Secure Telephone Identity
Governance Authority Token Revocation Review Process
No
material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved
collection
No
Regular
08/31/2021
Requested
Previously Approved
08/31/2024
08/31/2024
50
50
1,200
1,200
0
0
On August 5, 2021, the Commission
adopted Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Appeals of the
STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions, Third
Report and Order, FCC 21-93 (rel. Aug. 6, 2021). The Commission
adopted new rules creating a process for voice service providers to
appeal token revocation decisions made by the private STIR/SHAKEN
Governance Authority that have the effect of placing the voice
service provider out of compliance with our rules. To ensure
Commission oversight of the Governance Authority and ensure voice
service providers aggrieved by an adverse token revocation decision
due process the Commission established that parties seeking review
must file their requests for review in the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS) Docket No. 21-291, Appeals of the
STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions. This
rule change will allow public notice and opportunity to comment by
third parties. These rule changes deviate slightly and
non-substantively from the rules the Office of Management and
Budget pre-approved on June 3, 2021. Change – Parties seeking
commission review of a Governance Authority token revocation
decision must file their requests for review in the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) Docket No. 21-291, Appeals
of the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions:
To implement the Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal
Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act’s provisions related to
caller ID authentication, the Commission adopted a Report and Order
and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on March 30, 2020, which
required voice service providers to implement the STIR/SHAKEN
caller ID authentication technology in the Internet Protocol
portions of their phone networks by June 30, 2021. This Second
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes a limited role for
the Commission to oversee certificate revocation decisions by the
private STIR/SHAKEN governance system that would have the effect of
placing providers in noncompliance with Commission rules.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.