AD19-16 (without attachments), publiched in Fed. Reg.

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

32908

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices

Applicants: Young Gas Storage
Company, Ltd.
Description: Compliance filing Update
to Initial Base Settlement Rates and
Update to ADWQ Curve Compliance to
be effective 7/1/2019.
Filed Date: 6/28/19.
Accession Number: 20190628–5222.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/10/19.
Docket Numbers: RP19–1350–000.
Applicants: Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing: TETLP
EPC AUG 2019 FILING to be effective 8/
1/2019.
Filed Date: 6/28/19.
Accession Number: 20190628–5248.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/10/19.
Docket Numbers: RP19–1351–000.
Applicants: Northern Natural Gas
Company.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing:
20190628 Negotiated Rate to be effective
7/1/2019.
Filed Date: 6/28/19.
Accession Number: 20190628–5260.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/10/19.
Docket Numbers: RP19–1352–000.
Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company, L.L.C.
Description: § 4(d) Rate Filing:
Volume No. 2- Castleton Commodities
Merchant Trading L.P. SP348168 to be
effective 5/1/2019.
Filed Date: 6/28/19.
Accession Number: 20190628–5264.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/10/19.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: July 2, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–14641 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:32 Jul 09, 2019

Jkt 247001

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. AD19–16–000]

Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–922); Comment
Request
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection
and request for comments.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission or FERC) staff is soliciting
public comment on the reinstatement
and revision of the FERC–922,
Performance Metrics for ISOs, RTOs,
and Regions Outside ISOs and RTOs.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due September 9, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(identified by Docket No. AD19–16–000)
by either of the following methods:
• eFiling at Commission’s Website:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: All submissions must be
formatted and filed in accordance with
submission guidelines at: http://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. For user assistance contact
FERC Online Support by email at
[email protected], or by phone
at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202)
502–8659 for TTY.
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/docs-filing.asp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darren Sheets may be reached at
[email protected] by email or
telephone at (202) 502–8742.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: FERC–922, Performance Metrics
for ISOs, RTOs, and Regions Outside
ISOs and RTOs.
OMB Control No: 1902–0262.1
SUMMARY:

1 The Commission previously had Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the
information collection FERC–922 under OMB
Control No. 1902–0262. On August 7, 2018,
Commission staff requested that OMB discontinue
this information collection. OMB approval for the
information collection was discontinued on August
31, 2018. Commission staff plans to request
authority from OMB to reinstate the information

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Type of Request: Reinstatement of the
FERC–922 information collection, with
revisions.
Abstract: In September 2008, the
United States Government
Accountability Office (GAO) issued a
report recommending that the
Commission, among other actions, work
with Regional Transmission
Organizations (RTOs), Independent
System Operators (ISOs), stakeholders,
and other experts to develop
standardized metrics to track the
performance of RTO/ISO operations and
markets and publicly report on those
metrics.2 In accordance with the 2008
GAO Report, Commission staff
developed a set of standardized metrics
(the Common Metrics), sought and
received OMB approval to collect
information on those metrics from the
RTOs/ISOs, and later non-RTOs/ISOs,
and ultimately issued five public reports
(Common Metrics Reports).3
In December 2017, the GAO issued a
report on the RTOs/ISOs with
centralized capacity markets.4 Among
other recommendations, the GAO found
that the Commission should take steps
to improve the quality of the data
collected for its Common Metrics
Report, such as implementing improved
data quality checks and, where feasible,
ensuring RTOs/ISOs are reporting
consistent metrics over time by
standardizing definitions; and that the
Commission should develop and
document an approach to regularly
collection FERC–922, with certain revisions, as
described in more detail herein. See 44 U.S.C. 3507
(2012).
2 U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO–08–987,
Electricity Restructuring: FERC Could Take
Additional Steps to Analyze Regional Transmission
Organizations’ Benefits and Performance (2008)
(2008 GAO Report).
3 In 2010 and 2011, Commission staff issued
reports authored by the RTOs/ISOs. In 2012,
Commission staff issued a report concerning the
addition of non-RTO/ISO regions to the common
metrics effort. In 2014 and 2016, Commission staff
issued reports using aggregated data on the RTO/
ISO and non-RTO/ISO regions. For copies of the
previous reports, see Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, RTO/ISO Performance Metrics (last
updated Aug. 3, 2017), available at http://
www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/rto/rtoiso-performance.asp (providing links to ISO/RTO
Performance Metrics, Docket No. AD10–5–000 (Oct.
21, 2010); Report to Congress on Performance
Metrics for Independent System Operators and
Regional Transmission Organizations, Docket No.
AD10–5–000 (Apr. 2011); Performance Metrics in
Regions Outside ISOs and RTOs, Docket No. AD12–
8–000 (Oct. 15, 2012); Common Metrics, Docket No.
AD14–15–000 (Aug. 26, 2014); and Common
Metrics Report, Docket No. AD14–15–000 (Aug.
2016, revised Aug. 2017)).
4 U.S. Gov’t Accountability Off., GAO–18–131,
Electricity Markets: Four Regions Use Capacity
Markets to Help Ensure Adequate Resources, but
FERC Has Not Fully Assessed Their Performance,
(2017), available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/
690/689293.pdf (2017 GAO Report).

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

identify, assess, and respond to risks
that capacity markets face.
In response to the 2017 GAO Report,
Commission staff has proposed changes
to the Common Metrics information
collection. First, Commission staff
proposes to improve the data collection
process by creating a standardized
information collection Input
Spreadsheet and an updated, more
detailed User Guide, which will provide
guidance on completing the information
collection, including information about
who should respond, the timeline for
responses, the metrics being collected,
including important definitions and a
description of the types of metrics and
their structure in the information
collection, and how to properly use the
reporting form. Also, Commission staff
proposes to update the list of Common
Metrics to focus on centrally-organized
energy markets and capacity markets,
which involves adding capacity market
metrics. The update also involves the
elimination of previously collected
metrics on reliability, RTO/ISO billing
controls and customer satisfaction,
interconnection and transmission
processes, and system lambda.
Commission staff proposes eliminating
these metrics because they provide
limited information, are reported
publicly elsewhere, or do not
significantly help Commission staff or
the public draw any conclusions
regarding the benefits of an RTO/ISO.
The revised data collection, after
additions and deletions, consists of 29
Common Metrics.
In addition to eliminating certain
metrics and adding new ones, the
Common Metrics are now organized
into three groups: Group 1 metrics are
designed to be collected from all
respondents (i.e., all the RTOs/ISOs and
non-RTO/ISO utilities). There are seven
Group 1 metrics: Reserve Margins,
Average Heat Rates, Fuel Diversity,
Capacity Factor by Technology Type,
Energy Emergency Alerts (EEA Level 1
or Higher), Performance by Technology
Type during EEA Level 1 or Higher, and
Resource Availability (Equivalent

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:32 Jul 09, 2019

Jkt 247001

Forced Outage Rate Demand (EFORd)).
Group 2 metrics pertain to organized
energy markets, and thus are designed
to be collected only from respondents
with such energy markets (i.e., all the
RTOs/ISOs). There are 12 Group 2
metrics: Number and Capacity of
Reliability Must-Run Units, Reliability
Must-Run Contract Usage, Demand
Response Capability, Unit Hours
Mitigated, Wholesale Power Costs by
Charge Type, Price Cost Markup, Fuel
Adjusted Wholesale Energy Price,
Energy Market Price Convergence,
Congestion Management,
Administrative Cost, New Entrant Net
Revenues, and Order No. 825 Shortage
Intervals and Reserve Price Impacts.5
Finally, Group 3, the new metrics,
pertain to organized capacity markets,
and thus are designed to be collected
only from respondents with such
capacity markets (i.e., all RTOs/ISOs
with capacity markets). There are 10
Group 3 metrics: Net Cost of New Entry
(Net CONE) Value, Resource
Deliverability, New Capacity (Entry),
Capacity Retirement (Exit), Forecasted
Demand, Capacity Market Procurement
and Prices, Capacity Obligations and
Performance Assessment Events,
Capacity Eligible for Bonus Payments
for Over-Performance, Capacity Facing
Penalty Payments for UnderPerformance, Total Capacity Bonus
Payments and Penalties. A table
showing the revised Common Metrics
organized by the three groups can be
found at the back of this Notice. Also,
the updated User Guide for the
information collection, and the
standardized information collection
reporting form are attached to this
Notice. These attachments will not be
published in the Federal Register, but
will be available as part of this notice in
the Commission’s eLibrary system.
Commission staff has had informal
contact with stakeholders about the
5 Settlement Intervals and Shortage Pricing in
Markets Operated by Regional Transmission
Organizations and Independent System Operators,
Order No. 825, 155 FERC 61,276 (2016).

PO 00000

Frm 00051

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

32909

proposed revisions to the set of
Common Metrics, including the
proposed revisions to improve the
quality of data collected and to enhance
the Common Metrics Report with
capacity market metrics. Specifically,
Commission staff has contacted
representatives of the ISO/RTO Council,
the Edison Electric Institute, American
Wind Energy Association, American
Public Power Association, and the
Energy Information Administration.
Commission staff has assured itself,
by means of internal review, that there
is specific, objective support for the
burden estimates associated with the
information collection requirements.
Estimate of Annual Burden: 6
Commission staff expects that
respondents will submit information on
the Common Metrics every two years.
Commission staff will request a threeyear approval from OMB, so the
voluntary information collection would
happen in Years 1 and 3.7
The following table sets forth the
estimated annual burden and cost 8 for
this information collection:
BILLING CODE 2019–14669–P
6 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, see 5 CFR 1320.3 (2018).
7 The OMB approval is for a maximum of three
years.
8 See generally Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2017
(last modified Mar. 30, 2018), available at:
Computer Systems Analysts (15–1121) https://
www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes151121.htm; Lawyers
(23–1011) https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/
oes231011.htm; Electrical Engineers (17–2071)
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes172071.htm;
Economists (19–3011) https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes193011.htm; Chief Executives (11–1011)
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes111011.htm.
See Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation, News Release USDL–18–
1941 (Dec. 14, 2018), available at https://
www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm. Those
hourly wages (plus benefits) are: $107.61 for the
Metrics Data Collection and Write Performance
Analysis categories, and $122.81 for the
Management Review component which is solely
based on the Chief Executive wage rates.

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1

32910

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 2019–14669–C

Explanation of the Table: The
Number of Respondents (1) in the first
column varies by Group, as all
respondents do not provide information
on each of the 29 Common Metrics.
Commission staff has estimated the
number of respondents for the first three
Groups based on the assumption that
the six jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs and the
five non-RTO/ISO utilities (11 total
respondents) that previously responded
to the FERC–922 information collection
will provide responses to this revised
FERC–922 information collection.
Therefore, the estimated number of
respondents in Group 1 is 11, because
all respondents report on the Group 1
metrics. The estimated number of
respondents for Group 2 is six, because
only the jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs with
energy markets respond to the Group 2
metrics. Likewise, the estimated number
of respondents in Group 3 is four,
because only the jurisdictional RTOs/
ISOs with capacity markets respond to
the Group 3 metrics. Finally, the table
includes a burden estimate for potential
new respondents. As all the
jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs previously
responded to FERC–922, any potential
new respondent would be a utility in a
non-RTO/ISO region, and thus would
only be submitting responses to the
Group 1 metrics, but for the first time.
Commission staff conservatively
estimates that, at most, one new non-

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:32 Jul 09, 2019

Jkt 247001

RTO/ISO utility will respond to this
revised FERC–922 information
collection.
The second column, Number of
Responses in Years 1 & 3 (2) is
characterized by the number of
Balancing Authority Areas (BAAs) each
respondent would be reporting on, as
the respondent would provide a
response to each metric for each of its
BAAs. Each RTO/ISO is a single BAA
and therefore will only provide
responses to each metric for one BAA,
but utilities in the non-RTO/ISO regions
that previously responded have reported
metrics for more than one BAA (for
instance, Duke Energy has multiple
BAAs outside of RTOs/ISOs and filed
metrics for each BAA in the previous
information collection). Therefore, the
estimated number of responses for
Group 1 (all RTOs/ISOs and non-RTO/
ISO utilities) is the number of BAAs in
the RTOs/ISOs, i.e., six, plus the
number of non-RTO/ISO BAAs i.e., 10,
which equals 16 total responses. The
estimated number of responses for
Group 2 (all RTOs/ISOs with energy
markets) is the same as the number of
respondents, i.e., six, as only the RTOs/
ISOs respond and they each only have
one BAA. The estimated number of
responses for Group 3 (all RTOs/ISOs
with capacity markets) is the same as
the number of respondents, i.e., four, as
only the four RTOs/ISOs with capacity

PO 00000

Frm 00052

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

markets respond and they each only
have one BAA. Finally, there is only
estimated to be one non-RTO/ISO utility
as a potential new respondent, who
would only be responding to the Group
1 metrics that apply to all respondents.
The Annual Frequency of Filings (3)
is 0.67 for all groups. This fraction
reflects that there will be two
information collections or one each
during Years 1 and 3 of the three-year
OMB authorization period, so 2⁄3 or 0.67
is the adjustment to reflect a yearly
value for the burden.
The Total Number of Annual
Responses (4) is the product of the
second column, Number of Responses
in Years 1 and 3 (2), multiplied by the
third, the Annual Frequency of Filings
(3). Thus for the first group, this value
is 16 × 0.67 or 10.72.
The Estimated Burden Hours per
Response (5) reflects the total number of
estimated burden hours, separated into
the three reporting categories (collect,
write, review) for all four groups of
respondents. The total estimated burden
hours for the first three groups of
respondents are the same as the
previous FERC–922 information
collection burden estimates, 401 hours.
An increased estimate of the burden
hours, 427 hours, is for Potential New
Respondents, in recognition of the fact
that the burden on a new respondent is
likely higher. The number of hours in

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1

EN10JY19.000

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

each reporting category has been
adjusted in this collection, as compared
to the previous FERC–922 collection
burden estimate, to reflect less emphasis
on the writing category, as Commission
staff has developed a structured data
collection tool which will decrease the
amount of written text that respondents
will provide in the information
collection.9
The Estimated Cost per Response (6)
is the product of the three variables: The
Estimated Burden Hours per Response
(5) for a category, multiplied by the
labor rate (for wages plus benefits) for
each category (which is not shown in
the table), multiplied by the proportion
of total hours attributable to this Group,
to report on a category, e.g., the number
of metrics in that Group divided by the
total number of metrics (also not shown
in table). An example in the first row is
that for Group 1, Metrics Data Collection
category, the $7,039 is the product of
271 hours in column (5) multiplied by
the weighted average labor rate for that
category ($107.61) multiplied by 0.242
(the ratio of metrics in the first Group,
seven, to the total number of metrics, 29
or 7 ÷ 29). This fraction is not displayed
in the table.10
The Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours (7) is the product of the Total
Number of Annual Responses (4) times
the Estimated Burden Hours per
Response (5). For the first row of the
first group this value is 2,905 hours =
10.72 × 271 hours.
Finally, the Estimated Total Annual
Cost (8) reflects the total burden to the
industry and is calculated by
multiplying the Total Number of
Annual Responses (4) times the
Estimated Cost per Response (6) for each
category for all groups and produces an
estimated total cost in the last row of the
table. The wage rates utilized in this
burden estimate have been updated to
recent Bureau of Labor Statistics
estimates for the same categories as used
in the prior burden estimates for the
FERC–922 information collection (i.e.,
Computer Systems Analysts, Lawyers,
Electrical Engineers, Economists, and
the category Chief Executive). Wage
estimates use the 90th percentile wage
from the recent Bureau of Labor
Employees Benefit Survey, adjusted
9 The estimated hours per response has increased
for: (a) Metrics Data Collection component to 271
hours (from 229 hours), and (b) Management
Review component to 60 hours (from 33 hours). The
estimated hours per response for Write Performance
Analysis has decreased to 70 hours (from 139
hours).
10 The fraction for Group 1 and the Potential New
Respondents is 0.242 (the seven metrics in the first
Group divided by the total number of metrics, 29);
for Group 2 the fraction is 0.414 (12 divided by 29);
for Group 3 the fraction is 0.345 (10 divided by 29).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:32 Jul 09, 2019

Jkt 247001

upward for the private industry benefits
of 30.3 percent, and are a weighted
average of those categories.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Further, Commission staff requests
comments on whether the proposed
metrics (attached) will effectively track
the performance of the RTO/ISO energy
and capacity markets and the
administrative and market functions
that are common to the RTOs/ISOs and
the individual utilities in non-RTO/ISO
regions.
Dated: July 3, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–14669 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #2
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC19–108–000.
Applicants: Valentine Solar, LLC,
Glaciers Edge Wind Project, LLC.
Description: Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Valentine
Solar, LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 7/1/19.
Accession Number: 20190701–5401.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/22/19.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER10–2290–007.
Applicants: Avista Corporation.
Description: Triennial Market Power
Update for the Northwest Region of
Avista Corporation.
Filed Date: 7/1/19.
Accession Number: 20190701–5387.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/19.
Docket Numbers: ER10–2475–019;
ER10–2474–019; ER10–3246–013;

PO 00000

Frm 00053

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

32911

ER12–21–021; ER13–1266–022; ER15–
2211–019.
Applicants: Nevada Power Company,
Sierra Pacific Power Company,
PacifiCorp, Agua Caliente Solar, LLC,
CalEnergy, LLC, MidAmerican Energy
Service LLC.
Description: Updated Market Power
Analysis for the Northwest Region of the
BHE Northwest Entities.
Filed Date: 6/28/19.
Accession Number: 20190628–5333.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/27/19.
Docket Numbers: ER10–2739–025;
ER10–1892–012; ER13–1430–006;
ER13–1561–006; ER16–1652–013;
ER17–1490–001; ER19–170–001.
Applicants: LS Power Marketing, LLC,
Arlington Valley Solar Energy II, LLC,
Centinela Solar Energy, LLC, Columbia
Energy LLC, Gateway Energy Storage,
LLC, LifeEnergy, LLC, Vista Energy
Storage, LLC.
Description: Updated Market Power
Analysis for the Southwest Region of LS
Power Marketing, LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 7/1/19.
Accession Number: 20190701–5414.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/19.
Docket Numbers: ER10–2822–014;
ER10–3158–008; ER10–3161–008;
ER10–3162–008; ER12–308–008; ER16–
1238–002; ER16–1250–006; ER17–1242–
001; ER17–1392–002.
Applicants: Atlantic Renewable
Projects II LLC, Avangrid Arizona
Renewables, LLC, Avangrid
Renewables, LLC, El Cabo Wind LLC,
Dillon Wind LLC, Manzana Wind LLC,
Mountain View Power Partners III, LLC,
Shiloh I Wind Project, LLC, Tule Wind
LLC.
Description: Updated Market Power
Analysis of the Avangrid Southwest
MBR Sellers.
Filed Date: 7/1/19.
Accession Number: 20190701–5415.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/19.
Docket Numbers: ER15–1596–008;
ER10–2590–006; ER10–2593–006;
ER10–2616–015; ER11–4400–012;
ER15–1599–008; ER15–1958–007;
ER19–102–001.
Applicants: Dynegy Commercial Asset
Management, LLC, Dynegy Energy
Services (East), LLC, Dynegy Marketing
and Trade, LLC, Dynegy Moss Landing,
LLC, Dynegy Oakland, LLC, Dynegy
Power Marketing, LLC, Dynegy
Resources Management, LLC, Luminant
Energy Company LLC.
Description: Updated Triennial
Market Power Analysis for the
Southwest Region by the Vistra
Southwest MBR Sellers.
Filed Date: 7/1/19.
Accession Number: 20190701–5416.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/19.

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1