The Shipping Act of 1984 (Shipping Act
or Act), 46 U.S.C. 40101 et seq., establishes an alternative
antitrust regime that grants limited antitrust immunity to
regulated entities and requires that they file their commercial
agreements with the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC or
Commission). Section 40301 identifies which agreements between
ocean common carriers and/or marine terminal operators (MTOs) fall
within the jurisdiction of the Act. Section 40302 requires that
carriers and MTOs file those agreements with the Commission.
Section 40304 provides the authority for Commission action on filed
agreements, including the authority to require information from
parties to an agreement. Section 40104 provides the authority for
the Commission to require periodic or special reports from carriers
and other related persons. These requests for additional
information and the filing of reports assist the Commission in its
statutory responsibility to analyze the activities of parties to
agreements. Such information aids the Commission in monitoring the
activities of agreement parties to determine whether any Commission
action is required in response to adverse market conditions
resulting from the agreement.
The net increase in burden
hours for respondents from the current reported burden of 13,629
hours to 15,655 hours, as reflected in Item 12 above, is accounted
for by a number of factors. However, those factors can generally be
summarized in that, the nature of agreements received since the
previous Paperwork Reduction Act submission has significantly
increased in complexity. These increasingly complicated agreements
with a wider range of potentially anti-competitive outcomes require
a greater level of initial burden (given that more extensive review
is required for unique agreements) and more detailed oversight
through special monitoring requirements. Regarding the government
burden, any increased government burden was mitigated due to a
Commission automation initiative. More specifically, in FY 2017,
the Commission launched the eAgreements system which provided for
the electronic filing of agreements in lieu of paper filings,
streamlined the Commission’s internal review of agreements, and
automated the manual online publication process for filed
agreements. These efforts reduced staff resources needed to
process, review, publish and manage the Commission’s filed
agreements. While electronic filing is optional, external users
were quick to adopt it. Currently, over 99 percent of agreements
are filed electronically through the eAgreements system. Thus,
automation has resulted in less resources being devoted to internal
business processes, thereby allowing staff to focus efforts on
analysis of the impact of filed agreements.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.