To
what extent has the state built or enhanced partnerships for SV
prevention?
|
#
and types of new public/private partnerships established
#
and types of public/private partnerships maintained
#
and types of state action plan activities partners support
(e.g., implementation, evaluation)
Ways
partners contribute to RPE programs
Roles
of partners
#
and types of partners working together
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
To
what extent has the recipient used data to select and prioritize
the sub-recipients, the prevention strategies and approaches and
the population of focus?
|
#
and types of actions taken based on data
#
and types of data used to inform program improvement
#
and types of data use/share agreements
#
and types of indicators available at beginning of NOFO vs. at
end of NOFO
#
and types of indicators with data available
#
and types indicators where data should exist but have barriers
to access
Types
of data used (e.g. to select prevention approaches, target
populations, and sub-recipients)
Documented
uses of data
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
To
what extent have selected prevention strategies been implemented
in the state?
|
#
and types of prevention programs, policies and practices (i.e.,
approaches) implemented
#
of implemented community/societal level approaches
Progress
on implementation objectives (e.g., # completed vs. in progress)
#
of implementation cycles
#
and types of individuals, organizations or communities reached
#
and types of adaptations made to prevention approaches
#
and types of environmental and community changes
#
of activities, sessions, projects, or products (dose) delivered
#
and types of implementers
#
and types of adaptations
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
Which
factors are critical for implementing selected prevention
strategies and approaches?
|
Facilitators
and barriers to State Action Planning
Facilitators
and barriers to Evaluation
Facilitators
and barriers to Implementation
Facilitators
and barriers to Partnership
Facilitators
and barriers to Data Use
Contextual
Factors
|
x
|
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
To
what extent have targeted risk and protective factors for SV
outcomes changed at the state level?
|
#
and types of outcomes being measured
#
and types of indicators being tracked
#
and types (process vs. outcome) of activities implemented from
the evaluation plan
Percentage/proportion/rate
change in SV indicators from year to year
#,
% or rate change in targeted risk and protective factors
#
of community-level risk and protective factors addressed by
selected prevention approaches
Ways
and types of progress made towards prevention
Results
from recipients’ program evaluation
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
To
what extent are sub-recipient activities aligned with state
level goals and outcomes stated in the state action plan and
recipient work plan?
|
#
of funded prevention program/policies and practices that align
directly with state level goals
#
of prevention approaches and strategies aligned with NOFO
requirements
#
of sub-recipients funded to implement prevention approaches and
strategies
#
of common state and local level outcomes
|
x
|
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
|
x
|
To
what extent do recipients address health equity?
|
Specific
types of population or setting of focus with health disparities
#
and types of prevention strategies focused on addressing
specific population or setting of focus
Characteristics
of population or setting of focus
#
and types of partners engaged to address health equity
Ways
and progress towards addressing health equity
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
How
does recipient capacity change over time?
|
#
and types of resources obtained and used
#
and types of data sources and access
#
and types of communication products used, developed, or
disseminated
#
and types of training and technical assistance delivered and
provided
#
and types of data sources
#
and types of actions taken to increase capacity
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
x
|
|
|
x
|
x
|