OMB #0970-0401
Exp. Date: 05/31/2021
Appendix A. Survey
Please take a few minutes to provide feedback about your experience with the Rigorous Evaluation Technical Assistance (RETA) team following the evaluation design review process, during the Evaluation TA calls, and through the analysis plan reviews. Your responses are anonymous and will be used for program improvement purposes only. Thank you for your time!
Are you a PREIS Grantee or Evaluator __________
or a Tribal PREP grantee or Evaluator _________?
For the questions below, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.
SD – I strongly disagree with this statement.
D – I disagree with this statement.
N – I neither agree nor disagree with this statement.
A – I agree with this statement.
SA – I strongly agree with this statement.
NA – Not applicable.
The Paperwork Reduction Act
Statement: This collection of information is voluntary and will be
used to collect information from program and evaluation leads to
assess the quality of the content and delivery of technical
assistance and suggestions for future technical assistance. Public
reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 15 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB number and expiration date for this collection are
OMB #: 0970-0401, Exp: 05/31/2021. Send comments regarding this
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to
Mathematica Policy Research; 1100 First Street, NE, 12th
Floor, Washington, DC 20002 or [email protected].
Please indicate your response to the following statements, which relate to the Evaluation Technical Assistance (TA) provided, including resources and tools.
|
||||||
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
|
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
|
SD |
D |
N |
A |
SA |
NA |
This final section provides an opportunity for you to provide more specific feedback on the Evaluation TA. Your candid feedback will help us improve future TA, and further strengthen areas that are currently working well.
17. What did you enjoy MOST about the technical assistance?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
18. What did you enjoy LEAST about the technical assistance?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
19. How can we improve the technical assistance for the future?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
20. Are there additional tools and/or resources that you believe would have been beneficial for your evaluation?
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Mccoy, Kathleen (ACF) (CTR) |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-05-10 |