Supporting Statement-1105-NEW-Form USM-649-Completed

Supporting Statement-1105-NEW-Form USM-649-Completed.docx

Form USM-649, Vulnerability Assessment Request

OMB: 1105-0110

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions


Each information collection request must include a supporting statement outlining the justification for the proposed collection. Completed supporting statement documents must include both the questions below and the component’s answers, even if a question is not applicable. If selecting “Yes” on question 17 of OMB Form 83-I or if selecting in ROCIS that the collection will employ statistical methods, then Part B of the Supporting Statement must also be completed.

  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The information must be collected in order for federal, state, local, and tribal government agencies to request a vulnerability assessment of a government facility by the United States Marshals Service (USMS). The USMS seeks to complete these vulnerability assessment requests in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Justice Strategic Plan which directs the USMS to strengthen “collaborative efforts with other federal agencies, states and localities, tribal governments, community groups, foreign countries, and others (DOJ Strategic Plan, 9).”


Per the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 566, it is the primary role and mission of the USMS to provide for the security of the United States Courts. As such, the USMS maintains the knowledge and expertise that is essential to assist federal, state, local and tribal government agencies in securing their facilities against various potential threats.



  1. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The information provided will be used to determine the scope of the vulnerability assessment request, and whether the USMS will accept or decline the request. This will further allow the USMS to identify the number of personnel, amount of time, and special considerations required to complete the request.


  1. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.


The form will be a fillable electronic PDF form that can be submitted electronically to USMS district offices. The form may be converted into a browser-enabled form as our agency moves forward with implementing new technologies we are beginning to gain access to.


  1. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


There is no existing form that is used by agencies to request a vulnerability assessment from USMS.


  1. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.


This form will not be utilized by small businesses or entities.


  1. Describe the consequence to the Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


If this information were not collected it would require agencies to request a vulnerability assessment by emailing their local USMS district office, which would result in a lot more back and forth in order to understand what the agency needs. The form allows USMS to determine the requirements much more efficiently and consistently.


  1. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with OMB guidelines: (a) requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly; (b) requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it; (c) requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document; (d) requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years; (e) in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study; (f) requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB; (g) that includes a pledge of confidentially that is not supported by authority established in stature of regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; (h) requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


Information will not be collected in a way that is inconsistent with OMB guidelines.


  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years - even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


The Department solicited comments on the information collection in FR Volume 85, Number 246, page 83615 (December 22, 2020) and FR Volume 84, Number 112, page 27162 (June 11, 2019). The comment period for the proposed rule has closed and the Department received no comments on the information collection.


  1. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


The Department has made no decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents.


  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


Information provided by agencies on this form will be for USMS use and reviewed for law enforcement purposes only. We are seeking for this form the have the appropriate “UNCLASSIFIED / / LES” markings to relay USMS intent to safeguard all information provided.


  1. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


The Department is not requesting such information.


  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

    • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

    • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.

    • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.


The Department estimates the number of minutes necessary to submit a request to be approximately 30 per responder, with approximately 20 possible responders. In order to calculate the public burden, the Department multiplied 30 by 20, which equals 600. Divide by 60 (the number of minutes in an hour) to total 10 annual burden hours associated with this collection. The burden was estimated based on observing how long it takes one of our staff to actually fill out the proposed form.


  1. Provide an estimate for the total annual cost burden to respondents or record-keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14)


There should be no cost burden on the respondent to complete this request.


  1. The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.

    • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

    • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made:

      • Prior to October 1, 1995,

      • To achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection,

      • For reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or

      • As part of customary and usual business or private practices.


No such costs are associated with this collection.


  1. Provide estimates of annualized costs to the Federal government. Also provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies may also aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


USMS staff time to process and document requests: 1 GS-13 ($61.09/hour) * (1 hr/week maintenance per year) TOTAL $3,236.68.


  1. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.


N/A


  1. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


N/A


  1. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


N/A


  1. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19,"Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions," of OMB Form 83-I.


N/A


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorLynn Bryant
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-04-22

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy