Division of Overdose Prevention Technical Assistance Hub
Attachment 4. Annual OD2A Technical Assistance Survey
Form Approved
OMB No. 0920-XXXX
Exp. Date: XX-XX-XXXX
Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 13 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Attn: OMB-PRA (0920-New)
overdose data to action (OD2A) ANNUAL Technical Assistance (TA) Survey
ICF, under contract with the Center for Disease Control (CDC), manages and evaluates the Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) technical assistance (TA).This survey is intended to gather your feedback regarding the perceived quality and effectiveness of different types of TA offered through the DOP OD2A TA program. Our goal is to understand which types of assistance best support your work. The data collected by this survey will help inform CDC decisions related to the types of support OD2A recipients.
The survey has been pre-populated to reflect the activities and other resources your organization has accessed during the last 18 months (Date to Date). The survey should reflect the organization—for example, if you did not attend a particular TA activity, but a colleague at your organization did participate, multiple respondents may contribute to the survey. The survey is designed to take approximately 13 minutes to complete.
Your participation is voluntary. You may refuse to answer any questions.
ICF will maintain your responses in a secure system. ICF will have access to your contact information when you complete this survey. However, ICF will aggregate and de-identify responses when reporting to CDC. ICF will not link your name with your individual responses in any reports to CDC. ICF will maintain your responses in a secure manner.
There are no right or wrong answers or ideas—we want to hear your experiences and opinions.
There are no risks to you or your organization for participating in this survey. The survey data will be used to inform subsequent training and TA efforts.
If you have questions about the survey or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, contact Megan Brooks at [email protected].
I have read the information above and agree to participate
Agree, continue to the survey
Please indicate the OD2A recipient organization you are affiliated with:
Create drop down list of organizations
Alabama Department of Public Health |
Georgia Department of Public Health |
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services |
Alaska Department of Health & Social Services |
Hamilton County General Health District (OH) |
Ohio Department of Health |
Allegheny County Health Department (PA) |
Harris County (TX) |
Oklahoma State Department of Health |
Arizona Department of Health Services |
Hawaii State Department of Health-Behavioral Health Administration |
Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division |
Arkansas Department of Health |
Health Research, Inc. (New York State Department of Health) |
Pennsylvania Department of Health |
Baltimore County Government (MD) |
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare |
Philadelphia Department of Public Health (PA) |
California Department of Public Health |
Illinois Department of Public Health |
Puerto Rico Department of Health |
City of Chicago, Department of Public Health |
Indiana State Department of Health |
Rhode Island Department of Health |
Colorado Dept of Public Health & Environment |
Iowa Department of Public Health |
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control |
Commonwealth Healthcare Corporation (Northern Marianna Islands) |
Kansas Department of Health and Environment |
South Dakota Department of Health |
Commonwealth of Massachusetts |
Louisiana Office of Public Health |
Southern Nevada Health District (Clark County, NV ) |
Connecticut Department of Public Health |
Maine Department of Health and Human Services |
Tennessee Department of Health |
County of Riverside Department of Public Health (CA) |
Maricopa County (AZ) |
Thomes E Dobbs (Mississippi State Department of Health) |
County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency |
Maryland Department of Health |
University of Kentucky Research Foundation |
Cuyahoga County Board of Health (OH) |
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services |
Utah Department of Health |
Delaware Department of Health and Social Services |
Minnesota Department of Health |
Vermont State Agency of Human Services |
District of Columbia Department of Health |
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services |
Virginia Department of Health |
Florida Department of Health |
Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services |
Washington State Department of Health |
Florida Department of Health in Broward County (FL) |
Nebraska Dept of Health and Human Services |
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources |
Florida Department of Health in Duval County |
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services |
Wisconsin Department of Health Services |
Florida Department of Health, Palm Beach County (FL) |
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services |
|
Franklin County Board of Commissioners/Public Health (OH) |
New Jersey Department of Health |
|
Fund for Public Health in New York, Inc. (NYC Health) |
New Mexico Department of Health |
|
TA overall
Thinking about the TA you accessed in the last 18 months (e.g., webinars, one-on-one consultation, peer-to-peer, trainings, electronic resources, site visits), please rate your agreement with the following statements.
Dimensions to be assessed |
Strongly disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly agree |
No opinion/not applicable |
I understand the purpose of TA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology was used appropriately to support TA delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of communication related to TA were clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA was provided in a timely manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA providers were responsive to my needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA supported implementation of our OD2A project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA providers were professional and courteous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA was aligned to my needs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA was aligned with my organization’s capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was helpful to hear about examples from other jurisdictions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was aware of the technical assistance options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each of the following strategies and activities, please indicate your agreement with the following statement: The TA I received helped me implement my work plan related to this strategy.
Strategy for Assessment |
Strongly disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Strongly agree |
No opinion/not applicable |
Strategy 1. Collect and disseminate timeline emergency department data on suspected all drug, all opioid, heroin and all stimulant overdoses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 2. Collect and disseminate descriptions of drug overdose death circumstances using death certificates and medical examiner/coroner data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 3. Implement innovative surveillance to support NOFO interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 4. Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 5. Integration of State and Local Prevention and Response Efforts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 6. Establishing Linkages to Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 7. Providers and Health Systems Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 8. Partnerships with Public Safety and First responders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 9. Empowering Individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 10. Prevention Innovation Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please rate the following TA modalities on their importance in helping achieve your OD2A work plan objectives: (Check one in each column).
Modality |
Very Important |
Important |
Fairly Important |
Slightly Important |
Not at all Important |
Not applicable |
One-on-one virtual technical assistance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conference calls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webinars/ virtual training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer-to-peer exchanges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site visits or in-person one-on-one technical assistance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-person group training event |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-library (resources) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helpdesk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please rate the following TA providers on their importance in helping achieve your OD2A work plan objectives: (Check one in each column).
Modality |
Very Important |
Important |
Fairly Important |
Slightly Important |
Not at all Important |
Not applicable |
CDC State Support Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other CDC experts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDC’s partners (NACCHO, ASTHO, CSTE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other experts external to CDC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each of the following strategies and activities, please indicate which modality and which provider was most helpful, and least helpful, to implement your workplan.
Strategy for Assessment |
MOST helpful (Select one modality and one provider per strategy) |
LEAST helpful (Select one modality and one provider per strategy) |
Strategy 1. Collect and disseminate timeline emergency department data on suspected all drug, all opioid, heroin and all stimulant overdoses |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 2. Collect and disseminate descriptions of drug overdose death circumstances using death certificates and medical examiner/coroner data |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 3. Implement innovative surveillance to support NOFO interventions |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 4. Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 5. Integration of State and Local Prevention and Response Efforts |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 6. Establishing Linkages to Care |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 7. Providers and Health Systems Support |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 8. Partnerships with Public Safety and First responders |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 9. Empowering Individuals |
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy 10. Prevention Innovation Project |
|
|
|
|
What is your preferred way to receive technical assistance? [INSERT drop down with delivery modality]
Thinking about the last 18 months of OD2A support, please indicate if your jurisdiction experienced any of the following challenges accessing or participating in TA. [Drop down will be provided.]
Barriers and Challenges to Access and Participation |
Topics were not relevant to my work |
Scheduling issues |
Lack of adequate notice for upcoming events |
Competing priorities limited my TA participation |
While the topics were relevant, the specific speakers were not interesting or appealing |
No staff availability to attend |
The TA was overly burdensome |
Content level seemed too low for our organization |
Content level seemed too high for our organization |
Technology |
Others |
Please tell us how the TA received has impacted your agency or organization.
What suggestions do you have for improving TA?
What additional TA needs do you or your organization have?
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 0000-00-00 |