OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
03/31/2022
106
0
106
16,100
0
16,100
57,600
0
57,600
The National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Surface Coating of Metal Coil
were proposed on July 18, 2000, promulgated on June 10, 2002, and
most recently amended on March 17, 2003. The NESHAP is codified at
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSS. This supporting statement addresses
information collection activities that will be imposed by the
NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Coils, including activities
proposed to be added based on the residual risk and technology
review (RTR) required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The NESHAP for
Surface Coating of Metal Coils applies to each new and existing
affected source of HAP emissions at facilities that are major
sources and that perform metal coil surface coating. New facilities
include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after
July 18, 2000. As part of the RTR for the NESHAP for Surface
Coating of Metal Coils, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is not proposing to revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA
is proposing to require periodic air emissions testing to measure
organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency at the inlet and
outlet of the add-on control device, or control device outlet
concentration of organic HAP, once every five years for existing
and new surface coating affected sources using the emission rate
with add-on controls compliance option. The EPA is proposing to
revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) provisions of
the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule and proposing
the use of electronic data reporting for future performance test
data submittals, notifications, and reports. This information is
being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
SSSS. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial
notifications, performance tests (if sources are using add-on
controls to demonstrate compliance), and periodic reports by the
owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required
to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any deviation
from an emission limitation (either a numerical emission limit, an
operating limit, or an equipment or work practice standard), or any
period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining
compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to
the NESHAP.
The increase in burden results
from the RTR for the NESHAP for Surface Coating of Metal Coils. EPA
is proposing to require periodic air emissions testing to measure
organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency at the inlet and
outlet of the add-on control device, or control device outlet
concentration of organic HAP, once every five years for existing
and new surface coating affected sources using the emission rate
with add-on controls compliance option. The EPA is proposing to
revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) provisions of
the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule and proposing
the use of electronic data reporting for future performance test
data submittals, notifications, and reports.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.