1545-1500 Supporting Statement

1545-1500 Supporting Statement.docx

Form 8850, Pre-Screening Notice and Certification Request for the Work Opportunity Credit

OMB: 1545-1500

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Internal Revenue Service

Form 8850, Pre-Screening Notice and Certification Request for the Work Opportunity Credit


OMB No. 1545-1500


  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 51(d)(13) requires an employer to receive a certification from a designated local agency (DLA) that an employee is a member of a targeted group for purposes of claiming the Work Opportunity Tax Credit. The employer must complete and submit a pre-screening notice to the DLA as part of a written request for the certification.


Form 8850 is the pre-screening notice that must be submitted by the employer to the DLA of the state in which the employee works to request certification that the employee is a member of a targeted group.


  1. USE OF DATA


Form 8850 contains the information provided to the employer by the applicant that forms the basis of the employer’s belief that the applicant is a member of a targeted group. The information is used by the DLA to determine if the job applicant is a member of a targeted group.


  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


Electronic filing of Form 8850 is currently available.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


The information obtained through this collection is unique and is not already available for use or adaptation from another source.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


The collection of information requirement will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


A less frequent collection on federal programs will result in the inability of the IRS to determine if the employer qualifies for a Work Opportunity Tax Credit claimed on their tax return, thereby engendering the inability of IRS to meet its mission.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


There are no special circumstances requiring data collection to be inconsistent with guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice (86 FR 51448), dated September 15, 2021.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


No payment or gift has been provided to any respondents.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


No sensitive personally identifiable information is being collected by the IRS. Information is provided to the DLA by the employer and only provided to the IRS during an inquiry or audit.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 51(d)(13) requires an employer to disclose information and keep records. The IRS anticipates that there will be 440,000 respondents annually, and the estimated time per response time would be 7 hours and 24 minutes per respondent.


Authority

Description

# of Respondents

# Responses per Respondent

Annual Responses

Hours per Response

Total Burden

IRC 51(d)(13)

Form 8850

440,000

1

440,000

7.37

3,242,800

Totals


440,000


440,000


3,242,800


  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


To ensure more accuracy and consistency across its information collections, the IRS is currently in the process of revising the methodology it uses to estimate burden and costs. Once this methodology is complete, the IRS will update this information collection to reflect a more precise estimate of burden and costs.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

The Federal Government cost estimate is based on a model that considers the following three cost factors for each information product: aggregate labor costs for development, including annualized startup expenses, operating and maintenance expenses, and distribution of the product that collects the information. These costs do not include any activities such as taxpayer assistance and enforcement.


The government computes cost using a multi-step process. First, the government creates a weighted factor for the level of effort to create each information collection product based on variables, such as complexity, number of pages, type of product, and frequency of revision. Second, the total costs associated with developing the product such as labor cost, and operating expenses associated with the downstream impact such as support functions, are added together to obtain the aggregated total cost. Then, the aggregated total cost and factor are multiplied together to obtain the aggregated cost per product. Lastly, the aggregated cost per product is added to the cost of shipping and printing each product to IRS offices, National Distribution Center, libraries, and other outlets. The result is the government cost estimate per product.


The government cost estimate for this collection is summarized in the table below.


Product

Aggregate Cost per Product (factor applied)


Printing and Distribution


Government Cost Estimate per Product

Form 8850

$22,829

+

0

=

$22,829

Form 8850 Instructions

$4,390

+

0

=

$4,390

Grand Total

$27,219


0


$27,219

Table costs are based on 2021 actuals obtained from IRS Chief Financial Office and Media and Publications


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


There are no plans for tabulation, statistical analysis and publication.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


The IRS believes that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTION TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorJ11FB
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2022-04-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy