FR2590_20191122_omb

Supporting Statement for the
Single-Counterparty Credit Limits
(FR 2590; OMB No. 7100-NEW)
Summary
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), under authority
delegated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has implemented the SingleCounterparty Credit Limits (FR 2590; OMB No. 7100-NEW) reporting form, associated notice
requirements, and recordkeeping requirements. The FR 2590 is being implemented in connection
with the Board’s single-counterparty credit limits rule (SCCL rule),1 which has been codified in
the Board’s Regulation YY - Enhanced Prudential Standards (12 CFR 252).2
The information collected by the Single-Counterparty Credit Limits reporting form
(FR 2590) will allow the Board to monitor a covered company’s or a covered foreign entity’s
compliance with the SCCL rule. A covered company is any U.S. bank holding company (BHC)
or savings and loan holding company (SLHC) that is subject to Category I, II, or III standards. A
covered foreign entity is a foreign banking organization (FBO) that is subject to Category II or
III standards or that has total global consolidated assets of $250 billion or more, and any U.S.
intermediate holding company (IHC) that is subject to Category II or III standards. In addition to
the FR 2590 report, the FR 2590 information collection incorporates notice requirements
pertaining to requests that may be made by a covered company or covered foreign entity to
request temporary relief from specific requirements of the SCCL rule. A respondent must retain
one exact copy of each completed FR 2590 report in electronic form and these records must be
kept for at least three years.
The estimated total annual burden for FR 2590, including one-time implementation costs,
is 171,780 hours. The proposed reporting form and instructions are available on the Board’s
public website at https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx.
Background and Justification
As demonstrated during the 2007-2008 financial crisis, large credit exposures,
particularly between financial institutions, can spread financial distress and undermine financial
stability. Section 165(e) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(Dodd-Frank Act)3 directed the Board to prescribe regulations that prohibit covered companies
and covered foreign entities from having a credit exposure to any unaffiliated company that
exceeds 25 percent of the capital stock and surplus of the covered company or covered foreign
entity, or such lower limit as the Board may determine by regulation to be necessary to mitigate
risks to the financial stability of the United States. In order to implement section 165(e) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, the Board issued the SCCL rule in the third quarter of 2018.

1

83 FR 38460 (August 6, 2018).
See 12 CFR 252, subparts H and Q.
3
See 12 U.S.C. § 5365(e).
2

The Board’s SCCL rule applies a single-counterparty credit limit to covered companies
and covered foreign entities, generally using a base of tier 1 capital, and applies an additional
single-counterparty credit limit for exposures between major counterparties.4 The SCCL rule
requires each covered company and covered foreign entity to calculate its aggregate net credit
exposure to a counterparty using the methods set forth in the rule, and sets limits on the
aggregate net credit exposure that each covered company and covered foreign entity may have to
the counterparty. In addition, certain provisions in the SCCL rule permit a covered company or
covered foreign entity to request temporary relief from specific requirements of the rule.
The FR 2590 report will collect information necessary to allow the Board to monitor
respondents’ compliance with the SCCL rule. Additionally, aside from the FR 2590 report, the
FR 2590 information collection incorporates certain notices required by the SCCL rule. This
information is not available from other sources.
Description of Information Collection
Reporting Requirements
FR 2590 Report
The FR 2590 report is designed comprehensively to capture the credit exposures of a
respondent organization to its counterparties in accordance with the SCCL rule. The rule
prohibits any covered company from having an aggregate net credit exposure to an unaffiliated
counterparty in excess of 25 percent of its tier 1 capital and prohibits a U.S. global systemically
important bank holding company (G-SIB) from having aggregate net credit exposures to any
major counterparty in excess of 15 percent of its tier 1 capital. The SCCL rule applies similar
single-counterparty credit limits to FBOs subject to Category II or III standards or that have total
consolidated assets of $250 billion or more. However, the SCCL rule allows an FBO to comply
with the rule by certifying to the Board that it meets, on a consolidated basis, a singlecounterparty credit limit established by its home country supervisor that is consistent with the
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s large exposure standard (BCBS Large Exposure
Standard). The SCCL rule also applies single-counterparty credit limits to U.S. IHCs of FBOs
that are subject to Category II or III standards, based on the IHC’s tier 1 capital.5
The FR 2590 report requests general information about the respondent organization (e.g.,
the respondent organization’s amount of its capital stock and surplus, whether the respondent is
considered a major covered company or major covered foreign entity under the rule). The form
also asks any respondent that is an FBO whether that FBO is certifying to the Board that it meets
large exposure standards on a consolidated basis established by its home country supervisor that
Under the SCCL rule, a “major counterparty” is defined as a covered company that is a U.S. G-SIB, certain large
FBOs, and any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board (12 CFR 252.71(x), 252.171(y)).
5
However, until January 1, 2021, a U.S. IHC that is subject to Category II or III standards and has less than
$250 billion in total consolidated assets is prohibited from having an aggregate net credit exposure that exceeds
25 percent of the consolidated capital stock and surplus of the U.S. IHC, rather than 25 percent of the U.S. IHC’s
tier 1 capital. After January 1, 2021, those U.S. IHCs will be prohibited from having an aggregate net credit
exposure that exceeds 25 percent of the U.S. IHC’s tier 1 capital, similar to covered companies and other covered
foreign entities.
4

2

are consistent with the BCBS Large Exposure Standard. The form requires identification of
counterparties by name and by entity type (e.g., sovereign, securitization). The form then
requests data required to calculate the respondent organization’s credit exposures, which are
reported on nine schedules. Five of these schedules (Schedules G-1 through G-5) collect
information related to the gross exposures of the respondent organization to various
counterparties. A respondent organization must add the exposure amounts in the five G
schedules to calculate its aggregate gross credit exposure. A respondent organization would then
calculate its net credit exposure by adjusting its gross credit exposures using Schedules M-1 and
M-2, which collect information related to eligible collateral and other eligible credit risk
mitigants (e.g., eligible guarantees), respectively. The respondent organization must take into
account special provisions in the SCCL rule that require aggregation of certain connected
counterparties due to economic interdependence—meaning the underlying risk of one
counterparty’s financial distress or failure would cause the financial distress or failure of another
counterparty, as indicated by the presence of certain enumerated factors in the SCCL rule—or
due to the presence of certain control relationships described in the rule.6 Data relevant to
understanding the presence of any relationships that require such aggregation are reported in
Schedules A-1 and A-2. In filling out the schedules described above, the respondent organization
must report exposures by counterparty, with a single counterparty in each row. The form requires
each respondent organization to report its top 50 counterparties.
Schedule G-1: General Exposures. This schedule contains seven general gross credit
exposure categories that are described in sections 252.73, 252.75, 252.173, and 252.175 of the
SCCL rule: (1) deposits, (2) loans and leases, (3) debt securities or investments, (4) equity
securities or investments, (5) committed credit lines, (6) guarantees and letters of credit, and
(7) securitization arising from the look-through approach.7 These gross exposures are summed
together, by counterparty, in the final column of Schedule G-1.
Schedule G-2: Repurchase Agreement Exposures. This schedule collects gross credit
exposures arising from repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements as provided in
sections 252.73 and 252.173 of the SCCL rule. It requires the respondent organization to identify
the assets transferred and received in the transaction. Examples include sovereign debt, nonsovereign debt, main index equities, and cash. The penultimate column asks for the total gross
credit exposure under bilateral netting agreements. The final column tallies the total gross credit
exposure resulting from these transactions by counterparty.
Schedule G-3: Securities Lending Exposures. This schedule collects similar information
to that collected in Schedule G-2 with respect to securities lending and securities borrowing
transactions. Again, the final column tallies the total gross credit exposure resulting from these
transactions by counterparty.
6

The requirement to aggregate counterparties based on these relationships can be found in sections 252.76 and
252.176 of the Board’s Regulation YY.
7
Calculation of gross credit exposure as a result of item (vii) (securitization arising from the look-through approach)
is described in sections 252.75 and 252.175 of Regulation YY. Gross credit exposure to a securitization that does not
require application of the look-through approach would be reported as either item (iii) (debt securities or
investments) or item (iv) (equity securities or investments), as applicable.

3

Schedule G-4: Derivatives Exposures. Schedule G-4 requires the respondent organization
to report the gross notional value of its derivatives transactions by counterparty, consistent with
sections 252.73 and 252.173 of the SCCL rule. If the respondent organization has been
authorized by the Board to use internal-models-based methodologies, then it can report its
exposures using the “Internal Model Method” columns.8 Another column in Schedule G-4 is
available for a respondent organization to report gross credit exposures resulting from qualifying
master netting agreements.9 All respondent organizations are required to complete the total gross
credit exposure column.
Schedule G-5: Risk Shifting Exposures. Schedule G-5 collects information related to
gross credit exposures that have been affected by the risk shifting requirements of sections
252.74 and 252.174 of the SCCL rule. Risk shifting is required when a respondent organization
employs six types of credit risk mitigants: (1) eligible collateral, (2) eligible guarantees,
(3) eligible credit and equity derivatives, (4) other eligible hedges, (5) unused portion of certain
extensions of credit, and (6) credit transactions involving excluded and exempt entities. Risk
shifting also may be required in connection with credit transactions involving excluded and
exempt entities. The final column aggregates the total gross exposure, by counterparty, due to
risk shifting.
Schedule M-1: Eligible Collateral. Sections 252.74 and 252.174 of the SCCL rule permit
a respondent organization to subtract the value of any eligible collateral provided by a
counterparty in connection with a particular transaction from its gross credit exposure for that
transaction. The value of all such eligible collateral is reported in Schedule M-1. Eligible
collateral includes, but is not limited to, sovereign debt, non-sovereign debt, main index equities,
other publicly traded equities, and cash. The final column sums the total credit risk mitigation
impact due to eligible collateral, by counterparty.
Schedule M-2: General Risk Mitigants. Schedule M-2 collects information related to
credit risk mitigation techniques other than the receipt of collateral used by the firm to reduce its
gross credit exposure in a given transaction. Permitted credit risk mitigation methods, described
in sections 252.74 and 252.174 of the SCCL rule, are (1) eligible guarantees, (2) eligible credit
and equity derivatives, (3) other eligible hedges, (4) unused portion of certain extensions of
credit, and (5) credit transactions involving excluded and exempt entities. The final column sums
the total credit risk mitigation effected by use of these techniques, by counterparty.
Summary of Net Credit Exposures. The reporting form contains a summary sheet that
sums the respondent organization’s aggregate gross credit exposure (as reported in the final
columns of each of the five G schedules); calculates the respondent organization’s aggregate net
credit exposures by reducing its aggregate gross credit exposure by its aggregate credit risk
mitigants (calculated by taking the sum of the final columns of the two M schedules); and
divides the respondent organization’s aggregate net credit exposure by its eligible capital base.10
8

If the respondent organization has not been authorized by the Board to use internal-models-based methodologies,
the organization should leave these columns blank.
9
“Qualifying master netting agreement” is defined in sections 252.71(cc) and 252.171(ee) of Regulation YY.
10
As noted above, a respondent organization’s aggregate net credit exposure limits under the SCCL rule are based

4

The resulting ratio shows whether the respondent organization’s aggregate net credit exposures
comply with the limits of the SCCL rule.
Schedule A-1: Economic Interdependence. Sections 252.76(b) and 252.176(b) of the
SCCL rule require a covered company or covered foreign entity to aggregate its net credit
exposures to counterparties that are economically interdependent—meaning that the underlying
risk of one counterparty’s financial distress or failure would cause the financial distress or failure
of another counterparty—if its aggregate net credit exposure to a counterparty exceeds 5 percent
of its tier 1 capital.11 Those sections enumerate specific factors that those covered companies or
covered foreign entities must consider in order to assess whether counterparties are economically
interdependent. Such factors include whether 50 percent or more of one counterparty’s gross
revenue is derived from the other counterparty, or whether two or more counterparties rely on the
same source for the majority of their funding.12 The SCCL rule requires that counterparties that
must be aggregated be treated as a single counterparty (reported in Schedule A-1 as an
“interconnected counterparty group”) for purposes of the aggregate net credit exposure limits of
the rule. Schedule A-1 requires the respondent organization to provide its aggregate net credit
exposure to each member of the interconnected counterparty group (one per column). The final
column of Schedule A-1 sums the total net credit exposure of the respondent organization to
each connected counterparty group.
Schedule A-2: Control Relationships. Sections 252.76(c) and 252.176(c) of the SCCL
rule require a covered company or covered foreign entity to aggregate exposures to
counterparties due to the presence of certain control relationships.13 These sections require that
counterparties that are connected by certain specified control relationships be treated as a single
counterparty (reported in Schedule A-2 as a “control counterparty group”) for purposes of the
aggregate net credit exposure limits of the SCCL rule. Schedule A-2 requires the respondent
organization to provide its aggregate net credit exposure to each member of the interconnected
counterparty group (one per column). The final column of Schedule A-2 sums the total net credit
exposure of the respondent organization to each control counterparty group.

on a percentage of either its capital stock and surplus or its tier 1 capital. “Eligible capital base,” as reported on this
form, refers to either the respondent organization’s capital stock and surplus or its tier 1 capital, as applicable.
11
Until January 1, 2021, a U.S. IHC that is subject to Category II or III standards and has less than $250 billion in
total consolidated assets does not have to conduct an assessment for economic interdependence; however, after
January 1, 2021, such a U.S. IHC will be required to conduct an assessment for economic interdependence in the
same manner as all covered companies and other covered foreign entities. See section 252.176(a) of the SCCL rule.
12
A covered company or covered foreign entity is required to conduct an assessment for economic interdependence
only if its aggregate net credit exposure to a counterparty exceeds 5 percent of its tier 1 capital. See sections
252.76(b) and 252.176(b) of the SCCL rule. If none of the enumerated factors is met, then the covered company or
covered foreign entity need not aggregate exposures to those counterparties unless the Board determines that one or
more other counterparties of the covered company or covered foreign entity are economically interdependent. Id.
13
Until January 1, 2021, a U.S. IHC that is subject to Category II or III standards and has less than $250 billion in
total consolidated assets does not have to conduct an assessment for certain control relationships; however, after
January 1, 2021, such a U.S. IHC will be required to conduct an assessment for certain control relationships in the
same manner as all covered companies and other covered foreign entities. See section 252.176(a) of the SCCL rule.

5

Notice Requirements in the SCCL Rule
Certain provisions in the SCCL rule permit a covered company or covered foreign entity
to request temporary relief from specific requirements of the rule. Specifically, the SCCL rule
permits a covered company or covered foreign entity to request temporary relief from
requirements to aggregate one or more counterparties even if one or more factors indicating
economic interdependence or control relationships are met, subject to certain conditions,
including that such relief be in the public interest and consistent with the purpose of the rule.14
The SCCL rule also permits a covered company or covered foreign entity that is not in
compliance with the requirements of the rule to request a special temporary credit exposure limit
exemption from the Board to permit continued credit transactions with that counterparty, based
upon a finding that those transactions are necessary or appropriate to preserve the safety and
soundness of the covered company or U.S. financial stability.15 These notices must be submitted
to the Board and are not part of the FR 2590 report.
Recordkeeping Requirements
The instructions for the FR 2590 report state that a respondent must retain one exact copy
of each completed report in electronic form. These records must be kept for at least three years.
Respondent Panel
The FR 2590 respondent panel comprises U.S. BHCs and SLHCs that are subject to
Category I, II, or III standards, FBOs that are subject to Category II or III standards or that have
total global consolidated assets of $250 billion or more, and U.S. IHCs that are subject to
Category II or III standards.
Time Schedule for Information Collection
U.S. and foreign G-SIBs are required to comply with the SCCL rule by January 1, 2020,
and all other covered companies and covered foreign entities are required to comply by July 1,
2020.16 As a result, the first data collection of the FR 2590 report will occur as of the end of the
first quarter of 2020 for respondents that are U.S. and foreign G-SIBs, and as of the end of the
third quarter of 2020 for all other respondents. After the initial compliance date, respondent
organizations will be required to file this form on a quarterly basis, consistent with the SCCL
rule’s compliance requirements.17 Respondents will file the FR 2590 report quarterly, as of the
close of business March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. Submission will be due
40 calendar days after March 31, June 30, and September 30, and 45 calendar days after
December 31.

14

See sections 252.76(b)(3), 252.76(c)(2), 252.176(b)(3), and 252.176(c)(2) of the SCCL rule.
See sections 252.78(c)(2) and 252.178(c)(2) of the SCCL rule.
16
Note that the Board has proposed separately to amend the SCCL rule to extend the initial compliance dates for
FBOs to comply with the SCCL applicable to their U.S. operations. 84 FR 64031 (November 20, 2019).
17
A respondent organization would report compliance on a quarterly basis, unless the Board determines and notifies
the covered company or covered foreign entity in writing that more frequent compliance is required. See sections
252.78(a)(2) and 252.178(a)(3) of the SCCL rule.
15

6

Notices associated with requests for temporary relief from specific requirements of the
SCCL rule must be provided to the Board when a firm seeks such a request.
Public Availability of Data
There is no data related to this information collection available to the public.
Legal Status
The FR 2590 is authorized pursuant to section 5(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956 (BHC Act) (12 U.S.C. § 1844(c)) for BHCs and section 10(b) of the Home Owners’ Loan
Act (12 U.S.C. § 1467a(b)) for SLHCs. With respect to FBOs and their subsidiary IHCs, the
FR 2590 is authorized pursuant to section 5(c) of the BHC Act, in conjunction with section 8 of
the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. § 3106). The FR 2590 is mandatory.
The data collected on the FR 2590 report will be kept confidential under exemption 4 of
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which protects from disclosure trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)), and exemption 8 of FOIA, which
protects from disclosure information related to the supervision or examination of a regulated
financial institution (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(8)).
Regarding notices associated with requests for temporary relief from specific
requirements of the SCCL rule, a firm may request confidential treatment under the Board’s
rules regarding confidential treatment of information at 12 CFR 261.15. The Board will consider
whether such information may be kept confidential in accordance with exemption 4 of FOIA
(5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4)) or any other applicable FOIA exemption.
Consultation Outside the Agency
There has been no consultation outside the Federal Reserve System.
Public Comments
On August 6, 2018, the Board published an initial notice in the Federal Register
(83 FR 38303) requesting public comment for 60 days on the implementation of FR 2590. The
comment period for this notice expired on October 5, 2018. The Board received two comment
letters in response to the proposal to implement FR 2590. Commenters generally requested that
the required number of reported counterparties be lowered to only the top 20 counterparties plus
certain other counterparties to whom exposure is more than 10 percent of the firm’s tier 1 capital
or capital stock and surplus, as applicable, and that proposed data fields beyond those required to
monitor compliance with the SCCL rule (including those seeking data on exposures to
counterparties that are excluded or exempt under the SCCL rule) be removed. The Board
continues to believe it is appropriate to require reporting a firm’s top 50 counterparties, as that
would provide the Board with greater ability to monitor a wider network of counterparty
relationships and potential channels of contagion, consistent with the SCCL rule. Further,
requiring the reporting of a firm’s top 50 counterparties will enhance a substantial supervisory

7

interest in identifying where similar risks occur in different forms across a firm’s balance sheet,
which, for instance, may influence the future design of different stress testing counterparty
default scenarios. The Board also believes it is appropriate to require reporting of excluded or
exempt counterparties in order to help ensure that firms properly calculate their exposures for
purposes of the SCCL rule. The Board notes that the BCBS Large Exposure Standard includes
certain reporting requirements related to excluded and exempt entities. Therefore, the Board has
not made any changes to the FR 2590 report in response to these comments.
Commenters also sought clarification on the process by which FBOs could comply with
the SCCL rule’s requirements with respect to their combined U.S. operations by certifying that
they meet limits established by home country supervision frameworks consistent with the BCBS
Large Exposure Standard, as well as the reporting requirements associated with such
certification. The reporting form includes a checkbox that FBOs can use to indicate that they
meet the requirements of a home country supervisory regime consistent with the BCBS Large
Exposure Standard. Further, the preamble to the SCCL rule clarifies that submission of the
FR 2590 report with this box checked generally will be sufficient to meet the reporting
requirements of the SCCL rule with respect to the single-counterparty credit limits that apply to
an FBO’s combined U.S. operations. However, in accordance with the SCCL rule, an FBO may
be required to provide additional information or reporting concerning its counterparty credit
exposures upon written request by the Board.
Commenters further requested that the Board permit the executive officer responsible for
oversight of compliance or for preparation of the reporting form, rather than the Chief Financial
Officer, to sign the FR 2590 report and that firms be permitted to maintain an electronic rather
than a hard copy of the form for their records. In addition, commenters requested certain
technical corrections and clarifications to the form’s fields (e.g., headers, titles) and instructions.
In response to these comments, the FR 2590 report permits the executive officer responsible for
SCCL rule compliance or the Chief Financial Officer (or an individual performing this
equivalent function) to sign the form certifying compliance, electronic submission of the form,
and the maintenance of electronic, rather than hard copy, forms.
In addition to comments on the proposed form, commenters also requested changes to the
SCCL rule. One commenter requested that the Board delay implementation of the SCCL rule
until the Board finalizes its proposals to tailor enhanced prudential standards applicable to U.S.
BHCs, savings and loan holding companies, and FBOs with operations in the United States.
Commenters further requested that the Board permit the U.S. IHCs of FBOs to value certain
credit exposures for purposes of the SCCL rule using models approved by the FBOs’ home
country supervisors. The Board has determined that these comments, which relate to the content
of the SCCL rule itself, are outside of the scope of the Board’s Paperwork Reduction Act review
of the FR 2590.18 The Board notes that it finalized its rule to tailor enhanced prudential standards
to those entities on October 10, 2019.19 Commenters also requested that the Board permit an
FBO to comply with the SCCL rule, with respect to its combined U.S. operations, through
certification concerning its home country supervision framework prior to effectiveness of the
18

A similar comment concerning the use of models approved by foreign supervisors was received and discussed in
connection with the Board’s finalization of the SCCL rule. 83 FR 38460, 38490 (August 6, 2018).
19
84 FR 59032 (November 1, 2019).

8

home country supervision framework, so long as the home country supervisor is working
towards a framework consistent with the BCBS Large Exposure Standard or, in the alternative,
to extend the initial compliance dates for FBOs to comply with the SCCL applicable to their U.S.
operations. The Board has proposed separately to amend the SCCL rule to extend the initial
compliance dates for FBOs to comply with the SCCL applicable to their U.S. operations.20
Therefore, no changes to the FR 2590 report have been made in response to this comment. On
November 20, 2019, the Board published a final notice on the implementation of the FR 2590 in
the Federal Register (84 FR 64070).
Estimate of Respondent Burden
As shown in the table below, the estimated total annual burden for FR 2590, including
one-time implementation costs, is 171,780 hours. The ongoing estimated average hours per
response is 254 hours per quarterly submission and one-time implementation estimated average
hours per respondent is 1,273 hours. With regard to the notice requirements pertaining to
requests for temporary relief from specific requirements of the SCCL rule, only firms that seek
such requests would need to file any documentation. The estimated average hours per response
for temporary relief is 10 hours. Additionally, the estimated average time per response for the
recordkeeping requirement per quarterly submission is 15 minutes. These reporting and
recordkeeping requirements represent 1.5 percent of the Board’s total paperwork burden.
Estimated
number of
respondents21

FR 2590

Estimated
Annual
average hours
frequency
per response

Reporting
One-time implementation
Ongoing
Requests for temporary relief

75
75
3

1
4
1

Recordkeeping

75

4

Estimated
annual burden
hours

1,273
254
10
0.25

95,475
76,200
30
75
171,780

Total
The estimated total annual cost to the public for this collection of information is
$9,894,528.22

20

84 FR 64031 (November 20, 2019).
Of these respondents, none are considered small entities as defined by the Small Business Administration (i.e.,
entities with less than $600 million in total assets), https://www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards.
22
Total cost to the public was estimated using the following formula: percent of staff time, multiplied by annual
burden hours, multiplied by hourly rates (30% Office & Administrative Support at $19, 45% Financial Managers at
$71, 15% Lawyers at $69, and 10% Chief Executives at $96). Hourly rates for each occupational group are the
(rounded) mean hourly wages from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS), Occupational Employment and Wages
May 2018, published March 29, 2019, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.t01.htm. Occupations are defined
using the BLS Occupational Classification System, https://www.bls.gov/soc/.
21

9

Sensitive Questions
This collection of information contains no questions of a sensitive nature, as defined by
OMB guidelines.
Estimate of Cost to the Federal Reserve System
The estimated cost to the Federal Reserve System for collecting and processing this
information collection is $204,800.

10