Survey Instrument
Version Date: 20220316
This document includes the questions and the text that will be included on the CRU-Cooperator Network Survey. Blue italicized text will not be shown to respondents in the survey. This includes statements regarding the justification of questions, question design descriptions, and skip logic.
In survey text: Welcome! This study is sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units Program (CRU). The purpose of this survey is to collect information to help the CRU understand the needs of collaborators and to understand how well existing CRU partnerships meet those needs. This work is being undertaken by Sarah Vogel, a PhD student at the University of Maine and co-advisors Joe Zydlewski (Unit Leader, Maine CRU) and Cyndy Loftin (Supervisor, Northeast Region CRU).
We estimate it will take an average of 30 minutes to complete this survey. If you need to stop at any time during the survey, you can exit and re-enter the survey to finish it at another time. Please use the save button to save your progress if you cannot complete the entire survey in one sitting.
This survey is adaptive - the questions you are asked are based on your answers as you go. Therefore, some questions must be answered, and the survey software will prompt you to enter your responses.
In any public release of survey results, no data will be disclosed that could be used to match your responses with your identity.
Providing this information is completely voluntary and there is no penalty if you choose not to respond. However, maximum participation is encouraged so that the data will be complete and representative.
Privacy Act Statement: submit your survey response. However, if you do not provide contact information, we may not be able to contact you for additional information to verify your responses. If you do provide contact information, this information will not be shared with any other organization and will only be used to initiate follow-up communication about this project if needed. The records for this collection will be maintained in the appropriate Privacy Act System of Records identified as [DOI Social Networks (Interior/USGS-8) published at 76 FR 44033, 7/22/2011]. Paperwork Reduction Act statements: [16 U.S.C. 1a7] authorized collection of this information. This information will be used by the U.S. Geological Survey to better serve the public. Response to this request is voluntary. We estimate that it will take in order to You are not required to provide your contact information 30 minutes to prepare and respond to this collection. We will not distribute responses associated with you as an individual. We ask you for some basic contact information to help us interpret the results and, if needed, to contact you for clarification.
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.) requires us to inform you that this information is being collected to further the mission of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units Program (CRU). Reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions and completing the survey. Please direct any comments regarding this collection to the USGS Information Collection Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 807, Reston, VA, 20192. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Question # |
Question |
CON.1 |
Please indicate your consent to complete this survey below.
|
In survey text:
ABOUT THE COOPERATIVE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH UNITS PROGRAM
Established in 1935 to meet the need for trained professionals in the growing field of wildlife management, the program currently consists of 41 Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units located on university campuses in 39 States and supports 119 research scientist positions when fully funded.
The threefold mission of the CRU program is to:
Conduct scientific research for the management of fish, wildlife, and other natural resources;
Provide technical assistance to natural resource managers in the application of scientific information to natural resource policy and management; and
Train future natural resource professionals.
Each unit is a unique partnership among the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a host university, one or more state agencies, and the Wildlife Management Institute. They are called Coop Units because each cooperator plays a role in the staffing, funding, and directing of the units.
Together, the CRU program comprises a vast network of people and organizations linked by shared conservation, education, and research goals. You have received this survey because you are a part of this network. Knowing about your role and relationships within the network will help us assess the efficiency, impact, and needs of the program.
Question # |
Question |
INT.1 and INT.2 are designed to gather information about the respondents’ current employment, level of leadership, and responsibilities within their organization. These questions are important for assessing and contextualizing the universe of respondents and attributing responses to different leadership strata. |
|
INT.1 |
First, help us get to know you and the work you do. How many years have you been in your current role, organization, and the natural resources field in general? (Matrix-style table with options: <1, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 10-19, 20-29, and >30)
|
INT.2 |
What best describes the level of supervisory responsibility you hold in your organization? The levels of management in this question are based on The Essentials of Management (DuBrin, 2009).
|
INT.3 – INT.6 are designed to gather information about how frequently decision-making falls to different management levels within the respondent’s organization. Here, “research” has been divided into four sections (i.e., identification of need, planning, funding, and execution). These questions are important for identifying the amount of agency regarding research decisions that CRU Cooperators may hold. |
|
INT.3 |
In your organization how often are the following personnel responsible for identifying knowledge gaps which may be in need of research? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always)
|
INT.4 |
How often are the following personnel responsible for planning research projects? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always)
|
INT.5 |
How often are the following personnel responsible for allocating funding to support research projects? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always)
|
INT.6 |
How often are the following personnel responsible for managing the execution of research projects? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always)
|
INT.7 and INT.8 are designed to gather information about the respondent’s past work history and the flow of human capital from one organization to another. This is important for gauging trends in the sources of employment within the network and to gauge prior knowledge of the CRU program. |
|
INT.7 |
Not including your current position, which other natural resource-based sectors/organizations have you worked in? Select all that apply.
|
INT.8 |
As a student were you affiliated with a Cooperative Research Unit in any capacity? Select all that apply.
|
INT.9 |
How familiar are you with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units program? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Not at all familiar, 2=Slightly familiar, 3=Moderately familiar, 4=Very familiar, 5=Extremely familiar) |
INT.10 |
Are you a federal employee of the U.S. Geological Survey's Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units program (i.e., unit scientist, headquarters personnel, etc.)?
|
This section will be available to self-identified CRU employees only.
Question # |
Question |
OA.CRU.1 and OA.CRU.2 are designed to identify the home Coop Unit of the CRU scientist. |
|
OA.CRU.1 |
Which best describes your position with the CRU?
|
OA.CRU.2 |
Which Coop Unit do you consider your home Unit? (Drop down list of 41 Coop Units and headquarters) |
OA.CRU.3 – OA.CRU.13 are designed to determine how respondents perceive their relationships with official and unofficial cooperator groups and to identify strengths and challenges within their Coop Unit. These data will be linked to information from the CRU-Cooperator network analysis to determine trends and mismatches in perceptions. |
|
OA.CRU.3 |
In general, how do you characterize the relationships between your Coop Unit and the OFFICIAL Cooperator groups? If you do not interact with a Cooperator, please select "Not applicable." (Slider from “One of the worst” to “One of the best” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
OA.CRU.4 |
From your perspective, how effective is your Coop Unit at meeting the needs of your OFFICIAL Cooperators? If you do not interact with a Cooperator, please select "Not applicable." (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
OA.CRU.5 |
How often do you MEET IN PERSON with personnel from your OFFICIAL Cooperator groups? If you do not meet with a Cooperator in person, please select "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Once a year, 2=Several times a year, 3=Every 1-2 months, 4=Every 1-2 weeks, 5=Several times a week, 99=Not applicable)
|
OA.CRU.6 |
How often do you MEET VIA PHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE with personnel from your OFFICIAL Cooperator groups? If you do not meet with a Cooperator in this way, please select "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Once a year, 2=Several times a year, 3=Every 1-2 months, 4=Every 1-2 weeks, 5=Several times a week, 99=Not applicable)
|
OA.CRU.7 |
In general, how do you characterize the relationships between your Coop Unit and the UNOFFICIAL cooperators? Please list any other categories that were not included. If you do not interact with a cooperator, please select "Not applicable." (Slider from “One of the worst” to “One of the best” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
OA.CRU.8 |
In general, how effective is your Coop Unit at meeting the needs of your UNOFFICIAL cooperators? Please list any other categories that were not included. If you do not interact with a cooperator, please select "Not applicable." (Slider from “One of the worst” to “One of the best” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
OA.CRU.9 |
How often do you MEET IN PERSON with personnel from your UNOFFICIAL Cooperator groups? If you do not meet with a Cooperator in person, please select "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Once a year, 2=Several times a year, 3=Every 1-2 months, 4=Every 1-2 weeks, 5=Several times a week, 99=Not applicable)
|
OA.CRU.10 |
How often do you MEET VIA PHONE OR VIDEOCONFERENCE with personnel from your UNOFFICIAL Cooperator groups? If you do not meet with a Cooperator in this way, please select "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Once a year, 2=Several times a year, 3=Every 1-2 months, 4=Every 1-2 weeks, 5=Several times a week, 99=Not applicable)
|
OA.CRU.11 |
What do you consider the biggest strengths of your Coop Unit? In other words, what is your Coop Unit doing well? (fill in) |
OA.CRU.12 |
What do you consider the biggest challenges for your Coop Unit? In other words, what would you like to see your Coop Unit doing better on? (fill in) |
OA.CRU.13 |
What do you consider the biggest obstacles preventing your Coop Unit from achieving your goals relative to the previous question? (fill in) |
This section will be available to non-CRU employees only.
In survey text: The following section is based on the objectives of the CRU which are outlined in the Cooperative Agreements for each Coop Unit. The agreements outline the purpose, objectives, and responsibilities of the partners.
Please reflect on your experiences with the CRU in the past several years. On average, please rank how effective you feel the program is at meeting its objectives.
Question # |
Question |
EMO.1 – EMO.6 address objectives which are outlined in the CRU Cooperative Agreements. This section is meant to be taken by all cooperators and CRU members to determine trends in meeting the objectives and possible mismatches in expectations and perception among cooperators. |
|
EMO.1 |
Providing technical and professional education in the fields of natural resource sciences? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.2 |
Making information (i.e., facts, methods, literature, and findings) available to the following? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.3 |
Disseminating research findings in the following ways? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.4 |
Conducting research into the ecology, biology and management of fish, wildlife, and other renewable natural resources? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.5 |
Addressing information needs of the cooperators? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.6 |
Meeting research expectations at different spatial scales? (Slider from “Not effective at all” to “Extremely effective” with a “Not applicable” choice)
|
EMO.7 – EMO.10 are meant to be answered by Cooperators of the CRU program and will not be shown to CRU personnel. They are designed to gage collaboration likelihood and the perceived value of CRU outputs. This information is important for identifying inconsistencies among user groups, gaps in how well the CRU fulfills its mission, and opportunities for improvement. |
|
EMO.7 |
Please indicate how likely you are to collaborate with a CRU scientist in the next two years? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Very unlikely, 2=Unlikely, 3=Neither, 4=Likely, 5=Very likely, 98=Do not know) |
EMO.8 |
What is your main reason for this response? (short answer) |
|
Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements. (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neither, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree, 98=Do not know)
|
Questions in this section are specifically intended to be used to build a CRU-Cooperator network using Social Network Analysis to draw inferences about how relationships drive outcomes. With this analysis it is necessary to know who the network actors are (i.e., the Cooperators) and the relationships between them (i.e., research planning, funding, and execution). Results will be used to examine the relationship structure of the CRU program at different management levels (e.g., federal, state, and unit management) as well as among cooperators (e.g., USFWS, USGS, WMI, universities, and state agencies; Eisenberg & Swanson, 1996; Cummings & Kiesler, 2005). This is the longest section in the survey because respondents are asked to self-identify the people with whom they form research collaborations (up to five per organization).
In survey text: In this section we would like to know more about how you address research needs within your own organization. We consider research to be investigations into the ecology, biology and management of fish, wildlife, and other renewable natural resources. We are specifically interested in who you enter research collaborations with, in terms of research planning, funding, and execution. Please answer these questions from the perspective of your current role and responsibilities.
Question # |
Question |
RCN.1 gauges the respondent’s preference for addressing research needs internally or externally. RCN.2 is meant to filter the respondent to particular questions in the network survey depending on their answers. |
|
RCN.1 |
When you identify research needs in your organization, how do you typically address those needs? (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Do not prefer, 2=Prefer slightly, 3=Prefer a moderate amount, 4=Prefer a lot, 5=Prefer a great deal, 99=Not applicable)
|
RCN.2 |
When you collaborate (internally or externally), how often do you seek research collaborations with people from the following broad groups? If a choice is not available to you, please choose “Not applicable.” (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable)
|
RCN.3 |
If you indicated you would never collaborate with someone from the CRU, please provide a brief summary of why you chose your response. (short answer) |
The following questions are designed to capture information about research collaborations in terms of planning, funding, and execution. The inclusion of these questions will be reliant on how respondents answer RCN.2, self-reported collaborations with the CRU (RCN.4a-d), state agencies (RCN.5a-e), universities (RCN.6a-e), USFWS (RCN.7a-d), USGS (RCN.8), and the WMI (RCN.9a-d). |
|
RCN.4a |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from the CRU to meet your research needs. The following list includes CRU scientists and CRU headquarter personnel. Please select the people you collaborate with. If a person is not listed, please select other. (Drop down list of unit and headquarters personnel with multiple selections possible) |
RCN.4b |
How often do you collaborate in planning research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.4a: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.4c |
How often do you collaborate in funding research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.4a: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.4d |
How often do you collaborate in executing research with from the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.4a: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.5a |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from state agencies to meet your research needs. The following list includes state natural resources agencies. Please select all agencies you collaborate with. If an agency is not listed, please select “Other.” (Drop down list of state agencies with multiple selections possible) |
RCN.5b |
How often do you seek research collaborations with people from the agencies you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.4a; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.5c |
In the past several years, which state agency personnel have you worked with to fulfil your research needs? Please list them below (up to 5) and indicate how often you collaborate in planning research with them. (Fill in options; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.5d |
How often do you collaborate in funding research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.5c: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.5e |
How often do you collaborate in executing research with from the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.5c: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.6a |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from universities to meet your research needs. The following list includes universities which host Cooperative Research Units. Please select all universities you collaborate with. If a university is not listed, please select “Other.” (Drop down list of universities with multiple selections possible) |
RCN.6b |
How often do you seek research collaborations with the people from the universities you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.4a; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.6c |
In the past several years, which university personnel have you worked with to fulfil your research needs? Please list them below (up to 5) and indicate how often you collaborate in planning research with them. (Fill in options; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.6d |
How often do you collaborate in funding research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.6c: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.6e |
How often do you collaborate in executing research with from the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.6c: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.7a |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to meet your research needs. Please indicate how often you seek research collaborations with people from the following offices? If collaborations with an office are not relevant to your work, please select "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable)
|
RCN.7b |
In the past several years, which U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel have you worked with to fulfil your research needs? Please list them below (up to 5) and indicate how often you collaborate in planning research with them. (Fill in options; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.7c |
How often do you collaborate in funding research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.7b: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.7d |
How often do you collaborate in executing research with from the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.7b: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.8 |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from the U.S. Geological Survey to meet your research needs. Please indicate how often you seek research collaborations with people from the following programs or centers? If collaborations with an office are not relevant to your work, please select "Not applicable." (Fill in options; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable)
|
RCN.9a |
You indicated that you collaborate with personnel from the Wildlife Management Institute to meet your research needs. The following list includes WMI personnel. Please select all the people you collaborate with. If a person is not listed, please select “Other.” (Drop down list of universities with multiple selections possible) |
RCN.9b |
How often do you collaborate in planning research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.9a; Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.9c |
How often do you collaborate in funding research with the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.7b: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
RCN.9d |
How often do you collaborate in executing research with from the people you selected? (Choices carried forward from RCN.7b: Matrix-style table with Likert choices: 1=Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=About half the time, 4=Most of the time, 5=Always, 99=Not applicable) |
The following questions are designed to assess perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion within the organizations and agencies that compose the CRU network. Addressing this issue is an ongoing challenge and has been highlighted as an administrative goal by most organizations in the network. Answers supplied here are important for understanding the current perceptions of DEI, characterizing differences among groups, and identifying areas for improvement. Questions in this section have been informed by the Federal Organizational Assessment Survey (OPM).
In survey text: The following questions are designed to assess perceptions of diversity, equity, and inclusion within your organization.
Question # |
Question |
DEI.1 |
Please indicate the importance you place on different types of diversity within your organization. (Continuous slider from “Not important at all” to “Extremely important”)
|
DEI.2 |
How useful are the following policies/programs in addressing diversity in your organization? If you are unsure or the statement does not apply, please select "Do not know" or "Not applicable." (Matrix-style table in standard Likert format for each statement: 1=“Not at all useful,” 2=“Slightly useful,” 3=“Moderately useful,” 4=“Very useful,” 5=“Extremely useful,” “Do not know,” and “Not applicable”)
|
DEI.3 |
How strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements? If you are unsure, please select "Do not know." (Matrix-style table in standard Likert format for each statement: 1=“Not at all useful,” 2=“Slightly useful,” 3=“Moderately useful,” 4=“Very useful,” 5=“Extremely useful,” “Do not know,” and “Not applicable”)
|
DEI.4 |
What diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts are working well at your organization or agency? (Short answer) |
DEI.5 |
What diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts are NOT working well at your organization or agency? (Short answer) |
The following questions are intended to gather information about respondents’ demographic data. This information is important for contextualizing the representativeness of the sample and weighting for variation in demographic features. This information also directly informs specific inquiries into the demographic conditions of the units, cooperators, and the program as a whole.
In survey text: The following demographic questions are important for contextualizing the survey data and assessing the representativeness of responses. Your responses will be kept confidential and combined with other responses when reporting any results.
Question # |
Question |
Dem.1-5) The collection of this data is necessary for three reasons: 1) to characterize the demographic composition of the CRU-Cooperator network, an important step in benchmarking current diversity metrics and assessing progress; 2) to ensure that responses do not assume representativeness for any demographic group; and 3) to relate demographic characteristics to trends in network building and information sharing with in the CRU. |
|
Dem.1 |
What sex do you most identify with?
|
Dem.2 |
What is your age?
|
Dem.3 |
What race do you identify with? (Select one or more) Responses for this question include the five minimum categories required by OMB (U.S. Census Bureau, 2021).
|
Dem.4 |
What is the highest level of school you have completed or the highest degree you have received?
|
Dem.5 |
How much do you earn annually?
|
Dem.6 |
Would you be willing to participate in future surveys, interviews, or workshops?
|
Dem.7 |
Please provide you name and preferred contact information. (short answer) |
End of the survey
In survey text: Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey. Your answers, along with other respondents’, will be used to help understand the needs of CRU collaborators and to understand how well existing CRU partnerships meet those needs. In any public release of survey results, no data will be disclosed that could be used to match your responses with your identity. This work is being undertaken by Sarah Vogel, a PhD student at the University of Maine and co-advisors Joe Zydlewski (Unit Leader, Maine CRU) and Cyndy Loftin (Supervisor, Northeast Region CRU). For additional information or questions, please contact [email protected].
Cummings, J.N. and S. Kiesler. 2005. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35:703-722.
DuBrin, Andrew J. (2009). Essentials of management (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Business & Economics. ISBN 978-0-324-35389-1.
Eisenberg, M. and N. Swanson. 1996. Organizational network analysis as a tool for program evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions 19: 488-507.
U.S. Census Bureau (2021) About the Topic of Race. Web: https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html
(OPM) U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Services for Agencies: Assessment and Evaluation. Web: https://www.opm.gov/services-for-agencies/assessment-evaluation/surveys-and-related-services/#url=Organizational-Assessment-Survey
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Author | Sarah Vogel |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2022-10-04 |