Appendix A - Response to 60-day public comment

CMS-484-10126 - Appendix A - Response to Public Comments.pdf

Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors (MAC) Regional Carrier, Certificate of Medical Necessity and Supporting Documentation

Appendix A - Response to 60-day public comment

OMB: 0938-0679

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Appendix A
CMS Responses to Public Comments Received (60-day FR Notice)

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) received 2 comments in
response to the publication of proposed collection and comment request for the extension
without change of a currently approved collection for CMS Form Numbers: CMS–484,
846, 847, 848, 849, 854, 10125, 10126 (OMB control number:0938–0679).
One comment was received from a national organization representing durable medical
equipment, respiratory therapy, infusion therapy, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies
(DMEPOS) suppliers, manufacturers, and other stakeholders in the homecare. One
comment was submitted by a representative of a company that develops and markets
orthopedic medical products.
A brief description of each comment is below, followed by the CMS response.

Comment:
A national organization representing durable medical equipment, respiratory therapy,
infusion therapy, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) suppliers,
manufacturers, and other stakeholders in the homecare requests CMS eliminate all
certificates of medical necessity (CMNs) and DME information forms (DIFs) as they are
currently considered claims processing tools. They explained that CMS should alter
claims processing requirements to eliminate them as they have done in the past with
CMNs for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and hospital beds. The
commenter stated that if CMNs cannot be completely removed, using electronic medical
records and mandating the adoption of CMS’ clinical data elements (CDEs) is an
opportunity to replace CMN and DIFs. They reasoned that the CDEs include all Medicare
documentation requirements to complete a DMEPOS order and allows the process of
collecting all the documentation requirements and communicating with the prescriber
more efficient. Concern was expressed that the current process is burdensome on the
supplier and the physician, and ultimately affects beneficiary access to DMEPOS items
as suppliers use time and resources to obtain paperwork that would otherwise be spent
servicing beneficiaries.
Response:
CMS appreciates the suggestion and concern expressed by this commenter but the
current environment for claims payment relies on the data elements provided on the
CMN or DIF. As CMS claims payment moves to a more automated, electronic
environment, we will consider eliminating CMNs and DIFs.

Comment:
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) received a comment from a
company that develops and markets orthopedic medical products. The commenter
requests consideration for the modification of CMS-847 with revision to the wording of
questions 6 and the removal of question 12 on the form.

Response:
CMS thanks the commenter for suggested changes to questions on the CMN form.
At this time, due to the edits in the claims systems, we are not making any changes
to the CMN forms. As we stated above, CMNs and DIFs are an integral resource
for claims payments. As the claims environment changes to become more
automated, CMS will at that time, reevaluate suggested changes to the questions on
these forms. We will keep this suggestion on file until that time.


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleCMS Response to Public Comments Received for CMS-10150
AuthorThomas E. Dudley
File Modified2020-02-26
File Created2020-02-26

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy