RI38-115_OMB_Supporting_Stmt_2021

RI38-115_OMB_Supporting_Stmt_2021.docx

Representative Payee Survey

OMB: 3206-0208

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf



OMB SUPPORTING STATEMENT


RI 38-115 – Representative Payee Survey


  1. Justification


  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


Title 5, U. S. Code, Chapter 83, Section 8345(e) and Chapter 84, Section 8466(c) provide for the payment of benefits to the representative payee of an incompetent annuitant. Title 5, U. S. Code, Chapter 83, Section 8347(a) and Chapter 84, Section 8461(g) provide that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) shall administer the provisions of the law and regulations relating to the payment of retirement benefits. RI 38-115 is designed to collect information about how the monies OPM has paid to a representative payee have been used or conserved for the benefit of the incompetent annuitant.


  1. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


OPM uses RI 38-115 to determine whether representative payees are using the benefit to support the annuitant. This information collection is needed in order to avoid paying persons who are misusing the annuities, are no longer acting as payee for the annuitant, or have failed to report an event (such as the death of the annuitant) which would terminate the annuity. The survey is not mailed to court-appointed fiduciaries. The form collects the social security number of the representative payee and the email address where the payee can be reached. RI 38-115 has been revised to update the display of the OMB control number.


  1. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

Improved information technology will not reduce the burden. The information collected cannot be obtained from other sources. However, this form is available in a PDF format on our website at www.opm.gov/forms and meets the GPEA requirements.





  1. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


The forms are prepared for individual respondents. Similar information is not available.

Duplication is minimized.


  1.  If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities
    (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize.


Information is not collected from small businesses and organizations.


  1. Describe the consequence to Federal/DHS program or policy activities if the collection of information is not conducted, or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Less frequent collection would hamper OPM efforts to oversee the payment of annuities to persons who are charged with using the money for the benefit of someone else.


  1. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

  • requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which is unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


This information collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6, except 1320.6(b). A response is required within 30 days in order to prevent payment to those who are no longer eligible.


  1. Federal Register Notice: Provide a copy and identify the date and page number of the publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


On April 2, 2021, a 60 Day Federal Register Notice was published at 86 FR 17420. No comments were received.


  1. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No gifts or payments of any kind have been provided to any individuals who are connected to this collection.


  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


This information collection is protected by the Privacy Act of 1974 and OPM regulations
(5 CFR 831.106). The routine uses of disclosure appear in the Federal Register for OPM/Central-1 (73 FR 15013, et seq., March 20, 2008).


  1. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

This information collection does not include questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement
should:


a. Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden,
and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desired. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

b. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour

burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form

83-I.

c. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections

of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of

contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not

be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.


Approximately 11,000 forms will be processed annually. The form requires
approximately 20 minutes each to complete. The annual burden of 3,667 hours is
estimated.

Form Name

Form Number

No. of Respondents

No. of Responses per Respondent

Average Burden per Response (in hours)

Total Annual Burden (in hours)

Average
Hourly
Wage Rate

Total Annual
Respondent Cost

Representative Payee Survey

RI 38-115

11,000

1

20 minutes

3,667

$7.16

$98,450.00



The Total Annual Respondent Cost is $98,450.00.


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record-keepers
resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden
shown in Items 12 and 14.)


The cost estimate should be split into two components: (1) a total capital and start-up

cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and

maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into

account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the

information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors

including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment,

the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and

start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as

purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing

equipment; and record storage facilities.


If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost

burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting

out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In

developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents

(fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use

existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking

containing the information collection as appropriate.


Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions

thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with

requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to

provide information to keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and

usual business or private practices.


There is no change in the respondent burden.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also, provide a
description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of
hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing and support staff),
and any other expense that would have been incurred without this collection of
information. You may also aggregate cost estimates for Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single
table.

The annualized cost to the Government is $34,800. This cost is derived from employee’s
salaries, staff hours required to process the forms and the cost of printing, storing and
shipping forms.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of
the OMB Form 83-I. Changes in hour burden, i.e., program changes or adjustments made
to annual reporting and recordkeeping hour and cost burden. A program change is the
result of deliberate Federal government action. All new collections and any subsequent
revisions of existing collections (e.g., the addition or deletion of questions) are recorded
as program changes. An adjustment is a change that is not the result of a deliberate
Federal government action. These changes that result from new estimates or actions not
controllable by the Federal government are recorded as adjustments.


This Information Collection Request (ICR) has been revised to update the display of the

OMB control number.


There is no change in the hour or cost burden.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for
tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used.
Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of
the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


The results of this information collection are not published.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the
information collection, explain reasons that display would be inappropriate.


The Retirement Services program office is the lone processor of the data collected on

these ICRs from approximately 2.8 million customers. The substance of each information

collection does not substantively change at each OMB renewal cycle, but according to

changes in law and regulation. These forms are printed and published (internet, intranet and

on-board systems) through various agencies for distribution to and implementation by

Government customers. Pursuant to title 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(1), it would not be appropriate to

display the OMB clearance expiration date where the form will not be revised for the

foreseeable future (e.g., because it is used to collect applicant, annuitant, or beneficiary

information required by long-standing statutory provisions), where use of the paper form is

prevalent, and where, accordingly, it will be expensive and burdensome to restock the paper

forms inventory with a new version. Last year, under current practice, Retirement Services

printed approximately 2 million documents subject to OMB clearance at a cost of

approximately $85,000. Our costs would rise substantially if additional revision cycles are

added. Lastly, by adding the OMB clearance expiration date to the existing format, the end

users of OPM’s ICRs may erroneously assume that the expiration date affects the validity of

the information collection when it is the OMB clearance expiration date and not reflective of

the substance. This may lead to additional submissions by customers, possible litigation and

increasing pressures on our Operations workloads. Therefore, we seek approval to not

display the OMB clearance expiration date on the forms and to communicate version

changes to the public via the revision date.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 “Certification
for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form 83-I.


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.




File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleOMB SUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorMEMOORE
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-06-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy