FRCC_20191206_omb

FRCC_20191206_omb.pdf

Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation CC

OMB: 7100-0235

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Supporting Statement for the
Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation CC
(FR CC; OMB No. 7100-0235)
Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC)
(Docket No. R-1637; RIN 7100-AF28)
Summary
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), under authority
delegated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has extended for three years, with
revision, the Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation CC (FR CC; OMB No.
7100-0235) which implements the Expedited Funds Availability Act of 1987 (EFA Act)1 and the
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003 (Check 21 Act)2. Regulation CC - Availability
of Funds and Collection of Checks (12 CFR 229) requires banks3 to make funds deposited in
transaction accounts available within specified time periods, disclose their availability policies to
customers, and begin accruing interest on such deposits promptly. The disclosures are intended
to alert customers that their ability to use deposited funds may be delayed, prevent unintentional
(and potentially costly) overdrafts, and allow customers to compare the policies of different
banks before deciding at which bank to deposit funds. Regulation CC also requires notice to the
depositary bank and to a customer of nonpayment of a check. Model disclosure forms, clauses,
and notices are appended to the regulation to ease compliance.
The Board and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) (collectively, the
agencies) adopted a final rule that amended Regulation CC to implement a statutory requirement
in the EFA Act to adjust the dollar amounts under the EFA Act for inflation. The agencies also
amended Regulation CC to incorporate the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act (EGRRCPA) amendments to the EFA Act, which include extending coverage to
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam, and making
certain other technical amendments. The agencies added section 229.11 to provide the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) calculation methodology,
which includes an explanation of how annual and cumulative changes (positive or negative) in
the CPI-W will be taken into account, for the dollar amounts in section 229.10(c)(1)(vii)
regarding the minimum amount, section 229.12(d) for the cash withdrawal amount, section
229.13(a) for the new-account amount, section 229.13(b) for the large-deposit threshold, section
229.13(d) for repeatedly overdrawn threshold, and section 229.21(a) for the civil liability
amounts. The revisions are effective July 1, 2020. Although Regulation CC applies to all banks,
the Board accounts for only the burden imposed on the 940 state member banks and uninsured
state branches and agencies of foreign banks that it supervises. The current estimated total annual
burden for the FR CC is 176,114 hours, and would increase to 187,394 hours. The adopted
revisions would result in an increase of 11,280 hours.

1

See 12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.
See 12 U.S.C. 5001 et seq.
3
For purposes of Regulation CC, banks are commercial banks, savings associations, credit unions, and U.S.
branches and agencies of foreign banks.
2

Background and Justification
The EFA Act requires banks to provide customers and potential customers specific
written notices and disclosures on the occurrence of specific events, such as opening an account,
delaying availability of the proceeds of a deposited check beyond the usual availability date,
changing the bank’s funds availability policies, or in response to a customer’s request. The
Check 21 Act requires banks to provide a consumer awareness disclosure regarding substitute
checks in certain circumstances.4 In addition, if a consumer uses the special procedure that the
Check 21 Act provides to resolve errors associated with substitute checks, the Check 21 Act
requires the consumer’s bank to provide a notice to the consumer regarding disposition of the
consumer’s claim. All of the notice and disclosure requirements of Regulation CC, which are
discussed in more detail below, are found expressly in the EFA Act or the Check 21 Act, except
for the notice of a delay under a case-by-case hold policy and the notice of a returned check.
As required by the EFA Act, the Board has published model disclosure forms and clauses
to facilitate compliance with the disclosure requirements of that law. The EFA Act specifically
provides that banks are not required to use these model forms and clauses. However, a bank that
uses one of the model forms appropriately is deemed to be in compliance with the EFA Act
disclosure requirements. As required by the Check 21 Act, the Board published a model
disclosure that a bank may, at its option, use as a safe harbor to satisfy the general consumer
awareness disclosure requirements of that law. The Board also published model notices that
banks may use to satisfy their notice obligations regarding substitute check error resolution
claims, but neither the Check 21 Act nor Regulation CC provide a safe harbor for using these
notices.
Description of Information Collection
Specific availability policy disclosure (Section 229.16) and Initial disclosures
(Section 229.17)
Before accepting a deposit to open a new transaction account, banks must provide written
disclosures stating when deposited funds generally will be available for withdrawal, referred to
as a specific availability-policy disclosure. The disclosure must reflect the availability policy
followed by the bank in most cases, that is, as to most transaction accounts and most deposits
into those accounts. The disclosure must include, to the extent applicable, a description of:
 the categories of deposits or checks the bank uses when it delays availability, how to
determine into which category a check or deposit falls, and when each category of check
or deposit is available for withdrawal,
 any of the exceptions permitted by Regulation CC to the availability requirements of the
regulation that may be invoked by the bank,

4

To facilitate check truncation and electronic check exchange, the Check 21 Act authorizes a new negotiable
instrument called a substitute check and provides that a properly prepared substitute check is the legal equivalent of
the original check for all purposes. A substitute check is a paper reproduction of the original check that can be
processed just like the original check. The Check 21 Act does not require any bank to create substitute checks or to
accept checks electronically.

2




any case-by-case policy of delaying availability longer than the time periods stated in the
specific availability policy, if the specific availability policy makes funds available for
withdrawal sooner than required by Regulation CC, and
a description of how to differentiate between proprietary and nonproprietary automatic
teller machines (ATMs) if the bank’s availability policy differs between the two.

When a bank receives a written request by mail to open an account and the request
includes a deposit, the bank may open the account, but must mail the disclosures no later than the
next business day following the banking day on which the deposit was received. When a
telephone request is made to open an account and includes a request to transfer funds from
another account to make the initial deposit, the initial disclosures must be mailed no later than
the next business day following the banking day on which the request was made.
Disclosure of specific availability policy to any person upon request (Sections 229.16
and 229.18(d))
Section 229.18(d) provides that a bank must provide the specific availability-policy
disclosure described in section 229.16, to any person who makes an oral or written request
regarding the policy.
Longer delays on a case-by-case basis: Notice in specific policy disclosure (Section
229.16(c))
If a bank has a policy of generally making funds available for withdrawal sooner than
required under Regulation CC, but delaying availability on a case-by-case basis, the customer
must receive not only advance notice of the policy (as described above), but also notice each
time a delay is imposed. The notice must include the date of deposit, the amount being delayed,
and the date funds will be available for withdrawal. If the notice is not provided at the time of
deposit, it must be mailed or delivered no later than the first business day following the banking
day of the deposit.
Notice of exceptions (Section 229.13(g))
Regulation CC permits banks to invoke certain exceptions to the availability schedules
required by the regulation. Whenever a bank invokes such an exception, it must notify the
customer in writing (special rules apply to exceptions pertaining to large dollar deposits and
redeposited checks into nonconsumer accounts, as well as an exception pertaining to repeated
overdrafts). The notice must include the date of deposit, the amount being delayed, the reason the
exception was invoked, and when funds will be available for withdrawal. If the notice is not
provided at the time of deposit, it must be mailed or delivered by the later of: the first business
day following the banking day of the deposit, or the first business day following the day the bank
becomes aware of the facts upon which the exception hold is based.

3

Notice on preprinted deposit slips (Section 229.18(a))
The preprinted deposit slip notice must inform the customer, on the face of the deposit
slip, that deposits may not be available for immediate withdrawal. This notice is a standardized,
machine-generated form and does not change from one individual account to another; thus, the
burden for this requirement is negligible.
Locations where employees accept consumer deposits (Section 229.18(b)) and
Automated teller machines (ATMs) (Section 229.18(c))
A bank must post conspicuously in each location where consumers may make deposits a
notice of its funds availability policy for consumer accounts. The notice must be posted so that
consumers are likely to see it prior to making a deposit. A bank must also ensure that a notice is
posted at all ATMs accepting deposits for the bank that ATM deposits may not be available for
immediate withdrawal. Such notice may be posted on a sign, on the screen of the ATM, or
included on the deposit envelopes provided at the ATM.
Notice of changes in policy (Section 229.18(e))
A bank is required to send consumer account holders notice of changes in its availability
policy at least thirty days before the change becomes effective. However, where a change in
policy results in faster availability, the notice may be sent no later than thirty days after the
change.
If a bank provides its customers with a list of ATMs in its availability policy (to fulfill the
requirement that it explain its availability policy for proprietary and nonproprietary ATMs), it
must update the list annually if any changes occurred during the year.
Notices of nonpayment (Section 229.33(a) and (d))
Notification to banks - If a bank on which a check is drawn in an amount of $2,500 or
more determines not to pay the check, the bank must notify the depositary bank by 4:00 p.m. on
the second business day after the day of presentment.
Notification to customer - If the depositary bank receives a returned check or notice of
nonpayment, regardless of the amount, it must send notice to its customer generally by midnight
of the banking day following the banking day on which it received the returned check or notice
(a longer time than may be deemed reasonable in some cases). This requirement is considered
not to cause the bank additional burden because, were the requirement not to exist, banks
presumably would nonetheless provide a similar notification to customers in the usual and
customary course of their business.
Expedited recredit for consumers (Sections 229.54(a) and (b)(2))
This section of the rule provides that a consumer may make an expedited recredit claim
with respect to a substitute check if the consumer asserts in good faith that (1) the bank holding

4

the consumer’s account charged that account for a substitute check that was provided to the
consumer (although the consumer need not be in possession of the substitute check at the time he
or she submits a claim), (2) the substitute check was not properly charged to the consumer
account or the consumer has a “warranty claim”5 with respect to the substitute check, (3) the
consumer suffered a resulting loss, and (4) production of the original check or a sufficient copy
of the original check is necessary to determine whether or not the substitute check in fact was
improperly charged or whether the consumer’s warranty claim is valid.
The consumer’s claim must include certain information described in the Check 21 Act
and section 229.54 of Regulation CC.
Notices relating to consumer expedited recredit claims (validation, denial or
reversal) (Section 229.54(e))
This notice is required when a bank validates, denies, or reverses a consumer’s recredit
claim. Although the statute does not explicitly discuss providing a notice when a bank validates a
claim, the bank’s ability to respond to a claim by determining that the claim is valid is implicit in
the “timing of the recredit” section of the statute (section 7(c)(2)(A)), which requires the bank to
provide a recredit the day after it determines that the consumer’s claim is valid.
If a bank determines that the consumer’s claim is invalid, the bank must provide the
consumer with the original check or a copy of the original check sufficient to determine the
validity of the claim and must demonstrate why the substitute check was properly charged to the
consumer account. The bank must either demonstrate that a charge was proper or explain why
the warranty claim is not valid, as appropriate in light of the consumer’s claim.
Expedited recredit claim for banks (Section 229.55)
This section of the EFA Act provides that a bank may make a claim against an
indemnifying bank if (1) the claimant bank or a bank that the claimant bank has indemnified has
received a claim for expedited recredit from a consumer or would have been subject to such a
claim if the consumer account had been charged for the substitute check, (2) the claimant bank is
obligated to provide a consumer expedited recredit with respect to such substitute check or
otherwise has suffered a resulting loss, and (3) the production of the original check or a sufficient
copy of the original check is necessary to determine the validity of the charge to the consumer
account or the validity of any warranty claim connected with such substitute check.
The content requirements for an interbank expedited recredit claim essentially parallel
those for a consumer expedited recredit claim but also state that a bank that provides a copy of a
substitute check with its claim must take steps to ensure that such copy is not mistaken for a
legally equivalent substitute check or handled for forward collection or return. An indemnifying
bank may require the claim to be in writing and may permit the claimant bank to submit it
5

When a bank transfers, presents, or returns a substitute check for consideration (or any paper or electronic
representation of a substitute check), the bank makes two warranties (1) that the substitute check meets the
requirements for legal equivalence and (2) that no depository bank, drawee, drawer, or indorser will be asked for
payment based on a check that it already has paid. See 69 FR 1476 published on January 8, 2004.

5

electronically. In addition, section 229.60 provides that banks involved in an interbank expedited
recredit claim under section 229.55 may vary the terms of that section by agreement, but
otherwise no person may vary the terms of subpart D by agreement.
Consumer awareness (Section 229.57)
This section of the EFA Act provides a description of the disclosure that banks must
provide to consumers to promote awareness of substitute checks. Banks are required to provide a
one-time consumer awareness disclosure at the time the customer relationship is initiated to
consumers who will routinely receive paid checks with their periodic account statements in
accordance with their deposit agreements. Banks also must provide the substitute check
consumer awareness disclosure (1) any time a consumer receives a substitute check in response
to a consumer’s request for a check or check copy or (2) any time a check that the consumer
deposited is later returned unpaid to the consumer in the form of a substitute check. Section 12(c)
of the Check 21 Act requires the Board to publish model disclosures that banks can use to satisfy
the content requirements of the consumer awareness disclosure required by that section. The
statute provides that a bank that uses the model disclosure published by the Board to comply
with section 229.57 of the EFA Act shall be treated as complying with that section if it
accurately describes the bank’s policies and practices. The model disclosure explains in very
simple terms what a substitute check is, when the consumer expedited recredit right applies, and
what a consumer must do to exercise that right.
Adopted Revisions to the FR CC
The agencies adopted a final rule that amended Regulation CC to implement a statutory
requirement in the EFA Act to adjust the dollar amounts under the EFA Act for inflation. The
agencies also amended Regulation CC to incorporate the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) amendments to the EFA Act, which include
extending coverage to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and Guam, and making certain other technical amendments. The agencies added section 229.11
to provide the CPI-W calculation methodology, which includes an explanation of how annual
and cumulative changes (positive or negative) in the CPI-W will be taken into account, for the
dollar amounts in section 229.10(c)(1)(vii) regarding the minimum amount, section 229.12(d) for
the cash withdrawal amount, section 229.13(a) for the new-account amount, section 229.13(b)
for the large-deposit threshold, section 229.13(d) for repeatedly overdrawn threshold, and section
229.21(a) for the civil liability amounts. The final rule is effective September 3, 2019, except for
the amendments to 12 CFR 229.1, 229.10, 229.11, 229.12(d), 229.21, and appendix E to part
229, which are effective July 1, 2020.
Time Schedule for Information Collection
The notice and disclosure requirements for Regulation CC are triggered by specific
events and must be provided to consumers within the time periods established by the law and
regulation. There is no reporting form associated with the requirements of Regulation CC;
disclosures or notifications, pertaining to a particular transaction or consumer account, are not

6

publicly available. Model disclosure forms, clauses, and notices are appended to the regulation to
ease compliance.
Legal Status
The EFA Act and the Check 21 Act authorize the Board to issue regulations to carry out
the provisions of those Acts (12 U.S.C. § 4008 and 12 U.S.C. § 5014, respectively). All banks
are required to comply with Regulation CC, thus the information collection is mandatory.
However, the information that Regulation CC requires of consumers who are making an
expedited recredit claim is to obtain a benefit. Because the Board does not collect any
information, no issue of confidentiality arises. However, if, during a compliance examination of
a financial institution, a violation or possible violation of the EFA Act or the Check 21 Act is
noted then information regarding such violation may be kept confidential pursuant to section
(b)(8) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(8)).
Consultation Outside the Agency
The Board consulted with the Bureau during the proposed rule and final rule.
Public Comments
On December 10, 2018, the agencies published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register (83 FR 63431) for public comment. The comment period for this notice expired
on February 8, 2019. The agencies received comments related to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) analysis. Eight commenters, including credit unions and credit union trade associations,
expressed concern regarding the burden imposed on institutions to implement the inflation
adjustments. Several credit union commenters stated that the cost burden imposed on institutions
to implement the inflation indexing could exceed the agencies’ estimate in the proposal, noting
in particular the printing and distribution costs associated with sending notices to customers of
the changes in the institutions’ funds-availability policies (commonly referred to as “change-interms” notices). One commenter specifically voiced concern about the disproportionate cost
impact on smaller credit unions for printing and mailing notices in general and, in specific, the
change-in-terms notice. To reduce that burden, the commenter also urged the agencies to reduce
the length of the required funds-availability disclosures or permit them to accompany monthly
account statements. Another commenter suggested reducing burden by establishing an exception
within the Regulation CC provision, section 229.18(e), that requires the change-in-terms notice.
Specifically, the commenter suggested that an institution not be required to provide a change-interms notice when its funds-availability policy changes due to the periodic inflation adjustments
to the Regulation CC funds-availability dollar amounts that are mandated by section 607(f) of the
EFA Act.
In the final rule, the agencies declined to establish in Regulation CC an exception to the
requirement to send a change-in-terms notice, as this requirement is established by statute.
However, the agencies note several ways that depository institutions may lower their costs under
the rule, including providing the required notice electronically and sending it with the monthly
account statement, as follows.

7

Electronic delivery is permitted where the institution has complied with the requirements
of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-Sign Act) (15 U.S.C. §
7001 et seq.). Further, the regulation already permits an institution to send a required change-interms notice on or with a monthly account statement, and this is so irrespective of whether the
institution sends the notice and statement electronically or in paper form. In addition, an
institution need not set forth the entirety of its revised funds-availability policy in its change-interms notice. If an institution chooses to provide the notice by sending a complete new
availability disclosure, the institution must direct the customer to the changed terms in the
disclosure by use of a letter or insert, or by highlighting the changed terms in the disclosure. And
finally, the agencies anticipate providing one year between the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts and the date on which the adjusted amounts become
effective. The agencies believe that this one-year timeframe provides institutions with a
sufficient interim in which to plan to send their change-in-terms notices in a way that minimizes
the burden associated with doing so. In light of all of these factors, and given that the inflation
adjustments are statutorily required and will occur only once every five years, the agencies
believe that the burden on institutions to send change-in-terms notices reflecting the inflationadjusted amounts is reasonable.
On July 3, 2019, the agencies published a final rule in the Federal Register
(84 FR 31687). The final rule is effective September 3, 2019, except for the amendments to 12
CFR 229.1, 229.10, 229.11, 229.12(d), 229.21, and appendix E to part 229, which are effective
July 1, 2020.
Estimate of Respondent Burden
As shown in the table below, the estimated total annual burden for the FR CC is 176,114
hours, and would increase to 187,394 hours with the adopted revisions. The estimated average
hours per response caused by a particular notice or disclosure requirement depends on several
factors, including whether the notice is machine-generated and whether it is customer-specific.
The notices given at account opening and upon request and the notices posted where consumers
make deposits are disclosures concerning the bank’s policy. They are machine-generated and are
not customer-specific; thus the burden per response is minimal. The notice of changes in policy
(including the annual notice updating the ATM list, if necessary) is not customer-specific, but
likely requires more time to prepare. Also, the timing for these is more uncertain because they
are event-triggered and not given a standard schedule; therefore, the burden per response is
greater than for other notices. Notices given when a bank invokes a case-by-case hold or an
exception permitted by the regulation are customer-specific; therefore the burden per response
associated with these notices is slightly greater. The notice of nonpayment is also customerspecific; however, it is machine-generated. Therefore, the burden per response associated with
this notice is less than the burden per response associated with other customer-specific notices.
For purposes of the PRA, no paperwork burden is associated with the recordkeeping requirement
of Regulation CC. Section 229.21(g) requires banks to retain evidence of compliance for no less
than two years but does not specify the kind of records that must be retained for this purpose.
These disclosure requirements represent 1.75 percent of the Board’s total paperwork burden.

8

FR CC

Estimated
number of
respondents6

Estimated
Estimated
Annual
average hours annual burden
frequency
per response
hours

Current
Bank burden
Sections 229.16 and 229.17
Specific availability policy
disclosure and initial disclosures

940

500

0.02

9,400

Section 229.16(c)
Longer delays on a case-by-case
basis - Notice in specific policy
disclosure

940

700

0.05

32,900

Section 229.13(g)
Notice of exceptions

940

2,000

0.05

94,000

Sections 229.18(b) and 229.18(c)
Locations where employees accept
consumer deposits and ATMs

940

1

0.25

235

Section 229.18(e)
Annual notice of new ATMs

940

1

5

4,700

Section 229.18(e)
Changes in policy

100

2

20

4,000

Section 229.31(c)
Notice of nonpayment on paying
bank

940

35

0.02

658

Section 229.33(h)
Notification to customer

940

370

0.02

6,956

Section 229.54(a)
Expedited recredit for consumers

940

35

0.25

8,225

Section 229.55
Expedited recredit for banks

940

15

0.25

3,525

Section 229.57
Consumer awareness

940

300

0.02

5,640

940

25

0.25

5,875
176,114

Consumer burden
Section 229.54(b)(2)
Expedited recredit claim notice
Current Total
6

Of these respondents, 551 are considered small entities as defined by the Small Business Administration (i.e.,
entities with less than $550 million in total assets), https://www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards.

9

Proposed
Bank burden
Sections 229.16 and 229.17
Specific availability policy
disclosure and initial disclosures

940

500

0.02

9,400

Section 229.16(c)
Longer delays on a case-by-case
basis - Notice in specific policy
disclosure

940

700

0.05

32,900

940

2,000

0.05

94,000

940

1

0.25

235

Section 229.11(c)
Quinquennial inflation
adjustments for disclosures
(annualized)

940

1

8

7,520

Section 229.18(e)
Annual notice of new ATMs

940

1

5

4,700

Section 229.18(e)
Changes in policy

100

2

20

4,000

940

1

4

3,760

940

35

0.02

658

Section 229.33(h)
Notification to customer

940

370

0.02

6,956

Section 229.54(a)
Expedited recredit for consumers

940

35

0.25

8,225

Section 229.55
Expedited recredit for banks

940

15

0.25

3,525

Section 229.57
Consumer awareness

940

300

0.02

5,640

Section 229.13(g)
Notice of exceptions
Sections 229.18(b) and 229.18(c)
Locations where employees accept
consumer deposits and ATMs

Section 229.18(e)
Notification of quinquennial
inflation adjustments (annualized)
Section 229.31(c)
Notice of nonpayment on paying
bank

10

Consumer burden
Section 229.54(b)(2)
Expedited recredit claim notice
Proposed Total

940

25

Change

0.25

5,875
187,394
11,280

The current estimated total annual cost to the public for the FR CC is $9,958,516 and
would increase to $10,608,244 with the adopted revisions.7
Sensitive Questions
This collection of information contains no questions of a sensitive nature, as defined by
OMB guidelines.
Estimate of Cost to the Federal Reserve System
Since the Board does not collect any information, the cost to the Federal Reserve System
is negligible.

7

For bank burden, the total cost to the public was estimated using the following formula: percent of staff time,
multiplied by annual burden hours, multiplied by hourly rates (30% Office & Administrative Support at $19, 45%
Financial Managers at $71, 15% Lawyers at $69, and 10% Chief Executives at $96). Hourly rates for each
occupational group are the (rounded) mean hourly wages from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS),
Occupational Employment and Wages May 2018, published March 29, 2019,
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.t01.htm. Occupations are defined using the BLS Standard Occupational
Classification System, https://www.bls.gov/soc/.
For consumer burden, the average consumer cost of $26 is estimated using data from the BLS Economic News
Release (USDL-19-0307) https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cewqtr_02202019.htm.

11


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2019-12-06
File Created2019-12-06

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy