VS 21-303 Health Management on U.S. Feedlots 2021 Phase II Questio

National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS); Health Management on U.S. Feedlots 2020

FH 2021 VS Form 21-303 Phase 2 Questionnaire

Respondents

OMB: 0579-0079

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
NAHMS ID: _____________________

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0079. The time required
to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time
to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and
review the information collected.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE
VETERINARY SERVICES
NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM
2150 CENTRE AVE, BLDG B
FORT COLLINS, CO 80526

OMB Approved
0579-0079
EXP: 04/2023

HEALTH MANAGEMENT ON
U.S. FEEDLOTS 2021
PHASE 2 QUESTIONNAIRE

Beginning time (military) ..............................................................................................

Time_begin

Ending time (military)………………………………………………………………………

Time_end

State FIPS: FIPS Operation #: Oper_Num Interviewer: Initials Date: Date_Interview
2 digits
4 digits
initials
mm/dd/yy
The information you provide will be used for statistical purposes only. In accordance with the Confidential
Information Protection provisions of Title V, Subtitle A, Public Law 107–347 and other applicable Federal
laws, your responses will be kept confidential and will not be disclosed in identifiable form to anyone
other than employees or agents. By law, every employee and agent has taken an oath and is subject to a
jail term, a fine, or both, if he or she willfully discloses ANY identifiable information about you or your
feedlot. Response is voluntary.

General Instructions
Unless otherwise noted, questions refer to calendar year 2020, from January 1, 2020, to December
31, 2020.
We would like to know about all cattle and calves on feed for the slaughter market, regardless of
ownership, on this particular feedlot.
 Include cattle being fed by you for others.
 Exclude any of your cattle being custom fed in feedlots operated by others.
 Exclude cattle being “backgrounded only” for sale as feeders, for later placement on feed on
another feedlot, or to be returned to pasture.
 Exclude cows and bulls being fed by you for the slaughter market.
If “Don’t Know” is provided as an answer option, it is abbreviated as “DK.”
If “Not Applicable” is provided as an answer option, it is abbreviated as “NA.”
The following 4-point scale is utilized in many questions when possible instead of asking specifically for
percentages. This is done because we recognize that in many cases percentages supplied are
approximations and we would like the response to reflect that.
“None” (0%)
“Some (50% or less)
“Most” (51% or more)
“All” (100%)
If a different scale is used it is specified in the question.
During 2020, the spread of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) led to market effects that impacted the
operation of meatpacking plants and had downstream effects on feedlot operations. These effects were
observed through a number of different sources, including the monthly NASS Cattle on Feed Survey. This
questionnaire was revised to include questions to help further describe the effects of COVID-19 on the
health and management of cattle on feedlots.
VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Section A—Cattle Health and Health Practices
Preconditioning and Backgrounding
1. Preconditioning and backgrounding comprises procedures such as acclimatization to feed
bunks, vaccinations, implants, antibiotic use, weaning, deworming, castration, and dehorning that occur
before cattle arrive at the feedlot. For this question, reliable information about preconditioning and
backgrounding is defined as information that is trusted, but not necessarily documented.
For each of the following arrival weight and breed classes, answer yes or no for whether they were
placed on this feedlot. If yes, for what proportion of these cattle did you have reliable information about
preconditioning/backgrounding they received prior to arrival at this feedlot?
Reliable information?
Weight class and
breed placed on the
feedlot?

a. Beef breed cattle
(less than 400 lb at arrival)

b. Beef breed cattle
(400-699 lb at arrival)

c. Beef breed cattle
(700 lb or greater at arrival)

d. Dairy or dairy cross breed cattle
(less than 400 lb at arrival)

e. Dairy or dairy cross breed cattle
(less than 400-699 lb at arrival)

f. Dairy or dairy cross breed cattle
(700 lb or greater at arrival)

None

Some

Most

All

1 Yes
3 No F101
1 Yes
3 No F102
1 Yes
3 No F103
1 Yes
3 No F104

If No, SKIP to 1b
If Yes  F107

1

2

3

4

If No, SKIP to 1c
If Yes  F108

1

2

3

4

If No, SKIP to 1d
If Yes  F109

1

2

3

4

If No, SKIP to 1e
If Yes  F110

1

2

3

4

1 Yes
3 No F105

If No, SKIP to 1f
If Yes  F111

1

2

3

4

1 Yes
3 No F106

If No, SKIP to 2
If Yes  F112

1

2

3

4

2. In 2020, were all cattle placed on this feedlot bred and raised by this operation?
F113

1 Yes 3 No
8 DK

[If Question 2 = Yes, then SKIP to Question 6]
3. How important is it to have reliable information on the preconditioning and backgrounding that cattle
received prior to arrival? [Choose one only] F114
Moderately
Extremely
Not important
Slightly important
Very important
important
important
1
2
3
4
5
[If Question 3 = Not Important, SKIP to Question 6]
4. Are you able to access all the reliable information that you want about
preconditioning and backgrounding?
F115

1 Yes 3 No

[If Question 4 = Yes, SKIP to Question 6]
5. Why can’t you access the reliable information that you want?
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

Finding cattle to purchase for which this information is known is inconvenient. F116
Cattle are purchased at a sale barn where this information is not available. F117
Cattle for which this information is known are too expensive. F118
There is no practical mechanism for transfer of this information. F119
Other (specify:__________F120_Other____________________________) F120

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
2

NAHMS ID: _____________________

6. When you were aware of the history of cattle you purchased, or in calves you raised yourself, what
proportion of the cattle had the following preconditioning and backgrounding procedures performed
before arriving at the feedlot?
None

Some

Most

All

DK

a. Introduction to the feed bunk F121

1

2

3

4

8

b. Given respiratory vaccines less than 2 weeks prior to or at
weaning? F122
c. Given respiratory vaccines more than 2 weeks prior to weaning?

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

d. Given modified live, not killed, respiratory vaccines? F124

1

2

3

4

8

e. Weaned 4-6 weeks before arrival at feedlot? F125

1

2

3

4

8

f. Weaned more than 6 weeks before arrival at feedlot? F126

1

2

3

4

8

g. Bull calves and/or bulls castrated at least 3 weeks prior to arrival
at feedlot ? F127
h. Non-polled cattle dehorned at least 3 weeks prior to arrival at
feedlot? F128
5 Check if all cattle placed were naturally polled

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

i. Treated for external or internal parasites? F129

1

2

3

4

8

j. Given antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to arrival at feedlot? F130

1

2

3

4

8

F123

Initial Processing and Management at the Feedlot
7. Were cattle assessed for their risk for bovine respiratory disease when they arrived at
this feedlot and initial processing protocols modified based on this assessment? F131

1 Yes 3 No

[If Question 7 = No, SKIP to Question 9]
8. How important were the following factors when making this risk assessment?
Not
Important

Slightly
Important

Moderately
Important

Very
Important

Extremely
Important

a. Long shipping distance F132

1

2

3

4

5

b. Arrival weight class F133

1

2

3

4

5

c. Appearance of cattle at arrival F134
d. Respiratory disease in cattle previously received
from same source F135
e. Presence of respiratory disease in some cattle
in group F136
f. Whether cattle were commingled with other
cattle prior to arrival F137
g. Geographic origin of the cattle F138

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

h. Lack of previous respiratory vaccination F139

1

2

3

4

5

i. Lack of preconditioning/backgrounding F140

1

2

3

4

5

j. Season of the year F141

1

2

3

4

5

k. Weather at time of arrival at the feedlot F142

1

2

3

4

5

l. Experience of receiving crew F143
m. Breed of cattle F144
n. History of prior antibiotic treatment F145

1
1
1

2
2
2

3
3
3

4
4
4

5
5
5

o. Other (specify:__ F146_Other________) F146

1

2

3

4

5

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

3

NAHMS ID: _____________________

9. Processing includes procedures such as vaccinations, tagging, implants,
deworming, mineral or vitamin supplementation, castration, dehorning, and antibiotic
administrations.

1 None
2 Some
3 Most
4 All

Excluding cattle processed individually for treating illness, what proportion of cattle
were processed as a group at, or within 4 weeks, of placement? F147

a. Was the proportion of cattle processed as a group in calendar year 2020 different
1 Yes
than the proportion of cattle processed as a group in calendar year 2019 due to COVID- 3 No
19 or its effects? F847
8 DK
[If Question 9a = No or DK, SKIP to Question 10]



b. Was the proportion of cattle processed as a group in calendar year 2020 more or
less compared to the proportion of cattle processed as a group in calendar year 2019
due to COVID-19 or its effects? F848

1 More than 2019
3 Less than 2019

[If Question 9 = None, then SKIP to Question 15]
10. What proportion of cattle that were initially processed as a group (Question 9) were initially processed
during the following time periods?
None

Some

Most

All

DK

a. Less than 1 day after arrival F148

1

2

3

4

8

b. 1 to 3 day(s) after arrival F149

1

2

3

4

8

c. 4 to 13 days after arrival F150
d. 14 to 28 days after arrival F151

1
1

2
2

3
3

4
4

8
8

11. When cattle were initially processed as a group at placement, what proportion of the cattle initially
processed as a group (Question 9) had the following procedures performed? Select none, some, most, all,
or DK for “don’t know”. Answer for all cattle of all weight classes at arrival.
[Refer to Reference Card 2 (Vaccine Examples) for examples of common trade names of vaccines. For
combination products, enter information into all relevant rows]
None

Some

Most

All

DK

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

c. Vaccination against tetanus? F155

1

2

3

4

8

d. Vaccination against Moraxella (pinkeye)? F156

1

2

3

4

8

e. Vaccination against any respiratory diseases? F157

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

h. Vaccination against bacterial respiratory disease due to
Mannheimia and/or Pasteurella? F160
Other procedures

1

2

3

4

8

i. Testing for bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) infection F161

1

2

3

4

8

j. Implantation? F162

1

2

3

4

8

k. Administration of a parasiticide? F163

1

2

3

4

8

Vaccinations
a. Vaccination against bovine viral diarrhea (BVD)? F153
b. Vaccination against clostridial diseases (e.g., blackleg)?
F154

[If Question 11e = none, SKIP to Other Procedures 11i]
f. Injectable vaccination against viral respiratory disease?
F158

g. Intranasal vaccination against viral respiratory disease?
F159

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

4

NAHMS ID: _____________________

l. Administration of an immunostimulant (e.g., Zelnate™)?

1

2

3

4

8

m. Individual weighing of the animal? F165

1

2

3

4

8

n. Taking the temperature of the animal? F166

1

2

3

4

8

o. Listening to lungs with stethoscope? F167

1

2

3

4

8

p. Administration of injectable antibiotic? F168

1

2

3

4

8

q. Administration of vitamin and/or mineral injection? F169

1

2

3

4

8

r. Other procedure? F170
(specify:____F170_Other___________________________)

1

2

3

4

8

F164

12. Did group processing procedures in calendar year 2020
change when compared to those carried out in calendar year
2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects? F853
[If Question 12 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 14]

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

13. Please describe changes to group processing procedures in calendar year 2020 due to COVID-19 or its
effects below: F854

14. Continue to select none, some, most, all, NA for “Not Applicable” (if cattle of the given subgroup are not
placed or are not initially processed as a group), or DK for “Don’t Know” for these questions about subgroups
of cattle.
None

Some

Most

All

DK

NA

1

2

3

4

8

5

1

2

3

4

8

For bulls and bull calves, what proportion arrived at the
feedlot uncastrated? F173

1

2

3

4

8

d. What proportion of cattle arrived at the feedlot with
horns? F174

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

1

2

3

4

8

a. For heifers, what proportion had a pregnancy check at
arrival? F171
[If Question 14a = NA, SKIP to Question 14c]
b. For heifers, what proportion were administered an
abortifacient such as prostaglandin at arrival? F172
c.

5

[If Question 14d = None, DK, or NA, SKIP to Question 15]
e. What proportion of horned cattle were dehorned at the
feedlot? F175
f. What proportion of horned cattle were tipped at the
feedlot? F176

15. How frequently did you conduct pen-riding or walking procedures for:
Less
than
once a
day

Once a
day

Twice a
day

More
than
twice a
day

No
standard
procedure

a. New arrivals (at feedlot less than 15 days)? F177

1

2

3

4

5

b. Animals at feedlot 15 to 30 days? F178

1

2

3

4

5

c. Animals at feedlot 30 days or more? F179

1

2

3

4

5

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

5

NAHMS ID: _____________________

16. Were the following used to mitigate weather-related stress on this feedlot?
a. Shade/shelter F180

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

b. Sprinklers, misters, and/or water trucks F181
c. Wind breaks F182

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8DK

d. Building mounds F183

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

e. Feed additives, such as yeast, essential oils, or pepper extract F184

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

f.

1 Yes 3 No

Other (specify: __________ F185_Other________________________) F185

Disease Conditions
17. What percentage of all placed cattle of the following arrival weight classes were affected with bovine
respiratory disease (BRD) in 2020? What percentage of all placed cattle of the following arrival weight
classes died due to bovine respiratory disease during this time period?
[If it is not possible to estimate these percentages stratified by weight classes, enter DK for Don’t Know and
complete the cattle of all arrival weight classes row. If it is not possible to estimate the percentage for all
arrival weight classes, enter DK for Don’t Know]
Affected

Died

a. Cattle less than 400 lb at arrival

F186

% F190

%

b. Cattle 400 to 699 lb at arrival

F187

% F191

%

c.

F188

% F192

%

F189

% F193

%

Cattle 700 lb or greater at arrival
OR

d. Cattle of all arrival weight classes
18. Did the overall percentage of cattle on this feedlot affected with BRD in calendar
year 2020 differ from the percentage of cattle that were affected with BRD in calendar
year 2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects? F886

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 18 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 20]
19. Was the overall percentage of cattle on this feedlot affected with BRD in calendar
1 Higher than 2019
year 2020 higher or lower compared to the percentage of cattle that were affected
3 Lower than 2019
with BRD in calendar year 2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects? F887
20. What percentage of cattle developed the following conditions in 2020? If you are not familiar with the
condition or do not think you can provide an accurate estimate of the
percentage of cattle that developed it, answer DK.
[Refer to Reference Card 3 (Disease Conditions other than BRD) for the list of disease conditions]
% -8 DK
a. Acute interstitial pneumonia (i.e., AIP, dust pneumonia, atypical pneumonia) F198
b. Bloat

F199

% -8 DK

c.

F200

% -8 DK

d. Footrot (infectious pododermatitis)

F201

% -8 DK

e. Hairy heel wart (papillomatous digital dermatitis)

F202

% -8 DK

F203

% -8 DK

g. Pinkeye

F204

% -8 DK

h. Cardiovascular disease (e.g., heart failure, brisket disease)

F205

% -8 DK

F206
Fatigued cattle syndrome
Other (specify:________F207 Other _________________________________) F207

% -8 DK

f.

i.
j.

Other digestive disorders excluding bloat (e.g., coccidiosis, diarrhea)

Central nervous system (CNS) disease (e.g., polio, listeriosis, “brainers”)

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

%

6

NAHMS ID: _____________________

21. Did the overall percentage of cattle on this feedlot affected with any of the conditions below in calendar
year 2020 differ from the percentage of cattle that were affected with those conditions in calendar year 2019
due to COVID-19 or its effects?
If yes, was the overall percentage of cattle on this feedlot affected with the condition in calendar year 2020
higher or lower compared to the percentage of cattle that were affected with the condition in calendar year
2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects?
[Refer to Reference Card 3 (Disease Conditions) for the list of disease conditions]
Percentage in
2020 different
If yes, higher or lower
Condition
from 2019 due
than 2019?
to COVID-19?
a. Acute interstitial pneumonia (i.e., AIP, dust
1 Yes 3 No F898 1 Higher than 2019
pneumonia, atypical pneumonia)
8 DK F888
3 Lower than 2019
1 Yes 3 No F899 1 Higher than 2019
b. Bloat
8 DK F889
3 Lower than 2019
c. Other digestive disorders excluding bloat (e.g.,
1 Yes 3 No F900 1 Higher than 2019
coccidiosis, diarrhea)
8 DK F890
3 Lower than 2019
d. Central nervous system (CNS) disease (e.g., polio,
1 Yes 3 No F901 1 Higher than 2019
listeriosis, “brainers”)
8 DK F891
3 Lower than 2019
1 Yes 3 No F902 1 Higher than 2019
e. Pinkeye
8 DK F892
3 Lower than 2019
f. Cardiovascular disease (e.g., heart failure, brisket
1 Yes 3 No F903 1 Higher than 2019
disease)
8 DK F893
3 Lower than 2019
1 Yes 3 No F904 1 Higher than 2019
g. Fatigued cattle syndrome
8 DK F894
3 Lower than 2019
1 Yes 3 No F905 1 Higher than 2019
h. Footrot (infectious pododermatitis)
8 DK F895
3 Lower than 2019
1 Yes 3 No F906 1 Higher than 2019
i. Hairy heel wart (papillomatous digital dermatitis)
8 DK F896
3 Lower than 2019
j. Other (specify:________F897 Other
F907
1 Higher than 2019
1 Yes 3 No
F897
_________________________________)
3 Lower than 2019
22. When cattle died on this feedlot, what proportion of cattle had a
post-mortem examination (i.e., necropsy) performed? F211

None

Some

Most

All

DK

1

2

3

4

8

23. Are the following given to sick cattle as part of the initial course of treatment for:

Treatment

If no disease, SKIP column

Bovine
respiratory
disease
F212  No BRD

Digestive
disorders other
than bloat
(e.g., coccidiosis,
diarrhea)

Footrot

Pinkeye

F226  No digestive

F239  No

F252  No

disorders

footrot

pinkeye

a. Injectable antibiotic?

1 Yes 3 No
F213 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F227 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F240 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F253 8 DK

b. Bolus-dosed oral antibiotic?

1 Yes 3 No
F214 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F228 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F241 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F254 8 DK

c. In feed antibiotic?

1 Yes 3 No
F215 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F229 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No
F242 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F255 8 DK

d. Topical antibiotic?

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

7

NAHMS ID: _____________________

e. Respiratory vaccine?

1 Yes 3 No
F216 8 DK

f. Corticosteroid (e.g., Dexium®)?

1 Yes 3 No
F217 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F230 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F243 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F256 8 DK

g. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (e.g.,
Banamine®, aspirin)?

1 Yes 3 No
F218 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F231 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F244 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F257 8 DK

h. Antihistamine?

1 Yes 3 No
F219 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F232 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F245 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F258 8 DK

i. Vitamin B injection?

1 Yes 3 No
F220 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F233 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F246 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F259 8 DK

j. Vitamin C injection?

1 Yes 3 No
F221 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F234 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F247 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F260 8 DK

k. Immunostimulant (e.g., Zelnate™)?

1 Yes 3 No
F222 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F235 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F248 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F261 8 DK

l. Injectable mineral supplement (e.g.,
MultiMin®)?

1 Yes 3 No
F223 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F236 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F249 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F262 8 DK

m. Probiotic paste

1 Yes 3 No
F224 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F237 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F250 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F263 8 DK

n. Other?
(specify:_____F2XX_Other________)

1 Yes 3 No
F225 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F238 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F251 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No
F264 8 DK

24. Were there separate pens to house sick cattle (e.g., hospital pens)? F265

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 24 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 26]
25. Were the following resources provided to cattle in the hospital pen? Answer none of the time, some of
the time (as needed), or all of the time.
None of
the time

Some
of the
time

All of the
time

DK

a. Wind breaks

F266

1

2

3

8

b. Shade

F267

1

2

3

8

c. Sprinklers/misters to keep cattle cool

F268

1

2

3

8

d. Additional bedding (e.g., straw) compared to home pen

F269

1

2

3

8

e. Additional hay to eat compared to home pen
F270
f. Increased waterer/bunk space per animal compared to home pen

1

2

3

8

1

2

3

8

F271

g. Increased observation/surveillance compared to home pen

F272

1

2

3

8

h. Dust control

F273

1

2

3

8

i. Other (specify: __________F274_Other ____________)

F274

1

2

3

8

26. Did you receive information from slaughter facilities about the percentage of cattle
from this feedlot affected with liver abscesses resulting in condemnation of livers? F275

1 Yes 3 No
8 DK

[If Question 26 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 28]

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

8

NAHMS ID: _____________________

27. Approximately what percentage of slaughtered cattle of the following types had liver condemnations
due to liver abscesses?
Placed on this
feedlot?

a. Beef breed cattle given in-feed

antibiotics to control liver abscesses
b. Dairy or dairy cross breed cattle
given in-feed antibiotics to control
liver abscesses
c. Beef breed cattle NOT given in-feed
antibiotics to control liver abscesses
d. Dairy or dairy cross breed cattle NOT
given in-feed antibiotics to control
liver abscesses

F276 1 Yes

3 No
F277 1 Yes

3 No
F278 1 Yes

3 No
F279 1 Yes

3 No

Percentage with liver
condemnations?
If No, SKIP to 27b
If Yes 
If No, SKIP to 27c
If Yes 
If No, SKIP to 27d
If Yes 
If No, SKIP to 28
If Yes 

28. Did the rate of death loss in late-fed cattle in this feedlot in calendar year
2020 differ from the rate of death loss in late-fed cattle in calendar year 2019
due to COVID-19 or its effects? F908

F280 %

-8 DK

F281 %

-8 DK
F282 %

-8 DK

F283 %

-8 DK

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 28 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 30]
29. Was the rate of death loss in late-fed cattle in this feedlot in calendar
year 2020 higher or lower compared to the rate of death loss in late-fed
cattle in calendar year 2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects? F909
30. More generally, over the past 5 years, has there been an increase in
death loss in late-fed cattle on this feedlot (i.e., cattle fed 100 days or
more)? F284
[If Question 30 = No or DK, SKIP to Section B]
31. Were the following associated with this increased late-fed death loss?
a. Bovine respiratory disease, excluding acute interstitial pneumonia F285
b. Acute interstitial pneumonia (i.e., dust pneumonia, atypical pneumonia)
F286

c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

Injury (e.g., downers, fractures) F287
Fatigued cattle syndrome F288
Heart failure F289
Bloat F291
Other (specify: ___________F290_Other_____________________) F290

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1 Higher than 2019
3 Lower than 2019

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
1 Yes

9

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Section B—Antibiotic Use
1. Were any antibiotics used in cattle on this feedlot (all forms; e.g., injectable,
bolus-dosed, in feed, and/or in water) in 2020? F300

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 1 = No or DK, SKIP to Section C]
Injectable and Bolus-Dosed Antibiotic Use
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

2. Were injectable or bolus-dosed antibiotics used on this feedlot? F301
[If Question 2 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 11.a]

3. How important were the following factors in the selection of injectable and bolus-dosed antibiotics?
Not
Important

Slightly
Important

Moderately
Important

Very
Important

Extremely
Important

a. Veterinarian recommendations F302

1

2

3

4

5

b. Other producers’ recommendations F303

1

2

3

4

5

c.

1

2

3

4

5

d. Drug company advertisement F305

1

2

3

4

5

e. Personal experience (past response rates)

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

h. Duration of action (e.g., only needs to be
given once) F309

1

2

3

4

5

i.

Drug withdrawal time F310

1

2

3

4

5

j.

Over the counter availability (i.e., no
prescription required) F311
Other (specify ___F312_Other_______) F312

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

Laboratory test results F304

F306

f.

Cost of antibiotic F307

g. Approved route by which antibiotic is given
F308

k.

4. For this question, individual treatment is defined as the administration of
antibiotics only to those cattle identified to be sick.
Were cattle administered injectable or bolus-dosed antibiotics for the
individual treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD)?

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
F313

[If Question 4 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 7]
5. For this question, consider only the cattle that you identified in Section A, Question 17; Page 6, to be
affected with BRD. For each of the following injectable or bolus-dosed antibiotics, what percentage
of these cattle were individually treated for BRD with this antibiotic for their initial treatment?
[Write in DK if the estimate is unknown. Refer to Reference Card 4 (Antibiotics Given via Injection or
Bolus)]

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

10

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Active ingredient name (Trade name examples)

% all sick cattle

a. Tilmicosin (Micotil®)
b. Gamithromycin (Zactran®)
c. Tulathromycin (Draxxin®)
d. Tylosin (Tylan® 200)
e. Tildipirosin (Zuprevo®)
f. Florfenicol (Nuflor®)
g. Florfenicol w/ flunixin meglumine (Resflor Gold®)
h. Enrofloxacin (Baytril®)
i. Danofloxacin (Advocin™)
j. Ceftiofur (Naxcel®, Excenel®, Excede®)
k. Oxytetracycline (LA-200®, BioMycin®)
l. Penicillin (Aquacillin™, Penicillin G Procaine)
m. Ampicillin (Polyflex®)
n. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Injection)
o. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Bolus)
p. Sulfamethazine (Sustain III® Bolus, Supra Sulfa® III)

F314
F315
F316
F317
F318
F319
F320
F321
F322
F323
F324
F325
F326
F327
F328
F329

6. Of the sick cattle described in Question B5 that were initially treated for BRD, what percentage:
[Write DK if unknown]
% all sick cattle

a. Responded and recovered?

F330

b. Died or were euthanized?

F331

c. Were considered chronics and marketed early?

F332

d. Did not respond and were re-treated?

F333

7. For this question, GROUP administration of antibiotics means that the majority
of the pen was given an antibiotic at one time.

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
F334

Were cattle on your feedlot administered injectable or bolus-dosed antibiotics
as a GROUP for the prevention, control, or treatment of BRD?
[If Question 7 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 9]

8. For each of the following injectable or bolus-dosed antibiotics, what percentage of cattle were given this
antibiotic as a GROUP for the prevention, control, or treatment of BRD?
[Answer by weight class at arrival if possible. If not, answer for all cattle overall. Write in DK if the estimate
is unknown. Refer to Reference Card 4 (Antibiotics Given via Injection or Bolus)]
Arrival Weight

Active ingredient name (Trade name examples)
a. Tilmicosin (Micotil®)
b. Gamithromycin (Zactran®)
c. Tulathromycin (Draxxin®)
d. Tylosin (Tylan® 200)
e. Tildipirosin (Zuprevo®)
f. Florfenicol (Nuflor®)
VS Form 21-303
March 2021

% all
cattle

% cattle
<400 lb
Fa335

% cattle 400 % cattle
699 lb
≥700 lb
Fb335
Fc335

Fa336

Fb336

Fc336

Fa337

Fb337

Fc337

F337

Fa338

Fb338

Fc338

F338

Fa339

Fb339

Fc339

F339

Fa340

Fb340

Fc340

F340

F335
OR

F336

11

NAHMS ID: _____________________

g. Florfenicol w/ flunixin meglumine (Resflor Gold®)
h. Enrofloxacin (Baytril®)
i. Danofloxacin (Advocin™)
j. Ceftiofur (Naxcel®, Excenel®, Excede®)
k. Oxytetracycline (LA-200®, BioMycin®)
l. Penicillin (Aquacillin™, Penicillin G Procaine)
m. Ampicillin (Polyflex®)
n. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Injection)
o. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Bolus)
p. Sulfamethazine (Sustain III® Bolus, Supra Sulfa® III)

Fa341

Fb341

Fc341

F341

Fa342

Fb342

Fc342

F342

Fa343

Fb343

Fc343

F343

Fa344

Fb344

Fc344

F344

Fa345

Fb345

Fc345

F345

Fa346

Fb346

Fc346

F346

Fa347

Fb347

Fc347

F347

Fa348

Fb348

Fc348

F348

Fa349

Fb349

Fc349

F349

Fa350

Fb350

Fc350

F350

9. Were sick cattle on your feedlot administered injectable or bolus-dosed
antibiotics for the individual treatment of conditions other than BRD?

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
F351

[If Question 9 = No or DK, SKIP to Question 11.a]
10. For this question, consider only the cattle that you identified in Section A, Question 19; Page 6 to
have developed the conditions in that question, also listed in the reason codes below. If an injectable or
bolus-dosed antibiotic in the list below was used to individually treat cattle with these conditions, enter
the reason code corresponding to the most common reason (primary reason) in the list that this
antibiotic was used. [Refer to Reference Cards 3 (Disease conditions other than BRD) and 4 (Antibiotics
Given via Injection or Bolus)]
Active ingredient name
(Trade name examples)

a. Tilmicosin (Micotil®)
b. Gamithromycin (Zactran®)
c. Tulathromycin (Draxxin®)
d. Tylosin (Tylan® 200)
e. Tildipirosin (Zuprevo®)
f. Florfenicol (Nuflor®)
g. Florfenicol with flunixin meglumine (Resflor Gold®)
h. Ceftiofur (Naxcel®, Excenel®, Excede®)
i. Oxytetracycline (LA-200®, BioMycin®)
j. Penicillin (Aquacillin™, Penicillin G Procaine)
k. Ampicillin (Polyflex®)
l. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Injection)
m. Sulfadimethoxine (Albon® Bolus)
n. Sulfamethazine (Sustain III® Bolus, Supra Sulfa® III)

Reason
Code

Reason Codes for Question 10

F352
F353
F354
F355
F356
F357
F358
F359
F360
F361

1

Acute Interstitial Pneumonia

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Bloat
Other digestive disorders
Footrot
wart
Hairy heel warts
CNS disease
Pinkeye
Cardiovascular disease
Fatigued cattle syndrome
Other
(specify:_____F3XX_Other_______)

F362
F363

10

F364
F365

Antibiotic Use in Feed
11.a. Were any antibiotics that DO NOT require a veterinary feed directive (VFD)
used in feed on this feedlot?
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
Examples of antibiotics that DO NOT require a VFD include ionophores (e.g.,
Rumensin®, Monovet®, Bovatec®, and Cattlyst®), bambermycin, and bacitracin.

F366a

11.b. Were any antibiotics that DO require a VFD used in feed on this feedlot?
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
Examples of antibiotics that DO require a VFD include chlortetracycline and
tylosin.

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

F366b

12

NAHMS ID: _____________________

[If Question 11.a AND 11b = No or DK, SKIP to Question 16
If Question 11.a = No or DK and Question 11.b = Yes, skip to Question 13
If Question 11.a = Yes and Question 11.b = No or DK, answer Question 12 then SKIP to Question
16]
12. For each of the following antibiotics that DO NOT require a VFD, what percentage of cattle overall
received it in feed for any reason? If the antibiotic was used, designate up to 2 reason codes from the box
below and the percentage of cattle that received it specifically for the reason(s). If the antibiotic was used
for only one reason, leave the Reason Code II columns blank.
[Refer to Reference Card 5 (Antibiotics Given via Feed or Water)]
Reason codes for Question 12
1
Coccidiosis
2
Growth promotion/improved feed efficiency
3
Reduction in the incidence of liver abcesses
4
Other (specify:_____________Fa36X_Other _____OR____ Fc36X_Other ___________________)
Active ingredient name
(Trade name examples)
a. Any ionophore (e.g., Rumensin®, Bovatec®)
b. Bambermycin (Gainpro® 10)
c. Bacitracin (BMD®, Baciferm®)

% cattle
overall

Reason
Code I

% cattle
for Reason
Code I

Reason
Code II

% cattle
for Reason
Code II

F367

Fa367

Fb367

Fc367

Fd367

F368

Fa368

Fb368

Fc368

Fd368

F369

Fa369

Fb369

Fc369

Fd369

13. This question asks about in-feed antibiotics that DO require a VFD used in cattle that were less than
700 lb at arrival. For each of the following antibiotics, what percentage of cattle less than 700 lb at arrival
overall received it in feed for any reason? If the antibiotic was used, designate up to 2 reason codes from
the box below and the percentage of cattle that received it specifically for the reason(s). If the antibiotic
was used for only one reason, leave the Reason Code II columns blank.
[Refer to Reference Card 5 (Antibiotics Given via Feed or Water)]
Reason codes for Question 13
1
Reduction in the incidence of liver abscesses
2
Respiratory disease (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, shipping fever)
3
Gastrointestinal disease (e.g., bacterial enteritis [diarrhea])
4
Anaplasmosis
5
Other (specify:___Fa37X_Other__OR__Fc37X_Other_______________________________)
Active ingredient name
(Trade name examples)
a. Chlortetracycline (Aureomycin®, Aureomix®, CTC)
b. Oxytetracycline (Terramycin®, OTC)
c. Sulfamethazine/sulfadimethoxine (Aureomix®)
d. Neomycin (Neomix)
e. Tylosin (Tylan, Tylovet)
f. Virginiamycin (Vmax)
g. Tilmicosin (Pulmotil®, Tilmovet®)

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

% cattle
overall

Reason
Code I

% cattle
for Reason
Code I

Reason
Code II

% cattle
for Reason
Code II

F370

Fa370

Fb370

Fc370

Fd370

F371

Fa371

Fb371

Fc371

Fd371

F372

Fa372

Fb372

Fc372

Fd372

F373

Fa373

Fb373

Fc373

Fd373

F374

Fa374

Fb374

Fc374

Fd374

F375

Fa375

Fb375

Fc375

Fd375

F376

Fa376

Fb376

Fc376

Fd376

13

NAHMS ID: _____________________

14.This question asks about in-feed antibiotics that DO require a VFD used in cattle that were 700 lb or
greater at arrival. For each of the following antibiotics, what percentage of cattle 700 lb or greater at
arrival overall received it in feed for any reason? If the antibiotic was used, designate up to 2 reason
codes from the box below and the percentage of cattle that received it specifically for the reason(s). If the
antibiotic was used for only one reason, leave the Reason Code II columns blank.
[Refer to Reference Card 5 (Antibiotics Given via Feed or Water)]
Reason codes for Question 14
1
Reduction in the incidence of liver abscesses
2
Respiratory disease (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, shipping fever)
3
Gastrointestinal disease (e.g., bacterial enteritis [diarrhea])
4
Anaplasmosis
5
Other (specify:___________ Fa3XX_Other__OR__Fc3XX_Other________________________)
Active ingredient name
(Trade name examples)
a. Chlortetracycline (Aureomycin®, Aureomix®, CTC)
b. Oxytetracycline (Terramycin®, OTC)
c. Sulfamethazine/sulfadimethoxine (Aureomix®)
d. Neomycin (Neomix)
e. Tylosin (Tylan, Tylovet)
f. Virginiamycin (Vmax)
g. Tilmicosin (Pulmotil®, Tilmovet®)

%
cattle
overall

Reason
Code I

% cattle
for Reason
Code I

Reason
Code II

% cattle
for Reason
Code II

F377

Fa377

Fb377

Fc377

Fd377

F378

Fa378

Fb378

Fc378

Fd378

F379

Fa379

Fb379

Fc379

Fd379

F380

Fa380

Fb380

Fc380

Fd380

F381

Fa381

Fb381

Fc381

Fd381

F382

Fa382

Fb382

Fc382

Fd382

F383

Fa383

Fb383

Fc383

Fd383

[If Question 13.a and 14.a = 0, i.e. no chlortetracycyline was used in feed, SKIP to Question 16. If
chlortetracycline was used but reason code was NOT 2, SKIP to Question 16]
15. In-feed chlortetracycline (10 mg/lb/day) is currently approved for use in cattle for 5 days to treat
respiratory disease. If cattle do not respond to this pulse treatment, producers have the option to obtain a
second VFD from a veterinarian to administer a second pulse, and so on.

When chlortetracycline was used in feed for the treatment
of respiratory disease, what proportion of cattle received
more than one pulse treatment? F384

None

Some

Most

All

DK

1

2

3

4

8

Answer None (0%), Some (50% or less), Most (more than 50%), or
All (100%).

Antibiotic Use in Water
16. Were any antibiotics used in water on this feedlot? F385

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 16 = No or DK, SKIP to Section C]
17. For each of the following in-water antibiotics, what percentage of cattle overall received it in water for
any reason? If the antibiotic was used, designate up to 2 reason codes from the box below and the
percentage of cattle that received it specifically for the reason(s).
[Refer to Reference Card 5 (Antibiotics Given via Feed or Water)]

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

14

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Reason codes for Question 16
1
Respiratory disease (e.g., bacterial pneumonia, shipping fever)
2
Gastrointestinal disease (e.g., bacterial enteritis [diarrhea])
3
Pinkeye
4
Footrot
5
Other (specify:___________________ Fa3XX_Other__OR__Fc3XX_Other _______________ _)

Active ingredient name
a. Chlortetracycline (Aureomycin®, CTC)
b. Oxytetracycline (Terramycin®, OTC)
c. Tetracycline (Duramycin, Tet-Sol)
d. Sulfamethazine/sulfadimethoxine (Sulfasol)
e. Neomycin (Neosol)
f. Spectinomycin (Spectam, SpectoGard)

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

% cattle
overall

Reason
Code I

% cattle
for Reason
Code I

Reason
Code II

% cattle
for Reason
Code II

F386

Fa386

Fb386

Fc386

Fd386

F387

Fa387

Fb387

Fc387

Fd387

F388

Fa388

Fb388

Fc388

Fd388

F389

Fa389

Fb389

Fc389

Fd389

F390

Fa390

Fb390

Fc390

Fd390

F391

Fa391

Fb391

Fc391

Fd391

15

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Section C—Nutrition
1. Of all cattle placed on feed, what percentage were ever given the following during the feeding period?
a. A coccidiostat other than an ionophore, such as amprolium (e.g.,
F400
%
-8 DK
Corid®) or decoquinate (e.g., Deccox®)?
-8 DK
b. A beta-agonist (e.g., ractopamine)
F401
%
c.

Was the percentage of cattle fed a beta-agonist (e.g., ractopamine)
in calendar year 2020 different than the percentage of cattle fed a
beta-agonist in calendar year 2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects?

1 Yes
3 No
8 DK

F800

[If Question 1c = No or DK, SKIP to Question 2]
d. Was the percentage of cattle fed a beta-agonist in calendar year 2020
more or less than the percentage of cattle fed a beta-agonist in F801
calendar year 2019 due to COVID-19 or its effects?

1 More than 2019
3 Less than 2019
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

2. Did this feedlot use the services of a nutritionist? F402

3. Which of the following water sources were used for the cattle on this feedlot?
a. Ground water (well)
F403
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
b. Surface water (ponds, lakes, streams, water storage from river flows) F404 1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
c.

Municipal water supply

F405

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

4. Were any of the following feed additives used on this feedlot? If yes, which of the following were
reasons they were included in the ration? [Check all that apply]
If used on feedlot, for what reason(s)
Used on
feedlot?

a. Direct-fed microbial or
probiotic (e.g.,
Lactobacillus acidophilus
or yeast)
b. Yeast fermentation
products
c. Prebiotics (e.g., mannanoligosaccharides)
d. Vitamin supplements

1 Yes
3 No
F406

1 Yes
3 No
F407

1 Yes
3 No
F408

1 Yes
3 No
F409

e. Organic mineral
supplements
f. Inorganic mineral
supplements

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1 Yes
3 No
F410

1 Yes
3 No
F411

Improve
growth
rate and/or
feed
efficiency

Antibiotic
Alternative

Bovine
respiratory
disease

Hoof
health

Preharvest
food
safety

Reduce
liver
abscesses

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa406

Fb406

Fc406

Fd406

Fe406

Ff406

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa407

Fb407

Fc407

Fd407

Fe407

Ff407

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa408

Fb408

Fc408

Fd408

Fe408

Ff408

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa409

Fb409

Fc409

Fd409

Fe409

Ff409

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa410

Fb410

Fc410

Fd410

Fe410

Ff410

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa411

Fb411

Fc411

Fd411

Fe411

Ff411

16

NAHMS ID: _____________________

g. Enzymes

1 Yes
3 No
F412

h. Essential oils and plantderived products (e.g.,
yucca extract)
i. Other
(specify:___F414_Other__)

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1 Yes
3 No
F413

1 Yes
3 No
F414

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa412

Fb412

Fc412

Fd412

Fe412

Ff412

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa413

Fb413

Fc413

Fd413

Fe413

Ff413

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa414

Fb414

Fc414

Fd414

Fe414

Ff414

17

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Section D—Biosecurity
1.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

Were the following practices used on this feedlot?
Control access for visitors entering animal areas
F500
Restrict access of visitors onto the feedlot premises
F804
Disposable or clean boots for visitors entering animal areas F501
Footbaths for visitors entering animal areas
F502
Control access for vehicles entering animal areas
F503
Restrict access of vehicles onto the feedlot premises
F805
Restrict movement of horses onto the feedlot premises
F504
Did any of these practices change in calendar year 2020 due to
COVID-19 or its effects?
F806

1 Yes 3 No 4 No visitors
1 Yes 3 No 4 No visitors
1 Yes 3 No 4 No visitors
1 Yes 3 No 4 No visitors
1 Yes 3 No 4 No vehicles
1 Yes 3 No 4 No vehicles
1 Yes 3 No 4 No horses
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 1h = No or DK, then SKIP to Question 2]
i. Please describe changes to the above biosecurity practices in 2020 due to COVID-19 or its effects
below: F807

2.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

Were the following practices used on this feedlot?
Insect control
Rodent control
Bird control
Have dead cattle picked up at edge of property
Compost deads on site

F505
F506
F507
F508
F509

3. Did this feedlot have a written or electronic biosecurity plan?
4. Does this feedlot have a shared fenceline with another operation
such that there could be nose to nose contact with other cattle,
bison or other domestic ruminants?

1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No
1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

F510

F511

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 4 = YES, then SKIP to Question 6]
5. How close, to the nearest ½ mile, is this feedlot to another operation with
cattle, bison, or other domestic ruminants? F512

miles
Number of employees

6. How many employees directly involved in cattle care did this feedlot have on
average in 2020? F513
[If Question 6 = 0, SKIP to Question 8]
7. Did employees of this feedlot…
a. Have contact with cattle, bison, or other ruminants on other operations? F514 1 Yes 3 No 8 DK
b. Own cattle, bison, or other ruminants at another location?

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

F515

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

18

NAHMS ID: _____________________

8. Did cattle stay in the same pen during the entire feeding period?

F516

1 Yes 3 No 8 DK

[If Question 8 = YES or DK, then SKIP to Question 10]
Number

9. How many times were cattle re-sorted during the feeding period? F517
10. How familiar are you with the Secure Beef Supply Plan? [Check one only] F518
1
2
3
4

Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Heard of name only
Not familiar

Thank you for your help in completing this survey. Please feel free to use this space or the back
of this questionnaire to communicate comments about the survey or any other information about
health management on your feedlot that you think is relevant, including any information about the
impact of COVID-19 on the operations of the feedlot.
Comments fcmnts: ______________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

19

NAHMS ID: _____________________

Section E—Office Use Only
State FIPS:__________
2-digits

Operation #:_________
5-digits

Interviewer:___________ Date:
/
/
Initials
(mm/dd/yy)

1. Total time for interview [include time to discuss the program
and complete the questionnaire] ............................................................................... Time_interview min
2. Total travel time [round trip] ......................................................................................

Time_travel min

3. Data collector(s) (Enter the number for each category.)
_____ Federal VMO

_____ Other (specify in margin)

VFED/VOTH

_____ State VMO

VST

4. Enter response code 99 if questionnaire is completed or enter
one code of 00 through 07 that best describes the reason why the owner
is not participating .....................................................................................................Response_code code
99 = Survey completed
00 = Producer not contacted by VMO
01 = Poor time of year to contact or no time available to participate
02 = Doesn’t want anyone on operation
03 = Bad experience with government veterinarian(s)
04 = Doesn’t want to do another survey or divulge information
05 = Told NASS they didn’t want to be contacted by VS
06 = Ineligible (no longer in operation)
07 = Other (explain in the comments section below)
5. Which of the following best describes the respondent’s position
with this operation? ............................................................................................ Respondent_role__code
1 = Owner
2 = Manager
3 = Family member (other than owner or manager)
4 = Other hired employee (non-veterinarian)
5= Veterinarian on staff (e.g., company veterinarian)
6= Herd veterinarian or other veterinarian
7 = Other (specify: _______________________________)
6. Producer data quality .......................................... PDQ

1 Good to excellent

2 OK

3 Poor

7. Comments regarding this questionnaire or operation: Final_Comments

VMO signature: ________________VMO_signature___________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY COORDINATOR:
8. Field data quality………………………………………FDQ……1 Good to excellent

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

2 OK

3 Poor

20

NAHMS ID: _____________________

REFERENCE CARD 1: Paperwork Reduction Act

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-0079. The time required
to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time
to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and
review the information collected.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE
VETERINARY SERVICES
NATIONAL ANIMAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM
2150 CENTRE AVE, BLDG B
FORT COLLINS, CO 80526

OMB Approved
0579-0079
EXP: 04/2023

HEALTH MANAGEMENT ON
U.S. FEEDLOTS 2021
PHASE 2 QUESTIONNAIRE

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

21

NAHMS ID: _____________________

REFERENCE CARD 2: Vaccine Examples
[For use with Phase 2 questionnaire, Section A, Question 11]
Type of Vaccine

Example trade names

Boehringer Ingelheim Elite, Express, Prism, Pyramid, Triangle
Colorado Serum Pre-Breed, Respira
Injectable vaccines against
Elanco Master Guard, Titanium, Vira Shield
BVD and/or viral respiratory
Merck Vista
disease (e.g., IBR, BVD,
Texas Vet Lab Multi-Vac 3L, Super Poly-Bac B
PI3, BRSV)
Zoetis Bovi-Shield 4, GOLD, and IBR, Cattle Master, One Shot
BVD or Ultra 7, PregGuard GOLD FP 10, Resvac 4/Somubac
Intranasal vaccines against
BVD and/or viral respiratory Zoetis Inforce 3, TSV-2
disease (e.g., IBR, BVD,
Merck Nasalgen IP
PI3, BRSV)

Vaccines against bacterial
respiratory disease
(Mannheima haemolytica
and Pasteurella multocida)

Vaccines against clostridial
diseases

Vaccines against Moraxella
(pinkeye)

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

AgriLabs Pulmo-Guard
Boehringer Ingelheim Bar Somnus 2P, Presponse, Triangle 4 or 9 PH-K,
Pyramid+Presponse, Bo-Bac 2X
Colorado Serum Mannheimia Haemolytica-Pasteurella Multocida
Bacterin
Elanco Titanium PH-M, Nuplura PH, Vira Shield 6 +/- Somnus
Durvet Durvac Past HM
Immvac ENDOVAC
Merck Vista Once SQ, Once PMH
Texas Vet Lab Poly-Bac B or Super Poly-Bac B
Zoetis Bovi-Shield GOLD One Shot, One Shot, One Shot Ultra
Boehringer Ingelheim Alpha 7 or CD, Bar-Vac,, Caliber 3 or 7
Colorado Serum Essential
Elanco Pili Shield + C, Clostri Shield, Scour Bos 9
Merck 20/20 Vision 7 with Spur, Cavalry 9, Covexin 8, Guardian,
Vision 7, 8, CD, or DC-T with Spur, Piliguard Pinkeye + 7,
Super-Tet with Havlogen
Professional Biological Clostridium perfringens Type C&D Toxoid
and Toxoid-Tetanus Toxoid
Zoetis One Shot Ultra 7 or 8, Ultrabac 7, 8, or CD, UltraChoice 7,
8, or CD, ScourGuard 4KC
AgriLabs I-Site XP, Moraxella bovoculi bacterin
Addison Maxi/Guard Pinkeye Bacterin
Boehringer Ingelheim Ocu-Guard-MB-1, Alpha7/MB-1
Elanco Pinkeye Shield XT4
Merck 20/20 Vision 7 with Spur, Piliguard Pinkeye+7, Piliguard Pinkeye-1
Trivalent
Zoetis SolidBac Pinkeye IR/PR

22

NAHMS ID: _____________________

REFERENCE CARD 3: Disease Conditions other than BRD
[For use with Phase 2 questionnaire, Section A, Questions 20-21 and Section B, Question 10]
Code Disease Condition

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

1

Acute Interstitial Pneumonia (e.g.,
AIP, dust pneumonia, atypical
pneumonia

2

Bloat

3

Other digestive disorders (e.g.,
coccidiosis, diarrhea)

4

Footrot

5

Hairy heel wart

6

Central Nervous System disease
(e.g., polio, listeriosis, “brainers”)

7

Pinkeye

8

Cardiovascular disease (e.g., heart
failure, brisket disease)

9

Fatigued cattle syndrome

10

Other

23

NAHMS ID: _____________________

REFERENCE CARD 4: Antibiotics Given via Injection or Bolus
[For use with Phase 2 questionnaire, Section B, Questions 5, 8, and 10]
Codes are provided for use in electronic questionnaire and are not necessary for paperadministered questionnaire
ANTIBIOTICS GIVEN VIA INJECTION OR BOLUS
Code Active Ingredient

Product Name

1

Tilmicosin

Micotil

2

Gamithromycin

Zactran

3

Tulathromycin

Draxxin

4

Tylosin

Tylan 200

5

Tildipirosin

Zuprevo

6

Florfenicol

Nuflor

7

Florfenicol with Flunixin meglumine

Resflor Gold

8

Enrofloxacin*

Baytril

9

Danofloxacin*

Advocin

10

Ceftiofur

Naxcel, Excenel, Excede

11

Oxytetracycline

LA-200, BioMycin

12

Penicillin

Aquacillin, Penicillin G Procaine

13

Ampicillin

Polyflex

14

Sulfadimethoxine (injectable)

Albon Injection

15

Sulfadimethoxine (Bolus)

Albon Bolus

16

Sulfamethazine

Sustain III Bolus, Supra Sulfa

*These antibiotics are labeled only for the treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) associated with
Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni and Mycoplasma bovis in beef and nonlactating dairy cattle and for the control of BRD in beef and non-lactating dairy cattle at high risk of
developing BRD associated with Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni and
Mycoplasma bovis, and their extra-label use is prohibited. Therefore, these antibiotics are not presented
as options for Section B, Question 10 (individual treatment of conditions other than BRD).

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

24

NAHMS ID: _____________________

REFERENCE CARD 5: Antibiotics Given via Feed or Water
[For use with Phase 2 questionnaire, Section B, Questions 12, 13, 14, 15, & 17]
Codes for antibiotics that don’t require a veterinary feed directive (VFD) are not necessary for
either the electronic questionnaire or the paper-administered questionnaire so are not provided
ANTIBIOTICS USED IN FEED THAT DO NOT REQUIRE A VFD
Active Ingredient

Product Name

Ionophore

Rumensin, Bovatec

Bambermycin

Gainpro 10

Bacitracin

BMD, Baciferm

Codes for VFD antibiotics and antibiotics used in water are provided for use in electronic
questionnaire and are not necessary for paper-administered questionnaire
ANTIBIOTICS USED IN FEED THAT DO REQUIRE A VFD
Code Active Ingredient

Product Name

1

Chlortetracyline

Aureomycin, Aureomix

2

Oxytetracycline

3

Chlortetracycline/Sulfamethazine

4

Neomycin

Terramycin, OTC
AS700, Aureo S 700,
Aureomix S 700
Neomix

5

Tylosin

Tylan, Tylovet

6

Virginiamycin

Vmax

7

Tilmicosin

Pulmotil, Tilmovet
ANTIBIOTICS USED IN WATER

Code Active Ingredient
1

Chlortetracyline

2

Oxytetracycline

3

5

Tetracycline
Sulfamethazine /
Sulfadimethoxine
Neomycin

6

Spectinomycin

4

VS Form 21-303
March 2021

Product Name
Aureomycin,
Chloronex
Terramycin, OTC
Duramycin, Tet-Sol
Sulfasol
Neosol
Spectam,
SpectoGard

25


File Typeapplication/pdf
AuthorLombard, Jason E - APHIS
File Modified2020-09-14
File Created2020-09-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy