Secure Telephone Identity Governance Authority Token Revocation Review Process

ICR 202108-3060-017

OMB: 3060-1287

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2021-08-31
Supplementary Document
2021-03-31
Supplementary Document
2021-02-17
Supplementary Document
2021-02-17
Supporting Statement A
2021-02-17
Supplementary Document
2021-02-16
Supplementary Document
2021-02-16
Supplementary Document
2021-02-16
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
245794
Modified
ICR Details
3060-1287 202108-3060-017
Received in OIRA 202108-3060-016
FCC WCB
Secure Telephone Identity Governance Authority Token Revocation Review Process
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular 08/31/2021
  Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2024 08/31/2024
50 50
1,200 1,200
0 0

On August 5, 2021, the Commission adopted Call Authentication Trust Anchor; Appeals of the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions, Third Report and Order, FCC 21-93 (rel. Aug. 6, 2021). The Commission adopted new rules creating a process for voice service providers to appeal token revocation decisions made by the private STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority that have the effect of placing the voice service provider out of compliance with our rules. To ensure Commission oversight of the Governance Authority and ensure voice service providers aggrieved by an adverse token revocation decision due process the Commission established that parties seeking review must file their requests for review in the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) Docket No. 21-291, Appeals of the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions. This rule change will allow public notice and opportunity to comment by third parties. These rule changes deviate slightly and non-substantively from the rules the Office of Management and Budget pre-approved on June 3, 2021. Change – Parties seeking commission review of a Governance Authority token revocation decision must file their requests for review in the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) Docket No. 21-291, Appeals of the STIR/SHAKEN Governance Authority Token Revocation Decisions: To implement the Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act’s provisions related to caller ID authentication, the Commission adopted a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on March 30, 2020, which required voice service providers to implement the STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication technology in the Internet Protocol portions of their phone networks by June 30, 2021. This Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes a limited role for the Commission to oversee certificate revocation decisions by the private STIR/SHAKEN governance system that would have the effect of placing providers in noncompliance with Commission rules.

US Code: 47 USC 227b, 227(e), 251(e) Name of Law: Communications Act of 1934, as amended
  
None

3060-AL00 Final or interim final rulemaking 86 FR 48511 08/31/2021

  86 FR 9894 02/17/2021
86 FR 9894 02/17/2021
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Business or other for-profit

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 50 50 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,200 1,200 0 0 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
No
No

$8,502
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
No
Connor Ferraro 202 418-1322 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
08/31/2021


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy