Download:
pdf |
pdfPage 1 of 4
Print Date: 11/17/20
Title:
Exposure to arsenic and uranium from private wells in Connecticut, New Hampshire and New Mexico
Project Id:
0900f3eb81bd1920
Accession #:
NCEH-HST-9/1/20-d1920
Project Contact:
Backer_Lorraine (lfb9)
Organization:
NCEH/ATSDR/DEHSP/EMRCB/HST
Status:
Project In Progress
Intended Use:
Project Determination
Estimated Start Date:
02/05/2021
Estimated Completion Date:
09/30/2022
CDC/ATSDR HRPO/IRB Protocol #:
NA
OMB Control #:
GenIC under: 0929-1173
Determinations
Determination
Completed
Entered By & Role
9/8/20
Davis_Stephanie I. (sgd8) CIO HSC
PRA:
PRA Applies
9/9/20
Davis_Stephanie I. (sgd8) CIO OMB / PRA
ICRO:
Returned with No
Decision
9/9/20
Zirger_Jeffrey (wtj5) ICRO Reviewer
HSC:
Does NOT Require HRPO
Review
Justification
Not Research / Other
45 CFR 46.102(l)
Non-Epi Aids Investigations
Description & Funding
Description
Priority:
Urgent
Date Needed:
09/04/2020
Priority Justification:
We need to get the approved protocol back to Connecticut so that their IRB can complete their review in
September.
Determination Start Date:
09/01/20
Description:
The purpose of this investigation is to respond to three states (Connecticut, New Hampshire, and New Mexico) that
have requested assistance with assessing potential exposure to naturally-occurring arsenic and uranium in drinking
water from private wells in areas (one area for each state) where there are no data about arsenic and uranium
concentrations in ground water (Ayotte et al, 2017). The new information obtained from these investigations will be
the description of exposure to contaminants in drinking water from private wells within a well-defined time period
and geographic distribution. This information will be used by the requesting agencies to target their respective
existing public health intervention activities to reduce exposures.
IMS/CIO/Epi-Aid/Chemical Exposure
Submission:
No
IMS Activation Name:
Not selected
Primary Priority of the Project:
Not selected
Secondary Priority(s) of the Project:
Not selected
Task Force Associated with the Response:
Not selected
CIO Emergency Response Name:
Not selected
Epi-Aid Name:
Not selected
Assessment of Chemical Exposure Name:
Not selected
Goals/Purpose
We will collect new data on the concentrations of arsenic and uranium in private well source water, household tap
water, and urine as well as information from private well owners that will allow us to comprehensively assess
exposures to these contaminants.
Objective:
Collect new data on arsenic and uranium concentrations in private well water in areas where there are no data.
Use biomonitoring and an individual exposure survey data to assess the association between concentrations of
arsenic and uranium in drinking water obtained from a private well and levels of arsenic and uranium in urine.
Use water quality testing, biomonitoring, and exposure survey results to support state-based outreach, education,
and mitigation efforts.
Activities or Tasks:
New Collection of Information, Data, or Biospecimens
Target Populations to be
Included/Represented:
General US Population
Tags/Keywords:
Water quality, Arsenic, uranium, Drinking Water
CDC's Role:
CDC employees or agents will obtain or use identifiable (including coded) private data or biological specimens, CDC
employees will participate as co-authors in presentation(s) or publication(s), CDC employees will provide
substantial technical assistance or oversight, CDC is providing funding
Method Categories:
Convenience Sample
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81b... 11/17/2020
Page 2 of 4
Methods:
For this project, we will assess exposure to arsenic and uranium in private well water in areas of concern to our
public health partners. We will collect new data on the concentrations of arsenic and uranium in private well source
water, household tap water, and urine as well as obtain information about potential exposure to arsenic and
uranium by asking participants to complete a food log and an exposure survey. Three public health partners (the
state health/environmental protection agencies of Connecticut, New Hampshire, and New Mexico) have identified
areas where there are no data describing the concentrations of arsenic and uranium in ground water that is the
source for private wells (see Attachment A, Letters of Collaboration). We will create a grid across each area and
randomly choose 100 cells from each grid. We will collaborate with our public health partners to identify households
with private wells within the selected cells and obtain contact information for private well owners. If there are no
households identified in a cell, we will skip the cell and add a household from the neighboring cell to supplement
the absence of a household in the selected cell. A combination of Google & ESRI geolocation services & base maps,
E-911 GIS files, and tax assessors’ maps where available are used to identify household addresses. These are run
inside of an ArcGIS program such as ArcMap and more currently ArcPro for a few reasons. First, the tool that is run
to grid geographic areas and generate points within grid cells runs in ArcGIS. Second, most of the identification of
homes is visual – more likely than not, the point that the program generates is not going to be sitting on the
house. It is then up to the user to visually determine the nearest eligible household. The user must try to
determine if the structure seen on the map is a household or a business, on public water or private, and abandoned
or inhabited. An alternative approach would be to feed a fixed list of possible sites into the program, but this is
generally not recommended because these lists are often incomplete and often have incorrectly geolocated points,
which spatially biases the program. USGS reports that they recruit about 30% to 50% of people who receive
notification of an upcoming water quality investigation like this. Thus, we will send out letters and prepaid
postcards to a random sample of 200-300 households within the chosen cells in each state (see Attachment B,
Invitation Letter) in order to enroll 100 households with private wells from each state (one household per cell). We
will ask interested people to verify their name, address, and contact information and mail the prepaid postcard
back to us. From the postcards, we will create a database to facilitate contacting potential recruits to conduct a
brief telephone screening survey and, if appropriate, enroll them in the investigation. We will enroll 100 participants
in each state (see Attachment C, Screening Survey). At enrollment, we will make arrangements to send
participants a 3-day Food Log and materials to collect a urine specimen. We will also schedule appointments to visit
the households where we will do the following: 1. Obtain a signed consent form 2. Collect well water and tap water
samples 3. Collect the urine specimen 4. Review and collect the Food Log 5. Conduct the exposure survey with one
adult in each household (see Attachments D, E, F, G; Consent Form, Food Log, Urine
Collection of Info, Data or Biospecimen:
We will collect new data on the concentrations of arsenic and uranium in private well source water, household tap
water, and urine as well as information from private well owners that will allow us to comprehensively assess
exposures to these contaminants. At enrollment, we will make arrangements to send participants a 3-day Food Log
and materials to collect a urine specimen. We will also schedule appointments to visit the households where we will
do the following: 1. Obtain a signed consent form 2. Collect well water and tap water samples 3. Collect the urine
specimen 4. Review and collect the Food Log 5. Conduct the exposure survey with one adult in each household see
Attachments D, E, F, G; Consent Form, Food Log, Urine Collection Directions, and Exposure Survey, respectively).
We will not ask questions about symptoms or health status. We will ask you about medications you take because
that is important in helping us interpret exposure information. Project staff will provide investigation participants
with their well water sample and urine specimen test results and information about exposure reduction when
appropriate.
Expected Use of Findings/Results:
The primary audience for the results of this project is state public health partners responsible for private wells in
their own jurisdictions. They will use their data to inform decisions about ongoing and future efforts in outreach,
education, and mitigation for private well owners. We will share the protocol and associated documents for their
review and comment.
Could Individuals potentially be identified
based on Information Collected?
Yes
Will PII be captured (including coded data)? Yes
Does CDC have access to the identifiers?
Yes
Is an assurance of confidentiality in place or No
planned?
Is a certificate of confidentiality in place or
planned?
No
Is there a formal written agreement
prohibiting the release of identifiers?
No
Funding
Funding Type
Funding Title
Funding #
Original Budget Yr
# Years Award
Other-Interagency agreement
14FED406345-001
$99,035.00
2020
2
HSC Review
HSC Attributes
Non-Epi Aids Investigations
Yes
Additional Ethical
Considerations
This activity is non-research. The methods
described are systematic, yet the results for each
site are not intended to be generalizable beyond
the geographic boundaries of the investigation
area of private wells identified by each state
health department. Data will be analyzed for each
state, and will not be aggregated across the three
states.
Regulation and Policy
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81b... 11/17/2020
Page 3 of 4
Do you anticipate this project will be
submitted to the IRB office
No
Estimated number of study participants
Population - Children
Population - Minors
Population - Prisoners
Population - Pregnant Women
Population - Emancipated Minors
Suggested level of risk to subjects Do you anticipate this project will be exempt research or non-exempt research
Requested consent process waviers
Informed consent for adults
No Selection
Children capable of providing assent
No Selection
Parental permission
No Selection
Alteration of authorization under HIPPA
Privacy Rule
No Selection
Requested Waivers of Documentation of Informed Consent
Informed consent for adults
No Selection
Children capable of providing assent
No Selection
Parental permission
No Selection
Consent process shown in an understandable language
Reading level has been estimated
No Selection
Comprehension tool is provided
No Selection
Short form is provided
No Selection
Translation planned or performed
No Selection
Certified translation / translator
No Selection
Translation and back-translation to/from
target language(s)
No Selection
Other method
No Selection
Clinical Trial
Involves human participants
No Selection
Assigned to an intervention
No Selection
Evaluate the effect of the intervention
No Selection
Evaluation of a health related biomedical or
behavioral outcome
No Selection
Registerable clinical trial
No Selection
Other Considerations
Exception is requested to PHS informing
those bested about HIV serostatus
No Selection
Human genetic testing is planned now or in
the future
No Selection
Involves long-term storage of identfiable
biological specimens
No Selection
Involves a drug, biologic, or device
No Selection
Conducted under an Investigational New
Drug exemption or Investigational Device
Exemption
No Selection
Institutions & Staff
Institutions
Name
FWA #
FWA Exp Date
IRB Title
IRB Exp Date
Funding #
USGS
$99,035.00
Staff
Staff
Member
SIQT Exp.
Date
CITI Biomedical
Exp. Date
CITI Social &
Behavioral Exp.
Date
Diana Diaz
09/02/2023
Kristin
Marks
07/16/2023
08/29/2022
02/04/2023
Lorraine
Backer
05/18/2021
04/12/2020
12/21/2021
CITI Good Clinical
Practice Exp. Date
Staff Role
Email
Phone
Organization
Co-Investigator
[email protected]
404-4983060
HEALTH
STUDIES
08/29/2022
Co-Investigator
[email protected]
770-4883414
HEALTH
STUDIES
04/13/2020
Principal
Investigator
[email protected]
770488-6
HEALTH
STUDIES
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81b... 11/17/2020
Page 4 of 4
Data
DMP
Proposed Data Collection Start Date:
2/5/21
Proposed Data Collection End Date:
9/30/22
Proposed Public Access Level:
Public
Public Access Justification:
Private well water analysis results will be made available by USGS on their website. Well locations will be masked
using GIS to ensure that wells and well owners cannot be identified.
How Access Will Be Provided for Data:
Private well water analysis results will be made available by USGS on their website. Well locations will be masked
using GIS to ensure that wells and well owners cannot be identified. Data including study participant survey
responses will only be available in aggregated form in a peer-reviewed publication.
Plans for Archival and Long Term
Preservation:
We will use only investigation IDs when communicating with laboratories for water testing and biomonitoring
results. The ID key will be kept separately from the investigation data and will be destroyed once all the data have
been analyzed, or by December 31, 2030.
Spatiality
Country
State/Province
United States
Connecticut
United States
New Hampshire
United States
New Mexico
County/Region
Dataset
Dataset
Title
Dataset
Description
Data
Publisher/Owner
Public
Access
Level
Public Access
Justification
External
Access URL
Download
URL
Type of Data
Released
Collection
Start Date
Collection
End Date
Dataset yet to be added...
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81b... 11/17/2020
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSumm |
Author | sgd8 |
File Modified | 2020-11-17 |
File Created | 2020-11-17 |