| Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N) (Renewal) | |||||||||||
| 122.66 | 149.84 | 60.88 | |||||||||
| Burden item | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) | (H) | |||
| Technical Person-hours per occurrence | No. of occurrences per respondent per year | Technical Person-hours per respondent per year (C=AxB) |
Respondents per year a | Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD) |
Management person-hours per year (F=Ex0.05) |
Clerical person-hours per year (G=Ex0.1) |
Total Cost per year ($) b | ||||
| 1. Applications | N/A | ||||||||||
| 2. Survey and Studies | N/A | ||||||||||
| 3. Reporting requirements | |||||||||||
| A. Familiarize with regulatory requirements c | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0.8 | 1.6 | $2,179.84 | |||
| B. Required Activities | N/A | ||||||||||
| Initial performance emission tests d | 80 | 1 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Repeat of performance emission tests d | 80 | 0.2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| C. Create information | See 3B | ||||||||||
| D. Gather existing information | See 3B | ||||||||||
| E. Write report | |||||||||||
| Application of construction or modification | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Notification of anticipated startup | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Notification of actual startup | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Source status report | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Notification of initial performance emission test | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 | |||
| Report of initial performance emission test | See 3B | ||||||||||
| Report results of continuous monitoring system (CMS) evaluation | See 3B | ||||||||||
| Report of arsenic emission estimates e | 16 | 2 | 32 | 15 | 480 | 24 | 48 | $65,395.20 | |||
| Report of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates f | 8 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 240 | 12 | 24 | $32,697.60 | |||
| Request approval of control device bypass g | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | $817.44 | |||
| Semiannual excess emissions (opacity) h | 16 | 2 | 32 | 1 | 32 | 1.6 | 3.2 | $4,359.68 | |||
| Subtotal for Reporting Requirements | 890 | $105,450 | |||||||||
| 4. Recordkeeping Requirements | |||||||||||
| A. Familiarize with regulatory requirements | See 3A | ||||||||||
| B. Plan activities | See 3B | ||||||||||
| C. Implement activities | See 3B | ||||||||||
| D. Develop record system | N/A | ||||||||||
| E. Time to enter information i | 40 | 1 | 40 | 16 | 640 | 32 | 64 | $87,193.60 | |||
| Record continuous opacity and temperature of gas entering control device | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Records of emission test results | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Records of CMS performance evaluations | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Occurrence and duration of startup, shutdown, and malfunction of furnace | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Records of malfunction of control device | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Periods when monitors are inoperative | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Maintain and repair of control device, CMS, or monitors | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Records of approved control device bypass | See 4E | ||||||||||
| Semiannual records of uncontrolled arsenic emission rate j | 40 | 2 | 80 | 16 | 1,280 | 64 | 128 | $174,387.20 | |||
| F. Time to train personnel | N/A | ||||||||||
| G. Time for audits | N/A | ||||||||||
| Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements | 2,208 | $261,581 | responses | hr/response | |||||||
| TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) k | 3,100 | $367,000 | 63 | 49.2063492063492 | |||||||
| TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded) k | $56,000 | ||||||||||
| GRAND TOTAL (rounded) k | $423,000 | ||||||||||
| Assumptions: | |||||||||||
| a We have assumed that there are 16 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. | |||||||||||
| b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $149.84 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $122.66 per hour for Technical labor, and $60.88 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2020, “Table 2: Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. | |||||||||||
| c We have assumed that all respondents will have to familiarize with the regulatory requirements each year. | |||||||||||
| d We have assumed that it will take eighty hours to complete performance tests and 20% of sources will have to repeat performance tests. | |||||||||||
| e We have assumed that fifteen respondents will write a report of arsenic emission estimates on a semiannual basis. | |||||||||||
| f We have assumed that fifteen respondents will write a report of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates on a semiannual basis. | |||||||||||
| g We have assumed that one respondent will write a report requesting approval of control device bypass once a year. | |||||||||||
| h We have assumed that one respondent will write an excess emissions report semiannually. | |||||||||||
| i It will take each respondent forty hours to enter information. | |||||||||||
| j It will take each respondent forty hours twice a year to record uncontrolled arsenic emission rate. | |||||||||||
| k Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. | |||||||||||
| Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Inorganic Arsenic Emissions from Glass Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR Part 61, Subpart N) (Renewal) | ||||||||
| 51.23 | 69.04 | 27.73 | ||||||
| Burden Item | (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | (G) | (H) |
| Technical Person-hours per occurrence | No. of occurrences per year | Technical Person-hours per Plant per year (C=AxB) |
Respondents per year a | Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD) |
Management person-hours per year (F=Ex0.05) |
Clerical person-hours per year (G=Ex0.1) |
Total Cost per year b | |
| Activities | ||||||||
| New facility | ||||||||
| Initial performance test c | 24 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Repeat performance test d | 24 | 0.2 | 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Review reports | ||||||||
| New facility | ||||||||
| Construction or modification application | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Notification of anticipated startup | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Notification of actual startup | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Source status report | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Notification of initial performance emissions test | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Report of initial performance emissions test results | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Notification of physical or operational change | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Notification of emissions test | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Report results of CMS evaluation | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $0 |
| Existing facility | ||||||||
| Report of arsenic emission estimates rates e | 4 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 60 | 3 | 6 | $3,447.30 |
| Reports of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates f | 8 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 120 | 6 | 12 | $6,894.60 |
| Semiannual excess emissions g | 6 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 0.6 | 1.2 | $689.46 |
| Request approval of control device bypass h | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | $344.73 |
| TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded) i | 228 | $11,400 | ||||||
| Assumptions: | ||||||||
| a We have assumed that there are 16 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years. | ||||||||
| b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $69.04 (GS-13, Step 5, $43.15 + 60%) for managerial, $51.23 (GS-12, Step 1, $32.02 + 60%) for Technical, and $27.73 (GS-6, Step 3, $17.33 + 60%) for Clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2021 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. | ||||||||
| c We have assumed that it will take twenty four hours to perform initial performance test. | ||||||||
| d We have assumed that 20% of sources will take twenty four hours to repeat performance test. | ||||||||
| e We have assumed that reports submitted by the fifteen respondents will be reviewed once a year. These reports are submitted semiannually. | ||||||||
| f We have assumed that it will take eight hours to review reports of uncontrolled arsenic emission rates once a year. These reports are submitted semiannually. | ||||||||
| g It is required that excess emissions reports are reviewed on a semiannual basis. | ||||||||
| h We have assumed that the report requesting approval of control device bypass will be reviewed once a year. | ||||||||
| i Totals have been rounded to 3 significant values. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding. | ||||||||
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 0000-00-00 |