HSWMS: Disposal of CCR; A Holistic Approach to Closure Part B: Alternate Demonstration for Unlined Surface Impoundments; Implementation of Closure; Legacy Units (Proposed Rule)
ICR 202003-2050-001
OMB: 2050-0223
Federal Form Document
⚠️ Notice: This information collection may be outdated. More recent filings for OMB 2050-0223 can be found here:
HSWMS: Disposal of CCR; A
Holistic Approach to Closure Part B: Alternate Demonstration for
Unlined Surface Impoundments; Implementation of Closure; Legacy
Units (Proposed Rule)
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
OMB files this
comment in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.11( c ). This OMB action is
not an approval to conduct or sponsor an information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This action has no
effect on any current approvals. If OMB has assigned this ICR a new
OMB Control Number, the OMB Control Number will not appear in the
active inventory. For future submissions of this information
collection, reference the OMB Control Number provided.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
On April 17, 2015, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) promulgated national minimum
criteria for existing and new coal combustion residuals (CCR)
landfills and existing and new CCR surface impoundments. In this
action, EPA is proposing procedures to allow facilities to request
approval to operate with an alternate liner for existing CCR
surface impoundments, two co-proposed options to allow the use of
CCR during unit closure, an additional closure option for CCR units
being closed by removal of CCR, and requirements for annual closure
progress reports. On August 21, 2018 the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit issued its opinion in the case of
Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, et al v. EPA which vacated
and remanded the provision that exempted inactive impoundments at
inactive facilities from the CCR rule. As a first step to implement
this part of the court decision, EPA is also seeking comments and
data on inactive CCR surface impoundments at inactive utilities to
assist in the development of future regulations for these CCR
units.
The estimated annual respondent
burden has increased by either 17,301 hours (assuming Provision 2,
Co-Proposed Option 1 is included) or 20,170 hours (assuming
Provision 2, Co-Proposed Option 2 is included) in total estimated
respondent burden compared with that identified in the information
collection most recently approved respondent burden by OMB
associated with the CCR program (175,319 hours). This reflects an
increase in the requirements for respondents associated with the
proposed Part B Rule. Also, the costs to the industry respondents
increased by either $5,057,325 (assuming Provision 2, Co-Proposed
Option 1 is included) or $5,863,060 (assuming Provision 2,
Co-Proposed Option 2 is included), again reflecting the additional
requirements associated with the proposed Part B Rule. While there
is an increase in ICR burden associated with the additional
reporting related to the Proposed Part B Rule, most of the burden
is voluntary and is expected to be much smaller in magnitude than
the operational cost savings related to closure extensions or the
ability to use CCR in closure, as shown in the corresponding
Regulatory Impact Analysis for this proposed rule
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.