0659ss15

0659ss15.docx

NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR part 60, subpart SS) (Renewal)

OMB: 2060-0108

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf



SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal)


1. Identification of the Information Collection


1(a) Title of the Information Collection


NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 0659.15, OMB Control Number 2060-0108.


1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract


The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Surface Coating of Large Appliances were proposed on December 24, 2980; promulgated on October 27, 1982; and most-recently revised on October 17, 2000. These regulations apply to large appliance coating facilities. New facilities include those that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS.


In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance and are required of all affected facilities subject to NSPS.


Any owner/operator subject to these provisions of this part shall maintain a file containing these documents and retain the file for at least two years following the generation date of such reports and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. If there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office.


The “Affected Public” includes facilities that perform surface coating of large appliance products. The “burden” to the Affected Public may be found at the end of this document in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal). The “burden” to the Federal Government is attributed entirely to work performed by either Federal employees or government contractors and may be found at the end of this document in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal). There are approximately 16 large appliances surface coating facilities. None of the facilities in the United States are owned by either state, local, or tribal entities or the Federal government. They are all owned and operated by privately-owned, for-profit businesses. We assume that they will all respond to EPA inquiries.


Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site).


Over the next three years, approximately 16 respondents per year will be subject to these standards, and no additional respondents per year will become subject to these same standards. The number of respondents has been adjusted downwards from the currently-active ICR to reflect a more accurate estimate of subject sources, based on data collected through EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database and a review of large appliance surface coating facilities subject to other federal regulations.


The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currently-active ICR without any “Terms of Clearance,”


2. Need for and Use of the Collection


2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection


The EPA is charged under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect:


. . . application of the best technological system of continuous emissions reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or any non-air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated. Section 111(a)(l).


The Agency refers to this charge as selecting the best-demonstrated technology (BDT). Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every eight years.


In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:


(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.


In the Administrator's judgment, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from surface coating operations either cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and/or welfare. Therefore, the NSPS were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS.


2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data


The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in these standards ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.


Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility’s initial capability to comply with these emission standards. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with these same standards at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor.


The notifications required in these standards are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of these regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired, and that these standards are being met. The performance test may also be observed.


The required quarterly and semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify operation/maintenance procedures, and for compliance determinations.


3. Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria


The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS.


3(a) Non-duplication


If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exist.


3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB


An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register (86 FR 8634) on February 8, 2021. No comments were received on the ‘burden’ published in the Federal Register for this renewal.


3(c) Consultations


The Agency has consulted industry experts and internal data sources to project the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three years. The primary source of information as reported by industry, in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in these standarsd, is the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS). ICIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for industrial and government-owned facilities. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency’s internal industry experts. Approximately 16 respondents will be subject to these standards over the three-year period covered by this ICR. The number of respondents has been adjusted downwards from the currently-active ICR to reflect a more accurate estimate of subject sources, based on data collected through EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database and a review of large appliance surface coating facilities subject to other federal regulations.


Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with these standards as they were being developed and these same standards have been reviewed previously to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this ICR, we contacted both the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, at (202) 872-5955, and the Air Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, at (703) 524-8800.


It is our policy to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal, as well as for those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. In this case, no comments were received.


3(d) Effects of Less-requent Collection


Less-frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet these standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting violations would be less likely.


3(e) General Guidelines


These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR Part 1320, Section 1320.5.


3(f) Confidentiality


Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B - Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).


3(g) Sensitive Questions


The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in these standards do not include sensitive questions.


4. The Respondents and the Information Requested


4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes


The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are facilities that conduct surface coating of large appliances. The United States Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for the respondents affected by the standards and the corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes are presented in the following table:



Standard (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS)


SIC Codes


NAICS Codes

Household Cooking Equipment

3631

335220

Household Refrigerators and Home and Farm Freezers

3632

335220

Household Laundry Equipment

3633

335220

Household Appliances, Not Elsewhere Classified

3639

335210, 335220, 333249




4(b) Information Requested


(i) Data Items


In this ICR, all the data that are recorded or reported is required by the NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS).


A source must make the following reports:



Notifications

Notification of construction/reconstruction

§60.7(a)(1)

Notification of initial performance test

§60.8(d)

Notification of actual startup

§60.7(a)(3)

Notification of a physical or operational change.

§60.7(a)(4)



Reports

Initial performance test results

§§60.8(a), 60.455(a)

Demonstration of continuous monitoring system

§60.7(a)(5)

Semiannual report

§§60.7(c), 60.455(b)-(c)

Excess emissions and monitoring systems performance reports

§§60.7(c), 60.455(b)-(c)


A source must keep the following records:



Recordkeeping

Startups, shutdowns, malfunction, periods where the continuous monitoring system is inoperative.

§60.7(b)

Records are required to be retained for two years at the facility.

§60.455(d)

Maintain a file of all measurements including the monitoring device, performance testing measurements, and monitoring device calibrations, checks, adjustments and maintenance performed on these devices. Monthly performance test.

§§60.7(e), 60.455(a), 60.7(d)

Maintain daily records of incinerator combustion temperature, or amounts of solvent recovered.

§§60.454(a)(3), 60.455(d)

Where compliance is achieved through use of thermal incineration, each 3-hour period of coating operation during which the average temperature of the device was more than 28 °C (50 °F) below the average temperature of the device during the most recent performance test at which destruction efficiency was determined.

§60.455(c)(1)


Electronic Reporting


Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site.


Electronic copies of records may also be maintained in order to satisfy federal recordkeeping requirements. For additional information on the Paperwork Reduction Act requirements for CEDRI and ERT for this rule, see: https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/paperwork-reduction-act-pra-cedri-and-ert.


(ii) Respondent Activities


Respondent Activities

Familiarization with the regulatory requirements.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity, or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure for control device.

Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 24 test, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for disclosing and providing information.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.


5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management


5(a) Agency Activities


The EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information:


Agency Activities

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) and ICIS.


5(b) Collection Methodology and Management


Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with the emission standards, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The quarterly and semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.


Information contained in the reports is reported by state and local governments in the ICIS Air database, which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. ICIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for industrial and government-owned facilities. The EPA uses ICIS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by both local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices, and EPA headquarters. The EPA and its delegated authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.


The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for two years.


5(c) Small Entity Flexibility


The majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced.


5(d) Collection Schedule


The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown at the end of this document in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal).


6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection


Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of ‘Burden’ under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.


The Agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.


6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden


The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 1,600 hours (Total Labor Hours from Table 1 below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of this regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously-approved ICR, and any comments received.


6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs


(i) Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates:


Managerial $149.84 ($71.35 + 110%)

Technical $122.66 ($58.41 + 110%)

Clerical $60.88 ($28.99 + 110%)


These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2020, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.


(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs


The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard(s) are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one-time costs when a facility becomes subject to these regulations. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitors and other costs such as photocopying and postage.


(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs



Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs


(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device


(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent


(C)

Number of New Respondents


(D)

Total Capital/ Startup Cost, (B X C)


(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent


(F)

Number of Respondents with O&M1


(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)


Temperature


8,000


0


$0


$2,100


1


$2,100

1 Five percent of facilities use incineration (16 x 0.05 = 0.8, rounded to 1).

Note: Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.


The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are $0. This is the total of column D in the above table.


The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this ICR are $2,100. This is the total of column G.


The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $2,100. These are the record-keeping costs.


6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost


The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported information. The EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes such activities as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.


The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $4,400.


This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:


Managerial $69.04 (GS-13, Step 5, $43.15 + 60%)

Technical $51.23 (GS-12, Step 1, $32.02 + 60%)

Clerical $27.73 (GS-6, Step 3, $17.33 + 60%)


These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2021 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to Federal government employees. Details upon which this estimate is based appear at the end of this document in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal).


6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs


Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three years, approximately 16 existing respondents will be subject to these standards. It is estimated that no additional respondents per year will become subject to these same standards. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 16 per year.


The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three years covered by this ICR:



Number of Respondents




Respondents That Submit Reports


Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports





Year


(A)

Number of New Respondents 1


(B)

Number of Existing Respondents


(C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports


(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents


(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1


0


16


0


0


16

2


0


16


0


0


16

3


0


16


0


0


16

Average


0


16


0


0


16

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.


Column D is subtracted to avoid double-counting respondents. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of this ICR is 16.


The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the following table:



Total Annual Responses


(A)


Information Collection Activity


(B)


Number of Respondents


(C)


Number of Responses


(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports


(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Notification of construction/ reconstruction

0

1

0

0

Notification of performance test

0

1

0

0

Notification of actual startup

0

1

0

0

Report of performance test

0

1.2

0

0

Semiannual report

16

2

0

32

Quarterly excess emissions report and semiannual monitoring systems performance report

3.36

2

0

6.72








Total (rounded)


39


The number of Total Annual Responses is 39 (rounded).


The total annual labor costs are $190,000. Details regarding these estimates may be found at the end of this document in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal).


6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables


The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2 at the end of this document, respectively, and summarized below.




(i) Respondent Tally


The total annual labor hours are 1,600. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal).


We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records.


Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 41 hours per response.


The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $2,100. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.



(ii) The Agency Tally


The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 89 labor hours at a cost of $4,400; see below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal).


We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies and maintain records.


6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden


There is an adjustment decrease in the total estimated burden from the most-recently approved ICR. This increase is not due to any program changes. The adjustment decrease in burden from the most-recently approved ICR is due to a decrease in the number of sources. The number of respondents has been adjusted downwards from the most-recently approved ICR to reflect a more accurate estimate of subject sources, based on data collected through EPA’s Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database and a review of large appliance coating facilities subject to other Federal regulations. The decrease in the number of respondents also results in a decrease in the operation and maintenance costs. There are no estimated new respondents anticipated in the next three years, therefore, there are no capital costs. There is a slight increase in the hourly labor costs, which is wholly due to the use of updated labor rates. This ICR uses labor rates from the most-recent Bureau of Labor Statistics report (September 2020) to calculate respondent burden costs.


6(g) Burden Statement


The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 41 hours per response. ‘Burden’ means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information either to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.


An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.


To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0653. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/, which may be used to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Due to COVID-19 precautions, entry to the Reading Room is available by appointment only. Please contact personnel in the Reading Room to schedule an appointment. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the docket center is (202) 566-1752. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0653 and OMB Control Number 2060-0108 in any correspondence.


Part B of the Supporting Statement


This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal)


BURDEN ITEM

Person‑Hours per occurrence
(A)

Number of occurrences per year
(B)

Person‑Hours per respondent per year
(C=AxB)
(C)

Respondents per Year a
(D)

Technical Person Hours per Year
(E=CxD)
(E)

Managerial Person Hours per Year
(F=Ex0.05)
(F)

Clerical Person Hours per Year
(G=Ex0.10)
(G)

Annual Costs per Year b
(H)

1. Applications

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Survey and Studies

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Reporting requirements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements

1

1

1

16

16

0.8

1.6

$2,179.85

B. Required Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Performance Tests

60

1

60

0

0

0

0

$0

Repeat Performance Tests

60

0.2

12

0

0

0

0

$0

C. Gather Existing Information

See 3b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D. Write Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction

2

1

2

0

0

0

0

$0

Notification of Initial Performance Test

2

1

2

0

0

0

0

$0

Notification of Actual Startup

2

1

2

0

0

0

0

$0

Report of Performance Test

See 3b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Semiannual Report c

5

2

10

16

160

8

16

$21,798.50

Quarterly Excess Emissions Report and Semiannual Monitoring Systems Performance Report d

4

2

8

3

27

1

3

$3,662.15

Subtotal for Reporting Requirements

 

 

 

 

233

$27,641

4. Recordkeeping requirements

 

A. Familiarization with regulatory requirements

See 3b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B. Plan activities

See 3b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C. Implement activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monthly Performance Test e

1

12

12

16

192

9.6

19.2

$26,158.20

D. Develop record system

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Records of Operating Parameter f

0.25

250

62.5

16

1000

50

100

$136,240.65

Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements

 

 

 

 

1,371

$162,399

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)g

 

 

 

 

1,600

$190,000

TOTAL CAPITAL AND O&M COST (rounded)g

 

 

 

 

 

$2,100

GRAND TOTAL (rounded)g

 

 

 

 

 

$192,000


Assumptions:

a We have assumed that there are approximately 16 existing sources currently subject to this rule, with no additional new sources becoming subject to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR.

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $149.84 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $122.66 per hour for Technical labor, and $60.88 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2020, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from “column 1, Total Compensation." The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

c We have assumed that each respondent will take 5 hours twice per year to complete the semiannual report.

d We have assumed that 15 respondents will take 4 hours twice per year to write the excess emission report and temperature variance report. We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents (0.20*16=3.2 facilities) will exceed the emission standard in 40 CFR 60.452 at least once in each of two quarterly reporting periods, so will be required to write the quarterly excess emission report in 40 CFR 60.455(b) twice per year. We have assumed that 5% of respondents (i.e., 0.05*16=0.8 facilities) use incineration, and that 20% of these 4 respondents with incineration (0.20*0.8=0.16) will exceed their temperature limit during both 6-month periods of each year, so will be required to prepare semiannual monitoring exceedance reports twice per year under 40 CFR 60.455(c). (3.2 respondents + 0.16 respondents =3.36 respondents)

e We have assumed that each respondent will take one hour once per month to record the monthly performance test.

f We have assumed that each respondent will take 0.25 hours 250 times per year to record operating parameter.

g Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.



Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart SS) (Renewal)


Activity

EPA Hours per Occurrence
(A)

Number of occurrences per year
(B)

EPA Person Hours per Year
(C=AxB)
(C)

Respondents per Year
(D)
a

Technical Person Hours per Year
(E=CxD)
(E)

Managerial Person Hours per Year
(F=Ex0.05)
(F)

Clerical Person Hours per Year
(G=Ex0.10)
(G)

Annual Costs ($/year) b
(H)

Required activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial performance test

24

1

24

0

0

0

0

$0

Repeat performance test

24

0.2

4.8

0

0

0

0

$0

Report review

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction

2

1

2

0

0

0

0

$0

Notification of Actual Startup

0.5

1

0.5

0

0

0

0

$0

Notification of Initial Performance Test

0.5

1

0.5

0

0

0

0

$0

Performance Test Results

8

1.2

9.6

0

0

0

0

$0

Semiannual Reports c

2

2

4

16

64

3.2

6.4

$3,677.24

Quarterly Excess Emissions Report and Semiannual Monitoring Systems Performance Report e

2

2

4

3

13.44

0.672

1.344

$772.22

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded) e

 

 

 

 

89

$4,400


Assumptions:

a We have assumed that there are approximately 16 existing sources currently subject to this rule. There will be no additional new sources that will become subject to the rule over the three-year period of this ICR.

b This cost is based on the following labor rates: Managerial rate of $69.04 (GS-13, Step 5, $43.15 + 60%), Technical rate of $51.23 (GS-12, Step 1, $32.02 + 60%), and Clerical rate of $27.73 (GS-6, Step 3, $17.33 + 60%). The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2021 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay.

c We have assumed that EPA will take two hours twice per year to review semiannual reports.

d We have assumed that EPA will take 2 hours twice per year to review quarterly excess emissions and semiannual monitoring systems performance reports. We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents (0.20*16=3.2 facilities) will exceed the emission standard in 40 CFR 60.452 once per 6-month reporting period and be required to write the excess emission report in 40 CFR 60.455(b) twice per year. We have assumed that 5% of respondents (i.e., 0.05*16= 0.8 facilities) use incineration, and that 20% of these 0.8 respondents with incineration (0.20*8=0.16) will exceed their temperature limit during both 6-month periods of each year and be required to prepare semiannual monitoring exceedance report twice per year under 40 CFR 60.455(c). (3.2 respondents + 0.16 respondents =3.36 respondents).

e Totals have been rounded to 3 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.


13


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleICR Package Instructions
Authorrmarshal
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2022-02-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy