USTR amended the
supporting statement and online portal to account for public
comments.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
12/31/2020
6 Months From Approved
50,000
0
0
100,000
0
0
10,000,000
0
0
Following an investigation, and nearly
15 years of litigation, the U.S. Trade Representative determined
that the European Union (EU) and certain member States or former
member States denied U.S. rights under the World Trade Organization
(WTO) Agreement and failed to implement WTO Dispute Settlement Body
recommendations concerning certain subsidies to the EU large civil
aircraft industry. Pursuant to the Trade Act, the U.S. Trade
Representative determined to take action in the form of additional
duties on products of certain EU member States. Periodic review of
this action is required. To assist in timely and comprehensive
review and public availability of comments in response to notices
of periodic revisions, USTR is establishing the Large Civil
Aircraft Dispute Portal and requiring use of the LCA Form.
USTR is requesting
emergency processing for this ICR because it cannot reasonably
comply with normal clearance procedures. USTR carefully evaluated
the cost and complexity of establishing its own portal to receive
and evaluate public comments based on the level of public interest
in response to the first revision notice, the difficulties in
processing the comments using Regulations.gov, and USTR’s
experience in handling a large volume of public input in connection
with the Section 301 Portal. USTR made the determination to move
forward with the Large Civil Aircraft Dispute Portal as quickly as
possible in advance of the expected next revision round. To meet
the statutory schedule for revisions, USTR must open the Large
Civil Aircraft Dispute Portal on or about June 23, 2020. Upon OMB
approval of this emergency clearance request, USTR will follow the
normal clearance procedures for the ICR.
US Code:
19
USC 2416 Name of Law: Trade Act of 1974
USTR has transitioned its
collection of public comments from the public docket on
Regulations.gov to a purpose built electronic portal available
through USTR’s website. Among other improvements to the public
comment process, the electronic portal facilitates the collection
of comments, enhances USTR’s ability to view/organize data, and
allows the public to more easily search/view public
submissions.
The U.S. Trade Representative announced the
beginning of the 120-day review of the action on December 12, 2019.
See 84 FR 67992 (December 12 notice). The December 12 notice
specifically requested public comments on: • whether the U.S. Trade
Representative should remove products of specific EU member States
from the list of products subject to additional duties or should
remain on the list. • if a product remains on the list, whether the
U.S. Trade Representative increase the current rate of additional
duty to as high as 100 percent. • whether the U.S. Trade
Representative should add additional EU products to the list. USTR
received nearly 26,000 comments in response to the December 12
notice. The U.S. Trade Representative announced certain revisions
to the action being taken in the investigation on February 14,
2020. See 85 FR 10204 (February 21, 2020), and 85 FR 14517 (March
12, 2020). Unless certain statutory conditions are met, the next
180-day revision is required on or about August 12, 2020. USTR
anticipates receiving at least as many public comments as it
received in response to the 120-day review. To facilitate review,
USTR will require use of the LCA Form.
Agency/Sub Agency
RCF ID
RCF Title
RCF Status
IC Title
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.