ombrocisCAMPUS2021supportstatement

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission
Semi-annual Progress Report for the Grants to Reduce Violent Crimes Against
Women on Campus Program
A. Justification
1.

Statutorily-Mandated Need for Information

The Higher Education Amendments of 1998 originally created the Grants to Combat
Violent Crimes Against Women on Campuses Program (renamed the Grants to Reduce Violent
Crimes Against Women on Campus Program in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of
2000 (Campus Program)). 34 U.S.C. 20125 Campus Program grant funds may be used to
enhance victim services and develop programs to prevent violent crimes against women on
campuses. The Campus Program also enables institutions of higher education to develop and
strengthen effective security and investigation strategies to combat violent crimes against women
on campuses, including domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Currently, there are different statutory and regulatory reporting requirements that affect
Campus Program grantees. VAWA 2000 requires all VAWA grantees, including Campus
Program grantees, to report on the effectiveness of their programs to the Attorney General who,
in turn, must report to Congress every two years. Section 1003 of VAWA 2000 states that
(a) REPORT BY GRANT RECIPIENTS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of
Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall require grantees under any
program authorized or reauthorized by this division or an amendment made by
this division to report on the effectiveness of the activities carried out with
amounts made available to carry out that program, including number of persons
served, if applicable, numbers of persons seeking services who could not be
served and such other information as the Attorney General or Secretary may
prescribe.
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of
Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall report biennially to the
Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the
Senate on the grant programs described in subsection (a), including the
information contained in any report under that subsection.
34 U.S.C. 10238.
OVW must also comply with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
(GPRA) (Pub. L. 103-62) which was enacted to increase Congressional and Administrative focus
on the results from government programs and activities. To meet its GPRA reporting obligations
1

and elicit more meaningful information about grantee performance, OVW has recently developed
performance measures, including output measures, regarding which the Campus Program
grantees must report on an annual basis.
2.

Use of Information

OVW uses data from the information collection 1 in different ways. OVW will use the
information collected from Campus Program grantees to monitor their grant-funded activities and
qualitatively assess those activities. In particular, OVW is seeking data that includes baseline
information to review activities supported with Campus Program funds, including, for example,
an increase in the number of trainings or an increase in the number of victims served. OVW will
review semiannual progress report to monitor individual Campus Program grantee’s performance
and ensure that the goals and objectives set forth in applications for funding and award
documents are met.
The Campus Program grantees collect information that addresses the following grant-funded
activities (different sections on the reporting form): staff, statutory purpose areas, informational
materials, and victim services. Narrative questions at the end of these different sections enable
grantees to give more detailed qualitative information about their grant-funded activities. In
addition, Campus Program grantees must answer narrative questions on the most significant
areas of remaining need with regard to improving services to victims/survivors of sexual assault,
increasing victims/survivors safety, and enhancing community response (including offender
accountability or sex offenders), what has Campus Program funding allowed the grantee to do
that the grantee could not do prior to receiving funding, additional information about the Campus
Program grant and/or the effectiveness of the grant and any additional information about the data
submitted.
In addition to the proposed information collection, OVW will continue to use a number of
other techniques to assess the performance of Campus Program grantees. These may include
OVW staff attendance at site visits, grant-funded training and technical assistance events, staff
review of products prior to dissemination, and ongoing consultation with OVW staff.
OVW will aggregate data from all Campus Program grantees’ progress reports to assess the
performance of the Campus Program as a whole and to respond to Congressional, Department of
Justice, and other inquiries about how Campus Program funds are being used. In addition,
information collected from Campus Program grantees will support the following OVW GPRA
measures:
1 Under a cooperative agreement between OVW and the University of Southern Maine’s
Muskie School of Public Service, data collected from OVW grantees on all of OVW’s progress
report forms is transmitted to the Muskie School for analysis. For the analysis of the data,
standard descriptive statistics (frequency, sum, percentage, mean, etc.) are used to describe the
characteristics of the grantees and report basic findings. All analyses are conducted in SPSS 13.0.
2

Number of victims receiving requested services;
Percentage of victims requesting services who received them;
Number of protection orders issued;
Number of grant-funded multidisciplinary training events that have occurred;
Number of professionals trained to respond to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault
and stalking;
Number of policies developed/revised; and
Number of communities with improved Community Coordinated Response.
Information collected from Campus Program grantees will enable OVW to respond to statutory
requirements to report on the effectiveness of grant-funded activities. The 2018 Measuring
Effectiveness Report to Congress, which includes information about how funds were expended
and an assessment of the effectiveness of funded programs- see
https://www.justice.gov/ovw/reports-congress. This report is based on data submitted Campus
Program grantees reflecting Campus Program awards made and Campus Program‐funded
activities engaged in during calendar years July 1, 2015- June 30, 2017. OVW is in the process of
submitting the 2020 Report to Congress.
The data that OVW collects on the semiannual progress reporting forms is currently not used
in connection with an evaluation of the Campus Program. OVW is currently exploring the
development of a multi-layered evaluation agenda for its grant programs.
3.

Use of Information Technology

The collection of information will involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. OVW
grantees are required to submit semiannual progress reports through the JustGrants system.
4.

Duplication of Information Request

There is no other mechanism by which OVW collects information about grant funded
activities including number of victims served, victims seeking services who could not be served,
or persons trained.
5.

Impact on Small Entities

There is no impact on small entities as the collection of this type of information is
routinely kept by most grantees receiving funds under the Campus Program.
6.

Consequences to Federal Programs or Policy
By statute, Congress has mandated that Campus Program grantees report to the Attorney
3

General on the effectiveness of their activities funded under VAWA. If OVW was not able to
collect the information necessary to complete these reports on behalf of the Attorney General, not
only would it be failing to meet a statutorily required reporting mandate, but also the existence of
this important and necessary grant program could be jeopardized.
7.

Special Circumstances

There are no special circumstances as identified in the specific instructions for a
supporting statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.
8.

Federal Register Publication

OVW has consulted with persons outside the agency who have advised that the data
proposed to be collected is available, the semiannual collection of such data is not burdensome,
the form is clear, and that the information is routinely kept by most grantees receiving funds
under the Campus Program. OVW has solicited public comment on this form in accordance with
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. A 60 day notice was published in the Federal
Register on November 24, 2020 (Federal Register, Volume 85, page 75037) and a 30-day was
notice was published in the Federal Register on January , 2021 (Federal Register, Volume , page
). OVW received no public comments.
9.

Payment or Gift to Respondents
There will no payment or gift to respondents.

10.

Confidentiality

Although this information is needed for a public report to Congress, it will not involve
any personal information about victims that could identify them as specific individuals.
However, anecdotal, non-identifying information about the effectiveness of individual programs
may be included in the report. There is no assurance to confidentiality.
11.

Specific Questions

The semiannual progress report will not contain any questions of a personal, sensitive
nature such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are
commonly considered private.
12.

Hour Burden of the Collection of Information

This semi-annual progress report is not overly burdensome. The data collection tool will
be completed by approximately 100 Campus Program grantees twice a year. There will be 200
semi-annual responses and it is estimated that it will take grantees no more than 1 hour to
4

complete the progress report form. Thus, the annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden is
200 hours. Campus Program grantees are informed about the reporting requirements during the
grant solicitation process and during the grant award process.
OVW is seeking basic information that is routinely kept by the grantees in the normal
course of their operations. Thus, the requirement that grantees complete this progress report
within a period of less than 30 days after receipt of it is not overly burdensome. OVW estimates
that it will take approximately 1 hour for a grantee to complete the form. OVW developed this
estimate based on the fact that information of this nature is already kept by grantees receiving
funds under the Campus Program and that the grantees have been apprized of these reporting
requirements during the solicitation process and reminded throughout the grant award process.
The progress report is divided into sections that pertain to the different types of activities that
grantees may engage in, i.e. training, product development, victim services. Grantees will only
have to complete the sections of the form that relate to their specific grant-funded activities.

13.

Cost Burden of the Collection of Information

OVW does not believe that there is any annual cost burden on respondents or
recordkeepers resulting from the collection of this information.
14.

Annualized Costs to the Federal Government

The annualized costs to the Federal Government resulting from the OVW staff review of
the progress reports submitted by grantees are estimated to be $11,200.
15.

Program Changes or Adjustments

There are no program changes or adjustments for the estimates identified in Section 13
and in Section 14. This is a information collection that is necessary for OVW and its Campus
Program grantees to comply with the statutory reporting requirements and the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-62).
16.

Published Results of Information Collections

There will be no complex analytical techniques used in connection with the publication of
information collected under the request. Information will be gathered once a year at the end of
the reporting periods. OVW is statutorily required to submit a report on the effectiveness of all
grant-funded activities on a biennial basis.
17.

Display of the Expiration Date of OMB Approval
5

OVW will display the Expiration Date of OMB Approval in the upper right hand corner
of the Progress Report.
18.

Exception to the Certification Statement

OVW is not seeking any exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19,
Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions, of OMB Form 83-I.

6