DGL REVISED 2022 Rule 19d-3 justification (2022)

DGL REVISED 2022 Rule 19d-3 justification (2022).pdf

Rule 19d-3-Application for Review of Final Disciplinary Sanctions Denials of Membership Participation or Limitations of Access to Services Imposed by Self-Regulatory Organizations (17 CFR 240.19d

OMB: 3235-0204

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
for the Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Submission for
Rule 19d-3; OMB No. 3235-0204
A.

JUSTIFICATION
1.

Necessity of Information Collection

Rule 19d-3 (“Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
prescribes the form and content of applications to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Commission”) for review of final actions by self-regulatory organizations (“SRO”) imposing final
disciplinary sanctions, denials of membership or participation, bars from association with a member
firm, or prohibitions or limitations of access to services offered by the SRO or member thereof.
2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

The Commission uses the information provided in the application filed pursuant to Rule
19d-3 to review final actions taken by SROs including: (1) final disciplinary sanctions; (2) denial
or conditioning of membership or participation; (3) bars from association; and (4) prohibitions or
limitations of access to services offered by a SRO or member thereof.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

Submission of a written application for review is the least burdensome and most effective
means of giving the Commission notice of the applicant’s intent.
4.

Duplication

There is no duplication of this application process to the Commission.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

Rule 19d-3 affects small entities because the universe of potential respondents includes
natural persons and firms that meet the definition of “small entities” found in Rule 0-10 of the
Exchange Act. Most applications involve natural persons or firms that meet the definition of
“small entities.” There are some applications from firms that do not meet the definition of “small
entities,” but these are relatively uncommon.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

The filing of an application is discretionary for the applicants; therefore a less frequent
collection is not available to the Commission.
7.

Inconsistencies with Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

There are no special circumstances. This collection is consistent with the guidelines in 5

CFR 1320.5(d)(2).
8.

Consultations Outside the Agency

The required Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on
this collection of information was published. No public comments were received.
9.

Payment or Gift

There has been no decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents.
10.

Confidentiality

No assurance of confidentiality is provided to applicants.
11.

Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive nature will be required under the collection of information. The
agency has determined that neither a PIA nor SORN are required in connection with the collection of
information.

12.

Burden of Information Collection

We estimate that 32 respondents will file applications pursuant to Rule 19b-3 each year.
Based upon past submissions, we estimate that each application will require approximately 18
hours spent per respondent. Some applicants hire outside counsel, and other applicants draft the
applications themselves. In our experience the number of applicants who represent themselves
varies considerably from year to year. We estimate that approximately 16 applicants would draft
the applications themselves, and therefore incur an hour burden (a total hour burden of 288 hours
per year for these 16 applicants), and that 16 would hire outside counsel, and therefore incur a cost
burden (discussed in Item 13 below).
With respect to the 16 respondents who incur an hourly burden, we estimate that
approximately 4 are firms that may incur internal labor costs of approximately $319, per hour, per

response. 1 Therefore, the internal labor cost of compliance for these respondents is approximately
1

This estimate was calculated using a $319 per hour wage for a Compliance Manager (assuming
the firm has one), based on the Security Industry and Financial Markets Association’s,
Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, which has been modified
2

$22,968 (assuming 4 submissions from firms x 18 hours per response x $319 per hour). We
estimate that the remaining 12 are natural persons who complete the forms themselves, and
therefore we do not estimate an internal labor cost of compliance for these respondents.
Summary of Hourly Burdens (Annual)
Name of
Information
Collection

Type of
Burden

Rule 19d-3
Applications

Reporting

Number of
Entities

Number of
Responses
per Entity

16

1

Burden per
Response

Total Industry
Burden

18

288

TOTAL BURDEN
13.

288

Costs to Respondents

Respondents may incur costs if they hire counsel to prepare their applications. As noted
previously, some applications are submitted by parties who file their applications pro se. However,
some parties may hire counsel and incur related costs. We estimate that 16 respondents may hire
outside counsel. We estimate the total cost for these 16 respondents to be $135,936 per year
(estimate of 16 respondents x 18 hours per response x $472 per hour). 2

Summary of Cost Burdens (Annual)
Name of
Type of
Information Burden

Number of
Number of
Respondents Responses

Cost per
Each

Hours
Per

Total Industry
Burden

(..continued)
by Commission staff to account for an 1,800-hour work year as well as inflation, and multiplied
by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.
2

This estimate was calculated using a $472 per hour wage for an outside Attorney, based on the
Security Industry and Financial Markets Association’s, Management & Professional Earnings in
the Securities Industry 2013, which has been modified by Commission staff to account for an
1,800-hour work year as well as inflation, and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm
size, employee benefits and overhead.
3

Collection

Rule 19d-3
Applications

per
Hour of
Response
Respondent Response
Reporting

16

1

$472

18
TOTAL BURDEN

14.

$135,936
$135,936

Costs to Federal Government

Not Applicable.
15.

Changes in Burden

The hour and cost burdens decreased because the estimated number of respondents
decreased from 40 to 32 overall, the estimated number of respondents drafting applications
themselves decreased from 20 to 16, and the estimated number of respondents hiring outside
counsel to draft applications decreased from 20 to 16. We are decreasing our estimated number of
respondents overall from 40 to 32, based on the periodic reports under Rule 900 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.900. Those reports reflect that, for the periods
between fiscal years 2019 and 2021, the average number of new administrative proceedings
instituted in SRO matters was 31.33 per year. (This figure also includes matters filed pursuant to
Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, matters filed pursuant to Section 105(e) of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and remands from a Court of Appeals, but in our experience the
number of these applications is de minimis compared with applications under Rule 19d-3).

Summary of Change in Hourly Burden (Annual)
Previously
Approved
Burden
360

New Estimated
Burden

288

Change in Burden

-72

Reason for the Change

The estimated number of total respondents
decreased from 40 to 32 and the estimated
number of respondents filing applications
themselves decreased from 20 to 16
TOTAL CHANGE IN

BURDEN

4

-72

Summary of Change in Cost Burden (Annual)
Previously
Approved
Burden
$169,920

New Estimated
Burden

$135,936

Change in Burden

The estimated number of total respondents
decreased from 40 to 32 and the estimated
number of respondents hiring outside
counsel to file applications decreased
from 20 to 16

-$33,984

TOTAL CHANGE IN

BURDEN
16.

Reason for the Change

-$33,984

Information Collections Planned for Statistical Purposes

Not applicable. The information collected is not used for statistical purposes.
17.

Approval to Omit OMB Expiration Date

The Commission is not seeking approval to omit the expiration date.
18.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.
B.

COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHOD
This collection does not involve statistical methods.

5


File Typeapplication/pdf
AuthorROCHEJ
File Modified2022-04-05
File Created2022-04-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy