0349 2022 Ss (20220329)

0349 2022 SS (20220329).docx

Lacey Act Declaration Requirement; Plants and Plant Products

OMB: 0579-0349

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

April 2022


Supporting Statement

Lacey Act Declaration Requirement; Plants and Plant Products

OMB No. 0579-0349


A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection.


The Lacey Act, first enacted in 1900 and significantly amended in 1988, is the United States’ oldest wildlife protection statute. The Act combats trafficking in “illegal” wildlife, fish, or plants. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, which took effect May 22, 2008, amended the Lacey Act by expanding its protection to a broader range of plants and plant products (Section 8204. Prevention of Illegal Logging Practices). As of May 22, 2008, the Lacey Act made it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce any plant, with some limited exceptions, taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of the laws of the United States, a State, an Indian tribe, or any foreign law that protects plants. The Lacey Act also makes it unlawful to make or submit any false record, account, or label for, or any false identification of, any plant covered by the Act.


In addition, Section 3 of the Lacey Act, (16 U.S.C. 3372), makes it unlawful for importers to import certain plants and plant products without submitting an import declaration. The declaration must contain, among other things, the scientific name of the plant, value of the importation, quantity of the plant, and name of the country from which the plant was harvested.


For paper and paperboard products with recycled plant content, the importer will not be required to specify the species or country of harvest with respect to the recycled plant product component but will be required to provide the average percent of recycled content. If the product also contains non-recycled plant materials, the basic declaration requirements still apply to that component of the product imported. Paper and paper products (HTS Chapters 47, 48, and 49) do not currently require declaration, but this provision has been made for future implementation.


APHIS is asking OMB to approve, for an additional 3 years, the use of this information collection activity associated with its efforts to combat the illegal harvest and trade of natural resources entering the United States.



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


APHIS uses the information from plant declarations to ensure compliance with the Lacey Act declaration requirements and to support Lacey Act enforcement efforts of investigating and prosecuting partner government agencies.

Plant and Plant Product Declaration (PPQ Form 505); (Business)

Importers will have to submit a declaration for all plants containing the scientific name of the plant, value of the importation, quantity of the plant, and name of country from which the plant was harvested. If the species vary or are unknown, importers will have to declare the name of each species that may have been used to produce the product.


The purpose for collecting this information is to reduce and prevent illegal logging practices around the world. This information is being collected by the Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency electronically for APHIS via the Automated Commercial Environment, by APHIS’ Lacey Act Web Governance System, and via hard copy filing through the mail for those importers who do not have access electronic filing systems. This information is used to support audits and investigations into illegal logging practices by federal enforcement partners, and also acts as a deterrent to illegal logging practices worldwide. The data also support program reviews of declarations to identify non-compliance and software design changes to further streamline the submission process.


Plant and Plant Product Declaration Supplemental (PPQ Form 505B); (Business)

This supplemental form is to provide the filer additional space to enter the required information, if needed. Most declarations will require only one page which will be the PPQ 505. However, in some cases of large and/or complicated shipments, a PPQ 505B will allow the importer to append the information without needing to repeat the shipping information. This supplemental form can be used as many times as necessary to complete the required information for each shipment. This form will only be used when the PPQ 505 does not provide enough space for the filer. For paper and paperboard products with recycled content, the importer will not be required to specify the species or country of harvest but will be required to provide the average percent of recycles content. Paper and paper products (HTS Chapters 47, 48, and 49) do not currently require declaration, but this provision has been made for future implementation.


Recordkeeping of Declaration Forms; (Business)

Records of the Plant and Plant Production Declaration Form and Supplemental Form (PPQ 505 and PPQ 505B) must be kept for at least 5 years. The records must be made available to APHIS for review upon request.


Importers/Stakeholders Letters of Inquiry; (Business)

The public may also send inquiries about specific taxa or commodities and requests to add taxa or commodities to the list, or remove them from the list, by writing to The Lacey Act, ATT: Common Cultivar/Common Food Crop, c/o U.S. Department of Agriculture, Box 10, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD 20737 or by email to [email protected] and including the following information:


  • Scientific name of the plant (genus, species);

  • Common or trade names;

  • Annual trade volume (e.g., cubic meters) or weight (e.g., metric tons/kilograms) of the commodity; and

  • Any other information that will help make a determination, such as countries or regions where grown, estimated number of acres or hectares in commercial production, and so on.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


At the present time, approximately 98 percent of the Lacey Act information is being collected electronically. The remaining 2 percent is being collected via the mailing of the original copy of the forms directly to APHIS. With the hard copy, the importer needs to complete the form, print it, and mail it. The forms are fillable PDF format and can be saved for updating subsequent submissions to APHIS.


The form information can be submitted by the public three different ways, two of which are electronic: (1) the Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) electronically collects these forms for APHIS with the Automated Commercial Environment; and (2) APHIS’ Lacey Act Web Governance System (LAWGS) which allows importers to file the form information electronically (the registration information collection is accounted for in OMB Control Number 0503-0014, “USDA Registration Form to Request Electronic Access Code”). APHIS developed this system to reduce the amount of information that is submitted via hard copy and to streamline the filing process. LAWGS can be viewed at https://lawgs.aphis.usda.gov/lawgs. Importers who do not have access to either of the other two electronic filing systems can file a hard copy through the mail to APHIS.


The PPQ Form 505 and PPQ Form 505B are both posted on the APHIS Electronic Forms Library website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/library/forms/pdf/ppq505.pdf and https://www.aphis.usda.gov/library/forms/pdf/ppq505b.pdf, in addition to the LAWSG website at https://lawgs.aphis.usda.gov/lawgs.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purpose described in item 2 above.


The information APHIS collects is exclusive to its mission by expanding its protection to a broader range of plants and plant products within the United States and it is not available from any other source.




5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


APHIS estimates that approximately 80 percent of the business respondents in this information collection are small entities. The information APHIS collects is the minimum needed to ensure that plant and plant product importations are in compliance with the Lacey Act requirements.



6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Failure to submit the PPQ Form 505 will result in a direct violation of the Lacey Act as amended under The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. The statute states in Title 16 USC Chapter 53, Section 3372(f)(1) “… it shall be unlawful for any person to import any plant unless the person files upon importation a declaration ….” APHIS was designated as the agency responsible for collecting and enforcing the declaration requirement. It needs the declaration data to conduct data analysis and evaluate risk to generate reports, perform compliance, and develop policy. The agency uses the PPQ Form 505 information to identify levels of risk for imported shipments and to identify erroneous entries for Lacey Act regulated products. This helps APHIS to provide stakeholder outreach and improve compliance. If APHIS does not collect the data, it would not be able to send reports and referrals to interagency federal partners for investigations and prosecutions. This could hinder enforcement of the Lacey Act.



7. Explain any special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than 3 years;


The Plant and Plant Product Declaration and Supplemental Form (PPQ 505 and PPQ 505B) must be maintained for a minimum of 5 years. This recordkeeping will provide APHIS with historical documentation to ensure that accurate records are being maintained to verify that businesses are not in violation of the Lacey Act.


  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


There are no other special circumstances associated with this information collection. This collection is conducted in a manner consistent with the guidelines established in 5 CFR 1320.5.



8. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting form, and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


APHIS’ Lacey Act Program conducted ongoing presentations and outreach with stakeholders to clarify the scope of the declaration requirements. This provided useful information to members of the wooden pallet and container associations, wood products associations, music industry, and herbal product and fragrance industry. The agency exchanged emails and participated in webinars, teleconferences, and individual phone calls to discuss the required fields on the declaration form and filing methods.


APHIS engaged in productive consultations with numerous importers regarding reporting of scientific names of plant species in composite products. It participated on a wood factory tour coordinated by a U.S. wood products association to visit several factories to discuss reporting requirements for composite and recycled products. The agency explained to importers that they can use special use designations to declare the plant names for products that may be categorized by genus or species into common trade groups, or that contain composite, recycled, reused, or reclaimed materials or products manufactured prior to the passage of the Lacey Act amendments. This provides relief for the trade community and fulfills the reporting requirements of the Lacey Act.


APHIS has been engaged in virtual meetings and telephone discussions with the following individuals regarding reporting requirements for the scientific name of the plants, value of the importation, quantity of the plants, and name of country from which the plants were harvested. No significant concerns were raised regarding how frequently or how much data is collected; the convenience and clarity of reporting formats and other collection instruments; and the clarity of, and necessity for, any recordkeeping requirements.


Cindy Squires, Esq.

Executive Director

International Wood Products Association

4214 King Street, Alexandria VA 22302

Tel. 703-820-6696; Cell 703-489-5126


Brent J. McClendon, CAE

President and CEO

National Wooden Pallet and Container Association

Tel. 703-519-6104 x 201; Cell 703-314-3633


Michael McGuffin, President

American Herbal Products Association

Tel: 301-588-1171 x201; Cell 240-460-4457


On Monday, May 3, 2021, APHIS published in the Federal Register (86 FR 23342) a 60‑day notice seeking public comments on its plans to request a 3‑year approval of this collection of information. No comments from the public were received.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than re‑enumeration of contractors or grantees.


This information collection activity involves no payments or gifts to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


No additional assurance of confidentiality is provided with this information collection. Any
and all information obtained in this collection shall not be disclosed except in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a.


APHIS’s FOIA office advises that placing a confidentiality statement on the Lacey Act forms (PPQ 505 and PPQ 505B) will give the impression that all information will be protected by FOIA when, in fact, FOIA makes decisions regarding FOIA requests on a case-by-case basis.



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and others that are considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


This information collection activity asks no questions of a personal or sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated.


Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


See APHIS Form 71 for hour burden estimates.


Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burden for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.


APHIS estimates the total annualized cost to these respondents to be $24,482,238. APHIS arrived at this figure by multiplying the hours of estimated response time (481,778 hours) by the estimated average hourly wage of the above respondents ($35.07) and then multiplying the result by 1.449 to capture benefit costs.


In the previous submission, the management SOCC 11-0000 was erroneously used for average wages. For this renewal, the hourly rates accurately reflect the occupations that would perform the activities in this information collection to be importers and brokers ($34.80, SOCC 13-1020 (buyers and purchasing agents)); and sales representatives, wholesale and manufacturing, except technical and scientific products (35.34, SOCC 41-4012). The rate were found at the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm.


According to DOL BLS news release USDL-21-0437 released March 18, 2021, employee benefits account for 31 percent of employee costs, and wages account for the remaining 69 percent. Mathematically, total costs can be calculated as a function of wages using a multiplier of 1.449.



13. Provide estimates of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information (do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14). The cost estimates should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component annualized over its expected useful life; and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component.


No annual cost burden is associated with capital and startup costs, operation and maintenance expenditures, and purchase of services.




14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Provide a description of the method used to estimate cost and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


See APHIS Form 79. The estimated cost to the Federal Government is $33,332,302.



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-1.



Requested

Program Change Due to New Statute

Program Change Due to Agency Discretion

Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate

Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA

Previously Approved

Annual Number of Responses

986,854

0

285,665

0

0

703,189

Annual Time Burden (Hr)

481,778

0

142,788

0

0

338,990


This request for renewal is for 986,854 estimated responses and 481,778 estimated burden hours, reflecting increases of 283,665 estimated responses and 142,788 hours of estimated burden from the previous renewal request.


Discretionary program changes resulted in an increase of 283,664 estimated responses and 142,788 estimated hours of burden. The increases in the estimated responses and estimated burden hours are due to APHIS adding new products to the enforcement schedule that require a declaration, and more accurately reflects the number of respondents who will respond and responses to this collection. The reporting time for the activity Importer/Stakeholders Letters of Inquiry has an increase of 1 estimated response and a decrease of .5 estimated hour per response, reducing the reporting time for this activity. This reduction is because this activity only needs to be performed by the respondent if an update or correction of the information originally provided has changed since they first filed PPQ Form 505.



16. For collections of information whose results are planned to be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication.


APHIS has no plans to tabulate or publish the information collected.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


APHIS will display the OMB approval expiration date on the forms.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act."

APHIS is able to certify compliance with all the provisions under the Act.


B. Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods.


Statistical methods are not used in this information collection.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created0000-00-00

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy