Memorandum United States Department of Education
Institute of Education Sciences
National Center for Education Statistics
DATE: June 15, 2020
TO: Robert Sivinski, OMB
THROUGH: Carrie Clarady, Avar Consulting, in contract to NCES
FROM: Maura Spiegelman, NCES
SUBJECT: 2020-21 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS 2020-21) Item Revision Change Request (OMB# 1850-0598 v.32)
The National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), conducted every two to three years by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), is a system of related questionnaires that provides descriptive data on the context of elementary and secondary education. Redesigned from the Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) with a focus on flexibility, timeliness, and integration with other ED data, the NTPS system allows for school, principal, and teacher characteristics to be analyzed in relation to one another. NTPS is an in-depth, nationally representative survey of first through twelfth grade public and private school teachers, principals, and schools. Kindergarten teachers in schools with at least a first grade are also surveyed. NTPS utilizes core content and a series of rotating modules to allow timely collection of important education trends as well as trend analysis. Topics covered include characteristics of teachers, principals, schools, teacher training opportunities, retention, retirement, hiring, and shortages.
The NTPS 2019-20 preliminary activities were approved in July 2019, with a change request approved in November 2019 (OMB# 1850-0598 v.26-27). OMB approved the main study for 2020-21 in March 2020 (OMB# 1850-0598 v.28-30). In December 2019, NCES received OMB approval (OMB#1850-0803 v. 259) for cognitive interviews to test new and revised items about virtual schools and online course offerings in the NTPS School Questionnaire. Questions about virtual schools and online course offerings were revised, based on the results of this cognitive testing. This testing occurred in the winter and spring of 2020. During the end of this testing window, in March 2020, it became clear that questions needed to distinguish between typical practices (the intent of these questions) and changes implemented by schools due to the coronavirus (COVID-19). Questions on virtual schools and online course offerings were added to all NTPS questionnaires (OMB# 1850-0598 v.31). This request makes minor corrections to the questionnaire items related to COVID-19. In addition, data collection procedures were simplified (including the postponement of a planned experiment involving a non-monetary incentive of shared food) under the assumption that schools may be open to school staff later in the 2020-21 school year than otherwise planned due to COVID-19, or that schools may be adapting to new logistics. The revisions made to the last approved NTPS 2020-21 clearance documents (OMB# 1850-0598 v.31) are reflected below. Black font demarks the text that remains unchanged from the last approved, while text in red font shows the revisions that were made.
Principal Questionnaire
1-5 (Public and Private) PRIOR to this school year, how many years did you serve as the principal of THIS school? (Appendix B, p.54 & p.70; Part C, p.6)
Do NOT include any years you served as ASSISTANT principal.
Count part of a year as 1 year.
Write
’0’ if this is your first year serving as principal of
at
THIS school.
3-1
(Public and Private) Did the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic affect how instruction was delivered in
this school during the 2019-20 school year? (Appendix B, p.57 &
p.73; Part C, p. 11)
Yes
No -> GO TO item 3-3 below
3-2
(Public and Private) To what extent do you agree or disagree with the
following statement: I had the support and resources I needed to be
effective as the principal of this school during the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic in the 2019-20 school year? (Appendix B,
p.57 & p.73; Part C, p. 11)
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
I was not the principal at this school during the 2019-20 school year
3-3 (Public and Private) If you did not work at this school during the 2019-20 school year, you may consult staff who worked at the school during that time for assistance with the questions in this section, as needed.
BEFORE
the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic in the 2019-20 school year, did this
school assign a computer or digital device to each student? (Appendix
B, p.57 & p.73; Part C, p.11)
Yes, for use at school only
Yes, that students were allowed to take home
No, we did not distribute any computers or digital devices to any students to take home
3-4
(Public and Private) During the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic in the 2019-20 school year, did you
distribute computers or digital devices to students to take home?
(Appendix B, p.57 & p.73; Part C, p.11)
Yes, we distributed computers or digital devices to all students to take home
Yes, we distributed computers or digital devices to students who did not have access to one at home
No, we did not distribute any computers or digital devices to any students to take home
3-5
(Public and Private) During the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic in the 2019-20
school year, how did this school help students who had no internet
access at home? (Appendix B, p. 57 & p.73; Part C, p.11)
All of the students at this school already had internet access at home
We worked with internet providers to help students access the internet at home
We sent home hotspots or other devices to help students access the internet at home
We
offered spaces where students could safely access free Wi-Fi internet
(in the school parking lot, parked school buses with hot
spots hotspots,
etc.)
We
did not take any steps to help students access the internet because
of COVID-19
Other please specify
School Questionnaire
1-12
(Public and Private) During the 2019-20 school year, how did COVID-19
the coronavirus pandemic
affect instruction in this school?
(Appendix B, p. 89 & 116; Part C, pp.22-23 & 46-47)
There
was no change in how classes were taught because of the COVID-19
the coronavirus pandemic
– GO
TO item 1-13 below
All or some of the classes normally taught in person at the school were canceled
All or some of the classes normally taught in person moved to a distance-learning format using online resources, either self-paced or real-time
All or some of the classes normally taught in person moved into a distance-learning format using paper materials home with students
All or some of the classes normally taught in person changed in some other way- Please specify
1-13.
For classes that were moved into a distance-learning format, was
there any real-time interaction between the teachers and students,
such as live video conferences? (Appendix B, p. 89 & 116)
Yes
No
Not
applicable, no classes were moved into a distance-learning format
Teacher Questionnaire
7-1
(Public and Private) During the 2019-20 school year, how did COVID-19
the coronavirus pandemic affect how you delivered instruction
in this school? (Appendix B, p. 164 & 206; Part C, p. 96)
I was not a teacher at this school during the 2019-20 school year – GO TO item 7-5 on page 29
There
was no change in how my classes were taught because of COVID-19
the coronavirus pandemic
All or some of my classes normally taught in person at the school were canceled
All or some of my classes normally taught in person moved to a distance-learning format using online resources, either self-paced or real-time
All or some of my classes normally taught in person moved to a distance-learning format using paper materials sent home with students
All or some of my classes normally taught in person changed in some other way- Please specify
7-3
(Public and Private) During the COVID-19
coronavirus pandemic in the 2019-20 school year, what kinds of
real-time interactions, if any, did you have with your students at
this school? (Appendix B, p. 164 & 206; Part C, p. 96)
I
had no real-time interactions with students during the coronavirus
COVID-19
pandemic in the 2019-20 school year –
GO TO item 7-5 on page 29
I taught scheduled real-time lessons to classes who could ask questions during the lesson through a video or audio call
I held scheduled sessions with groups of students to provide support through a video or audio call
I held scheduled one-on-one sessions with individual students to teach lessons or provide support through a video or audio call
I held scheduled office hours where students could ask questions through a video or audio call
I had unscheduled sessions with students as needed through a video or audio call
7-4
(Public and Private) What percentage of your students at
this school did you have any real-time interaction with during
the coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic in the 2019-20 school year? (Appendix B, p. 164 &
206; Part C, p. 96)
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
6-4
(Private) During this school year, do you or will you do the
following for this school or district —
(Appendix B, p.205)
6-4e
(Private) Serve on a schoolwide or
districtwide committee
or task force? (Appendix B, p.205)
7-7n
(Private) State or district
content standards have had a positive influence on my
satisfaction with teaching. (Appendix B, p.208)
8-15a
(Private) Does your school, district,
or school system offer tenure? (Appendix B, p.214)
In order to support the changes chronicled in Part B.2 (Procedures for the Collection of Information), some of the framing text was edited for clarity. (Part B, p.9)
Section
B.2.1 describes the operations
operation for the already approved preliminary field
activities for NTPS 2020-21, with Section B.2.1.1 describing special
districts operation and Section
B.2.1.2 the school pre-contact letter operation (OMB# 1850-0598 v.
26).. Section
B.2.2 describes school-level data collection procedures for
the school-level questionnaires (i.e., Teacher Listing Form, School
Questionnaire, and Principal Questionnaire), with Section B.2.2.1
describing the procedures to be used for schools with acceptable
vendor data and Section B.2.2.2 for schools without acceptable vendor
data. Section B.2.3 describes data
collection procedures for the Teacher Questionnaire.
The data collection plan previously included a pre-contact letter to sample schools in the early summer of 2020. No action is requested in this letter; it primarily serves to identify addresses that may be inaccurate. Since staff may not be physically working at schools, and because this letter is a relatively lower priority than other, actionable, NTPS mailings, it is proposed for removal in this change request. In addition to the text change below, the data collection flow chart in Part B, p.14 was updated. Pre-Contact letters previously included in Appendix A were removed. (See pp.15-16 of this memo for the full text of these now-deleted letters.)
B.2.1.2
School Pre-Contact Letters
The
school pre-contact letter is to verify school mailing addresses and
to inform schools about the upcoming data collection. A letter is
sent to each sampled school informing them of their selection for the
study. About 1% of all school addresses get corrected by the U.S.
Post Office in response to the pre-contact letter, saving time and
effort during the actual data collection period.
Previously, the data collection path was divided by whether or not reliable vendor data was available for a sampled school. Schools without vendor data followed a different path in order to prioritize schools for which teacher lists would only be available if a school completed the Teacher Listing Form directly, rather than editing vendor data or using vendor data as a last-resort teacher list. However, because schools may open later in the fall than otherwise planned or be less inclined to prioritize data collection at the start of the school year, these two data collection paths were consolidated. In addition to the updated flow chart in Part B, the following other changes were made to the text:
B.2.2 School-level Data Collection Procedures
School-level
data collection procedures for NTPS 2020-21 are summarized in Exhibit
1 (p. 15
14).
In July 2020, all schools will receive an advance letter addressed to the principal at the school address. The letter includes instructions for completing a brief screener interview online using the NTPS Screener internet instrument. Around the same time, principals for whom we have an email address will also be invited to complete the screener interview via email. The purpose of the screener interview is to determine the school’s eligibility for the NTPS and establish a survey coordinator. The survey coordinator will be asked to facilitate the completion of NTPS questionnaires within their school, and materials will be mailed to him or her throughout data collection. A reminder email will be sent to non-responding school principals in early August 2020. Principals who do not self-screen will be contacted by telephone in mid to late August 2020.
After the advance letter and screener interview, the data collection path – specifically, the timing and level of effort put forth to collecting a TLF from the school, which is needed to draw a sample for the Teacher Questionnaire – for each school will depend on a number of predetermined criterion. The data collection methodology employed will depend primarily on whether the school has acceptable teacher roster data available from the vendor. Schools without acceptable vendor data available do not have the vendor provided teacher roster to fall back on for the purposes of selecting a teacher sample, therefore it is important to put forth additional targeted effort and resources to obtaining a TLF from these schools.
Secondary
data collection pathing will be made based upon the completion status
and timing (if completed) of the school’s screener interview.
Finally, Additionally,
data collection pathing may be made based on a school’s
“priority status”. Prior to the start of NTPS 2020-21
data collection, a propensity model will be run to identify
“priority” schools. The propensity model is based on a
model developed for the NTPS 2015-16 and 2017-18 data collections.
These “priority” schools have characteristics of schools
from which it has been historically difficult to collect data and
which have a potentially high impact on weighting. The priority flag
takes into account both the response propensity and the base weight
of a school to create a measure of a school’s potential effect
on nonresponse weighting adjustments and final estimates. Schools
with either an extremely high weight or an extremely low response
propensity have a large response influence, meaning their nonresponse
will disproportionately affect the nonresponse adjustment cell in
which they are located. Thus, additional efforts are sometimes made
to target data collection operations in these school early during
data collection.
In
September, all schools regardless of
data collection path will
receive an initial school package addressed to the survey coordinator
at the school address. If a survey coordinator was not established
during the screener interview, the package will be addressed to the
principal at the school address. The package will contain a letter to
the survey coordinator or principal, and three individually sealed
envelopes that contain login information for completing the TLF,
Principal Questionnaire, and School Questionnaire. Principals and
survey coordinators will also be contacted by email around the same
time the initial packages are mailed to the sampled schools. The
emails will contain the appropriate hyperlinks and User IDs to
complete the NTPS questionnaires online.
The
timing
method of the mailout of this initial package will depend on
whether the school has acceptable vendor data available,
in combination with the priority status of the school. and,
for those schools without vendor data available, the timing of the
school’s completion of the screener to establish a survey
coordinator. For all schools WITHOUT vendor data or
if they are a priority school, and
schools WITH vendor data who self-screened and established survey
coordinator early (prior to the screener telephone operation),
their this
initial package will be mailed in
early September via FedEX.
These schools will be referred to as
“early schools” throughout the remainder of this package.
For the remaining schools WITH vendor data who
did not self-screen early (late screeners or non-screeners),
the initial package will be mailed approximately
two weeks later via USPS. These
schools will be referred to as “late schools” throughout
the remainder of this package.
Following
the initial mailout, all schools WITHOUT vendor data and ALL
“priority schools” WITH
vendor data will receive
a telephone call from an interviewer whose goal is to alert the
principal or coordinator that a package has been mailed, confirm the
school’s receipt of the package, and answer any questions from
the school. Non-priority schools with
acceptable vendor data will not be included in this telephone
operation.
About
a month three
weeks after the initial
mailout, a second package will be mailed to nonresponding schools.
The package will include a reminder letter to the survey coordinator
or principal and replacement materials for completing the outstanding
questionnaires online. Principal and survey coordinator email
addresses will be used as means of reminding nonresponding school
staff to complete their questionnaires.
B.2.2.1 Schools without Vendor Data Available
Following
the second mailout, schools without vendor data available will
receive a personal visit from a Census
Bureau Field Representative (FR), with the main goal of obtaining a
completed TLF from the school. The FR will also distribute sealed
letters containing login information for the school and principal
questionnaires, as needed. If the FR notes that the school has shown
reluctance or initially refused to participate in the study, the
Regional Office of the FR will send out a “letter of better
understanding” to help encourage participation. This operation
will take place from late October through Thanksgiving.
be included in a telephone follow-up operation. The main goal of this
operation will be to follow-up with survey coordinators and
principals on the status of their TLF. Telephone interviewers will
also check on the status of the PQ and SQ. This operation will take
place in mid-November.
Schools for which the personal visit is unsuccessful will receive a third reminder package in early January. This package will be mailed to the principal at the school address and will include a reminder letter, paper versions of the TLF, principal and/or school questionnaire(s), and postage-paid addressed return envelopes. Principal and survey coordinator email addresses will be used as means of reminding nonresponding schools to complete their questionnaires.
Beginning in late January, schools that have not yet completed their TLF, principal, and/or school questionnaire(s) will be sent to a telephone reminder operation aimed at reminding the survey coordinator or school principal to complete their questionnaires. Data collection for the TLF concludes following this telephone operation. If outstanding school and/or principal questionnaire(s) remain after this final mailing, one more attempt by mail (fourth and final school package), email, and telephone will be made to remind the school to complete their outstanding questionnaire(s).
B.2.2.2 Schools with Vendor Data Available
Following
the second mailout, schools with vendor data available will receive a
third reminder package in early November. This package will be mailed
to the principal at the school address and will include a reminder
letter, paper versions of the TLF and principal and/or school
questionnaire(s) as needed, and postage-paid addressed return
envelopes. Principal and survey coordinator email addresses will be
used as means of reminding nonresponding schools to complete their
questionnaires. Note that, while the timing of the initial
and second third school
packages varies by
early versus late schools down this
path acceptable
vendor data, the mailout schedule for the two groups converges
starting with
after the third mailout.
Beginning in early December, schools that have not yet completed their TLF will be sent to a telephone reminder operation aimed at reminding the survey coordinator or school principal to complete their TLF and other outstanding school-level questionnaire(s). In early January, schools that have not provided or verified their TLF will have their teachers sampled from the vendor provided list of teachers. Beginning in late January, schools that have not yet completed their school and/or principal questionnaires will be sent to a telephone reminder operation aimed at reminding the survey coordinator or school principal to complete their questionnaires. If outstanding school-level forms remain after the telephone reminder operation, one more attempt by mail (fourth and final school package), email, telephone, and personal visit will be made to remind the school to complete their outstanding questionnaire(s). [Part B, p.11-13]
In
addition, mail method (USPS versus FedEx) for the initial school
package will be based upon school characteristic and screener
outcome. As a reminder, “early schools” are those schools
with no vendor data available and schools WITH vendor data available
that self-screened early and established a coordinator. “Late
schools” are those schools WITH vendor data that did not
self-screen early (late screeners or non-screeners). All schools with
no vendor data available (Early) and Late
acceptable vendor data at that school. Non-priority schools with no
vendor data available and all priority schools will be mailed
via FedEx. Both of these categories of schools are the harder to
reach or less likely to respond schools and, therefore, additional
resources will be expended for the initial packages to stand out to
school staff. All non-priority schools
WITH vendor data available that self-screened and have a coordinator
(Early)
will be mailed via USPS; these schools are eager and likely to
respond and, therefore, additional resources will not be expended to
make the initial packages stand out. [Part B, p.23]
10. Telephone
and field follow-up operations for late-sampled teachers. NTPS
2017-18 included two additional follow-up operations aimed at
collecting completed questionnaires from nonresponding teachers
sampled in the later data collection waves (17-20). In previous NTPS
and SASS cycles, late-sampled teachers were not eligible for
inclusion in telephone follow-up and/or field follow-up operations.
During the phase 2 telephone follow-up operation for the NTPS
2017-18, telephone center staff made telephone calls to late-sampled
teachers to remind them to complete their questionnaire and, whenever
possible, collect the interview over the phone. During the phase 4
field operation, Field Representatives made personal visits to the
schools to drop off the paper form(s) and schedule a time to pick up
the completed forms. Additionally, both of these operations targeted
domains with publishability risks (e.g. teachers in city and charter
schools). The NTPS 2020-21 includes a planned Phase 2 Telephone
Follow-up Operation for which most late sampled teachers will be
eligible and a Phase 23
Field Follow-up Operation to ensure that all sampled teachers receive
non-response follow-up by at least telephone or Field (or possibly
both). [Part B, p.25]
A school-level experiment was planned for the screener mailing, for which some public schools were randomly assigned to receive a data product. Due to concerns that schools may not have in-person staff present at school mailing addresses to open this mailing and the effect of this product on response rates would be difficult to measure due to school logistics, this experiment was removed.
In
addition, a randomized experiment in NTPS 2020-21 will compare the
effects of including a data product (a colorful data wheel that
displays state-level NTPS data from the 2017-18 collection) in the
Screener letters to public schools, at which time the principal is
invited to complete the Screener online using the Screener internet
instrument.
The
Screener mail-out will include the cross between the data product
experiment and the letter wording experiment, resulting in a
randomized four-way panel design. Half of the traditional Screener
letter mail-out will include the data product and half of the
modified Screener letter mail-outs will include the data product.
Each treatment group will include 2,650 schools and a statistically
significant difference will be determined between any two treatments
groups if the treatment groups’ response rates differ by 4.99%.
[previously part B, p. 34, at the end of section B.4.2.1.2]
The data collection plan previously included a non-monetary incentive experiment for schools, in which schools were to be sent branded tins with food to be shared amongst school staff. Due to concerns that September of 2020 may not be an appropriate time to evaluate the effectiveness of shared food (for example, schools may be closed to most or all staff, or staff may be reluctant to share even wrapped food due to concerns about COVID-19), this experiment was postponed and will be evaluated in a future NTPS collection. Descriptions of the experiment and how it interacted with other planned experiments have been removed from parts A and B. In Appendix A, the proposed tin design was removed from Appendix A, as was Version 3 of the Initial School Mailout Letter, a variation that existed solely for schools that would receive this non-monetary incentive. (The full text of one the Version 3 Letter is seen on page 10 of this memo.)
The
NTPS 2020-21 will include an experiment for a subsample of public
schools designed to examine the effectiveness of offering a
non-monetary incentive to schools to boost overall NTPS response
within the school. Schools assigned to the experimental treatment
will receive a non-monetary incentive with the initial mailout
package. This treatment will be evaluated against the control group,
which will not receive any school-level incentive.
[part A, p.11]
Further
details about the use of incentives and the contingency plan are
provided in sections B.2.3,
and B.3.2,
and B.4.2. of Supporting
Statement Part B. [part A, p.12]
B.4.2.1 Testing at the School-level
Three
Four
experiments
aimed at increasing school-level response rates are planned for the
2020-21 NTPS, namely (1)
testing non-monetary incentives,
(21)
testing new package contents, (32)
testing prepopulated TLFs, and (
4
3)
testing various question layouts on the school questionnaire internet
instruments. Each of these experiments is described briefly below.
Following data collection, each experiment will be evaluated using a series of metrics calculated for the control group and each treatment group of the experiment separately. These metrics will include, but not be limited to:
Response rate;
Average number of contacts;
Days to respond;
Data collection costs.
The response rates will be calculated for each treatment group and selected demographic domains and compared using significance tests for differences. To account for confounding variables, a model-based approach will also be calculated to determine what effect the experimental treatment had on a case’s likelihood to response, given that case’s unique characteristics.
The average number of contacts and average days to respond across the experimental groups will be used as a proxy for timeliness of response. A reduction in the average number of contacts could be used to justify the use of a particular treatment. For example, if cases within the experimental group using non-monetary incentives respond in a more timely fashion, which could reduce the number of cases included in follow-up operations, allowing finite resources, such as field, to be spread across fewer cases.
Using data collection costs associated with each mailout, any additional costs associated with a particular treatment group, and estimates for interviewer costs, an average cost-per-case can be determined within each experimental group. A reduction in cost-per-case could justify the use of a particular treatment to reduce the overall survey cost. Particular treatments may lead to more initial costs, such as the use of incentives, but if cases within a particular treatment group respond in a fewer number of contacts – specifically more costly contacts such as personal visits – this could lead to a reduction in overall cost at the end of data collection.
Testing
non-monetary incentives at the school level (1S). The
NTPS 2020-21 will include an experiment for a subsample of public
and private schools designed to examine the effectiveness of
offering a non-monetary incentive to schools to boost overall NTPS
response within the school. Schools assigned to the experimental
treatment will receive a non-monetary incentive with the initial
mailout package. This package will be addressed to the survey
coordinator at the school address. If a survey coordinator was not
established during the screener interview, the package will be
addressed to the principal at the school address. The package will
contain the non-monetary incentive, along with a letter to the
survey coordinator or principal, and three individually sealed
envelopes that contain login information for completing the TLF,
Principal Questionnaire, and School Questionnaire. The critical
features of the non-monetary incentive item are that the item is:
(1) sharable amongst school staff, (2) raise awareness about the
survey within the school, leading to conversations about the NTPS
among school staff, and (3) customizable, in that the item can be
NTPS or education-branded and possibly include select national-level
data points from previous cycles of the survey.
The
details of the non-monetary incentive are still being worked out and
are pending the acquisition process and the receipt of prototypes,
however, the current plan is to send large (6.5 gallon), sealed metal
tins of individually-wrapped candy to schools in the non-monetary
incentive treatment group. The tin design will be wrapped around the
tin so that it is clearly visible to school staff (rather than
printed only on the lid). This design is included in Appendix A (p.
109).
The
minimal detectable difference in response rate between the control
group and the treatment group that would be necessary to determine a
statistically significant effect associated with the treatment, was
calculated as follows:
where
Z1-α
= 1.96 for a 95-percent confidence-level, per NCES standards
Zβ
= .845 for a standard power-level of .8
σ1
and
σ2
are
maximized to .5, to provide the most conservative estimate
n1
and n2
are the sample sizes for the control and treatment groups
D
= 1.68, the design effect observed in the recent administrations of
NTPS
Given
that the treatment group will include 1,000 public schools and 250
private schools, a statistically significant difference will be
determined if the control and treatment group’s response rates
differ by 6.41% and 12.80% for public and private schools,
respectively.
The
average number of contacts and average days to respond across the
experimental groups will be used as a proxy for timeliness of
response. A reduction in the average number of contacts could be used
to justify the use of a particular treatment. For example, if cases
within the experimental group using non-monetary
incentives new mailed package
contents respond in a more timely fashion, which could reduce
the number of cases included in follow-up operations, allowing finite
resources, such as field, to be spread across fewer cases. [part B,
p.32]
Schools
sampled for NTPS 2020-21 that receive the school non-monetary
incentive are ineligible for this experiment on package contents.
[footnote, Part B, p.33]
A
subset of the NTPS 2020-21 schools with acceptable vendor data will
be offered their prepopulated TLF via the portal, while the remaining
schools with acceptable vendor data will only be offered the
traditional Excel upload and manual entry options. This
test will only be conducted on the schools not already designated to
receive the non-monetary incentive.
[part B, p.33]
All
teachers within the same school will receive the same incentive
treatment; there will not be “mixed schools” where some
teachers receive the prepaid cash monetary incentive while others
receive the non-monetary tote bag incentive,
and teachers in both schools that received the non-monetary
school-level incentive and schools that did not receive this
incentive will be eligible to receive a teacher incentive.
[part B, p.36]
NTPS-11.3LP
– Base principal letter modified to reflect the inclusion of
the non-monetary incentive (candy tin) (1S; p. 34 of Part B).
[Appendix A, p.31 – the School and Teacher
Letters and E-mails Summary Table]
NTPS-11.3LC
– Base coordinator letter modified to reflect the inclusion of
the non-monetary incentive (candy tin) (1S; p. 34 of Part B).
[Appendix A, p.31 – the School and Teacher Letters and
E-mails Summary Table]
Initial
School Mailout Letter to Coordinator or Principal – Version 3
NTPS-11.3LP//11.3LC
(P
= Principal letter; C = Coordinator letter) (Includes School Mailout
FAQs)
<Date>
<Principal
or Coordinator Name>
<School
Name>
<Mailing
Address>
<City,
State ZIP Code>
Dear
<Principal
or Coordinator Name>,
Your
school has been selected to participate in the 2020–21 National
Teacher and Principal Survey
(NTPS). [C: The principal at your school has identified you as the
survey coordinator for your school.] Your school’s
participation is important for the success of this survey. Each
response is vital to ensure reliable, nationally representative data,
and we need your help to make this happen. We have included a tin of
candy for you to share with your school’s staff to show our
appreciation for your school’s participation in the NTPS.
The
NTPS is a nationwide sample survey of elementary and secondary
schools and the principals and teachers who staff them. The survey is
a primary source of information about what is happening in K–12
schools across the United States. The survey is administered by the
U.S. Census Bureau on behalf of the National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES), the statistical agency within the U.S. Department
of Education.
[C:
As
survey coordinator, we//P:
We]
request your assistance with the following tasks:
Complete,
or ensure the online completion of, the Teacher Listing Form (TLF)
using the enclosure labeled “Instructions
for completing the Teacher Listing Form.”
You
can complete the TLF or give it to the staff member who can best
provide information about the teachers at your school, including each
teacher’s name, e-mail address, and subject matter taught.
Complete,
or ensure the online completion of, the School Questionnaire using
the enclosure labeled “Instructions
for completing the School Questionnaire.”
You
can complete the School Questionnaire or give it to the staff member
who can best answer questions about enrollment, staffing, and
programs and services offered at your school.
[C:
Give
the enclosure labeled “Instructions for completing the
Principal Questionnaire” to the principal or administrator at
your school. //P:
Use
the enclosure labeled “Instructions for completing the
Principal Questionnaire” to go online and complete the
Principal Questionnaire within two weeks.]
Please
ensure that the Teacher Listing Form, School Questionnaire, and
Principal Questionnaire are completed within two weeks. Thank
you in advance for your help to ensure your school is represented in
this important survey.
Sincerely,
James
L. Woodworth, Ph.D.
Commissioner
National
Center
for
Education
Statistics (NCES)
U.S.
Department
of
Education
NCES
is authorized to conduct this survey by the Education Sciences Reform
Act of 2002 (ESRA 2002, 20 U.S.C. §9543). All of the information
you provide may be used only for statistical purposes and may not be
disclosed, or used, in identifiable form for any other purpose except
as required by law (20 U.S.C. §9573 and 6 U.S.C. §151). Reports
of the findings from the survey will not identify participating
districts, schools, or staff. Individual responses will be combined
with those from other participants to produce summary statistics and
reports.
(Design
on Non-Monetary Incentive (Candy Tin)
In the process of making the changes to Part A described above, other small errors in Part A were discovered and corrected. Further, the citations of recent First Look reports that use NTPS data were reflected to include the release of the results of the 2017-18 NTPS Teacher collection. These changes are collected below:
NTPS
builds upon and extends the series of SASS data collections that
occurred seven times over the period between 1987 and 2012. Many
questions from SASS continue to be asked in the NTPS questionnaires,
allowing researchers to examine trends on these topics over time. In
addition, the linkages of NTPS/SASS with TFS and PFS create a small
longitudinal component. A subset of teachers who respond to NTPS are
surveyed during the following school year, as part of TFS, including
teachers who changed schools, left the teaching profession, and
teachers who stayed at the same school over the two school years. TFS
allows researchers to study the antecedents of teacher attrition. TFS
was most recently conducted in 2012-13 and will be conducted again in
2021-21
22,
following the 2020-21 NTPS. [Part A, pp. 7-8]
The
results of each NTPS collection are used to create First Look reports
that are released to the public on the NCES website and which
introduce new data from each NTPS collection through statistical
tables containing descriptive information. The selected findings
chosen for these reports demonstrate the range of information
available on the NTPS restricted use data files. The most recent
First Look reports available for the NTPS are as follows:
Characteristics
of Public Elementary and Secondary Schools in the United States:
Results From the 2017-18 National Teacher and Principal Survey First
Look (NCES 2019-140); Characteristics of Public Elementary and
Secondary School Principals in the United States: Results From the
2017-18 National Teacher and Principal Survey First Look (NCES
2019-141); and Characteristics of Public and
Private Elementary
and Secondary School Teachers in the United States: Results From the
2015-16
2017-18 National
Teacher and Principal Survey First Look (NCES 2017-072
2020-142).
[Part
A, p. 8]
Due
to the favorable results from the teacher incentives for the NTPS
2017-18, the NTPS 2020-21 will include the use of incentives, once
again, with the goal of maximizing overall teacher response. Two
types of incentives will be offered in an experimental manner –
a prepaid cash monetary incentive and a non-monetary incentive.
Teachers in the experimental treatment will receive a canvas tote bag
at the first contact by mail. The tote bag will be NTPS or
education-branded
and.
The treatment will be further separated into two groups – one
where each of the teachers and the survey coordinator receive a tote
bag, and the other where only each of the teachers receives a tote
bag. The thought is that, since the survey coordinator is tasked with
distributing the teacher packages, (s)he may benefit from receiving
the item, as well, given that it is going to be apparent that there
is something other than a letter in each envelope. The treatments
will be evaluated against one another and the control group, which
will not receive any incentive. [part A, p.11]
Several pieces of communication in Appendix A were updated to (1) remove mention of the non-monetary incentive for schools and (2) acknowledge challenges that schools may be facing related to COVID-19:
Screener Letter- Version 1 (Appendix A, p.42)
The
NTPS is a nationwide sample survey of the teaching and working
conditions in schools across the United States, as well as
characteristics of the teachers and principals who staff them. The
NTPS will provide critical data to policymakers and researchers on
school organization, decision-making, teacher recruitment, and other
important education topics.
These are unprecedented times, and we are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools. We understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your school’s plans to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students during the upcoming school year. We hope you will still find time to participate, as the NTPS will provide critical data to policymakers and researchers on school organization, decision-making, teacher recruitment, and other important education topics, including how COVID-19 impacted schools, school staff, and the delivery of instruction to students last spring.
Screener Letter- Version 1 (Appendix A, p.43)
This
is your school’s opportunity to inform education policies.
These are unprecedented times, and we are aware
of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools. We understand that you may
be facing challenges in adjusting your school’s plans to
deliver meaningful learning experiences to students during the
upcoming school year. We hope you will still find time to
participate, as this is your school’s opportunity to inform
education policies and provide information on the impact of COVID-19
on your school, school staff, and the delivery of instruction to
students last spring.
Screener Email- Version 1 (Appendix A, p.45)
The
NTPS is a nationwide sample survey of the teaching and working
conditions in schools across the United States, as well as
characteristics of the teachers and principals who staff them.
TheThese
are unprecedented times, and we are aware of the strain COVID-19 has
put on schools. We understand that you may be facing challenges in
adjusting your school’s plans to deliver meaningful learning
experiences to students during the upcoming school year. We hope you
will still find time to participate, as the NTPS will provide
critical data to policymakers and researchers on school organization,
decision-making, teacher recruitment, and other important education
topics, including the delivery of instructions
to students last spring.
Screener Email- Version 1 (Appendix A, p.46)
This
is your school’s opportunity to inform education policies.
These are unprecedented times, and we are aware of the strain
COVID-19 has put on schools. We understand that you may be facing
challenges in adjusting your school’s plans to deliver
meaningful learning experiences to students during the upcoming
school year. We hope you will still find time to participate, as this
is your school’s opportunity to inform education policies and
provide information on the impact of COVID-19 on your school, school
staff, and the delivery of instruction to students last spring.
Screener Reminder Email (Appendix A, p.47)
The NTPS is a nationwide sample survey of the teaching and working conditions in schools across the United States, as well as characteristics of the teachers and principals who staff them. This is your school’s opportunity to inform education policies. The NTPS will provide critical data to policymakers and researchers on school organization, decision-making, teacher recruitment, and other important education topics, including the delivery of instruction to students during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Initial School Mailout Letter to Coordinator or Principal- Version 1 (Appendix A, p.48)
The NTPS is a nationwide sample survey of elementary and secondary schools and the principals and teachers who staff them. We are aware of the strain that COVID-19 has put on schools. The survey is a primary source of information about what is happening in K–12 schools across the United States, and we have added questions to address how the pandemic has impacted instruction. The survey is administered by the U.S. Census Bureau on behalf of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), the statistical agency within the U.S. Department of Education.
Initial School Mailout Letter to Coordinator or Principal- Version 2 (Appendix A, p.49)
We understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your day-to-day operations to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students during the COVID-19 pandemic. With your participation, we can provide data on how schools and teachers adjusted their instruction during the pandemic, in addition to the data we regularly provide on the characteristics and conditions of America's schools and the professionals who work in them.
Initial School Mailout Letter- SQ (Appendix A, p. 53)
The
2020–21 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS) is your
school’s opportunity to tell policymakers about your school’s
enrollment, staffing, and
the programs and services offered to your students,
and how your school modified instruction during the beginning of the
COVID-19 pandemic. You have been identified by your [school’s
designated survey coordinator, <Coordinator Name>,/school’s
principal] as the staff member who is most knowledgeable about your
school and can provide the required information on the NTPS School
Questionnaire.
Initial School Mailout Letter- PQ (Appendix A, p.54)
We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools, and we understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your school’s day-to-day operations to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students. The success of this national survey depends on your participation. Only a small percentage of schools and principals are selected to participate. We cannot substitute another school principal for you. With your participation, we can provide national and state-representative data on how schools adjusted their instruction during the current pandemic, in addition to the data we regularly provide on the characteristics and conditions of America's schools and the professionals who work in them.
Initial School Mailout E-mail- SQ (Appendix A, p.56)
Last
week, we sent you a package of materials at your school address
inviting your school’s participation in the National Teacher
and Principal Survey (NTPS). The 2020–21 NTPS is your school’s
opportunity to tell policymakers about your school’s
enrollment, staffing, and
the programs and services offered to your students,
and how your school modified instruction during the beginning of the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Initial School Mailout E-mail- PQ (Appendix A, p.57)
The 2020–21 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS) is your opportunity to tell policymakers about your school and your experiences as a principal. We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools, and we understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your school’s day-to-day operations to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students. The success of this national survey depends on your participation. Only a small percentage of schools and principals are selected to participate. We cannot substitute another school principal for you. With your participation, we can provide national and state-representative data on how schools adjusted their instruction during the current pandemic, in addition to the data we regularly provide on the characteristics and conditions of America's schools and the professionals who work in them.
Initial Teacher Mailout Letter to Survey Coordinator (Appendix A, p.78)
We greatly appreciate your assistance so far with the 2020–21 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS). Now, we need your help to ensure the NTPS Teacher Questionnaire invitations are distributed and the questionnaires are completed in a timely manner. The survey gives teachers an opportunity to tell policymakers about their experiences in the teaching profession. Each selected teacher’s participation is critical to obtain an accurate view of the teaching profession, including teachers’ professional backgrounds, teaching fields, workloads, and working conditions across the country. We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools and teachers, and have added questions to the Teacher Questionnaire to address how the pandemic impacted the delivery of instruction to students.
Initial Teacher Mailout Letter to Survey Coordinator (Appendix A, p.80)
The survey gives teachers an opportunity to tell policymakers about their experiences in the teaching profession. Each selected teacher’s participation is critical to obtain an accurate view of the teaching profession, including teachers’ professional backgrounds, teaching fields, workloads, and working conditions across the country. We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools and teachers, and have added questions to the Teacher Questionnaire to address how the pandemic impacted the delivery of instruction to students.
Initial Teacher Mailout Letter (Appendix A, p.81)
We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools and teachers, and we understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your instruction to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students. As such, we have added questions to address how COVID-19 impacted your teaching during the beginning of the pandemic. The success of this national survey depends on your participation. Only a small percentage of schools and teachers are selected to participate. We cannot substitute another teacher for you. [M: Please accept the enclosed $5 as a token of our appreciation for your participation in the NTPS.//NM: Please accept the enclosed tote bag as a token of our appreciation for your participation in the NTPS.]
Initial Teacher Mailout E-mail (Appendix A, p.82)
This is your opportunity to tell policymakers about your experiences and express your opinions as a teacher in your school. We are aware of the strain COVID-19 has put on schools and teachers, and we understand that you may be facing challenges in adjusting your instruction to deliver meaningful learning experiences to students. As such, we have added questions to address how COVID-19 impacted your teaching during the beginning of the pandemic. The success of this national survey depends on your participation. Only a small percentage of schools and teachers are selected to participate. We cannot substitute another teacher for you. Your responses to the survey questions will not be shared with your school administration.
<Date>
<School
Name>
<Mailing
Address>
<City,
State, ZIP Code>
Dear
Principal:
Your
school has been selected for the 2020-21 National Teacher and
Principal Survey (NTPS). Data from the 2015–16 NTPS show that:
A
majority of public school principals held a master’s degree
(61 percent) as their highest degree, compared to an education
specialist/professional diploma at least one year beyond the
master’s level (27 percent), a doctorate/first professional
degree (10 percent), or a bachelor’s degree or less (2
percent).
Nationwide,
about 21 percent of public schools offered at least one course
entirely online, and among schools offering online courses,
relatively more public charter schools offered all of their classes
online (14 percent) than traditional public schools (5 percent).
On
average, regular full-time teachers in public schools spent 53 hours
per week on all school-related activities. That includes 27 hours
that they were paid to deliver instruction to students during a
typical full week. Public school teachers were required to work an
average of 38 hours per week to receive their base pay.
These
statistics are just a few of the results that the NTPS provides to
help researchers and policymakers learn about our nation’s
schools, principals, and teachers. The NTPS is administered every
other year by the U.S. Census Bureau on behalf of the National Center
for Education Statistics (NCES), the statistical agency within the
U.S. Department of Education, and is the only national survey that
provides this kind of information. All schools and students
ultimately benefit when good data help legislators and administrators
make good decisions. In addition, NTPS data allows you to compare
your school with other schools <in State/across the country>.
The
NTPS has been endorsed by several organizations, including <prominent
local and/or national endorser(s)>. You can find additional
information about NTPS and results from prior NTPS administrations at
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps.
There
is nothing to do right now but we will be in contact with your school
later this summer. We
look forward to your school’s participation in this important
survey.
Sincerely,
James
L. Woodworth, Ph.D.
Commissioner
National
Center
for
Education
Statistics (NCES)
U.S.
Department
of
Education
(
2=Private
schools that are not Amish or Mennonite; 2A = Amish and Mennonite
schools)
<Date>
<School
Name>
<Mailing
Address>
<City,
State, ZIP Code>
Dear
Principal:
Your
school has been selected for the 2020-21 National Teacher and
Principal Survey (NTPS). Data from the Schools and Staffing Survey
(SASS), the predecessor of the NTPS, show that:
More
private school principals held a master’s degree (50 percent)
as their highest degree, compared to those with a bachelor’s
degree or less (31 percent), an education specialist/professional
diploma (10 percent), or a doctorate/first professional degree (10
percent).
Among
private schools, 39 percent overall, 51 percent of city schools, 44
percent of suburban schools, 23 percent of town schools, and 25
percent of rural schools had teachers or staff with specialist or
coaching assignments.
On
average, regular full-time teachers in both public and private
schools spent 52 hours per week on all school-related activities.
That includes 31 hours that they were paid to deliver instruction to
students during a typical full week. Both groups of teachers were
required to work 38 hours per week to receive their base pay.
These
statistics are just a few of the results that the NTPS provides to
help researchers and policymakers learn about our nation’s
schools, principals, and teachers. The NTPS is administered every
other year by the U.S. Census Bureau on behalf of the National Center
for Education Statistics (NCES), the statistical agency within the
U.S. Department of Education, and is the only national survey that
provides this kind of information. All schools and students
ultimately benefit when good data help legislators and administrators
make good decisions. [2: In addition, NTPS data allows you to compare
your school with other schools <in State/across the country>.]
The
NTPS has been endorsed by several organizations, including <prominent
local and/or national endorser(s)>. [2: You can find additional
information about NTPS and results from prior NTPS administrations at
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps.]
There
is nothing to do right now but we will be in contact with your school
later this summer. We
look forward to your school’s participation in this important
survey.
Sincerely,
James
L. Woodworth, Ph.D.
Commissioner
National
Center
for
Education
Statistics (NCES)
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Clarady, Carrie (Contractor) |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-13 |