NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHHH) (Proposed Rule)

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
2115t07.xlsx Supplementary Document	2020-09-24
2115ss07.docx Supporting Statement A	2020-09-24

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
24779	NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHHH)	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2060-0535	ICR Reference No: 202009-2060-004
Status: Received in OIRA	Previous ICR Reference No: 201908-2060-012
Agency/Subagency: EPA/OAR	Agency Tracking No: 2115.07
Title: NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHHH) (Proposed Rule)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular	Date Submitted to OIRA: 11/16/2020

	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2023	01/31/2023
Responses	102	182
Time Burden (Hours)	55,142	54,600
Cost Burden (Dollars)	988,583	907,000

---

Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHHH applies to new and existing facilities that: 1) manufacture a miscellaneous coating (including inks, paints, or adhesives described by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 285 or 289, or North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes 3255 or 3259), and 2) are either located at, or are part of, major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, and 3) process, use, or produce HAP, and 4) are not part of an affected source under another subpart of 40 CFR Part 63. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after April 4, 2002. As part of the RTR for the NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is not proposing to revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to require periodic air emissions testing to measure organic HAP destruction or removal efficiency at the inlet and outlet of the add-on control device, or control device outlet concentration of organic HAP, once every 5 years for existing and new surface coating affected sources using the emission rate with add-on controls compliance option. The EPA is proposing to revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) provisions of the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) rule and proposing the use of electronic data reporting for future performance test data submittals, notifications, and reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHHH. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any deviation from an emission limitation, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 44 USC 3501 et.seq Name of Law: Clean Air Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
2060-AU16	Proposed rulemaking	84 FR 46610	09/14/2019

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments

Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHHH)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Request	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	102	182	0	-80	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	55,142	54,600	0	542	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	988,583	907,000	0	81,583	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: There is an increase in the labor hours per respondent in this ICR as compared to the previous ICR. This situation is due to four considerations: 1) increased time in year one to become familiar with the amended rules, 2) increased time in year one to re-evaluating previously developed SSM record systems, 3) increased time in year one to become familiar with CEDRI and the electronic reporting form for the semiannual report, 4) increased time in years one to three for keeping records of operating hours and bypass hours; and 5) time required for conducting a performance test and reporting the results. There is an increase in the capital/startup costs as calculated. The requirement for periodic performance testing requires 12 existing facilities to conduct a performance test on 12 add-on control devices, with an estimate of one test being repeated. These facilities are not currently required to perform periodic testing as a condition of their part 70 operating permits.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $18,400

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Does this ICR request any personally identifiable information (see OMB Circular No. A-130 for an explanation of this term)? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Does this ICR include a form that requires a Privacy Act Statement (see 5 U.S.C. §552a(e)(3))? Please consult with your agency's privacy program when making this determination.     No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? No

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/16/2020

---