Regulation 14A (Commission Rules 14a-1 through 14a-21 and Schedule 14A)
Revision of a currently approved collection
No
Regular
12/03/2020
Requested
Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
05/31/2022
6,369
5,586
803,956
551,101
107,194,012
73,480,012
Schedule 14A is filed by issuers of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with solicitation of a proxy.
In the Adopting Release, the Commission revised its estimates for the total annual compliance burden resulting from the amendments, which were initially included in the Proposing Release. The change in the estimates for the final rules was primarily due to: (i) the Commissionâs decision to modify its original proposal by shifting to a less prescriptive, more principles-based approach with respect to new Rule 14a-2(b)(9); and (ii) the Commissionâs consideration of commentersâ views that the Commissionâs original burden estimates were too low.
Instead of the prescriptive review and response process for proxy voting advice that was proposed, under the final rules proxy voting advice businesses must meet certain principles-based conditions in Rule 14a-2(b)(9)(ii) in order to utilize certain exemptions from the information and filing requirements of the proxy rules. These conditions include the adoption and public disclosure by proxy voting businesses of written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) the proxy voting advice is made available to registrants at or prior to the time when such advice is disseminated to the proxy voting advice businessâs clients; and (ii) that the proxy voting advice business provides clients with a mechanism by which they can reasonably be expected to become aware of a registrantâs written statement about the proxy voting advice in a timely manner.
It appears that the more prescriptive nature of the proposed amendments was a large driver of the hourly and cost burdens discussed by commenters. We believe the flexibility afforded by the principles-based approach reflected in the final amendments should therefore result in lower costs from what commenters had estimated based on the proposed amendments. Furthermore, we believe that some proxy voting advice businesses may already have systems in place sufficient to comply with significant features of the final rules, which would be expected to limit their overall burden. Nonetheless, in consideration of some commentersâ views that the Commissionâs original calculations had greatly underestimated the impact on paperwork burden, the Commission adjusted its estimates upward with respect to certain aspects of the new rules.
The Commission also included in its revised estimates the additional hourly and cost burdens associated with certain other aspects of the final rules that were not originally reflected in the proposed amendments, such as that related to a proxy voting advice businessâs securing an acknowledgment or other assurance from registrants that their receipt of the proxy advice is subject to use restrictions.
For purposes of its Paperwork Reduction Act analysis, the Commission estimates that the final amendments to Regulation 14A would result in a net increase of 252,855 burden hours and net increase of $33,714,000 in cost burden.
See Supporting Statement Question 15 for more details.
$103,479,690
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Dan Greenspan 202 551-3623
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.