CMS-10722 - Supporting Statement A (CMS-2482-P version 3)

CMS-10722 - Supporting Statement A (CMS-2482-P version 3).docx

State Data Associated with Value Based Purchasing Arrangements (CMS-10722)

OMB: 0938-1385

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Supporting Statement A

State Data Associated with Value Based Purchasing Arrangements

CMS-10722 (OMB 0938-TBD)


Background


Under section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Social Security Act, we are granted the authority to require that methods and procedures be established by states relating to the utilization of, and the payment for, care and services available under the state plan process (including but not limited to utilization review plans) as may be necessary to safeguard against unnecessary utilization of such care and services and to assure that state payments to providers of Medicaid services are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care.


This 2020 information collection request is New and is associated with our June 19, 2020, proposed rule (CMS-2482-P, RIN 0938-AT82). The rule proposes, as part of the state plan approval process relative to the VBP program, new reporting requirements that would affect the 51 state Medicaid programs (the 50 states and the District of Columbia). Specifically, a State participating in value-based purchasing arrangements must report data described in § 447.518(d)(1) and (2) on an annual basis and no later than 60 days after the end of each year. The reported data would include: the State name, National drug code(s) (for drugs covered under the VBP), product FDA list name, number of prescriptions, cost to the State to administer VBP (for example: systems changes, tracking evidence or outcomes-based measures, etc.), and the total savings generated by the supplemental rebate due to the VBP. The reporting requirements would be applicable to both FFS and MCO COD claims.


  1. Justification


    1. Need and Legal Basis


The reported data is being collected to safeguard against unnecessary utilization of such care and services and to assure that state payments to providers of Medicaid services are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care. CMS will collect this data to ensure that VBP programs adopted by states continue to meet these standards.


The authority to collect this data is 1902(a)(30)(A) which requires require that methods and procedures be established by states relating to the utilization of, and the payment for, care and services available under the state plan process (including but not limited to utilization review plans) as may be necessary to safeguard against unnecessary utilization of such care and services and to assure that state payments to providers of Medicaid services are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care.


    1. Information Users


CMS will request that the collection be in a spreadsheet format that will collect state data elements specific to the VBP arrangement that the state has entered into and the requirements set forth, if finalized, in CMS-2482-P. Data will be collected during (on an annual basis) and the time period will be dependent upon the length of the VBP arrangement the state has with the manufacturer. The number of respondents will be 50 states plus DC and they will be responding to CMS and CMS will use this data to assess whether the cost of entering into such agreements will save Federal and state Medicaid dollars overall thus ensuring efficient and economic operation of the Medicaid program. At this time the state will submit the spreadsheet via email from the states and CMS does not have plans to further develop a collection instrument. States will be informed of their obligation to collect the data when the state has indicated as part of their state plan that they are entering into VBP arrangements via a CMS-authorized supplemental rebate agreement. States are already required to submit a template for such arrangements to CMS as part of their state plan submission. Once they submit and CMS approves the template, they will be required to submit data on the arrangement annually.


    1. Use of Information Technology


States will be asked to submit a spreadsheet with the data elements listed via email. CMS does not believe further technology will be needed for this data request. If further advances in this collection is necessary, CMS will address as part of this collection of information request.


    1. Duplication of Efforts


This information cannot be collected from other sources at this time. The data being collected is specific to the VBP arrangement that the state negotiates with the manufacturer.


    1. Small Businesses


N/A as this data collection applies only to the states.


    1. Less Frequent Collection


The consequences of this data collection being conducted on less than an annual basis is that we will not fully understand the financial impact of such arrangements on the Medicaid program.


    1. Special Circumstances


There are no special circumstances that would require an information collection to be conducted in a manner that requires respondents to:


  • Report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • Prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • Submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

  • Retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • Collect data in connection with a statistical survey that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study,

  • Use a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

  • Include a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

  • Submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


    1. Federal Register/Outside Consultation


The proposed rule (CMS-2482-P, RIN 0938-AT82) published in the Federal Register on June 19, 2020 (85 FR 37286).



    1. Payments/Gifts to Respondents


The respondents are not receiving payments or gifts for responding to his collection.


    1. Confidentiality


There are no privacy issues (personally identifiable data) associated with this collection.



    1. Sensitive Questions


There are no sensitive questions associated with this collection. Specifically, the collection does not solicit questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


    1. Collection of Information Requirements and Annual Burden Estimates


Wage Estimates


To derive average costs, we used data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ May 2019 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates for all salary estimates (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm). In this regard the following table presents the mean hourly wage, the cost of fringe benefits and overhead (calculated at 100 percent of salary), and the adjusted hourly wage.


National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates

Occupation Title

Occupation

Code

Mean Hourly

Wage ($/hr)

Fringe Benefits and

Overhead ($/hr)

Adjusted Hourly

Wage ($/hr)

General Operations Mgr

11-1021

59.56

59.56

119.12


As indicated, we are adjusting our employee hourly wage estimates by a factor of 100 percent. This is necessarily a rough adjustment, both because fringe benefits and overhead costs vary significantly from employer to employer, and because methods of estimating these costs vary widely from study to study. Nonetheless, we believe that doubling the hourly wage to estimate total cost is a reasonably accurate estimation method.


Information Collection Requirements and Burden Estimates


Under section 1902(a)(30)(A) the Act, we are granted the authority to require that methods and procedures be established by states relating to the utilization of, and the payment for, care and services available under the state plan process (including but not limited to utilization review plans) as may be necessary to safeguard against unnecessary utilization of such care and services and to assure that state payments to providers of Medicaid services are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care.


To that end, as part of the state plan approval process relative to the VBP program, this rule proposes new reporting requirements that would affect the 51 state Medicaid programs (the 50 states and the District of Columbia). Specifically, a State participating in value-based purchasing arrangements must report data described in § 447.518(d)(1) and (2) on an annual basis and no later than 60 days after the end of each year.


The reported data would include:

-the State name,

-National drug code(s) (for drugs covered under the VBP),

-product FDA list name,

-number of prescriptions,

-cost to the State to administer VBP (for example: systems changes, tracking evidence or outcomes-based measures, etc.), and

-the total savings generated by the supplemental rebate due to the VBP.


The reporting requirements would be applicable to both FFS and MCO COD claims. Following our evaluation of the response to this proposed rule, we may decide to issue a form to help ensure that the proper information is reported at the proper address.


We estimate it would take 6 hours at $119.12/hr for a general operations manager to collect the supplemental rebate agreement VBP drug utilization information, add this data to the state’s quarterly report when due annually (we will choose the quarter in which the annual data will be due), and submit the report to CMS. In aggregate we estimate an ongoing annual burden of 306 hours (6 hr/report x 1/year x 51 respondents) at a cost of $36,444.60 (hr x $119.12/hr).


Summary of Information Collection Requirements and Burden Estimates


The following table summarizes our information collection requirements and burden estimates.


Summary of Annual Requirements and Burden

Section under Title 42 of the CFR

# of

Respondents

Responses (per year)

Total Responses

Time per Response (hours)

Total Time (hours)

Labor Rate ($/hr)

Total cost ($)

§ 447.518(d)(1) and (2)

51

1

51

6

306

$119.12

36,444.60


Information Collection Instruments and Instruction/Guidance Documents


The reporting instrument will be a spreadsheet with the data elements included (New).


    1. Capital Costs


There are no capital or start up costs associated with this collection as it collects information on data associated with the Medicaid program that would not require additional capital.


    1. Cost to Federal Government


The cost to the Federal government will only be the staff time to receive and store the collected data.


To derive average costs, we used data from OPM’s 2020 base salary for the Baltimore/Washington, D.C. region at the GS-13, step 5 level (https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2020/DCB_h.pdf). In this regard, the following table presents the mean hourly wage, the cost of fringe benefits and overhead (calculated at 100 percent of salary), and the adjusted hourly wage.


As indicated, we are adjusting our employee hourly wage estimates by a factor of 100 percent. Our estimated Federal cost associated with this collection is $4,460.


Grade (Step)

Hourly Wage ($/hr)

Fringe Benefits and Overhead ($/hr)

Adjusted Hourly Wage

($/hr)

GS-13 (step 5)

55.75

55.75

111.50


CMS Staff

(40) hours x $111.50/hour

$4,460


    1. Changes to Collection of Information Requirements, Burden, and Collection of Information Instruments


This is a New information collection request. Consequently, there are no changes.


  1. Publication/Tabulation Dates



There are no plans to publish the information.


  1. Expiration Date


The expiration date is displayed.


  1. Certification Statement


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


  1. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods


There are no statistical methods, surveys, or questionnaires associated with this collection.



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorChristine Hinds
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-13

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy