Supporting Statement Part A SS (4)

Tracking and OMB Number: (XX) 1840-0840

Revised: XX/XX/XXXX

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. What is the purpose for this information collection? Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Include a citation that authorizes the collection of information. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, list the sections with a brief description of the information collection requirement, and/or changes to sections, if applicable.

The purpose of Section 102(b)(6) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (Fulbright-Hays Act) is to promote and develop modern foreign language training and area studies throughout the educational structure of the United States. To help accomplish this objective, fellowships are awarded through US institutions of higher education to American doctoral dissertation fellows enabling them to conduct overseas research and enhance their foreign language proficiency.

Under the Fulbright-Hays Doctoral Dissertation Research Abroad (DDRA) program, individual scholars apply through eligible institutions for an institutional grant to support the research fellowship. These institutions administer the program in cooperation with the US Department of Education (US/ED) as provided under the authority of Sections 102(b)(6) and 104(e)(1) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, 34 CFR Parts 662, the Policy Statements of the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board (FSB), and the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR).

One of the performance measures for the DDRA program is the “percentage of DDRA fellows who found employment that utilized their language and area studies skills within 8 years of receiving their award.” The efficiency measure for the DDRA program is “Cost per DDRA fellow who found employment that utilized their language and area studies skills within 8 years.” This information collection is the tool that can gather the information necessary to address the performance and efficiency measures.

The purpose of this survey is to collect data demonstrating how DDRA alumni are utilizing their language training in their careers in the time since they participated in the DDRA program. The survey will measure the language proficiency of participants who have completed the DDRA program. The survey will also measure how former fellows are utilizing their language training in their education and/or career trajectory. This data will allow us to ascertain both the short and long-term benefits of receiving a fellowship under the DDRA program. This information will also be used to demonstrate to the US Department of Education leadership and Congress the value of the DDRA program to the American educational system.

Since this collection was discontinued, the number of responses and burden hours increases from zero to 157 responses and 40 burden hours. The previously approved collection was cleared with 90 responses and 23 burden hours. However, in this reinstatement we are changing the number of responses and burden hours. Program wishes to increase the number of responses to 157, based on an increase in the number of fellows completing the survey. The new number of burden hours requested is the calculation of individual response time which is 0.25, or approximately 15 minutes, multiplied by the number of responses. For this reinstatement, this results in annual burden hours of 40.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The survey is designed to be sent to DDRA grantee institutions, who administer the survey to their former DDRA fellows and report the results to the Department. The purpose of the survey is to collect information about DDRA fellows’ postgraduate employment, and the degree to which the DDRA fellowships contribute to the fellows’ postgraduate employment. Program staff will collect and analyze the fellow responses, and publish findings in a report, which will be posted on the program’s web site.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Please identify systems or websites used to electronically collect this information. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden. If there is an increase or decrease in burden related to using technology (e.g. using an electronic form, system or website from paper), please explain in number 12.

This information collection will be 100% electronic. The survey is built into an online database owned by a contractor, with whom the Department will negotiate a contract. Program staff will use the database to send the survey to DDRA grantee institutions, who will send their fellows a link to the survey. Fellows will access the database to complete their surveys and submit them into the online system. Program staff will access the fellows’ completed surveys via the online database.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

There is no duplication of the information collected via this survey. No similar information is available.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.

This collection does not impact small businesses or other small entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If this survey is not conducted as described, the Department would not be able to collect data to respond to its performance and efficiency measures.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

• requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

• requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

• requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

• requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

• in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

• requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

• that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

• requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

There are no special circumstances that would require the information collection to be conducted in any of the ways described.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.

Include a citation for the 60 day comment period (e.g. Vol. 84 FR ##### and the date of publication). Summarize public comments received in response to the 60 day notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. If only non-substantive comments are provided, please provide a statement to that effect and that it did not relate or warrant any changes to this information collection request. In your comments, please also indicate the number of public comments received.

For the 30 day notice, indicate that a notice will be published.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

The Department has consulted with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the survey, including representatives of those from whom the information is to be obtained, and from the Department’s contractor, Avar Consulting, Inc., who analyzed the kinds of data collected and proposed recommendations for a new survey instrument.

The Department will publish both a 60-day and a 30-day notice in the Federal Register, and will review and respond to the comments received. Changes will be made when appropriate.

The Department published a 60-day notice in the Federal Register (Vol.86 No.242 page 72216) on December 22, 2021. The comment period ended February 22, 2022. There was one non-substantive public comment as a result of the notice.

8. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

No payments or gifts are provided to respondents.

8. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.¹ If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data. If no PII will be collected, state that no assurance of confidentiality is provided to respondents. If the Paperwork Burden Statement is not included physically on a form, you may include it here. Please ensure that your response per respondent matches the estimate provided in number 12.

The Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data. No PII is collected.

8. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

No questions of a sensitive nature are asked of respondents.

8. Provide estimates of the hour burden for this current information collection request. The statement should:

• Provide an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. Address changes in burden due to the use of technology (if applicable). Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

• Please do not include increases in burden and respondents numerically in this table. Explain these changes in number 15.

• Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable.

• If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burden in the table below.

• Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. Use this site to research the appropriate wage rate. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14. If there is no cost to respondents, indicate by entering 0 in the chart below and/or provide a statement.

Provide a descriptive narrative here in addition to completing the table below with burden hour estimates.

Since this collection is new, the burden increases as a result of a program change due to agency discretion. The OMB approved number of respondents and responses for this collection, because it was discontinued, was zero. The OMB approved burden hours for this collection was zero. Nine people completed the draft survey, and the Department concluded that the average time it takes to complete the survey is approximately 15 minutes. The Department calculated that the expected number of respondents and responses is 157. Based on these calculations, the annual burden hours would be 40.

Estimated Annual Burden and Respondent Costs Table

Information Activity or IC (with type of respondent)	Sample Size (if applicable)	Respondent Response Rate (if applicable)	Number of Respondents	Number of Responses	Average Burden Hours per Response	Total Annual Burden Hours	Estimated Respondent Average Hourly Wage	Total Annual Costs (hourly wage x total burden hours)
			157	1	0.26	40	0.00	0.00
Annualized Totals			157	1	0.26	40	0.00	0.00

Please ensure the annual total burden, respondents and response match those entered in IC Data Parts 1 and 2, and the response per respondent matches the Paperwork Burden Statement that must be included on all forms.

8. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

• The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

• If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

• Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12.

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost 0.00

Total Annual Costs (O&M) 0.00____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested 0.00

8. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

Expense	Frequency of Expense	Number of Staff	Staff Hours	Wage/hour	Annual Cost
Clearance of Information Collection	Once every 3 years	1	80	$62.62	$5,009.60
Preparation of Qualtrics contracting package	Annual	1	40	$62.62	$2,504.80
Cost of Qualtrics License	Annual				$7,000.00
Building survey in Qualtrics	Bi-annual	1	20	$62.62	$1,252.40
Distribution of survey to grantee institutions	Bi-annual	1	20	$62.62	$1,252.40
Technical Assistance to grantee institutions	Bi-annual	1	60	$62.62	$3,757.20
Collection of survey responses	Bi-annual	1	40	$62.62	$2,504.80
Analyzing survey responses	Bi-annual	1	100	$62.62	$6,262.00
Drafting Survey report	Bi-annual	1	120	$62.62	$7,514.40
Total					$37,057.60

8. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

Provide a descriptive narrative for the reasons of any change in addition to completing the table with the burden hour change(s) here.

Since this collection was discontinued, the number of responses and burden hours increases from zero to 157 responses and 40 burden hours. The previously approved collection was cleared with 90 responses and 23 burden hours. However, in this reinstatement we are changing the number of responses and burden hours. Program wishes to increase the number of responses to 157, based on an increase in the number of fellows completing the survey. The new number of burden hours requested is the calculation of individual response time which is 0.25, or approximately 15 minutes, multiplied by the number of responses. For this reinstatement, this results in annual burden hours of 40.

	Program Change Due to New Statute	Program Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate
Total Burden		40
Total Responses		157
Total Costs (if applicable)

8. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

The estimated time schedule is as follows: distribute the survey in March with a response deadline in the beginning of May. The data analysis, including cross-tabulations and a one-tailed t-test, would be completed by the end of June, corresponding tables would be completed by the end of August, and the report would be drafted by the end of October. The report must be cleared by the IFLE Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary and OCO before publication and web posting. In an ideal year, that would be completed by the end of December.

8. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

The expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection will be displayed as required.

8. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.

No exceptions to the certification statement are sought.

1 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)

8