60 Day Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Notices
burden associated with this collection of
information is 2,255.
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Scott Elmore,
PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–14126 Filed 7–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement
[OMB Control Number 1653–0050]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension, Without Change,
of a Currently Approved Collection:
Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency
Service Delivery; Comment Request
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the
Paperwork Reductions Act (PRA) of
1995 the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) will submit
the following Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance. This information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register (84 FR 18564) on
May 1, 2019, allowing for a 60-day
comment period. ICE received 1
comment in connection with the 60-day
notice. The purpose of this notice is to
allow an additional 30 days for public
comments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until August 2, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
and/or suggestions regarding the item(s)
contained in this notice, especially
regarding the estimated public burden
and associated response time, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer for U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security, and
sent via electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed to
(202) 395–5806. All submissions must
include the words ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security’’ and the OMB
Control Number 1653–0050.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:23 Jul 02, 2019

Jkt 247001

Comments
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension, Without Change, of a
Currently Approved Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Generic Clearance for the Collection of
Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service
Delivery.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
Households; Farms; Business or other
for-profit; Not-for-profit institutions;
State, local or Tribal governments; The
information collection garners
qualitative customer and stakeholder
feedback in an efficient and timely
manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback provides insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provides
an early warning of issues with service,
or focuses attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

31895

operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It also allows feedback to
contribute directly to the improvement
of program management. Feedback
collected under this generic clearance
provides useful information, but it will
not yield data that can be generalized to
the overall population. This type of
generic clearance for qualitative
information will not be used for
quantitative information collections that
are designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance. Such data uses require
more rigorous designs that address: The
target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential
nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 139,587 responses at 5 minutes
(0.0833 hours) per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 11,586 annual burden hours.
Dated: June 27, 2019.
Scott Elmore,
PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–14167 Filed 7–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request an Extension From
OMB of One Current Public Collection
of Information: Pipeline Corporate
Security Review Program
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:

The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently-approved

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM

03JYN1

31896

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Notices

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0056,
abstracted below that we will submit to
OMB for an extension in compliance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). The ICR describes the nature of
the information collection and its
expected burden. The collection allows
TSA to assess the current security
practices in the pipeline industry
through TSA’s Pipeline Corporate
Security Review (PCSR) program. The
PCSR program is part of the larger
domain awareness, prevention, and
protection program supporting TSA’s
and the Department of Homeland
Security’s missions.
DATES: Send your comments by
September 3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed
to [email protected] or delivered to
the TSA PRA Officer, Information
Technology (IT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christina A. Walsh at the above address,
or by telephone (571) 227–2062.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation will be
available at http://www.reginfo.gov
upon its submission to OMB. Therefore,
in preparation for OMB review and
approval of the following information
collection, TSA is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Consistent with the requirements of
Executive Order (E.O.) 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs, and E.O. 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, TSA is also

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:23 Jul 02, 2019

Jkt 247001

requesting comments on the extent to
which this request for information could
be modified to reduce the burden on
respondents.
Information Collection Requirement
OMB Control Number 1652–0056;
Pipeline Corporate Security Review
(PCSR) Program. Under the Aviation
and Transportation Security Act
(ATSA) 1 and delegated authority from
the Secretary of Homeland Security,
TSA has broad responsibility and
authority for ‘‘security in all modes of
transportation . . . including security
responsibilities . . . over modes of
transportation that are exercised by the
Department of Transportation.’’ 2 TSA is
specifically empowered to assess threats
to transportation,3 develop policies,
strategies, and plans for dealing with
threats to transportation,4 oversee the
implementation and adequacy of
security measures at transportation
facilities,5 and carry out other
appropriate duties relating to
transportation security.6 The
Implementing Recommendations of the
9/11 Commission Act (9/11 Act)
included a specific requirement for TSA
to conduct assessments of critical
pipeline facilities.7
Consistent with these authorities and
requirements, TSA developed the PCSR
program to assess the current security
practices in the pipeline industry, with
a focus on the physical and cyber
security of pipelines and the crude oil
and petroleum products, such as
gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, home heating
oil, and natural gas, moving through the
system infrastructure. PCSRs are
voluntary, face-to-face visits, usually at
the headquarters facility of the pipeline
owner/operator. Typically, TSA sends
one to three employees to conduct a
seven to eight hour interview with
representatives from the owner/
operator. The TSA representatives
1 Public Law 107–71 (115 Stat. 597; Nov. 19,
2001), codified at 49 U.S.C. 114.
2 See 49 U.S.C. 114(d). The TSA Administrator’s
current authorities under ATSA have been
delegated to him by the Secretary of Homeland
Security. Section 403(2) of the Homeland Security
Act (HSA) of 2002, Public Law 107–296 (116 Stat.
2135, Nov. 25, 2002), transferred all functions of
TSA, including those of the Secretary of
Transportation and the Under Secretary of
Transportation of Security related to TSA, to the
Secretary of Homeland Security. Pursuant to DHS
Delegation Number 7060.2, the Secretary delegated
to the Administrator of TSA, subject to the
Secretary’s guidance and control, the authority
vested in the Secretary with respect to TSA,
including that in section 403(2) of the HSA.
3 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(2).
4 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(3).
5 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(11).
6 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(15).
7 Public Law 110–53 (121 Stat. 266; August 3,
2007), sec. 1557.

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

analyze the owner/operator’s security
plan and policies and compare their
practices with recommendations in
TSA’s Pipeline Security Guidelines.
During the PCSR assessment, the
PCSR program subject matter experts:
• Meet with senior corporate officers
and security managers.
• Develop knowledge of security
planning at critical pipeline
infrastructure sites.
• Establish and maintain a working
relationship with key security staff who
operate critical pipeline infrastructure.
• Identify industry smart practices
and lessons learned.
• Maintain a dynamic modal network
through effective communications with
the pipeline industry and government
stakeholders.
Through this engagement, TSA is also
able to establish and maintain
productive working relationships with
key pipeline security personnel. This
engagement and access to pipeline
facilities also enables TSA to identify
and share smart security practices
observed at one facility to help enhance
and improve the security of the pipeline
industry. As a result, participation in
the voluntary PCSR program enhances
pipeline security at both specific
facilities and across the industry.
TSA has developed a Question Set to
aid in the conducting of PCSRs. The
PCSR Question Set structures the TSAowner/operator discussion and is the
central data source for the security
information TSA collects. TSA
developed the PCSR Question Set based
on input from government and industry
stakeholders on how best to obtain
relevant information from a pipeline
owner/operator about its security plan
and processes. The questions are
designed to examine the company’s
current state of security, as well as to
address measures that are applied if
there is a change in the National
Terrorism Advisory System. The PCSR
Question Set also includes sections for
facility site visits and owner/operator
contact information. By asking
questions related to specific topics (such
as security program management,
vulnerability assessments, components
of the security plan, security training,
and emergency communications), TSA
is able to assess the strength of owner/
operator’s physical security, cyber
security, emergency communication
capabilities, and security training.
This PCSR information collection
provides TSA with real-time
information on a company’s security
posture. The relationships these face-toface contacts foster are critical to the
Federal government’s ability to reach
out to the pipeline stakeholders affected

E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM

03JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Notices
by the PCSRs. In addition, TSA follows
up via email with owner/operators on
specific recommendations made by TSA
during the PCSR.
When combined with information
from other companies across the sector,
TSA can identify and develop
recommended smart practices and
security recommendations for the
pipeline mode. This information allows
TSA to adapt programs to the changing
security threat, while incorporating an
understanding of the improvements
owners/operators make in their security
measures. Without this information, the
ability of TSA to perform its security
mission would be severely hindered.
Portions of PCSR responses that are
deemed Sensitive Security Information
(SSI) are protected in accordance with
procedures meeting the transmission,
handling, and storage requirements of
SSI set forth in 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 15 and 1520.
The annual hour burden for this
information collection is estimated to be
between 180 and 220 hours based upon
20 PCSR visits per year, each lasting a
total of eight hours and the follow-up
regarding security recommendations,
lasting approximately one to three
hours.
Christina A. Walsh,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer,
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2019–14253 Filed 7–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7011–N–25]

30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: FHA Insured Title I Property
Improvement and Manufactured Home
Loan Programs
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

HUD has submitted the
proposed information collection
requirement described below to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review, in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for an
additional 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: August 2,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:

jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:23 Jul 02, 2019

Jkt 247001

HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. Email:
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email
Colette Pollard at Colette.Pollard@
hud.gov or telephone 202–402–3400.
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
This is not a toll-free number. Copies of
available documents submitted to OMB
may be obtained from Ms. Pollard.
This
notice informs the public that HUD has
submitted to OMB a request for
approval of the information collection
described in Section A. The Federal
Register notice that solicited public
comment on the information collection
for a period of 60 days was published
on April 19, 2019 at 84 FR 14128.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: FHA
Insured Title I Property Improvement
and Manufactured Home Loan
Programs.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0328.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Form Number: HUD–637, HUD 646,
HUD 27030, HUD 55013 HUD 55014
HUD 56001, HUD 56001–MH, HUD
5002–MH and SF 3881.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: Title I
loans are made by private sector lenders
and insured by HUD against loss from
defaults. HUD uses this information to
evaluate individual loans on their
overall program performance. The
information collected is used to
determine insurance eligibility and
claim eligibility.
Respondents: Lender approved to
make insured Title I Loans; Dealer/
Contractors; Manufacturers of
manufactured homes; Applicants for
property improvement loans;
Applicants for Manufactured home
loans.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
13,593.
Estimated Number of Responses:
73,440.
Frequency of Response: On occasion,
periodic.
Average Hours per Response: 17.3.
Total Estimated Burdens: 46,099.

PO 00000

Frm 00066

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

31897

B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
Dated: June 13, 2019.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–14244 Filed 7–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2019–0043;
FXES11130800000 190]

Endangered and Threatened Species;
Proposed Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Desert
Tortoise, Nye County, NV
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of application; request
for comments.
AGENCY:

We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, have received an
application from Canyon Mesa Solar,
LLC for an incidental take permit under
the Endangered Species Act. The
requested permit would authorize take
of the Mojave desert tortoise resulting
from the construction, operation, and
maintenance of a solar photovoltaic
facility in Pahrump, Nevada. The permit
application includes a proposed loweffect habitat conservation plan (HCP).
In accordance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), we have prepared a draft low-

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM

03JYN1