SS_1218-0180_ Bloodborne Pathogens_07-20-21_ROCIS

SS_1218-0180_ Bloodborne Pathogens_07-20-21_ROCIS.docx

Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030)

OMB: 1218-0180

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Bloodborne Pathogens Standard

OMB Control Number 1218-0180

OMB Expiration Date: August 31, 2021


SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR THE

INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE

BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS STANDARD (29 CFR 1910.1030)1

OMB CONTROL NO. 1218-0180 (July 2021)


This ICR seeks to extend authorization for this collection without change.


A. JUSTIFICATION


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The main objective of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) is to “assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources” (29 U.S.C. 651). To achieve this objective, the OSH Act specifically authorizes “the development and promulgation of occupational safety and health regulations” (29 U.S.C. 651).


To protect employee health, the OSH Act authorizes the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop standards that provide for “monitoring or measuring employee exposure” to occupational hazards and “prescribe the type and frequency of medical examinations and other tests which shall be made available [by the employer] to employees exposed to such hazards in order to most effectively determine whether the health of such employees is adversely affected by such exposure” (29 U.S.C. 655). In addition, the OSH Act mandates that “[e]ach employer shall make, keep and preserve, and make available to the Secretary [of Labor] . . . such records regarding [his/her] activities relating to this Act as the Secretary . . . may prescribe by regulation as necessary or appropriate for the enforcement of this Act or for developing information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational accidents and illnesses” (29 U.S.C. 657). In addition, the OSH Act directs OSHA to “issue regulations requiring employers to maintain accurate records of employee exposure to potentially toxic materials or other harmful physical agents which are required to be monitored and measured," and further specifies that such regulations provide “for each employee or former employee to have access to such records as will indicate [their] own exposure to toxic materials or harmful physical agents” (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act states further that “[t]he Secretary . . . shall . . . prescribe such rules and regulations as [he/she] may deem necessary to carry out [his/her] responsibilities under this Act, including rules and regulations dealing with the inspection of an employer’s establishment” (29 U.S.C. 651).


Under the authority granted by the OSH Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA” or “Agency”) published a health standard governing employee exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens at 29 CFR 1910.1030, 1915.1030 (the “Standard”). The basis for this Standard is a determination by the Assistant Secretary for OSHA that occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens can result in infections. These pathogens include, but are not limited to, the hepatitis B virus or the human immunodeficiency virus. These infections can lead to serious clinical illness which may result in death. Additionally, on November 6, 2000, the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act (NSPA), was signed into law (Pub. L. 106-430), as a result of the growing concern over bloodborne pathogens exposures resulting from sharps injuries and in response to technological developments that increase employee protections. On January 18, 2001, OSHA published a Direct Final Rule to conform to the requirements of NSPA. The information collection requirements resulting from the NSPA include: modifying the existing requirements for revising and updating the exposure control plan; soliciting of employee input for selecting safer medical devices; and recordkeeping.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The information collection requirements contained in this Standard include a written exposure control plan, documentation of employees’ hepatitis B vaccinations and post exposure evaluations and follow-up medical visits, labeling, training records, recordkeeping and a sharps injury log. Information generated in accordance with these provisions provides the employer and the employee with means to provide protection from the adverse health effects associated with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens.


A. Exposure control plan (§ 1910.1030(c)(1))


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(i) - Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure2 as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure.



§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii) - The Exposure Control Plan shall contain at least the following elements:


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) - The exposure determination required by paragraph (c)(2),


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B) - The schedule and method of implementation for paragraphs (d) Methods of Compliance, (e) HIV and HBV Research Laboratories and Production Facilities, (f) Hepatitis B Vaccination and Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up, (g) Communication of Hazards to Employees, and (h) Recordkeeping, of this standard, and


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(C) - The procedure for the evaluation of circumstances surrounding exposure incidents as required by paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this standard.


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(iii) - Each employer shall ensure that a copy of the Exposure Control Plan is accessible to employees in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020(e).


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv) - The Exposure Control Plan shall be reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure. The review and update of such plans shall also:

§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(A) – Reflect changes in technology that eliminate or reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens; and


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B) - Document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure.


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(v) - An employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan shall solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and shall document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan.


§ 1910.1030(c)(1)(vi) - The Exposure Control Plan shall be made available to the Assistant Secretary and the Director upon request for examination and copying.


Purpose: The purpose of the Exposure Control Plan is to identify those tasks and procedures where occupational exposure may occur and to identify the positions whose duties include those tasks and procedures identified with occupational exposure. Additionally, this requirement is to assure that all new tasks and procedures are evaluated in order to determine whether they will result in occupational exposure. The review also assures evaluation and implementation of safer medical devices. Employee input into this process can serve to assist the employer in overcoming obstacles to the successful implementation of control measures.


Exposure determination (§ 1910.1030(c)(2)) - Each employer who has an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall prepare an exposure determination. This exposure determination shall contain the following:


§ 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(A) - A list of all job classifications in which all employees in those job classifications have occupational exposure;


§ 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(B) - A list of job classifications in which some employees have occupational exposure, and


§ 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(C) - A list of all tasks and procedures or groups of closely related task and procedures in which occupational exposure occurs and that are performed by employees in job classifications listed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (c)(2)(i)(B) of this standard.


Purpose: To assure that the workers who hold these job classifications are included in the training program, are provided with personal protective equipment, are provided with post exposure follow-up where appropriate, are included in the HBV vaccination program, and receive all other protection afforded by this standard.


B. Housekeeping (§ 1910.1030(d)(4))


General (§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(i)) - Employers shall ensure that the worksite is maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The employer shall determine and implement an appropriate written schedule for cleaning and method of decontamination based upon the location within the facility, type of surface to be cleaned, type of soil present, and tasks or procedures being performed in the area.


Purpose: Assist in ensuring that routine cleaning, as recommended by CDC, is performed and that the method of decontamination deemed appropriate by the employer is followed. Additionally, the workers can utilize the schedule to determine when such cleaning should be done and what method they should use to properly accomplish the task.


C. Laundry (§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv))


§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A) - Contaminated laundry shall be handled as little as possible with a minimum of agitation.


§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A)(2) - Contaminated laundry shall be placed and transported in bags or containers labeled or color-coded in accordance with paragraph (g)(1)(i) of this standard. When a facility utilizes Universal Precautions in the handling of all soiled laundry, alternative labeling or color-coding is sufficient if it permits all employees to recognize the containers as requiring compliance with Universal Precautions.


§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(C) - When a facility ships contaminated laundry off-site to a second facility which does not utilize Universal Precautions in the handling of all laundry, the facility generating the contaminated laundry must place such laundry in bags or containers which are labeled or color-coded in accordance with paragraph (g)(1)(i).


Purpose: Placing and transporting contaminated laundry in labeled or color-coded bags or containers prevents inadvertent exposure by warning employees of the bag/container’s contaminated contents.


D. HIV and HBV research laboratories and production facilities (§ 1910.1030(e))


§ 1910.1030(e)(2)(ii)(B) - Contaminated materials that are to be decontaminated at a site away from the work area shall be placed in a durable, leak proof, labeled or color-coded container that is closed before being removed from the work area.


§ 1910.1030(e)(2)(ii)(C) Access to the work area shall be limited to authorized persons. Written policies and procedures shall be established whereby only persons who have been advised of the potential biohazard, who meet any specific entry requirements, and who comply with all entry and exit procedures shall be allowed to enter the work areas and animal rooms.

§ 1910.1030(e)(2)(ii)(M) - A biosafety manual shall be prepared or adopted and periodically reviewed and updated at least annually or more often if necessary. Personnel shall be advised of potential hazards, shall be required to read instructions on practices and procedures, and shall be required to follow them.


Purpose: Placing and transporting contaminated materials in labeled or color-coded container prevents inadvertent exposure by warning workers of the container’s contaminated contents. Only those individuals who have met specialized training requirements have access to this work area. The biosafety manual serves as a reference and assists in preventing exposure by identifying hazards and practices and procedures to be followed. Periodic review and update assures that the manual reflects the work setting’s current hazards, practices, and procedures.


E. Hepatitis B vaccination and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up (§ 1910.1030(f))


§ 1910.1030(f)(1)(i) - The employer shall make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure, and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up to all employees who have had an exposure incident.


§ 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii) - The employer shall ensure that all medical evaluations and procedures including the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, including prophylaxis, are:


§ 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(A) - Made available at no cost to the employee.


§ 1910.1030(f)(1)(ii)(D) - Provided according to recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service current at the time these evaluations and procedures take place, except as specified by this paragraph (f).


Hepatitis B vaccination (§ 1910.1030(f)(2))


§ 1910.1030(f)(2)(i) - Hepatitis B vaccination shall be made available after the employee has received the training required in paragraph (g)(2)(vii)(I) and within 10 working days of initial assignment to all employees who have occupational exposure unless the employee has previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, antibody testing has revealed that the employee is immune, or the vaccine is contraindicated for medical reasons.


§ 1910.1030(f)(2)(iii) - If the employee initially declines hepatitis B vaccination but at a later date while still covered under the standard decides to accept the vaccination, the employer shall make available hepatitis B vaccination at that time.


§ 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv) - The employer shall assure that employees who decline to accept hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer sign the statement in Appendix A.


§ 1910.1030(f)(2)(v) - If a routine booster dose(s) of hepatitis B vaccine is recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service at a future date, such booster dose(s) shall be made available in accordance with section (f)(1)(ii).


Purpose: Hepatitis B vaccination is made available to eliminate or minimize risk of contracting hepatitis B through exposure, particularly when other controls inadequately protect or the worker is inadvertently or unknowingly exposed. Additionally, assures that workers who are initially reluctant to accept vaccination but who later change their minds as the result of information or experiences are accorded the opportunity to receive vaccination. The declination form encourages greater participation in the vaccination program by reiterating that a worker declining the hepatitis B vaccination remains at risk of acquiring hepatitis B. Also allows employers to easily determine who is not vaccinated so that resources can be directed toward improving the acceptance rate of the vaccination program, and assists compliance officers in enforcing training and vaccination requirements.


Post-exposure evaluation and follow-up (§ 1910.1030(f)(3)) - Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer shall make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation and follow-up, including at least the following elements:


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(i) - Documentation of the route(s) of exposure, and the circumstances under which the exposure incident occurred;


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii) - Identification and documentation of the source individual, unless the employer can establish that identification is infeasible or prohibited by state or local law;


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(A) - The source individual's blood shall be tested as soon as feasible and after consent is obtained in order to determine HBV and HIV infectivity. If consent is not obtained, the employer shall establish that legally required consent cannot be obtained. When the source individual's consent is not required by law, the source individual's blood, if available, shall be tested and the results documented.


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(B) - When the source individual is already known to be infected with HBV or HIV, testing for the source individual's known HBV or HIV status need not be repeated.


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(ii)(C) - Results of the source individual's testing shall be made available to the exposed employee, and the employee shall be informed of applicable laws and regulations concerning disclosure of the identity and infectious status of the source individual.


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(iii) - Collection and testing of blood for HBV and HIV serological status;


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(iii)(A) - The exposed employee's blood shall be collected as soon as feasible and tested after consent is obtained.


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(iii)(B) - If the employee consents to baseline blood collection, but does not give consent at that time for HIV serologic testing, the sample shall be preserved for at least 90 days. If, within 90 days of the exposure incident, the employee elects to have the baseline sample tested, such testing shall be done as soon as feasible.


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(iv) - Post-exposure prophylaxis, when medically indicated, as recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service;


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(v) - Counseling; and


§ 1910.1030(f)(3)(vi) - Evaluation of reported illnesses.


Purpose: This documentation allows the employer to receive feedback regarding the circumstances of worker exposures, and the information collected can then be used to focus efforts on decreasing or eliminating specific circumstances or routes of exposure. Testing for the source individual’s infectious status provides exposed workers with information that will assist them in decisions regarding testing of their own blood, complying with other elements of post-exposure management, and using precautions to prevent transmission to their sexual partners or, in the case of pregnancy, to their fetuses. Such testing also assists the healthcare professional in deciding on appropriate follow-up. Counseling of exposed employees is a vital component of post-exposure follow up procedures and that counseling concerning infection status, including results of and interpretation of all tests will assist the worker in understanding the potential risk of infection and in making decisions regarding the protection personal contacts.


Information provided to the healthcare professional (§ 1910.1030(f)(4))


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(i) - The employer shall ensure that the healthcare professional responsible for the employee's Hepatitis B vaccination is provided a copy of this regulation.


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii) - The employer shall ensure that the healthcare professional evaluating an employee after an exposure incident is provided the following information:


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(A) - A copy of this regulation;


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(B) - A description of the exposed employee's duties as they relate to the exposure incident;


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(C) - Documentation of the route(s) of exposure and circumstances under which exposure occurred;


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(D) - Results of the source individual's blood testing, if available; and


§ 1910.1030(f)(4)(ii)(E) - All medical records relevant to the appropriate treatment of the employee including vaccination status which are the employer's responsibility to maintain.


Purpose: The purpose of providing this information is to inform the Healthcare Professional of the requirements of the standard. This information, which represents the minimum necessary for proper follow-up care, enables the Healthcare Professional to understand the worker's duties, the circumstances of the exposure incident, the source individual's infectious status, the worker's Hepatitis B vaccination status and other worker medical information. This information is essential to follow-up evaluation so that a determination can be made regarding whether prophylaxis or medical treatment is indicated.


Healthcare professional’s written opinion (§ 1910.1030(f)(5)) - The employer shall obtain and provide the employee with a copy of the evaluating healthcare professional's written opinion within 15 days of the completion of the evaluation.


§ 1910.1030(f)(5)(i) - The healthcare professional's written opinion for Hepatitis B vaccination shall be limited to whether Hepatitis B vaccination is indicated for an employee, and if the employee has received such vaccination.


§ 1910.1030(f)(5)(ii) - The healthcare professional's written opinion for post-exposure evaluation and follow-up shall be limited to the following information:


§ 1910.1030(f)(5)(ii)(A) - That the employee has been informed of the results of the evaluation; and


§ 1910.1030(f)(5)(ii)(B) - That the employee has been told about any medical conditions resulting from exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials which require further evaluation or treatment.


§ 1910.1030(f)(5)(iii) - All other findings or diagnoses shall remain confidential and shall not be included in the written report.


Purpose: The written opinion is to ensure that the employer is provided with documentation that a medical assessment of the worker’s ability and indication to receive Hepatitis B vaccination was completed and to inform the employer regarding the worker’s Hepatitis B vaccination status. Additionally, the employer is provided with documentation that a post-exposure evaluation has been performed, and that the exposed worker has been informed of the results and any medical conditions from exposure that require further evaluation or treatment.


F. Communication of hazards to employees (§ 1910.1030(g))


Labels and signs (§ 1910.1030(g)(1))3


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(A) - Warning labels shall be affixed to containers of regulated waste, refrigerators and freezers containing blood or other potentially infectious material; and other containers used to store, transport or ship blood or other potentially infectious materials, except as provided in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(E), (F) and (G).


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(B) - Labels required by this section shall include the following legend:


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(C) - These labels shall be fluorescent orange or orange-red or predominantly so, with lettering and symbols in a contrasting color.


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(E) - Red bags or red containers may be substituted for labels.


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(i)(H) Labels required for contaminated equipment shall be in accordance with this paragraph and shall also state which portions of the equipment remain contaminated.


Signs (§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(ii))


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(ii)(A) - The employer shall post signs at the entrance to work areas specified in paragraph (e), HIV and HBV Research Laboratory and Production Facilities, which shall bear the following legend:



(Name of the Infectious Agent)
(Special requirements for entering the area)
(Name, telephone number of the laboratory director or other responsible person.)


§ 1910.1030(g)(1)(ii)(B) - These signs shall be fluorescent orange-red or predominantly so, with lettering and symbols in a contrasting color.


Purpose: The purpose of this requirement is to alert workers to possible exposure since the nature of the material or contents will not always be readily identified as blood or other potentially infectious materials under these circumstances. Warning labels also would inform workers that appropriate barrier precautions would need to be used if occupational exposure occurs. Posting warning signs serves as a warning to workers who may otherwise not know they are entering a restricted area. Signs would also warn workers not to enter the area unless there is a need, unless the worker has been properly trained, and unless the worker also meets all other appropriate entrance requirements listed on the sign. The signs assure that workers are aware of the specific biohazard involved and of any special measures that need to be taken before entering the restricted area.


Information and training (§ 1910.1030(g)(2))


The requirement that employers provide training to workers under paragraph (g)(2), with the exception of (g)(2)(vii)(A), is not considered to be a collection of information. OSHA is not taking burden for this activity under Item 12 of this Supporting Statement.


Under 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A), the employer must provide an accessible copy of the regulatory text of this standard and an explanation of its contents to all employees. OSHA considers this requirement to be a public disclosure of information originally supplied by the Federal government to the employer for the purpose of disclosure to the public, and therefore is not including any burden hours or costs for this provision in Item 12.


Purpose: Having a copy of the Standard readily available for workers helps to ensure that they understand all provisions of the Standard.



G. Recordkeeping (§ 1910.1030(h))


Medical records (§ 1910.1030(h)(1))


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(i) - The employer shall establish and maintain an accurate record for each employee with occupational exposure, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020.


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii) - This record shall include:


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(A) - The name of the employee;


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(B) - A copy of the employee's hepatitis B vaccination status including the dates of all the hepatitis B vaccinations and any medical records relative to the employee's ability to receive vaccination as required by paragraph (f)(2);


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(C) - A copy of all results of examinations, medical testing, and follow-up procedures as required by paragraph (f)(3);


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(D) - The employer's copy of the healthcare professional's written opinion as required by paragraph (f)(5); and


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(E) - A copy of the information provided to the healthcare professional as required by paragraphs (f)(4)(ii)(B)(C) and (D).


§ 1910.1030(h)(1)(iv) - The employer shall maintain the records required by paragraph (h) for at least the duration of employment plus 30 years in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020.


Training records (§ 1910.1030(h)(2))


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(i) - Training records shall include the following information:


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(i)(A) - The dates of the training sessions;


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(i)(B) - The contents or a summary of the training sessions;


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(i)(C) - The names and qualifications of persons conducting the training; and


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(i)(D) - The names and job titles of all persons attending the training sessions.


§ 1910.1030(h)(2)(ii) - Training records shall be maintained for 3 years from the date on which the training occurred.


Purpose: Medical and training records are necessary to assure that workers receive appropriate information on the hazards and effective prevention and treatment measures, as well as to aid in the general development of information on the causes of occupational illnesses and injuries involving bloodborne pathogens. Maintenance of medical records is essential because documentation is necessary to ensure proper evaluation of the worker’s immune status and for proper healthcare management following an exposure incident. Training records assure that training has taken place and can be used in determining the need to perform training in the future. They also enable the employer to assess the content and completeness of the training program in order to ensure that his or her workers have received the required training.


Availability (§ 1910.1030(h)(3))


§ 1910.1030(h)(3)(i) - The employer shall ensure that all records required to be maintained by this section shall be made available upon request to the Assistant Secretary and the Director for examination and copying.4


§ 1910.1030(h)(3)(ii) - Employee training records required by this paragraph shall be provided upon request for examination and copying to employees, to employee representatives, to the Director, and to the Assistant Secretary.


§ 1910.1030(h)(3)(iii) - Employee medical records required by this paragraph shall be provided upon request for examination and copying to the subject employee, to anyone having written consent of the subject employee, to the Director, and to the Assistant Secretary in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020.


Purpose: Access by employees, their representatives, and the Assistant Secretary is necessary to yield both direct and indirect improvements in the detection, treatment, and prevention of occupational disease.


§ 1910.1030(h)(4) Transfer of Records. The employer shall comply with the requirements involving transfer of records set forth in 29 CFR 1910.1020(h).


Paragraph (h) of § 1910.1020 requires employers who cease to do business to transfer medical and exposure-monitoring records to the successor employer, who then must receive and maintain the records. If no successor employer is available, the employer must, at least three months before ceasing business, notify current workers who have records of their right to access these records.


OSHA considers the employer’s transfer of records to a successor employer to be usual and customary communications during the transition from one employer to a successor employer. In this regard, the employer would communicate the location of all records, including worker exposure-monitoring and medical records, at the facility to the successor employer during the transfer of business operations, as a matter of usual and customary business practice.  


In addition, OSHA accounts for the burden hours and costs resulting from the worker notification requirements under the Information Collection Request (ICR) for its Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Standard (§ 1910.1020), OMB Control No. 1218-0065.


Sharps injury log (§ 1910.1030(h)(5))


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(i) - The employer shall establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps. The information in the sharps injury log shall be recorded and maintained in such manner as to protect the confidentiality of the injured employee. The sharps injury log shall contain, at a minimum:


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(i)(A) - The type and brand of device involved in the incident,


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(i)(B) - The department or work area where the exposure incident occurred, and


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(i)(C) - An explanation of how the incident occurred.


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(ii) - The requirement to establish and maintain a sharps injury log shall apply to any employer who is required to maintain a log of occupational injuries and illnesses under 29 CFR 1904.


§ 1910.1030(h)(5)(iii) - The sharps injury log shall be maintained for the period required by 29 CFR 1904.33.


Purpose: The sharps injury log serves as a tool for identifying tasks, areas, and devices that have a high risk for sharps injuries. The information allows the employer to focus efforts toward eliminating these high risks and in device evaluation.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


Employers may use improved information technology whenever appropriate when establishing and maintaining the required records. OSHA wrote the paperwork requirements of the Standard in performance-oriented language (i.e., in terms of what data to maintain, not how to maintain the data). The employer may also contract the services of a healthcare professional located offsite to maintain and retain medical records.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item A.2 above.


The information required to be collected and maintained is specific to each employer and employee involved and is not available or duplicated by another source. The information required by this Standard is available only from employers. At this time, there is no indication that any alternative source is available.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The information collection requirements of the Standard do not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is or is not conducted less frequently, and any technical or legal obstacles to reducing the burden.


The information collection frequencies specified by this Standard are the minimum that OSHA believes are necessary to ensure that the employer and OSHA can effectively monitor the exposure and health status of employees exposed to bloodborne pathogens.



  1. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;


requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


The Standard requires that employers must obtain and provide the worker with a copy of the evaluating healthcare professional’s written opinion within 15 days of the completion of the evaluation (§ 1910.1030(f)(5)). The 15 day provision assures that the employee is informed in a timely manner regarding information received by the employer and is consistent with other OSHA health standards.


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection before submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to those comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burdens.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, revealed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every three years -- even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that mitigate against consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), OSHA published a notice in the Federal Register on April 15, 2021 (86 FR 19904) soliciting public comments on its proposal to extend the Office of Management and Budget‘s (OMB) approval of the collection of information requirements specified in the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030). This notice was a part of a preclearance consultation program that provided the general public and government agencies with an opportunity to comment. The Agency received two comments one from Eleanor Godfrey, Director of Health and Safety for the National Nurses United (NNU), and one from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in response to this notice under Docket ID: OSHA-2010-0047.

Ms. Godfrey commented in support of the BBP standard, including the information collections. She stated in part:

“Every part of the BBP standard is important to its effectiveness, including exposure control plans, housekeeping schedules, providing workers with Hepatitis B vaccines, post- exposure medical evaluations and follow-up, maintaining medical and training records for specified periods of time, maintaining sharps injury logs, and providing employees and their representatives with access.

OSHA’s BBP Standard has had and continues to have a substantial impact on protecting nurses and health care worker safety since it was passed in 1991. For example, patient-to-health- care provider transmission of HBV in the United States declined markedly from about 10,000 in 1983 to approximately 400 in 2002 and to approximately 100 by 2009. Another study found a precipitous decline in hospital worker injury rates, of greater than one-third, and associated costs, immediately following legislation of OSHA’s Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act (114 CFR §106-430).

Moreover, the information collection requirements are necessary and appropriate to enforce the OSH Act. Information collection is fundamental to effective safety and health programs, including the BBP Standard, and it plays an important role in ensuring that employers make necessary compliance plans under the BBP Standard, that employers take the time to evaluate and improve their health and safety practices, and that OSHA can perform its enforcement duties. In addition to hurting workers, the workplace incidents that occur in the absence of safety programs can cause substantial costs to employers that outweigh any burden from information collection requirements. OSHA should maintain the information collection requirements.


Fundamental elements of the BBP Standard rely on proper employer recordkeeping and recording under the standard. An exposure control plan (ECP), for example, is the framework for compliance from which employers create and implement health and safety plans to protect workers. The “requirement to have an ECP in place is a foundation of any facility’s safety plan.” An effective safety and health management program requires that employers identify hazards and assess exposures, create an exposure control plan, and then maintain recordkeeping and recording to be able to review effectiveness and identify problems and update the exposure control plan. Without a plan that employees can review, like the ECP plan under the BBP standard, safety measures to protect workers against occupational hazards will not be implemented consistently.


For instance, housekeeping is an essential part of exposure control plans under the BBP standard to prevent worker exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials in health care settings. Housekeeping schedules are required to ensure that patient care and other work areas are clean and sanitary, and to ensure that contaminated sharps and other regulated waste are discarded immediately to prevent exposure. For the housekeeping requirements to be effective, staff need to have access to the schedule. Thus, including a requirement for information collection on housekeeping schedules is necessary for the effective implementation of an employer’s ECP under the BBP Standard.


Information collection on Hepatitis B vaccinations as specified in the BBP Standard have also been impactful, in combination with engineering and work practice controls in the context of an exposure control plan, on the effective enforcement of the BBP Standard. For examples, a study of nearly 100 hospitals conducted between June and August 1992 found that issuance of the BBP standard resulted in increased vaccination rates and awareness of risk for HBV infections. As noted above, rates of transmission from patients to health care providers fell off precipitously as the standard was implemented.


Finally, the need to protect health care workers from bloodborne exposures requires comprehensive tracking of occupational injuries and illnesses “to determine the underlying hazards, their causes, and safety and health program shortcomings.” For example, the sharps injury logs required under OSHA’s BBP Standard ensure that needlestick injuries and cuts from contaminated sharp objects are recorded in order to identify any high-risk areas and improve current health and safety programs. Providing and tracking confidential medical evaluations and immediate follow-up after an exposure incident occurs are also required under the BBP’s information collection provisions. These requirements allow identification and documentation of the source individual, route(s) of exposure and helps determine if post-exposure prophylaxis treatment is needed. As such, maintaining employee medical and training records for specified periods is important in identifying occupational exposures.


All the requirements described above as well as all the other information collection requirements under the BBP Standard are necessary to the protection offered by the BBP Standard and to OSHA’s enforcement of the BBP Standard and should be maintained by OSHA.”


OSHA agrees with and appreciates Ms. Godfrey’s comments regarding the importance of the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) and the necessity of the information collections it contains. The information collections are important and necessary for the enforcement of standards. OSHA implementing standards, compliance programs and measuring the burden the standards pose on employers are ways in which OSHA measure the effectiveness of the standard and keep the workplace free from hazards.


The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) submitted a comment recommending that OSHA revise paragraph (f)(2)(i) of the standard—requiring employers to make the Hepatitis B vaccine available to employees—“to add an exception . . . for employees who have received a disability or religious accommodation allowing them to refrain from participating in covered entities’ Hepatitis B vaccination programs.” They stated that including such an exemption “may enhance applicants’ and employees’ awareness of their right to request such accommodations [under federal anti-discrimination laws], and regulated entities’ awareness of their responsibility to provide such accommodations, absent undue hardship.”

OSHA first notes that the BBP standard does not require any employee to receive the Hepatitis B vaccine. Rather, it requires that the vaccine “be made available” to employees under certain circumstances and explicitly contemplates employees declining to receive it. See 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1030(f)(2)(i), (iii), (iv). The existing exceptions in paragraph (f)(2)(i)—where “the employee has previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, antibody testing has revealed that the employee is immune, or the vaccine is contraindicated for medical reasons”—merely relieve the employer of the duty to provide the vaccine and do not limit the circumstances under which employees may decline it.


Regardless, whether an employee is entitled to an accommodation under the various federal anti-discrimination laws—or whether OSHA should make such accommodation requirements explicit in the standard—is not a paperwork issue within the scope of this ICR. Moreover, this ICR is not related to any change in the existing requirements of the standard. To the extent the EEOC requests changes to the regulatory requirements that is a matter that would have to be addressed through rulemaking.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No payments or gifts will be provided to the respondents.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


To ensure that the personal information contained in medical records remains confidential, OSHA developed 29 CFR 1913.10 to regulate access to these records.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


None of the provisions in the Standard require the collection of sensitive information.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.


Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.


Industry Profile


The agency estimates there are 701,563 establishments affected by the standard. The establishments are likely to be health care establishments. For this ICR, the industry profile from the regulatory impact analysis (RIA) was updated using 2018 County Business Patterns where OSHA’s sectors, originally based on the 1997 County Business Patterns and 1987 SIC, could be reasonably represented by a selection of NAICS industries. Additional details about the industry profile estimate can be found in Attachment A.


Classification of Employees


The RIA groups employees into four groups depending upon their duties. Group A employees are those who have direct patient health care responsibilities, such as physicians and nurses. Group B employees are those employed in laboratories or who have emergency response duties, such as emergency medical technicians, fire fighters, and law enforcement officers. Group C employees are housekeepers and janitors. Group D employees are other workers, such as drivers, service workers, and social workers.


To update the number of affected employees, the Agency, using the original RIA estimates, determined the number of employees per category, per establishment. The number of employees per category, per establishment, was multiplied by the number of establishments as listed in Attachment A to determine the total number of affected employees in the various job categories. The number of affected employees, job turnover rates and occupational turnover rates by industry and job classification are provided in Appendix B.


Respondent Burden-Hour and Cost burden Determinations


The burden hour and cost analysis below includes references to tables containing detailed supporting spreadsheet calculations. To view these spreadsheet tables, see the document titled “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)” which is uploaded as a separate pdf document in the docket for the preclearance ICR, and also uploaded with the finalized ICR when it is submitted to OMB.


The Agency determined the wage rates from mean hourly wage earnings to represent the cost of employee time.  For the relevant standard occupational classification category, OSHA used the wage rates reported in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), U.S. Department of Labor.  Occupational Employment Statistics (OES), May 2019 [date accessed: October 27, 2020].  (OES data is available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/may/oessrci.htmhttps://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm.  To access a wage rate, select the year, “Occupation Profiles,” and the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code.)


To account for fringe benefits, the Agency used the BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, December 17, 2020; accessed February 16, 20215. BLS reported that for civilian workers, fringe benefits accounted for 31.4 percent of total compensation and wages accounted for the remaining 68.6 percent.  To calculate the loaded hourly wage for each occupation, the Agency divided the mean hourly wage rate by 1 minus the fringe benefits.



TABLE A - WAGE HOUR ESTIMATES

Occupational Title

Standard Occupation Code

Mean Hour Wage Rate

(A)

Fringe Benefits (B)

Loaded Hourly Wage Rate

(C) = (A)/((1-(B))

Manager/Supervisor

11-0000 (NAICS 62) [a]

$49.47

0.3139

$72.10

Employee

00-0000 (NAICS 62)

$26.58

0.3139

$38.74

Clerical Employee

43-0000 (NAICS 62)

$18.75

0.3139

$27.33

Personnel Training and Labor Relations Specialist and Counselor

13-1075 (NAICS 62)

$35.82

0.3139

$52.21

Infection Control Practitioner and Healthcare Provider

29-9011 [b]

$36.82

0.3139

$53.66

Medical Personnel (Category A)

29-0000

$40.21

0.3139

$58.61

Laboratory Technician and Emergency Response Personnel (Category B)

29-2012 [b]

$21.18

0.3139

$30.87

Service Workers (Category D)

53-0000

$18.23

0.3139

$26.57

[a] NAICS 62 refers to the Health Care and Social Assistance Sector.


[b] Code no longer exists. Previous estimates based on 2016 wage rates were inflated using the same rate of growth as for the average wage rate for medical occupations overall (29-0000).

Note: Sector and occupational delineations based on those specified in earlier ICRs for this standard.


A. Exposure control plan


(1) Exposure control plan (§ 1910.1030(c)(1)-(2))


There are four key elements that constitute the exposure control plan: the exposure determination, the schedule and method of implementation of the provisions of the Standard, employee solicitation and the procedure for evaluating exposure incidents.


The exposure determination is the identification and documentation of those tasks and procedures where occupational exposures may take place and the employees who perform those tasks and procedures. This includes a list of all job classifications where all employees have occupational exposure and a list of job classifications in which some but not all employees have occupational exposure and the tasks and procedures that they perform that place them at risk for occupational exposure. The employer must provide a schedule and method of implementation of the provisions of the Standard.


Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) requires the employer to annually review and update their exposure control plan. When employers review and update their exposure control plans, employers must ensure that the plan: (A) reflects changes in technology that eliminate or reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens; and (B) includes documentation of consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure.


The burden hours associated with the development of the exposure control plan are for new employers to develop their exposure control plan and existing employers to update their exposure control plan. To develop plans, hospitals take 16 hours; medical and dental labs take 8 hours; and, physicians, dentists and residential care 4 hours. OSHA estimates that hospitals will require 8 hours annually to review and update their plans. All other sectors take 2 hours to review and update their exposure control plans. The total burden hours for the written exposure control plan are 1,444,562.00. The assumptions made and the breakdown by type of facility are found in Table 1 in the supporting tables6 for this document.


Burden hours: 701,563 healthcare establishments x 123.54/60 hours = 1,444,562.00 hours

Cost: 1,444,562.00 hours x $53.66 = $77,515,196.92




(2) Exposure co ntrol plan – Documentation required by the Needlestick Prevention Act

Employers must document consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designated to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure and employee solicitation in the exposure plan. These employers are likely to be in health care industry establishments, as noted in Table A. The effort for this documentation is 15 minutes (15/60 hour) of managerial time earning $72.10 an hour.


Burden hours: 448,515 health care establishments, x 15/60 hour = 112,128.75 hours

Cost: 112,128.75 hours x $72.10 = $8,084,482.87


(3) Employee Solicitation § 1910.1030(c)(1)(v)


Employers who are required to establish an exposure control plan must solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and shall document the solicitation in the “Exposure control plan.”


The overwhelming majority of establishments that have employees who are responsible for direct patient care and who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps are likely to be in health care industry establishments. The Agency estimates there are 448,515 establishments that must solicit input from non-managerial employees.


OSHA estimates that the initial solicitation requires 15 minutes (15/60 hour) of managerial time.


Burden hours: 448,515 health care establishments x 15/60 hour = 112,128.75 hours

Costs: 112,128.75 hours x $72.10 = $8,084,482.87



(4) Employee Response § 1910.1030(c)(1)(v)


The burden hours and costs associated with the employee response will vary with the number of employees and the response rate to the initial solicitation. The Agency estimates that there are 14,280,388 individuals employed in the relevant NAICS industries. OSHA estimates that it takes 15 minutes (15/60 hour) of employee time to respond to the solicitation and that approximately 33% or 4,712,528 individuals will respond. OSHA uses a wage rate of $38.74.


Burden hours: 4,712,528 individuals x 15/60 hour = 1,178,132.01 hours

Costs: 1,178,132.01 hours x $38.74 = $45,640,834.06


B. Housekeeping (§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(i)) Burden hours: 0


The employer must determine and implement an appropriate written schedule for cleaning and method of disinfection based on the location within the facility, type of surface to be cleaned, type of soil present, and tasks or procedures being performed. Since it is customary for facilities to have a written housekeeping plan, the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard would not impose a significant paperwork burden.


C. Laundry (§ 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(A)(2)) Burden hours: 0


Labeling requirements required by this paragraph are currently in place and are being followed by the facilities covered by Bloodborne Pathogens Standard; therefore, there is no additional burden from the labeling procedures.


D. HIV/HBV research laboratories and production facilities (§ 1910.1030(e)(2)(ii)(M))


Burden hours: 0


The employer must adopt or prepare a biosafety manual. The biosafety manual is a usual and customary part of any viral research program where harmful microorganisms are used on a routine basis or in any production facility where large quantities of these microorganisms are being cultured (grown), for example, in the production of viral vaccines. Therefore, there are no additional burden hours.


E. Hepatitis B Vaccine; Post exposure follow-up (§ 1910.1030(f))


(1) Hepatitis B Vaccination Burden hours: 396,122.77


The Standard requires employers to make available the hepatitis B vaccine to all employees who have occupational exposure unless: the employee has previously received the complete hepatitis B vaccination series, antibody testing reveals that the employee is immune, or the vaccine is contraindicated for medical reasons. Since the Standard has been in effect since December, 1991, most employees with occupational exposure have already been offered the vaccine. The Agency expects that most vaccinations would be offered to employees who are newly entering the field. All newly hired employees who have contact with patients or blood and are at an ongoing risk for injuries with sharp instruments or needle sticks must be tested for the antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, one to two months after completion of the 2-dose or 3-dose vaccination series.7 Since this procedure would require employee time to be vaccinated and healthcare professional time to administer the vaccine, we have prepared two tables. The assumptions made and the breakdowns by type of facility are found in Table 2 for employee’s time and Table 3 for the healthcare professional time. Table 2 estimates the total burden for all employees to receive HBV vaccinations and to be tested for hepatitis B surface antigen is 271,850.81. The total burden hours for healthcare professionals in Table 3 are 124,271.96.8


(2) Antibody testing of source individuals Burden hours: 45,135.02


The Standard requires that if an exposure incident occurs then the employer is to contact the individual whose blood is the source of the exposure (source individual) and, after legal consent is obtained, test the source individual to determine HIV and HBV infectivity. The assumptions for determining the burden hours for the healthcare professional to provide source testing for both HIV and HBV are in Table 4. Burden hours for the healthcare professional to provide HIV source testing are estimated to be 39,803.32 hours (Table 4-1), while source testing for HBV is estimated to be 5,331.70 hours (Table 4-2).9


(3) HBV antibody testing for workers Burden hours: 17,118.90


The Standard requires that the employer provide post exposure evaluation and follow up according to the recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service current at the time the evaluation and follow up takes place. The employer must obtain consent of the exposed employee to collect and test the exposed employee's blood to establish a baseline sample (HBV). The current CDC guideline states that within 24 hours, post exposure prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and/or vaccine should be administered when indicated (e.g., after percutaneous or mucous membrane exposure to blood known or suspected to be HbsAg (hepatitis B surface antigen) positive). The assumptions made and the breakdown by type of facility is found in Tables 5 through 12 in the supporting tables to this document.10


Tables 5 and 7 estimate that it will take 11,401.64 hours for vaccinated workers, and 1,616.98 hours for non-vaccinated workers, respectively, to receive HBV post exposure blood tests. Table 6 estimates that it takes healthcare professionals 3,397.87 hours to administer the HBV post exposure blood tests to vaccinated workers and Table 8 estimates that healthcare professionals will take 285.09 hours to administer the HBV post exposure blood tests to non-vaccinated workers.


Tables 9 through 12 determine burden hours and costs for administering the Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG).11 Table 9 estimates a total of 11.60 hours for vaccinated workers to receive HBIG and Table 10 estimates it takes healthcare professionals a total of 4.03 hours to administer HBIG to vaccinated workers. Table 11 estimates a total of 335.82 hours for non-vaccinated workers to receive HBIG and Table 12 estimates it takes healthcare professionals a total of 65.87 hours to administer HBIG to non-vaccinated workers.


(4) HIV serologic testing and post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for exposed workers

Burden hours: 362,141.12


The Standard requires that the employer provide post exposure evaluation and follow up according the current recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service at the time the evaluation and follow up takes place. The employer must obtain the exposed employee’s consent to collect and test the exposed employee's blood to establish a baseline sample. The current Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendation for healthcare professionals12 who have occupational exposure to blood or other body fluids that may contain HIV virus includes post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) that includes a basic regimen of two drugs for four weeks and in most cases an “expanded” regimen that includes a third drug.


Tables 13 and 14 calculate the burden hours for workers and healthcare professionals respectively.13 The hours for administration of HIV antibody testing for workers are 280,022.66 hours and for the healthcare professionals are 82,118.46 hours.




To estimate the burden hours and costs for PEP, OSHA estimated 8,923 healthcare professionals14 (HCP) would be eligible for the PEP, and it will take one hour initially and at least one hour for follow-up visits. This includes travel time. The total burden hours for HCPs’ PEP are 17,846.00 hours. OSHA estimates that an HCP earns $53.66 an hour, resulting in a wage hour cost of $957,616.36.


(5) Counseling for exposed workers Burden hours: 619,986.72


The Standard requires that post exposure counseling be provided to employees who have had an exposure incident. This information is presented in a single table that accounts for both employee and counselor time. The assumptions made, and the breakdown by type of facility are found in Table 15 in the supporting tables of this document.15


  1. Information provided to healthcare professionals Burden hours: 118,968.30


Information concerning the nature of the exposure incident must be provided to the physician so that the healthcare professional will know what actions to take in the follow up care. The Agency has determined the hours by multiplying the number of exposure incidents (1,189,683)16 by 6 minutes (6/60 hours).

OSHA assumes a clerk earning $27.33 will provide the information to the physician; therefore, the total cost is $3,251,403.63.


(7) Healthcare professionals written opinion Burden hours: 118,968.30


The standard requires the employer to obtain and provide the employee with a copy of the evaluating healthcare professional’s written opinion within 15 days of the completion of the evaluation. We have determined the hours by multiplying the number of exposure incidents (1,189,683) by 6 minutes. OSHA assumes a clerk earning $27.33 will provide the information to the physician; therefore, the total cost is $3,251,403.63.


F. Communication of hazards to employees


(1) Labels and signs (§ 1910.1030(e)(2)(ii) and (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii)) Burden hours: 0


Paragraph (e)(2)(ii) requires that HIV and HBV research laboratories and production facilities that send contaminated materials to a site away from the work area, place the materials in a durable, leak proof container that is labeled or color coded. When infectious materials or infected animals are in the work area, a hazard warning sign, with the universal biohazard symbol, must be posted on all access doors. Paragraph (g)(1)(ii) requires the sign contain the biohazard symbol, the word "biohazard", the name of the infectious agent, special requirements for entering the area, and the name and telephone number of the laboratory director or other responsible person. They must be fluorescent orange-red or predominantly so, with lettering and symbol in a contrasting color. Since these signs have been permanently mounted there is no additional burden.


Paragraph (g)(1)(i) requires that employers place warning labels on containers of regulated waste, refrigerators and freezers containing blood or other potentially infectious material; and other containers used to store, transport or ship blood or other potentially infectious materials, except as provided in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(E), (F) and (G). The requirements for the color of the labels are identical for those for the signs except that red bags or red containers may be substituted for labeled containers for regulated wastes. There are no burden hours unique for labeling since containers used to transport or store blood or regulated wastes are now manufactured and widely available with labels and symbols already affixed to them.


G. Recordkeeping (§ 1910.1030(h)(1)-(4)) Total hours: 1,177,260.04



(1) Medical Records Burden hours: 965,943.17


The Standard requires the employer to maintain medical surveillance records for each employee in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1020. These confidential records must contain the employee's name, a copy of each employee's hepatitis B vaccination record, the circumstances of any occupational exposure incident, results of medical testing as they relate to the employee's ability to receive vaccination or post exposure evaluation following an exposure incident; a copy of the physician's written opinion; and a copy of the information provided to the physician. The records must be maintained for at least the duration of each employee's period of employment plus 30 years. The time required for medical recordkeeping is based on the need to establish medical records for new hires and to update existing medical records for current employees. The assumptions and breakdown by facility type are found in Table 18 in the supporting tables to this document.17


(2) Training Records Burden hours: 160,153.70


The Standard requires the employer to maintain training records. These records must contain the following information: the dates of the training sessions; the contents or a summary of the contents of the training sessions; the names and qualifications of persons conducting the training; and the names and job titles of all persons attending the training. These records do not have to be individual records kept in each employee's personnel folder but can be created and maintained for each training session that may provide training for many employees. These records must be maintained for 3 years. The assumptions and breakdown by facility type are found in Table 19 in the supporting tables to this document.18


(3) Employee Access Burden hours: 1,982.83


The Standard requires that employee medical records also be made available to anyone having the written consent of the employee. OSHA assumes that the records that will be requested by 2% of employees who have had an exposure incident, and that it would take a clerical, earning $27.33 per hour 5 minutes (5/60 hour) to provide access. The calculation of burden hours is based on number of exposures per year (1,189,683) x 2% x 5/60 hours.


Costs then equals 1,982.83 hours x $27.33 = $54,190.84.


(4) Sharps Injury Log Burden hours: 49,180.33


Employers who are required to maintain an occupational injuries and illness log under 29 CFR 1904 must establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps. The information in the sharps injury log must be recorded and maintained in a manner as to protect the confidentiality of the injured employee. The sharps injury log must contain the following: (A) the type and brand of device involved in the incident, (B) the department or work area where the exposure incident occurred, and (C) an explanation of how the incident occurred.


The burden hours and costs attributable to the log are based on the number of needlestick and sharp injuries and the time to record the required information. OSHA estimates there are 590,164 needlestick and sharps injuries annually19, and it takes a staff member with a skill level of a Personnel Training and Labor Relations Specialist, with an hourly wage rate of $52.21, five minutes (5/60 hour) to collect the data and enter it onto a separate log.


The format of the sharps injury log is not specified. The employer is permitted to determine the format in which the log is maintained (e.g. paper or electronic), and may include information in addition to that required by the standard, so long as the privacy of the injured workers is protected. Many employers already compile reports of percutaneous exposure incidents in a variety of ways. Existing mechanisms for collecting this information will be considered sufficient to meet the requirements of the standard for maintaining a sharps injury log, provided that the information gathered meets the minimum requirements specified in the standard, and the confidentiality of the injured employee is protected.


Burden hours: 590,164 cases x 5/60 hour = 49,180.33 hours

Cost: 49,180.33 hours x $52.21 = $2,567,705.20
















Table B

Estimated Annualized Respondent Hour and Cost Burden 20

Information Collection Requirement

Type of Respondent

No. of Respondents

No. of Responses

Total Responses

Average Burden

(In hours)

Total Burden Hours

Hourly Wage Rate

Total Burden Cost

A. Exposure Control Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Exposure control plan (§ 1910.1030(c)(1)-(2)) (Table 1)

Employer

701,563.00

1.00

701,563.00

123.54/60

1,444,562.00

$53.66

$77,515,196.92

(2) Documentation required by the Needlestick Prevention Act

Employer

448,515.00

1.00

448,515.00

15.00/60

112,128.75

$72.10

$8,084,482.87

(3) Employee Solicitation (c)(1)(v)

Employer

448,515.00

1.00

448,515.00

15.00/60

112,128.75

$72.10

$8,084,482.87

(4) Employee Response (c)(1)(v)

Employee

14,280,388.00

0.33

4,712,528.04

15.00/60

1,178,132.01

$38.74

$45,640,834.06

Subtotal (A.)

 

 

 

6,311,121.04

 

2,846,951.51

 

$139,324,996.73

E. Hepatitis B Vaccine; Post exposure follow-up (1910.1030(f))

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Hepatitis B Vaccination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2

Employee

8,425,606.58

0.03

325,881.00

50.05/60

271,850.81

$38.74

$10,531,500.4

Table 3

Healthcare Professional (HCP)

8,425,606.58

0.03

268,269.00

27.79/60

124,271.96

$53.66

$6,668,433.42

(2) Antibody testing of source individuals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4-1

HCP

594,841.50

0.80

477,718.00

4.99/60

39,803.32

$53.66

$2,135,846.11

Table 4-2

Employee

594,841.50

0.10

63,986.00

4.99/60

5,331.70

$38.74

$206,550.06

(3) HBV antibody testing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 5

Employee

1,189,683.00

0.04

53,116.00

12.87/60

11,401.64

$38.74

$441,699.53

Table 6

HCP

1,189,683.00

0.03

40,772.00

5.00/60

3,397.87

$53.66

$182,329.96

Table 7

Employee

1,189,683.00

0.005

5,769.00

16.81/60

1,616.98

$38.74

$62,641.81

Table 8

HCP

1,189,683.00

0.003

3,422.00

4.99/60

285.09

$53.66

$15,297.76

Table 9

Employee

1,189,683.00

0.00005

56.00

12.42/60

11.60

$38.74

$449.24

Table 10

HCP

1,189,683.00

0.00004

48.00

5.03/60

4.03

$53.66

$214.64

Table 11

Employee

1,189,683.00

0.001

1,258.00

16.01/60

335.82

$38.74

$13,009.67

Table 12

HCP

1,189,683.00

0.001

792.00

4.99/60

65.87

$53.66

$3,534.56

(4) HIV serologic testing and post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for exposed workers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 13

Employee

1,189,683.00

1.08

1,293,200.00

12.99/60

280,022.66

$38.74

$10,848,077.71

Table 14

HCP

1,189,683.00

0.13

164,236.00

30.00/60

82,118.46

$53.66

$4,406,476.39

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)

HCP

8,923.00

1.00

8,923.00

120.00/60

17,846.00

$53.66

$957,616.36

(5) Counseling for exposed workers (Table 15)

Employee and HCP

1,189,683.00

0.81

964,062.00

38.58/60

619,986.72

$45.48

$28,193,896.03

(6) Information provided to healthcare professionals

Clerical

1,189,683.00

1.00

1,189,683.00

6.00.00/60

118,968.30

$27.33

$3,251,403.63

(7) HCP written opinion

Clerical

1,189,683.00

1.00

1,189,683.00

6/60

118,968.30

$27.33

$3,251,403.63

Subtotal (E.)

 

 

 

6,050,874.00

 

1,696,287.13

 

$71,170,380.91

G. Recordkeeping (1910.1030 (h)(1)-(h)(4))

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Medical Records (Table 18)

HCP

8,425,606.96

0.50

4,256,292.00

13.61/60

965,943.17

$53.66

$51,832,510.50

(2) Training Records (Table 19)

HCP

8,425,606.96

1.14

9,609,226.00

0.99/60

160,153.70

$53.66

$8,593,847.54

(3) Employee Access

Employee

1,189,683.00

0.02

23,794.00

5.00/60

1,982.83

$27.33

$54,190.84

(4) Sharps Injury Log

Employer

590,164.00

1.00

590,164.00

5.00/60

49,180.33

$52.21

$2,567,705.20

Subtotal (G.)

 

 

 

14,479,476.00

 

1,177,260.03

 

$63,048,254.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Total

 

 

 

26,841,471.04

 

5,720,498.67

 

$273,543,631.72

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).


• The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start‑up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start‑up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.


• If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60‑day pre‑OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.


Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


Certain employers will incur costs for the various medical requirements contained in the Standard. The costs to respondents are reflected in Tables 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. The table below summarizes the costs.


In addition, employers will incur the cost of providing post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to employees who have had occupational exposure to blood, and other body fluids, that may contain HIV.


There are a host of drugs that can be prescribed by the doctors depending on the employee's personal health and drug tolerance. Since the costs of these drugs can vary significantly, the Agency based the cost estimate on the most frequently used drugs.21


OSHA estimates it costs $3,403.40 per employee to provide the 4-week PEP. For purposes of estimating costs, OSHA assumes each employee will receive an expanded regiment which consists of Combivir and a protease inhibitor. OSHA estimates one tablet of Combivir costs $11.05 which must be taken twice a day for 28 days resulting in a cost of $618.80. One tablet of a protease inhibitor costs $11.05. Three tablets must be taken three times a day for 28 days, costing $2,784.60. OSHA estimated that 8,923 employees may be provided PEP at a cost of $3,403.40 per employee, totaling $30,368,538.20.



TABLE C

CHANGES IN COSTS


 

Medical Provision

 

Existing Costs

 

Estimated Costs

Hepatitis B Vaccination (Table 3)22

$11,382,628.00

$11,537,089.52

 

HIV Testing - (Table 4)

$2,623,678.00

$2,623,909.48

 

HBV Source Testing - (Table 4 (Cont’d))

$1,201,382.00

$1,201,381.74

 

HBV Antibody Testing for Vaccinated Workers (Table 6)

$371,183.00

$374,580.94

 

HBV Antibody Testing for Non Vaccinated Workers (Table 8)

$70,858.00

$71,143.17

 

Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Vaccinated Workers (Table 10)

$2,782.00

$2,784.17

 

Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Non Vaccinated Workers (Table 12)

$99,018.00

$99,018.58

 

HIV Antibody Tests (Table 14)

$6,155,548.00

$6,237,666.73

 

PEP to Employees

$29,910,908.00

$30,368,538.2030

Total Costs

$51,817,985.00

$52,516,112.50



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


The Agency has no annualized cost associated with enforcing the Standard. OSHA would only review records in the context of an investigation of a particular employer to determine compliance with the Standard. These activities are outside the scope of the PRA. See 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(2).

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.


The Agency is requesting an adjustment increase of 32,816.66 burden hours (from 5,687,682.00 hours to 5,720,498.67 hours). This increase is a result of updated data showing an increase in the number of facilities (from 700,724 to 701,563) and employees (from 8,399,358 to 8,425,607) affected by the Standard.


The operation and maintenance cost increased $698,127.51, from $51,817,985.00 to $52,516,112.50, due to the increase in medical costs (administration of the Hepatitis B Vaccine and the PEP treatment). This increase is also a result of updated data showing an increase in the number of facilities and employees affected by the Standard.



16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


OSHA will not publish the information collected under the Standard.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


OSHA lists current valid control numbers in §§ 1910.8, 1915.8, 1917.4, 1918.4, and 1926.5 and publishes the expiration date in the Federal Register notice announcing OMB approval of the information-collection requirement. (See 5 CFR 1320.3(f)(3).) OSHA believes that this is the most appropriate and accurate mechanism to inform interested parties of these expiration dates.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement.


OSHA is not seeking an exception to the certification statement.


B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS.


This Supporting Statement does not contain any information collection requirements that employ statistical methods.


Attachment: Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)

Table D



Collection of Information

Existing Burden Hours

Requested Burden Hours

Change

Reasons for Burden Hour Change

(A) Exposure control plan

 

 

 

 

(1) Written Plan (Table 1)

1,443,520.00

1,444,562.00

1,042.00

Change in affected employers

(2) Documentation required by the Needlestick Prevention Act

112,042.00

112,128.75

86.75

Change in affected employers

(3) Employee Solicitation

112,042.00

112,128.75

86.75

Change in affected employers

(4) Employee Response

1,146,810.00

1,178,132.01

31,322.01

Change in affected employees

(E) Hepatitis B Vaccination and post-exposure evaluation and follow-up

 

 

 

 

(1) Hepatitis B Vaccination

269,012.00

271,850.81

2,838.81

Change in affected employees

Table 2 (Employee time)

Table 3 (Healthcare Professional Time)

123,832.00

124,271.96

439.96

Change in affected employees

(2) Antibody Testing Source Individuals Table 4 HIV Source Testing (Healthcare Professional Time

39,651.00

39,803.32

152.32

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 4 Cont’d HBV Source Testing

5,310.00

5,331.70

21.70

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(3) HBV Antibody Testing for workers Table 5 HBV Antibody Testing for Vaccinated Worker (Employee Time)

11,402.00

11,401.64

-0.36

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 6 HBV Testing for Vaccinated Workers (Healthcare Professional Time)

3,387.00

3,397.87

10.87

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 7 HBV Antibody Testing for Non-Vaccinated Workers (Employee Time)

1,617.00

1,616.98

-0.02

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 8 HBV Antibody Testing for Non-vaccinated Workers (Healthcare Professional Time)

281.00

285.09

4.09

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 9 Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIG) Vaccinated Workers (Employee Time)

12.00

11.60

-0.40

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 10 HBIG: Vaccinated Workers (Healthcare Professional Time)

4.00

4.03

0.03

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 11 HBIG Non Vaccinated Workers (Employee Time)

335.00

335.82

0.82

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 12: HBIG Non-vaccinated Workers (Healthcare Professional Time)

65.00

65.87

0.87

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(4) HIV serologic testing and Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) exposed workers

17,704.00

17,846.00

142.00

Change in affected employees

Table 13 HIV Antibody Tests (Employee Time)

280,022.00

280,022.66

0.66

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

Table 14 HIV Antibody Tests (Healthcare Professional Time)

81,789.00

82,118.46

329.46

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(5) Counseling for exposed Workers (Table 15)

619,983.00

619,986.72

3.72

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(6) Information provided to the healthcare professional

118,968.00

118,968.30

0.30

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(7) Healthcare professional’s written opinion

118,968.00

118,968.30

0.30

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(G) Recordkeeping

 

 

 

 

(1) Medical records (Table 18: Medical records)

969,006.00

965,943.17

-3,062.83

Change in affected employers

(2) Training Records (Table 19: Updating or creating training records)

162,803.00

160,153.70

-2,649.30

Change in affected employers

(3) Employee access

1,904.00

1,982.83

78.83

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

(4) Sharps injury log

47,213.00

49,180.33

1,967.33

Difference due to revision in rounding methodology.

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

5,687,682.00

5,720,498.67

32,816.66

-


Attachment A

Number of Establishments


Establishment Type

Total Affected

*Office of Physicians

221,580

*Office of Dentists

136,550

*Nursing Homes

20,792

*Hospitals

6,906

*Medical and Dental Labs

23,958

*Home Health

11,237

*Hospices

651

*Hemodialysis

391

*Drug Rehabilitation

744

*Blood/Plasma/Tissue Centers

1,573

*Residential Care

13,240

Sub-Total 1

448,515

Personnel Services

1,348

Funeral Services

20,739

Health Units in Industry

202,540

Research Labs

1,453

Linen Services

1,533

Medical Equipment Repair

1,076

Law Enforcement

7,780

Fire and Rescue

5,452

Correctional Facilities

4,656

Lifesaving

100

Schools

6,321

Waste Removal

50

Sub-Total 2

253,048

Total

701,563


Table A Source: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Office of Regulatory Analysis. This industry profile was updated using 2018 County Business Patterns where OSHA’s sectors, originally based on the 1997 County Business Patterns and 1987 SIC, could be reasonably represented by a selection of NAICS industries.

Data from the 2018 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Survey of Employment and Wages was used for profile estimates of public sector establishments and employees For this ICR, establishment estimates were updated using U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns, 2018 (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/data.html) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages 2018, Annual Averages (https://www.bls.gov/cew/datatoc.htm), both accessed 10/21/2020. *Establishments that are likely to be health care industry establishments (included in SIC 80 or NAICS 62).




Attachment B


Number of Affected Employees, Job Turnover Rates, and

Occupational Turnover Rates by Industry and Job Classification


 

Number of Affected

Employees

Job Turnover

Rate

Occupational

Turnover Rate

Offices of Physicians

 

 

 

Category A

1,264,025

22.80%

6.90%

C

9,104

31.60%

9.80%

D

91,031

21.80%

12.90%

Offices of Dentists

 

 

 

Category A

490,298

26.80%

1.60%

Nursing Homes

 

 

 

Category A

665,043

49.90%

24.80%

C

42,906

31.60%

9.80%

D

7,151

31.60%

9.80%

Hospitals

 

 

 

Category A

2,363,094

27.20%

14.70%

B

201,910

21.80%

12.90%

C

314,082

31.60%

9.80%

Medical and Dental Labs

 

 

 

Category A

282,394

21.70%

12.90%

C

2,175

31.60%

9.80%

D

245,191

31.60%

9.80%

Home Health Care

 

 

 

Category A

336,402

36.30%

22.30%

C

4,973

31.60%

9.80%

D

10,442

36.30%

22.50%

Hospices

 

 

 

Category A

10,565

36.30%

22.50%

C

154

31.60%

9.80%

D

27

36.30%

22.50%

Hemodialysis

 

 

 

Category A

4,964

25.50%

15.40%

C

87

31.60%

22.50%

D

230

21.80%

12.90%

Drug Rehabilitation

 

 

 

Category A

6,067

25.50%

15.40%

C

149

31.60%

22.50%

D

506

21.80%

12.90%

Government Clinics

 

 

 

Category A

52,156

22.80%

13.50%

C

381

31.60%

9.80%

D

3,808

21.80%

12.90%

Blood/Plasma/Tissue Centers

 

 

 

Category A

39,213

21.80%

12.90%

C

431

31.60%

9.80%

D

840

36.30%

22.50%

Residential Care

 

 

 

Category A

73,485

49.60%

24.30%

C

2,029

31.60%

9.80%

D

12,042

36.30%

9.80%

Personnel Services

 

 

 

Category A

61,387

100.00%

8.70%

D

102,090

31.60%

9.80%

Funeral Services

 

 

 

Category A

53,233

21.80%

12.90%

C

2,837

31.60%

9.80%

D

3,376

31.60%

9.80%

Health Units in Industry

 

 

 

Category A

34,184

31.70%

19.50%

B

141,051

21.80%

9.80%

D

3,497

31.60%

12.90%

Research Labs

 

 

 

Category A

87,484

21.80%

12.90%

C

1,315

31.60%

9.80%

D

352

21.80%

12.90%

Linen Services

 

 

 

Category D

61,320

54.00%

9.80%

Medical Equipment Repair

 

 

 

Category A

473

38.30%

22.50%

B

200

38.30%

12.90%

C

5,152

21.80%

12.90%

D

360

21.80%

22.50%

Law Enforcement

 

 

 

Category A

482,544

10.10%

7.80%

B

1,788

21.80%

9.80%

C

4,117

31.60%

7.80%

D

48,797

10.10%

12.90%

Fire and Rescue

 

 

 

Category A

195,588

21.80%

12.90%

B

234,316

8.50%

22.50%

D

3,040

38.30%

7.80%

Correctional Facilities

 

 

 

Category A

20,592

31.70%

19.50%

B

203,643

41.00%

12.90%

C

17,870

31.60%

17.70%

D

53,285

29.10%

7.80%

Lifesaving

 

 

 

Category A

5,000

21.80%

12.90%

Schools

 

 

 

Category A

23,514

25.00%

15.00%

D

17,848

36.30%

22.50%

Waste Removal

 

 

 

Category A

13,300

36.30%

22.50%

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

8,425,607

 

 





Note: Estimated based on unpublished data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, January 1987, as shown in OSHA-H370-0950-1162, BBP RIA, Technical Appendices.




1 The purpose of this supporting statement is to analyze and describe the burden hours and costs associated with provisions of the Standard that contain paperwork requirements; this supporting statement does not provide information or guidance on how to comply with, or how to enforce the Standard.

2 “Occupational exposure” means reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials that may result from the performance of an employee’s duties.


3Paragraphs (d)(2)(xiii)(A), Containers for storage, transportation or shipping; and (d)(2)(xiv)(A), Contaminated equipment require labels in accordance with (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(i)(H) respectively. Also paragraph (d)(4)(iii), Regulated Waste, contains several labeling requirements to be in accordance with (g)(1)(i) of the standard. Also, see “Laundry,” above, for discussion of labeling requirements.


4 The Agency has no annualized cost associated with enforcing the Standard. OSHA would only review records in the context of an investigation of a particular employer to determine compliance with the Standard. These activities are outside the scope of the PRA. See 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(2). While NIOSH may use records collected from employers for research purposes, the Agency does not anticipate NIOSH to request employers to make available records during the approval period. Therefore, the burden for the employer to make this information available to NIOSH is zero.


5 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_12172020.htm

6 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


7 The agency is revising the ICR to indicate that a 2-dose vaccination series is now permitted under recent CDC guidelines. As the agency does not have data to indicate the proportion of vaccine series that are administered using the 2-dose versus the original 3-dose frequency, the agency retains the 3-dose frequency in the ICR calculations. While this is likely an overestimate, the agency is choosing to be conservative in its calculations until and unless more data becomes available.

8 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


9 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


10 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


11 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


12Healthcare professional is defined by CDC as any person (e.g., an employee, student, contractor, attending clinician, public safety worker, or volunteer) whose activities involve contact with patients or with blood or other body fluids from patients in a health-care or laboratory setting.

13 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


14 OSHA has adopted the International Health Care Worker Safety Center (IHCSWS) estimate of 590,164 needlestick and sharp injuries occur annually. Of these about 1-2% of these involve source patients who are HIV positive. For purposes of calculating burden hours and costs OSHA has assumed 1.5%.

15 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


16 Calculations are found in Table 15

17 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.


18 See “Bloodborne Pathogens Standard ICR Spreadsheet Tables 1-19 (2021)”, uploaded to the docket and provided in ROCIS Supplementary Documents as a separate attachment.

19 OSHA uses the International Health Care Worker Safety Center estimate of 590,164 annual needlestick and sharps injuries taken from previous ICRs.

20 The agency is required to use unrounded burden hour and cost numbers and to display the unrounded numbers to the hundredth decimal point. Therefore, calculations displayed in this summary table and elsewhere in the Supporting Statement, which are based on more detailed numbers in supporting spreadsheets, may not calculate exactly to the totals.


21 National Clinician's Postexposure Hotline, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

22 The cost for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen is estimated to be $80.00 to $100.00 per person. For purposes of estimating burden hours and costs, OSHA estimated the cost to be $90.00.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
AuthorOSHA_User
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-07-28

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy