Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 1 of 13

Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2006-2
January 9, 2006
Rev. Proc. 2006-9
Section 482.—Allocation of Income and Deductions Among Taxpayers

Table of Contents


















SECTION 1: PURPOSE
SECTION 2: PRINCIPLES OF THE APA PROGRAM
SECTION 3: PREFILING CONFERENCES
SECTION 4: CONTENT OF APA REQUESTS
SECTION 5: TAXPAYER DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
SECTION 6: PROCESSING OF APA REQUESTS
SECTION 7: COMPETENT AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
SECTION 8: ROLLBACK OF TPM
SECTION 9: SMALL BUSINESS TAXPAYER APAs
SECTION 10: LEGAL EFFECT OF THE APA
SECTION 11: ADMINISTERING THE APA
SECTION 12: RENEWING THE APA
SECTION 13: DISCLOSURE
SECTION 14: EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
SECTION 15: EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 16: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
DRAFTING INFORMATION

SECTION 1: PURPOSE
.01 This revenue procedure explains the manner in which taxpayers may request an advance pricing agreement (“APA”) from the APA Program
within the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the manner in which such a request will be processed by the APA Program, and the
effect and administration of APAs. This revenue procedure updates and supersedes Revenue Procedure 2004-40, 2004-2 C.B. 50.

SECTION 2: PRINCIPLES OF THE APA PROGRAM
.01 The APA Program provides a voluntary process whereby the Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) and taxpayers may resolve transfer pricing
issues under § 482 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), the Income Tax Regulations (“the regulations”) thereunder, and relevant income tax
treaties to which the United States is a party in a principled and cooperative manner on a prospective basis. The APA process increases the
efficiency of tax administration by encouraging taxpayers to come forward and present to the Service all the facts relevant to a proper transfer pricing
analysis and to work towards a mutual agreement in a spirit of openness and cooperation. The prospective nature of APAs lessens the burden of
compliance by giving taxpayers greater certainty regarding their transfer pricing methods, and promotes the principled resolution of these issues by
allowing for their discussion and resolution in advance before the consequences of such resolution are fully known to taxpayers and the Service.
.02 The APA Program’s central goal is the prompt, proper, and fair resolution of APA requests and renewals consistent with the principles of sound
tax administration.
.03 The APA Program reserves the right not to accept an APA request or to terminate consideration of an APA request if the request or the continued
development of the case is contrary to the principles of sound tax administration.
.04 An APA is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Service in which the parties set forth, in advance of controlled transactions, the best
transfer pricing method (“TPM”) within the meaning of § 482 of the Code and the regulations. The agreement specifies the controlled transactions or
transfers (“covered transactions”), TPM, APA term, operational and compliance provisions, appropriate adjustments, critical assumptions regarding
future events, required APA records, and annual reporting responsibilities.
1.

APAs are intended to supplement traditional administrative, judicial, and treaty mechanisms for resolving transfer pricing issues.

2.

Taxpayers formally initiate the process for APAs. Thereafter, APAs require discussions among the taxpayer, one or more associated
enterprises, and one or more tax administrations, including the Service.

3.

Ordinarily, an APA is reached only on the proposed covered transactions. In some cases, however, the APA Program may require that the
scope of the proposed covered transactions be expanded or contracted, or may determine that the TPM proposed by the taxpayer is not
appropriate for some subset of the proposed covered transactions.

.05 The taxpayer’s participation in the APA process is entirely voluntary. In some cases, the Service may approach a taxpayer to discuss the
advantages of an APA.
.06 The APA Program is under the immediate supervision of a Director (the “APA Director”) within the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International). The APA Director reports to the Associate Chief Counsel (International) who exercises general oversight over the APA Program. The
APA Director, directly or by delegation, may take any action - not contrary to statute, regulation, or treaty - necessary to carry out the provisions of
this revenue procedure. The APA Director may modify the provisions contained in this revenue procedure (for example, time limits or content of an
APA request) if that modification would be consistent with sound tax administration.
.07 Under the APA request procedure, the taxpayer proposes a TPM and provides data intended to show that the TPM constitutes the appropriate
application of the best method rule under the § 482 regulations. The Service, through an APA Team, evaluates the APA request by analyzing all
relevant data and information submitted with the initial request and at any time thereafter.
.08 Taxpayers may request a bilateral, multilateral, or, if appropriate, a unilateral APA. A bilateral or multilateral APA involves a request for an APA
between the taxpayer and the Service, accompanied by a request for a mutual agreement between relevant competent authorities. A unilateral APA
involves only an agreement between the taxpayer and the Service. Where possible, in the interest of sound tax administration and to ensure that no
potential for double taxation results from an APA, an APA should be concluded on a bilateral or multilateral basis between the competent authorities

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 2 of 13

through the mutual agreement procedure of the relevant income tax treaty or treaties.
.09 The APA Policy Board establishes policy on matters of substantial genuine importance pertaining to the APA Program. It consists of the
Associate Chief Counsel (International), the APA Director, the Director, International (Large and Mid-Size Business (LMSB) Operating Division),
Treasury’s International Tax Counsel, and other senior officials.
.10 In a bilateral or multilateral case, the APA Program prepares a recommended negotiating position for the U.S. Competent Authority. The
negotiating position serves as a basis for discussions with the relevant foreign competent authority or authorities under the mutual agreement article
of the applicable income tax treaty or treaties. Prior to finalizing its recommendation, the APA Program, through the Team Leader (see section 6.03),
conveys the substance of the APA Team’s position to the taxpayer to provide an opportunity for the taxpayer to comment. The Team Leader, in
coordination with other members of the APA Team, considers the merits of the taxpayer’s timely received comments in finalizing the recommended
position.
.11 If the U.S. Competent Authority and the relevant foreign competent authority or authorities reach a mutual agreement, the taxpayer and the
Service may execute one or more APAs consistent with that mutual agreement.
.12 In appropriate cases, the TPM may be applied to tax years prior to those covered by the APA (“rollback” of the TPM, see section 8). The
Service’s policy is to use rollbacks whenever feasible based on the consistency of the facts, law, and available records for the prior years. This policy
does not apply to unilateral APA requests in which a rollback would decrease taxable income on a return filed for a taxable year not covered by the
APA (see § 1.482-1(a)(3)).
.13 Filing an APA request does not suspend any examination or other enforcement proceedings. The APA Program will coordinate its activities with
those of other Service proceedings to avoid duplicative information requests to the taxpayer, enhance the efficiency of Service operations, and
reduce overall taxpayer compliance burdens.

SECTION 3: PREFILING CONFERENCES
.01 General Principles
A taxpayer may request a prefiling conference (“PFC”) with the APA Program to discuss informally the suitability of an APA.
.02 Discussion Topics
The taxpayer may use a PFC to clarify what information, documentation, and analyses are likely to be necessary for the Service to consider an APA
request. Among the areas of discussion are the covered transactions, the potentially applicable TPMs, the probability of agreement among the
competent authorities, and the APA Program’s schedule and method for coordinating and evaluating the request. To provide for the efficient use of
taxpayer resources, PFCs are recommended in order to ensure that the APA request is appropriate and focuses on relevant issues.
.03 Scheduling
A taxpayer or its representative may contact the APA Program Office in Washington, D.C. or California to schedule a PFC. The taxpayer or its
representative should propose three alternative dates, and should generally allow two weeks before the first proposed date. The telephone and
facsimile numbers are:
Washington, DC
Voice: (202) 435-5220
Facsimile: (202) 435-5238
California
Voice: (949) 360-3486
Facsimile: (949) 360-3446
.04 PFC May be Named or Anonymous
The taxpayer may request a PFC either on an identified or anonymous basis.
.05 Participation
If a taxpayer identifies itself, representatives of the Service Operating Division with responsibility for the taxpayer’s return normally will participate in
the PFC. Representatives from Appeals and the Division Counsel field offices may also attend. In the case of a PFC regarding a bilateral APA
request, a Competent Authority analyst may attend. If a taxpayer initially requests a PFC on an anonymous basis but prior to the meeting chooses to
identify itself, the meeting may be rescheduled to permit necessary Service personnel to attend. When requesting a PFC on an identified basis, the
taxpayer must inform the APA Program whether transactions similar or related to those to be covered by the proposed APA are currently under
consideration by a Service Operating Division, an Appeals Office, a Division Counsel, or an Associate Chief Counsel.
.06 Prefiling Submission
A taxpayer must send a brief prefiling submission to the relevant APA Program Office in Washington, D.C. or California that lists the persons
attending the PFC for the taxpayer (first names only or job titles are sufficient if the PFC will be on an anonymous basis) and that outlines and
describes the issues to be discussed. This brief submission should be provided at least one week in advance of the PFC. If the document is twenty
pages or less, it may be sent by facsimile; but if it exceeds twenty pages, eight copies (or if anonymous, only three copies) and one original should be
delivered.

SECTION 4: CONTENT OF APA REQUESTS
.01 Introduction
A complete APA request is essential to a timely and efficient APA process. In the APA Program’s experience, a complete APA request may save
many months of case processing time and hundreds of hours of labor, as it allows the APA Team to narrow its focus immediately to the core issue or
issues and avoids delays caused by the need to supplement the original APA request. The goal of completing a unilateral APA or a recommended
negotiating position within 12 months (see section 6.01) is predicated in large part on the assumption that the taxpayer has submitted a complete
APA request.
A complete APA request should provide the information specified below and all other information reasonably necessary to permit the APA Program to
evaluate fully the taxpayer’s proposed TPM. The level of detail required will depend on the particular facts and circumstances of each case and
should be governed by relevancy and materiality considerations (keeping in mind that the request should provide enough information to allow the

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 3 of 13

reader to concur that a matter is not relevant or material). The detailed information supporting the APA request should be tailored to the specific facts
relating to the taxpayer, the proposed covered transactions, and relevant legal authority. It should also take into account discussions with the APA
Program in any PFC.
An APA request will normally be considered not “substantially complete” for purposes of sections 4.07, 4.12, 6.01, and 6.03 unless the request
contains the information required below (as may be modified by agreement of the parties).
.02 General Principles
1.

For purposes of requesting an APA, each taxpayer that is a member of a consolidated group (as defined in Treasury Regulations § 1.1502-1)
must comply with the provisions of § 1.1502-77.

2.

All materials submitted with the APA request become part of the APA Program’s case file and will not be returned. Therefore, taxpayers
should not submit original documents.

3.

The taxpayer must submit copies of any documents relating to the proposed TPM. All materials submitted must be properly labeled, indexed,
and referenced in the request. Any previously submitted documents that the taxpayer wishes to associate with the request must be
referenced.

4.

If the records or documents to be submitted are too voluminous for transmittal with the request, the taxpayer must describe the contents of
such items in the request and confirm that the items will promptly be made available upon request.

5.

All documents submitted in a foreign language must be accompanied by an accurate English translation.

6.

All documents in the APA request that are available in electronic format should be submitted, on either a CD-ROM or diskette, along with the
paper submission. Suitable formats include Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Adobe Portable Document Format. Other formats may
be arranged on a case-by-case basis.

.03 Factual, Legal, and Analytical Items for All Proposed APAs
Unless otherwise agreed, each APA request must include an appropriate discussion of the items set forth below.
1.

A comprehensive table of contents.

2.

The names, addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, taxpayer identification numbers (if applicable), and both the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes reported on the most recently filed federal tax
returns (if applicable) of (a) the organizations, trades, and businesses engaging in the proposed covered transactions, and (b) the controlling
taxpayer of the parties, if the controlling taxpayer is not itself engaging in the proposed covered transactions.

3.

The controlling taxpayer’s industry (for example, Heavy Manufacturing and Transportation) within LMSB; or if the taxpayer files its tax returns
with the Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Operating Division, a statement to that effect.

4.

A properly completed Form 2848 (Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative) for any person authorized to represent the taxpayer
in connection with the request, disregarding if appropriate the line 3 instruction limiting the authorization to three future tax periods. If the
taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative retains any other person (for example, a law firm, accounting firm, or economic
consulting firm) to assist the taxpayer in pursuing the APA request, the taxpayer must also provide a separate written authorization for
disclosures to the person and such person’s employees during the APA Program’s consideration of the request, according to the instructions
in § 301.6103(c)-1T (see also T.D. 9011, 2002-2 C.B. 356, 31 C.F.R. Part 10 (July 26, 2002)). Such written authorization may be made by
completing Form 8821 (Tax Information Authorization), disregarding, if appropriate, the line 3 instruction limiting the authorization to three
future tax periods.

5.

A description of the general history of business operations, worldwide organizational structure, ownership, capitalization, financial
arrangements, principal businesses, the place or places where such businesses are conducted, and major transaction flows of the parties to
the proposed covered transactions. The description must also identify any branches or entities disregarded for tax purposes (see § 301.77013) that are involved in the proposed covered transactions.

6.

A description and analysis of the transactions covered by the APA request, as well as the estimated dollar value of each proposed covered
transaction for each year of the proposed term of the APA. The discussion must also describe how the proposed covered transactions relate
to other controlled transactions that the taxpayer does not propose to cover.

7.

A statement addressing the extent to which the tested party has transactions involving commission sales and ordinary distribution sales (i.e.,
buying and reselling). If the APA request involves both kinds of transactions, the taxpayer must propose a TPM and analyze the extent to
which it is appropriate under the facts and circumstances to (a) test both kinds of transactions on an aggregated basis; (b) test the two kinds
of transactions separately; or (c) exclude one of the two kinds of transactions from the APA.

8.

For each party to the proposed covered transactions, a detailed analysis of:

9.

10

a.

the functions and economic activities performed;

b.

the assets employed;

c.

the economic costs incurred;

d.

the risks assumed;

e.

relevant contractual terms;

f.

relevant economic conditions; and

g.

relevant non-recognition transactions.

Copies of the principal written agreement(s), if any, setting forth the contractual terms for the covered transactions (within the meaning of
§ 1.482-1(d)(3)(ii), including without limitation the form of consideration charged or paid); and an explanation of any significant discrepancy
between the applicable written agreement(s) and the economic substance of the covered transactions (including payment form) to date and
as proposed for the APA.
Representative financial and tax data of the parties to the proposed covered transactions for the last three taxable years (or more years if

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 4 of 13

relevant to the proposed TPM), together with other pertinent data and documents in support of the TPM. This item may include (but need not
be limited to) data from the following:
a.

Form 5471 (Information Return of U.S. Persons With Respect To Certain Foreign Corporations);

b.

Form 5472 (Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or
Business);

c.

income tax returns;

d.

financial statements;

e.

annual reports to stockholders;

f.

other pertinent U.S. and foreign government filings (for example, customs reports or SEC filings);

g.

existing pricing, distribution, or licensing agreements;

h.

marketing and financial studies;

i.

documentation prepared in consideration of § 6662(e); and

j.

company-wide accounting procedures, budgets, projections, business plans, and worldwide product line or business segment
profitability reports.

11.

The functional currency of the parties to the proposed covered transactions and their respective foreign currency exchange risks.

12.

The taxable year of each party to the proposed covered transactions.

13.

A description of significant financial accounting methods employed by the parties that have a bearing on any proposed TPM.

14.

An explanation of any relevant financial and tax accounting differences between the U.S. and the foreign countries.

15.

A discussion of any relevant statutory provisions, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, revenue rulings, or revenue procedures that relate
to the appropriateness of the proposed TPM for the requested APA. For cases in which the taxpayer requests a rollback, the discussion
should state whether the period of limitations for the rollback years has expired in the U.S. or in foreign countries, and if not, when the
periods of limitations do expire.

16.

(a) A statement describing all previous and current issues at the examination, Appeals, judicial, or competent authority levels that relate to
the proposed TPM, including an explanation of the taxpayer’s and the government’s positions and any resolution of the issues.
(b) If the taxpayer is requesting a rollback that involves any issues relevant to the proposed covered transactions that are unresolved and still
under consideration by Appeals, the taxpayer must include with its APA request a waiver of its right to be present during communications
between the Appeals Office and the APA Team members (as described in section 6.04). See Rev. Proc. 2000-43, 2000-2 C.B. 404. The
following language satisfies this requirement:
Waiver of Ex Parte Communication: [Name of taxpayer(s)] agrees to the participation of the Appeals Office in the
consideration of this APA request, and hereby waives its right to be present during, or participate in, communications related
to the APA request or the proposed covered transactions between the Appeals Office and the APA Team members.

17.

A statement describing any APAs with, or rulings by, foreign tax authorities relating to the proposed covered transactions (or any pending
requests for such APAs or rulings) and, if requested, copies of such APAs or rulings.

18.

An economic analysis or study of the general industry pricing practices and economic functions performed within the markets and
geographical areas covered by the APA request.

19.

A list of the taxpayer’s competitors and a discussion of any uncontrolled transactions, lines of business or types of businesses comparable or
similar to those addressed in the request.

20.

An explanation of the proposed TPMs, including any method used to convert results from one payment form to another (e.g., to convert from
a lump sum to a contingent payment such as a sales-based royalty), and an analysis of why each proposed TPM is the best method within
the meaning of § 1.482-1(c).

21.

A detailed presentation of the research efforts and criteria used to identify and select possible independent comparables. This presentation
should include a list of potential comparables and an explanation of why each was either accepted or rejected. The taxpayer may request an
APA even though no comparable uncontrolled prices, transactions, or companies can be identified. In such cases, a taxpayer must
demonstrate that the proposed TPM otherwise satisfies the requirements of § 482 and this revenue procedure.

22.

Detailed financial data (and licenses or other agreements, if applicable) on the selected independent comparables in print and electronic
formats. For example, if the proposed TPM uses the comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method, the comparable pricing information
should be included; if the TPM uses the comparable uncontrolled transaction (CUT) method, the comparable license agreements should be
included; and if the TPM uses the comparable profits method (CPM), the annual and multiple year period results using the selected profit
level indicator should be included. If pertinent, the taxpayer should demonstrate consideration of alternative measurements of profitability and
return on investment (for example, gross profit margin or markup, ratio of gross income to total operating expenses, net operating profit
margin, or return on assets).

23.

A detailed explanation of any adjustments to the selected comparables, such as: accounting for product line segregations; differences in
accounting practices; differences relating to functions, assets employed, risks assumed, and costs incurred; volume or scale differences; and
differing economic and market conditions.

24.

An illustration of the application of each proposed TPM by applying the TPM, in a consistent format, to the prior three taxable years’ financial
and tax data of the parties to the covered transactions. If historical data cannot be used to illustrate a TPM (for example, when the TPM
applies to a new product or business), the request should include an illustration based on projected or hypothetical data, as well as a
description of the source of the data. If coverage of three taxable years is inappropriate for any reason, the taxpayer should provide data for
an appropriate period and explain why the period was chosen.

04 Specific Items for a Cost Sharing Arrangement

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 5 of 13

In addition to the items in section 4.03, an APA request related to a cost sharing arrangement (“CSA”) must include:
1.

A copy of (a) the documents forming or revising the CSA, (b) the documents relevant to the making available of any pre-existing intangible
property to the CSA), including the documents relevant to the acquisition or licensing of any pre-existing intangible property that is made
available to the CSA, for purposes of research in the intangible development area, and (c) a statement that the CSA conforms to the
requirements of § 1.482-7(b).

2.

A specific description of intangible development costs for all participants under the CSA. Such description should include a description of the
costs included and excluded (for example, costs of technology acquired from third parties; the treatment of stock-based compensation under
the CSA; non-product specific development costs; costs associated with abandoned projects; costs associated with specific stages of
product development; relevant labor, material, and overhead costs; and support and administrative costs); a description of any services
performed for participants that will be included in intangible development costs (for example, contract research) and how those services
would be taken into account; and, for a representative period, a breakdown of total costs incurred, and the costs borne by each participant,
according to the CSA.

3.

The basis (as described in § 1.482-7(f)(3)(ii)) used to measure anticipated benefits, the projections used to estimate benefits, and why such
basis and projections yield the most reliable estimate of reasonably anticipated benefits.

4.

The method used to calculate each participant’s share of intangible development costs; the reason why that method can reasonably be
expected to reflect that participant’s share of anticipated benefits; and a statement of the circumstances under which the participants’ shares
of intangible development costs will be adjusted to account for changes in economic conditions, business operations and practices, and the
ongoing development of intangibles under the CSA.

5.

The accounting method used to determine the costs and benefits of the intangible development (including the method used to translate
foreign currencies).

6.

Each participant’s sales, cost of sales, operating expenses, research and development costs, and operating profit (historical for the five most
recently completed taxable years and projected for two taxable years) for the product area covered by the CSA.

7.

A description of any amounts to be received from non-participants for the use of covered intangibles (for example, as a royalty pursuant to a
license agreement) and how the participants would take into account such amounts.

8.

Representative internal manuals, directives, guidelines, and similar documents prepared for purposes of implementing or operating the CSA
(for example, research and development committee meeting minutes, market studies, economic impact analyses, capital expenditure
budgets, engineering studies, reports and studies of trends and profitability in the industry, and financial analyses for financing and cash flow
purposes).

9.

A description of any prior research undertaken in the intangible development area; the identification of any pre-existing intangible property
made available to the CSA; the amount of any buy-in or buy-out payment (as defined in § 1.482-7(g)(2)); a complete economic analysis to
support the payment; the form of the payment, the method used to determine the amount of the payment (that is, the method used to value
the pre-existing intangible property and to calculate any royalty, lump sum, or installment payments, including, if applicable, any conversion
between different payment forms); and an explanation of any discrepancy between the proposed payment form and the payment form
established in the documents listed in paragraph (1) above (see section 4.03(9)); and an analysis demonstrating that the method used
constitutes the best method under § 1.482-1(c).

10.

The treatment of cost sharing and buy-in or buy-out payments for U.S. income tax purposes (for example, the source and character of those
payments).

11.

Evidence of the participants’ compliance with the reporting requirements under § 1.482-7(j) of the cost sharing regulations.

12.

For taxpayers requesting an APA that covers a CSA but does not cover the related buy-in transaction, or an APA that covers a buy-in
transaction but does not cover the related CSA, the reasons why an APA limited in this manner is consistent with the principles of the APA
process, as set forth in this revenue procedure. The APA Program will evaluate the requests to ensure their consistency with the principles of
this revenue procedure and sound tax administration. If an APA request is limited to covering only buy-in payments, the APA must include a
representation by the taxpayer, as a term and condition of the APA, that the CSA to which the buy-in payments relate meets the § 482
regulatory requirements for CSAs.

.05 Critical Assumptions
The taxpayer should propose and describe any relevant critical assumptions. A critical assumption is any fact the continued existence of which is
material to the taxpayer’s proposed TPM, whether related to the taxpayer, a third party, an industry, or business and economic conditions. Critical
assumptions might include, for example, a particular mode of conducting business operations, a particular corporate or business structure, a range of
expected business volume, or the relative value of foreign currencies.
.06 Contents of Annual Report
Section 11.01 provides that the taxpayer must file an annual report for each taxable year covered by the APA. The taxpayer should propose in the
request a list of items to be included in each report. Consideration should be given to all items listed in Appendix C to the APA Program’s current
Model APA.
.07 Term and First Year of APA
1.

The taxpayer must propose a term for the APA appropriate to the industry, products, and transactions involved. Although the appropriate
APA term is determined on a case-by-case basis, a request for an APA should propose an APA term of at least five years unless the
taxpayer states a compelling reason for a shorter term. Additionally, the APA Program strives to have at least three prospective years
remaining in the term upon the execution of an APA (in the case of a unilateral APA) or completion of the APA Program’s recommended
negotiating position for Competent Authority (in the case of a bilateral or multilateral APA), except in unusual circumstances. Accordingly,
taxpayers should anticipate that the APA Program may require their agreement to extend the proposed term of an APA if necessary to
ensure such prospectivity.

2.

The taxpayer must file its APA request within the time prescribed by statute (including extensions) for filing its Federal income tax return for
the first proposed APA year. If the taxpayer receives an extension to file its Federal income tax return, it must file its APA request no later
than the actual filing date of the return. An APA request will be considered filed on the date the required user fee is paid (within the meaning
of § 7502(a)), provided that a substantially complete APA request is filed with the APA Program within 120 days of the return due date
(including extensions) for the first proposed APA year. Because of the need to begin the processing of the APA request in a manner that
ensures appropriate prospectivity, the APA Director will consider extending the 120-day period pursuant to section 2.06 only in unusual
circumstances. If the APA Program’s evaluation of an APA request is delayed due to a lack of responsiveness or timeliness by the taxpayer
subsequent to the filing of its request, the APA Director may deem the taxpayer’s APA request to have been filed for purposes of this
paragraph on a date subsequent to its actual filing.

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 6 of 13

.08 Request for Competent Authority Consideration
1.

The taxpayer must state whether any of the parties to the proposed covered transactions are residents of or conduct activities in a treaty
partner country or U.S. possession, and whether the taxpayer proposes an agreement among competent authorities (see section 7 for
guidelines). For purposes of this revenue procedure, “competent authority” includes the Director, International (LMSB) and designated
foreign competent authorities under income tax treaties to which the U.S. is a party, and also includes the Director, International (LMSB)
acting as the U.S. Competent Authority with respect to a possession tax agency described in Rev. Proc. 89-8, 1989-1 C.B. 778, as well as a
designated possession tax official within the meaning of that revenue procedure.

2.

If the APA request is unilateral and involves transactions with an entity in a treaty jurisdiction, the taxpayer must provide an explanation of
why the request is not bilateral. See sections 2.08 and 7.06.

3.

If the taxpayer requests a bilateral or multilateral APA, the taxpayer’s request must include the information described in section 4.05(a) and
(b) and, in a separate document, section 4.05(n), of Rev. Proc. 2002-52, 2002-2 C.B. 242 (or its successor), or similar information pursuant
to a request for relief under Rev. Proc. 89-8. The following wording satisfies section 4.05(n) of Rev. Proc. 2002-52:

[Name of taxpayer(s)] consents to the disclosure to the competent authority of [name of foreign country] and the competent authority’s staff of any or
all of the items of information set forth or enclosed in the [bilateral/multilateral] APA request for the taxable year(s) [and accompanying rollback
request for relief from economic double taxation of income for the taxable years ], and any further submissions, within the limits contained in the
[name of treaty].
.09 Perjury Statement
1.

The taxpayer must include in any APA request and supplemental submission a declaration in the following form:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this [APA request] [supplemental submission relating to this APA request] including
accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the [APA request] [supplemental submission] contains all the
relevant facts relating to the [APA request] [supplemental submission], and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

2.

The declaration must be signed by the person or persons on whose behalf the request is being made and not by the taxpayer’s
representative. The person signing for a corporate taxpayer must be an authorized officer of the taxpayer who has personal knowledge of the
facts, whose duties are not limited to obtaining letter rulings or determination letters from the Service, or negotiating APAs, and who is
authorized to sign the taxpayer’s income tax return pursuant to § 6062. The person signing for any non-corporate taxpayer must be an
individual who has personal knowledge of the facts, and who is authorized to sign in accordance with §§ 6061 or 6063, as applicable.

.10 Signatures
The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative must sign the APA request. If an authorized representative is to sign, the taxpayer and
representative must satisfy the relevant instructions on signatures in Rev. Proc. 2005-1, 2005-1 I.R.B. 1 (or its successor).
.11 Mailing, Deliveries, Copies, and Office Location
1.

User fees (accompanied by an identifying cover letter that includes a justification of the fee amount) must be sent to:
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU
P.O. Box 7604
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
The fee payment may also be hand delivered to the drop box at the 12th Street entrance of 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington,
DC.

2.

All other communications must be mailed or delivered as follows to (unless arranged otherwise, for example, mailing to the California office):
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
Advance Pricing Agreement Program
Attn: CC:INTL:APA; MA2-266
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20224

3.

The taxpayer must provide the original and eight copies of its APA request and any supplemental materials submitted while the request is
pending.

4.

The APA Program is located at:
799 9th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001

.12 User Fees.
1.

A separate user fee is required for each APA request. For this purpose, an APA request means a substantially complete and timely-filed APA
submission, as required by section 4, and includes all such APA submissions filed by the taxpayer within any single sixty-day period. The
taxpayer, for purposes of the preceding sentence, includes all members of a controlled group as defined in Treasury Regulations § 1.482-1(i)
(6).

2.

User fees shall be made payable to the United States Treasury.

3.

Except as provided in paragraphs (4), (5), and (7), the user fee for an APA request is $50,000.

4.

Except as provided in paragraph (5), the user fee for an APA renewal request is $35,000. For this purpose, an APA request will be
considered an APA renewal request if its subject matter is substantially the same as in a previous APA request by the taxpayer.

5.

The user fee for a small business APA request is $22,500. For this purpose, an APA request will be considered a small business APA
request if the taxpayer has gross income of less than $200 million or the aggregate value of the covered transactions does not exceed (i) $50
million annually, and (ii) $10 million annually with respect to covered transactions involving intangible property.

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

6.

For purposes of paragraph 5, the gross income of a taxpayer includes the gross income of all organizations, trades, or businesses owned or
controlled directly or indirectly by the same interests controlling the taxpayer. Gross income must be computed for the last full (12-month)
taxable year ending before the date the taxpayer filed the APA request. If the information on the taxpayer’s gross income for the last full
taxable year is not available, the taxpayer must use its projected gross income for the first twelve months of the APA term.

7.

The user fee to amend an APA request or to amend a completed APA is $10,000. For this purpose, a request to amend will be deemed to
occur if a taxpayer requests changes to an APA request or to a completed APA that requires substantial additional work by the APA Team.
Generally, no user fee will be imposed if substantial changes are requested by the Service or by a foreign competent authority.

8.

The APA Director may require a corrected user fee after submission of an APA request if the request does not meet the criteria for the user
fee amount initially paid by the taxpayer. The taxpayer may either pay the corrected fee and continue the APA process or withdraw the
request.

Page 7 of 13

SECTION 5: TAXPAYER DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS
.01 Any information submitted by a taxpayer in connection with its APA request must be true, correct, and accurate (see section 4.09). If the APA
Program determines that it needs additional information to analyze the APA request, the APA Program may require the taxpayer to provide such
information.
.02 A taxpayer has an obligation to update on a timely basis all material facts and information that it submits in connection with its APA request. In
addition, while an APA request is pending and after an APA is executed, a taxpayer is under a continuing duty to timely supplement its disclosures if
the taxpayer discovers that information that it provided in connection with an APA request was false, incorrect, or incomplete in some material
respect. If a taxpayer discovers such an error or omission after the APA is executed, the taxpayer must disclose the error or omission in its next-filed
annual report (see section 11.01(1)).
.03 While the APA request is pending, the taxpayer should be prepared to update the financial data for the selected comparables as new or revised
data become available.
.04 If a taxable year is completed while the APA request is pending, the taxpayer should be prepared to update its APA submission following the
close of the taxable year by demonstrating the application of the proposed TPM to the taxpayer’s actual financial results for that year.
.05 Failure by a taxpayer to provide all materials required by this revenue procedure in its APA request (see section 4), or requested by the APA
Program while the request is pending, can cause significant delays in case processing and may result in rejection of the APA under section 6.10.

SECTION 6: PROCESSING OF APA REQUESTS
.01 General
The processing of an APA request follows one of two paths, depending on whether the request is for a bilateral or multilateral APA, or for a unilateral
APA. The scheduling of due diligence, analysis, discussion, agreement, and drafting is designed to complete the recommended U.S. negotiating
position (bilateral or multilateral APA request), or a unilateral APA, within 12 months from the date the full request was filed. The filing of a full APA
request includes not only the payment of a user fee, but also the receipt by the APA Program of the materials specified in sections 4.02 through 4.10.
Significant analysis of the APA request will not begin until a substantially complete request has been filed.
.02 Initial Contact
After receiving an APA request, a representative of the APA Program will contact the taxpayer or its representative to discuss any preliminary
questions the APA Program may have, or to ask for any additional information or documents necessary in order to initiate processing of the request.
The taxpayer must supply the additional information and documents, accompanied by the perjury statement described in section 4.09, by the date
specified by the APA Program, as extended for good cause.
.03 Designation of Team Leader
Upon the receipt of a substantially complete APA request, the APA Director will designate a Team Leader to oversee the APA Team’s activities in
processing the request. If a prefiling conference was held with the taxpayer, the Team Leader generally will be designated from among the APA
Program staff attending the prefiling conference.
.04 Formation of APA Team
The Team Leader will organize the APA Team, which normally consists of the following personnel: the Team Leader, an APA Program economist
and/or a Service Operating Division economist, an LMSB international examiner, a Division Counsel attorney, and, in bilateral or multilateral cases, a
competent authority analyst. In appropriate cases, an LMSB international technical advisor, the international examiner’s manager, and other Service
Operating Division personnel familiar with the taxpayer may serve on the APA Team. If the APA or a rollback of the APA affects taxable years in
Appeals, the appropriate Appeals Officer will be invited to participate. The APA Team Leader will assure that copies of the APA request are
distributed to all Team members for review.
.05 Function of APA Team
The function of the APA Team is the following: (1) for a bilateral or multilateral APA, to develop, in consultation with the taxpayer and consistent with
sound tax administration, a competent authority negotiating position that it can recommend for approval, and (2) for a unilateral APA, to make best
efforts, consistent with sound tax administration, to develop an APA that the APA Program can recommend for approval by the Associate Chief
Counsel (International). The Service Operating Division field office responsible for the taxpayer’s income tax return will be provided an opportunity to
review and comment on the recommended U.S. competent authority negotiating position in the case of a bilateral or multilateral APA, and the
proposed APA in the case of a unilateral APA.
.06 Due Diligence and Analysis
The APA Team will evaluate the taxpayer’s APA request by discussing it with the taxpayer, verifying the data supplied, and requesting additional
supporting data if necessary. The evaluation of the request will not constitute an examination or inspection of the taxpayer’s books and records under
§ 7605(b) or other provisions of the Code.
.07 Schedule for Discussion and Drafting
1.

The APA Team will strive to arrange an initial meeting with the taxpayer to take place within 45 days from the assignment of an APA Team
Leader (and following receipt of the substantially complete APA request). The function of the initial meeting is to review the taxpayer’s facts,
to discuss and clarify issues, and to reach agreement on the scope and nature of the APA Team’s due diligence.

2

In connection with the initial meeting the APA Team and the taxpayer will agree on a Case Plan to which both Service and taxpayer

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 8 of 13

personnel will be expected to adhere. The Case Plan will be signed by both an APA manager and an authorized official of the taxpayer (see
section 4.09(2)). The Case Plan may identify issues raised by the APA Team’s initial review of the APA request. Firm dates should be agreed
upon for resolving all outstanding issues, and case milestones should be cited. Case milestones include: (a) submission of any necessary
additional information by the taxpayer; (b) any planned site visits or interviews; (c) evaluation of the information by the Service; (d) meeting
dates; and (e) presentation of the competent authority negotiating position or recommended agreement to the APA Director. To minimize
delays caused by the need to coordinate different parties’ schedules on short notice, the time and place of future meetings required for any
steps in the case should be agreed upon at the initial meeting and established in the Case Plan.
3.

The time scheduled for completion of the case milestones will depend to some extent on the scope and complexity of the particular case. In
the case of bilateral or multilateral requests, the Service will seek to work with the competent authority of the treaty partner or partners, or the
U.S. possession involved to minimize the time needed for competent authority resolution.

4.

Failures by either the taxpayer or the APA Team to meet case milestones will be addressed promptly. The APA Director will assist in
remedying any difficulties to ensure a course of action to meet case milestones. Substantial or persistent failure by the taxpayer to comply
with the Case Plan may be treated by the APA Program as a withdrawal of the APA request. In this event, if the taxpayer wishes to continue
to pursue the APA, the taxpayer must re-file the request and pay a new user fee.

5.

In some circumstances, development of the case will suggest to both the APA Team and the taxpayer that they adjust some milestone dates.
To preserve flexibility, the APA Team and the taxpayer may amend the Case Plan by written mutual agreement, consistent with the need to
complete the case expeditiously.

6.

If a case is not completed by the date specified in the operative Case Plan, the APA Team Leader and the taxpayer must submit to the APA
Director a joint status report (or separate status reports in the event of disagreement) explaining the substantive or procedural matters
causing the delay and specifying how the parties propose to resolve the outstanding issues and complete the case within a reasonable time.
If the case is not completed by the new target date, APA Program management will hold a status conference. The purpose of the status
conference is to reach agreement on how the case will be resolved. The Associate Chief Counsel (International) may participate in this or
subsequent conferences if the case is not resolved satisfactorily in a timely manner.

.08 Execution
Signature of an APA by the APA Director and the taxpayer will constitute agreement to the APA. For purposes of executing the APA, each taxpayer
that is a member of a consolidated group (as defined in § 1.1502-1) must comply with the provisions of § 1.1502-77. The person signing the APA
request on behalf of the taxpayer must satisfy the requirements of section 4.09(2).
.09 Withdrawing the Request
The taxpayer may withdraw the request at any time before the execution of the APA. The user fee generally will not be refunded if the taxpayer
withdraws its APA request after the due diligence process has been initiated.
.10 Rejecting the Request
The APA Program may decline either to accept any APA request or to execute any APA after a request has been accepted. If the APA Program
declines to execute an APA after the due diligence process has been initiated, the Service normally will retain the user fee, although the fee may be
returned if the APA Program determines that such action would be appropriate under the circumstances. If the APA Program proposes to reject an
APA request, the taxpayer will be granted one conference of right with the APA Director. Other conferences may be granted at the APA Director’s
discretion.

SECTION 7: COMPETENT AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION
.01 When any of the parties to a request are entitled to obtain assistance under the mutual agreement provision of a tax treaty between a foreign
country and the United States, or under Rev. Proc. 89-8, the competent authorities may enter into agreements concerning the APA. Requests similar
to APA requests that are initiated through treaty partners or possession tax agencies and submitted to the U.S. competent authority will be processed
under this revenue procedure and Rev. Proc. 2002-52, as appropriate. In order to provide timely clarification of factual issues, minimize the potential
for miscommunication, and assist in development of a multiple party agreement on a timely basis, the Service will generally initiate coordination
among the taxpayer, the Service, and the competent authorities of treaty partners at the earliest possible stage of consideration of an APA request,
including, where possible, the prefiling stage. In this manner, the U.S. and foreign competent authorities can develop a joint understanding of the
case, which should facilitate negotiation and resolution of competent authority issues. The taxpayer should remain available throughout consideration
of the request to assist the Service in reaching agreement with the foreign competent authority. Final agreement to the negotiated APA will be sought
among the taxpayer, the Service, and the foreign competent authority. As a general matter, the taxpayer should submit APA requests and related
correspondence simultaneously to the Service and to foreign competent authorities involved in the requests.
.02 The purpose of a competent authority agreement is to avoid double taxation or taxation not in accordance with the relevant income tax treaty or
treaties. If such an agreement is not acceptable to the taxpayer, the taxpayer may withdraw the APA request (see section 6.09). If the competent
authorities are unable to reach an agreement, the taxpayer may withdraw its request or, at its discretion, the Service may negotiate and enter into a
unilateral APA with the taxpayer (see section 7.06).
.03 The taxpayer must cooperate with the Service and the U.S. competent authority, pursuant to the standards set forth in Rev. Proc. 2002-52 and
any other applicable revenue procedures.
.04 Taxpayers have an affirmative obligation to identify relevant concerns that may impact competent authority negotiation of an APA request. For
example, it may be necessary for the Service to request sensitive confidential data (including material that may constitute a trade secret), which if
disclosed, could harm the taxpayer’s competitive position. If the taxpayer identifies such sensitive information, the Service will work with the taxpayer
in developing a mechanism to permit consideration or verification by the treaty partner or partners of the information while still preserving its
confidentiality.
.05 When the competent authorities enter into an agreement covering an APA, the Service will, to the extent appropriate, agree to a mutual exchange
of information with the foreign competent authority concerning any subsequent modifications, cancellation, revocation, requests to renew, evaluation
of annual reports, or examination of the taxpayer’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the APA. Bilateral APAs may provide for
simultaneous filing of the annual report with the Service and with the foreign tax administration.
.06 To minimize taxpayer and governmental uncertainty and administrative cost, bilateral or multilateral APAs are generally preferable to unilateral
APAs when competent authority procedures are available with respect to the foreign country or countries involved. In appropriate circumstances,
however, the Service may execute an APA with a taxpayer without reaching a competent authority agreement. The taxpayer must show sufficient
justification for a unilateral APA. In some circumstances, procedures agreed upon with particular foreign competent authorities, or the requirements of
proper relations with treaty partners, may preclude unilateral APAs.
.07 Section 7.05 of Rev. Proc. 2002-52 provides in part that, if a taxpayer reaches a settlement on an issue pursuant to a written agreement, the U.S.
competent authority will endeavor only to obtain a correlative adjustment from a treaty country and will not undertake any actions that would
otherwise change such agreement. The restrictions imposed under section 7.05 of Rev. Proc. 2002-52 with respect to the discretion of the U.S.
competent authority to negotiate correlative relief will not apply to a unilateral APA However a unilateral APA may hinder the ability of the U S

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 9 of 13

competent authority to reach a mutual agreement that will provide relief from double taxation, particularly when a contemporaneous bilateral or
multilateral APA request would have been both effective and practical (within the meaning of § 1.901-2(e)(5)(i)) to obtain consistent treatment of the
APA matters in a treaty country. If there is a settlement with respect to taxable years prior to the first year subject to a unilateral APA based on
rollback of the APA’s TPM (as discussed in sections 2.12 and 8 of this revenue procedure), section 7.05 of Rev. Proc. 2002-52 will apply to the
rollback years in the regular manner.

SECTION 8: ROLLBACK OF TPM
.01 Application of the TPM to tax years prior to those covered by the APA (“rollback” of the TPM) may be an effective means of enhancing voluntary
compliance and of using available resources to address unresolved transfer pricing issues. The taxpayer may request that the Service consider a
rollback (a “rollback request”) in connection with a particular APA request. Under regularly applicable procedures, the Service may determine that the
same or a similar TPM as that agreed to in an APA should be applied to prior years even in the absence of a rollback request. When applying the
TPM to prior years, adjustments may be made to reflect differences in facts, economic conditions, and applicable legal rules. Those adjustments may
be made regardless of whether the taxpayer or the Service initiated the rollback request.
.02 The taxpayer may make a rollback request in its APA request or at any time prior to the execution of the APA. The principles set forth in section
2.12 generally will govern the Service’s consideration of the request. The balance of prospectivity and retroactivity of the total number of years
covered by the proposed overall agreement, and the status of any on-going examination, will also be given consideration in the Service’s decision to
entertain a rollback request. Rollbacks requested after submission of the APA request must be in writing and addressed to the APA Director.
.03 If a rollback request is submitted in connection with a bilateral or multilateral APA, the rollback request will be deemed to constitute an application
for accelerated competent authority consideration as described in section 7.06 of Rev. Proc. 2002-52 (or its successor). The Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (International), the Service Operating Division field office involved, and the U.S. Competent Authority will coordinate consideration of the
request. The taxpayer’s request must include all information required for accelerated competent authority consideration under Rev. Proc. 2002-52 (or
its successor), subject to the rules set forth therein. The taxpayer’s request can pertain to any years prior to the first year to be covered under the
requested APA. As necessary to reach a competent authority agreement, the Service may require that the rollback be applied to one or more
specified years if accelerated competent authority is to be granted. In exercising its discretion over the conduct of accelerated competent authority
consideration, the U.S. Competent Authority will seek to implement the policy concerning APA rollbacks stated in section 2.12.
.04 Rollback requests submitted in connection with a bilateral or multilateral APA and involving a taxable year under the jurisdiction of Appeals will be
deemed to constitute an application for simultaneous Appeals and competent authority consideration. That application is described in section 8 of
Rev. Proc. 2002-52 and is subject to the rules of that section. The Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International), Appeals, and the U.S.
Competent Authority will coordinate consideration of the request. In exercising its discretion in a simultaneous Competent Authority-Appeals
proceeding, the U.S. Competent Authority will seek to implement the policy concerning APA rollbacks stated in section 2.12. Taxpayers are
encouraged to request accelerated competent authority consideration under section 8.03 above, in conjunction with an application for the
simultaneous Appeals and competent authority process.
.05 Subject to the policy stated in section 2.12, the Service official with jurisdiction over the taxable year subject to the rollback has discretion as to
whether the rollback is applied. That official may be either the Service Operating Division executive responsible for the taxpayer’s income tax return,
the National Chief of Appeals, the U.S. Competent Authority (for matters subject to competent authority negotiations), or the Division Counsel (for
matters pending litigation). Except to the extent inconsistent with this revenue procedure, APA rollbacks will be implemented using regularly
applicable procedures for resolving tax issues. Such procedures include but are not limited to closing agreements and other settlement documents
and Forms 870 and 870AD.

SECTION 9: SMALL BUSINESS TAXPAYER APAs
.01 Special Provisions Available to Small Business Taxpayers
At the request of a small business taxpayer (“SBT”), the APA Program may apply any or all of the provisions in this section. A SBT is any U.S.
taxpayer with total gross income of $200 million or less, as determined under section 4.12(6). In addition, SBT procedures will be available for APAs
that cover small transactions described in section 4.12(5). Although transactions involving valuable intangible property or CSAs would not ordinarily
be appropriate for these SBT procedures (because of the complexity of valuing such intangibles), the APA Program will consider employing special
procedures for such transactions on a case-by-case basis.
.02 PFC Procedures
1.

As set forth in the general rules above, a taxpayer contemplating an APA may request a PFC with the APA Program (see section 3). If a PFC
is requested, the APA Program provides informal advice to the taxpayer regarding the taxpayer’s proposal, but ordinarily does not begin
significant due diligence until the taxpayer formally files an APA request and pays the appropriate user fee (see section 6.01). In the case of
an SBT, however, the APA Program will commence its due diligence analysis earlier in the process to accelerate the conclusion of the APA
negotiations.

2.

The APA Program and a SBT may hold a PFC to determine as early as possible the best method for the SBT’s proposed covered
transactions. The APA Program will need a detailed description of the underlying facts and the proposed TPM for the SBT’s proposed
covered transactions at least 60 days prior to the scheduled conference. The SBT may provide the information it maintains under § 6662(e)
to satisfy this requirement. Prior to its prefiling submission, the SBT must consult with the APA Program to determine the information required
to evaluate the SBT’s covered transactions.

3.

An APA Team will evaluate the APA prefiling information to determine items of concern and the additional documentation needed to evaluate
the request. The SBT will be advised of the APA Team’s initial conclusions before the PFC so that it can address these items before or at the
conference.

4.

At the PFC, the SBT and APA Program will agree on a schedule with the objective of finalizing the recommended negotiating position for a
bilateral APA, or concluding a unilateral APA, within six months of the date the SBT files its APA request. The APA Program expects that
performing this analysis earlier in the process should result in a reduced number of post-filing meetings and supplemental information
requests.

.03 Items Required for an SBT APA Request
Before an SBT submits an APA request, the APA Program and the SBT may agree to reduce or eliminate specific items that would otherwise be
required by section 4.
.04 Locale and Number of Meetings for SBT APA Requests
The APA Program will endeavor to hold meetings with the SBT at a location convenient to the SBT. To minimize the number of meetings,
teleconferences will be employed whenever feasible.
.05 Assistance in Economic Analysis

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 10 of 13

At the SBT’s request, the APA Program will assist the SBT in the selection and evaluation of comparables, as well as the computation of any
appropriate adjustments to comparables.
.06 APA
For unilateral APA requests, a SBT should submit a proposed draft APA in a form substantially similar to the APA Program’s current Model APA (see
Announcement 2005-27, 2005-16 I.R.B. 918, 950). The electronic component of the APA request should include a “redline” version showing the
differences between the Model APA and the SBT’s proposed draft APA (see section 4.02(6)).
.07 APA Program’s Consideration of Other Alternative Procedures
The APA Program may consider other procedures suggested by the SBT to reduce the SBT’s administrative and financial burden, consistent with the
objectives of the APA Program and the requirements of § 482.

SECTION 10: LEGAL EFFECT OF THE APA
.01 An APA is a binding agreement between the taxpayer and the Service. See sections 2.01 - 2.04.
.02 If the taxpayer complies with the terms and conditions of the APA, the Service will not contest the application of the TPM to the subject matter of
the APA except as provided in this revenue procedure. The taxpayer remains otherwise subject to U.S. income tax laws and applicable income tax
conventions.
.03 An APA will have no legal effect except with respect to the taxpayer, taxable years, and transactions to which the APA specifically relates.
.04 Unless provided otherwise by written agreement or regulations, the Service and the taxpayer may not introduce the APA or non-factual oral and
written representations made in conjunction with the APA request as evidence in any judicial or administrative proceeding regarding any tax year,
transaction, or person not covered by the APA. This paragraph does not preclude the Service and the taxpayer from agreeing to roll back the APA
TPM, or the Service’s use of any non-factual material otherwise discoverable or obtained other than in the APA process merely because the parties
considered the same or similar material in the APA process.
.05 Unless provided otherwise by written agreement or regulations, the Service and the taxpayer may not introduce a proposed, cancelled, or
revoked APA, or any non-factual oral or written representations or submissions made during the APA process, as an admission by the other party, in
any judicial or administrative proceeding regarding any taxable year of the requested APA term. This paragraph does not preclude the Service’s use
of any non-factual material otherwise discoverable or obtained other than in the APA process merely because the APA Program and the taxpayer
considered the same or similar material in the APA process.

SECTION 11: ADMINISTERING THE APA
.01 Annual Reports
1.

For each taxable year covered by the APA, the taxpayer must file a timely and complete annual report describing its actual operations for the
year and demonstrating compliance with the APA’s terms and conditions. The report must include all items required by the APA, describe
any pending or contemplated requests to renew, modify or cancel the APA, and report any adjustments made pursuant to section 11.02. In
addition, the annual report must identify any material information submitted while the APA request was pending that the taxpayer discovers
during the taxable year was false, incorrect, or incomplete. See section 5.02.

2.

The taxpayer must file an original and four copies of the annual report by the later of (a) 90 days after the time prescribed by statute
(including extensions) for filing its federal income tax return for the year covered by the report, or (b) 90 days after the effective date of the
APA. The Service and the taxpayer may agree to alternative filing dates. The taxpayer should file the original annual report and copies with
the APA Director in Washington, D.C., as indicated in section 4.11. For bilateral or multilateral APAs, the Service may require the taxpayer to
file simultaneously a copy of the annual report with the treaty partner or partners.

3.

The Service Operating Division or the APA Program Office will contact the taxpayer regarding an annual report if it is necessary to clarify or
complete the information submitted in the annual report. The taxpayer must supply the additional information by the date specified.

4.

Any contact between the Service Operating Division, or the APA Program Office, and the taxpayer to clarify or complete the information in an
annual report is not an examination or the commencement of an examination of the taxpayer for purposes of § 7605(b) or any other Code
provision.

5.

If a filed annual report contains incomplete or incorrect information, or reports an incorrect application of the TPM, the taxpayer must amend
it within 45 days after becoming aware of the need to amend the report. The time may be extended for good cause.

6.

An annual report must contain the following declaration:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this annual report including accompanying documents, and, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, this annual report contains all the relevant facts relating to the annual reporting requirements
pursuant to the APA, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.
[If applicable: An adjustment to conform taxable income and other relevant items to reflect the results reported herein has
been reported to the appropriate responsible Service Operating Division personnel.]
[If applicable: An amended income tax return to conform taxable income and other relevant items to reflect the results
reported herein [has been] [will be] filed with the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Center.]

7.

The taxpayer must sign the declaration in compliance with sections 4.09 (Perjury Statement) and 4.10 (Signatures).

8.

Failure to file a timely, complete, or accurate annual report may be grounds for canceling or revoking the APA under sections 11.06.

.02 APA Primary Adjustments, Secondary Adjustments, and Revenue Procedure Treatment
1.

APA Primary Adjustments. The APA provides the TPM for determining the proper amount of the taxpayer’s gross or net income, deductions,
credits, or allowances with respect to the APA’s covered transactions. In general, the taxpayer’s actual covered transactions during an APA
year, as reported in its books and records, should comply with the TPM and be clearly reflected on the taxpayer’s timely-filed original return
for the year. Under some TPMs, however, the taxpayer may have to wait until the close of the taxable year to determine whether the
intercompany prices it actually paid or received complied with the TPM (for example, a comparable profits method providing for a particular
operating margin range). If the taxpayer’s actual covered transactions do not comply with the TPM, the taxpayer must nonetheless report its
taxable income in an amount consistent with the TPM (an “APA primary adjustment”) on either a timely-filed original return or an amended

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 11 of 13

return. The generally applicable Code rules, including additions to tax, penalties and interest, apply with respect to an APA primary
adjustment. When the taxpayer makes an APA primary adjustment, an appropriate correlative adjustment will also be made with respect to
the related foreign entity affected by the APA primary adjustment. See § 1.482-1(g)(2). To the extent the APA covers years for which federal
income tax returns were filed prior to, or no later than 60 days after, the effective date of the APA, the taxpayer must file, unless otherwise
agreed to in the APA, an amended return or returns that reflect any required primary adjustment and pay any tax due because of such
adjustments, within 120 days of entering into the APA. The generally applicable Code rules will apply with respect to the primary adjustment
with respect to the APA years for which federal income tax returns were filed before the APA was executed, except: (a) the computation of
any required estimated tax installments for the taxable year will not take into account the primary adjustment and related secondary
adjustments (see section 11.02(2)); and (b) the taxpayer will not be subject to the failure to pay penalties under §§ 6651 and 6655, or the
failure to make timely deposit of taxes penalty under § 6656, by reason of the primary adjustment and related secondary adjustments.
2.

Secondary Adjustments. Absent an election of the APA revenue procedure treatment described in section 11.02(3), an APA primary
adjustment requires a secondary adjustment to conform the taxpayer’s accounts. The secondary adjustment may result in additional tax
consequences. See § 1.482-1(g)(3).

3.

APA Revenue Procedure Treatment. If a taxpayer makes an APA primary adjustment, the taxpayer and its related foreign entity may elect
APA revenue procedure treatment and avoid the possible adverse tax consequences of a secondary adjustment that would otherwise follow
the APA primary adjustment. Under APA revenue procedure treatment, consistent with the principles of Rev. Proc. 99-32, 1999-2 C.B. 296,
the taxpayer will be permitted to establish an account receivable from, or payable to, its related foreign entity in the amount of the APA
primary adjustment as of the last day of the taxable year to which the APA primary adjustment applies. The account will not bear interest and
must be paid within 90 days of the later of (a) the date for timely filing (with extensions) of the federal income tax return for the taxable year to
which the APA primary adjustment applies, or (b) the APA’s effective date. The account must be paid within the 90 day period to receive
revenue procedure treatment. Payment must be in the form of money, a written debt obligation payable at a fixed date and bearing interest at
an arm’s length rate as provided in § 1.482-2(a)(2), or through an accounting entry offsetting such account against an existing bona fide debt
between the U.S. taxpayer and the related foreign entity. The taxpayer must document the payment or offset of the account, and disclose it in
the APA annual report for the year of the payment.

4.

The Service will give effect to an APA primary adjustment, secondary adjustment, and payment under APA revenue procedure treatment, if
applicable, for all U.S. income tax purposes. The tax treatment of any such adjustment or payment depends on the facts and circumstances
of the adjustment or payment. For example, if a taxpayer’s APA primary adjustment involves the reporting of an additional royalty expense for
a transaction with a related foreign entity, the Service will deem a payment in the nature of a royalty in the amount of the APA primary
adjustment to have been made by the taxpayer to the related foreign entity. This deemed payment may be subject to U.S. withholding tax,
and interest would accrue on the tax required to be withheld from the due date of the taxpayer’s federal income tax return without regard to
extensions. Similarly, a taxpayer’s APA revenue procedure treatment may involve the recharacterization of a dividend paid by its foreign
subsidiary as a payment of an account receivable established in connection with an APA primary adjustment. Any foreign tax withheld from
the payment may be treated as a noncompulsory payment ineligible for the foreign tax credit, unless the taxpayer exhausts all effective and
practical remedies, including invocation of competent authority procedures, to obtain consistent treatment that would eliminate the foreign tax
liability. See § 1.901-2(e)(5).

5.

If the Service proposes a tax adjustment or the taxpayer files an amended return that does not require an APA primary adjustment, generally
applicable Code rules will apply.

6.

If the taxpayer requests a bilateral or multilateral APA, the U.S. Competent Authority will discuss the principles of this section with the
appropriate foreign competent authority to seek substantially identical treatment of the taxpayer’s related foreign entity.

.03 Examination
1.

With respect to the application of § 482 to the covered transactions, the Service will limit the examination of a taxpayer’s income tax return for
a tax year covered by an APA to the requirements described in the next paragraph and will not reconsider the TPM.

2.

For the year under examination, the Service may require the taxpayer to establish: (a) compliance with the APA’s terms and conditions; (b)
validity and accuracy of the annual report’s material representations; (c) correctness of the supporting data and computations used to apply
the TPM; (d) satisfaction of the critical assumptions; and (e) consistent application of the TPM.

3.

The Service Operating Division must inform the APA Director if the taxpayer has not satisfied any requirement in the prior paragraph. After
consulting with the appropriate Service Operating Division personnel, the Associate Chief Counsel (International) may decide to apply the
terms of the APA, or revise (see section 11.05), cancel, or revoke (see section 11.06) the APA.

4.

The Service Operating Division may audit and propose adjustments to the taxpayer’s operating results as determined under the TPM without
affecting the APA’s validity or applicability. The taxpayer may agree with the proposed adjustments in the same manner as any other
adjustment, and the Service Operating Division will assess any resulting additional tax or refund any resulting overpayment of tax. If the
taxpayer does not agree with the proposed adjustment, the taxpayer may contest it through the normal administrative and judicial
procedures. The taxpayer must include the audit adjustments as finally determined for the purpose of applying the TPM and, as necessary,
make any APA primary, secondary and correlative adjustments under section 11.02. APA revenue procedure treatment under section 11.02
(3) is unavailable for audit adjustments.

.04 Record Retention
1.

The taxpayer must maintain books and records sufficient to enable the Service Operating Division to examine whether the taxpayer has
complied with the APA. The taxpayer’s compliance with this paragraph fulfills the record-keeping requirements of §§ 6038A and 6038C as
applied to the covered transactions.

2.

Upon examination, the Service Operating Division may submit a written request to the taxpayer requiring the submission of requested
information or the translation of specific documents within 30 days, as extended for good cause. The fact that a foreign jurisdiction may
impose a penalty upon the taxpayer or other person for disclosing the material will not constitute reasonable cause for noncompliance with
the Service Operating Division’s request.

.05 Revising the APA
1.

An APA may be revised by agreement of the parties, consistent with the principles set forth herein and the interests of sound tax
administration. The Associate Chief Counsel (International) may agree to revise an APA in lieu of canceling or revoking it. If the parties agree
to revise the APA, the revised APA will indicate its effective date.

2.

If the parties agree to revise a bilateral or multilateral APA, the Team Leader will submit the revised APA to the U.S. Competent Authority to
obtain the consent of the foreign competent authority. If the foreign competent authority refuses to accept the revised APA, or if the
competent authorities cannot agree on a revised APA acceptable to all parties, the APA Director and the taxpayer may agree to: (a) apply the
existing APA, if appropriate; (b) apply the revised APA or agree to further revisions; or (c) request the Associate Chief Counsel (International)
to cancel the APA as of an agreed date. If the APA Director and the taxpayer cannot agree on how to proceed, the Associate Chief Counsel
(International) will cancel the APA pursuant to section 11.06.

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 12 of 13

.06 Revoking or Canceling the APA
1.

The Associate Chief Counsel (International) may revoke an APA due to fraud or malfeasance (as defined in § 7121), or disregard (as defined
in § 6662(b)(1) and (c)) by the taxpayer in connection with the APA, including, but not limited to, fraud, malfeasance, or disregard involving
(a) material facts in the request or subsequent submissions (including an annual report) or (b) lack of good faith compliance with the APA’s
terms and conditions.

2.

The Associate Chief Counsel (International) may cancel an APA due to the taxpayer’s misrepresentation, mistake as to a material fact, failure
to state a material fact, failure to file a timely annual report, or lack of good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of the APA.

3.

Unless the parties agree to revise the APA, the Associate Chief Counsel (International) will cancel an APA in the event of a failure of a critical
assumption, or a material change in governing case law, statute, regulation, or a treaty (as described in section 11.07).

4.

For purposes of this section 11.06(1) and (2) the Associate Chief Counsel (International) will consider facts as material if, for example,
knowledge of the facts could reasonably have resulted in an APA with significantly different terms and conditions. In regard to annual reports,
the Associate Chief Counsel (International) will consider facts as material if, for example, knowledge of the facts would have resulted in (a) a
materially different allocation of income, deductions, or credits than reported in the annual report, or (b) the failure to meet a critical
assumption.

5.

The Associate Chief Counsel (International) may waive cancellation if the taxpayer can satisfactorily show good faith and reasonable cause
and agrees to make any adjustment proposed to correct for the misrepresentation, mistake as to a material fact, failure to state a material
fact, or noncompliance.

6.

If the Associate Chief Counsel (International) revokes an APA, the revocation relates back to the first day of the APA’s first taxable year. The
Service may: (a) determine deficiencies in income taxes and additions thereto; (b) deny relief under Rev. Proc. 99-32, 1999-2 C.B. 296; (c)
allow the taxpayer relief under Rev. Proc. 99-32, but determine the interest on any account receivable established under Rev. Proc. 99-32,
section 4.01, without mutual agreement or correlative relief; (d) revoke the APA as an “egregious case” under Rev. Rul. 80-231, 1980-2 C.B.
219, so as to deny the taxpayer a foreign tax credit; and (e) not make available the unilateral relief provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-52 (see
section 12.07). The Service will seek to coordinate any action concerning revocation of a bilateral or multilateral APA with the foreign
competent authority.

7.

If the Associate Chief Counsel (International) cancels an APA, the cancellation normally relates back to the beginning of the year in which the
critical assumption failed, or the beginning of the year to which the misrepresentation, mistake as to a material fact, failure to state a material
fact, or noncompliance relates. If, however, the cancellation results from a change in case law, statute, regulation, or treaty, the cancellation
normally relates back to the beginning of the year that contains the effective date of the change in case law, statute, regulation, or treaty.

8.

As of the effective date of the cancellation, the APA has no further force and effect with respect to the Service and the taxpayer for U.S.
income tax purposes. The Service will seek to coordinate any action concerning the cancellation of a bilateral or multilateral APA with the
foreign competent authority.

.07 Change in Case Law, Statute, Regulation, or Treaty
If applicable U.S. case law, statutes, regulations, or treaties change the federal income tax treatment of any matter covered by the APA, the new
case law, statute, regulation, or treaty provision supersedes inconsistent terms and conditions of the APA.

SECTION 12: RENEWING THE APA
.01 A taxpayer may request renewal of an APA using the procedures for initial APA requests. To expedite the preparation and evaluation of an APA
renewal request, however, taxpayers are encouraged to request a prefiling conference to discuss with the APA Program the suitability of streamlined
submission requirements. Taxpayers are encouraged to file the renewal request nine months before the expiration of the APA term.
.02 The APA Program will endeavor to expedite the processing of a renewal APA. Expedited processing will be most likely where the taxpayer
demonstrates that the following conditions exist: (a) substantially the same law and policy applied to the existing APA; (b) no substantial differences
exist between the taxpayer’s proposed TPM and the TPM under the existing APA; (c) no material changes occurred in the taxpayer’s facts or
circumstances since the parties entered into the existing APA; and (d) for a bilateral APA, a rollback or closed year considerations did not influence
the TPM in the existing APA.
.03 If the conditions in the prior paragraph exist, the APA Team begins its evaluation of the renewal APA by considering the continuing applicability of
the existing APA, using updated comparables as appropriate. The APA Team will focus on any changed facts and circumstances. While the APA
Team will endeavor to streamline the renewal process, certain cases may require additional analysis. That is, experience and insight gained from
applying the TPM to actual data (for example, APA annual reports) may provide insight that indicates the need to modify the TPM. The APA Program
will use its best efforts to advise the taxpayer at a prefiling conference whether a streamlined APA renewal process will be achievable.

SECTION 13: DISCLOSURE
.01 An APA, any background information related to the APA, and the taxpayer’s APA request for that APA, are return information and are
confidential. See §§ 6103, 6105, 894, and 7852(d).
.02 An APA, any background information related to the APA, and the taxpayer’s APA request, are not “written determinations,” and they are not open
to public inspection. See § 6110.
.03 The Secretary must prepare an annual report for public disclosure. See § 521(b) of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of
1999, Pub. L. 106-170, 113 Stat. 1860, 1925. That report includes specifically designated information concerning all APAs, but in a form that does
not identify taxpayers or their trade secrets or proprietary or confidential business or financial information.
.04 An APA, any annual reports, and any factual information contained in the background files is subject to exchange of information under income tax
treaties or tax information exchange agreements in accordance with the terms of such treaties and agreements (including terms regarding relevancy,
confidentiality and the protection of trade secrets). In cases where the exchange of information would be discretionary, information may be
exchanged to the extent consistent with sound tax administration and the practices of the relevant foreign competent authority, including where
relevant the existence and application by the foreign competent authority of rules similar to those described in sections 10.04 and 10.05.

SECTION 14: EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2004-40, 2004-2 C.B. 50, is superseded.

SECTION 15: EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure will apply to all APA requests including requests for renewal received on or after February 1 2006 By agreement this

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012

Internal Revenue Bulletin - January 9, 2006 - Rev. Proc. 2006-9

Page 13 of 13

revenue procedure may apply to any APA resulting from an APA request pending on such date.

SECTION 16: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
The collections of information contained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545-1503.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information
displays a valid control number.
The collections of information are in sections 3.06, 4, 5, 8.03, 11.01, 11.02(1), 11.04, 11.05 and 12.01. This information is required to provide the
Service sufficient information to evaluate and process the APA request or request for renewal of an existing APA, or to determine whether the
taxpayer is in compliance with the terms and conditions of an APA. This information will be used to evaluate the proposed TPM, and the taxpayer’s
compliance with the terms and conditions of any APA to which it is a party. The collections of information are required to obtain an APA. The likely
respondents are business or other for-profit institutions.
The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 8200 hours.
The estimated average burden for an APA prefiling conference is 10 hours; the estimated average burden for an APA request is 50 hours; and the
estimated average burden for preparation of an annual report by a party to an APA is 15 hours. The estimated number of respondents and/or
recordkeepers is 230.
The estimated annual frequency of responses is one request or report per year per applicant or party to an APA, except that a taxpayer requesting an
APA may also request a prefiling conference.
Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any
internal revenue law. Generally tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103.

DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal authors of this document are various members of the Advance Pricing Agreement Program of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, please contact Mr. Craig A. Sharon or Mr. Craig R. Gilbert at (202) 4355220 (not a toll-free number).
Prev

Up
Home

Next

More Internal Revenue Bulletins

http://www.irs.gov/irb/2006-02_IRB/ar12.html

8/27/2012