Download:
pdf |
pdfPage 1 of 5
Print Date: 12/11/20
Title:
Restaurant Employee Health Policy Study
Project Id:
0900f3eb81a574d9
Accession #:
NCEH-FT-11/1/19-574d9
Project Contact:
Kramer_Adam (ank5)
Organization:
NCEH/ATSDR/DEHSP/WFEHSB/FT
Status:
Pending Clearance : PRA Revision
Intended Use:
Project Determination
Estimated Start Date:
12/02/2019
Estimated Completion Date:
09/29/2020
CDC/ATSDR HRPO/IRB Protocol #:
OMB Control #:
0920-1227
Determinations
Determination
Justification
HSC:
Does NOT Require HRPO
Review
Research Not Involving Human Subjects
Entered By & Role
12/11/20
Davis_Stephanie I. (sgd8) CIO HSC
12/11/20
Davis_Stephanie I. (sgd8) CIO OMB / PRA
10/17/20
Vann_Jerrell A. (jiv4) HRPO Reviewer
9/30/20
Zirger_Jeffrey (wtj5) ICRO Reviewer
45 CFR 46.102(e)
PRA:
PRA Applies
HRPO:
HRPO/IRB Approves
Completed
HRPO/IRB decision date: 10/7/20
IRB Expiration date: 12/31/30
ICRO:
Returned with No
Decision
Description & Funding
Description
Priority:
Standard
Date Needed:
12/02/2019
Determination Start Date:
11/18/20
Description:
This study will be conducted by the Environmental Health Specialists Network (EHS-Net) program, a collaborative
project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and eight local and state public health departments (Franklin County
[Ohio], New York, New York City [New York], Minnesota, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Southern Nevada Health District
[Nevada], and Harris County [Texas]). This is an EHS-Net intervention study designed to assess whether an
educational intervention will result in restaurants either developing or modifying their sick worker management
plans. The study will occur in randomly selected restaurants in the EHS-Net sites. The study will use a quasiexperimental pre- and post-test design. The study will include two randomly assigned groups (intervention and
control). Each of the eight EHS-Net sites will collect data in twenty restaurants in each group for a total of 320
restaurants. In both the intervention and the control groups, data collectors will conduct an initial site visit in which
they will interview the manager and observe food safety practices within the restaurant. Then, on this same visit,
the restaurants in the intervention group will receive an educational intervention comprised of an explanation of the
need to develop sick worker management plans and a toolkit (with sample policies). The restaurants in the control
group will not receive this intervention at this time. Three to six months later, the intervention and control
restaurants will be visited again, and a similar data collection will occur. At this second visit, the intervention will be
provided to control restaurants. If the intervention is successful, based on either the development or modification
of restaurant sick worker policies, a telephonic follow up interview will occur with previous control restaurants to
see if their policies have changed.
IMS/CIO/Epi-Aid/Chemical Exposure
Submission:
No
IMS Activation Name:
Not selected
Primary Priority of the Project:
Not selected
Secondary Priority(s) of the Project:
Not selected
Task Force Associated with the Response:
Not selected
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81c... 12/11/2020
Page 2 of 5
CIO Emergency Response Name:
Not selected
Epi-Aid Name:
Not selected
Assessment of Chemical Exposure Name:
Not selected
Goals/Purpose
Examine whether an educational intervention will result in restaurants either creating or modifying their sick worker
management plans. Sick food workers are the leading source of norovirus outbreaks attributed to restaurants.
These plans can help restaurants prevent sick workers from working and consequently reduce outbreaks.
Objective:
The objective of the study is to determine if an educational intervention leads restaurants to create or improve their
sick worker management plans.
Activities or Tasks:
New Collection of Information, Data, or Biospecimens
Target Populations to be
Included/Represented:
Other
Tags/Keywords:
Food Services, Sick food worker
CDC's Role:
CDC employees will participate as co-authors in presentation(s) or publication(s), CDC employees will provide
substantial technical assistance or oversight, CDC is providing funding
Method Categories:
Individual Interviews (Qualitative); Observation
Methods:
Data collectors (EHS-Net site staff which are experienced food safety professionals) will interview restaurant
managers about: restaurant policies around sick food workers and preventing illness transmission; their
demographics; and their beliefs about sick food workers. Data collectors will also collect observation data in the
restaurant kitchen on implementation of practices designed to prevent illness transmission from a sick food worker.
Collection of Info, Data or Biospecimen:
Information will be obtained through interview and observation.
Expected Use of Findings/Results:
The findings will be used to inform public health practice in developing interventions to keep sick food workers from
working.
Could Individuals potentially be identified
based on Information Collected?
No
Funding
Funding Type
Funding Title
Funding #
Original Budget Yr
# Years Award
CDC Cooperative Agreement
Environmental Health Specialists Network
EH20-001
2020
5
HSC Review
Suggested level of IRB review
Expedited review is suggested
Yes
1a - Study of drugs not requiring
Investigational New Drug exemption from
FDA
No Selection
1b - Study of medical devices not requiring
Investigational Device Exemption from FDA
No Selection
2a - Collection of blood from healthy, nonpregnant adults; below volume and
frequency limits, minimally invasive
No Selection
2b - Collection of blood from other adults
and children; below volume and frequency
limits, minimally invasive
No Selection
3 - Prospective noninvasive collection of
biological specimens for research purposes
No Selection
4 - Collection of data through routine,
noninvasive procedures, involving no
general anesthesia, sedation, x-rays, or
microwaves
No Selection
5 - Research that uses previously collected
materials
No Selection
6 - Collection of data from voice, video,
digital, or image recordings made for
research purposes
No Selection
7 - Research that uses interview, program
evaluation, human factors, or quality
assurance methods
Yes
HSC Attributes
Non-Human/Non-Animal Material
Yes
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81c... 12/11/2020
Page 3 of 5
Other - This is a research study about
Yes
restaurant food safety policies and practices
and not human subjects.
Additional Ethical
Considerations
This is a re-determination of research study
previously reviewed and approved as CDC
Protocol 7261 (Restaurant Employee Health Policy
Study). The PI is Dr. Adam Kramer (ank5). After
careful deliberation of the research aims, it has
been determined that this protocol is "research
not involving identifiable human subjects" and
will not require IRB review. This is a research
study about restaurant food safety policies and
practices and not about human subjects.
Regulation and Policy
Do you anticipate this project will be
submitted to the IRB office
No
Estimated number of study participants
Population - Children
N/A
Population - Minors
N/A
Population - Prisoners
N/A
Population - Pregnant Women
N/A
Population - Emancipated Minors
N/A
Suggested level of risk to subjects Do you anticipate this project will be exempt research or non-exempt research
Requested consent process waviers
Informed consent for adults
No Selection
Children capable of providing assent
No Selection
Parental permission
No Selection
Alteration of authorization under HIPPA
Privacy Rule
No Selection
Requested Waivers of Documentation of Informed Consent
Informed consent for adults
No Selection
Children capable of providing assent
No Selection
Parental permission
No Selection
Consent process shown in an understandable language
Reading level has been estimated
No Selection
Comprehension tool is provided
No Selection
Short form is provided
No Selection
Translation planned or performed
No Selection
Certified translation / translator
No Selection
Translation and back-translation to/from
target language(s)
No Selection
Other method
No Selection
Clinical Trial
Involves human participants
No Selection
Assigned to an intervention
No Selection
Evaluate the effect of the intervention
No Selection
Evaluation of a health related biomedical or
behavioral outcome
No Selection
Registerable clinical trial
No Selection
Other Considerations
No Selection
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81c... 12/11/2020
Page 4 of 5
Exception is requested to PHS informing
those bested about HIV serostatus
Human genetic testing is planned now or in
the future
No Selection
Involves long-term storage of identfiable
biological specimens
No Selection
Involves a drug, biologic, or device
No Selection
Conducted under an Investigational New
Drug exemption or Investigational Device
Exemption
No Selection
Institutions & Staff
Institutions
Name
FWA #
FWA Exp Date
IRB Title
IRB Exp Date
Franklin County Public Health
Funding #
EH20-001
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention
FWA00001413
10/31/24
Harris County Public Hlth & Environmental Services
FWA00009349
12/11/19
EH20-001
Minnesota Department of Health
FWA00000072
03/24/22
EH20-001
New York City Dept of Hlth & Mental Hygiene
FWA00009459
08/06/25
EH20-001
New York State Dept of Hlth
FWA00003700
10/01/25
EH20-001
Rhode Island Department of Health
FWA00006141
09/09/25
Southern Nevada Health District
FWA00023704
10/23/24
EH20-001
Tennessee Department of Health
FWA00000379
02/07/22
EH20-001
RHODE ISLAND STE DEPT HLTH IRB #1
04/03/22
EH20-001
Staff
Staff
Member
SIQT Exp.
Date
Adam
Kramer
05/31/2022
Laura
Brown
12/20/2021
CITI
Biomedical
Exp. Date
CITI Social &
Behavioral Exp.
Date
CITI Good
Clinical Practice
Exp. Date
Staff Role
Email
Phone
Organization
12/31/2022
Principal
Investigator
[email protected]
4044981228
FOOD
12/20/2021
CoInvestigator
[email protected]
770488-2
WATER FOOD AND
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
SERVICES BRANCH
Data
DMP
Proposed Data Collection Start Date:
12/2/19
Proposed Data Collection End Date:
9/29/20
Proposed Public Access Level:
Public
Public Access Justification:
The dataset may have identifying information if combined with other data that could lead to the identification of the
restaurant and potentially to the person responding to the survey. Specific fields would not be allowed to be
released to protect the privacy of the respondents.
How Access Will Be Provided for Data:
Data will be released in aggregate format. Any non-aggregated data will have EHS-Net site identifiers and any
other potential identifiers omitted from release.
Plans for Archival and Long Term
Preservation:
Spatiality
Spatiality (Geographic Locations) yet to be added .....
Dataset
Dataset
Title
Dataset
Description
Data
Publisher/Owner
Public Access
Justification
External
Access URL
Download
URL
Type of Data
Released
Collection
Start Date
Collection
End Date
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81c... 12/11/2020
Page 5 of 5
Public
Access
Level
Dataset yet to be added...
https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSummary.action?docId=0900f3eb81c... 12/11/2020
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | https://publishing.cdc.gov/eclearance/printProjectClearanceSumm |
Author | sgd8 |
File Modified | 2020-12-11 |
File Created | 2020-12-11 |