation services,
including commuter rail, bus, bus rapid transit, paratransit, and ferry
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-3
services. CTDOT is a Tier I agency and provides over 43 million annual
passenger trips on bus and ADA service and more than 41 million annual
passenger trips on rail service.
CTDOT is unique compared to other DOT’s in that CTDOT is a transit service
provider within the State of Connecticut. As part of its service delivery
model, CTDOT brands its own transit services throughout the state for bus,
ferry, and rail operations.
CTDOT has direct capital responsibility for billions of dollars of transit assets
in Connecticut, but contracts out the operation of transit service to private
companies. To meet the requirements for developing a TAM plan,
established in the final rule on TAM by FTA, CTDOT is obligated to collect
data, manage, and report on transit assets throughout the state.
The following sections summarize CTDOT transit services.
Bus Network
CTDOT owns the local bus systems in Hartford, New Haven, Stamford,
Waterbury, New Britain, Bristol, Meriden and Wallingford, and operates
them under the CTtransit brand name. CTDOT has a contract with First
Transit to operate the services in Stamford, New Haven and Hartford and
with other private providers for services in New Britain, Bristol, Waterbury,
Meriden and Wallingford. In all eight of these service areas the state is fully
responsible for all operating deficits and capital costs. Additionally, CTDOT
contracts with First Transit and four private companies for the operation of
express bus services to Hartford.
CTtransit Hartford Division operates over 30 local and 12 express bus
routes. Local routes operate 7 days a week, serving 26 towns in the Capital
Region. CTtransit's Hartford Division makes connections with Middletown
Area Transit, and the CTtransit New Britain division.
CTtransit New Haven Division operates 7 days a week over 22 local routes,
connecting with other state-owned or subsidized bus services in Meriden,
Wallingford, Milford, and the lower Naugatuck Valley areas, as well as with
the New Haven Line and Shore Line East rail services.
CTtransit Stamford Division operates 15 local bus routes 7 days a week.
CTtransit Stamford buses connect with other state-subsidized services in
Norwalk, with the New Haven Line in several locations, the Harlem Line on
Metro-North Railroad, and with Bee-Line buses in Westchester County New
York. The Stamford Division also operates the I-BUS, an express service
between downtown Stamford and White Plains, New York.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-4
CTtransit Waterbury Division operates fixed route and ADA paratransit
services in the Waterbury area through a contract with the North-East
Transportation Company Incorporated, LLC. Fixed route and paratransit bus
service is provided to Waterbury, Watertown, Middlebury, Wolcott,
Prospect and Naugatuck Monday through Saturday.
CTtransit New Britain Division and Bristol Division are serviced through
contract with New Britain Transportation Company (NBT) which operates
10 bus routes in Berlin, New Britain, Cromwell, Newington, Plainville, Bristol
and Meriden. Fixed route bus service operates Monday through Saturday.
Also, DATTCO operates fixed route service in New Britain on the East Street
and South Street routes through contracted services. Complementary
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) service is operated by First Transit
and administered by the Greater Hartford Transit District.
CTtransit Meriden Division and Wallingford Division operates fixed route
services in their respective areas through a contract with North-East
Transportation Company Inc. LLC, with 4 local routes. Complementary ADA
services are also operated by North-East Transportation Company Inc. LLC.
CTfastrak, one of Connecticut’s primary transit system assets is a dedicated
bus rapid transit line along a 9.4-mile corridor between downtown New
Britain and downtown Hartford. The system was launched in March 2015
and operates 7 days a week under CTtransit Hartford. CTfastrak permits bus
access at intermediate points, so that circulator buses that provide service
on routes in surrounding neighborhoods can then use the busway corridor,
thus providing a one-seat ride. In addition, CTfastrak includes express,
shuttle, circulator, and connecting feeder bus service to surrounding
Towns.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-5
Ferry
CTDOT owns and operates two historic Connecticut River ferries; one that
connects Rocky Hill to Glastonbury (CT Route 160) and another that connects
Chester to Hadlyme (CT Route 148). The Rocky Hill-Glastonbury Ferry is a tug
(CUMBERLAND) and barge (HOLLISTER III) operation that can carry 3-4 cars at a
time. The nation's oldest continuously operating ferry service crosses the
Connecticut River between Rocky Hill and Glastonbury.
The Rocky Hill - Glastonbury Ferry is a unique element in the Region's
transportation services. The ferry plays a special role in serving local vehicular
traffic between Rocky Hill and Glastonbury, and it plays an important role for
bicyclists. The ferry operates seasonally from May 1st to Oct 31st, 7 days a week.
The Chester - Hadlyme Ferry (SELDEN III) is a typical double ended ferry boat
that can carry 9 cars and 49 passengers between Chester and Hadlyme. The
Selden III, was built in 1949. It is an open, self-propelled craft, 65 feet long and
30 feet wide. The ferry operates seasonally from April 1st to Nov 30th, 7 days a
week.
Rail Network
The rail network in Connecticut consists of 628.5 miles of guideway, divided
into two main classifications: Passenger Rail and Freight Rail. CTDOT has
varying levels of responsibility to oversee the safe and efficient movement
of trains across all rail lines throughout the State that carries people, goods,
and services on a daily basis.
CTDOT provides three main passenger rail services across Connecticut that
serve numerous towns across most regions. These services are the New
Haven Line, Shore Line East (SLE), and the Hartford Line (HL), and are all
governed by unique contract agreements. These services collectively within
the State of Connecticut are referred to as CT-rail.
The New Haven Line is a commuter rail service that has been in existence
since 1983, operated under an agreement called the Amended and
Restated Service Agreement (ARSA). CTDOT is part of this joint operating
agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which
established Metro North Railroad (MNR) in part to operate service along
the New Haven Line and maintain infrastructure along the 72-mile segment
between New Haven and Grand Central in New York, along with three
additional Branch Line Services (New Canaan, Danbury, and Waterbury). As
part of the agreement, each agency owns fixed infrastructure along the
route within their respective States, and splits ownership of the rolling
stock that operates along these routes. MNR additionally operates service
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-6
and maintains infrastructure along the Harlem Line and Hudson Line in New
York State for the MTA. CTDOT and MNR are subject to FTA’s TAM
requirements for infrastructure they hold capital responsibility to regarding
these services.
SLE is a commuter rail service that originated in 1990, providing service
along a portion of the Northeast Corridor (NEC) from New Haven to New
London. The service is fully subsidized by CTDOT, with Amtrak under
contract to operate the service as well as perform maintenance throughout
the system. Amtrak owns all fixed infrastructure along this route, while
CTDOT owns the rolling stock and is the lessee to five of the seven SLE
stations that are owned by Amtrak. While Amtrak is not subject to FTA
regulations for the TAM program, CTDOT is still obligated to report on its
owned rolling stock and stations that are leased to them.
The Hartford Line is a high-speed intercity passenger rail system that
opened in June of 2018, providing expanded service between New Haven,
Hartford, and Springfield, MA. The new line provides up to 17 round trips
per day along the 62 mile route and includes recent major infrastructure
investment to upgrade the line to support frequent service. While Amtrak
owns all fixed infrastructure along this route, CTDOT has supplemented
significant investment into this corridor, and has a need to track
infrastructure spending and asset condition to sustain levels of service.
Because this line is defined by FTA as intercity, it is not subject to FTA TAM
regulations.
CTDOT also owns five additional freight rail routes within Connecticut, and
supports in total 10 different freight operators that run on a combination of
state-owned and privately owned freight routes. Although CTDOT has a
financial interest and some capital responsibility for freight rail networks,
these assets are also exempt from FTA TAM requirements and are also not
reflected within this initial plan. For more information on Asset
Management for these assets, please refer to CTDOT’s State Rail Plan and
Freight Plan.
Agency Structure Regarding TAM
Organizational alignment and support for TAM is a key element for
program success. The PT-TAMP-building and updating process itself brings
together the agency’s stakeholders, disciplines, and business processes to
work towards a common understanding of the transportation asset
management mission and objectives, explained in detail in chapter two.
CTDOT is organized into five bureaus: Engineering & Construction; Finance
& Administration; Highway Operations; Policy & Planning; and Public
Transportation. The Bureau of Engineering & Construction leadership
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-7
initiated this effort to implement TAM to improve decision-making processes
throughout the agency.
As part of this effort, CTDOT designated key TAM roles, formed a TAM
Steering Committee, and staffed a Transportation Asset Management Group.
The current agency structure for TAM is presented in Figure 1-1.
The Agency Sponsor for TAM is the Deputy Commissioner of Transportation
and Chief Operating Officer. The Agency Chairperson for TAM is the
Division Chief of Facilities and Transit.
The TAM Steering Committee includes representatives from the Commissioner’s
Office and all five bureaus. The role of each member of this committee is to
support and recognize the value of TAM for CTDOT and the State of Connecticut.
The Committee acts as a liaison to bureaus and divisions to ensure that each
area’s interests are properly represented and to ensure each area is supporting
the TAM initiatives.
CTDOT Transportation Asset Management Organizational Structure
FHWA
Executive Team Oversight
Engineering & Construction Bureau Chief
Policy & Planning Bureau Chief
Engineering Administrator
Agency Sponsor
Deputy Comr.
Transportation Asset Management Group
TAM Implementation Lead
Asset Working Groups
TAM Consultant
Public Transportation Asset Management Sub-Group
TAM Public Transportation Implementation Lead
FTA
Asset Management Steering Committee
Chair
Division
ChairChief
Division Chief
Division Chief
Facilities
& Chief
Transit
Division
Bridges
Highways
Engineering
Facilities
and Transit
Engineering
Engineering
Engineering
Division Chief
Traffic
Manager
Capital Services
Engineering
Finance & Admin
Director
Maintenance
Highway Operations
Administrator
Transit
Administrator
Rail
Public Transportation
Public Transportation
Manager
Information Systems
Plant Fac. Engineer 2
Property & Facilities
Finance & Admin
Transit Manager
Public Transportation
Assistant Director
Strat. Plan. & Proj.
Policy & Planning
Office of Comr.
Figure 1-1. CTDOT TAM Organizational Structure
The Bureau of Public Transportation has a Transit Asset Management Unit
(PT TAM Unit) within the Office of Program Management that reports to
the Bureau Chief. The PT TAM Unit is responsible for preparing the Tier I
and Tier II TAM Plans, collaborating with contracted transit providers for
National Transit Database (NTD) reporting requirements for PT-TAMP, and
coordinating with the agency lead for future development of CTDOT’s
multimodal TAM plan. An Implementation Committee will be created to
support future TAM implementation activities. The current Bureau of Public
Transportation structure for TAM is presented in Figure 1-2.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-8
CTDOT Transit Asset Management Organizational Structure
Public Transportation
Bureau Chief
FTA
Rail Administrator
Transit Manager
Transportation
Supervising Engineer
Public Transportation
TAM Implementation
Lead
Planner 1
Engineer 2
Figure 1-2. Bureau of Public Transportation TAM Organizational Structure
Rev. 8/3/18
PT-TAMP
Purpose of the PT-TAMP
The PT-TAMP is a federally-required document intended to document TAM
practices and processes at CTDOT. The PT-TAMP will help CTDOT manage
transit assets to enhance safety, reduce maintenance costs, increase
reliability, and improve performance. TAM will help CTDOT maintain the
transportation system in SGR with the most efficient use of financial
resources.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-9
649
422
3
Bus Rolling Stock
Rail Rolling Stock
Ferryboats
76
43
243
Bus Service Vehicles
Rail Service Vehicles
Track Miles of Rail
Guideway
9.4
12
53
Miles of bus-only guideway
Administrative/Maintenance
Facilities
Passenger Facilities
Figure 1-3. CTDOT PT-TAMP Inventory Summary
Scope of the PT-TAMP
CTDOT is a Tier I transit provider offering service across multiple modes,
including bus, bus rapid transit, rail, and ferry. This PT-TAMP covers assets
across the four categories defined by FTA: rolling stock, equipment,
infrastructure, and facilities. A summary of transit assets in this plan is shown
in Figure 1-3.
CTDOT, a multi-modal agency, has also completed its initial Highways
Transportation Asset Management Plan in accordance with Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) requirements.
Awareness of other CTDOT plans, such as those listed below, is important for
context and alignment with the PT-TAMP.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-10
Related CTDOT Plans
Transportation Infrastructure Capital Plan Report
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=1383&Q=454340
Let’s Go CT!
http://www.transformct.info
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=3529&q=447186
Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=1383&q=259760
State Freight Plan
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=4719&Q=561266
State Rail Plan
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=1386&q=437648
CTDOT Highway Transportation Asset Management Plan
http://www.ct.gov/dot/lib/dot/documents/dplansprojectsstudies/plans/ctdot-tamp-fhwa-certified-20180724.pdf
PT-TAMP Building Process
The PT-TAMP building process began in July 2017. A wide range of CTDOT
organizational units and representatives from the contracted CTDOT transit
service providers in addition to FTA were involved in the development of
this PT-TAMP.
The PT TAM Unit reviewed existing asset hierarchies and developed new
asset hierarchies, developed approaches for assessing asset condition, and
modeled SGR needs. Documents produced during these initial stages laid
the foundation for the writing of the PT-TAMP. Asset fact sheets were also
developed as part of the PT-TAMP building process to provide quick
reference summaries for each asset highlighting the asset’s inventory and
condition, targets, and needs. Fact sheets for rolling stock, rail
infrastructure, facilities, and equipment are in Appendix A.
CTDOT also formed working groups of relevant staff for the Tier I plan,
including representatives from CTDOT, Hartford-New Haven-Stamford
organization (CTtransit), and MNR. The working groups supported the
development of the PT-TAMP and met periodically to review and provide
feedback on the PT-TAMP development process.
This PT-TAMP is a living document that will be reviewed and updated every
four years.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Introduction
1-11
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
CHAPTER 2
Goals and
Objectives
Identifying goals and objectives is an important
step in developing transit asset management
practices and processes at an agency. CTDOT has
established agency-wide goals and objectives that
apply across CTDOT divisions, districts, and modes
of travel. These goals and objectives help focus
agency operations, drive improved performance,
and influence investments in transit assets.
CTDOT’s TAM goals and objectives constitute a
commitment to maintaining assets in a state of
good repair. This commitment will yield benefits
for riders by improving transit service and for the
agency by reducing costs.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
CTDOT’s mission and vision are guiding principles that shape TAM policy and
transit goals and objectives. Goals and objectives help define and guide the
TAM program at CTDOT and are an integral part of the PT-TAMP. Goals are
broad statements of ideas to reach a desired outcome or ideal state of the
transit system in Connecticut. Objectives should be SMART: specific,
measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely steps that will help make progress
towards attaining those goals.
This chapter presents CTDOT’s mission, vision, and goals and objectives. The
chapter also defines SGR and identifies existing state performance measures
and TAM objectives that will be used to develop TAM policies.
Federal Legislative Context
FTA requires Tier I providers to include a TAM and SGR policy in their TAM
Plan. FTA defines TAM policy as “a transit provider’s documented commitment
to achieving and maintaining SGR for all of its capital assets. The TAM policy
defines the transit provider’s TAM objectives and defines and assigns roles and
responsibilities for meeting those objectives.”
SGR is defined by FTA as “the condition in which a capital asset is able to
operate at a full level of performance.” The FTA final rule on transit asset
management further defines SGR in §625.41:
“A capital asset is in a state of good repair if it meets the following objective
standards:
•
The capital asset is able to perform its designed function
•
The use of the asset in its current condition does not pose an identified
unacceptable safety risk
•
The life-cycle investment needs of the asset have been met or
recovered, including all scheduled maintenance, rehabilitation, and
replacements.”
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Goals and Objectives
State of Good
Repair
The condition in
which a capital asset
is able to operate at a
full level of
performance.
2-2
Goals and Objectives
The highest-level guiding principles at CTDOT are the vision and mission. These
principles influence transportation goals and objectives across the agency.
Vision and Mission
Connecticut strives to achieve a nationally competitive transportation system
that is multi-modal, resilient, and long-lasting; addresses capacity issues; and
helps the economy.
CTDOT Vision & Mission
CTDOT’s vision is to lead, inspire, and motivate a progressive, responsive
team, striving to exceed customer expectations.
CTDOT’s mission is to provide a safe and efficient intermodal
transportation network that improves the quality of life and promotes
economic vitality for the State and the region.
CTDOT’s Bureau of Public Transportation has its own mission which closely
aligns with the overall CTDOT mission.
Bureau of Public Transportation Mission
CTDOT Values
• Measurable results
• Customer service
• Quality of life
• Accountability &
integrity
• Excellence
The mission of the Bureau of Public Transportation is for the development,
maintenance, and operation of a safe and efficient system of motor carrier,
rail facilities and maritime assets for the movement of people and goods,
such as Bus Transit, Rail Operations, Ferries, State Pier Facilities and
Ridesharing programs.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Goals and Objectives
2-3
CTDOT’s vision and mission are further detailed in the 2018 Long-Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP) vision.
Long-Range Transportation Plan Vision
•
The economy is strong because improved and sustained multimodal
and intermodal transportation contribute to an environment in which
businesses and people thrive.
•
Travel is safe and high safety standards are sustained on all modes of
transport.
•
Transportation infrastructure is in a state of good repair.
•
Transportation services provide efficient mobility for people and goods,
both within and beyond state borders.
•
Congestion is managed.
•
The natural environment is protected, air quality is good, and energy is
conserved.
•
Urban, suburban, and rural centers are transformed into livable
communities that provide opportunities for walking and bicycling and
are enhanced by accessible transportation systems.
CTDOT views maintaining condition of its transportation infrastructure as
critical to its mission. One of the key goals in the LRTP is:
•
Infrastructure in a state of good repair to improve reliability and
reduce costs to users.
Long-Range
Transportation
Plan
CTDOT’s federally
required LRTP covers
years 2018-2050 and
serves as a
framework for nearand long-term
transportation
decision making. The
plan encourages
performance-based
planning and
programming and
supports the
implementation of
TAM at CTDOT.
Maintaining asset condition also supports other goals mentioned in the LRTP,
including:
•
Economic growth with efficient and effective transportation for
people and goods
•
Safe and secure travel for people and goods for all modes
•
Resilient transportation systems
Maintaining transit assets in a SGR helps support CTDOT goals and TAM
objectives. In addition to CTDOT’s vision, mission, and LRTP goals, the agency
has devoted particular attention to pursing TAM policy and practices.
Summary of TAM Objectives
CTDOT has adopted a set of TAM objectives that are aligned with the vision
and mission of the agency. These objectives are helping to steer CTDOT as it
develops, refines, and implements TAM policies, processes, and practices.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Goals and Objectives
2-4
CTDOT has also incorporated transit providers TAM objectives to ensure
consistency and garner their further support of the States TAM program.
TAM Objectives
•
Attain the best asset conditions achievable, given available resources
•
Deliver an efficient and effective asset management program that
preserves, expands, and modernizes the state’s transportation
infrastructure
•
Enhance communications and ensure transparency about capital
programming prioritization and investment decisions
•
Achieve and maintain compliance with federal asset management rules
•
Maintain federal and state funded assets in SGR
•
Ensure safety of customers through asset management
•
Pursue other funding sources to sustain the State’s TAM program
Performance measures, targets, and SGR modeling capabilities are being
developed to help achieve CTDOT TAM objectives. These tools, systems, and
practices are being linked so that CTDOT can operate more effectively and
make progress towards federal requirements and state goals.
CTDOT currently has a performance measures initiative called “On The Move”,
that provides a series of performance measure reports that focus on results
and accountability. The measures link to CTDOT’s core mission and are
reviewed by CTDOT’s Performance Measures Standing Committee to
determine their usefulness in helping CTDOT make strategic decisions for
managing its assets. The measures are communicated to CTDOT through an
online performance dashboard. In addition to monitoring existing Performance
Measures related to asset management, CTDOT will incorporate the new TAM
performance measures required by NTD into the Dashboard to ensure assets
are constantly in SGR. The Dashboard currently has existing state performance
measures tied to Public Transit Assets, and can be found at:
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=3815&q=448402.
Applied to transit assets, the above goals and objectives translate into a
commitment to make investments, where possible, to achieve and maintain a
SGR for transit assets. These assets include revenue vehicles, equipment,
infrastructure, and facilities. Asset inventory and condition are described in
chapter three Inventory and Condition.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Goals and Objectives
2-5
CTDOT Bureau of Public Transportation plays a major role for supporting these
objectives for transit assets. Further details on roles and responsibilities are
included in chapter seven, Implementation and Monitoring.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Goals and Objectives
2-6
CHAPTER 3
Inventory
and
Condition
Inventory and condition data are the building block
upon which investment decisions are made.
Inventory and condition data are also valuable for
communicating the extent of CTDOT’s assets and
the state of those assets. Accurate inventory and
condition data support asset management
practices such as predicting asset conditions,
projecting funding needs, and prioritizing
investments.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
This chapter presents a summary of CTDOT’s transit asset inventory and its
condition. CTDOT’s PT-TAMP addresses rail, bus, and ferryboat revenue
vehicles, equipment, infrastructure, and rail and bus facilities.
Federal Legislative Context
FTA requires that a Tier I provider’s TAMP include an inventory and condition
assessment of all capital assets for which the provider has direct capital
responsibility. The inventory and condition assessment must be at a level of
detail sufficient to model asset condition and support investment
prioritization.
As part of the TAM plan rule, transit providers are also required to set
performance targets for performance measures defined by FTA in 49 CFR
§625.43. These are listed below.
FTA SGR Performance Measures for Capital Assets
•
Rolling Stock: The performance measure for rolling stock is the
percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset class that
have either met or exceeded their useful life benchmark (ULB). ULB
is maximum age of an asset based on operational characteristics
(age, mileage, environment) before it is replaced or enters into SGR
backlog.
•
Equipment: The performance measure for non-revenue, supportservice and maintenance vehicles equipment is the percentage of
those vehicles that have either met or exceeded their ULB.
•
Infrastructure: The performance measure for rail fixed guideway is
the percentage of track segments with speed restrictions.
•
Facilities: The performance measure for facilities is the percentage
of facilities within an asset class, rated below condition 3 on the
FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) scale.1
Useful Life
Benchmark
ULB is the maximum
age of an asset based
on operational
characteristics (age,
mileage, environment)
before it is replaced or
enters into SGR
backlog.
Each year, a transit provider must set targets with a one-year horizon based on
the most recent data and expected funding. These targets are reported
annually to the NTD, as defined by 49 CFR Section 630. A provider must also
1
See chapter four for full definition of TERM
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-2
coordinate with states and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the
setting of performance targets.
Connecticut PT-TAMP Assets
Connecticut’s multi-modal transportation system consists of a wide variety of
physical assets, as depicted in Figure 3-1.
Figure 3-1. Transportation Assets in Connecticut
This plan focuses on four transit asset categories: rolling stock, equipment,
infrastructure, facilities. These are the four asset categories defined by FTA and
required for inclusion in the PT-TAMP. CTDOT has broken down the four asset
categories into asset classes. CTDOT owns or operates rail, bus, and ferry
passenger service; equipment; rail and bus rapid transit infrastructure; and
passenger and maintenance facilities. The PT-TAMP asset hierarchy is
presented in Figure 3-2.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-3
Figure 3-2. PT-TAMP Asset Hierarchy
CTDOT Transit System Summary
Assets included in this plan are as follows2:
2
•
649 buses
•
422 rail vehicles
•
3 ferryboats
•
119 service vehicles
•
243 track miles of rail guideway
•
9.4 miles of bus-only guideway
•
12 administrative / maintenance facilities
•
53 passenger facilities
Data as of 3/20/18
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-4
Bus
Tier I and Tier II bus service in Connecticut is shown in Figure 3-3.
Figure 3-3. Bus Service in Connecticut
As described in chapter One, CTDOT owns and provides bus service, branded
CTtransit, throughout Connecticut, but contracts out operation to private
companies.
CTDOT also owns the bus rapid transit system CTfastrak, which operates on
fixed guideway between Hartford and New Britain under CTtransit Hartford.
According to FTA, bus rapid transit differs from bus transit in that the majority
of each line operates in a separated right-of-way (ROW) dedicated for public
transportation use during peak periods. Bus rapid transit also can include
defined stations; traffic signal priority for transit vehicles; short headway
bidirectional services; and pre-board ticketing, platform level boarding, and
separate branding.
The CTfastrak system between New Britain and Hartford opened in March
2015 and reached a milestone in 2016 carrying its four millionth customer
since opening day and routinely transporting more than 20,000 customers
daily.
The primary assets of the bus service system in Connecticut are rolling stock,
equipment and facilities. The majority of the primary bus assets in Connecticut
are owned and supported with State and Federal funds. Connecticut owns all
the rolling stock and equipment of CT Transit and maintenance facilities of six
of the divisions of CT Transit in Hartford, New Haven, Stamford, Waterbury,
Meriden and Wallingford.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-5
Passenger Rail
Passenger rail service is shown below in Figure 3-4 below.
Figure 3-4. Passenger Rail Service in Connecticut
The CT-Rail network is mostly composed of the Northeast Corridor (NEC), a
larger regional network of rail that connects Boston to Washington D.C.
through Amtrak and other Commuter Rail services. The passenger rail network
in Connecticut over which CTDOT services operate or has capital responsibility
comprises the New Haven Line and branch lines, Shore Line East, and the
Hartford Line.
The New Haven Line and Branch Lines represents the 48 mile segment of the
NEC from the CT-NY State Line to New Haven, and the three separate branch
lines supplementing the main New Haven Line service that terminates at Grand
Central Terminal. The Main Line is generally a four track corridor electrified
through an overhead contact system (OCS) to support a fleet that is mostly
comprised of Electric Multiple Units (EMU). The branch lines are three
additional single track routes considered as supplemental services that connect
to the main line with less frequent service. The branch line services provided
are the New Canaan, Danbury, and Waterbury, with segment mileages of 8, 24,
and 27 miles respectively. The New Canaan branch is also electrified with
overhead contact power that supports EMU Fleet while Danbury and
Waterbury operate diesel only rolling stock. All lines except Waterbury use
Centralized Traffic Control (CTC) signal systems, which uses manual block to
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-6
date. The system also comprises 38 passenger stations and 5
administrative/maintenance facilities (four rail yards and one standalone
facility).
As stated in the ARSA mentioned in chapter one, CTDOT holds 100% capital
responsibility for all fixed infrastructure along these routes. The New Haven
Line continues west into New York State for about another 14 miles; however,
this portion of the line is owned by MTA/MNR meaning CTDOT has no capital
responsibility for this segment. CTDOT holds at least partial capital
responsibility for all passenger facilities and 100% capital responsibility for the
administrative/maintenance facilities on the Connecticut side of the New
Haven Line. Rolling stock used along the line has a split ownership between
CTDOT and MTA/MNR, and is denoted by vehicle number in each agency’s
inventory.
Shore Line East operates along the segment of the NEC from New Haven to
New London, which is owned and maintained by Amtrak. This corridor spans
approximately 50 miles, and is generally two tracks with passing sidings
installed in various locations with OCS and CTC. Although the line is electrified
through OCS, Shore Line East service currently uses diesel rolling stock which is
owned by CTDOT. The service has 7 total passenger stations (not including
New Haven Stations which are part of New Haven Line) and no SLE exclusive
administrative/ maintenance facilities (New Haven Rail Yard is part of New
Haven Line). Since Amtrak owns this portion of the Northeast Corridor, CTDOT
only has capital responsibility for 5 of the 7 stations and diesel rolling stock but
may help fund rail infrastructure projects along this route to provide financial
assistance for Amtrak. The NEC within Connecticut continues past New London
to the CT-RI state line, but only serves regional intercity Amtrak trains.
The Hartford Line represents a spur of the NEC, but is also the supporting rail
network for the new Hartford Line intercity rail service that is provided
through CTDOT. This line spans 62 miles from New Haven to Springfield, and is
generally two tracks with no OCS and new Positive Train Control (PTC)
installed, with a few segments that are single track north of Hartford. The
service is operating existing Amtrak diesel locomotives and push-pull coaches,
as well as recently leased diesel locomotives and push-pulls coaches operated
by Trans America Services and Alternate Concepts Incorporated (TASCI).
Occasionally, the Hartford Line will utilize Shore Line East diesel locomotive
and passenger coaches. The service currently has 7 stations (includes
Springfield, MA; but excludes the two New Haven stations) and no exclusive
administrative / maintenance facilities (uses New Haven Rail Yard which is part
of New Haven Line) along the route. Similar to SLE, Amtrak owns this corridor
meaning CTDOT holds no capital responsibility even though the majority of the
recent upgrades to the line used Connecticut state funds. Although CTDOT has
leased a portion of the rolling stock used for this new service, any assets used
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-7
in the operation of the Hartford line are exempt from FTA TAM requirements
as mentioned in chapter one and therefore are not reflected in the current
inventory.
Asset Data and Inventory Development
Monitoring and measuring transit asset conditions enables CTDOT to assess
the performance of the transit system, analyze deficiencies and predict future
needs, allocate funding, and prioritize investments to maintain SGR. Asset
condition is also an important public-facing measure. Users of the transit
network notice and experience asset condition every day and recognize
changes in asset condition. Further, public trust and confidence is bolstered
when objective measurable results can be demonstrated from increased public
investment. For depicting asset conditions, this PT-TAMP uses definitions of
asset condition and SGR developed by CTDOT and consistent with FTA’s
mandated performance measures.
In CTDOT’s Transit Gap Analysis, conducted prior to the development of the
PT-TAMP, one gap was that CTDOT lacked a sophisticated asset inventory
system that contained sufficient data to support capital decision-making.
CTDOT’s existing system for inventory tracking is a statewide financial
management system called CORE-CT that is stewarded by the Bureau of
Finance and Administration. While CORE-CT provides useful information such
as asset ID’s, asset age, and asset costs, the system provides limited asset
management capabilities. As part of the development of the PT-TAMP, CTDOT
defined and populated an asset inventory, the SGR Transit Database.
Communication
The PT-TAMP is a
valuable tool to
communicate needs
and to advocate for
resources.
The first task was to establish the definition of a capital asset and to define an
asset hierarchy. Inventory data on transit assets in Connecticut historically has
been maintained at a unit level as opposed to an enterprise level, which
provided varying definitions of assets and their conditions. While FTA set the
four major asset categories required for the PT-TAMP, the PT TAM Unit had to
coordinate with providers and staff to determine what should be considered a
capital asset, what information should be collected, and where it should be
stored.
The second task was the collection of inventory data from the transit service
providers and CTDOT Capital Services unit. Transit asset inventory and
condition data was collected from the individual transit service providers and
authenticated by the PT TAM Unit. Data was input into the SGR Transit
Database after final validation of the transit asset inventory by the PT TAM
Unit. The data resources contributing to the SGR Transit Database are depicted
in Figure 3-5.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-8
Figure 3-5. Data Resources for SGR Inventory
Rolling Stock and Equipment
Bus
The PT TAM Unit held several meetings with working groups composed of the
transit service providers and CTDOT staff. The process of developing an asset
inventory is one of the key elements of the TAMP Plan. Transit asset inventory
was collected from the individual transit service providers and authenticated
against CTDOT Capital Services database and the CORE-CT financial register.
This step was integral in the process as many of Connecticut transit assets are
owned, maintained and operated by the transit service providers thus do not
register in the CORE-CT financial record but are subsidized 100% by CTDOT
with state and federal funds. Verified bus data was imported into the SGR
Transit Database.
Rail
Inventory data including model year (used to determine age) are stored by
vehicle in the Office of Rail’s Rolling Stock Inventory Database. For the purpose
of developing its PT-TAMP, CTDOT extracted revenue vehicle data from this
database, aggregated it by fleet, and imported the data into the SGR Transit
Database.
Infrastructure
Bus Rapid Transit
CTDOT has begun the initial steps of data collection on CTfastrak guideway for
inventory and condition assessment. Details of the condition assessment
process are outlined in chapter seven. Future CTfastrak data will be imported
into the SGR Transit Database.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-9
Rail Guideway
The system of record for data on the rail guideway inventory is the set of track
charts maintained for the NEC and branch lines. The charts show locations of
major assets, and detail when assets were most recently rehabilitated.
As a supplement to the track charts, MNR maintains a less detailed, summary
inventory of rail guideway assets for use in preparation of the MTA Twenty
Year Needs Assessment (TYNA). The MNR data were imported into the SGR
Transit Database and used to populate data on Track and Power in the CTDOT
PT-TAMP.
CTDOT’s existing structures data were used to populate the data for the
structure asset class. Inventory and condition data for bridges are gathered
through the bridge inspection process. The data are stored in CTDOT’s Bridge
Management System (BMS) using customized InspectTech software and
updated based on inspections, which happen most commonly on an annual
basis per FRA regulations. Existing structures data were imported into the SGR
Transit Database.
Facilities
Administrative/Maintenance
Inventory data on Connecticut facilities are stored in CTDOT’s Financial
Management System (CORE-CT) and the transit providers’ asset registries, but
the level of detail stored on each facility varies. Thus, for the purpose of
developing its PT-TAMP, CTDOT extracted data on administrative/maintenance
facilities from CORE-CT and imported the data to the SGR Transit Database.
Component-level condition data are not available for all administrative /
maintenance facilities. However, the overall condition of CTDOT-owned
facilities has been previously established through engineering judgements
when data was unavailable. Thus, component-level conditions were manually
determined for each facility using the available component-level data, overall
facility condition, and facility age.
Passenger
Inventory data on CTDOT facilities and the level of detail stored on each facility
is limited. Thus, for the purpose of developing its PT-TAMP, CTDOT extracted
data on passenger facilities from various sources.
Existing condition data available for passenger facilities varied by specific type
of facility. For these facilities, component-level conditions were manually
determined for each facility using the overall facility condition and facility age.
For rail stations, more detailed assessments were recently performed. The
Design Unit of the Office of Rail conducted an evaluation, visual inspection and
limited physical testing of the platforms/canopies, station buildings, and
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-10
pedestrian bridges (cross-track bridges and the bridges connecting the
platforms to adjacent parking structures) at 43 of Connecticut’s commuter rail
stations in early 2017. The information collected from this assessment was
used to establish current conditions of the platforms/canopies, station
buildings, and pedestrian bridges.
Rolling Stock
In 49 CFR §625.5, FTA defines rolling stock as a revenue vehicle used in
providing public transportation, including vehicles used for carrying passengers
on fare-free services. CTDOT’s PT-TAMP includes rolling stock operating in
three modes of travel: bus, commuter rail, and ferry.
Bus Rolling Stock
Bus transit is an integral piece of Connecticut’s public transportation system.
Buses provide affordable, equitable, and reliable mobility to Connecticut
travelers. FTA defines the bus transit mode as comprised of rubber-tired
passenger vehicles operating on fixed routes and schedules over roadways.
Vehicles can be powered by diesel, gasoline, battery, or alternative fuel
engines contained within the vehicle.
As stated in chapter one, CTDOT owns the local bus systems in Hartford, New
Haven, Stamford, Waterbury, New Britain, Bristol, Meriden, and Wallingford,
and operates them under the CT transit brand name. CTDOT owns all the
rolling stock that provides CTtransit services. CTtransit services carry roughly
80% of annual bus ridership in Connecticut.
CTtransit Hartford, the largest of the eight divisions operates CTfastrak and
provides service using a fleet of rolling stock which includes articulated buses,
transit buses and over the road Motor Coach Industries (MCI’s). CTtransit New
Haven operates a fleet which includes both articulated and transit buses.
CTtransit Stamford, the smallest of the Hartford, New Haven, Stamford (HNS)
operations include articulated buses, transit buses and over the road Motor
Coach Industries (MCI) in their fleet.
CTtransit divisions of Waterbury, Meriden and Wallingford provide service
through North-East Transportation Company Inc. The fleet includes transit
buses and cutaways for both fixed route and paratransit service.
New Britain and Bristol divisions of CTtransit are provided through the private
companies of New Britain Transportation and Dattco whose fleets include both
transit buses and over the road MCIs.
Rolling Stock
Revenue vehicle used in
providing public
transportation
CTtransit
CTtransit is the brand
name for CTDOT-owned
bus service across
Connecticut. Several
companies, including
Datto, North-East
Transportation Company
Inc., New Britain
Transportation Co, and
Nason/Kelley are under
contract to CTDOT to
operate the bus service.
Nason/Kelley, a private operator contracted with CTDOT provides express bus
service utilizing a fleet which includes over the road MCIs.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-11
CTDOT’s rolling stock inventory is used to provide both fixed route and demand
response service, and includes a number of asset types. FTA defines these vehicle
types in the 2017 NTD Glossary3.
Bus Types
Transit Bus: A transit mode comprised of
rubber-tired passenger vehicles
operating on fixed routes and schedules
over roadways. Vehicles are powered by:
• Diesel
• Gasoline
• Battery
• Alternative fuel engines contained
within the vehicle.
Articulated Bus: Extra-long (54 ft. to 60 ft.)
bus with two connected passenger
compartments. The rear body section is
connected to the main body by a joint
mechanism that allows the vehicles to bend
when in operation for sharp turns and curves
and yet have a continuous interior.
Over-the-road Bus: A bus characterized by an
elevated passenger deck located over a
baggage compartment.
3 FTA. National Transit Database Glossary. FTA, 2017.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-12
Cutaway: A vehicle that consists of a bus
body that is mounted on the chassis of a van
or light-duty truck. The original van or lightduty truck chassis may be reinforced or
extended. Cutaways typically seat 15 or
more passengers and may accommodate
some standing passengers.
Bus Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
The purpose of the rolling stock condition assessment is to provide an overall
snapshot of the current state of repair of a fleet to aid in decisions concerning
when it is most cost effective to replace it.
FTA’s mandated performance measure for rolling stock is the percentage of
assets within a class that have met or exceed their ULB. An asset is deemed to
be in SGR if its age is less than the ULB specified for the corresponding asset
type. Likewise, an asset is deemed to no longer be in SGR if its age equals or
exceeds the corresponding ULB. The ULB value may be specified in terms of
asset age, mileage and/or other factors. FTA provides a set of default ULB
values by asset type, all of which are specified in terms of asset age. An agency
can use these or set its own values.
CTDOT has worked with transit service providers in Connecticut to define
custom ULB values. The custom ULBs align more with the Connecticut
operating environment. The miles incurred by our vehicles annually can far
exceed the useful life of that vehicle class, particularly for cutaway bus, vans
and mini vans utilized for paratransit service.
The climate of New England further adds to the deterioration of vehicles
caused by salt and chemical treatments of the roads in Connecticut.
Connecticut’s custom ULB values for bus rolling stock are listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1. ULB Values for Bus Rolling Stock
Asset Type
FTA Default ULB
(years)
Connecticut ULB
(years)
Transit Bus
14
12
Articulated Bus
14
12
Over-the-road Bus
14
12
Cutaway
10
5
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-13
Bus Inventory and Conditions
CTDOT owns 649 revenue vehicles, the majority of which are transit buses.
Table 3-2 summarizes CTDOT’s bus inventory and condition.
Table 3-2. CTDOT Bus Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Transit Bus
Articulated Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
Cutaway Bus
Inventory
Vehicles
below ULB
Vehicles met or
exceeded ULB
496
81%
19%
51
100%
0%
60
97%
3%
42
100%
0%
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
Rail Rolling Stock
CTDOT’s rail rolling stock consists of three vehicle types, as defined in the NTD
Glossary.
Rail Vehicle Types
Commuter Rail Locomotive: Commuter rail vehicles used to
pull or push passenger coaches. Locomotives do not carry
passengers themselves.
Commuter Rail Passenger Coach: Commuter rail passenger
vehicles not independently propelled and requiring one or more
locomotives for propulsion.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-14
Commuter Rail Self-Propelled Passenger Car: Commuter rail
passenger vehicles not requiring a separate locomotive for
propulsion.
Rail Rolling Stock Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
The condition assessment approach and performance measures are the same for
rail rolling stock as for bus rolling stock.
Connecticut’s ULB values for rail rolling stock are listed in Table 3-3.
Locomotives and passenger coaches have different custom ULBs depending on
the rail service due to differing use patterns and maintenance schedules.
Table 3-3. ULB Values for Rail Rolling Stock
FTA Default ULB
(years)
Connecticut ULB
(years)
Commuter Rail Locomotive (MNR)
39
35
Commuter Rail Locomotive (SLE/HL)
39
25
Commuter Rail Passenger Coach (MNR)
39
35
Commuter Rail Passenger Coach (SLE/HL)
39
25
Commuter Rail Self-Propelled Passenger Car
39
35
Asset Type
Rail Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 428 rail vehicles, the majority of which are EMUs. Of the EMUs,
there are 274 Kawasaki M8s and 36 General Electric M2s. CTDOT’s rail
inventory also includes 34 locomotives and 84 passenger coaches. Of the 84
Passenger Coaches, 51 are Bombardier’s used primarily on the Danbury and
Waterbury Branch Lines while 33 are Mafersa’s used for SLE and HL. Table 3-4
summarizes CTDOT’s rail rolling stock inventory and condition.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-15
Table 3-4. CTDOT Rail Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Inventory
Commuter Rail Locomotive (MNR)
Commuter Rail Locomotive (SLE/HL)
Commuter Rail passenger coach (MNR)
Commuter Rail passenger coach (SLE/HL)
Commuter Rail Self-Propelled Passenger Car
Vehicles
below ULB
Vehicles met or
exceeded ULB
22
46%
54%
12
0%
100%
50
100%
0%
33
0%
100%
310
88%
12%
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
Ferryboat
CTDOT owns and operates two historic Connecticut River ferries as referenced in
chapter one – one that connects Rocky Hill to Glastonbury, and another that
connects Chester to Hadlyme. FTA defines ferryboat in the 2017 NTD Glossary as a
transit mode comprised of vessels that carry passengers and/or vehicles over a
body of water and are generally steam or diesel powered.
Ferry Vehicle Types
Ferryboat: Vessels for carrying passengers and / or vehicles
over a body of water. The vessels are generally steam or diesel
powered conventional ferry vessels. They may also be
hovercraft, hydrofoil and other high-speed vessels.
Ferryboat Rolling Stock Condition Assessment and Performance
Measures
The condition assessment approach and performance measures are the same for
ferryboats as for all other rolling stock. Connecticut’s ULB values for ferryboat
rolling stock are listed in Table 3-5.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-16
Table 3-5. ULB Values for Ferryboat Rolling Stock
Asset Type
FTA Default ULB
(years)
Connecticut ULB
(years)
42
42
Ferryboat
Ferryboat Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 3 ferryboats: a double-ended, self-propelled ferry; a barge; and a
towboat. Table 3-6 summarizes CTDOT’s ferryboat inventory and condition.
Table 3-6. CTDOT Rail Rolling Stock Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Ferryboat
Inventory
3
vehicles
Vehicles
below ULB
Vehicles met or
exceeded ULB
0%
100%
Inventory data including model year (used to determine age) are stored by
vehicle in the SGR Transit Database.
Equipment
In 49 CFR §625.5, FTA defines equipment as an article of nonexpendable,
tangible property having a useful life of at least one year. In Connecticut’s case,
most equipment assets are service vehicles, defined by FTA as equipment used
primarily to support maintenance and repair work for public transportation.
Examples of service vehicles provided in the 2017 NTD Glossary include tow
trucks, supervisor vans, transit, staff cars, and maintenance vehicles for
maintaining passenger facilities and (ROW). CTDOT’s PT-TAMP includes service
vehicles supporting two modes of travel: bus and commuter rail.
Note that CTDOT’s inventory includes a small number of additional pieces of
equipment valued at $50,000 or more, but these are not detailed here. Please
refer to Appendix H for a detailed list.
CTDOT’s service vehicles are organized into five types. Trucks, automobiles,
Sport Utility Vehicles, and vans can be used as staff vehicles. Steel wheel
vehicles are used for inspection and maintenance of facilities and (ROW). The
definitions for these vehicles are shown on the next page.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-17
Service Vehicle Types
Automobiles: Passenger cars, up to and including
station wagons in size. Excludes minivans and
anything larger.
Rubber Tire Vehicles (Truck): Any motor vehicle
designed to transport Cargo
Sport Utility Vehicle: A high-performance four-wheel
drive car built on a truck chassis. It is a passenger
vehicle which combines the towing capacity of a
pickup truck with the passenger-carrying space of a
minivan or station wagon.
Van: An enclosed vehicle having a typical seating
capacity of 8 to 18 passengers and a driver. A van is
typically taller and with a higher floor than a
passenger car, such as a hatchback or station wagon.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-18
Steel Wheel Vehicle: Any support vehicle that is
solely used on a running rail.
Equipment Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
CTDOT uses the same basic approach for assessing condition of equipment as
it does for rolling stock. Specifically, a custom ULB value is established for
equipment type. A piece of equipment is assessed as being in SGR if its age is
less than the corresponding ULB, and not in SGR if it meets or exceeds the ULB.
This approach supports reporting of FTA’s mandated SGR performance
measure for equipment: the percentage of service vehicles that have met or
exceed their ULB. Connecticut’s custom ULBs for equipment are listed in Table
3-7.
Table 3-7. ULB Custom Values for Equipment
FTA Default ULB
(years)
Connecticut ULB
(years)
14
14
Automobile
8
5
Sport Utility Vehicle
8
5
Van
8
5
25
25
Asset Type
Rubber Tire Vehicle (Truck)
Steel Wheel Vehicle
Equipment Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 119 service vehicles, 76 for bus and 43 for rail. Table 3-8
summarizes CTDOT’s equipment inventory and its condition.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-19
Table 3-8. CTDOT Equipment Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Rubber Tire Vehicle (Truck)
Automobile
Sport Utility Vehicle
Van
Steel Wheel Vehicle
Inventory
Vehicles
below ULB
Vehicles met or
exceeded ULB
27
74%
26%
11
54%
46%
27
70%
30%
11
46%
54%
43
2%
98%
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
vehicles
Inventory data including model year (used to determine age) are stored by
vehicle in the SGR Transit Database.
Infrastructure
In 49 CFR §625.5, FTA defines infrastructure as the underlying framework or
structures that support a public transportation system. For the purposes of the
TAMP, this refers to track, power, signals/communications, and structures.
CTDOT owns both rail (New Haven Line and three branch lines) and bus
(CTfastrak) fixed guideway, along with any fixed infrastructure located along
these lines.
Rail Infrastructure
As noted earlier, the only rail segment that CTDOT owns is the NEC between
New Haven and the New York/Connecticut border, as well the New Canaan,
Danbury and Waterbury Branch Lines. Therefore the values below only include
these segments, and exclude infrastructure along Shore Line East and the
Hartford Line.
Rail Infrastructure is not just the track, but the various infrastructure along the
ROW that supports the movement of trains along the track. The infrastructure
can span from simple assemblies like Rail and Ties, to intricated systems such
as substations, grade crossings, and catenary, to multi-million structures such
as moveable bridges. MNR and CTDOT both have a Maintenance-of-Way
(MOW) unit, which refers to personnel in charge of maintaining fixed railroad
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-20
property. The assets are summarized into four main types below based on how
MNR has structured divisions within its MOW unit:
Rail Infrastructure Types
Track Elements: Track-related infrastructure;
includes running rail, ties, turnouts, and ballast.
Power: Infrastructure related to the transmission of
power for signals and traction via the overhead
contact system. Includes AC substations, catenary
plant, catenary portals, and transmission equipment.
Communication and Signals: Systems related to the
monitoring and safety of train movements. Includes
switches and signals, grade crossings, vehicle
detection equipment, Intelligent Transportation
System technology, and Positive Train Control
equipment.
Structures: Major Infrastructure to supplement safe
movement of trains above or below grade. Includes
Moveable Bridges, Fixed Bridges, Culverts, Station
Pedestrian Bridges/Tunnels, and Retaining Walls.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-21
Rail Infrastructure Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
For all rail guideway assets other than bridges and culverts, CTDOT assesses
condition based on asset age, using an approach patterned on current MNR
practices. For each asset type a ULB value is specified in years. Asset condition
is then approximated by comparing the age of the asset (years since it was
either constructed or last rehabilitated) to the ULB. A condition rating is
assigned on the five-point TERM scale based on Table 3-9.
Table 3-9. Conversion Scale: Rail Infrastructure Asset Age to FTA TERM
Condition Rating
Asset Age as % of ULB
TERM Rating
Condition
New
5
Excellent
< 50%
4
Good
>50% and <100%
3
Adequate
>100% and <125%
2
Marginal
>125%
1
Poor
Note the ULB values used here for rail infrastructure are generally consistent
with those for MNR described in the MTA Twenty Year Needs Assessment
(TYNA).
Connecticut’s ULBs for track elements are listed in Table 3-10.
Table 3-10. ULB Values for Track elements
Asset Class
Rail
Ties
Turnouts
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
ULB (years)
Tangent
40
Curves <2 degrees
30
Curves 2-4 degrees
20
Curves >4 degrees
10
Concrete
40
Wood
30
High Speed
25
Mainline
20
Yard
30
Siding
30
3-22
Connecticut’s ULBs for power are listed in Table 3-11.
Table 3-11. ULB Values for Power
Asset Class
Asset Type
Overhead Catenary
Overhead Catenary
50
AC Feeder Cable
40
Signal Power 12kV
50
Power Cable
Catenary Poles
Substations / Power
Distribution
Catenary Poles
ULB (years)
100
Substation Wayside
Switchyard
30
Anchor Bridge Substation
30
Snow Melter
Transformers/Unit Substation
30
Supply Stations
40
Substations
20
Yard Power Distribution
System
30
For structures, a detailed assessment approach has already been defined and
implemented. The FRA established Railroad Bridge Safety Standards, 49 CFR
Parts 213 and 237 that require track owners to adopt and implement a
Railroad Bridge Management Program (RBMP). CTDOT is the railroad track
owner as defined in §237.5 for the commuter operations and freight on the
NHL and numerous lines or segments of lines supporting freight and tourist
operations throughout the state. The Federal Regulations stipulate that each
railroad track owner perform inspections, prepare reports, and determine the
safe load capacity for railroad bridges in accordance with their adopted RBMP.
This RBMP is intended to be specific to structures supporting railroad track and
is complemented by the CTDOT Railroad Bridge Inspection Manual (RBIM). The
purpose of this Manual is to define the procedures and practices of the CTDOT
Office of Rail for determining the physical condition, load capacity and
maintenance needs of railroad bridges in the State of Connecticut.
CTDOT performs visual inspections of structures in the subcategories Fixed,
Moveable, Culvert, and Pedestrian. These are patterned on the approach used
for highway bridges. Through the inspection CTDOT assesses condition of the
bridge deck, superstructure and substructure condition using the 10-point
National Bridge Inventory (NBI) condition scale (with values ranging from 0 to
9) rather than the 5-point TERM scale described here. For culverts a single
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-23
overall culvert rating is specified. A bridge is deemed to be in SGR if all of its
ratings are 5 or greater and not in SGR if any rating is 4 or less.
Rail Infrastructure Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 243 track miles of passenger rail infrastructure. Tables 3-12
through 3-15 summarize CTDOT’s track, power, structures, and signals
inventory and condition.
Table 3-12. CTDOT Track Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Rail
Tie
Inventory
Rated below
3 on TERM
scale
243
50%
50%
243
69%
31%
375
72%
28%
track miles
track miles
Turnout
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
assets
Note that the asset class Power Cable includes asset types AC Feeder Cable and
Signal Power 12kV cable. The asset class Substations / Power Distribution
includes six asset types. The condition data shown in Table 3-13 is a average of
the asset types within each asset class, weighted by unit cost.
Table 3-13. CTDOT Power Inventory and Condition
Asset Class
Overhead Catenary
Power Cable
Catenary Poles
Substations / Power Distribution
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
Inventory
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
Rated below 3
on TERM scale
288
100%
0%
291
1%
99%
870
0%
100%
44
64%
36%
miles
miles
assets
assets
3-24
Table 3-14. CTDOT Structures Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Fixed
Moveable
Culvert
Pedestrian
Inventory
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
Rated below
3 on TERM
scale
148
68%
32%
5
60%
40%
36
86%
14%
17
82%
18%
assets
assets
assets
assets
For the asset category Signals, work remains to be performed to develop a full
inventory. Thus, for this category the CTDOT inventory has entries for the New
Haven Main Line, New Canaan Branch, Danbury Branch, and Waterbury
Branch.
Table 3-15. CTDOT Signals Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Main Line
New Canaan
Danbury
Waterbury
Inventory
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
Rated below
3 on TERM
scale
185
100%
0%
8
100%
0%
24
100%
0%
27
0%
100%
miles
miles
miles
miles
Bus Infrastructure
CTDOT owns the CTfastrak bus fixed guideway between New Britain and
Hartford. The guideway consists of 9.4 miles of pavement and multiple
structures.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-25
Bus Infrastructure Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
CTDOT’s approach for inventorying and assessing condition of bus fixed
guideway assets has not been implemented to date, though it will incorporate
the approach used for highway assets, for which existing systems and
approaches are well defined.
For pavement, CTDOT uses a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to measure the
condition of CTDOT-maintained pavements. PCI is calculated for each 0.1-mile
segment based on five metrics. The overall PCI is a weighted average of the
following metrics shown in Table 3-16 below.
Table 3-16. Pavement Condition Index Metrics
Metric
Weight
Description
Roughness
10%
An indicator of pavement roughness experienced by road users
traveling over the pavements. The International Roughness Index
(IRI) is computed from a single longitudinal profile
Rutting
15%
Rutting is quantified for asphalt pavements by measuring the depth
of ruts along the wheel path. Rutting is commonly caused by a
combination of high traffic volumes, heavy vehicles and the
instability of the pavement mix.
Cracking
25%
Cracks in the pavement surface can be caused or accelerated by
aging, loading, poor drainage, frost heaves or temperature changes,
or construction flaws. Cracking is measured in terms of the
percentage of cracked pavement surface.
Disintegration
30%
Disintegration is the wearing away of the pavement surface caused
by the dislodging of aggregate particles and loss of asphalt binder.
CTDOT calculates the disintegration metric using pavement age.
Drainage
20%
Drainage refers to the ability of the surface of the roadway to drain.
CTDOT uses the collected cross slope and grade of the roadway to
compute the drainage metric
The PCI is scaled from 1.0 to 9.0, with 9.0 describing a pavement without
defects. Within this scale, roadways with a PCI less than 4.0 are classified in
“Poor” condition, those between 4.0 and less than 6.0 are in “Fair” condition,
6.0 to less than 8.0 PCI indicates “Good” condition, and 8.0 to 9.0 indicates
“Excellent” condition. A pavement section for which the PCI is 6 or greater is
classified as being in a state of good repair. Implementation strategies are
referred to in chapter seven.
For structures, CTDOT uses a similar approach for rail and highway bridges. As
described previously, bridges are inspected visually. Conditions of bridge
decks, superstructures and substructures are assessed using the 10-point NBI
scale.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-26
Bus Infrastructure Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 9.4 centerline miles of bus fixed guideway and 15 bridges. As
described previously, CTDOT does not yet collect inventory and condition data
for bus guideway pavement, but will in the future. CTDOT has already
inventoried and inspected the bridges on the CTfastrak guideway and is
managing these together with other highway bridges. Table 3-17 summarizes
CTDOT’s bus guideway inventory and condition for bridges only.
Table 3-17. CTDOT Bus Guideway Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Structure
Inventory
15
bridges
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
Rated below 3
on TERM scale
100%
0%
Facilities
CTDOT categorized transit facilities into FTA’s two main classes:
administrative/ maintenance facilities, and passenger facilities. CTDOT owns a
majority of these facilities and has capital responsibility for these properties
that are operated and maintained by transit providers and other property
managers. The condition assessment approach is similar for both facility types,
and relies on visual inspection of primary facility components. However, the
specific facility components and available data differ between the two types of
facilities.
Facilities in this TAM plan are categorized by a Parent/Child Relationship of Site
and Building. There are numerous occurrences where a facility may be a single
site but have multiple buildings/structures, or have a site but no enclosed
structure, particularly for passenger rail stations. Therefore for consistency,
inventory counts for facilities are by site, but any condition assessment should
be done separately for each building/structure.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-27
Facility Types
Administrative/Maintenance: Administrative facilities are
typically offices that house management and supporting
activities for overall transit operations such as accounting,
finance, engineering, legal, safety, security, customer
services, scheduling, and planning. They also include
facilities for customer information or ticket sales, but that
are not part of any passenger station. Maintenance
facilities are those where routine maintenance and repairs
or heavy maintenance or unit rebuilds are conducted.
Passenger/Parking: Passenger facilities are significant
structures on a separate ROW. For rail modes, passenger
facilities typically mean a platform area and any associated
access structures or accessory spaces accessible to passengers
or by staff who are in support of passenger service.
Administrative / Maintenance Facilities
CTDOT owns 12 administrative/maintenance facilities for rail, bus, and ferry
services. These include CTtransit facilities in Hartford, Stamford, New Haven,
and Waterbury; CTferry facilities in Rocky Hill and Chester/Hadlyme, and rail
facilities in Bridgeport, Danbury, New Haven, Stamford, and Springdale.
Administrative/Maintenance Facility Condition Assessment and
Performance Measures
CTDOT has started to inspect facilities using an approach based on FTA’s
guidance detailed in TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook:
Condition Assessment Calculation. FTA’s guidance is intended to support
calculation of FTA’s mandated SGR performance measure for facilities, which is
the percentage of facilities within an asset class rated less than 3 on the fivepoint scale used in TERM. However, a facility with an overall condition rating of
3 or greater may still have outstanding SGR needs for certain components.
CTDOT’s approach is detailed in a Condition Assessment Guidance document.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-28
Major facility components are inspected and rated on a 1 to 5 condition scale.
The condition rating values and their descriptions are listed in Table 3-18. The
components are listed in Table 3-19.
Table 3-18. FTA TERM Condition Assessment Scale
Rating
Condition
Description
5
Excellent
No visible defects, new or near new condition, may still be under
warranty if applicable
4
Good
3
Adequate
Moderately deteriorated or defective; but has not exceeded useful life
2
Marginal
Defective or deteriorated in need of replacement; exceeded useful life
1
Poor
Critically damaged or in need of immediate repair; well past useful life
Good condition, but no longer new, may be slightly defective or
deteriorated, but is overall functional
The specific components of administrative/maintenance facilities are listed
below. Note that the first nine components listed in the table are assessed for
each building in the facility, and the final component, Site, is assessed for the
site as a whole.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-29
Table 3-19. Administrative/Maintenance Facility Components
Typical
Useful Life*
(years)
Notes
Component
Condition
Weight**
Inventory Unit
Component
Building
Substructure
30
1.0
Building
Shell
30
1.0
Building
Interior
30
1.0
Building
Plumbing
May need to assess based
on age
20
1.0
Building
HVAC
May need to assess based
on age
20
1.0
Building
Electrical
May need to assess based
on age
30
1.0
Building
Fire Protection
See Table 5 in Appendix B
20
1.0
Building
Conveyance
See Table 5 in Appendix B
20
1.0
Building
Equipment
Includes fixed specialty
equipment
30
1.0
Building
Site
50
1.0
*Useful life can be utilized for components that cannot be visually inspected.
**Component Condition Weight represents the relative importance of the component compared to
other components. By default, these numbers are 1.0. However, based on the agency’s experiences and
practices, the inspector can use a different number to lower or raise the importance of a component
and thus change how component conditions impact the overall facility condition.
For some components, a visual inspection may be insufficient for establishing
conditions. In these cases, an age-based approach is used to estimate
condition using useful life for the component listed in Table 3-19 with the
conversion scale shown in Table 3-20. Useful life is the average amount of time
in years that an item, component, or system is economically efficient to keep
in operation.
Table 3-20. Conversion Scale: Asset Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating
Asset Age as % of ULB
TERM Rating
Condition
New
5
Excellent
< 50%
4
Good
>50% and <100%
3
Adequate
>100% and <125%
2
Marginal
>125%
1
Poor
*Useful life can be utilized for components that cannot be visually inspected.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-30
For Fire Protection and Conveyance, separate inspections are typically
performed to assess code compliance. CTDOT uses the results from those
inspections in performing their condition assessment, applying the condition
assessment scale shown in Table 3-21 for these components.
Table 3-21. Fire Protection and Conveyance Condition Assessment Scale
Rating
Condition
Description
5
Excellent
System is new and there are no identified code issues
4
Good
3
Adequate
2
Marginal
1
Poor
System is not new, but there are no identified code issues
Isolated code issues exist that can be addressed through maintenance
Code issues exist that do not necessitate facility closure
Extensive code issues have been identified that may necessitate facility
closure
Given the individual component conditions, the overall condition of the facility
is calculated as:
!"#$%&%"# =
∑.+/0 *+ ,+ -+
∑.+/0 ,+ -+
where ci is the condition of component i, fi is the weight factor listed in Table 319, and ri is the replacement cost of the component.
Administrative/Maintenance Facility Inventory and Condition
Of the 12 admin/maintenance facilities owned by CTDOT, only 9 require
condition assessments, as the 3 ferry facilities are excluded from FTA TAMP
reporting requirements. Of these 9 facilities, only the CTtransit Hartford facility
has had a recent detailed inspection and condition assessment. The remaining
administrative/maintenance facilities were determined to be above a three on
the TERM scale based on Engineering Judgements. Table 3-22 summarizes
CTDOT’s administrative/maintenance facility inventory and condition.
Table 3-22. CTDOT Administrative/Maintenance Facility Inventory and
Condition
Asset Type
Administrative /Maintenance Facility
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
Inventory
9
facilities
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
100%
Rated below
3 on TERM
scale
0%
3-31
Passenger Facilities
CTDOT owns 53 passenger facilities for bus rapid transit and commuter rail
services, including 10 CTfastrak passenger facilities and 43 rail passenger
facilities.
Passenger Facility Condition Assessment and Performance Measures
The condition assessment approach for passenger facilities is similar to that for
administrative/maintenance facilities. The approach described here is based
on FTA’s guidance detailed in TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting
Guidebook: Condition Assessment Calculation. FTA’s guidance is intended to
support calculation of FTA’s mandated SGR performance measure for facilities,
which is the percentage of facilities within an asset class rated less than 3 on
the five-point TERM scale. However, a facility with an overall condition rating
of 3 or greater may still have outstanding SGR needs for certain components.
Major facility components are inspected and rated on a 1 to 5 condition scale.
The condition rating values and their descriptions are listed in Table 3-18. The
components are listed in Table 3-23.
Regarding the specific components of passenger facilities, note that first nine
listed in the table below are assessed for each building in the facility. Three
components are assessed for each platform, and Site is assessed for the site as
a whole.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-32
Table 3-23. Passenger Facility Components
Notes
Typical
Useful Life*
(years)
Component
Condition
Weight**
Inventory Unit
Component
Building
Substructure
30
1.0
Building
Shell
30
1.0
Building
Interior
30
1.0
Building
Plumbing
May need to assess based
on age
20
1.0
Building
HVAC
May need to assess based
on age
20
1.0
Building
Electrical
May need to assess based
on age
30
1.0
Building
Fire Protection
See Table 6 in Appendix B
20
1.0
Building
Conveyance
See Table 6 in Appendix B
20
1.0
Building
Fare Collection
20
1.0
Platform
Structure
30
1.0
Platform
Canopy
30
1.0
Platform
Electrical
30
1.0
Site
Site
50
1.0
*Useful life can be utilized for components that cannot be visually inspected.
**Component Condition Weight represents the relative importance of the component compared to
other components. By default, these numbers are 1.0. However, based on the agency’s experiences and
practices, the inspector can use a different number to lower or raise the importance of a component
and thus change how component conditions impact the overall facility condition.
The other details of the assessment process are identical to that described
previously for administrative/maintenance facilities. Table 3-20 lists rating
values to use if CTDOT uses age as a proxy for condition. Table 3-21 lists
specific condition assessment language to use for fire protection and
conveyance. Given the individual component conditions, the overall condition
of the facility is calculated as:
!"#$%&%"# =
∑.+/0 *+ ,+ -+
∑.+/0 ,+ -+
where ci is the condition of component i, fi is the weight factor listed in Table 323, and ri is the replacement cost of the component.
Recent rail passenger facility inspections conducted by CTDOT contained
sufficient information to meet FTA requirements for conducting facility
condition assessment, as well as defining condition states that were converted
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-33
to FTA’s TERM 1-5 Scale for NTD reporting. The inspections were performed
for different facility components using a 10-point scale similar to the NBI
condition scale (with values ranging from 0 to 9). NBI conditions were
converted to the TERM scale by dividing the rating by 2 and then rounding to
the nearest integer value. Thus, a component was deemed to have a TERM
rating of 2 if its NBI rating was 5 (fair) or less. The conversion scale is show in
Table 3-24.
Table 3-24. Conversion Scale: NBI to TERM
NBI Scale
9
TERM Rating
Condition
5
Excellent
4
Good
3
Adequate
2
Marginal
1
Poor
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
The rail facility inspections were mapped to component conditions as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The condition for Substructure was established based on the value for
Foundations.
The condition for Shell was established based on the minimum of Roof
and Exterior Walls.
The condition for Interior was established based on the minimum of
Interior Walls, Floors, Windows/Skylights/Doors, Stairs/Ramps and
Walking Surfaces.
The condition for Plumbing was established based on the minimum of
the two ratings for Drainage and the rating for Restrooms.
The condition for HVAC was established based on the minimum of
HVAC, Duct Work, Compressors, and Blowers.
The condition for Conveyance was established based on the minimum
of Elevator Pit, Elevator Machine Room, Elevator Cab, and Escalator.
The condition for Site was established based on the value for SiteElectrical.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-34
For rail platforms, the condition was determined for the components
Structure, Canopy and Electrical. For each of these the condition was
determined by taking the minimum of the subcomponent ratings.
The station data included information on station bridges, but this was
considered to be part of the data set of Fixed Guideway – Structures.
Passenger Facility Inventory and Condition
CTDOT owns 53 passenger facilities. Passenger facility assessments and score
conversions were only available for rail stations. CTfastrak stations were
determined to be above a three on the TERM scale based on Engineering
Judgements. Table 3-25 summarizes CTDOT’s passenger facility inventory and
condition.
Table 3-25. CTDOT Passenger Facility Inventory and Condition
Asset Type
Passenger Facility (Commuter Rail)
Passenger Facility (Bus Rapid Transit)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
Rated 3 or
above on
TERM scale
Rated below
3 on TERM
scale
43
42%
58%
10
100%
0%
Inventory
facilities
facilities
3-35
FTA Performance Measures
As mentioned throughout this chapter, FTA has established SGR performance
measures for the four capital asset categories required for the PT-TAMP. Transit
providers must set one-year performance targets for each applicable performance
measure. These targets must be updated and submitted on the A90 form of the
Asset Inventory Module (AIM) module to the NTD annually. The NTD AIM is
designed to collect basic information on assets and infrastructure used by U.S.
transit agencies to deliver service. Beginning in Report Year (RY) 2018, agencies
that receive or benefit from Chapter 53 funds from FTA are required to report
asset inventory, condition and performance information to the NTD. For rolling
stock and equipment, CTDOT uses FTA performance measures to track asset
condition. Targets in Connecticut are set using the following business practice
process adopted by CTDOT:
Target (%) = # of years to procure asset / (ULB + years of procurement)
For example, a bus asset with a procurement time of two years and a ULB of 12
years would have a 14% target.
For infrastructure, the FTA performance measure required for NTD reporting is
different from CTDOT’s measure to track asset condition. The FTA has
prescribed that operators submit to NTD a performance measure that
measures a percentage of track that is under a speed restriction, a terminology
that is tied to the issuance of slow zones. Slow zones are orders put out by a
rail provider to inform train operators that a segment of track should be
traversed at a slower speed than normal or avoided altogether due to weather,
maintenance, or defect. In this case, FTA has requested the collection of all
slow zone data with the exception of blanket slow zones (usually weatherrelated).
CTDOT collected this data from MNR, which submits daily slow zone bulletins
to the department to inform of track outages. The FTA requires transit
providers to only collect data for the first Wednesday of every month at 9:00
AM, as a method of keeping data collection simple and representative of day
to day. Each month when data is received, CTDOT would track the total track
miles under performance restriction. Once 12 months of data are collected,
these numbers should be averaged to determine number of track miles on
average that are under a restriction, and then divide by the total number of
track miles on the system to get a % for the year. See Appendix E for Slow Zone
calculations for Report Year 2018.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-36
This percentage would be reported to the NTD calculated as shown below:
05
1 = (3 4+ )/12
+/0
T = Total Track Miles under restriction for month i
I = Month
V = Guideway Performance Metric (Average Track Miles Under Restriction per
Month)
1
: = ; = ∗ 100
<
S = Total Track Miles on System
G = Guideway Performance Measure (%)
For facilities, CTDOT uses the FTA performance measure required for NTD
reporting. CTDOT’s condition assessment approach was developed to meet the
FTA requirements and deliver condition data for calculating the performance
measure. FTA requires facilities to be inspected at least every 4 years, but
initially only requires 25% of all facilities to be inspected and reported each
year. Please refer to Appendix D to show which facilities have been formally
inspected and those facilities still outstanding. A summary of the FTA
performance measures and CTDOT’s targets is provided in Tables 3-26 through
3-29.
Table 3-26. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Rolling Stock
Performance Measure
Percentage of vehicles that
have met or exceed their ULB
Asset Class
Performance
SFY 18
Target
SFY 19
Transit Bus
19%
14%
Articulated Bus
0%
14%
Cutaway Bus
0%
17%
Over-the-Road Bus
3%
14%
Commuter Rail Locomotive
(MNR)
55%
13%
Commuter Rail Locomotive
(SLE/HL)
100%
17%
Commuter Rail Passenger
Coach (MNR)
0%
13%
Commuter Rail Passenger
Coach (SLE/HL)
100%
17%
12%
13%
100%
0%
Commuter Rail Self-Propelled
Passenger Car
Ferry Boat
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-37
Table 3-27. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Equipment
Performance Measure
Performance
SFY 18
Target
SFY 19
Truck
26%
7%
Automobile
46%
17%
30%
17%
55%
17%
98%
0%
Performance
SFY 18
Target
SFY 19
5%
2%
Performance
SFY 18
Target
SFY 19
0%
0%
58%
0%
Asset Class
Percentage of equipment that
Sport Utility Vehicle
have met or exceed their ULB
Van
Steel Wheel Vehicle
Table 3-28. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Infrastructure
Performance Measure
Asset Class
Percentage of track segments
Rail Guideway
with performance restrictions
The passenger facilities reported below consist of 43 rail passenger facilities.
The 10 CTfastrak facilities owned by CTDOT are not required to be reported to
NTD and thus are not included in the performance measure calculation.
Table 3-29. FTA Performance Measures and Targets for Facilities
Performance Measure
Asset Class
Administrative/Maintenance
Percentage of facilities within
an asset class, rated below
condition 3 on the TERM scale Passenger
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Inventory and Condition
3-38
CHAPTER 4
Analytical
Approach
Asset management involves operating, maintaining,
and improving assets using analysis to identify a
sequence of actions that will achieve a State of
Good Repair over the life cycle of the assets. Thus,
asset management concepts apply over the full life
of an asset, spanning from installation or
construction of an asset to its replacement or
retirement. As part of asset management practice,
CTDOT makes investment decisions that consider
not only the current condition, but also the full life
cycle and associated costs of assets. Analytical
processes and decision support tools help support
CTDOT’s investment decisions and develop a
prioritized list of needs.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
This chapter describes CTDOT’s analytical approach for its transit assets.
CTDOT’s approach for analyzing transit investment needs relies on two
systems. First, the asset data described in chapter three are stored in a
single, integrated database, the SGR Transit Database. Also, to perform the
analysis and prioritization of SGR needs, CTDOT is using a customized
version of the Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (TAPT) developed through
the Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) and included with TCRP
Report 172.
Deterioration models and costs used with the tool are based on
Connecticut data (where available), or alternatively on the TAPT defaults
from the FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM). TERM is a
decision tool that helps transit agencies with assessing and prioritizing SGR
needs given funding constraints. The TERM scale is a rating system to
define levels of condition for use in deterioration curves to determine the
remaining life of assets.
Federal Legislative Context
In 49 CFR 625.25, FTA requires that a TAM plan include a “description of
analytical processes or decision-support tools that a provider uses to
estimate capital investment needs over time and develop its investment
prioritization.”
SGR Transit Database
The SGR Transit Database is a relational database that integrates the asset
condition inventory and condition data used to develop this plan. The
database is a MySQL database deployed on the Amazon Relational
Database Service. Pending development of customized forms, CTDOT and
contractor staff access the database using commercial off the shelf (COTS)
database clients, such as MySQLWorkbench. Figure 4-1 shows the database
schema.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-2
Figure 4-1. SGR Transit Database Schema
The database is structured to store data on any asset, with the ability to
add asset types and attributes without changing the underlying database
structure. Also, the database supports specification of parent-child
relationships, so that complex asset hierarchies can be specified if needed.
For instance, for facilities a record is stored for each individual facility, as
well as for each building on the facility site.
In the database the list of assets is stored in the table asset_type lists the
specific types of assets stored in the database. The table asset_attribute
specifies the specific attributes that may be defined for an asset. These
attributes vary by asset type. The list of assets is stored in the table
asset_inventory. This table provides a description of each asset, identifies
the asset type, and specify the organization responsible for operating the
asset. The attribute values for each asset are stored in the table
asset_attribute_value. This table has one record for each attribute of each
asset. Additional tables specify organizations that may own, operate or
maintain assets, as well as which organizations own and operate the
various assets.
Asset types currently stored in the database correspond to those identified
in chapter three. Note that in the case of revenue vehicles the database
stores data by vehicle fleet, though the database structure supports
specification of individual vehicles as well. The attributes stored for each
asset necessarily vary by asset type, and include those required to identify
the asset and support use of TAPT for modeling investment needs as
described in the following section. For instance, for buildings the database
stores data on the construction date of the facility, the construction cost,
floor area, and the condition of the building components listed in chapter
three. However, CTDOT and individual transit operators have significant
additional information on buildings used for day-to-day management
stored in other systems.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-3
Data are exported for use in TAPT using a set of custom views defined by
asset type. These views are accessed through MySQLWorkbench or other
database clients. Also, project team members exported the views to
spreadsheet form to facilitate review and verification of the data.
Analytical Tool
As noted above, CTDOT used TAPT to support its analytical approach. TAPT
is a spreadsheet tool for predicting transit asset conditions and SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models for different asset types that recommend
when to rehabilitate or replace an asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the asset over time. Also, the tool supports
prediction of the overall performance resulting for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a prioritized list of projects to fund given a
budget constraint.
Figure 4-2 is a diagram illustrating the structure of TAPT. As shown in the
figure, the tool has a single start screen that supports navigation,
generation of new models, and performing an analysis. The tool has
templates for vehicle models, age-based-models, and condition-based
models. TAPT also includes a single worksheet for entry of major
parameters and budgets, as well as worksheets for viewing summary and
detailed outputs of an analysis. The tool creates new worksheets with
summary outputs and detailed outputs (the program list) for each analysis
a user performs.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-4
Figure 4-2. TAPT User Interface Organization
Figure 4-3 illustrates the start screen of the tool, which provides the tool
user the ability to create a new asset model, edit an existing model, run the
prioritization model (which uses the asset models), and/or view results.
Figure 4-4 illustrates the specification of an asset model. In this case, a
condition-based model is shown. The user specifies the quantity and
condition of each asset of a specified type, a transition probability matrix
that describes how the asset will deteriorate (or improve in the event an
action is performed) and additional cost data (not shown in this
screenshot).
The outputs generated using TAPT include lifecycle models for each asset
type, a recommended policy specifying the point at which the asset should
be rehabilitated or replaced, and predictions of future conditions as an
asset continues to age. The prioritization model uses the asset-specific
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-5
results to predict future conditions and recommend work given a particular
budget. Alternatively, one can enter a specific set of asset
rehabilitation/replacement actions (“pipelined” projects) and view the
predicted conditions and performance over time without using the
prioritization model to determine when these actions will be implemented.
Figure 4-3. TAPT Start Screen
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-6
Figure 4-4. TAPT Model Example
The TAPT modeling approach incorporates the three different asset-level
models noted above, as well as a prioritization model that integrates the
asset-level models and simulates the allocation of resources to address SGR
needs over time and across asset types. Below is a brief description of each
of these:
•
Vehicle Model: the revenue vehicle model takes as input data
items reported by urban transit agencies to the NTD specified for a
given fleet of vehicles, such as vehicle mileage, revenue passenger
miles, maintenance costs, energy consumption and mechanical
failures. The model then predicts agency, user and external costs,
and mean distance between failures (MDBF) as a function of
vehicle mileage. Further, it calculates the mileage at which a given
vehicle should be replaced to minimize lifecycle costs, and the
increased lifecycle costs that will result each year a needed
replacement is deferred. The model includes default assumptions
for growth in maintenance costs, rehabilitation costs and failures
that are calibrated based on model inputs. Alternatively, one may
override the default assumptions.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-7
•
•
•
Condition-Based Model: this model, which is technically a
Markovian Decision Model, may be used to model any asset. It
predicts the lifecycle agency, user and external costs associated
with an asset, as well as the optimal point to perform rehabilitation
or replacement, and the increase in lifecycle costs of deferring
action. An asset is modeled as existing in one of a number of
different condition states (in this case, using the five-point
condition scale from TERM), and a set of transition probabilities
describes the likelihood of transition from a given state to another
given either the asset deteriorates or some action is taken. The
model determines the optimal policy, or set of actions to take as a
function of condition, to minimize agency, user and external costs.
Further, the model explicitly calculates the cost of deferring a
recommended action in terms of the increased lifecycle cost
resulting from action deferral. Model defaults are provided for
each asset type defined in TERM using TERM data.
Age-Based Model: like the condition-based model, this is a generic
model that can be used to model any asset. However, the
condition-based model is recommended over this model where
condition data are available. In the age-based model, asset
rehabilitation or replacement is motivated by the gradually
increasing cost of asset maintenance, as well as increasing
likelihood of asset failure. This likelihood is modeled using a
Weibull distribution. Using the model requires data on asset age,
and the model outputs are essentially the same as those produced
using the condition-based model.
Prioritization Model: in TAPT asset rehabilitation/replacement is
prioritized with an objective of minimizing lifecycle agency, user
and external costs subject to a budget constraint. To accomplish
this objective, the model establishes candidate
rehabilitation/replacement actions, and calculates the costs and
impacts of these using the asset-level models. The model then
prioritizes potential investments in decreasing order of
Prioritization Index (PI), where the PI is defined as the change in
lifecycle cost resulting from delaying an action one year relative
performing it in the specified year divided by the action cost. In
concept the PI is a benefit cost ratio. However, one may tailor the
prioritization function to change the weight of different types of
benefits and/or specify an additional benefit realized from
replacing an asset over and above that modeled by the asset-level
models.
See TCRP Report 172 for a detailed description of TAPT, guidance on how to
use the spreadsheet tool, and two tutorials using example data.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-8
Implementing the Tool at CTDOT
This section provides additional details on the revisions made to support
CTDOT’s use of TAPT. The revisions include creating new screens for
refining inventory data and changing underlying code in TAPT to relax some
of the tool’s constraints.
Screens for Editing Inventory Data
A major change to TAPT is the addition of two new screens to the system,
including screens for importing vehicle data and facility data from the SGR
Transit Database and/or other systems. With this functionality the tool user
can quickly enter data on a set of vehicle fleets and facilities.
Figure 4-5 illustrates the start screen for the CTDOT version of TAPT
providing access to the new screens. Relative to the default, this version of
the tool includes a new section labeled “Asset Inventory” for two new
buttons providing access to the new screens. Figure 4-6 shows a section of
the vehicle inventory screen. This screen has one row for each fleet
exported from the SGR Transit Database. A fleet is a subgroup of vehicles
that are operated by the same transit provider and have the same
manufacturer, model, and model year. The user can edit the following
fields for each fleet, either using imported data or overriding it as
appropriate:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fleet ID. This is formed by concatenating the agency name and a
sequence number, both of which can be edited.
Vehicle description. This is formed from SGR Transit Database data
by concatenating the model year, manufacturer and model.
Vehicle Useful Life (miles). The ULB for the fleet in miles, if defined
(by default this is not used).
Vehicle Useful Life (years). The ULB for the fleet in year. This is
defined by CTDOT by vehicle type.
Vehicle type. This field specifies which specific vehicle model to
use of the types defined in CTDOT’s asset hierarchy.
Model year. This is formed from SGR Transit Database data and
used to calculate vehicle age.
Total current miles/hours. This is an optional field and is not
populated by default. If populated it is used to calculate an
effective age for the fleet.
Number of vehicles. This is the number of vehicles in a fleet and is
formed from SGR Transit Database data.
Condition. The condition of the fleet, measured using the 1-5
TERM scale. This is an optional field and is not populated by
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-9
•
•
•
•
default. If populated it is used to calculate an effective age for the
fleet.
Vehicle age. This is calculated based on model year or date vehicle
is placed into service. Vehicle condition is provided to assist in
evaluating effective age.
Project code. This is an optional field that can be used to identify a
known project.
Pipeline year. This is an optional field that can be used to identify a
specific year when the vehicle will be replaced.
Indicator of whether or not to include the vehicle in the
modeling. Vehicles may be excluded if data are incomplete, or if
the vehicle is modeled through a separately-defined asset group
model.
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
DOT Version 1.3 - 4/5/18
Start Screen
ASSET INVENTORY
Opens worksheets to edit vehicle and facility data. Each asset in the vehicle and
facility inventories is modeled using an existing asset group model. Create new
asset groups to model other asset types not captured in these group models.
Edit Vehicle Inventory
Edit Facility Inventory
MODEL PARAMETERS
ASSET GROUP ADMINISTRATION
Opens worksheet to enter or edit information for
a new asset group. You will be asked for an
Asset Group ID Code and model type (vehicle,
age-based, or condition-based).
SUMMARY STATISTICS
Create Asset Group
Edit Asset Group
Delete Asset Group
BUDGETS AND PARAMETERS INPUT
Opens worksheet to input budget amounts for
each year and review (and, if desired, override)
default economic analysis parameters.
Budgets & Parameters
ASSET REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
Displays a listing of the asset replacement
program from a prioritization model run. You will
be asked to select the Run ID Code.
INITIAL CONDITIONS
Replacement Value ($ 000)
Initial Needs ($ 000)
Avg. Age (years)
Mean Distance Between Failures (miles)
Avg. Condition
CO2 Emissions (tons)
Run Prioritization Model
Display Summary Table
Value Needs Vehicle
56%
46%56%
44%
54%
516,309
151,956
4.4
1,459
3.6
76,078
Initial Needs
Vehicle
Non-Vehicle
Non-Vehicle
Repl
44%
Delete Previous Run
PRIORITIZATION MODEL RESULTS
Displays a summary table showing prioritization
model results by year for a selected run. You will
be asked to select a
Run ID Code.
12
14
26
Replacement Value
Graph Data
PRIORITIZATION MODEL
PRIORITIZATION MODEL ADMINISTRATION
Runs the prioritization model using current
budgets, parameters, and asset groups. You will
be asked to specify a Run ID Code.
ASSET GROUPS
Vehicle
Non-Vehicle
Total
Vehicle
46%
Non-Vehicle
54%
CHARTS
ONE AND TWO RUN CHARTS
Displays a chart showing prioritization model
results by year for one model run or two. You will
be asked to select a Run ID Code(s) and the
output variable to be charted.
Display Chart - One Run
Display Chart - Two Runs
Display Program List
Figure 4-5. CTDOT TAPT Start Screen
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-10
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Vehicle Inventory
ID
Model
Total Current
Life (years) Vehicle Type
Over-the-Road Bus
Year
2010
Miles/Hours
2015 MCI
Over-the-Road Bus
2015
2
1
2
2011 Nova
2014 Nova/Fastrak
Articulated Bus
Articulated Bus
2011
2014
10
12
7
4
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
3
4
2005 New Flyer
2007 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2005
2007
48
64
13
11
CTTransit Hartford
5
2008 New Flyer
Transit Bus
2008
2
10
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
6
7
2012 New Flyer
2014 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2012
2014
3
9
6
4
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
8
9
2014 New Flyer
2015 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2014
2015
18
3
4
3
CTTransit Hartford
10
2017 New Flyer
Transit Bus
2017
26
1
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
11
12
2017 New Flyer
2017 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2017
2017
78
5
1
1
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
13
14
2010 MCI
2017 MCI D4500
Over-the-Road Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
2010
2017
2
19
8
1
Agency
Collins
Default
1
Collins
2
CTTransit Hartford
CTTransit Hartford
Vehicle Useful
Override Description
2010 MCI
Life (miles)
Vehicle Useful
Num.
Vehicles Condition
5
Age
Model Year
8
3
Figure 4-6. CTDOT TAPT Vehicle Inventory
The facility inventory is similar in concept to the vehicle inventory. For each
facility defined, the screen allows specification of the following items:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Facility ID. This is formed by concatenating the agency name,
facility description and a sequence number, all of which can be
edited.
Condition. This is specified for ten facility systems – substructure,
shell, interior, conveyance, plumbing, HVAC, fire protection,
electrical, equipment, and site.
Construction year. This field is used to calculate facility age.
Quantity. This must be specified separately by system, and is
typically either the roof area, floor area, or site area.
Project code. This is an optional field that can be used to identify a
known project.
Pipeline year. This is an optional field that can be used to identify a
specific year when the facility will be replaced/rehabilitated.
Indicator of whether or not to include the facility in the modeling.
Facilities may be excluded if data are incomplete, or if the vehicle is
modeled through a separately-defined asset group model.
Note that each facility is modeled as a set of ten assets in TAPT, with one
asset defined for each of the ten facility systems listed above.
Other TAPT Revisions
Several further revisions were made in TAPT to relax certain constraints in
the tool. Specific changes made in this regard include the following:
•
The tool was revised to allow modeling of assets listed on the new
inventory pages without providing the same level of detail required
for developing asset group models. For these assets it is necessary
to specify certain basic data outlined above, including specification
of what asset group model should be used. Preexisting TAPT
functionality is used to develop the asset group models. By default,
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-11
•
•
TAPT is constrained to model only those assets listed in the group
model pages.
The handling of assets excluded from prioritization runs was
revised. The preexisting version of the tool allowed for specifying
that assets used for building an asset group model should be
excluded from prioritization. However, if this option was used both
the asset and the model were excluded; in other words, selecting
this option was equivalent to deleting the model entirely. For
CTDOT, it is desirable to define asset group models, and then use
the models without including the specific assets included in
developing the model (as they may already be included in the data
imported from the SGR Transit Database). The tool was revised to
support this approach.
The tool was revised to model up to 5,000 assets, including 3,000
assets listed on the vehicle inventory pages, 1,000 assets listed on
the facility inventory page (10 systems for each of 100 facilities),
and 1,000 other assets that may be defined as part of the asset
group models. The preexisting version of the tool was constrained
to model only 1,000 assets. Likewise, the page size was increased
for display of model results considering the increase in number of
assets.
Modeling Assumptions for Connecticut Transit Assets
This section describes key modeling assumptions and parameters by asset
type.
Buses. For buses prototype models were developed for the bus types
identified in chapter three using the TAPT vehicle model. These models
were then calibrated such that replacement is recommended at the ULB
value specified for CTDOT. Vehicle replacement costs were established
through review of CTDOT data on recent bus purchases, adjusting historic
costs to 2017 costs using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Rail Vehicles. As in the case prototype models were developed for the bus
types identified in chapter three using the TAPT vehicle model. These
models were then calibrated such that replacement is recommended at the
ULB value specified for CTDOT. The default values for vehicle replacement
were based on those in TAPT (which are in turn based on those in TERM),
adjusted for inflation using the CPI.
Facilities. The TAPT condition-based model was used to define models for
each of the major facility components defined in chapter three. In the tool
assets were created for each facility component of each building. Platforms
were treated as an additional facility component. TAPT defaults (which are
in turn derived from those in TERM) were used to predict deterioration
rates for each facility component.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-12
Regarding facility costs, the average cost per square foot was determined
for passenger buildings and administrative/maintenance facilities by
averaging inflation-adjusted historic construction costs. CTDOT staff
estimated the percentage of the overall facility cost attributed to each
facility component.
For platforms a single cost per platform was calculated by averaging the
inflation-adjusted historic costs. Overall facility conditions were predicted
by calculating a weighted average condition, with each component
weighted based on its replacement value.
Bridges. The TAPT condition-based model was used to develop a model for
bridges. TAPT defaults were used for deterioration. CTDOT staff calculated
an average cost per bridge for culverts and pedestrian structures, moveable
bridges, and fixed bridges.
Track. TAPT condition-based models were developed for tangent track,
curved track, wood ties, concrete ties, turnouts, and guideway surfacing.
Deterioration models for each of these asset types were developed to
match MNR definitions of each condition and MNR estimates of useful life.
For instance, for tangent track MNR estimates a useful life of 40 years. The
deterioration probabilities for tangent track were specified such that the
median years to reach a value of 2 on the TERM scale (100% of the useful
life) is 40 years, and the median years to reach a value of 1 on the TERM
scale (125% of the useful life) is 50 years. Costs for the track models were
based on the 2017 Railroad Engineering and Construction Cost Benchmarks
published by Compass International Inc.
Power. TAPT condition-based models were developed for the power assets
described in chapter three, grouping these were the same units of measure
were used for multiple subtypes. This resulted in models for Catenary Wire,
Catenary Insulators and Pulleys, Cable, Catenary Poles, Substations, and
Other Power Components. Deterioration models for each of these asset
types were developed to match MNR definitions of each condition and
MNR estimates of useful life. TAPT defaults (based on those in TERM) were
used for estimating costs.
Signals. A TAPT age-based model was established for signals using TAPT
defaults for deterioration. A single asset was defined for the overall signal
system for each rail line (the NEC mainline and the three branch lines). The
cost per track mile was determined based on the estimated cost for
replacing the signal system on the Waterbury Branch.
Service Vehicles. TAPT age-based models were developed for the different
types of service vehicles defined in chapter three. TAPT defaults were used,
calibrating these to CTDOT’s established ULB values. Vehicle replacement
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-13
costs were established through review of CTDOT data on recent service
vehicle purchase, adjusting historic costs to 2017 costs using the CPI.
Business Processes to Support the Tool
Although the use of TAPT is an important element of the development of
the PT-TAMP, in reality its use is just one of a number of steps in the
decision-making process for capital planning. The business process for
performing the analysis of SGR needs and using this to develop the capital
plan is as follows:
•
First, TAPT is populated with available data on the asset inventory,
its condition, treatments costs, and other data.
•
Next, projects that are in progress or planned in the near term are
entered in TAPT as “pipelined” projects. This forces the system to
rehabilitate or replace these assets in the specified year.
•
Next, separate runs are performed in TAPT for buses and rail
assets. This generates a set of predicted conditions at different
budget levels, as well as a prioritized list of SGR investments
recommended in each year.
•
The initial model results are reviewed to identify issues in the data,
such as incorrectly coded ages, cases where there are additional
known investments that need to be pipelined, and/or other issues.
•
TAPT is then rerun, generating a new set of results and priorities.
•
CTDOT next revises its capital plan using data from TAPT to help
inform its decision-making. However, the work that is actually
planned may differ significantly from that recommended by TAPT
for a variety of reasons. These include:
o
Bundling of related needs differently than that modeled by
the system. For instance, if work on a facility is performed,
then all work needed would generally be performed given
the costs associated with initiating a project. TAPT might
recommend work on one facility system one year, to be
followed by work on another system in a subsequent
project.
o
Differences in costs. TAPT is populated with average unit
costs, but the costs for a given project may be greater or
less than the average.
o
Need for geographical equity. TAPT does not consider the
need to balance investments between different areas or
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-14
regions, but this is an important factor in “real world”
decisions.
•
o
Limitations in uses of funding. TAPT models a budget as a
single fund that can be used without limitation for any
project. In reality CTDOT derives funding from multiple
sources and there are various stipulations on the use of
those funds that must be considered in developing the
capital plan. For instance, some funds may be available
only for certain asset types, or certain types of work.
o
CTDOT staff incorporate many additional factors and
perspectives in prioritizing needs beyond those captured
in any model.
Once the capital plan is revised, the prioritized list of needs
generated by TAPT is revised based on actual project plans.
The end result of the above process is a capital plan that reflects available
funding and incorporates TAPT priorities to the extent feasible. The
process also yields a prioritized list of SGR needs that helps inform decisions
concerning where additional and/or future investment should be directed.
The final list of prioritized needs included in this PT-TAMP is a product of
the staff judgement, TAPT analysis, and institutional experience.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Analytical Approach
4-15
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
CHAPTER 5
Investment
Scenarios
Developing investment scenarios at various funding
levels enables CTDOT to evaluate funding priorities.
The investment scenarios show projected needs and
work across the four asset categories in the plan.
While CTDOT is making progress towards
performance targets at current funding levels, the
investment scenarios demonstrate a need for
additional funding to achieve SGR.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
This chapter describes the estimated funding available for transit at CTDOT,
the estimated uses for that funding, projected asset investment needs, and
projected capital projects based on funding scenarios. Funding for transit in
Connecticut comes from a mix of federal and state sources. As described in
chapter four, CTDOT uses TAPT to model asset conditions and predict
investments needed to achieve and maintain SGR.
Federal Legislative Context
In 49 CFR 625.25, FTA requires than a TAM plan include a “provider’s projectbased prioritization of investments.” The investment prioritization must “take
into consideration its estimation of funding levels from all available sources
that it reasonably expects will be available in each fiscal year during the TAM
plan horizon period.”
Funding for Transit at CTDOT
Funding for transit in Connecticut historically comes primarily from FTA funds,
with the remainder coming from state public transportation bonds.
Connecticut public transportation bond funds are used to match federal funds
and provide funding for 100% state projects. Within the State Public
Transportation Bonds, the bond funds are divided into state match for federal
and projects with 100% State Funding.
Recently, the State of Connecticut implemented Let’s Go CT, a program which
in part provides an influx of transit funds and accounts for a large percentage
of transit funding in the short term. Transit funding sources at CTDOT and the
bonding process are discussed in detail in CTDOT’s Annual Capital Plan Report.
Estimated funding sources for transit over the four-year period of the PTTAMP, organized by source, are shown in Table 5-1.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-2
Table 5-1. Summary of Estimated Funding for Transit
Value by Fiscal Year ($M) in 2018 dollars
Description
2018
2019
2020
2021
Federal Funds
$193
$192
$195
$195
FTA Funds
$188
$192
$195
$195
$5
$0
$0
$0
$236
$246
$236
$236
$15
$438
$527
$330
$15
$438
$527
$0
$0
$0
$0
$330
$445
$876
$958
$761
FTA Special Funds/Earmarks/New Starts
State Funds (Bonds Authorized)*
Let’s GO CT
Let’s Go CT Ramp-Up (Bonds
Authorized)**
Additional State Funds Required to
Sustain Program
Total Funding
*Combination of State Federal Match and 100% State Bonded Projects. Authorized only through 2019
in Accordance with the approved biennial Budget
**Authorized but not appropriated through 2020
Federal funds for transit come from a number of FTA grant programs,
including:
•
Section 5305 – Planning Programs
-
5305(d) Metropolitan Planning
5305(e) State Planning and Research
•
Section 5307 – Urbanized Area Formula Funding
•
Section 5310 - Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & People with Disabilities
•
Section 5311 – Formula Grants for Rural Areas
-
SEC 5311(b)(3) Rural Transportation Assistance Program
•
Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Grants Program
•
Section 5339 - Bus & Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment Program
The program section titles correspond to the sections of the US Code in which
each program is defined. A breakdown of estimated federal funding by FTA
program is shown in Table 5-2.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-3
Table 5-2. Summary of Estimated Connecticut Share of FTA Programs
Value by Fiscal Year ($) in 2018 dollars
Description
2018
2019
2020
2021
SEC 5305(d)
$1,164,020
$1,186,835
$1,207,011
$1,207,011
SEC 5305(e)
$303,924
$309,881
$315,149
$315,149
$104,585,517
$106,635,393
$108,448,195
$108,448,195
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,424,030
$2,471,541
$2,513,557
$2,513,557
$102,161,487
$104,163,852
$105,934,638
$105,934,638
SEC 5310
$4,240,338
$4,323,449
$4,396,947
$4,396,947
SEC 5311
$3,119,678
$3,180,824
$3,234,898
$3,234,898
$111,390
$113,573
$115,504
$115,504
$69,134,272
$70,489,304
$71,687,622
$71,687,622
$365,136
$372,293
$378,622
$378,622
$68,769,136
$70,117,011
$71,309,000
$71,309,000
$1,262,945
$1,287,699
$1,309,590
$1,309,590
$1,262,945
$1,287,699
$1,309,590
$1,309,590
SEC 5339
$4,514,968
$4,603,461
$4,681,720
$4,681,720
Earmarks
$5,050,000
$0
$0
$0
LOW-NO - GBTA
$1,450,000
$0
$0
$0
SEC 5339 Discretionary - Norwalk TD
$3,600,000
$0
$0
$0
$193,487,052
$192,130,418
$195,396,635
$195,396,635
SEC 5307
Enhancement
Small Intensive Cities
Capital
SEC 5311(b)(3)
SEC 5337 (High Intensity Fixed Guideway)
Hartford
Southwestern
SEC 5337 (High Intensity Motorbus)
Hartford
Total
In order to generate investment scenarios for transit assets, the funding must
be organized by mode (use) rather than by program (source). A summary of
estimated funding uses for transit over the four-year period of the PT-TAMP,
organized by mode, is shown in Table 5-3 below. This table includes all federal
funding; however, funding for non-SGR activities was excluded from the TAPT
Model.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-4
Federal fund use is split between bus and rail assets. Statewide bus funding
included in the investment scenarios comes from Sections 5307, 5311, 5337,
5339; and earmarks. The Section 5337 funding for Hartford is fixed guideway
funding and can be used on CTfastrak and approximately 65% of Section 5307
funding is programmed for bus projects, based on historical trends. Rail
funding comes from Sections 5307 and 5337. Section 5337 funding for
Southwestern is fixed guideway funding and used for rail projects and
approximately 35% of Section 5307 funding is programmed for rail projects,
based on historical trends. The estimates of federal funding by mode shown in
Table 5-3 are averages which can fluctuate depending on the projects being
undertaken by mode each year. Table 5-3 also includes FTA planning funds.
For state public transportation bond funding, CTDOT traditionally assumes 20%
will be dedicated to the bus program and 80% to the rail program. Again,
within the State Public Transportation Bonds, the Bond funds are divided into
State Match for Federal and projects with 100% State Funding. These
estimates are an average which can fluctuate depending on actual projects
underway in any given year.
Let’s Go CT funding is authorized but not appropriated through 2020 only. The
breakdown of Let’s Go CT funding is required by legislation, not estimated. For
the year 2021, the estimated additional state funds required to sustain Let’s
Go CT are included.
Table 5-3. Summary of Estimated Funding Uses for Transit
Value by Fiscal Year ($M) in 2018 dollars
Description
2018
2019
2020
2021
Bus
$130
$156
$127
$127
Federal
$82
$79
$80
$80
State Match
$21
$20
$20
$20
PT State Bonds
$27
$29
$27
$27
$0
$28
$0
$0
$309
$714
$825
$628
$105
$107
$109
$109
$26
$27
$27
$27
$163
$170
$162
$162
$15
$410
$527
$330
Other (FTA planning funds)
$1
$1
$2
$2
5310 Program
$5
$5
$5
$5
$445
$876
$958
$761
Let's Go CT
Rail
Federal
State Match
PT State Bonds
Let's Go CT
Total
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-5
Current Estimated Investment Needs
Current capital investment needs for bus for 2018 are approximately $74
million. Figure 5-1 shows these investment needs for 2018 for the bus mode,
broken down by asset category. Rolling stock constitutes 92% of CTDOT’s bus
mode need, equipment constitutes 5%, and facility constitutes 3%. There are
no modeled needs for bus infrastructure because the TAPT model results do
not include CTfastrak busway assets.
$2,432,448
$3,231,403
$68,028,655
Rolling Stock
Equipment
Modeling SGR
Needs
TAPT only models
certain SGR needs.
There are additional
needs beyond SGR
needs addressed in
the capital program,
and additional SGR
needs short of capital
replacement that are
addressed in capital
and operating
budgets.
Facility
Figure 5-1. Estimated Investment Needs by Asset Category in 2018 (Bus Mode)
Current capital investment needs for rail for 2018 are approximately $3 billion.
Figure 5-2 shows investment needs in 2018 for the rail mode, broken down by
asset category. Infrastructure constitutes 87% of CTDOT’s rail mode need,
rolling stock constitutes 8%, facility constitutes 5% and equipment constitutes
1%.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-6
$79,711,302
$241,925,340
$6,300,000
$2,820,117,267
Rolling Stock
Equipment
Infrastructure
Facility
Figure 5-2. Estimated Investment Needs by Asset Category in 2018 (Rail Mode)
Investment Scenarios
This section builds on the estimated available funding to generate investment
scenarios to help identify and prioritize state of good repair investments in
capital assets. As described in chapter four, CTDOT uses TAPT to predict transit
asset conditions and SGR investment needs. The PT-TAMP includes multiple
investment scenarios:
•
Scenario 1 - Federal Program with State Match Only
•
Scenario 2 - Federal Program with State Match plus Remaining PT
Annual Bond Program Funds
•
Scenario 3 - Federal Program with State Match plus Remaining PT
Annual Bond Program Funds plus Let’s Go CT Program Funds
Note that because CTDOT programs bus and rail assets differently in the capital
planning and programming process, bus and rail assets are modeled separately
in the PT-TAMP. Also, the investment scenarios are not divided into Tier I and
Tier II for the bus mode assets. This approach reflects CTDOT’s capital planning
practices and allows CTDOT to analyze the needs of the entire transit system.
TAPT is only modeling capital needs for the transit assets included in this plan.
Projected Funding Level by Scenario
Each investment scenario is generated by modeling transit needs using a
certain funding level, or budget. The budget is the variable input. TAPT models
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-7
only certain SGR activities, so the corresponding budget should only include
funding directed to those activities. For that reason, each SGR funding level
used as a budget in the investment scenarios is derived from Table 5-3.
A budget for each of the three investment scenarios was defined in a multistep process. The first step was to review the 2018 STIP and 2017 capital plan
to categorize transit funding as either SGR or non-SGR activities for the fouryear period of the PT-TAMP, organized by rail or bus mode. Based on that
review, the following percentages were calculated. Table 5-4 shows the
percent of total funds used for modeled SGR activities, by source.
Table 5-4. Percent of Total Funds Used for Modeled SGR Activities, by Source
Description
Federal
State Match
PT State Bonds
Let’s Go CT
Bus
49.0%
49.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Rail
96.8%
96.8%
97.5%
100.0%
Next, the total estimated SGR funding for bus, calculated by multiplying the
percentages in Table 5-4 by the values in Table 5-3, was divided by the total
overall funding for bus to calculate an estimated percent of total funds used
for modeled SGR activities. The same process was repeated for rail. As shown
in Table 5-5, 36.5% of funds for bus are estimated to be used for SGR activities
and 98.6% of funds for rail are estimated to be used for SGR activities.
Table 5-5. Percent of Total Funds Used for Modeled SGR Activities
Description
Federal
Bus
36.5%
Rail
98.6%
These percentages were applied to the total funding for transit in each
investment scenario, shown in Table 5-6, in order to generate an estimated
annual funding level for SGR activities, by year and mode.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-8
Table 5-6. Total Funds by Scenario
Funds ($M) in current dollars
Description
2018
2019
2020
2021
Scenario 1
$102.5
$98.8
$100.0
$100.0
Scenario 2
$129.5
$127.8
$127.0
$127.0
Scenario 3
$129.5
$155.8
$127.0
$127.0
Scenario 1
$131.3
$133.8
$136.3
$136.3
Scenario 2
$294.3
$303.8
$298.3
$298.3
Scenario 3
$309.3
$713.8
$825.3
$628.3
Bus
Rail
The estimated SGR funding by year was adjusted for inflation assuming a 3%
inflation rate and averaged to yield an average annual SGR funding level for
each scenario for bus and rail. The values presented in Table 5-7 are the
budgets used for modeling SGR investments in TAPT for the PT-TAMP.
Table 5-7. SGR Funds by Scenario
Funds ($M) in constant dollars
2018
2019
2020
2021
Annual
Average
(2018-2021)
Scenario 1
$37.4
$35.0
$34.4
$33.4
$35.0
Scenario 2
$47.2
$45.2
$43.6
$42.4
$44.6
Scenario 3
$47.2
$55.1
$43.6
$42.4
$47.1
Scenario 1
$129.5
$128.1
$126.7
$123.0
$126.8
Scenario 2
$290.3
$290.9
$277.3
$269.2
$281.9
Scenario 3
$305.1
$683.6
$767.3
$567.1
$580.8
Description
Bus
Rail
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-9
The following sections present the investment scenario results for the bus and
rail modes.
Bus Mode
Scenario 1
Estimated investment needs and projected work in Scenario 1 are shown in
Figure 5-3. Given federal funding and state match, projected work will trim
needs from $74 million in 2018 to around $56 million in 2021.
$90M
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
$40M
Needs
$30M
Work
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-3. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 1 (Bus Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-10
Scenario 2
Estimated investment needs and projected work in Scenario 2 are shown in
Figure 5-7. Total need in 2021, $55 million, will be met.
$90M
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
Needs
$40M
Work
$30M
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-4. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 2 (Bus Mode)
Scenario 3
Estimated investment needs and projected work in Scenario 3 are shown in
Figure 5-5. Total need in 2020 ($79 million) and 2021 ($20 million) will be met.
$90M
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
Needs
$40M
Work
$30M
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-5. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 3 (Bus Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-11
Rail Mode
Scenario 1
Estimated rail mode investment needs and projected work in Scenario 1 are
shown in Figure 5-6. Projected work will reduce needs from nearly $3 billion in
2018 to roughly $2.75 billion in 2021.
$3500M
$3000M
$2500M
$2000M
Needs
$1500M
Work
$1000M
$500M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-6. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 1 (Rail Mode)
Scenario 2
Estimated rail mode investment needs and projected work in Scenario 2 are
shown in Figure 5-7. Projected work will reduce needs from nearly $3 billion in
2018 to roughly $2.3 billion in 2021.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-12
$3500M
$3000M
$2500M
$2000M
Needs
$1500M
Work
$1000M
$500M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-7. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 2 (Rail Mode)
Scenario 3
Estimated rail mode investment needs and projected work in Scenario 3 are
shown in Figure 5-8. Projected work will reduce needs from nearly $3 billion in
2018 to roughly $2.1 billion in 2021.
$3500M
$3000M
$2500M
$2000M
Needs
$1500M
Work
$1000M
$500M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 5-8. Estimated Investment Needs and Work, Scenario 3 (Rail Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Scenarios
5-13
This page intentionally left blank
CTDOT PT-TAMP
CHAPTER 6
Investment
Plan
The investment plan is a key piece of CTDOT’s
commitment to achieve and maintain SGR for transit
assets. The investments in this chapter reflect
CTDOT’s TAM goals and objectives and are
prioritized based on projected SGR needs and
available TAM funding.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
This chapter describes the current capital planning process at CTDOT and
presents a prioritized list of SGR investments. Incorporating the inventory
and condition data summarized in chapter three into the analytical
approach described in chapter four, CTDOT has modeled asset performance
and investment needs. The list of prioritized investments is an output of
TAPT and is aligned with the goals and objectives represented in the CTDOT
capital plan.
Federal Legislative Context
In 49 CFR 625.25, FTA requires that a TAM plan include a “provider’s
project-based prioritization of investments.” FTA defines investment
prioritization as “a transit provider’s ranking of capital projects or programs
to achieve or maintain a state of good repair. An investment prioritization is
based on financial resources from all sources that a transit provider
reasonably anticipates will be available over the TAM plan horizon period.”
In 49 CFR 625.33, FTA requires that a transit provider must consider the
following when developing the investment prioritization:
•
Projects to improve an identified unacceptable safety risk
•
Estimated available funding for TAM projects
•
Requirements under 49 CFR 37.161 and 37.163 concerning
maintenance of accessible features and the requirements under
49 CFR 37.43 concerning alteration of transportation facilities
Projects must be ranked in order of priority and anticipated project year,
and project rankings must be consistent with agency TAM policy and
strategies.
Capital Planning Process
This section presents a summary of CTDOT’s current capital planning
process.
CTDOT is the designated recipient for all FTA programs and is responsible
for service and planning decisions for rail, fixed-route bus and
complementary paratransit service in the urbanized and rural areas of the
state. As the designated recipient, CTDOT programs and plans the formula
funding from Section 5307 (the largest FTA source of funds) and creates a
funding pool from which capital projects in regions around the state are
funded. CTDOT does not utilize a formula to reallocate Section 5307
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-2
formula funds to the bus operators, rather the funding pool allows for a
cooperative, nondiscriminatory allocation of funds to different regions
based on annual needs. The disbursement of these funds is approved by
the Metropolitan Planning Organizations in the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP). Sub-area split agreements that reflect the
annual disbursement of funds by region are created by CTDOT and
executed by the operators from each region. This program allows local
transit operators to fund major projects for which they may otherwise have
never accumulated adequate funds.
CTDOT prioritizes public transportation investments that ensure public
safety, restore the infrastructure to a state of good repair, improve the
customer experience, and promote economic development.
The Bus Capital Program supports transit services around the state
including state-owned CT transit operations in eight urban areas, transit
district-owned services in seven other urban areas, rural services in five
areas around the state, and para-transit operations in 13 transit districts.
The Rail Capital Program includes capital projects necessary to support the
existing commuter railroads: New Haven Line, Shore Line East, and the
Hartford Line. The overall program is intended to bolster service reliability
and operational efficiency, replace outdated and undersized facilities and
provide the capacity for growth in rail service.
CTDOT has a five-point action plan which identifies the major areas for
prioritizing and emphasizing investments for all modes of transportation.
The points were determined after careful consideration of available
resources, and federal and State mandates and initiatives.
The following are the components of this five-point action plan:
•
Preservation - Maintain the Existing System in a State-of-GoodRepair. CTDOT has identified preservation and maintenance of the
existing system as its highest priority for targeting the limited
available resources. CTDOT will invest in maintaining and repairing
the transportation system before expanding it or adding new
system components.
•
System Modification - Safety & Modernization. Safety is a major
concern for CTDOT. Modification needs identified for improving
safety are a high priority when considering the allocation of staff,
funding and equipment. In addition to preserving and maintaining
the system to ensure the general safety of the traveling public,
CTDOT will continue to consider areas where system modification
could significantly improve safety beyond the constraints of the
existing infrastructure’s limitations.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-3
•
System Productivity – Efficiency. System productivity refers to
maximizing use of the existing system by facilitating travel in and
between modes. This is done by applying improved technologies,
coordinating the scheduling of maintenance efforts and providing
real-time travel information to the public. The development and
application of new technology and improved construction
practices, the continued advancement and expansion of Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITS), and the provision of real time
information to users of Connecticut’s highway system and public
transportation services are critical components of CTDOT’s plan to
address the current and future mobility needs of the State’s
residents, businesses, and visitors. CTDOT will continue to identify
and invest in ways to maximize the use of the existing
transportation system. As part of enhancing system productivity,
CTDOT is committed to encouraging commuters to use transit and
ridesharing options.
•
Economic & Environmental Impact - Quality of Life. It is critical to
the health of the State and its residents that the transportation
system has a positive impact on the state’s economy, physical
environment and, ultimately, quality of life. The availability of
multiple options for meeting mobility needs of people and for
freight contributes to the development of economically vibrant,
sustainable communities that provide residents with the ability to
make lifestyle choices that have positive impacts on themselves,
others and their environments. It is essential that CTDOT assists in
improving and expanding mobility options throughout the state by
considering and addressing the needs of stakeholders such as
pedestrians, bicyclists and users of other non-motorized means of
transportation when undertaking projects. CTDOT takes a contextsensitive solutions (CSS) approach when undertaking projects to
ensure active public participation and implementation of designs
that are appropriately scaled to both the community and the need.
CTDOT must also facilitate the efficient and cost-effective
movement of people and freight within and through the state.
Additionally, CTDOT must ensure the security of the transportation
system, as this is directly correlated to community health and
economic vitality. Ultimately, it is a responsibility of all State
agencies to support efforts of their sister agencies in stimulating
the economy and protecting the quality of life of the state’s
residents; CTDOT is committed to its part in this effort.
•
Strategic Capacity Improvements. When necessary, CTDOT will
pursue strategic capacity improvements to improve the efficiency
of the transportation system. When CTDOT evaluates projects
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-4
designed to enhance, expand or modify limits on system capacity,
an important factor in the decision-making process will be the
extent to which a project contributes to providing greater mobility,
accessibility and integration of the various transportation modes.
Any improvements to capacity will only be undertaken after
seriously considering the availability of funding and resource
allocations. Priority will be given to “Fix- it-First” initiatives.
DOT’s process to develop the capital plan predates the TAM plan
requirement and the use of TAPT to prioritize investments. The capital plan
is CTDOT’s definitive list of planned investments. The prioritized list of
investments presented in the following section is a list of SGR investments
recommended by TAPT and is complementary to the capital planning
process.
Recommended Work by Category
This section presents more detailed results of the investment scenarios
introduced in chapter five. The following figures show the projected work
recommended by the TAPT model over the four year period of the PTTAMP, organized by asset category. The TAPT model scenario results are
included in Appendix F.
Bus Mode
Scenario 1
A breakdown of the expected work by asset category in Scenario 1 is shown
in Figure 6-1. Rolling stock work makes up the majority of projected
spending in the first two years, followed by increased investment in
facilities. Rolling stock work constitutes 65% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the bus mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while facilities and equipment constitute 32% and 3%, respectively.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-5
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
Rolling Stock
$40M
Equipment
Facility
$30M
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-1. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 1 (Bus Mode)
Scenario 2
In Scenario 2, rolling stock work makes up the majority of projected
spending. Rolling stock work constitutes 74% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the bus mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while facilities and equipment constitute 23% and 3%, respectively. A
breakdown of the expected work by asset category in Scenario 2 is shown
in Figure 6-2.
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
Rolling Stock
$40M
Equipment
Facility
$30M
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-2. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 2 (Bus Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-6
Scenario 3
In Scenario 3, rolling stock work makes up the majority of projected
spending. Rolling stock work constitutes 74% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the bus mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while facilities and equipment constitute 23% and 3%, respectively.
The only difference between Scenario 2 and 3 is that rolling stock work is
moved forward from 2021 to 2020 in Scenario 3. A breakdown of the
expected work by asset category in Scenario 3 is shown in Figure 6-3.
$80M
$70M
$60M
$50M
Rolling Stock
$40M
Equipment
Facility
$30M
$20M
$10M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-3. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 3 (Bus Mode)
Rail Mode
Scenario 1
In Scenario 1, infrastructure work makes up nearly all of projected
spending. Infrastructure work constitutes 86% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the rail mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while facilities and rail rolling stock constitute 8% and 6%,
respectively. Spending on equipment is less than 0.1% of the total. A
breakdown of the expected work by asset category is shown in Figure 6-4.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-7
$800M
$700M
$600M
$500M
Rolling Stock
Equipment
$400M
Infrastructure
$300M
Facility
$200M
$100M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-4. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 1 (Rail Mode)
Scenario 2
In Scenario 2, infrastructure work makes up nearly all of projected
spending. Infrastructure work constitutes 88% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the rail mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while facilities and rail rolling stock constitute 9% and 3%,
respectively. Spending on equipment is less than 0.1% of the total. A
breakdown of the expected work by asset category is shown in Figure 6-5.
$800M
$700M
$600M
$500M
Rolling Stock
Equipment
$400M
Infrastructure
$300M
Facility
$200M
$100M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-5. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 2 (Rail Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-8
Scenario 3
In Scenario 3, infrastructure work makes up nearly all of projected
spending. Infrastructure work constitutes 83% of estimated transit asset
management spending on the rail mode over the four-year period of the
plan, while rail rolling stock and facilities constitute 10% and 7%,
respectively. Spending on equipment is 0.3% of the total. The large increase
in infrastructure work shown in 2021 is the recommended to replace a
movable bridge at the cost of roughly $750 million. A breakdown of the
expected work by asset category is shown in Figure 6-6.
$800M
$700M
$600M
$500M
Rolling Stock
Equipment
$400M
Infrastructure
$300M
Facility
$200M
$100M
0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-6. Recommended Work by Asset Category, Scenario 3 (Rail Mode)
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-9
Predicted Asset Performance
The estimated impact of the recommended work on asset condition is
summarized by asset category in Figures 6-7 thru 6-10. Each figure shows
the current performance of each asset class, and predicted performance by
Fiscal Year from 2018-2021 for each funding scenario. Note that slow zone
performance is not modeled in this plan and thus rail infrastructure
predictions are not included.
Figure 6-7 shows predicted performance for bus rolling stock. The
performance measure on the y-axis is the percent of vehicles at or
exceeding the ULB.
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Target (June 30th)
Transit Bus
Articulated Bus
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
0%
2017
Over the Road Bus
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
2018
2019
2020
2019
2020
2021
Cutaway Bus
100%
0%
2017
2018
2021
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-7. Predicted Performance for Bus
Rolling Stock
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-10
Figure 6-8 shows predicted performance for rail rolling stock. The
performance measure on the y-axis is the percent of vehicles at or
exceeding the ULB.
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Target (June 30th)
MNR Locomotives
MNR Push Pull Coaches
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
0%
2017
20%
2018
2019
2020
2021
0%
2017
MNR EMU's
2019
2020
2021
SLE Locomotives
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
0%
2017
2018
20%
2018
2019
2020
2021
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
SLE Push Pull Coaches
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-8. Predicted Performance for Rail Rolling Stock
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-11
Figure 6-9 shows predicted performance for equipment. The performance
measure on the y-axis is the percent of vehicles at or exceeding the ULB.
Automobiles
Rubber Tire Vehicle
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
0%
2017
2018
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
2018
2019
2020
2021
2020
2021
Van
Sport Utility Vehicles
0%
2017
2019
2020
2021
0%
2017
2018
2019
Steel Wheel Vehicles
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-9. Predicted Performance for Equipment
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-12
Figure 6-10 shows predicted performance for facilities. The performance
measure on the y-axis is the percent of facilities rated below condition 3 on
the TERM scale.
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Target (June 30th)
Bus Admin/Maintenance Facilities
Bus Passenger Facilities
100%
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Rail Passenger Facilities
0%
2017
100%
80%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20%
20%
2018
2019
2020
2019
2020
2021
Rail Admin/Maintenance Facilities
100%
0%
2017
2018
2021
0%
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Figure 6-10. Predicted Performance for Facilities
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-13
Prioritized List of Investments
Tier I Bus Investment Prioritization
The prioritized list of Tier I Bus investments is included in Appendix F. The
modeling results are generally consistent with CTDOT’s capital plan, but
have not been specifically reconciled with the plan. Projects identified in
the prioritization list are taken directly from CTDOT’s 2017-2021 Capital
Plan in Appendix G. A number of assets have been left out of modeling due
to lack of data, insufficient data, or newly constructed assets. This includes
ferries, CTfastrak guideway, and other assets.
Service vehicles are replaced differently than revenue vehicles in
Connecticut. Age, mileage, condition and service hours in addition to the
transit providers' overall assessment of the vehicle all factor into the
replacement of a service vehicle. So in reality those service vehicles rising
to the top of this prioritized list of Tier I investments might not be replaced
for years beyond their ULB.
For Capital Plan programming purposes service vehicles are grouped under
the SCV Vehicle and Administrative Capital/Miscellaneous Support
Equipment line in the Capital Plan. Funding is available for replacement but
ultimately CTDOT depends on the transit providers to assess the service
vehicles for safe operation and request replacement when necessary.
The top priorities are replacements of CTtransit service vehicles. More
expensive investment priorities include work on the CTtransit Hartford
Admin/Maintenance facility, as well as replacement of 41 CTtransit New
Haven transit buses and 48 CTtransit Hartford transit buses.
Rail Investment Prioritization
The prioritized list of rail investments is included in Appendix F. The top
priorities are replacement of MNR locomotives from 1960 and
replacements of ties and track in TERM condition rating 1 and 2. Some
guideway assets, including ties and track, are grouped by condition rating
because there is condition data but no location data for the assets. Other
top priorities include work on rail platforms.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Investment Plan
6-14
CHAPTER 7
Implementation
and Monitoring
TAM is a series of processes intended to help
preserve asset condition over the life of the asset at
minimal cost. Practicing TAM means continuous
improvement and TAM practices and processes need
to be documented and reevaluated on an ongoing
basis. As CTDOT continues implementing TAM and
maturing its TAM practices and processes, the
agency is always looking for opportunities for
improvement. CTDOT has developed a set of
implementation tasks to help improve TAM and
update the PT-TAMP.
Connecticut Department of Transportation
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Overview
This chapter supplements the plan’s discussion of current asset
management practices in Connecticut with the identification of key
implementation activities that will help to continue to improve our TAM
practices. The PT-TAMP is a living document that will evolve to reflect
changing TAM practices and processes at CTDOT. This plan addresses needs
for both Tier I and Tier II implementation, which CTDOT approaches in an
integrated manner.
Federal Legislative Context
In 49 CFR 625.25, FTA requires that a Tier I provider must include the
following items in a TAM plan:
•
A provider’s TAM plan implementation strategy
•
A description of key TAM activities that a provider intends to
engage in over the TAM plan horizon period
•
A summary or list of the resources, including personnel, that a
provider needs to develop and carry out the TAM plan
•
An outline of how a provider will monitor, update, and evaluate, as
needed, its TAM plan and related business practices, to ensure the
continuous improvement of its TAM practices
In 49 CFR 625.5, implementation strategy is defined as “a transit provider’s
approach to carrying out TAM practices, including establishing a schedule,
accountabilities, tasks, dependencies, and roles and responsibilities.”
Key asset management activities are defined as “a list of activities that a
transit provider determines are critical to achieving its TAM goals.”
TAM Plan Implementation Strategy
CTDOT implementation of TAM began before the FTA rule on TAM was
finalized. CTDOT established a PT TAM Unit to coordinate TAM
implementation and lead development of the PT-TAMP.
In anticipation of the final rule, CTDOT conducted a gap assessment of
transit asset management practices in Connecticut. This initial effort had
four objectives:
•
Assess the current state of transit asset management practices at
CTDOT
•
Perform a transit asset management gap assessment
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-2
•
Assess readiness to comply with FTA transit asset management
requirements
•
Develop implementation plan for addressing gaps
The effort was organized into a series of tasks designed to achieve the
objectives.
CTDOT reviewed transit asset management materials to gain understanding
of the current state of practice at the agency. As part of the review of
current practices, the PT TAM Unit interviewed CTDOT staff from a variety
of offices and staff from transit providers that operate in Connecticut.
These in-person interviews helped the project team form an understanding
of current transit asset management practices in Connecticut and also
illustrated potential gaps in current practices. The interviews, along with
the review of existing materials and the gap analysis survey, informed the
writing of the gap assessment.
CTDOT also performed a literature review of best practices in asset
management, including transportation asset management self-assessment
tools and maturity models. The review included documents from federal
agencies, state agencies, local agencies, and other organizations.
Based on the review of best practices, the PT TAM Unit developed a CTDOT
transit asset management self-assessment which included 27 multiple
choice questions. The survey was sent to 80 individuals representing five
different groups: CTDOT, transit districts, CTtransit, Amtrak, and MetroNorth. The self-assessment served as a gap analysis survey. Following the
completion of the survey, the PT TAM Unit compiled survey results and
prepared a summary of the results.
The PT TAM Unit organized and facilitated a transit asset management
workshop at CTDOT to present the results of the gap analysis. Group
sessions were used to brainstorm implementation tasks to address the
gaps.
Using the workshop results, the PT TAM Unit drafted a gap assessment
document comparing existing transit asset management practices to best
practices and needs for supporting development of an FTA-compliant asset
management plan. The gaps represent the deficiencies in current practices
relative to best practices and/or practices needed to fulfill FTA’s asset
management requirements. The gaps were organized into four types:
•
Inventory and Condition Gaps
•
Business Process Gaps
•
Information Systems Gaps
•
Staffing Gaps
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-3
This assessment provided the foundation for the development of an initial
TAM implementation plan, which included tasks to improve transit asset
management practices.
As CTDOT has made progress on implementing TAM and developing the PTTAMP, the initial implementation tasks have been updated based on
completed work. This chapter includes implementation tasks which
represent CTDOT’s next steps in its implementation of TAM.
Key TAM Activities
This section presents a series of key TAM activities that CTDOT either needs
or currently is doing to achieve asset management goals, improve TAM
practices, and integrate TAM throughout the agency.
Development of Asset Hierarchy and Inventory
CTDOT built the SGR Transit Database during the development of the PTTAMP, as referenced in chapter three. Many of Connecticut transit service
providers own, operate and maintain their transit assets therefore they are
not registered in CORE-CT, the financial register. An integral step in
accurate data collection and reporting is validating the SGR Transit
Database with all transit service providers. CTDOT will continue to develop
the SGR Transit Database into a more robust system and to coordinate data
collection with transit providers.
Define and Implement Condition Assessment
As part of the development of the PT-TAMP, CTDOT defined a condition
assessment approach for rolling stock, equipment, infrastructure, and
facilities, included in the Condition Assessment Guidance in Appendix B.
CTDOT will continue to implement the condition assessment approach and
assess the condition of transit assets. In particular, both
admin/maintenance and passenger facilities need condition assessments
and will develop a cyclical inspection program in order to meet FTA
reporting requirements on facilities. CTDOT will collect, maintain, and
update asset condition data. Part of this effort will include coordinating
with Amtrak and Metro-North for rail assets.
For CTfastrak, CTDOT will collect inventory and condition data using a
similar approach to CTDOT highway. CTDOT collects pavement inventory
and condition data using specially equipped Fugro Roadware Automatic
Road Analyzer (ARAN) vans. The entire CTDOT-maintained mainline is
measured each year. CTDOT performed an initial data collection run of
CTfastrak guideway in March 2015, prior to the system opening. CTDOT is
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-4
establishing a process for regular data collection, data processing, and
integration with the Pavement Management System.
Performance Measure Data Collection and Reporting
FTA requires that a provider must set performance targets annually for the
following program year. These targets must be reported to the NTD in the
provider’s annual data report. CTDOT will collect data to calculate federally
required performance measures for rolling stock, equipment,
infrastructure, and facilities. CTDOT will set performance targets for each
performance measure and report both targets and asset condition to the
NTD annually.
CTDOT currently maintains an online performance measure dashboard that
features proprietary measures linked to CTDOT’s mission. Some of the
existing performance measures on the dashboard are tied to transit assets.
CTDOT will add the FTA TAM performance measures to the dashboard and
continue to update the maintain the dashboard and the data for the
measures.
Implement a Statewide Facilities Asset Management
System
Using an asset or facilities management system to track day-to-day
inspection and maintenance activities is consistent with best practices in
asset management. CTDOT and other CT transit providers typically have
systems for managing maintenance of their vehicles but tend to need
systems for facility management.
CTDOT has begun the process of procuring a multimodal Facilities
Management Solution (FMS) to manage CTDOT’s entire asset class of
buildings within a single system. A comprehensive FMS can help CTDOT
record inventory, track assets, and manage the necessary asset
management activities to keep all CTDOT’s buildings operating in SGR.
CTDOT can also use the system to assist in predicting capital programming
expenditures in a transparent manner.
CTDOT went through an RFI process to gather information on FMS in 2017,
and is now considering an RFP moving forward. The software should
manage all asset management aspects of the building from maintaining the
current inventory, tracking asset condition, performing detailed
inspections, rating and ranking building assets by SGR, work order tracking
that links back and updated asset condition, building deterioration
modeling, and project prioritization and financial modeling multiple funding
scenarios.
Once implemented, the vision for the system will be to manage and inspect
CTDOT owned facility assets for both bus and rail, including other transit
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-5
providers as well. This activity is also being considered to address
management of other CTDOT asset classes in addition to transit facilities,
and was a requested requirement for FMS in the RFI process.
Improve Oversight of Maintenance Plans and Activities
CTDOT develops maintenance plans for new facilities, but appeared to need
mechanisms for confirming these plans are followed. Further, many older
facilities may not have maintenance plans altogether, or have outdated
information on who is responsible for certain maintenance tasks. CTDOT
also needed better oversight for other guideway assets along rail lines.
The Bureau of Public Transportation has taken initial steps to improve upon
these gaps through various actions and activities. The PT TAM Unit recently
worked with Office of Rail and MNR to update a rail passenger station
matrix that outlines which entities are supposed to perform specific
maintenance activities for New Haven Line Stations (snow removal,
electrical maintenance, cleaning, etc.) See Appendix C for a copy of this
matrix.
In addition, the Bureau of Public Transportation has developed a new Rail
Regulatory Unit within the Office of Rail to address oversight of rail
maintenance facilities and other rail guideway assets. Aside from primary
responsibilities of improving general oversight of MOW activities by MNR,
additional activities to date include developing pilot inspection programs
for rail yard facilities and grade crossings. This group will continue to work
closely with the PT TAM unit to ensure activities are coordinated and meet
FTA compliance.
The PT TAM Unit has also coordinated with Metro North who is in the
process of developing an enterprise asset management system for work
order management along the rail lines it operates including New Haven
Line. Coordination efforts have focused on ensuring CTDOT staff has access
to this system to further improve its oversight responsibilities for the New
Haven Line.
All of CT Transit divisions, including CTfastrak and all bus service providers
in Connecticut, have extensive vehicle and facility maintenance plans in
place, as required by the FTA. Procedures and specific maintenance
inspections on vehicles and facilities are detailed in these plans. The PT
TAM Unit will continue to coordinate with all bus transit service providers
in Connecticut as they explore and pilot different systems to ensure the
oversight of these maintenance plans.
Improve Predictive Capability for Fixed Assets
As part of PT-TAMP development, CTDOT reviewed tools for predicting
transit capital needs, including TAPT and FTA’s TERM Lite. CTDOT selected
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-6
TAPT as the predictive approach, loaded inventory and condition data, and
generated predictions of SGR needs and work.
CTDOT will continue to refine the modeling approach for transit assets,
particularly for fixed assets. Future modeling will require updated costs and
more detailed and comprehensive data, as available. CTDOT will seek
technical support for the training of TAPT as it works to integrate a defined
prioritization process for the capital plan. Part of this effort may include
coordinating with Amtrak and Metro-North for rail asset data.
The PT TAM Unit will also need to work with its transit operators to ensure
that the lifecycle needs/costs of the assets are being optimized and
captured through a data driven process, to better understand when
investments should be made. This will be an iterative process that involves
constant communication and development of data for analytical purposes
as well as the procurement or development of mature asset management
systems/software. Lifecycle strategies will differ by each transit operator
and by asset class:
Bus
•
Rolling Stock: CTtransit Hartford has a software called Asset Works
which tracks data on vehicles down to the part. This system provides
needed transparency and detail to accurately track lifecycle costs for all
vehicles.
•
Guideway: CTfastrak is a 9.4-mile bus-only guideway whose main
component is a paved surface similar to a highway asset. It was
determined that in order to track condition and predictive capabilities,
the CTfastrak system is best housed in CTDOT’s pavement management
system and roadway inventory network. Improvement activities
include geocoding the CTfastrak route into CTDOT’s GIS system, and
then using CTDOT’s adapted Photolog technology to ID features and
track pavement condition. The PT TAM Unit has coordinated with
Policy and Planning and Engineering to place the CTfastrak into these
systems by December 2018.
•
Facilities: As mentioned earlier, the FMS system by CTDOT is a
multimodal approach that includes CTtransit. CTtransit’s HNS operator
has decided to accelerate this process by obtaining a pilot version of a
FMS called FAMIS. They have begun data collection for this pilot and
will include all buildings at the Hartford, Hamden, and Stamford
facilities.
Rail
•
Rolling Stock: MNR adopted a 35-year ULB for its rolling stock, based on
the commercial life of many car types while incorporating a Reliability
Centered Maintenance (RCM) approach. This approach focuses on the
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-7
ability to study failure rates and types in order to become more
proactive in addressing maintenance issues and preserving the life of
its rolling stock. Implementing a successful RCM approach can reduce
dependency on costly capital repairs while also extending the life of an
asset, saving CTDOT substantial financial obligations in the long term.
•
Guideway: MNR performs day-to-day maintenance of CTDOT’s portion
of the New Haven Line. As part of MNR’s new EAM system INFOR, they
are currently implementing Bentley’s Optram software package in
order to better utilize data that is collected from the geometry cars
that test for defects along the rail infrastructure. The ability to better
use this data can be an invaluable tool to create more capital projects
that are proactive in rail replacement and reduce reliance on
emergency maintenance for rail defects.
•
Facilities: As mentioned earlier, CTDOT will be procuring a FMS that will
be able to collect better data on its rail facilities. Having more of this
data readily available can provide better insight into operating costs
and capital needs, to ensure facilities are constantly in SGR and
operating efficiently and safely.
Maintain and Update Transit Asset Management Plan
FTA requires that a transit provider must update its TAM plan every four
years. Additionally, a provider should amend its TAM plan when there is a
significant change to inventory, condition, or investment prioritization.
CTDOT will work to update the PT-TAMP on a four-year cycle and to revise
the plan to be consistent with any significant changes. Updating the PTTAMP will involve updating the inventory data, performing new condition
assessments, modeling new investment scenarios, and generating a new
list of prioritized SGR investments. CTDOT will also be responsible for
updating the Tier II plan in Connecticut.
Information Sharing
CTDOT will lead a set of activities to facilitate exchange of information on
asset management practices between transit providers in Connecticut.
Participants should include CTDOT staff, as well as transit providers under
contract to CTDOT, and the transit districts.
The SGR Transit Database created by the PT TAM Unit was crucial not only
for developing inventory, but creating a system where data could be
authenticated, maintained, and shared amongst various stakeholders who
depend on the data collected within this system. The PT TAM unit will be
responsible for establishing a set of guidelines on how to update and share
data that is stored within this database, particularly for personnel who are
not part of CTDOT staff.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-8
In addition, a long-term vision will be focused on how to integrate the SGR
Transit database into CTDOT’s existing and future data sharing structure.
CTDOT is currently in the process of developing a Transportation Enterprise
Database (TED) as a means of establishing a universal source of data by
linking numerous other databases into a universal system, and developing a
set of data governance principles to ensure data used is maintained and
authenticated.
PT TAM Unit will develop a program of periodic peer exchanges and/or
facilitated workshops to communicate current status of CTDOT transit asset
management activities and facilitate exchange of information on asset
management approaches/lessons learned. PT TAM Unit will organize,
conduct, and summarize these activities for the participants.
TAM Resources
This section describes the TAM resources needed to develop and carry out
the PT-TAMP. While CTDOT is integrating TAM throughout the agency,
there is a PT TAM Unit which currently includes three staff members
dedicated to TAM. This group is responsible for developing, maintaining,
and updating the PT-TAMP, and for coordinating, setting, and submitting
performance measures and targets to the NTD. A TAM Implementation
Committee will be created consisting of representatives from transit
providers and key CTDOT staff to support future TAM implementation
activities. CTDOT also convened working groups consisting of stakeholders
to help develop the PT-TAMP.
CTDOT will need to address its short and long term needs for an asset
inventory system. CTDOT is also using ongoing consultant support for TAM
implementation.
Monitoring and Evaluations
CTDOT will monitor, update, and evaluate the PT-TAMP as an ongoing
activity.
The PT TAM unit will lead the implementation activities, update the plan,
and periodically convene workshops to interface with other transit
providers. This work includes two of the TAM implementation activities
above: “Maintain and Update TAM Plan” and “Information Sharing”.
In addition, the PT TAM unit will lead a series of further monitoring and
evaluation activities in the following key areas:
•
Implementing use of asset management targets;
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-9
•
Improving STIP and capital plan development;
•
Informing Long-Range-Plan development;
•
Improving data collection;
•
Updating the asset management needs analysis; and
•
Support Tier II asset management implementation.
The following paragraphs discuss specific activities in each of these areas.
Implementing Use of Asset Management Targets. Moving forward the
measures and targets established for asset management should inform
investment decisions, and in particular the identification of and selection of
capital projects. The PT TAM Unit will work with CTDOT capital planning
and programming staff to establish targets, and ensure that the capital
program is structured to achieve these targets once set. To evaluate
progress in this area CTDOT will assess the degree to which the targets
established in the annual target-setting process are met.
Improving STIP and Capital Plan Development. An important product of
asset management plan development is the prioritized list of SGR needs
identified in chapter five. Ideally CTDOT and its partners will refer to this list
of needs in developing future STIPs and capital plans. To help accomplish
this, the PT TAM Unit will work with the CTDOT’s Council of Government
Coordination Unit to improve the connection between the STIP and the
Capital Program for Transit Assets. To evaluate progress in this area CTDOT
will assess whether the needs identified in this plan are incorporated in
future STIP updates to the extent needed funds are available.
Informing Long-Range-Plan Development. Moving forward it is important
for CTDOT and its planning partners to incorporate consideration of transit
asset management performance targets and the set of identified SGR needs
in the planning process. To help accomplish this, CTDOT is working on a
reporting mechanism to link prioritized projects and targets to the MPOs’
long range planning and programming process. To evaluate progress in this
area CTDOT will determine whether such a reporting mechanism has been
established, and if so whether it has been used in the planning process.
Improving Data Collection. The PT TAM Unit will be responsible for
managing the annual update of asset inventory and condition data.
Inventory will be updated in the SGR Transit Database.
As condition assessments are performed for various fixed assets, the
condition of the assets can be updated in the SGR Transit Database. For
rolling stock, equipment, and facilities, the condition data can be used
directly to calculate the FTA TAM performance measures. For guideway,
the slow zone performance measure will need to be updated separately.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-10
The PT-TAM Unit will coordinate with MPO’s and transit providers to set
targets annually through a set of information sharing activities. These
targets will be incorporated into an annual data report and narrative report
submitted to the NTD. The data report will include current condition and
the FTA TAM performance targets for the following year. The narrative
report will include a description of any changes in transit system condition
and describe progress made towards performance targets. The PT TAM
Unit will be responsible for drafting the narrative report.
To improve data collection the PT-TAM unit will implement a set of data
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) processes to verify the accuracy
and completeness of inventory and condition data. These processes will
specify the process for updating the data, and responsibility for
maintenance and upkeep of asset management data (data governance), as
well as specific steps to verify data quality and completeness. To evaluate
progress in this area CTDOT will assess whether CTDOT is successful in
timely completion of required reporting. Also, CTDOT will assess whether
the QA/QC processes have been established and are being followed.
Updating the Asset Management Needs Analysis. Although FTA does not
require annual updates of this plan, annual updates to the data and
assessment of SGR needs to support performance reporting requirements
and the related business processes described above. The PT-TAM unit will
update the SGR needs analysis on an annual basis to support these
requirements, incorporating the improvements to asset data and the
analysis of SGR needs described above. To evaluate progress in this area
CTDOT will assess whether the needs analysis is, indeed, updated on an
annual basis incorporating updates to asset data and supporting systems.
Support Tier II Asset Management Efforts. Comprehensive implementation
of an asset management approach addresses how an asset is managed over
its entire lifecycle, from construction or purchase through to its retirement
or replacement. Consequently, putting best practices in asset management
into place in an agency can impact a number of business functions.
Connecticut’s transit providers are committed to using an asset
management approach to help improve the State of Good Repair of
Connecticut’s physical transit assets, and make the best use of scarce
resources. Over time application of asset management concepts may
impact areas such as how maintenance decisions are made, what staff
transit agencies need to meet their mission, and the data and systems they
use.
The PT-TAM unit will help support Tier II transit agency efforts to
implement asset management concepts more broadly in their agencies
through the communication and outreach activities described previously in
this section. To evaluate progress in this area CTDOT will assess whether
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-11
the outreach activities are conducted as described in this document, and
the level of participation of the agencies in the various outreach activities.
This evaluation will help inform the set of asset management-related
activities that are needed in future updates of this plan.
CTDOT PT-TAMP: Implementation and Monitoring
7-12
Appendix A. Asset Fact Sheets
A-1
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Bus Rolling Stock
Description
• CTDOT owns the local bus
systems in Hartford, New
Haven, Stamford,
Waterbury, New Britain,
Bristol, Meriden, and
Wallingford, and operates
them under the CTtransit
brand name. CTDOT owns
all the rolling stock that
provides CTtransit services.
• CTtransit services carry
roughly 80% of annual bus
ridership in Connecticut.
• CTDOT also owns the bus
rapid transit system
CTfastrak, which includes
fixed guideway between
Hartford and New Britain.
• CTDOT’s bus rolling stock
inventory includes four
vehicle types: transit bus,
articulated bus, over-theroad bus, and cutaway.
Inventory and Condition
Transit Bus
A bus with front and center doors, normally with a rearmounted engine, low-back seating, and without luggage
compartments or restroom facilities for use in frequent- stop
service. This is what is used most typically on fixed route
systems. A 40-foot coach is the common type bus used in larger
systems. This vehicle can usually hold about 42 ambulatory
passengers when two wheelchair tiedowns are provided.
Articulated Bus
Extra-long (54 ft. to 60 ft.) bus with two connected passenger
compartments. The rear body section is connected to the main
body by a joint mechanism that allows the vehicles to bend
when in operation for sharp turns and curves and yet have a
continuous interior.
Over-the-road Bus
A bus characterized by an elevated passenger deck located
over a baggage compartment.
81%
Below ULB
12
Years ULB
51
100%
Vehicles
Below ULB
12
Years ULB
60
97%
Vehicles
Below ULB
12
Years ULB
Cutaway Bus
Performance
Measures
The percentage of revenue
vehicles within a particular
asset class that have either
met or exceeded their useful
life benchmark
• Useful life benchmark (ULB)
defines an asset’s economic
useful life, specified in terms
of age, mileage and/or
other factors. An agency can
use FTA’s default ULB values
or set its own values. CTDOT
has worked with its transit
service provider partners to
define custom values.
• A revenue vehicle that has
not reached or exceeded its
ULB is considered to have
met the performance
metric.
496
Vehicles
A vehicle that consists of a bus body that is mounted on the
chassis of a van or light-duty truck. The original van or lightduty truck chassis may be reinforced or extended. Cutaways
typically seat 15 or more passengers and may accommodate
some standing passengers.
42
100%
Vehicles
Below ULB
5
Years ULB
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
*The Performance measures herein are for FTA reporting purposes only. Due to the variability of mechanical reliability
and operating environment, the Age based metric prescribed by FTA does not accurately reflect SGR needs.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually.
Performance and Targets for Tier I Bus Rolling Stock
% Vehicles Below ULB
% Vehicles Met or Exceeded ULB
Current Performance Current Performance Performance Target
Asset Class
81%
19%
14%
Transit Bus
100%
0%
14%
Articulated Bus
97%
3%
14%
Over-the-Road Bus
100%
0%
17%
Cutaway
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Bus Rolling Stock (Tier I)
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Bus Rolling Stock
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Estimated Investment Needs by Year
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$45
$40
$35
The main 2018 initial needs include
replacing New Flyer transit buses from
the early 2000’s and a couple of MCI
over the road buses for the CTTransit
Stamford Division.
Millions
$30
$25
$20
Additional items that will enter the SGR
backlog from 2019-2021 include New
Flyer transit buses from the late 2000’s,
a 2007 MCI over the road bus, and 22
cutaways from CTTransit Waterbury in
2021.
$15
$10
$5
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Tier I Bus Rolling Stock
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$45
$40
$35
*Years referenced in these charts are by
State of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs
from July 1st to June 30th.
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match +
Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match +
Public Transportation State Bonds +
Lets Go CT
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that lists
all projects expected to be federallyfunded over a five-year period.
$30
Millions
CTDOT anticipates over $70 million of
SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its Tier I
Bus Rolling Stock. This includes an initial
backlog in 2018 of $40.4 million in SGR
needs, and an additional $30.4 million
of SGR needs from 2019-2021.
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Bus Rolling Stock (Tier I)
In Scenario 1, the TAPT model
recommends CTDOT invest nearly
$41million in Tier I bus rolling stock over
the 4 year horizon from 2018-2021.
Scenarios 2 and 3 recommends CTDOT
invest nearly $70.9 million in Tier I bus
rolling stock over the 4 year horizon.
Transit
Funding
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
Funding for Tier I bus assets
comes from a variety of
federal funding programs,
including Sections 5307,
5337, 5339.
Analytical
Approach
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Rolling Stock
Description
• The New Haven Line, which
serves stations along the
Connecticut shore from
New Haven to Greenwich
and on to Grand Central
Terminal in New York City,
is operated by Metro-North
(MNR) under contract to
CTDOT. CTDOT has a capital
interest in the rail vehicles
that operate on the line.
• Shore Line East (SLE),
operated by Amtrak under
contract to CTDOT, serves
stations from New London
to New Haven. SLE service
operates CTDOT-owned
rolling stock, which are also
used on Hartford Line (HL).
• CTDOT’s rail rolling stock
inventory includes three
vehicle types: locomotive,
passenger coach, and selfpropelled passenger car.
Inventory and Condition
Locomotive
Commuter rail vehicles used to pull or push
passenger coaches. Locomotives do not carry
passengers themselves.
22
46%
Vehicles
Below ULB
35
Years ULB
SLE/
HL
12
0%
Vehicles
Below ULB
25
Years ULB
Passenger Coach
Commuter rail passenger vehicles not
independently propelled and requiring one or
more locomotives for propulsion.
MNR
50
100%
Vehicles
Below ULB
35
Years ULB
SLE/
HL
33
0%
Vehicles
Below ULB
25
Years ULB
Self-Propelled
Passenger Car
Performance
Measures
The percentage of revenue
vehicles within a particular
asset class that have either
met or exceeded their useful
life benchmark
• Useful life benchmark (ULB)
defines an asset’s economic
useful life, specified in terms
of age, mileage and/or
other factors. An agency can
use FTA’s default ULB values
or set its own values. CTDOT
has worked with its transit
service provider partners to
define custom values.
• A revenue vehicle that has
not reached or exceeded its
ULB is considered to have
met the performance
metric.
MNR
Commuter rail passenger vehicles not requiring
a separate locomotive for propulsion.
310
88%
Vehicles
Below ULB
25
Years ULB
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
*The Performance measures herein are for FTA reporting purposes only. Due to the variability of mechanical
reliability and operating environment, the age based metric prescribed by FTA does not fully reflect SGR needs.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually. CTDOT set separate ULB’s for locomotives and passenger
coaches depending on the service line due to different maintenance strategies.
Performance and Targets for Rail Rolling Stock
% Vehicles Below ULB
Current
Asset Class
Performance
46%
Locomotive (MNR)
0%
Locomotive (SLE/HL)
100%
Passenger Coach (MNR)
0%
Passenger Coach (SLE/HL)
88%
Self-Propelled Passenger Car
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Rolling Stock
% Vehicles Met or Exceeded ULB
Current
Performance
Performance
Target
54%
100%
0%
100%
12%
September 2018
13%
17%
13%
17%
13%
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Rolling Stock
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Estimated Investment Needs for Rail Rolling Stock
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$250
$200
The 2018 initial needs include replacing
24 rail locomotives, the 36 1972 self
propelled vehicles, and all 33 Shore Line
East passenger coaches. The 2021
needs include replacing 20 New Haven
Line passenger coaches.
$150
Millions
CTDOT anticipates over $292 million of
SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its rail
rolling stock. This includes an initial
backlog in 2018 of nearly $242 million
in SGR needs, and an additional $50.4
million of SGR needs in 2021.
$100
$50
*Years referenced in these charts are by
State of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs
from July 1st to June 30th.
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Rail Rolling Stock
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$250
$200
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds +
Lets Go CT
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that
lists all projects expected to be
federally-funded over a five-year
period.
$150
Millions
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
$100
$50
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
In Scenarios 1 and 2, the TAPT model
recommends CTDOT invest nearly $31.7
million in rail rolling stock over the 4
year horizon from 2018-2021. Scenario
3 recommends CTDOT invest almost
$159 million in rail rolling stock over the
4 year horizon.
Transit
Funding
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
Federal funding for rail assets
comes from a variety of FTA
programs, including Sections
5307 and 5337.
Analytical
Approach
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Rolling Stock
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Service Vehicles
Description
• Service vehicles are defined
by FTA as equipment used
primarily to support
maintenance and repair
work for public
transportation.
• CTDOT’s service vehicles
support two modes of
travel: bus and commuter
rail.
• CTDOT’s 119 service
vehicles are organized into
five types. Trucks,
automobiles, SUVs, and
vans can be used as staff
vehicles. Steel wheel
vehicles are used for
inspection and
maintenance of facilities
and rights-of-way.
Inventory and Condition
Rubber Tire Vehicle (Truck)
Any motor vehicle designed to transport cargo.
74%
Below ULB
14
Years ULB
Automobile
Passenger cars, up to and including station wagons in size.
Excludes minivans and anything larger.
11
55%
Vehicles
Below ULB
5
Years ULB
Sport Utility Vehicle
A high-performance four-wheel drive car built on a truck
chassis. It is a passenger vehicle which combines the towing
capacity of a pickup truck with the passenger-carrying space
of a minivan or station wagon.
An enclosed vehicle having a typical seating capacity of 8 to
18 passengers and a driver. A van is typically taller and with
a higher floor than a passenger car, such as a hatchback or
station wagon.
27
70%
Vehicles
Below ULB
5
Years ULB
Van
Performance
Measures
The percentage of service
vehicles within a particular
asset class that have either
met or exceeded their useful
life benchmark
• Useful life benchmark (ULB)
defines an asset’s economic
useful life, specified in terms
of age, mileage and/or
other factors. An agency can
use FTA’s default ULB values
or set its own values. CTDOT
has worked with its transit
service provider partners to
define custom values.
• A service vehicle that has
not reached or exceeded its
ULB is considered to have
met the performance
metric.
27
Vehicles
11
46%
Vehicles
Below ULB
5
Years ULB
Steel Wheel Vehicle
Any support vehicle that is solely used on a running rail.
43
2%
Vehicles
Below ULB
25
Years ULB
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
*The Performance measures herein are for FTA reporting purposes only. Due to the variability of mechanical
reliability and operating environment, the age based metric prescribed by FTA does not fully reflect SGR needs.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually.
Performance and Targets for Tier I Service Vehicles
% Vehicles Below ULB
Current
Asset Class
Performance
74%
Rubber Tire Vehicle (Truck)
55%
Automobile
70%
Sport Utility Vehicle
46%
Van
2%
Steel Wheel Vehicle
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Service Vehicles (Tier I)
% Vehicles Met or Exceeded ULB
Current
Performance
Performance
Target
26%
45%
30%
54%
98%
September 2018
7%
17%
17%
17%
0%
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Service Vehicles
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Estimated Investment Needs for Tier I Service Vehicles
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$9.0
$8.0
$7.0
For Capital Plan programming purposes,
service vehicles are grouped under the
SCV Vehicle and Administrative
Capital/Miscellaneous Support
Equipment line in the Capital Plan.
Funding is available for replacement but
ultimately depends on the transit
providers to assess the service vehicles
for safe operation and request
replacement when necessary.
Millions
$6.0
$5.0
$4.0
$3.0
$2.0
$1.0
$0.0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Tier I Service Vehicles
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$8.0
$7.0
$5.0
$4.0
$3.0
$2.0
$1.0
$0.0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Service Vehicles (Tier I)
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
Funding for service vehicles
comes from a variety of
federal funding programs.
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
Analytical
Approach
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that
lists all projects expected to be
federally-funded over a five-year period.
$6.0
Transit
Funding
*Years referenced in these charts are by
State of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs
from July 1st to June 30th.
+ Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds +
Lets Go CT
$9.0
Millions
CTDOT anticipates about $9 million of
SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its Tier I
Service Vehicles. Most of the service
vehicles are part of the initial backlog in
2018, totaling around $8.1 million. The
majority of the backlog is the 43 steel
wheel vehicles for rail at $6.3 Million.
In Scenario 1, the TAPT model
recommends funding about $2.4 million
for service vehicle replacement for the 4
year horizon from 2018-2021.In
Scenario 2, the model recommends
funding about $2.7 million. In Scenario
3, the TAPT model recommends
eliminating the entire $9 million
backlog.
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Infrastructure
Description
• CTDOT owns rail
infrastructure on the
Northeast Corridor
between New Haven and
the New York/Connecticut
border, as well the New
Canaan, Danbury and
Waterbury Branch Lines.
Inventory and Condition
Track
Track-related infrastructure; includes running rail,
ties, turnouts, and ballast.
Power
Performance
Measures
Infrastructure related to the transmission of power
for signals and traction via the overhead contact
system. Includes AC substations, catenary plant,
catenary portals, and transmission equipment.
The FTA performance measure
for infrastructure is the
percentage of guideway that is
under speed restriction.
CTDOT also assesses rail
infrastructure condition using
other performance measures.
• For all rail infrastructure
assets other than structures,
CTDOT assesses condition
based on asset age. For each
asset type a ULB value is
specified in years. Asset
condition is then
approximated by comparing
the age of the asset to the
ULB. A condition rating is
assigned on the five-point
TERM scale based on a
conversion scale.
• CTDOT performs visual
inspections of structures to
assess conditions of the
bridge deck, superstructure
and substructure using the
10-point National Bridge
Inventory (NBI) condition
scale (with values ranging
from 0 to 9). For culverts a
single overall culvert rating
is specified. A bridge is
deemed to be in SGR if all of
its ratings are 5 or greater,
and not in SGR if any rating
is 4 or less.
243
375
60%
Track Miles
Turnouts
Below ULB
291
75%
288
Miles of
Catenary
44
Substation
assets
Communication
and Signals
Miles of
Below ULB
Power Cable
870
Catenary
Poles
243
89%
Track Miles Below ULB
Systems related to the monitoring and safety of train
movements. Includes switches and signals, grade crossings,
vehicle detection equipment, Intelligent Transportation
System technology, and Positive Train Control equipment.
Structures
Major Infrastructure to supplement safe
movement of trains above or below grade.
Includes Moveable Bridges, Fixed Bridges,
Culverts, Station Pedestrian Bridges/Tunnels, and
Retaining Walls.
148
36
63%
Fixed
Structures
Culvert
Structures
Rated
below 5
5
17
Moveable
Structures
Pedestrian
Structures
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
Slow Zone Restriction Performance Measure herein is required for FTA reporting purposes and does not fully reflect SGR
needs. Asset Condition is monitored through a combination of age, visual and hands on inspections, and performance
measures.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually.
Performance and Targets for Rail Infrastructure
% Guideway Slow Zone Restriction
Current
Asset Class
Performance Target
Performance
5%
2%
Rail Guideway
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Infrastructure (Tier I)
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Infrastructure
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Estimated Investment Needs for Rail Infrastructure
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$3,000
$2,500
Millions
$2,000
$1,500
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
The TAPT model SGR needs include
replacing two moveable bridges
estimated at $750 million each, and
other various bridge replacements,
track maintenance, and power and
signal upgrades.
$1,000
$500
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Rail Infrastructure
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$3,000
$2,500
Federal funding for rail assets
comes from a variety of FTA
programs, including Sections
5307 and 5337.
*Years referenced in these charts are by
State of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs
from July 1st to June 30th.
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match +
Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match +
Public Transportation State Bonds + Lets
Go CT
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that lists
all projects expected to be federallyfunded over a five-year period.
$2,000
Millions
Transit
Funding
CTDOT anticipates about $2.8 billion of
SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its New
Haven Line/Branch Line rail
infrastructure. The modeled SGR needs
are anticipated to enter the SGR
backlog in State Fiscal Year 2020. While
other SGR needs may arise in this
horizon period, the TAPT model was not
able to capture other potential needs
due to lack of more granular data.
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Infrastructure (Tier I)
In Scenario 1, the TAPT recommends
allocating about $469 million towards
infrastructure investments. In Scenario 2,
the TAPT recommends around $1.1 billion
towards infrastructure investments. With
Lets Go CT money allocated, the TAPT
recommends in Scenario 3 to invest around
$2.1 billion, to address nearly 2/3 of the
rail infrastructure backlog over the 4 year
horizon from 2018-2021.
Analytical
Approach
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Bus Facilities
Description
• CTDOT owns four
administrative or
maintenance bus facilities.
These are CTtransit facilities
in Hartford, Stamford, New
Haven, and Waterbury.
• CTDOT owns 10 bus
passenger facilities, all of
which are on the CTfastrak
bus rapid transit service.
• Only CTtransit Hartford
facility has had a recent
detailed inspection and
condition assessment.
Condition data for the
other facilities is based on
engineering judgement.
Inventory and Condition
Administrative/Maintenance
Administrative facilities are typically offices that house
management and supporting activities for overall transit
operations such as accounting, finance, engineering, legal,
safety, security, customer services, scheduling, and
planning. They also include facilities for customer
information or ticket sales, but that are not part of any
passenger station. Maintenance facilities are those where
routine maintenance and repairs or heavy maintenance or
unit rebuilds are conducted.
Passenger/Parking
Passenger facilities are significant structures on a separate
ROW.
• All motorbus, rapid bus, commuter bus, and trolley bus
passenger facilities in a separate ROW that have an
enclosed structure (building) for passengers for items such
as ticketing, information, restrooms, and concessions
• All transportation, transit or transfer centers, and transit
malls if they have an enclosed structure (building) for
passengers for items such as ticketing, information,
restrooms, concessions, and telephones
Performance
Measures
The percentage of facilities
within a particular asset class
rated below condition 3 on the
FTA Transit Economic
Requirements Model (TERM)
scale.
• Major facility components
are inspected and rated on
a 1 to 5 condition scale. The
component condition
ratings are averaged using
weight factors and
replacement cost to
calculate the overall
condition of a facility.
• For some components, a
visual inspection may be
insufficient for establishing
conditions. In these cases,
an age-based approach is
used to estimate condition
using useful life.
• A facility that has a
condition rating of 3 or
greater has met the
performance metric.
4
100%
Facilities
% rated
condition 3 or
above
10
100%
Facilities
% rated
condition 3 or
above
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
*Performance measure herein is required for FTA reporting purposes only. Condition Ratings are used to determine
overall SGR status either through engineering judgement or formal condition assessments, which may not reflect SGR
needs in its entirety.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually.
Performance and Targets for Tier I Bus Facilities
% Facilities Rated
% Facilities Rated
Condition 3 or Above
Below Condition 3
Current Performance
Asset Class
Current Performance Performance Target
Administrative/
100%
0%
0%
Maintenance
Passenger
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Bus Facilities (Tier I)
100%
0%
0%
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Bus Facilities
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Transit
Funding
Estimated Investment Needs for Tier I Bus Facilities
(TAPT Modeling Results)
CTDOT anticipates about $26.3 million
of SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its
Tier I Bus Facilities. The modeled SGR
needs are anticipated to enter the SGR
backlog in State Fiscal Year 2020. While
other SGR needs may arise in this
horizon period, the TAPT model was not
able to capture other potential needs
due to lack of formal condition
assessments at some facilities.
$30
$25
Millions
$20
$15
The TAPT model SGR needs include
various component level work at the
CTTransit Hartford and Stamford
facilities.
$10
$5
*Years referenced in these charts are by
State of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs
from July 1st to June 30th.
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Tier I Bus Facilities
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$30
$25
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds +
Lets Go CT
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that
lists all projects expected to be
federally-funded over a five-year
period.
$20
Millions
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
$15
$10
$5
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Bus Facilities (Tier I)
In all Scenarios, the TAPT model
recommends CTDOT invest nearly $26.3
million in Tier I bus facilities over the 4
year horizon from 2018-2021 to address
all modeled SGR needs.
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
Funding for Tier I bus assets
comes from a variety of
federal funding programs,
including Sections 5307, 5337,
5339.
Analytical
Approach
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
September 2018
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Facilities
Description
• CTDOT owns five
administrative or
maintenance rail facilities.
These are facilities in
Bridgeport, Danbury, New
Haven, Stamford, and
Springdale. However
condition data is not
available for all Facilities.
• CTDOT owns 43 rail
passenger facilities, serving
Metro North and Shore
Line East. Formal condition
assessments were
performed for all passenger
facilities in 2017.
Inventory and Condition
Administrative/Maintenance
Administrative facilities are typically offices that house
management and supporting activities for overall transit
operations such as accounting, finance, engineering, legal,
safety, security, customer services, scheduling, and
planning. They also include facilities for customer
information or ticket sales, but that are not part of any
passenger station. Maintenance facilities are those where
routine maintenance and repairs or heavy maintenance or
unit rebuilds are conducted.
Passenger/Parking
Passenger facilities are significant structures on a separate
ROW. For rail modes, passenger facilities typically mean a
platform area and any associated access structures or
accessory spaces accessible to passengers or by staff who
are in support of passenger service. Examples include
• All rail passenger facilities (except for light rail, cable car,
and streetcar modes)
• All light rail, cable car, and streetcar passenger facilities
that have platforms and serve track that is in a separate
ROW (not in mixed-street traffic)
• All transportation, transit or transfer centers, and transit
malls if they have an enclosed structure (building) for
passengers for items such as ticketing, information,
restrooms, concessions, and telephones
Performance
Measures
The percentage of facilities
within a particular asset class
rated below condition 3 on the
FTA Transit Economic
Requirements Model (TERM)
scale.
• Major facility components
are inspected and rated on
a 1 to 5 condition scale. The
component condition
ratings are averaged using
weight factors and
replacement cost to
calculate the overall
condition of a facility.
• For some components, a
visual inspection may be
insufficient for establishing
conditions. In these cases,
an age-based approach is
used to estimate condition
using useful life.
• A facility that has a
condition rating of 3 or
greater has met the
performance metric.
5
100%
Facilities
% rated 3 or
above
43
42%
Facilities
% rated 3 or
above
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
*Performance measure herein is required for FTA reporting purposes only. Condition Ratings are used to determine
overall SGR status either through engineering judgement or formal condition asssessments, which may not reflect SGR
needs in its entirety.
Current Performance and Targets
Transit providers must set one-year performance targets using the performance measures established by
FTA for the four capital asset categories required for a TAM plan, as applicable. These targets must be
updated and submitted to the NTD annually.
Performance and Targets for Rail Facilities
% Facilities Rated
3 or Above
Current
Asset Class
Performance
100%
Administrative/Maintenance
42%
Passenger
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Facilities (Tier I)
% Facilities Rated
Below Condition 3
Current
Performance
Performance
Target
0%
58%
September 2018
0%
0%
Connecticut Tier I Transit Asset Management Plan
Rail Facilities
2018-2021 Investment Needs
Estimated Investment Needs for Tier I Rail Facilities
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$90
$80
$70
Millions
$60
The main 2018 initial needs include station
platform electrical and structural
component level work at various stations
throughout the New Haven Line and Shore
Line East system.
$50
$40
$30
The 2020 SGR backlog items include some
anticipated component level work needed
at various Administrative /Maintenance
facilities.
$20
$10
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
2018-2021 Investment Scenarios
Recommended Investments for Tier I Rail Facilities
(TAPT Modeling Results)
$90
$80
$70
*Years referenced in these charts are by State
of Connecticut Fiscal Year which runs from July
1st to June 30th.
nScenario 1: Federal with State Match
Only
nScenario 2: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds
nScenario 3: Federal with State Match
+ Public Transportation State Bonds +
Lets Go CT
Funding Scenarios were developed by
CTDOT’s Capital Services Unit to reflect
how different available funding sources
impact what is programmed in CTDOT’s
5 year capital plan. Connecticut’s 20172021 Capital Plan is a document that
lists all projects expected to be
federally-funded over a five-year
period.
$60
Millions
CTDOT anticipates over $107 million of
SGR needs from 2018-2021 for its Rail
Passenger Facilities. This includes an initial
backlog in 2018 of $79.7 million in SGR
needs, and an additional $27.7 million of
SGR needs in 2020. While other SGR needs
may arise in this horizon period, the TAPT
model was not able to capture other
potential needs due to lack of formal
condition assessments at some facilities.
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
2018
2019
2020
2021
Based on CTDOT data as of March, 2018
CTDOT Asset Fact Sheet – Rail Facilities (Tier I)
In Scenario 1 and 2, the TAPT model
recommends CTDOT invest nearly $5.3
million in Tier I rail facilities over the 4
year horizon from 2018-2021. Scenario
3 recommends CTDOT invest nearly
$78.5 million in Tier I rail facilities over
the 4 year horizon.
Transit
Funding
Funding for transit in
Connecticut historically comes
primarily from FTA funds, with
the remainder coming from
state public transportation
bonds. Bond funds are used to
match federal funds and
provide funding for 100% of
state projects. Recently, the
Let’s Go CT program provided
an influx of transit funds and
currently accounts for a large
percentage of transit funding
in the short term.
Federal funding for rail assets
comes from a variety of FTA
programs, including Sections
5307 and 5337.
Analytical
Approach
CTDOT uses the Transit Asset
Prioritization Tool (TAPT) to
support its analytical
approach. TAPT is a
spreadsheet tool for predicting
transit asset conditions and
SGR needs.
The tool has a series of models
for different asset types that
recommend when to
rehabilitate or replace an
asset, and the conditions and
performance predicted for the
asset over time. Also, the tool
supports prediction of the
overall performance resulting
for a specified funding
scenario, and recommends a
prioritized list of projects to
fund given a budget
constraint.
September 2018
Appendix B. Condition Assessment Guidance Document
B-1
Condition Assessment Guidance
Connecticut Department of Transportation
May 15, 2018
Spy Pond Partners, LLC
with CDM Smith Inc.
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table of Contents
Table of Contents......................................................................................................................... 2
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background and Purpose ............................................................................................ 1
1.2 Document Organization ............................................................................................... 2
2.0 Revenue Vehicles .................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Inventory Data.............................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Condition Assessment Approach ................................................................................ 5
2.3 Assessment of Existing Data ....................................................................................... 6
3.0 Facilities .................................................................................................................................. 7
3.1 Administrative/Maintenance Facilities ......................................................................... 7
3.1.1 Inventory Data............................................................................................... 7
3.1.2 Condition Assessment Approach ................................................................. 7
3.1.3 Assessment of Existing Data ...................................................................... 10
3.2 Passenger Facilities ................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Inventory Data............................................................................................. 10
3.2.2 Condition Assessment Approach ............................................................... 10
3.2.3 Assessment of Existing Data ...................................................................... 12
4.0 Fixed Guideway.................................................................................................................... 13
4.1 Rail ............................................................................................................................. 13
4.1.1 Inventory Data............................................................................................. 13
4.1.2 Condition Assessment Approach ............................................................... 16
4.1.3 Assessment of Existing Data ...................................................................... 17
4.2 Bus ............................................................................................................................. 19
4.2.1 Inventory Data............................................................................................. 19
4.2.2 Condition Assessment Approach ............................................................... 19
4.2.3 Assessment of Existing Data ...................................................................... 20
5.0 Equipment ............................................................................................................................ 21
5.1 Inventory Data............................................................................................................ 21
5.2 Condition Assessment Approach .............................................................................. 21
5.3 Assessment of Existing Data ..................................................................................... 22
Appendix A. Detailed List of Items for Admin / Maintenance Facility Condition
Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Appendix B. Recommended Inspection Procedures for Administrative and Maintenance
Facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 1
Appendix C. Detailed List of Items for Passenger Facility Condition Assessment ............ 1
Appendix D. Detailed Rail Guideway Asset Hierarchy ............................................................ 1
List of Figures
Figure 1. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles.............................................................................. 3
Figure 2. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Bus ................................................................... 4
Figure 3. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Rail ................................................................... 4
Figure 4. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Ferry ................................................................. 5
Figure 5. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail .................................................................... 13
Figure 6. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Track ....................................................... 14
Figure 7. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Power ...................................................... 15
Figure 8. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Structure ................................................. 15
Figure 9. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Signal/Communications .......................... 16
Figure 10. Asset Hierarchy – Equipment – Service Vehicles ...................................................... 21
List of Tables
Table 1. ULB Values for Revenue Vehicles ................................................................................... 6
Table 2. FTA TERM Condition Assessment Scale ........................................................................ 8
Table 3. Administrative/Maintenance Facility Condition Assessment Components ..................... 8
Table 4. Conversion Scale: Component Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating ............................. 9
Table 5. Fire Protection and Conveyance Condition Assessment Scale ...................................... 9
Table 6. Passenger Facility Condition Assessment Components ............................................... 11
Table 7. Conversion Scale: Rail Guideway Asset Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating ............. 17
Table 8. MNR TYNA Summary Inventory - Rail ........................................................................... 18
Table 9. MNR TYNA Summary Inventory - Power ....................................................................... 18
Table 10. Pavement Condition Index Metrics .............................................................................. 19
Table 11. ULBs for Equipment ..................................................................................................... 22
Table A-1. Substructure ............................................................................................................... A-1
Table A-2. Shell ........................................................................................................................... A-1
Table A-3. Interior ........................................................................................................................ A-2
Table A-4. Plumbing .................................................................................................................... A-2
Table A-5. HVAC ......................................................................................................................... A-3
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-6. Electrical ..................................................................................................................... A-4
Table A-7. Fire Protection ............................................................................................................ A-4
Table A-8. Conveyance ............................................................................................................... A-4
Table A-9. Equipment .................................................................................................................. A-5
Table A-10. Site ........................................................................................................................... A-6
Table A-11. Yes/No Questions .................................................................................................... A-7
Table A-12. Additional Questions ................................................................................................ A-7
Table B-1. Recommendation Facility Inspection Procedures ..................................................... B-1
Table C-1. Substructure .............................................................................................................. C-1
Table C-2. Shell .......................................................................................................................... C-1
Table C-3. Interior ....................................................................................................................... C-2
Table C-4. Plumbing ................................................................................................................... C-2
Table C-5. HVAC ........................................................................................................................ C-3
Table C-6. Electrical.................................................................................................................... C-4
Table C-7. Fire Protection........................................................................................................... C-4
Table C-8. Conveyance .............................................................................................................. C-4
Table C-9. Fare Collection .......................................................................................................... C-5
Table C-10. Platform ................................................................................................................... C-5
Table C-11. Site .......................................................................................................................... C-6
Table C-12. Yes/No Questions ................................................................................................... C-7
Table C-13. Additional Questions ............................................................................................... C-7
Table D-1. Detailed Rail Guideway Asset Hierarchy ................................................................. D-1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background and Purpose
The mission of the Bureau of Public Transportation at Connecticut Department of Transportation
(CTDOT) is “to develop, maintain, and operate a system that provides for the safe, efficient and
sustainable movement of people and goods.” In pursuit of that mission, CTDOT has three transit
objectives:
•
Maintain existing systems at a state of good repair and enhance system safety and
security
•
Improve efficiency and effectiveness of transit service delivery
•
Expand services to capture a greater share of existing markets and address specific new
markets.
CTDOT faces an unusual challenge because of the transit service delivery model in
Connecticut. Unlike many other state DOTs, CTDOT owns transit systems including bus
operations throughout the state as well as the Shore Line East and New Haven Line commuter
rail service.
Fifty percent of CTDOT’s annual operating budget is dedicated to Public Transportation
statewide operations. CTDOT has direct financial responsibility for millions of dollars of transit
assets in Connecticut, but contracts out the operation of transit service to private companies. To
meet the requirements for developing a transit asset management plan, established in the final
rule on Transit Asset Management by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), CTDOT is
obligated to collect data, manage, and report on transit assets throughout the state.
As part of the rule on transit asset management, providers must develop and implement transit
asset management (TAM) plans. Transit providers may be required to either develop their own
TAM plan or participate in a group TAM plan depending on whether they are Tier I or Tier II. The
FTA rule on Transit Asset Management defines Tier I and Tier II providers:
Tier I provider means a recipient that owns, operates, or manages either (1) one hundred and one (101)
or more vehicles in revenue service during peak regular service across all fixed route modes or in any
one non-fixed route mode, or (2) rail transit.
Tier II provider means a recipient that owns, operates, or manages (1) one hundred (100) or fewer
vehicles in revenue service during peak regular service across all non-rail fixed route modes or in any
one non-fixed route mode, (2) a subrecipient under the 5311 Rural Area Formula Program, (3) or any
American Indian tribe.
States must develop a group TAM plan for Tier II transit providers, while Tier I providers must
develop their own TAM plans. Tier II providers may also choose to forgo the group plan and
develop individual plans.
A TAM plan needs to include TAM and SGR policy, TAM plan implementation strategy, an asset
inventory, condition assessments, a description of systems used to predict capital needs, a
project-based prioritization of investments, a description of key TAM activities, a list of TAM
resources, and an outline for updating the plan and TAM practices.
1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
The condition assessment must be performed at a level of detail sufficient to support capital
planning. Also, ideally, the condition assessment should support calculation of the SGR
performance measures FTA has defined for four capital assets categories: equipment (nonrevenue vehicles), rolling stock (revenue vehicles), infrastructure (rail fixed-guideway, track,
signals, and systems), and facilities. This document establishes an approach for calculating
asset condition for each of the four asset categories.
1.2 Document Organization
This guidebook is organized into five main sections:
•
Section 1 describes the background of the project and the organization of this
document.
•
Section 2 describes the inventory data and condition assessment approach for revenue
vehicles.
•
Section 3 describes the inventory data and condition assessment approach for facilities.
•
Section 4 describes the inventory data and condition assessment approach for fixed
guideway.
•
Section 5 describes the inventory data and condition assessment approach for
equipment.
•
Appendix A includes a detailed list of assessment items for Administrative and
Maintenance Facilities
•
Appendix B includes recommended inspection procedures for Administrative and
Maintenance Facilities
•
Appendix C includes a detailed list of assessment items for Passenger Facilities
•
Appendix D includes a detailed asset hierarchy for rail guideway
2
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
2.0 Revenue Vehicles
2.1 Inventory Data
Revenue vehicles are inventoried by vehicle fleet. All vehicles in a given fleet share the same
vehicle type, make/model, model year, and operator. Other inventory data collected for a fleet
may include, but is not limited to, vehicle length and fuel type. Figures 1 to 4 illustrate the asset
hierarchy for revenue vehicles. Figure 1 shows three subclasses of vehicles: bus, rail, and
ferryboat. Figure 2 shows the five vehicle types defined for buses, Figure 3 shows the six
defined for rail, and Figure 4 shows the three for ferry.
Figure 1. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles
3
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Figure 2. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Bus
Figure 3. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Rail
4
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Figure 4. Asset Hierarchy – Revenue Vehicles – Ferry
2.2 Condition Assessment Approach
The purpose of the vehicle condition assessment is to provide an overall snapshot of the current
state of repair of a vehicle fleet to aid in decisions concerning when it is most cost effective to
replace it.
FTA’s mandated SGR performance measure for revenue vehicles is the percentage of vehicles
that have met or exceed their Useful Life Benchmark (ULBs). The ULB is age at which a vehicle
has reached the end of its economic useful life. This value may be specified in terms of vehicle
age, mileage and/or other factors. FTA provides a set of default ULB values by vehicle type, all
of which are specified in terms of vehicle age.
Following FTA’s model, CTDOT uses fleet age as its indicator of vehicle condition. A vehicle is
deemed to be in good repair if its age is less than the ULB specified for the corresponding
vehicle type. Likewise, a vehicle is deemed to no longer be in good repair if its age equals or
exceeds the corresponding ULB.
CTDOT has worked with their Tier I and Tier II service providers in Connecticut to define custom
ULB values. Connecticut’s ULB values for revenue vehicles are listed in Table 1.
5
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table 1. ULB Values for Revenue Vehicles
Tier I
Tier II
Asset Class
ULB (years)
•
•
•
•
•
Transit Bus
12
Articulated Bus
12
Cutaway Bus
5
Over the Road Bus
12
Minivan
5
Rail Locomotive (Dual Power or Diesel)
25
Rail Push Pull (Coach or Cab Car)
25
Rail Electric Multiple Unit (M2 or M8 RMU)
25
Ferryboat
42
•
•
•
•
•
•
2.3 Assessment of Existing Data
Inventory data including model year (used to determine age) are stored by vehicle in CORE-CT
and in inventory registries of Connecticut transit providers including the 12 transit districts
participating in the Connecticut Group TAM Plan. For the purpose of developing its TAM Plan,
CTDOT extracted revenue vehicle data from CORE-CT and transit providers, aggregated it by
fleet, and imported the data into a separate transit asset inventory database, SGRtransdata.
6
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
3.0 Facilities
Two types of transit facilities are defined in the Connecticut SGR database: administrative/
maintenance facilities, and passenger facilities. The condition assessment approach is similar
for both facility types, and relies on visual inspection of primary facility components. However,
the specific facility components and available data differ between the two types of facilities.
Section 3.1 discusses the recommended condition assessment approach for administrative/
maintenance facilities and Section 3.2 discusses the recommended approach for passenger
facilities.
3.1 Administrative/Maintenance Facilities
3.1.1 Inventory Data
For administrative/maintenance facilities both the overall facility site and each individual building
on the site are included in the inventory. In some cases, there may be only one building on a
given site, but larger facilities may include multiple buildings.
Inventory data for the facility site may include, but is not limited to, the site address, operator
and land area. Inventory data for buildings may include, but is not limited to, the operator, floor
area, construction cost and date.
3.1.2 Condition Assessment Approach
The purpose of the facility condition assessment is to provide an overall snapshot of the current
state of repair of a facility to aid in decisions concerning capital investments to improve the
facility’s condition. This section describes how to assess the condition of an administrative/
maintenance facility.
The approach described here is based on FTA’s guidance detailed in TAM Facility Performance
Measure Reporting Guidebook: Condition Assessment Calculation. FTA’s guidance is intended
to support calculation of FTA’s mandated SGR performance measure for facilities, which is the
percentage of facilities within an asset class rated less than three on the five-point scale used in
the FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM). As described in FTA’s guidance
document, the components were established based upon American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) documents that provide standards for classification of buildings and related
features, but these have been customized in certain respects to address common features of
transit facilities.
To assess facility conditions an inspector should assign a value of 1 to 5 to each of the major
components of the facility. The condition rating values and their descriptions are listed in Table
2. The components are listed in Table 3. Specific subcomponents the inspector should examine
for each component are listed in Appendix A. The inspector may wish to assess the condition of
these individual sub-components or simply use the list as a reference when performing the
inspection. Further, when performing inspections at a sub-component level for certain subcomponents, the inspector may wish to specify the percentage of the sub-component quantity in
each condition rather than a single, overall condition. If sub-component conditions are assessed
they should be aggregated to obtain an overall score for the component using the approach
7
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
described here for aggregating component scores. Suggested inspection procedures are
included in Appendix B.
Table 2. FTA TERM Condition Assessment Scale
Rating Condition
Description
5
Excellent
No visible defects, new or near new condition, may still be under
warranty if applicable
4
Good
Good condition, but no longer new, may be slightly defective or
deteriorated, but is overall functional
3
Adequate
Moderately deteriorated or defective; but has not exceeded useful
life
2
Marginal
Defective or deteriorated in need of replacement; exceeded useful
life
1
Poor
Critically damaged or in need of immediate repair; well past useful
life
The specific components of administrative/maintenance facilities are listed below. Note that the
first nine components listed in the table should be assessed for each building in the facility, and
the final component, Site, should be assessed for the site as a whole.
Table 3. Administrative/Maintenance Facility Condition Assessment Components
Inventory Unit
Component
Building
Notes
Typical
Useful Life*
(years)
Component
Condition
Weight**
Substructure
30
1.0
Building
Shell
30
1.0
Building
Interior
30
1.0
Building
Plumbing
May need to assess
based on age
20
1.0
Building
HVAC
May need to assess
based on age
20
1.0
Building
Electrical
May need to assess
based on age
30
1.0
Building
Fire Protection
See Table 5
20
1.0
Building
Conveyance
See Table 5
20
1.0
Building
Equipment
Includes fixed
specialty equipment
30
1.0
Site
Site
50
1.0
*Useful life can be utilized for components that cannot be visually inspected.
**Component Condition Weight represents the relative importance of the component compared to other components. By default,
these numbers are 1.0. However, based on the agency’s experiences and practices, the inspector can use a different number to
lower or raise the importance of a component and thus change how component conditions impact the overall facility condition.
8
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
For some components, a visual inspection may be insufficient for establishing conditions. In
cases where the inspector finds that he or she cannot assess conditions of a component
visually, the inspector should estimate the age of the component (the time since it was
constructed or last rehabilitated), and estimate the condition based on the age using useful life
for the component listed in Table 3 with the scale shown in Table 4. Useful life is the average
amount of time in years that an item, component, or system is economically efficient to keep in
operation. This approach will typically be required for Plumbing, HVAC and Electrical, but may
also be required for other components. Refer to the discussion of rail guideway assets and
Table 7 for further details on this conversion scale.
Table 4. Conversion Scale: Component Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating
Component Age as % of
Useful Life
Rating
Condition
New
5
Excellent
< 50%
4
Good
>50% <100%
3
Adequate
>100% <125%
2
Marginal
>125%
1
Poor
For Fire Protection and Conveyance, separate inspections are typically performed to assess
code compliance. The inspector should utilize the results from those inspections in performing
their condition assessment. Specifically, the inspector should use the condition assessment
scale shown in Table 5 for these components.
Table 5. Fire Protection and Conveyance Condition Assessment Scale
Rating Condition
Description
5
Excellent
System is new and there are no identified code issues
4
Good
System is not new, but there are no identified code issues
3
Adequate
Isolated code issues exist that can be addressed through
maintenance
2
Marginal
Code issues exist that do not necessitate facility closure
1
Poor
Extensive code issues have been identified that may necessitate
facility closure
Given the individual component conditions, the overall condition of the facility is calculated as:
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =
∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖 𝑓𝑖 𝑟𝑖
∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑓𝑖 𝑟𝑖
where ci is the condition of component i, fi is the replacement cost factor listed in Table 3, and ri
is the replacement cost of the component.
9
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
3.1.3 Assessment of Existing Data
Inventory data on Connecticut facilities are stored in CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset
registries, but the level of detail stored on each facility varies. Thus, for the purpose of
developing its TAM Plan, CTDOT extracted data on administrative/maintenance facilities from
CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset registries, then manually reviewed data for each
facility. Except in the case of a selected Tier II facilities that have been recently inspected,
component-level condition data are not available for administrative/maintenance facilities.
However, the overall condition of CTDOT-owned facilities has been previously established.
Thus, component-level conditions were manually determined for each facility using the available
component-level data, overall facility condition, and facility age. Data for each facility and
building were imported into the transit asset inventory database, SGRtransdata.
3.2 Passenger Facilities
3.2.1 Inventory Data
For passengers facilities the overall facility site, each individual building on the site, and each
rail platform (if applicable) are included in the inventory. In some cases, there may be only one
building and/or platform on a given site, but larger facilities may include multiple buildings and/or
platforms.
Inventory data for the facility site may include, but is not limited to, the site address, operator
and land area. Inventory data for buildings may include, but is not limited to, the operator, floor
area, parking spaces (for parking lots), construction cost and date.
3.2.2 Condition Assessment Approach
The condition assessment approach for passenger facilities is similar to that for
administrative/maintenance facilities. The approach described here is based on FTA’s guidance
detailed in TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting Guidebook: Condition Assessment
Calculation. FTA’s guidance is intended to support calculation of FTA’s mandated SGR
performance measure for facilities, which is the percentage of facilities within an asset class
rated less than three on the five-point TERM scale.
To assess facility conditions an inspector should assign a value of 1 to 5 to each of the major
components of the facility. The condition rating values and their descriptions are listed in Table
2. The components are listed in Table 6. Specific subcomponents the inspector should examine
for each component are listed in Appendix C. The inspector may wish to assess the condition of
these individual sub-components or simply use the list as a reference when performing the
inspection. Further, when performing inspections at a sub-component level, for certain subcomponents the inspector may wish to specify the percentage of the sub-component quantity in
each condition rather than a single, overall condition. If sub-component conditions are assessed
they should be aggregated to obtain an overall score for the component using the approach
described here for aggregating component scores. Suggested inspection procedures are
included in Appendix B.
Regarding the specific components of passenger facilities, note that first nine listed in the table
10
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
below should be assessed for each building in the facility. Three components should be
assessed for each platform, and Site should be assessed for the site as a whole.
Table 6. Passenger Facility Condition Assessment Components
Inventory Unit
Component
Building
Notes
Typical
Useful Life
(years)*
Component
Condition
Weight**
Substructure
30
1.0
Building
Shell
30
1.0
Building
Interior
30
1.0
Building
Plumbing
May need to
assess based on
age
20
1.0
Building
HVAC
May need to
assess based on
age
20
1.0
Building
Electrical
May need to
assess based on
age
30
1.0
Building
Fire Protection
See Table 5
20
1.0
Building
Conveyance
See Table 5
20
1.0
Building
Fare Collection
20
1.0
Platform
Structure
30
1.0
Platform
Canopy
30
1.0
Platform
Electrical
30
1.0
Site
Site
50
1.0
*Useful life can be utilized for components that cannot be visually inspected.
**Component Condition Weight represents the relative importance of the component compared to other components. By default,
these numbers are 1.0. However, based on the agency’s experiences and practices, the inspector can use a different number to
lower or raise the importance of a component and thus change how component conditions impact the overall facility condition.
The other details of the assessment process are identical to that described previously for
administrative/maintenance facilities. Table 4 lists rating values to use if the inspector uses age
as a proxy for condition. Table 5 lists specific condition assessment language to use for fire
protection and conveyance. Given the individual component conditions, the overall condition of
the facility is calculated as:
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =
∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑐𝑖 𝑓𝑖 𝑟𝑖
∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑓𝑖 𝑟𝑖
where ci is the condition of component i, fi is the replacement cost factor listed in Table 6, and ri
is the replacement cost of the component.
11
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
3.2.3 Assessment of Existing Data
Inventory data on Connecticut facilities are stored in CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset
registries, but the level of detail stored on each facility varies. Thus, for the purpose of
developing its TAM Plan, CTDOT extracted data on passenger facilities from CORE-CT and the
transit providers’ asset registries, and then manually reviewed data for each facility to establish
the inventory. Data for each facility, platform and building were imported into the transit asset
inventory database, SGRtransdata.
Existing condition data available for passenger facilities varied by specific type of facility. For
Tier II facilities and for CTfastrak stations, an overall condition rating was assigned. For these
facilities, component-level conditions were manually determined for each facility using the
overall facility condition and facility age.
For rail stations, more detailed assessments were recently performed. These inspections were
performed for different facility components using the 10-point National Bridge Inventory (NBI)
condition scale (with values ranging from 0 to 4) rather than the 5-point TERM scale described
here. NBI conditions were converted to the TERM scale by dividing the rating by 2 and then
rounding to the nearest integer value. Thus, a component was deemed to have a TERM rating
of 2 if its NBI rating was 5 (fair) or less.
The rail facility inspections were mapped to component conditions as follows:
•
The condition for Substructure was established based on the value for Foundations.
•
The condition for Shell was established based on the minimum of Roof and Exterior
Walls.
•
The condition for Interior was established based on the minimum of Interior Walls,
Floors, Windows/Skylights/Doors, Stairs/Ramps and Walking Surfaces.
•
The condition for Plumbing was established based on the minimum of the two ratings for
Drainage and the rating for Restrooms.
•
The condition for HVAC was established based on the minimum of HVAC, Duct Work,
Compressors, and Blowers.
•
The condition for Conveyance was established based on the minimum of Elevator Pit,
Elevator Machine Room, Elevator Cab, and Escalator.
• The condition for Site was established based on the value for Site-Electrical.
For rail platforms, the condition was determined for the components Structure, Canopy and
Electrical. For each of these the condition was determined by taking the minimum of the
subcomponent ratings.
The station data included information on station bridges, but this was considered to be part of
the data set of Fixed Guideway – Structures.
12
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
4.0 Fixed Guideway
Two types of fixed guideway are defined in the Connecticut SGR database: rail, and bus. Rail
guideway includes the Connecticut-owned portion of the Northeast Corridor, as well as three
branch lines: New Canaan, Danbury and Waterbury. The inventory is structured such that
additional freight rail guideway and related assets may be added if desired. Bus guideway
includes the pavement, bridges and ancillary assets associated with the CTfastrak guideway
running from New Britain to Hartford. Section 4.1 discusses the recommended condition
assessment approach for rail guideway and Section 4.2 discusses the recommended approach
for bus guideway.
4.1 Rail
4.1.1 Inventory Data
Rail fixed guideway inventory data is organized into four primary categories: track, power,
structure, and signals/communications, as depicted in Figure 5. Each of these four categories is
further divided into a two-level hierarchy. Note the hierarchy is based on that recommended by
Metro North Railroad (MNR) based on that agency’s work to implement a new enterprise asset
management system. The rail guideway asset hierarchy is presented in detail in Appendix D.
Figure 5. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail
Figure 6 shows the hierarchy for Track. Track is classified Main or Special. Main track is further
divided into five subcategories, and special track is further divided into two subcategories. Track
is inventoried by segment.
Figure 7 shows the hierarchy for Power. Power is divided into four subcategories: Supply
System Traction Power; Supply System Transmission Power; Traction Power Distribution; and
Signal Power System. Each of these is further divided into four subcategories. Assets in the
subcategories Supply System Traction Power, Supply System Transmission Power, and Signal
13
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Power System are inventoried by site (e.g., by substation). Traction Power Distribution is
inventoried by track segment.
Figure 8 shows the hierarchy for Structures. Three basic categories of structures are defined:
Undergrade Structure; Retaining Wall and Overhead Structure. Each of these is further
subdivided into two or three subcategories. Each individual structure is included in the inventory.
Figure 9 shows the inventory for Signals/Communications. This subcategory is further divided
into the following: Signaling; Train Detection Control; Communication/Monitoring; Security
System; and Positive Train Control. Assets in this subcategory are inventoried by piece of
equipment.
Figure 6. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Track
14
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Figure 7. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Power
Figure 8. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Structure
15
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Figure 9. Asset Hierarchy – Fixed Guideway – Rail – Signal/Communications
4.1.2 Condition Assessment Approach
MNR and Amtrak have each identified a need for a comprehensive condition assessment
approach for assessing rail guideway on the Northeast Corridor. Such an approach would
ideally consider results of visual inspections, including track walks and other forms of inspection
already performed on a routine basis, results obtained from inspection by rail geometry car, and
other inputs. However, no such comprehensive approach has yet been defined. Thus, both
MNR and Amtrak use asset age as a proxy for condition for most assets, with the notable
exception of structures.
For all rail guideway assets other than structures, CTDOT assesses condition based on asset
age, using an approach patterned on current MNR and Amtrak practices. For each asset type a
ULB value is specified in years. Asset condition is then approximated by comparing the age of
the asset (years since it was either constructed or last rehabilitated) to the ULB. A condition
rating is assigned on the five-point TERM scale based on Table 7.
As described below in 4.1.3, MNR rail guideway asset data has four condition categories, each
defined by age relative to useful life. CTDOT adapted this approach and added a fifth condition
category (New/5/Excellent) to allow for mapping of MNR condition data to the TERM five-point
scale.
16
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table 7. Conversion Scale: Rail Guideway Asset Age to FTA TERM Condition Rating
Asset Age as % of ULB
Rating
Condition
New
5
Excellent
< 50%
4
Good
>50% and <100%
3
Adequate
>100% and <125%
2
Marginal
>125%
1
Poor
ULB values for rail guideway assets are discussed in Section 4.1.3.
For structures a detailed assessment approach has already been defined and implemented.
CTDOT performs visual inspections of structures in the subcategories Undergrade Structure
and Overhead Structure. These are patterned on the approach used for highway bridges.
Through the inspection CTDOT assess condition of the bridge deck, superstructure and
substructure condition using the 10-point National Bridge Inventory (NBI) condition scale (with
values ranging from 0 to 4) rather than the 5-point TERM scale described here. For culverts a
single overall culvert rating is specified.
4.1.3 Assessment of Existing Data
Pending implementation by MNR of its new enterprise asset management system, the system
of record for data on the rail guideway inventory is the set of track charts maintained for the
Northeast Corridor and branch lines. The charts show locations of major assets, and detail
when assets were most recently rehabilitated. However, the track charts do not provide the level
of detail required to populate the asset inventory illustrated in Figures 6 to 9.
As a supplement to the track charts, MNR maintains a less detailed, summary inventory of rail
guideway assets for use in preparation of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Ten
Year Needs Assessment (TYNA). This summary inventory groups assets by ULB, and details
the asset quantities in each of four condition categories:
•
1: 0 to 50 percent of useful life (4 or 5 on the TERM scale)
•
2: 50 to 100 percent of useful life (3 on the TERM scale)
•
3: 100 to 125 percent of useful life (2 on the TERM scale)
• 4: more than 125 percent of useful life (1 on the TERM scale)
Based on the above definitions, an asset in Category 3 or 4 (1 or 2 on the TERM scale) has
exceeded its useful life and is not in good repair. However, in some cases MNR has established
that an asset is still in good repair, despite exceeding its useful life, or alternatively, that it is no
longer in good repair though it is still less than its useful life. To address such situations MNR
tracks assets in a second set of categories that mirror the first set, but include adjustments for
engineering judgment.
The MNR data were used to populate data on Track and Power in the CTDOT database. Table
8 summarizes the assets in the summary inventory for Track. Table 9 summarizes the assets
for Power.
17
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table 8. MNR TYNA Summary Inventory - Rail
Category
Subcategory
Rail
Tangent
40
Curves <2 degrees
30
Curves 2-4 degrees
20
Curves >4 degrees
10
Concrete
40
Wood
30
High Speed
25
Mainline
20
Yard
30
Siding
30
Interlockings
4
Control Point to Control Point
4
Ties
Turnouts
Surfacing
ULB (years)
Table 9. MNR TYNA Summary Inventory - Power
Category
Subcategory
Catenary Plant
Overhead Catenary
50
Sectionalizing Insulators
3
Synthetic Insulators
3
Pulleys
15
AC Feeder Cable
40
Signal Power 12kV
50
Catenary Poles
100
Metal Clad
30
RTU Sectionalizing
30
Substation Wayside Switchyard
30
Anchor Bridge Substation
30
Snow Melter Transformers/Unit Substation
30
Supply Stations
40
MOD’s
20
Substations
20
MOD’s
20
Transformers
30
Transformers, Small Pad Mount
40
Yard Power Distribution System
30
Cable Plant
AC Substation Plant
Signal Power Plant
Transmission Plant
ULB (years)
18
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
CTDOT’s existing structures data were used to populate the data for the category Structure.
Condition data in the existing data set are expressed using the 10-point NBI scale. NBI
conditions were converted to the TERM scale by dividing the rating by 2 and then rounding to
the nearest integer value. Thus, a component was deemed to have a TERM rating of 2 if its NBI
rating was 4 (poor) or less.
For the category Signals work remains to be performed to develop a full inventory. Thus, for this
category the CTDOT inventory has entries for the Northeast Corridor, New Canaan Branch,
Danbury Branch, and Waterbury Branch.
4.2 Bus
4.2.1 Inventory Data
Asset categories defined for Bus Fixed Guideway include Pavement and Structure. CTDOT’s
approach for inventorying these assets is to extend the approach used for highway assets, for
which existing systems and approaches are well defined.
4.2.2 Condition Assessment Approach
For pavement CTDOT uses a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to measure the condition of
CTDOT-maintained pavements. PCI is calculated for each 0.1-mile segment based on five
metrics. The overall PCI is a weighted average of the following metrics shown in Table 10
below.
Table 10. Pavement Condition Index Metrics
Metric
Weight
Description
Roughness
10%
An indicator of pavement roughness experienced by road users
traveling over the pavements. The International Roughness Index
(IRI) is computed from a single longitudinal profile
Rutting
15%
Rutting is quantified for asphalt pavements by measuring the depth
of ruts along the wheel path. Rutting is commonly caused by a
combination of high traffic volumes, heavy vehicles and the
instability of the pavement mix.
Cracking
25%
Cracks in the pavement surface can be caused or accelerated by
aging, loading, poor drainage, frost heaves or temperature changes,
or construction flaws. Cracking is measured in terms of the
percentage of cracked pavement surface.
Disintegration
30%
Disintegration is the wearing away of the pavement surface caused
by the dislodging of aggregate particles and loss of asphalt binder.
CTDOT calculates the disintegration metric using pavement age.
Drainage
20%
Drainage refers to the ability of the surface of the roadway to drain.
CTDOT uses the collected cross slope and grade of the roadway to
compute the drainage metric
The PCI is scaled from 1.0 to 9.0, with 9.0 describing a pavement without defects. Within this
19
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
scale, roadways with a PCI less than 4.0 are classified in “Poor” condition, those between 4.0
and less than 6.0 are in “Fair” condition, 6.0 to less than 8.0 PCI indicates “Good” condition, and
8.0 to 9.0 indicates “Excellent” condition. A pavement section for which the PCI is 6 or greater is
classified as being in a state of good repair.
For structures CTDOT uses a similar approach for rail and highway bridges. As described
previously, bridges are inspected visually. Conditions of bridge decks, superstructures and
substructures are assessed using the 10-point NBI scale.
4.2.3 Assessment of Existing Data
CTDOT collects pavement inventory and condition data using specially equipped Fugro
Roadware Automatic Road Analyzer (ARAN) vans. The entire CTDOT-maintained mainline is
measured each year. CTDOT performed an initial data collection run of CTfastrak guideway in
March 2015, prior to the system opening. CTDOT is establishing a process for regular data
collection, data processing, and integration with the Pavement Management System.
CTDOT has already inventoried and inspected the bridges on the CTfastrak guideway and is
managing these together with other highway bridges.
20
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
5.0 Equipment
5.1 Inventory Data
The Equipment asset class includes service vehicles and other equipment with a value of
$50,000 or more. Service vehicles are inventoried by vehicle fleet. All vehicles in a given fleet
share the same vehicle type, make/model, model year, and operator. Figure 10 shows the
different types of service vehicles inventoried, including four types of “rubber tire” vehicles and
two types of rail service vehicles.
Figure 10. Asset Hierarchy – Equipment – Service Vehicles
Other equipment is inventoried by specific item. Inventory data include, but are not limited to,
item descriptions, purchase cost, and purchase date.
5.2 Condition Assessment Approach
CTDOT uses the same basic approach for assessing condition of equipment as it does for
revenue vehicles. This approach is discussed in Section 2. Specifically, A ULB value is
established for equipment type. A piece of equipment is assessed as being in good repair if its
age is less than the corresponding ULB, and not in good repair if it meets or exceeds the ULB.
This approach supports reporting of FTA’s mandated SGR performance measure for
equipment: the percentage of service vehicles that have met or exceed their ULB. Connecticut’s
ULBs for equipment are listed in Table 11.
21
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table 11. ULBs for Equipment
Tier I
Tier II
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Asset Class
ULB (years)
Trucks and Rubber Tire Vehicles
14
Automobiles
5
Sport Utility Vehicles
5
Steel Wheel Vehicles
25
Vans
5
5.3 Assessment of Existing Data
Inventory data including model year (used to determine age) are stored by service vehicle in
CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset registries. For the purpose of developing its TAM
Plan, CTDOT extracted revenue vehicle data from CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset
registries, aggregated it by fleet, and imported the data into a separate transit asset inventory
database, SGRtransdata.
For other equipment inventory data, such as equipment description, purchase cost, and
purchase date, are stored in CORE-CT and the transit providers’ asset registries as well.
CTDOT extracted data on other equipment, filtering out data for items costing less than $50,000
or permanently affixed to a facility, and imported the data into SGRtransdata.
22
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Appendix A. Detailed List of Items for Admin / Maintenance
Facility Condition Assessment
Tables A-1 through A-10 present detailed lists of items for condition assessment at
administration or maintenance facilities. The tables are organized by the ten components
described in the approach. In addition to the items, the tables include notes for inspection
(where applicable) and units of measure. This information in this appendix is also included in a
separate spreadsheet.
Where these items are assessed, one would typically assign an overall value to the item. But in
cases where units of measures are not “inspect as each”, an inspector may determine the
percentage of total quantity in each condition.
Table A-1. Substructure
Category
Foundations
Basement
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Exposed Foundation Elements
inspect as each
Other Structural Components
inspect as each
Slab
sq. ft.
Table A-2. Shell
Category
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Superstructure
Structural Frame
Columns, pillars, walls
inspect as each
Roof Waterproofing
Roof
Exterior
Roof Penetration Flashing Systems
Roof Drainage Systems
Building Envelope - Masonry/Concrete
Walls
Building Envelope - Cladding
Building Envelope - Windows and
Glazing
Building Envelope - Doors, Glazing, Door
Hardware
Building Envelope - Garage Doors
Building
Expansion
Joints
Chimney, skylights,
eaves, surroundings
inspect as each
Gutters
inspect as each
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Bird Proofing System
inspect as each
Exterior Finishes
inspect as each
Means of Egress
Shell
Appurtenances
inspect as each
Stairs, fire escapes
inspect as each
Vertical Openings
inspect as each
Cat Walks
inspect as each
Inspection Pits
inspect as each
Building Expansion Joints
linear ft.
A-1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-3. Interior
Category
Partitions
Stairs
Finishes
Other
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Interior Walls
sq. ft.
Interior Windows and Glazing
sq. ft.
Interior Doors, Glazing, Door Hardware
sq. ft.
Interior Stairs and Landings
units
Flooring System
sq. ft.
Ceiling System
sq. ft.
Wall Finishes
sq. ft.
Interior Amenities
Signage, built-in
furnishings, appliances
Built-In Seating
inspect as each
inspect as each
Table A-4. Plumbing
Category
Domestic Water
Distribution
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Water Heaters
inspect as each
Water Treatment Systems
inspect as each
Backflow Prevention
inspect as each
Pumps
Pumps
Bathroom
Fixtures
Bathroom Fixtures
Other Plumbing
Items / Fixtures
Other Plumbing Fixtures
Sump, well, domestic
inspect as each
inspect as each
Piping, insulation, etc.
inspect as each
A-2
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-5. HVAC
Category
Item
Unit of Measure
units
Heat Pumps
units
Make-Up Units
units
Air Handling Units
units
Boilers
units
Burners
units
Furnaces
units
Unit Heaters
units
Radiant Heaters
units
Finned Tube Radiation and Convertors
units
Air Conditioning Units
HVAC
Notes
Energy Recovery Units
Split package,
commercial through-thewall, water-cooled
package
units
Splits and Mini-Splits
units
Cooling Towers
units
Condensers
Air-Cooled, evaporative
units
Chillers
units
HVAC Air Terminals
units
Fans
Centrifugal, axial, roofmounted, propeller
units
Coils
units
Heat Exchangers
units
Reciprocating Compressors
units
Air Curtains
units
Water Treatment System
Other HVAC Pumps (excluding heat
pumps)
Other HVAC Components
inspect as each
inspect as each
Piping, ductwork, etc.
inspect as each
A-3
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-6. Electrical
Category
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Power Distribution / Switchgear
Service entrance through
subpanels
inspect as each
Generator and Transfer Switch
Electrical
Service /
Distribution
Backup Power
Lighting
Transformers
DC Power Substation / Traction Power
Substation
AC Power Substation
inspect as each
Non-utility owned only
inspect as each
inspect as each
inspect as each
Service Panels
inspect as each
Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)
inspect as each
Interior Lighting
inspect as each
Exterior Lighting
inspect as each
Other Electrical
Other Electrical Components
Lightning
Protection
System
Lightning Protection System
Conduits, etc.
inspect as each
inspect as each
Table A-7. Fire Protection
Category
Item
Notes
Fire Detection System
Fire Protection
Fire Suppression Systems
Unit of Measure
inspect as each
Sprinklers, standpipes,
extinguishers, hydrants
inspect as each
Notes
Unit of Measure
Table A-8. Conveyance
Category
Item
Elevators
Elevators
units
Escalators
Escalators
units
Lifts
Passenger Lifts
units
A-4
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-9. Equipment
Category
Item
Unit of Measure
inspect as each
Photovoltaic Panels
inspect as each
Paint Booths
inspect as each
Air Compressors
inspect as each
Special Work Station Ventilation
Stationary
Equipment
Notes
Hydrogen Fuel Cells
Vehicle, welding,
soldering, etc.
inspect as each
Vehicle Washing Equipment
inspect as each
Fall Protection Systems
inspect as each
Rail Car Wash
inspect as each
Sand Blasting System
inspect as each
Radio Cell Towers
inspect as each
In-Ground Lifts
inspect as each
Other Stationary Equipment
inspect as each
A-5
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table A-10. Site
Category
Item
units
units
Fuel Oil Tank
units
Potable Water Tank
units
Propane Tank
units
Generator Tank
Security
Site Septic,
Environmental,
& Stormwater
Management
Unit of Measure
Tank Monitoring System
Site Equipment
Roads / Parking
Lots / Sidewalk /
Curbing
Notes
Motor Fuel Island Tanks and FMU
Independent from
generator, i.e. not a base
tank
units
Chloride and Brine Storage Tanks
units
Chloride System
inspect as each
Brine System
inspect as each
Access Road
sq. ft.
Parking Lots
sq. ft.
Sidewalks and Walkways
sq. ft.
Pavement Markings
inspect as each
Bollards and Handrails
inspect as each
Fences
linear ft.
Gates and Barrier Arms
inspect as each
Camera / Surveillance System
inspect as each
Guard Shack
inspect as each
Waste Oil Tank
units
Waste Antifreeze Tank
units
Wastewater Management / Drainage
inspect as each
Oil-Water Separator Tank
units
Sanitary/Stormwater Pumping Systems
inspect as each
Septic System Tank
units
Septic System Leaching Fields or
Cesspools
Septic System Reserve Field
inspect as each
inspect as each
A-6
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
For each of the items listed in Tables A-1 through A-10, an inspector may fill out the following
“Yes/No” questions shown in Table A-11. These items were added following discussions with
CTDOT and transit provider staff but are not directly applicable to the condition assessment
ratings.
Using these questions could help an agency understand the importance of each asset while
considering capital planning needs. The determination of safety critical, operations critical or the
other fields could be initially made by the manager of the department in which the assets reside.
The determination could then be reviewed and approved by Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (who keeps the inventory).
An agency using these questions may want to establish further criteria for these items.
Table A-11. Yes/No Questions
Question
Description
Applicable?
Does the item exist at the facility / building? If it does, then
answer Yes. If it does not, answer No.
Safety Critical?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight safety critical
components.
Operations Critical?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight operations critical
components.
Obsolete / Modernization?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight obsolete
components.
Operating Savings Opportunity?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight operating savings
opportunities.
Additional questions for an inspector to consider are listed below in Table A-12.
Table A-12. Additional Questions
Additional Questions
Is there adequate office space?
Is a break area provided?
Are male and female locker rooms and showers provided?
Is the facility ADA compliant?
Is the facility OSHA compliant?
Does a communications (data) system exist?
Does a phone system exist?
A-7
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Appendix B. Recommended Inspection Procedures for
Administrative and Maintenance Facilities
Facility condition assessment involves visual inspection of facility components to determine
asset condition. This appendix includes recommended inspection procedures for administrative
and maintenance facilities, organized by component and listed in Table B-1. These procedures
are adapted from FTA’s guidance document TAM Facility Performance Measure Reporting
Guidebook: Condition Assessment Calculation.
Table B-1. Recommendation Facility Inspection Procedures
Component
Procedures
Substructure
•
Foundations: Inspect walls, columns, pilings, other structural
elements for signs of decay or structural integrity concerns.
•
Basement: Inspect non-foundation and structural elements
such as facing materials, insulation, slab, floor underpinnings,
crawl spaces, etc.
•
Inspect roof, including roof surface (tiles, membrane, shingles,
gravel etc.), gutters, eaves, skylights, flashing, chimney
surrounds, and sealants, hardware and painted or coated
surfaces. Note evidence of ponding, or roof leaks, significant
age – and other indicators that repair may be necessary. Note
age of roof(s) and whether warranty is still in effect.
•
Inspect building envelope, façade, curtain wall system, glazing
system, exterior sealants, exterior balconies, doors, stairways,
and parapets. Note signs of cracks, openings, missing
elements, detached elements, deteriorated sealants, and
other issues that may lead to penetration of water into the
building. Also, not any concerns with structural integrity.
•
Inspect fire escapes, noting any loose connections,
deteriorated elements, or blockage, that would impact the
function or safety of fire escapes.
•
Inspect gutters and downspouts. Note maintenance needs,
need for cleaning, loose elements, and detachment.
•
Inspect superstructure / structural frame, including columns,
pillars, and walls. Note any signs of decay or structural
integrity concerns.
•
Inspect windows, doors, and all finishes (paint, masonry).
Note any functionality or safety issues.
•
Inspect soundness and finish of drywall, partitions, interior
doors, fittings, ceiling tiles, and signage.
•
Inspect stairs including fire and access issues.
•
Inspect interior finishes, including materials used on walls,
floors, and ceilings, such as tile, paint, and other coatings. Look
for roughness and damage.
•
Inspect fixtures and pipes for water distribution, sanitary waste,
rainwater drainage, and any damage or leaks.
•
If not accessible, determine or estimate the age of plumbing
system.
Shell (e.g., roof, exterior structure, walls)
Interior
Plumbing
B-1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
HVAC
•
Inspect systems and their elements for energy supply, heating
and cooling systems, distribution systems, terminal and
package units, controls and instrumentation including testing
and balancing, and chimneys. Specifically, inspect coils,
housing, drains, and wiring and evaluate overall performance
of the system.
•
Note apparent or reported age of the equipment, past material
element replacements/ upgrades, and the apparent level of
maintenance exercised. If heating equipment is shut down or
not operational at the time of the walk-through survey, provide
an opinion of the condition to the extent observed. Note
refrigerants and fuels used and their suitability or need for
improvement / upgrade.
•
If elements are not accessible, determine or estimate the age
of the HVAC system.
•
Inspect electrical service & distribution, noting deficiencies or
needed / recommended upgrades
•
Inspect lighting and branch wiring (interior and exterior),
communications and security, noting deficiencies or needed /
recommended upgrades
•
Examine other electrical system-related pieces such as
lightning protection, generators, emergency lighting, and
elements related to electrical service and distribution such as
conduit, boxes, solar panels and mountings for any damage
wire chaffing or loose or corroded connections. Evaluate
overall performance of the system.
•
If elements are not accessible, determine or estimate the age
of the electrical system.
Fire Protection
•
Inspect sprinklers, standpipes, hydrants, fire alarms,
emergency lighting, smoke evacuation, stairwell
pressurization, and any other specialized elements relating to
overall protection system and code compliance.
Conveyance (e.g., elevators, escalators,
wheelchair lifts)
•
Inspect condition, function, and code compliance of elevators,
escalators, lifts, and any other fixed apparatuses for the
movement of goods or people.
Equipment (e.g., lifts, washing systems)
•
Inspect equipment, noting age, condition, and functional
deficiencies or safety issues.
Site (e.g., sidewalks, parking lot, grounds)
•
Inspect roadways/driveways and associated signage,
markings, and equipment. Look for cracking or settling of the
concrete or asphalt.
•
Inspect parking lots and associated signage, markings, and
equipment. Look for cracking or settling of the concrete or
asphalt
•
Inspect pedestrian areas and associated signage, markings,
and equipment. Inspect the curbing and ramps for cracking,
settling, holes, uneven surfaces and trip hazards. Pay special
attention to wheelchair ramp areas and other ADA / access
considerations
•
Site development such as fences, walls, and miscellaneous
structures. Look for corrosion, structural integrity and
condition of paint.
Electrical
B-2
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
•
Landscaping, Site Utilities: Look for signs of drainage
problems such as flooded areas, eroded soil and water
damage to the asphalt and clogged storm drain inlets.
•
Visually inspect the irrigation system, if installed. Look for
signs of leaks, such as sagging areas in grass and/or pooling
water. Look for dead spots in the grass which would indicate
lack of water possibly caused by a mechanical failure.
B-3
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Appendix C. Detailed List of Items for Passenger Facility
Condition Assessment
Tables C-1 through C-10 present detailed lists of items for condition assessment at passenger
facilities. The tables are organized by the eleven components described in the approach. In
addition to the items, the tables include notes for inspection (where applicable) and units of
measure.
This information in this appendix is also included in a separate spreadsheet.
Table C-1. Substructure
Category
Foundations
Basement
Item
Notes
Exposed
Foundation
Elements
Other
Structural
Components
Slab
Unit of Measure
inspect as each
inspect as each
sq. ft.
Table C-2. Shell
Category
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Superstructure
Structural Frame
Columns, pillars, walls
inspect as each
Roof Waterproofing
Roof
Exterior
Roof Penetration Flashing Systems
Roof Drainage Systems
Building Envelope - Masonry/Concrete
Walls
Building Envelope - Cladding
Building Envelope - Windows and
Glazing
Building Envelope - Doors, Glazing, Door
Hardware
Building Envelope - Garage Doors
Building
Expansion
Joints
Chimney, skylights,
eaves, surroundings
inspect as each
Gutters
inspect as each
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Bird Proofing System
inspect as each
Exterior Finishes
inspect as each
Means of Egress
Shell
Appurtenances
inspect as each
Stairs, fire escapes
inspect as each
Vertical Openings
inspect as each
Cat Walks
inspect as each
Building Expansion Joints
linear ft.
C-1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table C-3. Interior
Category
Partitions
Stairs
Finishes
Other
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Interior Walls
sq. ft.
Interior Windows and Glazing
sq. ft.
Interior Doors, Glazing, Door Hardware
sq. ft.
Interior Stairs and Landings
units
Flooring System
sq. ft.
Ceiling System
sq. ft.
Wall Finishes
sq. ft.
Interior Amenities
Signage, built-in
furnishings, appliances
Built-In Seating
inspect as each
inspect as each
Table C-4. Plumbing
Category
Domestic Water
Distribution
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Water Heaters
inspect as each
Water Treatment Systems
inspect as each
Backflow Prevention
inspect as each
Pumps
Pumps
Bathroom
Fixtures
Bathroom Fixtures
Other Plumbing
Items / Fixtures
Other Plumbing Fixtures
Sump, well, domestic
inspect as each
inspect as each
Piping, insulation, etc.
inspect as each
C-2
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table C-5. HVAC
Category
Item
Unit of Measure
units
Heat Pumps
units
Make-Up Units
units
Air Handling Units
units
Boilers
units
Burners
units
Furnaces
units
Unit Heaters
units
Radiant Heaters
units
Finned Tube Radiation and Convertors
units
Air Conditioning Units
HVAC
Notes
Energy Recovery Units
Split package,
commercial through-thewall, water-cooled
package
units
Splits and Mini-Splits
units
Cooling Towers
units
Condensers
Air-Cooled, evaporative
units
Chillers
units
HVAC Air Terminals
units
Fans
Centrifugal, axial, roofmounted, propeller
units
Coils
units
Heat Exchangers
units
Reciprocating Compressors
units
Air Curtains
units
Water Treatment System
Other HVAC Pumps (excluding heat
pumps)
Other HVAC Components
inspect as each
inspect as each
Piping, ductwork, etc.
inspect as each
C-3
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table C-6. Electrical
Category
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Power Distribution / Switchgear
Service entrance through
subpanels
inspect as each
Generator and Transfer Switch
Electrical
Service /
Distribution
Backup Power
Lighting
Transformers
DC Power Substation / Traction Power
Substation
AC Power Substation
inspect as each
Non-utility owned only
inspect as each
inspect as each
inspect as each
Service Panels
inspect as each
Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)
inspect as each
Interior Lighting
inspect as each
Exterior Lighting
inspect as each
Other Electrical
Other Electrical Components
Lightning
Protection
System
Lightning Protection System
Conduits, etc.
inspect as each
inspect as each
Table C-7. Fire Protection
Category
Item
Notes
Fire Detection System
Fire Protection
Fire Suppression Systems
Unit of Measure
inspect as each
Sprinklers, standpipes,
extinguishers, hydrants
inspect as each
Notes
Unit of Measure
Table C-8. Conveyance
Category
Item
Elevators
Elevators
units
Escalators
Escalators
units
C-4
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table C-9. Fare Collection
Category
Fare Collection
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Turnstiles
units
Ticket Machines
units
Other Fare Collection Items
inspect as each
Table C-10. Platform
Category
Structure
Canopy (Deck)
Electrical
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Overlay
inspect as each
Double Tee
inspect as each
Joints
inspect as each
Bearings
inspect as each
Footing
inspect as each
Rail Post Foundation
inspect as each
Rail Post Connection
inspect as each
Railing Connection
inspect as each
Paint/Coatings
inspect as each
Stairs/Ramps
inspect as each
Other
inspect as each
Columns
inspect as each
Structural Connections
inspect as each
Roof Framing Elements
inspect as each
Roof Decking
inspect as each
Drainage System
inspect as each
Skylights
inspect as each
Electrical Connections
inspect as each
Non-Electrical Connections
inspect as each
Snow Guards
inspect as each
Column Footings
inspect as each
Emergency Lighting
inspect as each
Platform Lighting
inspect as each
Grounding
inspect as each
PA System
inspect as each
PIDS System
inspect as each
VMS Signs
inspect as each
C-5
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Table C-11. Site
Category
Roads / Parking
Lots / Sidewalk /
Curbing
Security
Site Septic,
Environmental,
& Stormwater
Management
Item
Notes
Unit of Measure
Access Road
sq. ft.
Parking Lots
sq. ft.
Sidewalks and Walkways
sq. ft.
Pavement Markings
inspect as each
Bollards and Handrails
inspect as each
Fences
linear ft.
Gates and Barrier Arms
inspect as each
Camera / Surveillance System
inspect as each
Guard Shack
inspect as each
Wastewater Management / Drainage
inspect as each
Oil-Water Separator Tank
units
Sanitary/Stormwater Pumping Systems
inspect as each
Septic System Tank
Septic System Leaching Fields or
Cesspools
Septic System Reserve Field
units
inspect as each
inspect as each
C-6
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
For each of the items listed in Tables C-1 through C-11, an inspector may consider the following
questions shown in Table C-12.
These items were added following discussions with CTDOT and transit provider staff but are not
directly applicable to the condition assessment ratings.
Using these questions could help an agency understand the importance of each asset while
considering capital planning needs. The determination of safety critical, operations critical or the
other fields could be initially made by the manager of the department in which the assets reside.
The determination could then be reviewed and approved by Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (who keeps the inventory).
An agency using these questions may want to establish further criteria for these items.
Table C-12. Yes/No Questions
Question
Description
Applicable?
Does the item exist at the facility / building? If it does, then
answer Yes. If it does not, answer No.
Safety Critical?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight safety critical
components.
Operations Critical?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight operations critical
components.
Obsolete / Modernization?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight obsolete
components.
Operating Savings Opportunity?
A “Yes/No” question intended to highlight operating savings
opportunities.
Additional questions concerning the entire facility for an inspector to consider are listed below in
Table C-13.
Table C-13. Additional Questions
Additional Questions
Is there adequate office space?
Is a break area provided?
Are male and female locker rooms and showers provided?
Is the facility ADA compliant?
Is the facility OSHA compliant?
Does a communications (data) system exist?
Does a phone system exist?
C-7
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Appendix D. Detailed Rail Guideway Asset Hierarchy
CTDOT organizes transit assets according to an asset hierarchy. One of the four top-level
categories of the hierarchy is fixed guideway, which is divided into rail and bus assets at the
second level. The rail guideway hierarchy is further broken down in three additional levels,
presented below in Table D-1. Note that this is an ideal hierarchy based on the approach being
developed by MNR. CTDOT’s working hierarchy, based on MNR’s working hierarchy, is
presented in Tables 8 and 9.
Table D-1. Detailed Rail Guideway Asset Hierarchy
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Block
Main
Track
Control Point Track
Grade Crossing
Station
Branch
Control Point Switch
Yard
Equipment
Supply System Traction Power
Site
Building
Cable Plant
Equipment
Supply System Transmission Power
Site
Building
Cable Plant
Power
Test Equipment
Traction Power Distribution
Negative Return System
Catenary Equipment
Cable Plant
Equipment
Signal Power System
Site
Building
Cable Plant
Structure
Undergrade Structure
Moveable Bridge
Fixed Bridge
D-1
CTDOT Transit Condition Assessment Guidance
Culvert
Retaining Wall
Below Grade Retained Cut
Elevated Retained Fill
Catenary Portal Structure
Overhead Structure
Miscellaneous Structure
Overhead Bridge
Block Signal System
Signaling
Interlocking
Highway Rail Grade Crossing
Network
Train Detection Control
Train Fault Detection
Yard Detection
Communication Devices
Fiber Optic System
Communications/Monitoring
Aerial Communication Network
Outside Cable Plant
Signals/Communications
Passenger Communication System
Integrated Electronic Security System
Security Systems
Closed Circuit TV
Fire Alarm System
Access Control System
Wayside Communication Network
Back Office System
Positive Train Control (Network)
Wayside Maintenance of Way
System
On-Board System
D-2
Appendix C. Maintenance Responsibility Matrix
C-1
Appendix D. Target Setting Facilities Checklist
D-1
Tier I Facilities
Passenger/Parking vs
Admin/Maintenance
Type
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
P/P
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
A/M
Operator
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
SLE
SLE
SLE
SLE
SLE
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
MNR
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
CtTransit
Total
62
Site
Platforms +
Buildings
Facility Name
Greenwich Station
Cos Cob Station
Riverside Station
Old Greenwich Station
Stamford Station
Noroton Heights
Darien
Rowayton
South Norwalk
East Norwalk
Westport
Greens Farms
Southport
Fairfield
Fairfield Metro
Bridgeport
Stratford
Milford
West Haven
New Haven
State Street
Glenbrook
Springdale
Talmadge Hill
New Canaan
Merritt 7
Wilton
Cannondale
Branchville
Redding
Bethel
Danbury
Derby
Ansonia
Seymour
Beacon Falls
Naugatuck
Waterbury
Branford
Guilford
Madison
Clinton
Westbrook
Sigourney Street
Parkville
Kane Street
Flatbush Ave
Elmwood
Newington Junction
Cedar Street
East Street
East Main Street
New Britain
Danbury Rail Yard
East Bridgeport Rail Yard
Stamford Rail Yard
New Haven Rail Yard
Springdale
CtTransit Hartford
CtTransit New Haven
CtTransit Stamford
CtTransit Waterbury (New)
No. of Structures
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
6
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
1
3
17
1
2
1
2
1
Inspected
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
156
45
Month / Year
Submitted to NTD
TERM (1-5)
Month / Year
Inspection Date
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Aug-17
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
Aug-16
Oct-18
Oct-18
Oct-18
NTD Report Year
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
18-Oct
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
18-Oct
TBD
TBD
TBD
Condition
1
2
1
3
3
1
2
1
4
1
4
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
4
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
3
1
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
In SGR?
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
22
Next Due Date
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Aug-21
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
Aug-20
Oct-22
Oct-22
Oct-22
40%
Appendix E. Slow Zone Calculations
E-1
5/1/2018
11/1/2017
22
20
21
21
21
Total # of Slow Zones
Slow Zone Calculations
Total % of Speed Restriction
23
23
24
5%
May
5/1/2018
30
24
April
4%
4/1/2018
25
20
2%
4%
March
3/1/2018
5%
February
4%
2/1/2018
20
20
January
4%
1/1/2018
15
10
5
0
4%
12/1/2017
10%
6/1/2018
4%
11/1/2017
9%
4/1/2018
4%
10/1/2017
8%
3/1/2018
September October November December
2/1/2018
6%
9/1/2017
7%
1/1/2018
August
12/1/2017
6%
8/1/2017
6%
July
10/1/2017
6%
7/1/2017
5%
4%
3%
2%
9/1/2017
SFY 18 - Guideway Performance Measure
SFY 19 - End of Year Target
21
6/1/2018
1%
0%
8/1/2017
Slow Zone
Percentage
7/1/2017
June
4%
Appendix F. TAPT Results
F-1
Prioritized Lists of Needs
F-2
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Needs - Tier I Bus
Year
Rank
Asset Name
Description
Count
Cost
PI
Programmed
Project
2018
2018
10 CTTransit Stamford 2011 Ford Escape
11 CTTransit New Haven 2011 Ford Escape
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
3
5
$98,145
$163,575
0.3031
0.3031
P
P
2018
2018
2018
12 CTTransit Hartford 1995 International Service Truck
12 CTTransit Waterbury 1995 International Service Truck
14 CTTransit Stamford 1997 M8-Rack Body & Plow
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
1
1
1
$167,775
$167,775
$167,775
0.2897
0.2897
0.2126
P
P
P
2018
2018
15 CTTransit Hartford 1999 Chevrolet Pick Up
16 CTTransit Stamford 2001 New Flyer
Service-Truck
Transit Bus
1
2
$167,775
$848,172
0.1424
0.0973
P
Y
2018
2018
16 New Britain 2001 New Flyer
18 CTTransit New Haven 2004 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
41
$424,086
$17,387,526
0.0973
0.0402
Y
Y
2018
2018
2018
2018
18
20
21
22
Dattco 2004 New Flyer
CTTransit Hartford 2003 Freightliner Service Patrol
CTTransit Hartford 2005 New Flyer
CTTransit Stamford 2003 MCI
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
Transit Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
1
1
48
2
$424,086
$167,775
$20,356,128
$973,214
0.0402
0.0247
0.0234
0.0110
Y
P
Y
Y
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
DOT0403 *
Various *
Various **
Various *
Various
Various
Various *
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
1
2
3
3
5
6
CTTransit Hartford 2007 New Flyer
Nason/Kelley 2007 MCI
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford Escape
CTTransit Waterbury 2014 Chevrolet Traverse
CTTransit Hartford 2014 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford E350 shuttle van
Transit Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Van
64
1
1
4
3
2
$27,141,504
$486,607
$32,715
$130,860
$59,037
$92,364
0.0077
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
0.0006
0.0005
Y
Y
P
P
P
P
Various ***
Various *
Various
Various
Various
Various
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
8
9
9
11
12
13
CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance
CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage
CTTransit Stamford Maintenance
CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage
CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance
CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage
CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage
CTTransit Stamford Maintenance
CTTransit Hartford 2008 New Flyer
New Britain 2008 New Flyer
CTTransit Hartford 2015 Ford Interceptor
CTTransit Hartford 2015 GMC Savana Parts Van
CTTransit Waterbury 2006 Chevrolet Dump Truck
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Service-SUV
Service-Van
Service-Truck
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
3
1
$17,940,583
$468,384
$801,960
$2,706,000
$3,588,117
$93,677
$541,200
$160,392
$848,172
$424,086
$130,860
$138,546
$167,775
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0077
0.0077
0.0009
0.0005
0.0002
Y
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
P
P
P
DOT04010017CN
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400 *
Various
Various
Various
DOT0400
Various
Various
Various
2018
1 CTTransit New Haven 2000 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
Service-Van
1
$46,182
1.6372
P
2018
2018
2018
1 CTTransit Stamford 2000 Chevrolet 2500 cargo
3 CTTransit New Haven 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
3 CTTransit Stamford 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-Van
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
1
2
1
$46,182
$39,358
$19,679
1.6372
0.9972
0.9972
P
P
P
2018
2018
5 CTTransit Hartford 2007 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
5 CTTransit Stamford 2007 Chevrolet CG23405 Cargo
Service-Van
Service-Van
2
1
$92,364
$46,182
0.9970
0.9970
P
P
2018
2018
2018
5 CTTransit Waterbury 2007 Ford E150
8 CTTransit Hartford 2008 Toyota hybrid
9 CTTransit Stamford 1990 M7-Plow/Dump and Sand Truck
Service-Van
Service-Auto
Service-Truck
1
2
2
$46,182
$39,358
$335,550
0.9970
0.8309
0.5069
P
P
P
2021
2021
1 CTTransit Waterbury 2016 Ford E450
2 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Escape
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
22
1
$1,551,374
$32,715
0.1602
0.0009
Y
P
2021
2021
3 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
3 CTTransit New Haven 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
2
1
$39,358
$19,679
0.0006
0.0006
P
P
*
**
***
Replacement in PY18
27 of the fleet of 41 replaced in PY18
22 of the fleet of 64 replaced in PY18
Y
Programmed in Capital Plan
P
Partially programmed in Capital Plan
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Needs - Rail
Year
Rank
2018
1
2018
2018
1
1
2018
4
2018
4
2018
4
2018
2018
4
4
2018
4
2018
4
2018
4
2018
2018
4
4
2018
4
2018
4
2018
4
2018
2018
4
4
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
4
4
25
25
25
25
29
30
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
50
50
50
54
54
54
57
58
59
60
60
60
60
60
60
66
67
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
Asset Name
East Norwalk (EB) Platform
East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Wilton Platform
Riverside (EB) Platform
Riverside (WB) Platform
Branchville Platform
Bethel Platform
Cannondale Platform
Fairfield (EB) Platform
Fairfield (WB) Platform
Redding Platform
Milford (EB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
Greenwich (EB) Platform
Greenwich (WB) Platform
Rowayton (WB) Platform
Rowayton (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
Darien (EB) Platform
Darien (WB) Platform
Clinton Platform
West Haven (EB) Platform
West Haven (WB) Platform
Southport (EB) Platform
Southport (WB) Platform
Stratford (EB) Platform
Stratford (WB) Platform
MNR 1960 MK Corp/FL9M
Track-Curved (TERM Rating 1)
Turnouts (TERM Rating 1)
Greens Farms (EB) Platform
Greens Farms (WB) Platform
Cos Cob (EB) Platform
Cos Cob (WB) Platform
Danbury Platform
Branford (EB) Platform
Branford (WB) Platform
Naugatuck Platform
Stamford (A) Platform
Ansonia Platform
Beacon Falls Platform
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Power-Substations (TERM Rating 1)
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Guideway Surfacing (TERM Rating 1)
Track-Tangent (TERM Rating 1)
MNR 1971 GMC EMD/AMF GP40
Tower Wire Car - Train T-13
MNR Greenwich Station
MNR Riverside Station
MNR Rowayton Station
MNR East Norwalk Station
MNR Milford (WB) Station
MNR Milford (EB) Station
MNR Southport Station
MNR Riverside Station
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Ties-Wood (TERM Rating 1)
Talmadge Hill Platform
Ansonia Platform
Derby Platform
New Canaan Platform
Seymour Platform
New Haven (C) Platform
Track-Curved (TERM Rating 2)
Turnouts (TERM Rating 2)
Darien (EB) Platform
Darien (WB) Platform
Greenwich (EB) Platform
Greenwich (WB) Platform
South Norwalk (EB) Platform
South Norwalk (WB) Platform
Old Greenwich (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
East Norwalk (EB) Platform
East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Description
Count
Unit
Cost
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$10,995
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
1
1
Platform
Platform
$10,995
$2,625
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$53,900
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$53,900
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$38,400
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
1
1
Platform
Platform
$29,300
$17,500
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$15,400
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$15,400
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$13,200
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
1
1
Platform
Platform
$13,183
$13,183
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$10,120
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$10,120
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
1
Platform
$7,660
1
1
Platform
Platform
$7,660
$2,622
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Locomotive - MNR
Track-Curved
Turnouts
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Platform Elec
Facility-Equipment
Power-Substations
Facility-Conveyance
Guideway Surfacing
Track-Tangent
Locomotive - MNR
Service-Rail
Facility-Electrical
Facility-Electrical
Facility-Electrical
Facility-Electrical
Facility-HVAC
Facility-HVAC
Facility-HVAC
Facility-Interior
Facility-Fire
Ties-Wood
Platform Canopy
Platform Canopy
Platform Canopy
Platform Canopy
Platform Canopy
Platform Canopy
Track-Curved
Turnouts
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
26
58
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
59
48
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
21
48
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Vehicles
Track Miles
Turnouts
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Building
Substations
Building
Track Miles
Track Miles
Vehicles
Vehicle
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Track Miles
Turnouts
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$2,622
$875
$875
$400
$200
$200
$94,450
$94,450
$10,383
$10,383
$15,865,974
$51,694,836
$42,158,750
$73,450
$73,450
$49,450
$49,450
$18,100
$6,650
$6,650
$1,750
$1,100
$1,050
$525
$506,240
$170,500,000
$101,248
$7,398,600
$66,000,000
$15,865,974
$150,000
$354,265
$354,265
$5,745
$1,185
$323,907
$1,583
$366
$517,771
$177,184
$4,620,000
$37,400
$6,963
$6,909
$3,200
$3,040
$150
$41,753,521
$34,890,000
$321,000
$321,000
$209,900
$209,900
$115,800
$115,800
$77,600
$55,000
$55,000
$53,400
$53,400
PI
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.3977
0.2815
0.2808
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2481
0.2476
0.2372
0.2260
0.2141
0.1885
0.1880
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1762
0.1709
0.1354
0.1271
0.1271
0.1271
0.1271
0.1271
0.1271
0.1259
0.1253
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
Programmed
Project
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
03010170CN
03010170CN
03010195PE
03010195PE
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03010072CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03010195PE
03010195PE
03010170CN
03010170CN
Year
Rank
Asset Name
Wilton Platform
Westport (EB) Platform
Westport (WB) Platform
Rowayton (WB) Platform
Rowayton (EB) Platform
Fairfield (EB) Platform
Fairfield (WB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
Glenbrook Platform
Stratford (EB) Platform
Stratford (WB) Platform
Springdale Platform
Merritt 7 Platform
New Haven State Street Platform
Ansonia Platform
Derby Platform
Seymour Platform
Bridgeport (EB) Platform
Bridgeport (WB) Platform
2018
2018
68
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
2018
68
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
2018
68
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
2018
68
68
2018
68
2018
68
2018
98 Ties-Concrete (TERM Rating 1)
Description
Count
Unit
PI
Cost
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$50,000
$49,050
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$49,050
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$47,850
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$47,850
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$35,000
$35,000
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$33,000
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$25,400
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$22,500
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$22,500
$18,500
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$16,500
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$10,000
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$5,250
Platform Structure
Platform Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$2,000
$1,800
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$450
Platform Structure
1
Platform
$450
Ties-Concrete
4
Track Miles
$3,520,000
870
105
Structures
Track Miles
$6,472,800
$13,167,000
2018
2018
99 Power-Poles (TERM Rating 1)
100 Guideway Surfacing (TERM Rating 2)
Power-Poles
Guideway Surfacing
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
101 Power-Substations (TERM Rating 2)
102 Bridge 02237R
102 Bridge 03680R
102 Bridge 08098R
102 Bridge 08154R
102 Bridge 08261R
102 Bridge 08269R
102 Bridge 08209R
109 Bridge 08264R
109 Bridge 03693R
109 Bridge 03686R
109 Bridge 08059R
109 Bridge 03638R
109 Bridge 08012R
109 Bridge 08075R
109 Bridge 08263R
109 Bridge 01318R
109 Bridge 03639R
109 Bridge 03948R
109 Bridge 08074R
109 Bridge 01312R
109 Bridge 04235R
109 Bridge 01403R
109 Bridge 03946R
109 Bridge 08097R
109 Bridge 08071R
109 Bridge 01348R
109 Bridge 08050R
109 Bridge 08022R
109 Bridge 08060R
109 Bridge 08055R
109 Bridge 08287R
109 Bridge 04232R
109 Bridge 04197R
109 Bridge 03691R
109 Bridge 08035R
109 Bridge 08003R
109 Bridge 08200R
109 Bridge 03955R
109 Bridge 08006R
109 Bridge 08086R
109 Bridge 08268R
109 Bridge 08015R
109 Bridge 04224R
109 Bridge 08072R
109 Bridge 08279R
109 Bridge 08266R
109 Bridge 08217R
109 Bridge 08219R
109 Bridge 08218R
109 Bridge 08274R
152 Bridge 08070R
152 Bridge 08267R
152 Bridge 08210R
152 Bridge 08207R
156 Bridge 08008R Cos Cob Movable
156 Bridge 08080R Devon Movable
158 Tamper
159 Track-Tangent (TERM Rating 2)
160 MNR Stratford (EB) Station
Power-Substations
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Moveable
Bridge - Moveable
Service-Rail
Track-Tangent
Facility-Plumbing
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
26
1
Substations
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Vehicle
Track Miles
Building
$77,500,000
$28,700,000
$14,600,000
$12,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,300,000
$1,300,000
$1,300,000
$41,300,000
$33,000,000
$25,800,000
$20,400,000
$20,000,000
$19,200,000
$18,100,000
$16,800,000
$15,500,000
$14,300,000
$14,300,000
$14,300,000
$13,800,000
$13,800,000
$13,700,000
$12,900,000
$12,800,000
$12,600,000
$12,300,000
$12,200,000
$11,700,000
$10,700,000
$10,200,000
$9,200,000
$9,000,000
$8,900,000
$8,400,000
$8,200,000
$8,000,000
$7,900,000
$7,400,000
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
$5,300,000
$4,600,000
$4,200,000
$3,400,000
$2,100,000
$1,800,000
$1,100,000
$1,100,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$13,000,000
$10,300,000
$5,400,000
$2,700,000
$750,000,000
$750,000,000
$150,000
$35,750,000
$782,089
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1252
0.1206
0.1169
0.1119
0.1049
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1019
0.1007
0.0850
0.0781
Programmed
Project
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
03020014PE
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
Y*
P
P
P
P
P
N
N
N
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
N
P
N
P
N
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
N
N
P
N
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03010072CN
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
03000196CN
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
03000196CN
03000190 (C Program)
Year
Rank
Asset Name
Description
Count
Unit
PI
Cost
2018
2018
160 MNR Fairfield (WB) Station
160 MNR Fairfield (EB) Station
Facility-Electrical
Facility-Electrical
1
1
Building
Building
$631,314
$354,265
2018
160 MNR Riverside Station
Facility-HVAC
1
Building
$272,511
2018
160 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Facility-Electrical
1
Building
$227,808
2018
160 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Facility-HVAC
1
Building
$227,808
2018
2018
160 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
160 MNR Seymour Station
Facility-Plumbing
Facility-Plumbing
1
1
Building
Building
$101,248
$27,251
2018
160 MNR Cos Cob Station
Facility-Electrical
1
Building
$905
2018
160 MNR East Norwalk Station
Facility-Plumbing
1
Building
$91
2018
170 MNR Greens Farms Station
Facility-Electrical
1
Building
$1,777
2018
2018
171 MNR New Haven Station
171 MNR New Haven Station
Facility-Interior
Facility-Substructure
1
1
Building
Building
$24,696,047
$23,396,255
2018
171 MNR Stratford (EB) Station
Facility-Interior
1
Building
$14,859,686
2018
171 MNR Noroton Heights Station
Facility-Shell
1
Building
$817,534
2018
171 MNR Bridgeport (WB) Station
Facility-Shell
1
Building
$574,300
2018
2018
171 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
171 MNR Branchville Station
Facility-Shell
Facility-Interior
1
1
Building
Building
$531,552
$517,771
2018
171 MNR Cannondale Station
Facility-Interior
1
Building
$517,771
2018
171 MNR Derby Station
Facility-Interior
1
Building
$517,771
2018
171 MNR Noroton Heights Station
Facility-Interior
1
Building
$517,771
2018
2018
171 MNR Seymour Station
171 MNR Derby Station
Facility-Interior
Facility-Substructure
1
1
Building
Building
$517,771
$490,520
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2019
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
171
171
171
171
171
188
188
188
191
192
193
194
194
194
194
194
194
200
201
202
203
204
205
205
207
208
208
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
7
8
9
9
9
9
9
1
1
Facility-Interior
Facility-Shell
Facility-Interior
Facility-Shell
Facility-Interior
Facility-Shell
Facility-Interior
Facility-Substructure
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Service-Rail
Power-Cable
Facility-Site
Ties-Wood
Ties-Concrete
Signal System
EMU
EMU
Locomotive - SLE
Commuter Rail Coach
Commuter Rail Coach
Service-Rail
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Guideway Surfacing
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Commuter Rail Coach
Commuter Rail Coach
MNR Danbury Station
MNR Rowayton Station
MNR Rowayton Station
MNR Wilton Station
MNR Wilton Station
MNR Stamford Station
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Tie Inserter w/ Crane
Tie Shear
Railroad Box Car
Railroad Hopper
Caboose
Railroad CC Flat Car
Railroad Flat Car
Railroad Flat Well Car
Railroad Storage Box Car
Power-Cable (TERM Rating 2)
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Ties-Wood (TERM Rating 2)
Ties-Concrete (TERM Rating 2)
Waterbury Signals
MNR 1974 GE/A Car
MNR 1974 GE/B Car
SLE 1993 GE/P40 Genesis
SLE 1991 Mafersa Sociedade/KRC Coach
SLE 1991 Mafersa Sociedade/KRC Cab
Wire Reel Car Road
MNR New Haven - Storehouse
MNR Bridgeport Rail Facility Building
MNR New Haven - Blowing Area Shelter
MNR New Haven - EMU Maintenance Shop
MNR New Haven - Training Building
MNR New Haven - Diesel-CSR Shop
Guideway Surfacing (TERM Rating 3)
MNR New Haven - Storehouse
MNR New Haven - EMU Maintenance Shop
MNR New Haven - Training Building
MNR New Haven - Diesel-CSR Shop
MNR Bridgeport Rail Facility Building
MNR New Haven - Blowing Area Shelter
MNR 1986 Bombardier / Proj 19 Coach
MNR 1986 Bombardier / Proj 19 Cab
*
- SLE
- SLE
- MNR
- MNR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
28
1
1
1
1
1
288
1
59
7
26
18
18
12
23
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
66
1
1
1
1
1
1
15
5
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicle
Track Miles
Building
Track Miles
Track Miles
Track Miles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicle
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Track Miles
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Vehicles
Vehicles
$406,209
$13,259
$8,397
$4,547
$2,880
$2,600,214
$329,056
$329,056
$150,000
$150,000
$750,000
$4,200,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$51,701,760
$151,872
$45,430,000
$6,160,000
$73,000,000
$47,597,922
$47,597,922
$31,731,948
$58,033,600
$25,232,000
$150,000
$6,960,800
$2,892,800
$526,128
$5,225,120
$4,104,160
$3,380,960
$8,276,400
$1,392,160
$1,045,024
$820,832
$676,192
$578,560
$105,226
$37,848,000
$12,616,000
Y
Replacement already occurred in previous Fiscal Years
Programmed in Capital Plan
P
Partially programmed in Capital Plan or Authorized but not Allocated
N
Not Programmed in Capital Plan
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0781
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0685
0.0638
0.0591
0.0591
0.0591
0.0591
0.0591
0.0591
0.0591
0.0585
0.0478
0.0421
0.0336
0.0118
0.0102
0.0102
0.0027
0.0018
0.0018
0.0011
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0192
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
0.0003
0.0003
Programmed
Project
N
N
N
P
P
P
N
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
N
03000138CN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y*
P
P
P
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
P
N
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
N
P
N
N
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03040016CN
03000200RS
03000200RS
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
Scenario 1
F-7
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 1 - Bus (State Match Only)
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
NWLKTD 1-2004 Ford Econoline E350
NWLKTD 2-2004 Ford Econoline E450
HART 1-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
HART 2-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
Bus
Bus
Bus
Bus
9
1
6
2
634,653
70,517
423,102
141,034
4.8544
4.8544
2.5390
2.5390
Y
Y
Y
Y
DOT0412 *
DOT0412*
DOT0416
DOT0416
Description
1
1
3
4
2018
2018
4 NWCTD 1-2007 Ford Startrans
6 NECTD 1-2008 Ford Startrans
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
70,517
70,517
2.5390
1.9768
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
6 NECTD 2-2008 Ford Supreme
6 NECTD 3-2008 Ford Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
2
2
141,034
141,034
1.9768
1.9768
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
6 NWLKTD 3-2008 Ford Startrans
6 WRTD 1-2008 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
70,517
70,517
1.9768
1.9768
Y
Y
DOT0412
DOT04740091RS
Service-Van
Service-Van
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
1
1
1
7
46,182
46,182
46,182
493,619
1.6632
1.6372
1.6372
1.4948
P
P
P
P
DOT0416
Various
Various
Various
HART 1999 Ford Econoline
CTTransit New Haven 2000 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
CTTransit Stamford 2000 Chevrolet 2500 cargo
NWCTD 2-2009 Ford Supreme
Cutaway
Cutaway
Cutaway
Cutaway
Project Number
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
11
12
12
14
2018
2018
14 WRTD 2-2009 Ford Startrans
14 WRTD 3-2009 Ford Startrans Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
70,517
70,517
1.4948
1.4948
Y
Y
DOT04740091RS
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
17 SEAT 2004 Ford Explorer
18 NWLKTD 2005 Ford Freestyle
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
1
1
32,715
32,715
1.3911
1.2806
P
P
DOT0414
DOT0412
2018
2018
2018
19 NWLKTD 2005 Ford Sedan 500 AW
20 HART 2005 Ford E350
21 ETD 1-2010 Ford E450
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
1
1
1
19,679
46,182
70,517
1.2797
1.2794
1.0813
P
P
Y
Various
DOT0416
DOT0478
2018
2018
21 ETD 2-2010 Ford E450
21 NECTD 4-2010 Ford Startrans
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
2
1
141,034
70,517
1.0813
1.0813
Y
P
DOT0478
Various
2018
2018
21 NECTD 5-2010 Ford Startrans
25 NWLKTD 4-2010 Ford Phoenix E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
10
282,068
705,170
1.0813
1.0813
P
Y
Various
DOT0412*
2018
2018
26 CTTransit New Haven 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
26 CTTransit Stamford 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
2
1
39,358
19,679
0.9972
0.9972
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
28 CTTransit Hartford 2007 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
28 CTTransit Stamford 2007 Chevrolet CG23405 Cargo
Service-Van
Service-Van
2
1
92,364
46,182
0.9970
0.9970
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
28 CTTransit Waterbury 2007 Ford E150
31 GBTA 1982 GMC TOW truck
Service-Van
Service-Truck
1
1
46,182
167,775
0.9970
0.8932
P
P
Various
DOT0410
2018
2018
32 CTTransit Hartford 2008 Toyota hybrid
33 ETD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
Service-Auto
Cutaway Bus
2
1
39,358
70,517
0.8309
0.7266
P
Y
Various
DOT0478
2018
2018
33 NWCTD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
33 WRTD 4-2011 Ford Startrans
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
3
282,068
211,551
0.7266
0.7266
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
33 WRTD 5-2011 Ford Startrans Vans
37 HART 2009 Ford Escape
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
6
2
423,102
65,430
0.7266
0.6555
Y
P
DOT04740091RS
DOT0416
2018
2018
38 GBTA 2009 Toyota Camry
39 CTTransit Stamford 1990 M7-Plow/Dump and Sand Truck
Service-Auto
Service-Truck
2
2
39,358
335,550
0.6549
0.5069
P
P
DOT0410
Various
2018
2018
40 GBTA 2010 GMC Terrain SLE
41 ETD 4-2012 Ford F550
Service-SUV
Cutaway Bus
1
1
32,715
70,517
0.4768
0.4219
P
Y
DOT0410
DOT0478
2018
2018
41 ETD 5-2012 Ford Goshen E450
41 ETD 6-2012 Ford Phoenix
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
70,517
70,517
0.4219
0.4219
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0478
2018
2018
41 ETD 7-2012 Ford Startrans E450 28 FT
41 GBTA 1-2012 Ford Goshen
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
4
70,517
282,068
0.4219
0.4219
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0410
2018
2018
41 NWCTD 4-2012 Ford E450
41 VTD 1-2012 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
3
14
211,551
987,238
0.4219
0.4219
P
Y
Various
DOT00360199RS
2018
2018
2018
41 WRTD 6-2012 Goshen Coach
49 CTTransit Stamford 2011 Ford Escape
49 ETD 2011 Ford Escape
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
2
3
1
141,034
98,145
32,715
0.4219
0.3031
0.3031
P
P
P
Various
Various
DOT0478
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
49
52
53
53
55
GBTA 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe
CTTransit New Haven 2011 Ford Escape
CTTransit Hartford 1995 International Service Truck
CTTransit Waterbury 1995 International Service Truck
CTTransit Stamford 1997 M8-Rack Body & Plow
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
2
5
1
1
1
65,430
163,575
167,775
167,775
167,775
0.3031
0.3031
0.2897
0.2897
0.2126
P
P
P
P
P
DOT0410
Various
Various
Various
Various
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
56
57
57
57
57
NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
ETD 10-2013 Ford Goshen F550
ETD 8-2013 Ford E450
ETD 9-2013 Ford Goshen E450 28 FT
GNHTD 1-2013 Ford E350 Goshen
Facility-Fire
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
2
1
13
1,064,196
70,517
141,034
70,517
916,721
0.1709
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
P
Y
Y
Y
Y
DOT0412
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0427*
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
57
57
57
64
64
GNHTD 2-2013 Ford E450 Goshen
HART 3-2013 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
WRTD 7-2013 Goshen Coach
CTTransit Hartford 1999 Chevrolet Pick Up
VTD 1999 Ford F250 Pickup
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
4
9
3
1
1
282,068
634,653
211,551
167,775
167,775
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1424
0.1424
Y
Y
Y
P
P
DOT0427
DOT0416
DOT04740091RS
Various
DOT00360199EQ
2018
2018
2018
66 CTTransit Stamford 2-2001 New Flyer
66 New Britain 1-2001 New Flyer
68 NWLKTD 2001 Ford Utility Truck
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
2
1
1
848,172
424,086
167,775
0.0973
0.0973
0.0796
Y
Y
P
DOT0403
Various
DOT0412
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
1
2
3
1,368,252
848,172
1,272,258
0.0781
0.0581
0.0581
P
Y
Y
DOT0412
DOT0410
DOT0410
Project Number
2018
2018
2018
69 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
70 GBTA 4-2003 New Flyer
70 GBTA 5-2003 New Flyer
Facility-Electrical
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2018
2018
70 NWLKTD 6-2003 Orion VII
70 SEAT 2-2003 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
19
1
8,057,634
424,086
0.0581
0.0581
P
P
DOT0412
DOT0414
2018
70 SEAT 3-2003 New Flyer
Transit Bus
1
424,086
0.0581
P
DOT0414
2019
2019
1 HART 4-2014 Ford E450/ Goshen Coach
1 HART 5-2014 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
3
282,068
211,551
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0416
DOT0416
2019
2019
2019
2019
1
4
4
4
Cutaway Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
10
41
1
1
705,170
17,387,526
424,086
424,086
0.1602
0.0581
0.0581
0.0581
P
Y
Y
Y
DOT0424
Various
Various
DOT0424
2019
2019
4 NWLKTD 7-2004 Gillig
4 SEAT 4-2004 Gillig
3
1
1,272,258
424,086
0.0581
0.0581
P
P
DOT0424
DOT0414
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
1
1
48
1
167,775
167,775
20,356,128
167,775
0.0511
0.0511
0.0402
0.0247
P
P
Y
P
Various
DOT0410
Various
DOT0410
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0247
P
DOT0416
NWLKTD 5-2014 Chevrolet Pegasus
CTTransit New Haven 3-2004 New Flyer
Dattco 1-2004 New Flyer
MlfdTD 3-2004 New Flyer
2019
2019
2019
2019
9
9
11
12
CTTransit Hartford 2003 Freightliner Service Patrol
GBTA 2003 GMC 4500Dump Truck
CTTransit Hartford 3-2005 New Flyer
GBTA 2004 Skid Steer
2019
12 HART 2004 Ford F450
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2020
2020
2020
1 ETD 11-2015 Ford E450 Phoenix
1 GNHTD 3-2015 Ford E350 Goshen
1 GNHTD 4-2015 Ford E450 Goshen
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
11
3
282,068
775,687
211,551
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0427
DOT0427
2020
2020
1 MAT 1-2015 Goshen E350
5 CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford Escape
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
10
1
705,170
32,715
0.1602
0.1423
Y
P
DOT0422
Various
2020
2020
2020
5 CTTransit Waterbury 2014 Chevrolet Traverse
5 GBTA 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe
8 CTTransit Hartford 2014 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
4
1
3
130,860
32,715
59,037
0.1423
0.1423
0.1419
P
P
P
Various
DOT0410
Various
2020
2020
2020
9 CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford E350 shuttle van
10 NWLKTD 8-2006 Gillig
10 SEAT 5-2006 Gillig
Service-Van
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2
3
2
92,364
1,272,258
848,172
0.1418
0.0402
0.0402
P
Y
Y
Various
DOT0412
DOT0414
2020
2020
10 SEAT 6-2006 New Flyer
10 SEAT 7-2006 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
3
3
1,272,258
1,272,258
0.0402
0.0402
Y
Y
DOT0414
DOT0414
2020
2020
10 WRTD 8-2006 Gillig
15 CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
Transit Bus
Facility-Equipment
2
1
848,172
17,940,583
0.0402
0.0314
P
Y
Various
DOT04010017CN
2020
2020
2020
15 HART Passenger Facility 1
15 MAT Parking 1
18 CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
1
1
1
15,370
9,865
468,384
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0422
DOT0400
2020
2020
2020
18 CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
18 CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
18 GBTA Maint 1
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
1
1
1
801,960
2,706,000
3,936,000
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
P
P
Y
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0410
2020
2020
18 GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
18 SEAT Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
1
1
580,560
1,830,240
0.0314
0.0314
Y
P
DOT04270056CN
DOT0414
2021
1 CTTransit Waterbury 4-2016 Ford E450
Cutaway Bus
22
1,551,374
0.1602
Y
DOT0400
2021
2021
2021
2021
1
1
1
1
GNHTD 5-2016 Ford Goshen E350
HART 6-2016 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
HART 7-2016 Ford E350/ Goshen Coach
HART 8-2016 Ford E350/Goshen Coach
Cutaway
Cutaway
Cutaway
Cutaway
Bus
Bus
Bus
Bus
18
1
4
5
1,269,306
70,517
282,068
352,585
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
P
P
DOT0427
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
1
1
8
9
9
MlfdTD 1-2016 Ford E450
SEAT 1-2016 Ford Phoenix E450
CTTransit Hartford 2015 Ford Interceptor
CTTransit Hartford 2015 GMC Savana Parts Van
SEAT 2015 Dodge Caravan
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-Van
Service-Van
8
5
4
3
1
564,136
352,585
130,860
138,546
46,182
0.1602
0.1602
0.1423
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
P
P
DOT0424
DOT0414
Various
Various
DOT0414
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
11
11
CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
GBTA Maint 1
GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
1
1
1
3,588,117
93,677
541,200
787,200
116,112
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
P
P
P
P
Y
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0410
DOT04270056CN
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
19
19
HART Passenger Facility 1
MAT Parking 1
SEAT Admin/Maint 1
CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
1
1
1
61,482
39,459
366,048
160,392
608,112
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
P
P
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0422
DOT0414
DOT0400
DOT0412
*
Y
P
Replacement in PY18
Programmed in Capital Plan
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 1 - Rail (State Match Only)
Program
Year
2018
2018
2018
2018
Project
Rank
1
1
1
4
East Norwalk (EB) Platform
East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Wilton Platform
Greenwich (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
Replacement
Costs
10,995.00
10,995.00
2,625.00
10,120.00
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Unit
PI
Programmed
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
4
Greenwich (WB) Platform
Riverside (EB) Platform
Riverside (WB) Platform
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
10,120.00
53,900.00
53,900.00
2,622.00
2,622.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
Y
Y
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
4
Darien (EB) Platform
Darien (WB) Platform
Rowayton (EB) Platform
Rowayton (WB) Platform
Fairfield (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
875.00
875.00
7,660.00
7,660.00
15,400.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
P
P
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
4
Fairfield (WB) Platform
Milford (EB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
West Haven (EB) Platform
West Haven (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
15,400.00
13,182.50
13,182.50
200.00
200.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
Cannondale Platform
Branchville Platform
Redding Platform
Bethel Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
17,500.00
38,400.00
13,200.00
29,300.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
N
Project Number
03010170CN
03010170CN
03010195PE
03010195PE
2018
2018
4 Clinton Platform
25 Southport (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
400.00
94,450.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
2018
25 Southport (WB) Platform
25 Stratford (EB) Platform
25 Stratford (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
94,450.00
10,382.50
10,382.50
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
2018
2018
29 MNR 1960 MK Corp/FL9M
30 Track-Curved
Locomotive - MNR
Track - Curved
6
26
Vehicles
Track Miles
$ 15,865,974.00
$ 51,694,835.66
0.3977
0.2815
N
P
2018
2018
2018
31 Track-Turnouts
32 Cos Cob (EB) Platform
32 Cos Cob (WB) Platform
Track - Turnouts
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
58
1
1
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
$ 42,158,750.00
$
49,450.00
$
49,450.00
0.2808
0.2738
0.2738
P
N
N
2018
2018
32 Stamford (A) Platform
32 Greens Farms (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
1,100.00
73,450.00
0.2738
0.2738
N
N
2018
2018
2018
32 Greens Farms (WB) Platform
32 Danbury Platform
32 Ansonia Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
73,450.00
18,100.00
1,050.00
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
N
N
N
2018
2018
32 Beacon Falls Platform
32 Naugatuck Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
525.00
1,750.00
0.2738
0.2738
N
N
2018
2018
2018
32 Branford (EB) Platform
32 Branford (WB) Platform
43 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Facility - Equipment
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Building
$
$
$
6,650.00
6,650.00
506,240.00
0.2738
0.2738
0.2481
N
N
P
03000138CN
2019
1 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Facility - Conveyance
1
Building
$
101,248.00
0.2939
P
03000138CN
2020
2020
1 Power - Substations
2 Track Surfacing
Power - Substations
Track - Surfacing
11
59
Substations
Track Miles
$ 170,500,000.00
$ 7,398,600.00
0.2476
0.2260
P
P
03010072CN
03000190 (C Program)
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
3
4
5
6
7
7
7
7
Facility - Fire
Locomotive - MNR
Track - Tangent
Service - Rail
Facility - Electrical
Facility - Electrical
Facility - Electrical
Facility - Electrical
1
6
48
1
1
1
1
1
Building
Vehicles
Track Miles
Vehicles
Building
Building
Building
Building
$
177,184.00
$ 15,865,974.00
$ 66,000,000.00
$
150,000.00
$
1,184.56
$
354,264.56
$
354,264.56
$
5,745.48
0.2247
0.2229
0.2141
0.1974
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
P
N
P
N
N
N
N
N
03000138CN
Building
Building
Building
$
$
$
1,583.18
323,907.27
365.70
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
N
N
N
2020
2020
2020
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
MNR -1971 GMC EMD/AMF GP40
Track-Tangent
Tower Wire Car
MNR East Norwalk Station
MNR Greenwich Station
MNR Riverside Station
MNR Rowayton Station
11 MNR Milford (EB) Station
11 MNR Milford (WB) Station
11 MNR Southport Station
Facility - HVAC
Facility - HVAC
Facility - HVAC
1
1
1
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
2021
1 Track Surfacing
Track - Surfacing
105
Track Miles
$ 13,167,000.00
0.2014
P
03000190 (C Program)
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2
3
4
4
4
Track - Curved
Track - Turnouts
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
21
48
1
1
1
Track Miles
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
Platform
$ 41,753,521.11
$ 34,890,000.00
$
150.00
$
37,400.00
$
3,200.00
0.1825
0.1819
0.1795
0.1795
0.1795
P
P
N
N
N
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
2021
2021
2021
4 Derby Platform
4 Seymour Platform
9 Ansonia Platform
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
6,909.00
3,040.00
6,962.50
0.1795
0.1795
0.1795
N
N
N
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,000.00
209,900.00
209,900.00
77,600.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
10
11
11
11
11
11
Track-Curved
Track Turnouts
New Haven (C) Platform
Talmadge Hill Platform
New Canaan Platform
Derby Platform
Greenwich (EB) Platform
Greenwich (WB) Platform
Old Greenwich (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
03010170CN
03010170CN
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
Project Number
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
11
11
Darien (EB) Platform
Darien (WB) Platform
Rowayton (EB) Platform
Rowayton (WB) Platform
South Norwalk (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
321,000.00
321,000.00
47,850.00
47,850.00
115,800.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
P
P
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
11
11
South Norwalk (WB) Platform
Westport (EB) Platform
Westport (WB) Platform
Fairfield (EB) Platform
Fairfield (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
115,800.00
49,050.00
49,050.00
35,000.00
35,000.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
N
N
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
11
11
Bridgeport (EB) Platform
Bridgeport (WB) Platform
Stratford (EB) Platform
Stratford (WB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
450.00
450.00
22,500.00
22,500.00
33,000.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
N
N
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
11
11
11
11
New Haven State Street Platform
Glenbrook Platform
Springdale Platform
Merritt 7 Platform
Ansonia Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
10,000.00
25,400.00
18,500.00
16,500.00
5,250.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
N
N
N
Y
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
11
37
37
37
40
42
Seymour Platform
East Norwalk (EB) Platform
East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Wilton Platform
MNR Riverside Station
Bridge 01312R
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Facility - Interior
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Building
Bridge
$
1,800.00
$
53,400.00
$
53,400.00
$
50,000.00
$
517,771.28
$ 13,800,000.00
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1767
0.1762
0.1418
N
N
N
N
N
P
03000175
2021
2021
42 Bridge 01318R
42 Bridge 01348R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 15,500,000.00
$ 12,300,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
Y
N
P
Fully Funded
Not Authorized
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
03010195PE
03010195PE
03020014PE
Scenario 2
F-12
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 2 - Bus (State Match and Bonding)
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed Project Number
2018
2018
1 NWLKTD 1-2004 Ford Econoline E350
1 NWLKTD 2-2004 Ford Econoline E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
9
1
634,653
70,517
4.8544
4.8544
Y
Y
DOT0412 *
DOT0412*
2018
2018
2018
3 HART 1-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
4 HART 2-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
4 NWCTD 1-2007 Ford Startrans
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
6
2
1
423,102
141,034
70,517
2.5390
2.5390
2.5390
Y
Y
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
Various
2018
2018
6 NECTD 1-2008 Ford Startrans
6 NECTD 2-2008 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
2
70,517
141,034
1.9768
1.9768
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
2018
6 NECTD 3-2008 Ford Van
6 NWLKTD 3-2008 Ford Startrans
6 WRTD 1-2008 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
2
1
1
141,034
70,517
70,517
1.9768
1.9768
1.9768
P
Y
Y
Various
DOT0412
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
11 HART 1999 Ford Econoline
12 CTTransit New Haven 2000 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
Service-Van
Service-Van
1
1
46,182
46,182
1.6632
1.6372
P
P
DOT0416
Various
2018
2018
2018
12 CTTransit Stamford 2000 Chevrolet 2500 cargo
14 NWCTD 2-2009 Ford Supreme
14 WRTD 2-2009 Ford Startrans
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
7
1
46,182
493,619
70,517
1.6372
1.4948
1.4948
P
P
Y
Various
Various
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
14 WRTD 3-2009 Ford Startrans Van
17 SEAT 2004 Ford Explorer
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
1
1
70,517
32,715
1.4948
1.3911
Y
P
DOT04740091RS
DOT0414
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
18
19
20
21
21
21
21
25
26
26
28
28
28
31
32
33
33
33
33
37
38
39
40
41
41
41
41
41
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Service-Van
Service-Van
Service-Truck
Service-Auto
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Truck
Service-SUV
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
10
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
4
3
6
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
32,715
19,679
46,182
70,517
141,034
70,517
282,068
705,170
39,358
19,679
92,364
46,182
46,182
167,775
39,358
70,517
282,068
211,551
423,102
65,430
39,358
335,550
32,715
70,517
70,517
70,517
70,517
282,068
1.2806
1.2797
1.2794
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
0.9972
0.9972
0.9970
0.9970
0.9970
0.8932
0.8309
0.7266
0.7266
0.7266
0.7266
0.6555
0.6549
0.5069
0.4768
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
P
P
P
Y
Y
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
DOT0412
Various
DOT0416
DOT0478
DOT0478
Various
Various
DOT0412*
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
DOT0410
Various
DOT0478
Various
Various
DOT04740091RS
DOT0416
DOT0410
Various
DOT0410
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0410
2018
2018
2018
41 NWCTD 4-2012 Ford E450
41 VTD 1-2012 Ford Supreme
41 WRTD 6-2012 Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
3
14
2
211,551
987,238
141,034
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
P
Y
P
Various
DOT00360199RS
Various
2018
2018
2018
49 CTTransit Stamford 2011 Ford Escape
49 ETD 2011 Ford Escape
49 GBTA 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
3
1
2
98,145
32,715
65,430
0.3031
0.3031
0.3031
P
P
P
Various
DOT0478
DOT0410
2018
2018
52 CTTransit New Haven 2011 Ford Escape
53 CTTransit Hartford 1995 International Service Truck
Service-SUV
Service-Truck
5
1
163,575
167,775
0.3031
0.2897
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
2018
53 CTTransit Waterbury 1995 International Service Truck
55 CTTransit Stamford 1997 M8-Rack Body & Plow
56 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
Facility-Fire
1
1
1
167,775
167,775
1,064,196
0.2897
0.2126
0.1709
P
P
P
Various
Various
DOT0412
2018
2018
57 ETD 10-2013 Ford Goshen F550
57 ETD 8-2013 Ford E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
2
70,517
141,034
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0478
2018
2018
57 ETD 9-2013 Ford Goshen E450 28 FT
57 GNHTD 1-2013 Ford E350 Goshen
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
13
70,517
916,721
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0427*
2018
2018
2018
57 GNHTD 2-2013 Ford E450 Goshen
57 HART 3-2013 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
57 WRTD 7-2013 Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
9
3
282,068
634,653
211,551
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
Y
DOT0427
DOT0416
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
64 CTTransit Hartford 1999 Chevrolet Pick Up
64 VTD 1999 Ford F250 Pickup
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
1
1
167,775
167,775
0.1424
0.1424
P
P
Various
DOT00360199EQ
2018
2018
66 CTTransit Stamford 2-2001 New Flyer
66 New Britain 1-2001 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2
1
848,172
424,086
0.0973
0.0973
Y
Y
DOT0403
Various
NWLKTD 2005 Ford Freestyle
NWLKTD 2005 Ford Sedan 500 AW
HART 2005 Ford E350
ETD 1-2010 Ford E450
ETD 2-2010 Ford E450
NECTD 4-2010 Ford Startrans
NECTD 5-2010 Ford Startrans
NWLKTD 4-2010 Ford Phoenix E450
CTTransit New Haven 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit Stamford 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit Hartford 2007 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
CTTransit Stamford 2007 Chevrolet CG23405 Cargo
CTTransit Waterbury 2007 Ford E150
GBTA 1982 GMC TOW truck
CTTransit Hartford 2008 Toyota hybrid
ETD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
NWCTD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
WRTD 4-2011 Ford Startrans
WRTD 5-2011 Ford Startrans Vans
HART 2009 Ford Escape
GBTA 2009 Toyota Camry
CTTransit Stamford 1990 M7-Plow/Dump and Sand Truck
GBTA 2010 GMC Terrain SLE
ETD 4-2012 Ford F550
ETD 5-2012 Ford Goshen E450
ETD 6-2012 Ford Phoenix
ETD 7-2012 Ford Startrans E450 28 FT
GBTA 1-2012 Ford Goshen
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed Project Number
2018
68 NWLKTD 2001 Ford Utility Truck
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0796
P
DOT0412
2018
2018
69 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
70 GBTA 4-2003 New Flyer
Facility-Electrical
Transit Bus
1
2
1,368,252
848,172
0.0781
0.0581
P
Y
DOT0412
DOT0410
2018
2018
2018
70 GBTA 5-2003 New Flyer
70 NWLKTD 6-2003 Orion VII
70 SEAT 2-2003 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
3
19
1
1,272,258
8,057,634
424,086
0.0581
0.0581
0.0581
Y
P
P
DOT0410
DOT0412
DOT0414
2018
2018
70 SEAT 3-2003 New Flyer
75 CTTransit New Haven 3-2004 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
41
424,086
17,387,526
0.0581
0.0402
P
Y
DOT0414
Various
2018
2018
2018
75 Dattco 1-2004 New Flyer
75 MlfdTD 3-2004 New Flyer
75 NWLKTD 7-2004 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
1
3
424,086
424,086
1,272,258
0.0402
0.0402
0.0402
Y
P
P
Various
DOT0424
DOT0412
2018
2018
75 SEAT 4-2004 Gillig
80 CTTransit Hartford 2003 Freightliner Service Patrol
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
1
1
424,086
167,775
0.0402
0.0247
P
P
DOT0414
Various
2018
80 GBTA 2003 GMC 4500Dump Truck
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0247
P
DOT0410
2019
1 HART 4-2014 Ford E450/ Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
4
282,068
0.1602
Y
DOT0416
2019
2019
1 HART 5-2014 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
1 NWLKTD 5-2014 Chevrolet Pegasus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
3
10
211,551
705,170
0.1602
0.1602
Y
P
DOT0416
DOT0424
2019
2019
2019
4 CTTransit Hartford 3-2005 New Flyer
5 GBTA 2004 Skid Steer
5 HART 2004 Ford F450
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
48
1
1
20,356,128
167,775
167,775
0.0402
0.0247
0.0247
Y
P
P
Various
DOT0410
DOT0416
3
2
3
3
2
2
1,272,258
848,172
1,272,258
1,272,258
848,172
973,214
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0148
Y
Y
Y
Y
P
Y
DOT0412
DOT0414
DOT0414
DOT0414
Various
Various
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
7
7
7
7
7
12
NWLKTD 8-2006 Gillig
SEAT 5-2006 Gillig
SEAT 6-2006 New Flyer
SEAT 7-2006 New Flyer
WRTD 8-2006 Gillig
CTTransit Stamford 5-2003 MCI
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
8
9
10
10
10
13
13
13
13
13
13
ETD 11-2015 Ford E450 Phoenix
GNHTD 3-2015 Ford E350 Goshen
GNHTD 4-2015 Ford E450 Goshen
MAT 1-2015 Goshen E350
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford Escape
CTTransit Waterbury 2014 Chevrolet Traverse
GBTA 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe
CTTransit Hartford 2014 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford E350 shuttle van
CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
HART Passenger Facility 1
MAT Parking 1
CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
GBTA Maint 1
GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
SEAT Admin/Maint 1
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
4
11
3
10
1
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
282,068
775,687
211,551
705,170
32,715
130,860
32,715
59,037
92,364
17,940,583
15,370
9,865
468,384
801,960
2,706,000
3,936,000
580,560
1,830,240
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1423
0.1423
0.1423
0.1419
0.1418
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
Y
Y
Y
Y
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
P
DOT0478
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0422
Various
Various
DOT0410
Various
Various
DOT04010017CN
DOT0416
DOT0422
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0410
DOT04270056CN
DOT0414
2021
1 CTTransit Waterbury 4-2016 Ford E450
Cutaway Bus
22
1,551,374
0.1602
Y
DOT0400
2021
1 GNHTD 5-2016 Ford Goshen E350
Cutaway Bus
18
1,269,306
0.1602
Y
DOT0427
2021
2021
2021
1 HART 6-2016 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
1 HART 7-2016 Ford E350/ Goshen Coach
1 HART 8-2016 Ford E350/Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
4
5
70,517
282,068
352,585
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
2021
2021
1 MlfdTD 1-2016 Ford E450
1 SEAT 1-2016 Ford Phoenix E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
8
5
564,136
352,585
0.1602
0.1602
P
P
DOT0424
DOT0414
2021
2021
2021
8 CTTransit Hartford 2015 Ford Interceptor
9 CTTransit Hartford 2015 GMC Savana Parts Van
9 SEAT 2015 Dodge Caravan
Service-SUV
Service-Van
Service-Van
4
3
1
130,860
138,546
46,182
0.1423
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
Various
Various
DOT0410
2021
2021
11 CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
11 CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
3,588,117
93,677
0.0945
0.0945
P
P
DOT0400
DOT0400
2021
2021
2021
11 CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
11 GBTA Maint 1
11 GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
1
541,200
787,200
116,112
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
P
Y
Y
DOT0400
DOT0410
DOT04270056CN
2021
2021
11 HART Passenger Facility 1
11 MAT Parking 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
61,482
39,459
0.0945
0.0945
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0422
2021
2021
2021
11 SEAT Admin/Maint 1
19 CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
19 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
1
366,048
160,392
608,112
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
P
P
P
DOT0414
DOT0400
DOT0412
2021
2021
21 CTTransit Hartford 4-2007 New Flyer
21 HART 10-2007 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
64
10
27,141,504
4,240,860
0.0402
0.0402
Y
P
DOT0400
DOT0416
2021
2021
21 SEAT 8-2007 New Flyer
21 SEAT 9-2007 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
6
2
2,544,516
848,172
0.0402
0.0402
P
P
DOT0414
DOT0414
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed Project Number
2021
25 GNHTD 8-2015 Dodge Caravan
Van
4
184,728
0.0280
Y
DOT0427
2021
2021
26 CTTransit Waterbury 2006 Chevrolet Dump Truck
26 SEAT 2006 RAM Pickup
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
1
1
167,775
167,775
0.0247
0.0247
P
P
Various
DOT0410
2021
2021
2021
28 CTTransit Hartford 5-2008 New Flyer
28 New Britain 2-2008 New Flyer
28 NWLKTD 10-2008 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2
1
4
848,172
424,086
1,696,344
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
Y
Y
P
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0412
2021
2021
28 NWLKTD 9-2008 Gillig
28 SEAT 10-2008 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
3
2
1,272,258
848,172
0.0234
0.0234
P
P
DOT0412
DOT0414
2021
2021
2021
28 WRTD 9-2008 Gillig
34 MlfdTD 4-2009 New Flyer
35 Nason/Kelley 1-2007 MCI
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
3
4
1
1,272,258
1,696,344
486,607
0.0234
0.0077
0.0074
Y
P
Y
DOTO4740091RS
DOT0424
DOT0400
2021
2021
36 GNHTD 9-2016 Dodge Caravan
37 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Escape
Van
Service-SUV
2
1
92,364
32,715
0.0063
0.0009
Y
P
DOT0427
Various
2021
2021
2021
37 HART 2016 Ford Escape
37 HART 2016 Ford Explorer
37 NWLKTD 2016 Ford Explorer
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
1
1
2
32,715
32,715
65,430
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0412
2021
2021
37 VTD 2016 Ford Escape
37 WRTD 2016 Jeep Patriot
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
1
1
32,715
32,715
0.0009
0.0009
P
P
DOT00360199EQ
Various
2021
2021
43 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
43 CTTransit New Haven 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
2
1
39,358
19,679
0.0006
0.0006
P
P
Various
Various
*
Y
P
Replacement in PY18
Programmed in Capital Plan
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 2 - Rail (State Match and Bonding)
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of
Units
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2018
2018
1 East Norwalk (EB) Platform
1 East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
10,995.00
10,995.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
1 Wilton Platform
4 Greenwich (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
2,625.00
10,120.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
Greenwich (WB) Platform
Riverside (EB) Platform
Riverside (WB) Platform
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
10,120.00
53,900.00
53,900.00
2,622.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
Y
03010170CN
2018
2018
4 Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
4 Darien (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
2,622.00
875.00
0.4889
0.4889
Y
P
03010170CN
03010195PE
2018
2018
4 Darien (WB) Platform
4 Rowayton (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
875.00
7,660.00
0.4889
0.4889
P
N
03010195PE
2018
2018
4 Rowayton (WB) Platform
4 Fairfield (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
7,660.00
15,400.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
Fairfield (WB) Platform
Milford (EB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
West Haven (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
15,400.00
13,182.50
13,182.50
200.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
4
4
4
4
25
25
25
25
29
30
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
43
44
45
46
West Haven (WB) Platform
Cannondale Platform
Branchville Platform
Redding Platform
Bethel Platform
Clinton Platform
Southport (EB) Platform
Southport (WB) Platform
Stratford (EB) Platform
Stratford (WB) Platform
MNR 1960 MK Corp/FL9M
Track Curved
Track Turnouts
Cos Cob (EB) Platform
Cos Cob (WB) Platform
Stamford (A) Platform
Greens Farms (EB) Platform
Greens Farms (WB) Platform
Danbury Platform
Ansonia Platform
Beacon Falls Platform
Naugatuck Platform
Branford (EB) Platform
Branford (WB) Platform
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Power Substations
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Track-Surfacing
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Locomotive - MNR
Track - Curved
Track - Turnouts
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Facility - Equipment
Power - Substations
Facility - Conveyance
Track - Surfacing
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
26
58
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
59
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Vehicles
Track Miles
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Building
Substations
Building
Track Miles
$
200.00
$
17,500.00
$
38,400.00
$
13,200.00
$
29,300.00
$
400.00
$
94,450.00
$
94,450.00
$
10,382.50
$
10,382.50
$ 15,865,974.00
$ 51,694,835.66
$ 42,158,750.00
$
49,450.00
$
49,450.00
$
1,100.00
$
73,450.00
$
73,450.00
$
18,100.00
$
1,050.00
$
525.00
$
1,750.00
$
6,650.00
$
6,650.00
$
506,240.00
$ 170,500,000.00
$
101,248.00
$ 7,398,600.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.3977
0.2815
0.2808
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2481
0.2476
0.2372
0.2260
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
P
P
48
6
Track Miles
Vehicles
$ 66,000,000.00
$ 15,865,974.00
0.2141
0.2055
P
N
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
2019
2019
1 Track Tangent
2 MNR 1971 GMC EMD/AMF GP40
Track - Tangent
Locomotive - MNR
2019
3 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Facility - Fire
1
Building
$
177,184.00
0.2003
P
2019
2019
2019
4 Tower Wire Car
5 MNR East Norwalk Station
5 MNR Greenwich Station
Service - Rail
Facility - Electrical
Facility - Electrical
1
1
1
Vehicle
Building
Building
$
$
$
150,000.00
1,184.56
354,264.56
0.1927
0.1855
0.1855
N
N
N
2019
2019
5 MNR Riverside Station
5 MNR Rowayton Station
Facility - Electrical
Facility - Electrical
1
1
Building
Building
$
$
354,264.56
5,745.48
0.1855
0.1855
N
N
2019
2019
2019
9 MNR Milford (EB) Station
9 MNR Milford (WB) Station
9 MNR Southport Station
Facility - HVAC
Facility - HVAC
Facility - HVAC
1
1
1
Building
Building
Building
$
$
$
1,583.18
323,907.27
365.70
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
N
N
N
1
105
Building
Track Miles
$
517,771.28
$ 13,167,000.00
0.1762
0.1576
N
P
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
$ 41,753,521.11
$
150.00
$
37,400.00
0.1477
0.1471
0.1471
P
N
N
Platform
Platform
$
$
3,200.00
6,909.00
0.1471
0.1471
N
N
Platform
Platform
Track Miles
$
6,962.50
$
3,040.00
$ 34,890,000.00
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
N
N
P
Project Number
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03010072CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
2019
2019
12 MNR Riverside Station
13 Track Surfacing
Facility - Interior
Track - Surfacing
2019
2019
2019
14 Track Curved
15 New Haven (C) Platform
15 Talmadge Hill Platform
Track - Curved
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
21
1
1
2019
2019
15 New Canaan Platform
15 Derby Platform
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
1
1
2019
2019
2019
15 Ansonia Platform
15 Seymour Platform
21 Track Turnouts
Platform - Canopy
Platform - Canopy
Track - Turnouts
1
1
48
2019
2019
22 Greenwich (EB) Platform
22 Greenwich (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
209,900.00
209,900.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
2019
22 Old Greenwich (EB) Platform
22 Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
22 Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
77,600.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
N
Y
Y
03010170CN
03010170CN
2019
22 Darien (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
1
Platform
$
321,000.00
0.1448
P
03010195PE
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of
Units
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2019
2019
22 Darien (WB) Platform
22 Rowayton (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
321,000.00
47,850.00
0.1448
0.1448
P
N
2019
2019
22 Rowayton (WB) Platform
22 South Norwalk (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
47,850.00
115,800.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
2019
2019
22
22
22
22
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
115,800.00
53,400.00
53,400.00
49,050.00
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
N
N
2019
2019
22 Westport (WB) Platform
22 Fairfield (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
49,050.00
35,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
22 Fairfield (WB) Platform
22 Bridgeport (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
35,000.00
450.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
22 Bridgeport (WB) Platform
22 Stratford (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
450.00
22,500.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
2019
2019
22
22
22
22
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
22,500.00
33,000.00
10,000.00
25,400.00
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
N
N
2019
2019
22 Springdale Platform
22 Merritt 7 Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
18,500.00
16,500.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
Y
2019
2019
22 Wilton Platform
22 Derby Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
50,000.00
2,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
22
22
52
53
54
55
56
Ansonia Platform
Seymour Platform
Ties Wood
Power Substations
Ties Concrete
Power Poles
Bridge 08287R
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Ties - Wood
Power - Substations
Ties - Concrete
Power - Poles
Bridge - Fixed
Platform
Platform
Track Miles
Substations
Track Miles
Structures
Bridge
$
5,250.00
$
1,800.00
$ 4,620,000.00
$ 77,500,000.00
$ 3,520,000.00
$ 6,472,800.00
$ 9,200,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
0.1354
0.1220
0.1206
0.1169
0.1168
N
N
P
P
P
Y*
P
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
2021
2021
2021
2021
South Norwalk (WB) Platform
East Norwalk (EB) Platform
East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Westport (EB) Platform
Stratford (WB) Platform
Milford (WB) Platform
New Haven State Street Platform
Glenbrook Platform
08072R
08154R
08261R
08266R
08269R
01312R
01318R
01348R
01403R
02237R
03638R
03639R
03680R
03686R
03691R
03693R
03946R
03948R
03955R
04197R
04224R
04232R
04235R
1
1
6
5
4
870
1
Project Number
03010195PE
03020014PE
03000190 (C Program)
03010072CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000175
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,400,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,300,000.00
1,800,000.00
1,300,000.00
13,800,000.00
15,500,000.00
12,300,000.00
13,700,000.00
28,700,000.00
20,000,000.00
14,300,000.00
14,600,000.00
25,800,000.00
8,400,000.00
33,000,000.00
12,900,000.00
14,300,000.00
7,400,000.00
8,900,000.00
4,200,000.00
9,000,000.00
13,800,000.00
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
0.1300
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
1 Bridge 08015R
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
1
Bridge
$
4,600,000.00
0.1418
N
1 Bridge 08003R
1 Bridge 08006R
1 Bridge 08012R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 8,000,000.00
$ 7,000,000.00
$ 19,200,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08022R
1 Bridge 08035R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 11,700,000.00
$ 8,200,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
Y
P
03000196CN
03000175
2021
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08050R
1 Bridge 08055R
1 Bridge 08059R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 12,200,000.00
$ 10,200,000.00
$ 20,400,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08060R
1 Bridge 08070R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 10,700,000.00
$ 13,000,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08071R
1 Bridge 08074R
1 Bridge 08075R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 12,600,000.00
$ 14,300,000.00
$ 18,100,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08086R
1 Bridge 08097R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 7,000,000.00
$ 12,800,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
Y
P
03000196CN
03000175
2021
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08098R
1 Bridge 08200R
1 Bridge 08207R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 12,000,000.00
$ 7,900,000.00
$ 2,700,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
Y
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08209R
1 Bridge 08210R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
1,300,000.00
5,400,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08217R
1 Bridge 08218R
1 Bridge 08219R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
$
1,100,000.00
1,000,000.00
1,100,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
1 Bridge 08264R
1 Bridge 08267R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 41,300,000.00
$ 10,300,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08268R
1 Bridge 08279R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
0.1418
0.1418
Y
P
03000196CN
03000175
Fully Funded
Not Authorized
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
Project Completed (Data Out of Date)
Description
No. of
Units
2021
2021
Y
N
P
*
Asset Name
5,300,000.00
2,100,000.00
Project Number
Scenario 3
F-19
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 3 - Bus (State Match, State Bond, and Lets Go CT)
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2018
2018
1 NWLKTD 1-2004 Ford Econoline E350
1 NWLKTD 2-2004 Ford Econoline E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
9
1
634,653
70,517
4.8544
4.8544
Y
Y
DOT0412 *
DOT0412*
Project Number
2018
2018
2018
3 HART 1-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
4 HART 2-2007 Ford E450/StarTrans
4 NWCTD 1-2007 Ford Startrans
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
6
2
1
423,102
141,034
70,517
2.5390
2.5390
2.5390
Y
Y
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
Various
2018
2018
6 NECTD 1-2008 Ford Startrans
6 NECTD 2-2008 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
2
70,517
141,034
1.9768
1.9768
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
2018
6 NECTD 3-2008 Ford Van
6 NWLKTD 3-2008 Ford Startrans
6 WRTD 1-2008 Ford Supreme
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
2
1
1
141,034
70,517
70,517
1.9768
1.9768
1.9768
P
Y
Y
Various
DOT0412
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
11 HART 1999 Ford Econoline
12 CTTransit New Haven 2000 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
Service-Van
Service-Van
1
1
46,182
46,182
1.6632
1.6372
P
P
DOT0416
Various
2018
2018
2018
12 CTTransit Stamford 2000 Chevrolet 2500 cargo
14 NWCTD 2-2009 Ford Supreme
14 WRTD 2-2009 Ford Startrans
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
7
1
46,182
493,619
70,517
1.6372
1.4948
1.4948
P
P
Y
Various
Various
DOT04740091RS
2018
2018
14 WRTD 3-2009 Ford Startrans Van
17 SEAT 2004 Ford Explorer
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
1
1
70,517
32,715
1.4948
1.3911
Y
P
DOT04740091RS
DOT0414
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
18
19
20
21
21
21
21
25
26
26
28
28
28
31
32
33
33
33
33
37
38
39
40
41
41
41
41
41
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Service-Van
Service-Van
Service-Truck
Service-Auto
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Truck
Service-SUV
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
10
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
4
3
6
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
32,715
19,679
46,182
70,517
141,034
70,517
282,068
705,170
39,358
19,679
92,364
46,182
46,182
167,775
39,358
70,517
282,068
211,551
423,102
65,430
39,358
335,550
32,715
70,517
70,517
70,517
70,517
282,068
1.2806
1.2797
1.2794
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
1.0813
0.9972
0.9972
0.9970
0.9970
0.9970
0.8932
0.8309
0.7266
0.7266
0.7266
0.7266
0.6555
0.6549
0.5069
0.4768
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
P
P
P
Y
Y
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
DOT0412
Various
DOT0416
DOT0478
DOT0478
Various
Various
DOT0412*
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
DOT0410
Various
DOT0478
Various
Various
DOT04740091RS
DOT0416
DOT0410
Various
DOT0410
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0410
2018
2018
2018
41 NWCTD 4-2012 Ford E450
41 VTD 1-2012 Ford Supreme
41 WRTD 6-2012 Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
3
14
2
211,551
987,238
141,034
0.4219
0.4219
0.4219
P
Y
P
Various
DOT00360199RS
Various
2018
2018
2018
49 CTTransit Stamford 2011 Ford Escape
49 ETD 2011 Ford Escape
49 GBTA 2011 Chevrolet Tahoe
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
3
1
2
98,145
32,715
65,430
0.3031
0.3031
0.3031
P
P
P
Various
DOT0478
DOT0410
2018
2018
52 CTTransit New Haven 2011 Ford Escape
53 CTTransit Hartford 1995 International Service Truck
Service-SUV
Service-Truck
5
1
163,575
167,775
0.3031
0.2897
P
P
Various
Various
2018
2018
2018
53 CTTransit Waterbury 1995 International Service Truck
55 CTTransit Stamford 1997 M8-Rack Body & Plow
56 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
Facility-Fire
1
1
1
167,775
167,775
1,064,196
0.2897
0.2126
0.1709
P
P
P
Various
Various
DOT0412
2018
2018
57 ETD 10-2013 Ford Goshen F550
57 ETD 8-2013 Ford E450
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
2
70,517
141,034
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0478
2018
2018
57 ETD 9-2013 Ford Goshen E450 28 FT
57 GNHTD 1-2013 Ford E350 Goshen
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
1
13
70,517
916,721
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0427*
2018
2018
57 GNHTD 2-2013 Ford E450 Goshen
57 HART 3-2013 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
9
282,068
634,653
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
DOT0427
DOT0416
2018
2018
2018
57 WRTD 7-2013 Goshen Coach
64 CTTransit Hartford 1999 Chevrolet Pick Up
64 VTD 1999 Ford F250 Pickup
Cutaway Bus
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
3
1
1
211,551
167,775
167,775
0.1602
0.1424
0.1424
Y
P
P
DOT04740091RS
Various
DOT00360199EQ
2018
2018
66 CTTransit Stamford 2-2001 New Flyer
66 New Britain 1-2001 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2
1
848,172
424,086
0.0973
0.0973
Y
Y
DOT0403
Various
NWLKTD 2005 Ford Freestyle
NWLKTD 2005 Ford Sedan 500 AW
HART 2005 Ford E350
ETD 1-2010 Ford E450
ETD 2-2010 Ford E450
NECTD 4-2010 Ford Startrans
NECTD 5-2010 Ford Startrans
NWLKTD 4-2010 Ford Phoenix E450
CTTransit New Haven 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit Stamford 2007 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit Hartford 2007 Chevrolet Cargo minivan
CTTransit Stamford 2007 Chevrolet CG23405 Cargo
CTTransit Waterbury 2007 Ford E150
GBTA 1982 GMC TOW truck
CTTransit Hartford 2008 Toyota hybrid
ETD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
NWCTD 3-2011 Ford Startrans
WRTD 4-2011 Ford Startrans
WRTD 5-2011 Ford Startrans Vans
HART 2009 Ford Escape
GBTA 2009 Toyota Camry
CTTransit Stamford 1990 M7-Plow/Dump and Sand Truck
GBTA 2010 GMC Terrain SLE
ETD 4-2012 Ford F550
ETD 5-2012 Ford Goshen E450
ETD 6-2012 Ford Phoenix
ETD 7-2012 Ford Startrans E450 28 FT
GBTA 1-2012 Ford Goshen
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2018
68 NWLKTD 2001 Ford Utility Truck
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0796
P
DOT0412
Project Number
2018
2018
69 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
70 GBTA 4-2003 New Flyer
Facility-Electrical
Transit Bus
1
2
1,368,252
848,172
0.0781
0.0581
P
Y
DOT0412
DOT0410
2018
2018
2018
70 GBTA 5-2003 New Flyer
70 NWLKTD 6-2003 Orion VII
70 SEAT 2-2003 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
3
19
1
1,272,258
8,057,634
424,086
0.0581
0.0581
0.0581
Y
P
P
DOT0410
DOT0412
DOT0414
2018
2018
70 SEAT 3-2003 New Flyer
75 CTTransit New Haven 3-2004 New Flyer
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
41
424,086
17,387,526
0.0581
0.0402
P
Y
DOT0414
Various
2018
2018
2018
75 Dattco 1-2004 New Flyer
75 MlfdTD 3-2004 New Flyer
75 NWLKTD 7-2004 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
1
3
424,086
424,086
1,272,258
0.0402
0.0402
0.0402
Y
P
P
Various
DOT0424
DOT0412
2018
2018
75 SEAT 4-2004 Gillig
80 CTTransit Hartford 2003 Freightliner Service Patrol
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
1
1
424,086
167,775
0.0402
0.0247
P
P
DOT0414
Various
2018
80 GBTA 2003 GMC 4500Dump Truck
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0247
P
DOT0410
2019
1 HART 4-2014 Ford E450/ Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
4
282,068
0.1602
Y
DOT0416
2019
2019
1 HART 5-2014 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
1 NWLKTD 5-2014 Chevrolet Pegasus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
3
10
211,551
705,170
0.1602
0.1602
Y
P
DOT0416
DOT0424
2019
2019
2019
4 CTTransit Hartford 3-2005 New Flyer
5 GBTA 2004 Skid Steer
5 HART 2004 Ford F450
Transit Bus
Service-Truck
Service-Truck
48
1
1
20,356,128
167,775
167,775
0.0402
0.0247
0.0247
Y
P
P
Various
DOT0410
DOT0416
3
2
3
3
2
2
1,272,258
848,172
1,272,258
1,272,258
848,172
973,214
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0234
0.0148
Y
Y
Y
Y
P
Y
DOT0412
DOT0414
DOT0414
DOT0414
Various
Various
4
11
3
10
1
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
64
10
282,068
775,687
211,551
705,170
32,715
130,860
32,715
59,037
92,364
17,940,583
15,370
9,865
468,384
801,960
2,706,000
3,936,000
580,560
1,830,240
27,141,504
4,240,860
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
0.1423
0.1423
0.1423
0.1419
0.1418
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0314
0.0234
0.0234
Y
Y
Y
Y
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
P
Y
Y
P
Y
Y
DOT0478
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0422
Various
Various
DOT0410
Various
Various
DOT04010017CN
DOT0416
DOT0422
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0410
DOT04270056CN
DOT0414
DOT0400
DOT0427
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
7
7
7
7
7
12
NWLKTD 8-2006 Gillig
SEAT 5-2006 Gillig
SEAT 6-2006 New Flyer
SEAT 7-2006 New Flyer
WRTD 8-2006 Gillig
CTTransit Stamford 5-2003 MCI
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Over-the-Road Bus
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
2020
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
8
9
10
10
10
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
ETD 11-2015 Ford E450 Phoenix
GNHTD 3-2015 Ford E350 Goshen
GNHTD 4-2015 Ford E450 Goshen
MAT 1-2015 Goshen E350
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford Escape
CTTransit Waterbury 2014 Chevrolet Traverse
GBTA 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe
CTTransit Hartford 2014 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
CTTransit New Haven 2014 Ford E350 shuttle van
CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
HART Passenger Facility 1
MAT Parking 1
CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
GBTA Maint 1
GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
SEAT Admin/Maint 1
CTTransit Hartford 4-2007 New Flyer
HART 10-2007 Gillig
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-Auto
Service-Van
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Facility-Equipment
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
2020
19 SEAT 8-2007 New Flyer
Transit Bus
6
2,544,516
0.0234
P
DOT0416
2020
2020
2020
19 SEAT 9-2007 New Flyer
23 CTTransit Hartford Admin/Maintenance 1
23 CTTransit Hartford Fuel Cell Storage 1
Transit Bus
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
2
1
1
848,172
3,588,117
93,677
0.0234
0.0143
0.0143
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0400
DOT0400
2020
2020
23 CTTransit Stamford Office/Storage 1
23 GBTA Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
541,200
787,200
0.0143
0.0143
P
Y
DOT0400
DOT0410
2020
2020
2020
23 GNHTD Admin/Maint 1
23 MAT Parking 1
29 CTTransit Stamford Maintenance 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
1
116,112
39,459
160,392
0.0143
0.0143
0.0143
Y
P
P
DOT04270056CN
DOT0422
DOT0400
2020
2020
29 HART Passenger Facility 1
29 NWLKTD Admin/Maint 1
Facility-Conveyance
Facility-Conveyance
1
1
61,482
608,112
0.0143
0.0143
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0412
2020
2020
2020
29 SEAT Admin/Maint 1
33 CTTransit Hartford 5-2008 New Flyer
33 New Britain 2-2008 New Flyer
Facility-Conveyance
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
1
2
1
366,048
848,172
424,086
0.0143
0.0077
0.0077
P
Y
Y
DOT0414
DOT0400
DOT0400
2020
2020
33 NWLKTD 10-2008 Gillig
33 NWLKTD 9-2008 Gillig
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
4
3
1,696,344
1,272,258
0.0077
0.0077
P
P
DOT0412
DOT0412
2020
2020
2020
33 SEAT 10-2008 New Flyer
33 WRTD 9-2008 Gillig
39 GNHTD 8-2015 Dodge Caravan
Transit Bus
Transit Bus
Van
2
3
4
848,172
1,272,258
184,728
0.0077
0.0077
0.0063
P
Y
Y
DOT0414
DOTO4740091RS
DOT0427
2020
2020
40 Nason/Kelley 1-2007 MCI
41 CTTransit Hartford 2015 Ford Interceptor
Over-the-Road Bus
Service-SUV
1
4
486,607
130,860
0.0041
0.0009
Y
P
DOT0400
Various
2020
2020
42 CTTransit Hartford 2015 GMC Savana Parts Van
42 SEAT 2015 Dodge Caravan
Service-Van
Service-Van
3
1
138,546
46,182
0.0005
0.0005
P
P
Various
DOT0410
Program
Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of Units
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2020
44 CTTransit Waterbury 2006 Chevrolet Dump Truck
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0002
P
Various
Project Number
2020
44 SEAT 2006 RAM Pickup
Service-Truck
1
167,775
0.0002
P
DOT0410
2021
2021
2021
1 CTTransit Waterbury 4-2016 Ford E450
1 GNHTD 5-2016 Ford Goshen E350
1 HART 6-2016 Ford E450/Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
22
18
1
1,551,374
1,269,306
70,517
0.1602
0.1602
0.1602
Y
Y
P
DOT0400
DOT0427
DOT0416
2021
2021
1 HART 7-2016 Ford E350/ Goshen Coach
1 HART 8-2016 Ford E350/Goshen Coach
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
4
5
282,068
352,585
0.1602
0.1602
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
2021
2021
2021
1 MlfdTD 1-2016 Ford E450
1 SEAT 1-2016 Ford Phoenix E450
8 MlfdTD 4-2009 New Flyer
Cutaway Bus
Cutaway Bus
Transit Bus
8
5
4
564,136
352,585
1,696,344
0.1602
0.1602
0.0077
P
P
P
DOT0424
DOT0414
DOT0424
2021
2021
9 GNHTD 9-2016 Dodge Caravan
10 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Escape
Van
Service-SUV
2
1
92,364
32,715
0.0063
0.0009
Y
P
DOT0427
Various
2021
2021
2021
10 HART 2016 Ford Escape
10 HART 2016 Ford Explorer
10 NWLKTD 2016 Ford Explorer
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
1
1
2
32,715
32,715
65,430
0.0009
0.0009
0.0009
P
P
P
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0412
2021
2021
10 VTD 2016 Ford Escape
10 WRTD 2016 Jeep Patriot
Service-SUV
Service-SUV
1
1
32,715
32,715
0.0009
0.0009
P
P
DOT00360199EQ
Various
2021
2021
16 CTTransit Hartford 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
16 CTTransit New Haven 2016 Ford Fusion 4 door sedan
Service-Auto
Service-Auto
2
1
39,358
19,679
0.0006
0.0006
P
P
Various
Various
*
Y
P
Replacement in PY18
Programmed in Capital Plan
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
Transit Cooperative Research Program - Transit Asset Prioritization Tool (modified for DOT use)
Program List: Scenario 3 - Rail (State Match, State Bond, and Lets Go CT)
Program Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of
Units
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2018
2018
1 East Norwalk (EB) Platform
1 East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
10,995.00
10,995.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
Project Number
2018
2018
1 Wilton Platform
4 Greenwich (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
2,625.00
10,120.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
4 Greenwich (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
1
Platform
$
10,120.00
0.4889
N
2018
2018
4 Riverside (EB) Platform
4 Riverside (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
53,900.00
53,900.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
4 Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
4 Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
2,622.00
2,622.00
0.4889
0.4889
Y
Y
03010170CN
03010170CN
2018
4 Darien (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
1
Platform
$
875.00
0.4889
P
03010195PE
2018
2018
4 Darien (WB) Platform
4 Rowayton (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
875.00
7,660.00
0.4889
0.4889
P
N
03010195PE
2018
2018
4 Rowayton (WB) Platform
4 Fairfield (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
7,660.00
15,400.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
4 Fairfield (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
1
Platform
$
15,400.00
0.4889
N
2018
2018
4 Milford (EB) Platform
4 Milford (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
13,182.50
13,182.50
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
4 West Haven (EB) Platform
4 West Haven (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
200.00
200.00
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
2018
2018
2018
4 Cannondale Platform
4 Branchville Platform
4 Redding Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
17,500.00
38,400.00
13,200.00
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
29,300.00
400.00
94,450.00
94,450.00
10,382.50
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
0.4889
N
N
N
N
N
Platform
Vehicles
Track Miles
Track Miles
Platform
$
10,382.50
$ 15,865,974.00
$ 51,694,835.66
$ 42,158,750.00
$
49,450.00
0.4889
0.3977
0.2815
0.2808
0.2738
N
N
P
P
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
4
4
25
25
25
Bethel Platform
Clinton Platform
Southport (EB) Platform
Southport (WB) Platform
Stratford (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
25
29
30
31
32
Stratford (WB) Platform
MNR 1960 MK Corp/FL9M
Track-Curved
Track-Turnouts
Cos Cob (EB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Locomotive - MNR
Track - Curved
Track - Turnouts
Platform - Electrical
1
6
26
58
1
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
32
32
32
32
32
Cos Cob (WB) Platform
Stamford (A) Platform
Greens Farms (EB) Platform
Greens Farms (WB) Platform
Danbury Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
49,450.00
1,100.00
73,450.00
73,450.00
18,100.00
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
N
N
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
32
32
32
32
32
Ansonia Platform
Beacon Falls Platform
Naugatuck Platform
Branford (EB) Platform
Branford (WB) Platform
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
Platform - Electrical
1
1
1
1
1
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
1,050.00
525.00
1,750.00
6,650.00
6,650.00
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
0.2738
N
N
N
N
N
2018
2018
2018
2018
43
44
45
46
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Equipment
Power Substations
Power - Substations
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Conveyance
Track Surfacing
Track - Surfacing
Platform
Substations
Building
Track Miles
$
506,240.00
$ 170,500,000.00
$
101,248.00
$ 7,398,600.00
0.2481
0.2476
0.2372
0.2260
P
P
P
P
03000138CN
03010072CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
5
9
9
9
12
13
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
21
22
22
22
22
Track Tangent
Track - Tangent
MNR 1971 GMC EMD/AMF GP40
Locomotive - MNR
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Fire
Tower Wire Car
Service - Rail
MNR East Norwalk Station
Facility - Electrical
MNR Greenwich Station
Facility - Electrical
MNR Riverside Station
Facility - Electrical
MNR Rowayton Station
Facility - Electrical
MNR Milford (EB) Station
Facility - HVAC
MNR Milford (WB) Station
Facility - HVAC
MNR Southport Station
Facility - HVAC
MNR Riverside Station
Facility - Interior
Track Surfacing
Track - Surfacing
Track Curved
Track - Curved
New Haven (C) Platform
Platform - Canopy
Talmadge Hill Platform
Platform - Canopy
New Canaan Platform
Platform - Canopy
Derby Platform
Platform - Canopy
Ansonia Platform
Platform - Canopy
Seymour Platform
Platform - Canopy
Turnouts
Track - Turnouts
Greenwich (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Greenwich (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Old Greenwich (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Noroton Heights (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Track Miles
Vehicles
Buildings
Vehicle
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
Track Miles
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Track Miles
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.2141
0.2055
0.2003
0.1927
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1855
0.1762
0.1576
0.1477
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
0.1471
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
P
N
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
N
N
N
Y
03000190 (C Program)
1
11
1
59
48
6
177
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
105
21
1
1
1
1
1
1
48
1
1
1
1
66,000,000.00
15,865,974.00
177,184.00
150,000.00
1,184.56
354,264.56
354,264.56
5,745.48
1,583.18
323,907.27
365.70
517,771.28
13,167,000.00
41,753,521.11
150.00
37,400.00
3,200.00
6,909.00
6,962.50
3,040.00
34,890,000.00
209,900.00
209,900.00
77,600.00
55,000.00
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03010170CN
Program Year
Project
Rank
Description
No. of
Units
Unit
Replacement
Costs
PI
Programmed
2019
2019
22 Noroton Heights (WB) Platform
22 Darien (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
55,000.00
321,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
Y
P
03010170CN
03010195PE
2019
2019
22 Darien (WB) Platform
22 Rowayton (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
321,000.00
47,850.00
0.1448
0.1448
P
N
03010195PE
2019
22 Rowayton (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
1
Platform
$
47,850.00
0.1448
N
2019
2019
22 South Norwalk (EB) Platform
22 South Norwalk (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
115,800.00
115,800.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
22 East Norwalk (EB) Platform
22 East Norwalk (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
53,400.00
53,400.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
22 Westport (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
1
Platform
$
49,050.00
0.1448
N
2019
2019
22 Westport (WB) Platform
22 Fairfield (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
49,050.00
35,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
22 Fairfield (WB) Platform
22 Bridgeport (EB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
35,000.00
450.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
22 Bridgeport (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
1
Platform
$
450.00
0.1448
N
2019
2019
22 Stratford (EB) Platform
22 Stratford (WB) Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
22,500.00
22,500.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
2019
22 Milford (WB) Platform
22 New Haven State Street Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
33,000.00
10,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
N
2019
22 Glenbrook Platform
Platform - Structure
1
Platform
$
25,400.00
0.1448
N
2019
2019
22 Springdale Platform
22 Merritt 7 Platform
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
1
1
Platform
Platform
$
$
18,500.00
16,500.00
0.1448
0.1448
N
Y
03020014PE
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
22
22
22
22
52
Wilton Platform
Derby Platform
Ansonia Platform
Seymour Platform
Ties-Wood
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Platform - Structure
Ties - Wood
1
1
1
1
6
Platform
Platform
Platform
Platform
Track Miles
$
$
$
$
$
50,000.00
2,000.00
5,250.00
1,800.00
4,620,000.00
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
0.1448
0.1354
N
N
N
N
P
03000190 (C Program)
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
53
54
55
56
56
Power-Substations
Ties-Concrete
Power-Poles
Bridge 08154R
Bridge 08015R
Power - Substations
5
Ties - Concrete
4
Power - Poles
870
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
1
Bridge - Culvert/Pedestrian
1
Substations
Track Miles
Structures
Bridge
Bridge
$ 77,500,000.00
$ 3,520,000.00
$ 6,472,800.00
$ 1,500,000.00
$ 4,600,000.00
0.1220
0.1206
0.1169
0.1168
0.1168
P
P
Y*
N
N
03010072CN
03000190 (C Program)
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
56
56
56
56
56
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
01318R
03638R
04232R
08006R
08070R
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 15,500,000.00
$ 20,000,000.00
$ 9,000,000.00
$ 7,000,000.00
$ 13,000,000.00
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
P
P
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
56
56
56
66
66
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
08086R
08098R
08287R
08072R
08261R
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Culvert/Pedestrian
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$ 7,000,000.00
$ 12,000,000.00
$ 9,200,000.00
$ 3,400,000.00
$ 1,300,000.00
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
Y
P
P
N
N
03000196CN
03000175
03000175
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
66
66
66
66
66
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
08269R
01312R
01348R
01403R
02237R
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
$
$
$
1,300,000.00
13,800,000.00
12,300,000.00
13,700,000.00
28,700,000.00
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
N
P
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
101
101
101
101
101
101
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
03639R
03680R
03686R
03691R
03693R
03946R
03948R
03955R
04197R
04224R
04235R
08012R
08035R
08003R
08022R
08050R
08055R
08059R
08060R
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
14,300,000.00
14,600,000.00
25,800,000.00
8,400,000.00
33,000,000.00
12,900,000.00
14,300,000.00
7,400,000.00
8,900,000.00
4,200,000.00
13,800,000.00
19,200,000.00
8,200,000.00
8,000,000.00
11,700,000.00
12,200,000.00
10,200,000.00
20,400,000.00
10,700,000.00
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
0.1168
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Y
P
P
P
P
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
Bridge - Moveable
1
Bridge
$ 750,000,000.00
0.1300
N
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
0.1418
N
P
P
P
P
P
Y
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
Asset Name
19 Bridge 08080R Devon Movable
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
Bridge
08266R
08071R
08074R
08075R
08097R
08200R
08207R
- Culvert/Pedestrian
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
- Fixed
1,800,000.00
12,600,000.00
14,300,000.00
18,100,000.00
12,800,000.00
7,900,000.00
2,700,000.00
Project Number
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000175
03000196CN
Program Year
Project
Rank
Asset Name
Description
No. of
Units
Replacement
Costs
Unit
PI
Programmed
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08209R
1 Bridge 08210R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
1,300,000.00
5,400,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
Project Number
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08217R
1 Bridge 08218R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$
$
1,100,000.00
1,000,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
2021
1 Bridge 08219R
Bridge - Fixed
1
Bridge
$
1,100,000.00
0.1418
P
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08263R
1 Bridge 08264R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 16,800,000.00
$ 41,300,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
P
03000175
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08267R
1 Bridge 08268R
Bridge - Fixed
Bridge - Fixed
1
1
Bridge
Bridge
$ 10,300,000.00
$ 5,300,000.00
0.1418
0.1418
P
Y
03000175
03000196CN
2021
1 Bridge 08274R
Bridge - Fixed
1
Bridge
$
1,000,000.00
0.1418
P
03000175
2021
2021
1 Bridge 08279R
20 MNR Fairfield (WB) Station
Bridge - Fixed
Facility - Electrical
1
1
Bridge
Building
$
$
2,100,000.00
631,314.27
0.1418
0.1240
P
N
03000175
2021
2021
21 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Plumbing
21 MNR East Norwalk Station
Facility - Plumbing
1
1
Building
Building
$
$
101,248.00
91.12
0.1240
0.1240
P
N
03000138CN
2021
21 MNR Seymour Station
1
Building
$
27,251.12
0.1240
N
2021
2021
21 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - HVAC
21 MNR Riverside Station
Facility - HVAC
1
1
Building
Building
$
$
227,808.00
272,511.20
0.1240
0.1240
P
N
03000138CN
2021
2021
21 MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Electrical
21 MNR Fairfield (EB) Station
Facility - Electrical
1
1
Building
Building
$
$
227,808.00
354,264.56
0.1240
0.1240
P
N
03000138CN
2021
28 MNR Cos Cob Station
Facility - Electrical
1
Building
$
904.83
0.1240
N
2021
2021
28 MNR Greens Farms Station
31 Track Tangent
Facility - Electrical
Track - Tangent
1
26
Building
Track Miles
$
1,776.71
$ 35,750,000.00
0.1240
0.1200
N
P
03000190 (C Program)
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
32
33
34
34
38
Tamper
MNR Bridgeport Rail Facility Building
MNR New Haven - Diesel-CSR Shop
MNR New Haven - Blowing Area Shelter
MNR New Haven - EMU Maintenance Shop
Service - Rail
Facility - Equipment
Facility - Equipment
Facility - Equipment
Facility - Equipment
1
1
1
1
1
Vehicle
Building
Building
Building
Building
$
$
$
$
$
150,000.00
2,892,800.00
3,380,960.00
526,128.00
5,225,120.00
0.1144
0.1141
0.1141
0.1141
0.1141
N
N
P
P
P
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
39
40
40
40
40
MNR New Haven Station
Facility - Substructure
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Shell
MNR Stamford Station
Facility - Shell
MNR Wilton Station
Facility - Shell
MNR Branchville Station
Facility - Interior
1
1
1
1
1
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
$ 23,396,255.44
$
531,552.00
$ 2,600,214.00
$
4,547.33
$
517,771.28
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
N
P
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
40
40
40
40
40
MNR Cannondale Station
MNR Derby Station
MNR New Haven Station
MNR Noroton Heights Station
MNR Rowayton Station
1
1
1
1
1
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
$
517,771.28
$
517,771.28
$ 24,696,047.41
$
517,771.28
$
8,397.24
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
N
N
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
40
51
51
51
51
MNR Seymour Station
Facility - Interior
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Substructure
MNR Derby Station
Facility - Substructure
MNR Bridgeport (WB) Station
Facility - Shell
MNR Noroton Heights Station
Facility - Shell
1
1
1
1
1
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
$
$
$
$
$
517,771.28
329,056.00
490,520.16
574,299.99
817,533.60
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
N
P
N
N
N
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
51
51
51
51
59
MNR Rowayton Station
Facility - Shell
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building Facility - Interior
MNR Danbury Station
Facility - Interior
MNR Wilton Station
Facility - Interior
Facility - Conveyance
MNR New Haven - Diesel-CSR Shop
1
1
1
1
1
Building
Building
Building
Building
Building
$
$
$
$
$
13,258.80
329,056.00
406,209.35
2,879.98
676,192.00
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.1140
0.0945
N
P
N
N
P
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
2021
59
62
62
65
66
67
68
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
77
78
79
80
81
81
83
MNR New Haven - EMU Maintenance Shop
MNR Bridgeport Rail Facility Building
MNR New Haven - Blowing Area Shelter
Track Surfacing
Tie Inserter w/ Crane
Power-Cable
Tie Shear
MNR New Haven - Wheel Mill Facility Building
Railroad Flat Well Car
Railroad Box Car
Caboose
Railroad Hopper
Railroad Flat Car
Railroad Storage Box Car
Railroad CC Flat Car
Ties Wood
Ties Concrete
SLE 1993 GE/P40 Genesis
Waterbury Signals
MNR 1974 GE/A Car
MNR 1974 GE/B Car
Wire Reel Car Road
Building
Building
Building
Track Miles
Vehicle
Track Miles
Vehicle
Building
Vehicle
Vehicles
Vehicle
Vehicles
Vehicle
Vehicle
Vehicle
Track Miles
Track Miles
Vehicles
Track Miles
Vehicles
Vehicles
Vehicle
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,045,024.00
578,560.00
105,225.60
8,276,400.00
150,000.00
51,701,760.00
150,000.00
151,872.00
150,000.00
750,000.00
150,000.00
4,200,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
45,430,000.00
6,160,000.00
31,731,948.00
73,000,000.06
47,597,922.00
47,597,922.00
150,000.00
0.0945
0.0945
0.0945
0.0855
0.0823
0.0817
0.0777
0.0760
0.0731
0.0731
0.0731
0.0731
0.0731
0.0731
0.0731
0.0718
0.0572
0.0354
0.0307
0.0138
0.0138
0.0111
P
N
P
P
N
Y*
N
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
P
P
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
P
*
Facility - Plumbing
Facility
Facility
Facility
Facility
Facility
- Interior
- Interior
- Interior
- Interior
- Interior
Facility - Conveyance
Facility - Conveyance
Facility - Conveyance
Track - Surfacing
Service - Rail
Power - Cable
Service - Rail
Facility - Site
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Service - Rail
Ties - Wood
Ties - Concrete
Locomotive - SLE
Signal System
EMU
EMU
Service - Rail
Fully Funded
Not Authorized
Partially Funded or Authorized but Not Allocated
Project Completed (Data Out of Date)
1
1
1
66
1
288
1
1
1
5
1
28
1
1
1
59
7
12
26
18
18
1
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000138CN
03000190 (C Program)
03000190 (C Program)
03040016CN
03000200RS
03000200RS
Appendix G. Five Year Capital Plan (FY 2017-2021)
G-1
FFY 2018
PROJECT
DOT0301
DOT0301
DOT0301
DOT0301
DOT0301
DOT03010161CN
DOT03010176CN
DOT03010176RW
DOT03010181CN
DOT0303
DOT0403
DOT0412
DOT0412
DOT0412
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT00360199EQ
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT03000138CN
DOT0301
DOT03010088PE
DOT03010183CN
DOT0310
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0414
DOT0414
DOT01702384
DOT0400
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT03010154
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
ROUTE
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL-NCB
CT Transit
NTD
NTD
NTD
HART
HART
HART
VTD
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
SLE
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
GNHTD
GNHTD
GNHTD
GHTD
GHTD
GHTD
SEAT
SEAT
NA
CT Transit
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Hartford Line
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
TOWN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Greenwich
Stamford
Westport
Norwalk
Norwalk
Norwalk
VARIOUS
Stamford
Norwalk
Norwalk
Norwalk
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Waterbury
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
New Haven
New Haven
New Haven
VARIOUS
Madison
Milford
Milford
Milford
Hamden
Hamden
Hamden
Hartford
Hartford
Hartford
Norwich
Norwich
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Various
FFY18 Total
Fed & State
646,642,032
224,600,000
871,242,032
0
0
0
0
0
12,000,000
153,430,161
0
0
0
0
1,400,000
10,000,000
1,480,000
600,000
160,000
492,302
160,000
500,000
600,000
120,000
2,640,000
360,000
19,000,000
0
0
33,000,000
0
400,000
40,000
300,000
1,500,000
400,000
20,000,000
2,400,000
1,400,000
1,040,000
5,500,000
500,000
360,000
0
3,522,895
3,184,637
0
15,500,000
8,500,000
0
0
20,000,000
0
0
361,645,181
361,645,181
Total Fed
284,996,851
224,600,000
509,596,851
Total State
34,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
30,000,000
18,000,000
3,000,000
46,647,459
20,000,000
55,000,000
4,500,000
5,600,000
350,000
2,500,000
370,000
150,000
40,000
40,000
125,000
150,000
30,000
660,000
90,000
4,750,000
17,000,000
5,000,000
8,250,000
15,000,000
100,000
10,000
75,000
375,000
100,000
5,000,000
600,000
350,000
260,000
1,375,000
125,000
90,000
22,000,000
57,500,000
3,875,000
14,125,000
3,195,596
10,000,000
5,000,000
3,000,000
20,000,000
34,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
30,000,000
18,000,000
15,000,000
200,077,620
20,000,000
55,000,000
4,500,000
5,600,000
1,750,000
12,500,000
1,850,000
750,000
200,000
492,302
200,000
625,000
750,000
150,000
3,300,000
450,000
23,750,000
17,000,000
5,000,000
41,250,000
15,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
1,875,000
500,000
25,000,000
3,000,000
1,750,000
1,300,000
6,875,000
625,000
450,000
22,000,000
3,522,895
3,184,637
57,500,000
19,375,000
22,625,000
3,195,596
10,000,000
25,000,000
3,000,000
20,000,000
2017-2021 Capital Plan - Public Transportation
Constrained
34,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
30,000,000
18,000,000
15,000,000
700,000,000
80,000,000
190,000,000
4,500,000
5,600,000
1,750,000
12,500,000
1,850,000
750,000
200,000
492,302
200,000
625,000
750,000
150,000
3,300,000
450,000
100,000,000
17,000,000
5,000,000
41,250,000
15,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
1,875,000
500,000
25,000,000
3,000,000
1,750,000
1,300,000
6,875,000
625,000
450,000
22,000,000
3,522,895
3,184,637
57,500,000
19,375,000
22,625,000
3,195,596
10,000,000
25,000,000
3,000,000
20,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Funding (Non Ramp Up) Programmed in Current Year
Total Ramp Up Funding Programmed in Current Year
Total Funding Programmed in Current Year
DESCRIPTION
Bridge Replacement Program-East Ave Bridge, Norwalk
Bridge Replacement Program-Osborne Ave Bridge,Norwalk
Bridge Replacement Program-Fort Point St Bridge,Norwalk
NHL Bridge Repair-Cos Cob
Stamford Parking/Pedestrian Bridge
Maple Lane Bridge (moved to 2018)
NHL - WALK Moveable Bridge
NHL - WALK Moveable Bridge ROW
NHL - CP 243 (WALK Bridge)
New Canaan Branch Improvements
Route 1 BRT - Norwalk/Stamford (Buses)
Norwalk TD Replace 2006 Buses (3 35ft)
Norwalk TD - Facility Improvements
Norwalk TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
HART -Paratransit Vehicles FY 18
HART Admin Capital/Misc Support
HART Operating Assitance
NVCOG/VTD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
GBTA Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
GBTA - Radio System Replacement
GBTA - Bridgeport Intermodal Center Improvements
GBTA - Rehab Bus Storage Garage
GBTA - Facility Improvements - Bus Hub
NHY - West End Yard
New Haven Station /Parking
NHY - Continued Design and Program Management
NHY - Pedestrian Bridge-North
SLE-Madison RR Station and Garage
Milford TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 18
Milford TD Facility Improvements
Milford TD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
GNHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 18
GNHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
GNHTD New Facility
GHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 18
GHTD Union Station
GHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support
SEAT Replace Buses 2006 (2 30ft/3 35ft/3 40ft)
SEAT Admin Capital FY 18
Transit Capital Planning
Bus Service Expansion Fleet
Section 5310 Program - FFY 2018 (See Program of Projects)
Section 5311 Program - FFY 2018 (See Program of Projects)
Hartford Line
NHL - Signal System Replacement Phase 3
NHL - Station Improvement Program (3000191PE projects)
S program/Timber Program
Bridge Replacement Program
New Haven Line Track Program
Grade Crossing Renewal Program
NHL Stations (Orange/Barnum/Merritt 7)
1 of 2
STATE
STATE
STATE
Ramp Up
Ramp Up
5307/5337
ER/5337
STATE
STATE
Ramp Up
Ramp Up
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307/5337
Ramp Up
STATE
5307/5337
Ramp Up
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
Ramp Up
5310
5311
Ramp Up
5307/5337
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
5307/5337
STATE
Ramp Up
FUNDING SOURCE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
13
13
70
70
70
70
70
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
REGION
Updated 11/30/16
FFY 2018
PROJECT
DOT03000175PE
DOT03000196CN
DOT03000199CN
DOT03000202CN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT03040016CN
DOT0472
DOT00820317CN
DOT0422
DOT0422
DOT0478
DOT0478
DOT0478
ROUTE
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
CT Transit
CT Transit
NHL-WTRBY
NWTD
Off-System
MAT
MAT
Esutary TD
Esutary TD
Esutary TD
TOWN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Torrington
Middletown
Middletown
Middletown
Centerbrook
Centerbrook
Centerbrook
5,400,000
2,500,000
11,000,000
21,250,000
8,726,294
1,517,688
35,000,000
16,500,000
2,000,000
150,000
350,000
1,800,000
875,000
275,000
871,242,031
FFY18 Total
Fed & State
646,642,032
224,600,000
871,242,032
0
0
0
17,000,000
6,981,035
1,214,150
0
13,200,000
0
120,000
280,000
1,440,000
700,000
220,000
361,645,180
361,645,181
361,645,181
Total Fed
5,400,000
2,500,000
11,000,000
4,250,000
1,745,259
303,538
35,000,000
3,300,000
2,000,000
30,000
70,000
360,000
175,000
55,000
509,596,851
284,996,851
224,600,000
509,596,851
Total State
2017-2021 Capital Plan - Public Transportation
Constrained
5,400,000
2,500,000
11,000,000
21,250,000
8,726,294
1,517,688
35,000,000
16,500,000
2,000,000
150,000
350,000
1,800,000
875,000
275,000
TOTAL:
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Funding (Non Ramp Up) Programmed in Current Year
Total Ramp Up Funding Programmed in Current Year
Total Funding Programmed in Current Year
DESCRIPTION
Bridge Design
Scour Rehabilitation 4 NHL Bridges (moved to 2018 FDP 11/17)
NHL - Customer Service Initiative
Network Infrastructure Upgrade Phase 3 CN
CT Transit Bus Replacements
CT Facility Improvements/Misc Admin Capital
Waterbury Branch Signal System
NWTD Facility
Middletown Swing Bridge (Jan 18)
MAT - Engine overhauls Gilligs
MAT Misc Support
Estuary TD - New Facility Design/ROW
Estuary TD - Bus Replacement
Estuary TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 18
2 of 2
STATE
STATE
STATE
5307/5337
5307/5339
5307
Ramp Up
5307
STATE
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
FUNDING SOURCE
78
78
78
78
79
79
81
3/4
11/12
11/12
11/12
11/12
11/12
11/12
REGION
Updated 11/30/16
FFY 2019
PROJECT
DOT03010176CN
DOT0412
DOT0412
VARIOUS
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0036
DOT0036
DOT00150373CN
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT03000138CN
DOT0301
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0414
DOT0414
DOT01702384
DOT0300
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT03010154
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT03000175PE
DOT03000199CN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT0422
DOT0478
DOT0478
ROUTE
NHL
NTD
NTD
NHL
HART
HART
HART
HART
VTD
VTD
NHL
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
NHL
NHL
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
GNHTD
GNHTD
GHTD
GHTD
GHTD
SEAT
SEAT
NA
NHL/SLE
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Hartford Line
VARIOUS
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
CT Transit
CT Transit
MAT
Esutary TD
Esutary TD
TOWN
Norwalk
Norwalk
Norwalk
VARIOUS
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Waterbury
Waterbury
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
New Haven
New Haven
Milford
Milford
Milford
Hamden
Hamden
Hartford
Hartford
Hartford
Norwich
Norwich
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Middletown
Centerbrook
Centerbrook
136,082,060
1,000,000
675,000
15,000,000
687,500
200,000
492,302
6,250,000
200,000
250,000
22,000,000
3,125,000
450,000
150,000
915,000
45,000,000
30,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
2,300,000
600,000
3,250,000
1,000,000
500,000
5,000,000
625,000
450,000
98,000,000
3,591,944
3,247,056
267,000,000
11,562,500
34,346,063
15,000,000
3,800,000
17,284,409
3,500,000
2,500,000
30,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
27,647,329
6,250,000
325,000
375,000
50,000
824,606,162
FFY19 Total
Fed & State
414,606,161
410,000,000
824,606,161
60,865,648
800,000
540,000
0
550,000
160,000
492,302
5,000,000
160,000
200,000
0
2,500,000
360,000
120,000
732,000
20,000,000
0
400,000
40,000
300,000
1,840,000
480,000
2,600,000
800,000
400,000
4,000,000
500,000
360,000
0
3,591,944
3,247,056
0
9,250,000
27,476,850
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22,117,863
5,000,000
260,000
300,000
40,000
175,483,663
175,483,662
0
175,483,662
Total Fed
75,216,412
200,000
135,000
15,000,000
137,500
40,000
0
1,250,000
40,000
50,000
22,000,000
625,000
90,000
30,000
183,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
100,000
10,000
75,000
460,000
120,000
650,000
200,000
100,000
1,000,000
125,000
90,000
98,000,000
0
0
267,000,000
2,312,500
6,869,213
15,000,000
3,800,000
17,284,409
3,500,000
2,500,000
30,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
5,529,466
1,250,000
65,000
75,000
10,000
649,122,499
239,122,499
410,000,000
649,122,499
Total State
2017-2021 Capital Plan - Public Transportation
Constrained
700,000,000
1,000,000
675,000
15,000,000
687,500
200,000
492,302
6,250,000
200,000
250,000
146,000,000
3,125,000
450,000
150,000
915,000
100,000,000
30,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
2,300,000
600,000
3,250,000
1,000,000
500,000
5,000,000
625,000
450,000
98,000,000
3,591,944
3,247,056
267,000,000
11,562,500
34,346,063
15,000,000
3,800,000
17,284,409
3,500,000
2,500,000
30,000,000
5,000,000
10,000,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
27,647,329
6,250,000
325,000
375,000
50,000
TOTAL:
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Funding (Non Ramp Up) Programmed in Current Year
Total Ramp Up Funding Programmed in Current Year
Total Funding Programmed in Current Year
DESCRIPTION
NHL - WALK Moveable Bridge
Norwalk TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
Norwalk TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
SAGA
HART -Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
HART Admin Capital/Misc Support
HART Operating Assitance
HART - Replace Buses 10 35 ft
NVCOG/VTD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
NVCOG/VTD - Bus Shelter Replacement FY 19
Barnum Station
GBTA Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
GBTA Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
GBTA - Bridgeport Intermodal Center Improvements
GBTA - Midlife Repower/Overhaul 15 Gilligs
NHY - West End Yard
NHY - Design and Program Management
Milford TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
Milford TD Facility Improvements
Milford TD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
GNHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
GNHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
GHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 19
GHTD Union Station
GHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
SEAT Replace Buses 2007 35 ft buses
SEAT Admin Capital FY 19
Transit Capital Planning
Rail Fleet
Section 5310 Program - FFY 2019 (See Program of Projects)
Section 5311 Program - FFY 2019 (See Program of Projects)
Hartford Line
Transit District Bus Replacements
NHL - Signal System Replacement Phase 3
NHL - Station Improvement Program (3000191PE projects)
S program/Timber Program
Bridge Replacement Program
Grade Crossing Renewal Program
Network Infrastructure Upgrade Phase 4 PE
NHL Stations (Orange/Barnum/Merritt 7)
Bridge Design
NHL - Customer Service Initiative
Interlocking & Drainage
Code Compliance Upgrades of Rail Maintenance Facilities
CT Transit Bus Replacements
CT Facility Improvements/Misc Admin Capital
MAT Misc Support
Estuary TD - Bus Replacement
Estuary TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 19
1 of 1
5307/5337
5307
5307
Ramp Up
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
STATE
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307/5337
STATE
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
Ramp Up
5310
5311
Ramp Up
5307
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
Ramp Up
STATE
STATE
STATE
STATE
5307/5339
5307
5307
5307
5307
FUNDING SOURCE
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
13
13
70
70
70
70
70
70
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
11/12
11/12
11/12
REGION
Updated 11/30/16
FFY 2020
PROJECT
DOT03010176CN
DOT0303
DOT0412
DOT0412
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT00360199EQ
DOT00150373CN
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT03000138CN
DOT0310
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0414
DOT0414
DOT01702384
DOT0300
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT03010154
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT0300
DOT03000175
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT0400
DOT0400
DOT0422
DOT0422
DOT0478
DOT0478
VARIOUS
ROUTE
NHL
NHL-NCB
NTD
NTD
HART
HART
HART
HART
VTD
NHL
GBTA
GBTA
GBTA
NHL
SLE
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
GNHTD
GNHTD
GHTD
GHTD
GHTD
SEAT
SEAT
NA
NHL/SLE
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
CT Transit
CT Transit
MAT
MAT
Esutary TD
Esutary TD
Hartford Line
TOWN
Norwalk
VARIOUS
Norwalk
Norwalk
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Waterbury
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
New Haven
Madison
Milford
Milford
Milford
Hamden
Hamden
Hartford
Hartford
Hartford
Norwich
Norwich
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Middletown
Middletown
Centerbrook
Centerbrook
VARIOUS
173,625,455
15,000,000
4,000,000
375,000
750,000
200,000
625,000
492,302
200,000
20,000,000
500,000
150,000
520,000
65,000,000
17,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
2,500,000
750,000
3,250,000
1,000,000
500,000
3,750,000
1,000,000
450,000
435,000,000
3,653,007
3,302,256
25,000,000
5,000,000
7,000,000
6,250,000
6,900,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
5,500,000
8,000,000
4,500,000
9,048,584
11,655,110
1,000,000
350,000
400,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
945,121,714
FFY20 Total
Fed & State
418,121,714
527,000,000
945,121,714
94,900,364
0
3,200,000
300,000
600,000
160,000
500,000
492,302
160,000
0
400,000
120,000
416,000
0
0
400,000
40,000
300,000
2,000,000
600,000
2,600,000
800,000
400,000
3,000,000
800,000
360,000
0
3,653,007
3,302,256
20,000,000
0
0
5,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,238,867
9,324,088
800,000
280,000
320,000
16,000,000
0
178,466,884
178,466,884
178,466,884
Total Fed
78,725,091
15,000,000
800,000
75,000
150,000
40,000
125,000
0
40,000
20,000,000
100,000
30,000
104,000
65,000,000
17,000,000
100,000
10,000
75,000
500,000
150,000
650,000
200,000
100,000
750,000
200,000
90,000
435,000,000
0
0
5,000,000
5,000,000
7,000,000
1,250,000
6,900,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
5,500,000
8,000,000
4,500,000
1,809,717
2,331,022
200,000
70,000
80,000
4,000,000
30,000,000
766,654,830
239,654,830
527,000,000
766,654,830
Total State
2017-2021 Capital Plan - Public Transportation
Constrained
700,000,000
15,000,000
4,000,000
375,000
750,000
200,000
625,000
492,302
200,000
146,000,000
500,000
150,000
520,000
100,000,000
17,000,000
500,000
50,000
375,000
2,500,000
750,000
3,250,000
1,000,000
500,000
3,750,000
1,000,000
450,000
435,000,000
3,653,007
3,302,256
25,000,000
5,000,000
7,000,000
6,250,000
6,900,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
5,500,000
8,000,000
4,500,000
9,048,584
11,655,110
1,000,000
350,000
400,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
TOTAL:
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Funding (Non Ramp Up) Programmed in Current Year
Total Ramp Up Funding Programmed in Current Year
Total Funding Programmed in Current Year
DESCRIPTION
NHL - WALK Moveable Bridge
New Canaan Branch Improvements
Norwalk TD Replace Buses
Norwalk TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
HART -Paratransit Vehicles FY 2020
HART Admin Capital/Misc Support
HART - Midlife overhaul 2014 buses
HART Operating Assitance
NVCOG/VTD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
Barnum Station
GBTA Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 20
GBTA - Bridgeport Intermodal Center Improvements
GBTA - Paratransit Vehicle Replacement
NHY - West End Yard
SLE-Madison RR Station and Garage
Milford TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2020
Milford TD Facility Improvements
Milford TD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
GNHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2020
GNHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
GHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2020
GHTD Union Station
GHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
SEAT Replace Buses 2008 40 ft buses
SEAT Admin Capital FY 2020
Transit Capital Planning
Rail Fleet
Section 5310 Program - FFY 2020 (See Program of Projects)
Section 5311 Program - FFY 2020 (See Program of Projects)
NHL - Signal System Replacement Phase 3
S program/Timber Program
Bridge Replacement Program
New Haven Line Track Program
Grade Crossing Renewal Program
Network Infrastructure Upgrade Phase 4 CN
NHL Stations (Orange/Barnum/Merritt 7)
Bridge Design
Interlocking & Drainage
Code Compliance Upgrades of Rail Maintenance Facilities
CT Transit Bus Replacements
CT Facility Improvements/Misc Admin Capital
MAT - Paratransit Vehicle Replaement
MAT Misc Support
Estuary TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2020
Estuary TD - New Facility
Hartford Line
1 of 1
5307/5337
Ramp Up
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
STATE
5307
5307
5307
STATE
Ramp Up
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
Ramp Up
5310
5311
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
Ramp Up
STATE
STATE
STATE
5339
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
Ramp Up
FUNDING SOURCE
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
5
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
13
13
70
70
70
70
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
11/12
11/12
11/12
11/12
REGION
Updated 11/30/16
FFY 2021
PROJECT
DOT00360199EQ
DOT0400
DOT0412
DOT0414
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT0416
DOT00360199EQ
DOT0410
DOT0410
DOT0424
DOT0300
DOT0412
DOT0424
DOT0424
DOT0427
DOT0427
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0426
DOT0478
DOT0300
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT03010154
DOT01702384
DOT0300
DOT03000175
DOT03010176CN
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
DOT0422
DOT0422
ROUTE
VTD
CT Transit
NTD
NHL
SEAT
HART
HART
HART
VTD
GBTA
GBTA
MLFD TD
NHL
NHL/SLE
NTD
MLFD TD
MLFD TD
GNHTD
GNHTD
GHTD
GHTD
GHTD
Esutary TD
NHL
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Hartford Line
NHL
NA
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
NHL
CT Transit
CT Transit
MAT
MAT
TOWN
Waterbury
VARIOUS
Norwalk
VARIOUS
Norwich
Danbury
Danbury
Danbury
Waterbury
Bridgeport
Bridgeport
Milford
New Haven
VARIOUS
Norwalk
Milford
Milford
Hamden
Hamden
Hartford
Hartford
Hartford
Centerbrook
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Norwalk
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
VARIOUS
Middletown
Middletown
225,000
1,250,000
500,000
30,000,000
750,000
750,000
900,000
492,302
1,250,000
10,460,000
625,000
750,000
75,000,000
200,000,000
1,500,000
50,000
375,000
2,500,000
750,000
3,250,000
1,500,000
750,000
687,500
50,000,000
3,653,007
3,302,256
80,000,000
25,000,000
450,000
15,000,000
4,750,000
121,625,455
4,500,000
12,000,000
25,000,000
10,350,000
6,700,000
20,111,194
30,625,000
250,000
350,000
747,981,714
FFY21 Total
Fed & State
747,981,714
0
747,981,714
180,000
1,000,000
400,000
0
600,000
600,000
720,000
492,302
1,000,000
8,000,000
500,000
600,000
0
0
1,200,000
40,000
300,000
2,000,000
600,000
2,600,000
1,200,000
600,000
550,000
0
3,653,007
3,302,256
0
20,000,000
360,000
12,000,000
0
54,900,364
0
0
20,000,000
0
0
16,088,955
24,500,000
200,000
280,000
178,466,884
178,466,884
0
178,466,884
Total Fed
45,000
250,000
100,000
30,000,000
150,000
150,000
180,000
0
250,000
2,460,000
125,000
150,000
75,000,000
200,000,000
300,000
10,000
75,000
500,000
150,000
650,000
300,000
150,000
137,500
50,000,000
0
0
80,000,000
5,000,000
90,000
3,000,000
4,750,000
66,725,091
4,500,000
12,000,000
5,000,000
10,350,000
6,700,000
4,022,239
6,125,000
50,000
70,000
569,514,830
569,514,830
0
569,514,830
Total State
2017-2021 Capital Plan - Public Transportation
Constrained
225,000
1,250,000
500,000
100,000,000
750,000
750,000
900,000
492,302
1,250,000
10,460,000
625,000
750,000
75,000,000
200,000,000
1,500,000
50,000
375,000
2,500,000
750,000
3,250,000
1,500,000
750,000
687,500
50,000,000
3,653,007
3,302,256
80,000,000
25,000,000
450,000
15,000,000
4,750,000
700,000,000
4,500,000
12,000,000
25,000,000
10,350,000
6,700,000
20,111,194
30,625,000
250,000
350,000
TOTAL:
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Funding (Non Ramp Up) Programmed in Current Year
Total Ramp Up Funding Programmed in Current Year
Total Funding Programmed in Current Year
DESCRIPTION
NVCOG/VTD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
CT Facility Improvements/Misc Admin Capital
Norwalk TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
Bridge Replacement Program-Elm, Canal, Greenwich
SEAT Admin Capital FY 2021
HART -Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
HART Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
HART Operating Assitance
NVCOG/VTD - Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
GBTA Replace Buses
GBTA Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
Milford TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
NHY - Service and Inspection Shop
Rail Fleet
Norwalk TD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
Milford TD Facility Improvements
Milford TD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
GNHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
GNHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
GHTD Paratransit Vehicles FY 2021
GHTD Union Station
GHTD Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
Estuary TD - Admin Capital/Misc Support FY 2021
NHL Stations (Orange/Barnum/Merritt 7)
Section 5310 Program - FFY 2021 (See Program of Projects)
Section 5311 Program - FFY 2021 (See Program of Projects)
Hartford Line
NHL - Signal System Replacement Phase 3
Transit Capital Planning
Network Infrastructure Upgrade Phase 3/4
Bridge Design
NHL - WALK Moveable Bridge
Interlocking & Drainage
Code Compliance Upgrades of Rail Maintenance Facilities
New Haven Line Track Program
NHL - Station Improvement Program (3000191PE projects)
S program/Timber Program
CT Transit Bus Replacements
CT Transit Facility Improvements (Hartford/Stamford)
MAT - Engine overhauls Gilligs
MAT Misc Support
1 of 1
5307
5307
5307
STATE
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
STATE
STATE
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
5307
STATE
5310
5311
STATE
5307/5337
5307
5307/5337
STATE
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
5307/5337
STATE
STATE
5339
5307
5307
5307
FUNDING SOURCE
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
5
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
10
10
10
13
70
70
70
70
77
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
11/12
11/12
REGION
Updated 11/30/16
Appendix H. Equipment over $50,000
H-1
Operator
CT Transit New Haven
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Stamford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit New Haven
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit New Haven
CT Transit Stamford
CT Transit New Haven
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hatrford
CT Transit New Haven
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Waterbury
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Waterbury
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Hartford
CT Transit Waterbury
Electric Farebox System
Electric Farebox System
S&B Farebox System
Hicklin Dynomometr w tranmission stand
HP Eaton Radio Control console
Asset Works -software
Hewlett Packard Server
GFI Genfare
Tester alternator/Generator
Trans-Tech 16 System W/ACC-CLA
Description of Asset
Push Pull Tug
Push Pull Tug
Push Pull Tug
Sentinel Rider Sweeper
Sentinel Rider Sweeper
Scrubber/Sweeper
Scrubber/Sweeper
Scrubber/Sweeper
John Deere Tractor/Loader
John Deere Loader
Hyster Fork Lift Truck
Hyster Fork Lift Truck
Boom Lift
Bus Lift
TIer I
Equipment ($50,000)
ID #
Year acquired
8841
5/24/13
8840
5/24/13
8940
6/30/15
6774
10/1/05
9650
9/19/13
M20-6305
9/19/13
M20-6307
9/19/13
M20-6306
9/19/13
DW444HX566262
9/1/98
1DW524KHCFE667425 3/13/15
K006V01817L
4/24/13
K0069V1816L
4/24/13
30019829
2/20/15
PIN12F0001
7/30/12
9/1/98
235463
9/10/10
AE9LZrjk644cd22z
8/30/10
1/23/17
8/15/17
2UA444260RSP
1/22/15
2020
9/1/97
4/1/94
4/1/94
10/11/17
1,184,528.10
Cost
AGE
$
65,254.00
$
65,245.00
$
87,069.00
$ 132,758.41
$ 181,995.00
$
62,245.64
$
62,245.64
$
62,245.64
$
87,000.00
$ 181,534.00
$
58,000.00
$
58,000.00
$ 129,320.00
$
97,644.00
$ 103,200.00
$ 100,200.00
$ 200,000.00
$
68,722.00
$ 172,075.00
$ 126,907.86
$ 153,936.00
$ 366,598.00
$ 104,015.00
$
5
5
3
13
5
5
5
5
20
3
5
5
3
6
20
8
8
1
1
3
21
24
24
1
March 2018
CORE ID
01210362
01210363
01210375
02300509
02300534
02300531
02300532
02300533
02800539
02800573
04510861
04510862
04510990
05810160
09603378
00501035
09719539
09722256
09800163
09112073
06803691
07407182
07407183
07410107
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Modified | 2018-12-07 |
| File Created | 2018-10-03 |