Crosswalk - FFS Annual Report

2019 (old version)	2020 (new version)	Type of Change	Reason for Change	Burden Change
N/A	Added questions to address SUPPORT Act Section 1004 and MCO contract updates in section X, question 3. Question language: Contract updates between state and MCOs addressing DUR provisions in Section 1004 Support for Patients and Communities Act are required based on 1902(oo). If covered outpatient drugs are included in an MCO’s covered benefit package, confirm that the State has updated their MCOs’ contracts for compliance with section 1004 of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act: o Yes, contracts are updated to address each provision. Please specify effective date o No, contracts are not updated, please explain : The state is complying with Federal law and monitoring MCO compliance on SUPPORT act provisions? o Yes, state is complying with Federal law and monitoring MCO compliance on SUPPORT act provisions. Please explain monitoring activities: o No, please explain:	Add	Contract updates between state and MCOs are a requirement for funding based on 1902(oo)-are MCO contracts updated. Questions provide attestation that states are complying with Federal law and monitoring MCO compliance	None, general questions, no research involved
Removal/revision of questions to better address the new requirements. Previous Language: Does your state agency cover Methadone for a substance use disorder (i.e. Methadone Treatment Center )? If yes, is there at least one formulation of methadone for OUD available without a prior authorization?  Yes, please explain:  No, please explain Does your state agency cover Methadone for a substance use disorder (i.e. Methadone Treatment Center)? If yes, there at least one formulation of methadone for OUD available without a prior authorization?  Yes, please explain:  No, please explain:	Updated questions to address SUPPORT Act Section 1006 (b) with updates in section VIII, subsection F and E. Revised language: Does your state cover outpatient treatment programs that provide both services and MAT through outpatient treatment programs (OTPs)? o Yes o No, please explain why not, If yes, is a referral needed for OUD treatment through OTP? o Yes, please explain o No, please explain Does your state agency cover Methadone for a substance use disorder (i.e. Outpatient Treatment Program)? o Yes o No, please explain why not Does your state agency cover buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone for diagnoses of OUD as part of a comprehensive MAT treatment plan through OTPs?  Yes  No, please explain why not Does your state agency cover naltrexone for diagnoses of OUD as part of a comprehensive MAT treatment plan?  Yes  No, please explain why not Opioid Use Disorder treatments: Do you have a utilization controls (i.e. preferred drug lists, prior authorization, quantity limits) to either monitor or manage the prescribing of MAT drugs for OUD?  Yes, please explain:  No Is there at least one formulation of naltrexone for OUD available without a prior authorization?  Yes  No: Does your state agency cover Methadone for a substance use disorder (i.e. Methadone Treatment Center )? Outpatient treatment programs: Does your state cover outpatient treatment programs that provide both services and MAT through outpatient treatment programs (OTPs)? o Yes o No, please explain why not If yes, is a referral needed for OUD treatment through OTP? o Yes, please explain o No, please explain Does your state agency cover Methadone for a substance use disorder (i.e. Outpatient Treatment Program)? o Yes o No, please explain why not Does your state agency cover buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone for diagnoses of OUD as part of a comprehensive MAT treatment plan through OTPs?  Yes  No, please explain why not Do you have a utilization controls (i.e. preferred drug lists, prior authorization, quantity limits) to either monitor or manage the prescribing of MAT drugs for OUD?  Yes, please explain:  No Is there at least one formulation of naltrexone for OUD available without a prior authorization?  Yes  No	Rev	Section 1006(b) makes MAT a mandatory state plan benefit effective October 1st, 2020 MAT.	No change, added, removed and streamlined and improved questions by eliminating text boxes and attachments for added clarity and simplification of completing survey, no net burden change.
Removal/Revision of questions: 1. Does your state have a Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP)? a. Does your agency have the ability to query the state’s PDMP database? i) Do you also have access to Border States’ PDMP information? ii) Do you also have PDMP data (i.e. outside of MMIS, such as a controlled substance that was paid for by using cash) integrated into your POS edits? b. Do you require prescribers (in your provider agreement with the agency) to access the PDMP patient history before prescribing controlled substances? c. Are there barriers that hinder the agency from fully accessing the PDMP that prevent the program from being utilized the way it was intended to be to curb abuse? 2. Have you had any changes to your state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program during this reporting period that have improved the agency's ability to access PDMP data?	Added questions to address PDMP SUPPORT Act 5042 in VIII, subsection B: In the case that a provider is not able to conduct PDMP check, do you require the prescriber to document a good faith effort, including the reasons why the provider was not able to conduct the check?o Yes o No, please explain. If yes, do you require the provider to submit, upon request, to submit such documentation to the State? o Yes o No, please explain Are providers required to have protocols for responses to information from the PDMP that is contradictory to the direction that the practitioner expect from the client? Yes/no. If not I don’t think we need an explain but perhaps option for drop down, might consider developing, in process etc. o Yes, o No (drop down boxes for in process, may consider developing) In the State’s PDMP system, which of the following pieces of information with respect to a beneficiary, is available to prescribers as close to real-time as possible? Check all that apply: • Prescription drug history • The number and type of controlled substances prescribed to and filled for the covered individual during at least the most recent 12-month period. •The name, location, and contact information or other identifying number such as a national provider identifier • Other Mandatory in 2023, optional now, under section 1927(g)(3)(D) of the Act, please specify, the following information for the 12-month reporting period for this survey: a) The percentage of covered providers who checked the prescription drug history of a beneficiary through a PDMP before prescribing to such individual a controlled substance ____%. b) Average daily morphine milligram equivalents prescribed for controlled substances per covered individual: ____ MMEs c) In table below, please specify the top 3 controlled substances prescribed based on claim count (by generic ingredient(s)), during this FFY reporting period. Children under 18: 19-40 year olds: 41-60 year olds: 61 and above: Individuals with disabilities: Individuals who are enrolled under both this title and title XVIII: Within each population, please specify the average number of controlled prescriptions per month per total number of beneficiaries with each population: children under 18: 19-40 year olds: 41-60 year olds: 61 and above: Individuals with disabilities: Individuals who are enrolled under both this title and title XVIII: If any of the information requested is not reported above, please explain why not: Does the State require pharmacists to check the prescription drug history before dispensing a controlled substance to such individual? o Yes o No, please explain why not: If yes, are there protocols involved in checking the PDMP o Yes, please explain o No In this reporting period, have there been any data or privacy breachs of the PDMP or PDMP data? o Yes o No If yes, please summarize the breach, the number of individuals impacted, a description of the steps the State has taken to address each such breach, and if the law enforcement or the affected individuals were notified of the breach.	Rev	Added questions regarding PDMP to alert states to new 2023 requirements in SUPPORT act 5042	Estimated burden 4 hours
Updated DUR questions to align with modernization of programs	Updated questions to address DUR oversight, monitoring and collaborations between MCO and FFS programs in section X: Is the retrospective DUR program operated by the state or by the MCOs or does your state use a combination of state interventions as well as individual MCO interventions? o State operated o MCOs operated o State uses a combination of state interventions as well as individual MCO interventions Indicate how the State oversees the FFS and MCO retrospective DUR programs? Please explain oversight process: How does the state ensure MCO compliance with DUR requirements described in section 1927(g) of the Act and 42 CFR part 456, subpart K?	Rev	Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. Subpart A, Section § 438.3(s), MCOs must operate a DUR program that complies with the requirements described in section 1927(g) of the Act and 42 CFR part 456, subpart K, as if such requirement applied to the MCO, PIHP, or PAHP instead of the State. The MCO DUR program is required to operate like the State’s FFS DUR program and must be as comprehensive as the State’s FFS DUR program.	No, no research involved
N/A	Added question to address importation Act in section IX: Does your state have any demonstrations or waivers to allow importation of certain drugs from Canada or other countries that are versions of FDA-approved drugs for dispensing to Medicaid Beneficiaries? o Yes, please explain o No	Add	Requested information on waivers and state demonstrations that allow importation of certain drugs that are versions of FDA-approved drugs for dispensing to Medicaid Beneficiaries	No, no research involved
N/A	Restructured several questions to make them streamlined and concise with multiple choice responses and drop down menus to assist when possible. Boxes eliminated need for text boxes. No change was made to the content.	Rev	To make it easier for repondent to complete the surveys.	Eliminated text boxes and added mulitiple choice boxes to decrease work effort by 3 hours
Required word attachments to be submitted throughout	Removed attachments and naming conventions and created embedded text boxes	Rev	Reduced number of documents that had to be submitted and uploaded to streamline survey in a user-friendly manner and decrease work burden for state DUR contracts when submitting the survey online	Decrease work effort by 1 hour
			total:	No net change