30 Day FRN

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 160 / Monday, August 23, 2021 / Notices
rainfall, changing weather patterns,
riverine and coastal erosion, and shifts
in future development.
• Particularly where comments relate
to the CRS program’s costs or benefits,
comments will be most useful if there
are data and experience under the
program available to ascertain the
program’s actual impact.
C. List of Questions for Commenters

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

The below non-exhaustive list of
questions is meant to assist members of
the public in the formulation of
comments and is not intended to restrict
the issues that commenters may
address:
(1) What are the strengths of the
current CRS program? What
components of the program are
currently working well and why?
(2) What are the challenges with the
current CRS program that need to be
addressed and why? How can the CRS
program be modified, expanded, or
streamlined to better address or resolve
these challenges?
(3) While the CRS program is
technically available to all compliant
NFIP communities, is access to the CRS
program equitable for all communities?
If not, what changes to the CRS program
could make it more equitable for all
communities? How could the CRS
program provide better outreach to
disadvantaged communities to
encourage participation? How could the
CRS program provide better outreach to
households in disadvantaged
communities to encourage participation
in the NFIP?
(4) How could the CRS program better
promote and/or incentivize improved
reduction of future conditions and risks
such as climate change, sea-level rise,
urban flooding, and future
development?
(5) How could the CRS program better
address the mitigation of repetitive loss/
severe repetitive loss 14 properties and
how could FEMA further leverage the
CRS program to achieve mitigation of
14 ‘‘Repetitive loss properties’’ are those
properties for which two or more claims of more
than $1,000 have been paid by the NFIP within any
10-year period since 1978. ‘‘Severe repetitive loss
properties’’ are those as defined in the Flood
Insurance Reform Act of 2004 that are one-four
family properties that have had four or more claims
of more than $5,000 or two to three claims that
cumulatively exceed the building’s value. CRS
considers non-residential buildings that also meet
these criteria to be severe repetitive loss properties.
See National Flood Insurance Program Community
Rating System Coordinator’s Manual 2017 and
National Flood Insurance Program Community
Rating System Addendum to the 2017 CRS
Coordinator’s Manual at https://www.fema.gov/
floodplain-management/community-rating-system
(last accessed May 20, 2021).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:11 Aug 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

repetitive loss/severe repetitive loss
properties?
(6) How can the CRS program be
modified, expanded, or streamlined to
best incentivize participation by
communities and flood insurance
policyholders to become more resilient
and lower their vulnerability to flood
risk?
(7) How can the CRS program better
incentivize floodplain management, risk
management, and/or risk reduction
efforts for communities through CRS
discounts, grants, trainings, technical
assistance or other means? Which efforts
are most critical for the CRS program to
support?
(8) What existing sources of data can
FEMA leverage to better assist
communities to assess, communicate,
and drive the reduction of current and
future flood risk? Can FEMA leverage
new technologies to modify or
streamline the CRS program? If so, what
are they and how can FEMA use new
technologies to achieve the statutory
objectives of the program?
(9) The CRS program provides credits
for flood risk reduction activities. Are
there flood risk reduction activities that
are not currently given credit within the
CRS program that should be? If so, what
are they and why? Are there flood risk
reduction activities that are currently
given excessive credit within the CRS
program than they should be given? If
so, what are they and why? Should the
CRS program provide a list of optional
risk reduction activities for
communities to choose from or a list of
required risk reduction activities, and
why?
(10) What successful approaches have
been taken by State, local, Tribal, and
Territorial governments that the CRS
program could leverage to better support
community participation in the CRS
program? In what ways could the CRS
program better support States, Tribes,
Territories and Regions, and flood
control and water management districts
to improve community participation in
the program? What innovative changes
could the CRS program make to be
simpler for communities to join and
maintain participation?
(11) How could the CRS program
provide better outreach to
disadvantaged communities to
encourage participation? How could the
CRS program provide better outreach to
households in disadvantaged
communities to encourage participation
in the NFIP?
(11) In what ways could the CRS
program facilitate collaboration across
jurisdictional boundaries to support a
community’s ability to reduce flood
risk? How could the CRS program be

PO 00000

Frm 00082

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

47131

modified, expanded, or streamlined to
allow for multi-jurisdictional
collaboration efforts to receive credit
under the CRS program?
(12) What opportunities exist for the
CRS program to better integrate with
other entities and/or programs? For
example, in what specific ways could
the CRS program better work and
integrate with State, local, Tribal, and
Territorial programs, including but not
limited to, floodplain management,
emergency services, land use planning
and building code administration
capital improvement, transportation,
redevelopment, pre- and post-disaster
recovery, climate adaptation, hazard
mitigation planning, watershed
management, and/or wetlands, riparian,
or environmental management
programs? In what specific ways could
the CRS program better work and
integrate with Federal disaster
assistance programs or Federal
mitigation programs?
FEMA notes that this notice is issued
solely for information and programplanning purposes. Responses to this
notice do not bind FEMA to any further
actions related to the response.
Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021–18167 Filed 8–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–47–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket Number DHS–2021–0009]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Vulnerability Discovery
Program, 1601–0028
Department of Homeland
Security, (DHS).
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments; extension without change of
a currently approved collection, 1601–
0028.
AGENCY:

The Department of Homeland
Security, will submit the following
Information Collection Request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. DHS previously
published this information collection
request (ICR) in the Federal Register on
Friday, March 19, 2021 for a 60-day
public comment period. There were
three public comments received by
DHS. The purpose of this notice is to
allow additional 30-days for public
comments.

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM

23AUN1

47132

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 160 / Monday, August 23, 2021 / Notices

Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until September 22,
2021. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Security
vulnerabilities, defined in section
102(17) of the Cybersecurity Information
Sharing Act of 2015, are any attribute of
hardware, software, process, or
procedure that could enable or facilitate
the defeat of a security control. Security
vulnerability mitigation is a process
starting with discovery of the
vulnerability leading to applying some
solution to resolve the vulnerability.
There is constantly a search for security
vulnerabilities within information
systems, from individuals or nation
states wishing to bypass security
controls to gain invaluable information,
to researchers seeking knowledge in the
field of cyber security. Bypassing such
security controls in the DHS and other
Federal Agencies information systems
can cause catastrophic damage
including but not limited to loss in
Personally Identifiable Information (PII),
sensitive information gathering, and
data manipulation.
Pursuant to section 101 of the
Strengthening and Enhancing Cybercapabilities by Utilizing Risk Exposure
Technology Act, (commonly known as
the SECURE Technologies Act)
individuals, organizations, and/or
companies may submit any discovered
security vulnerabilities found associated
with the information system of any
Federal agency. This collection would
be used by these individuals,
organizations, and/or companies who
choose to submit a discovered
vulnerability found associated with the
information system of any Federal
agency.
Specifically, DHS and Federal
cybersecurity agencies are working to
address the recently discovered
SolarWinds hack on Federal agencies
and organizations around the world.
While DHS had previously obtained
approval to collect this information on
its own behalf, recent cyber attacks
exploiting vulnerabilities have
exemplified the need to have this
capability government-wide. In 2020, a
major cyberattack, nicknamed the
SolarWinds cyberattack, by a group

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

DATES:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:11 Aug 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

backed by a foreign government
penetrated thousands of organizations
globally including multiple parts of the
United States federal government,
leading to a series of data breaches. The
cyberattack and data breach were
reported to be among the worst cyberespionage incidents ever suffered by the
U.S., due to the sensitivity and high
profile of the targets and the long
duration (eight to nine months) in
which the hackers had access. Affected
organizations worldwide included
NATO, the U.K. government, the
European Parliament, Microsoft and
others.
Public Law 116–283, Sec. 1705
(which amended 44 U.S.C. 3553)
permits extensive sharing of information
regarding cybersecurity and the
protection of information and
information systems from cybersecurity
risks between Federal Agencies covered
by the Federal Information Security
Modernization Act and the Department
of Homeland Security. This unique
authority makes DHS well positioned to
host the approval of this information
collection on behalf of other Federal
agencies.
DHS is requesting pursuant to 44 US
Code 3509, that the information
collection be designated for any Federal
agencies ability to utilize the
standardized DHS online form to collect
their own agency’s vulnerability
information and post the information on
their own agency websites.
The form will include the following
essential information:
• Vulnerable host(s)
• Necessary information for
reproducing the security vulnerability
• Remediation or suggestions for
remediation of the vulnerability
• Potential impact on host, if not
remediated
This form will allow Federal agencies
to complete the following actions; (1)
allow the individuals, organizations,
and/or companies who discover
vulnerabilities in the information
systems to report their findings to the
agency, and (2) provide the agencies
initial insight into any newly discovered
vulnerabilities, as well as zero-day
vulnerabilities in order to mitigate the
security issues prior to malicious actors
acting upon the vulnerability for
malicious intent.
The form will also benefit researchers
and will provide a safe and lawful
method to practice and discover new
cyber methods to discover the
vulnerabilities. It will provide the same
benefit to Federal agencies and will
promote the enhancement of Federal
information system security policies.

PO 00000

Frm 00083

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Respondents will be able to submit
their information directly to the agency
in which they would like to report a
vulnerability. Federal Agencies will
provide the form electronically via their
agencies website.
The information collected does not
have an impact on small business or
other small entities.
The collection of this information
related to the discovery of security
vulnerabilities by individuals,
organizations, and/or companies is
needed to fulfill the congressional
mandate in Section 101 of the SECURE
Technologies Act related to creating
Vulnerability Disclosure Policies. In
addition, without the ability to collect
information on newly discovered
security vulnerabilities associated with
Federal agency information systems,
Federal agencies will rely solely on the
internal security personnel and/or the
discovery through a post occurrence
breach of security controls.
There are no assurances of
confidentiality provide. Any PII that is
collected will be for the sole purpose of
feedback and dialogue. Federal
Agencies will ensure the collection of
information is covered by a Systems of
Record Notice and will display a
Privacy Notice to the respondents.
There are no changes to the
information being collected.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Analysis
Agency: Department of Homeland
Security, (DHS).
Title: Vulnerability Discovery
Program.
OMB Number: 1601–0028.
Frequency: On Occasion.

E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM

23AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 160 / Monday, August 23, 2021 / Notices
Affected Public: State, Local and
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 3,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1
Hour.
Total Burden Hours: 3,000.
Robert Dorr,
Executive Director, Business Management
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2021–18059 Filed 8–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket Number DHS–2021–0027]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: DHS Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties Complaint and Privacy
Waiver Form
Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The Department of Homeland
Security, will submit the following
Information Collection Request (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until September 22,
2021. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this specific information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), Office for Civil Rights and Civil
Liberties (CRCL) reviews and
investigates civil rights and civil
liberties complaints filed by the public
regarding U.S. Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) policies and activities.
Under 6 U.S.C. 345 and 42 U.S.C.
2000ee–1, CRCL reviews and assesses
allegations involving a range of alleged
civil rights and civil liberties abuses,
such as:
• Discrimination based on race,
ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex,
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
disability;
• Violation of rights while in
immigration detention or as subject of
immigration enforcement;

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:11 Aug 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

• Discrimination or inappropriate
questioning related to entry into the
United States;
• Violation of due process rights,
such as the right to timely notice of
charges or access to lawyer;
• Violation of confidentiality
provisions of the Violence Against
Women Act;
• Physical abuse or any other type of
abuse;
• Denial of meaningful access to DHS
or DHS-supported programs, activities,
or services due to limited English
proficiency and
• Any other civil rights, civil
liberties, or human rights violation
related to a Department program or
activity, including allegations of
discrimination by an organization or
program that receives financial
assistance from DHS.
CRCL also reviews and investigates
human rights complaints under
Executive Order 13107, disability
accommodation complaints under
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, and inaccessible Information and
Communication Technology (ICT)
complaints under Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act, as amended by the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub.
L. 105–220), codified at 29 U.S.C. 794.
The information collected on this form
will allow CRCL to review and
investigate civil rights and civil liberties
complaints filed by the public regarding
DHS programs and activities.
CRCL submits copies all external
allegations of civil rights and civil
liberties violations within its
jurisdiction that it receives to the DHS
Office of Inspector General (OIG) for
review because OIG has the right of first
refusal to investigate any allegations. If
the OIG declines to investigate the
allegations, CRCL may investigate.
CRCL coordinates with DHS
Components and the OIG regarding
matters that CRCL opens as complaint
investigations as well as some it decides
not to investigate. In general, CRCL
shares the incoming information with
the Components involved and
coordinates with the Components
throughout a CRCL investigation. As a
result of its complaint investigations,
CRCL issues recommendations to DHS
Components to address issues of
concern and to enhance the agency’s
civil rights and civil liberties
protections. CRCL has also engaged with
Components on the implementation of
such recommendations.
In addition, the information provided
is entered into a CRCL complaint
management system (CMS) and may be
used by CRCL to track allegations and
identify trends and systemic issues that

PO 00000

Frm 00084

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

47133

are within CRCL’s jurisdiction
regardless of whether CRCL investigates
an individual allegation. CRCL has used
information from these database records
to notify DHS Components of issue
areas and locations that may warrant
closer attention.
Information can be submitted to CRCL
via U.S. mail, email, fax, or telephone
and may be initiated by members of the
public, federal agencies, or agency
personnel, non-governmental
organizations, media reports or other
sources. The use of the complaint form
is optional.
The form is in a fillable accessible
PDF format and can be submitted by
U.S. mail, email, or fax to CRCL. The
use of this form provides an efficient
means for collecting and processing
required data and information useful to
conduct an investigation. To minimize
administrative burden on complainants
and the Department, submission of
information electronically, via email, is
the fastest way to reach CRCL.
Information provided by complainants
is maintained in electronic format, so
provided the information electronically
will further minimize administrative
burden.
If a complainant is unable to or does
not wish to submit their information
electronically, information can be
submitted via U.S. mail, fax, or phone
call. It is noted on CRCL’s website that
postal mail can take up to 20 business
days. CRCL is about the launch a new
CMS that would support other means of
submitting a complaint (e.g., web portal)
and these are enhancements that will be
considered in the future.
This information collection does not
have an impact on small businesses or
other small entities.
If the information collection is not
conducted or is conducted less
frequently, CRCL may not be able to
effectively fulfill its statutory obligation
to the public to review and investigate
allegations involving alleged civil rights
and civil liberties abuses regarding DHS
polices and activities.
Consequences for not using the
fillable form include overall delays in
processing and an increased frequency
in need to follow up with complainants
to obtain the types of information
requested on the form.
The assurance of confidentiality
provided to the respondents for this
information collection will be provided
by: CRCL’s statute under 6 U.S.C. 345,
42 U.S.C. 2000ee–1; the Privacy Impact
Assessment for the CRCL Complaint
Form and Privacy Waiver; and the
Systems of Record Notice: Department
of Homeland Security/ALL–029 Civil
Rights and Civil Liberties Records

E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM

23AUN1