ombrocisSASPCL2022upportstatement

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submission
Semi-Annual Progress Report for the SASP-Culturally Specific Grant Program
A. Justification
1.

Statutorily-Mandated Need for Information

The Sexual Assault Services Program Grants to Culturally Specific Programs (SASP
Culturally Specific Grant Program), part of the Sexual Assault Services Program (SASP), was
created by the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005
(VAWA 2005), 34 U.S.C. 12511(b), and is the first Federal funding stream solely dedicated to
the provision of direct intervention and related assistance for victims of sexual assault. The
SASP encompasses four different funding streams for States and Territories, tribes, state sexual
assault coalitions, tribal sexual assault coalitions, and culturally specific organizations. Overall,
the purpose of SASP is to provide intervention, advocacy, accompaniment (e.g., accompanying
victims to court, medical facilities, police departments, etc.), support services, and related
assistance for adult, youth, and child victims of sexual assault, family and household members of
victims, and those collaterally affected by the sexual assault.
Survivors of sexual assault from culturally specific communities frequently confront
unique challenges when seeking assistance, such as linguistic and cultural barriers. Sexual
assault advocates report that survivors are more inclined to seek services from organizations that
are familiar with their culture, language, and background and that there is no “one size fits all”
solution to adequately address these critical needs. Culturally specific community-based
organizations are more likely to understand the complex, multi-layered challenges and obstacles
that victims from their communities face when attempting to access services in response to the
sexual assault. In addition, culturally specific community-based organizations have experience
forming relationships and engaging their communities and serve a vital role in providing services
that are relevant for their community.
In order to provide the most appropriate services to such victims, the SASP Culturally
Specific Grant Program targets nonprofit organizations that focus primarily on culturally specific
communities and have experience in the area of sexual assault or who partner with an
organization having such expertise. 34 U.S.C. 12511(c). The goal of the SASP Culturally
Specific Grant Program is to create, maintain, and expand sustainable sexual assault services
provided by culturally specific organizations, which are uniquely situated to respond to the needs
of sexual assault victims within culturally specific populations.
Currently, there are different statutory and regulatory reporting requirements that affect
the SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees. First, VAWA 2000 requires all VAWA
grantees, including SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees, to report on the effectiveness of
their programs to the Attorney General who, in turn, must report to Congress every two years.
Section 1003 of VAWA 2000 states that:
1

(a) REPORT BY GRANT RECIPIENTS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of
Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall require grantees under any
program authorized or reauthorized by this division or an amendment made by
this division to report on the effectiveness of the activities carried out with
amounts made available to carry out that program, including number of persons
served, if applicable, numbers of persons seeking services who could not be
served and such other information as the Attorney General or Secretary may
prescribe.
(b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.- The Attorney General or Secretary of
Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall report biennially to the
Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the
Senate on the grant programs described in subsection (a), including the
information contained in any report under that subsection.
34 U.S.C. 10238.
OVW must also comply with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993
(GPRA) (Pub. L. 103-62) which was enacted to increase Congressional and Administrative focus
on the results from government programs and activities. Information collected on the semiannual progress report regarding performance measures, including output measures, that OVW
has developed for the different types of SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees will enable
OVW to meet its reporting obligations under GPRA.
2.

Use of Information

OVW uses data from the information collection 1 in different ways. OVW uses the
information collected from SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees to monitor their grantfunded activities and qualitatively assess those activities. The SASP Culturally Specific Program
grantees collect information that addresses the following grant-funded activities (different
sections on the reporting form): staff, statutory purpose areas, training, community coordinated
responses, policies, product development, system improvement and victim services. Narrative
questions at the end of these different sections enable grantees to give more detailed qualitative
information about their grant-funded activities. In addition, SASP Culturally Specific Program
grantees must answer narrative questions on the status of the grant goals and objectives, what
services or resources do you provide that are specifically tailored to reach the culturally specific
population, significant areas of remaining need, with regard to improving
1 Under a cooperative agreement between OVW and the University of Southern Maine’s
Muskie School of Public Service, data collected from OVW grantees on all of OVW’s progress
report forms is transmitted to the Muskie School for analysis. For the analysis of the data,
standard descriptive statistics (frequency, sum, percentage, mean, etc.) are used to describe the
characteristics of the grantees and report basic findings. All analyses are conducted in SPSS
13.0.
2

services to victims/survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and
stalking, increasing victim/survivor safety, and enhancing community response (including
offender accountability for both batterers and sex offenders), and what has SASP Culturally
Specific Program funding allowed the grantee to do that it could not do prior to receiving the
funding. There are also optional narrative questions addressing additional information on the
SASP Culturally Specific Program grant and asking grantees to provide qualitative information
regarding the effectiveness of the grant.
In addition to the proposed information collection, OVW will continue to use a number of
other techniques to assess the performance of SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees.
These may include OVW staff attendance at site visits, grant-funded training and technical
assistance events, staff review of products prior to dissemination, and ongoing consultation with
OVW staff.
OVW will aggregate data from all SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees’ progress
reports to assess the performance of the SASP Culturally Specific Program as a whole and to
respond to Congressional, Department of Justice, and other inquiries about how SASP Culturally
Specific Program funds are being used. In addition, information collected from SASP Culturally
Specific Program grantees will support the following OVW measures:
Number of victims receiving requested services;
Percentage of victims requesting services who received them;
Number of protection orders issued;
Number of policies developed/revised;
Number of communities with improved CCR; and
Number of victims requesting services who received them.
Information collected from SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees will enable OVW to
respond to statutory requirements to report on the effectiveness of grant-funded activities. The
structure of the Congressional report on the OVW grant programs (cited in the previous section)
includes sections that describe all OVW grant programs, the Measuring Effectiveness Initiative,
the effectiveness of different interventions that are funded by OVW grant programs, and specific
topics of interest. The Report also contains specific chapters with more detailed information on
each OVW grant program. Much of the data collected helps OVW monitor the grants to ensure
that SASP Culturally Specific Program funds are being used for the purposes authorized by law
and provides important information about the quantity of authorized activities (e.g., number of
trainings, number of victims served, etc.) supported by the funds. OVW primarily relies on two
sources of information to make sure that our grantees are effective. First, OVW collects data
from grantees about what they do with VAWA funding; second, to support our assessment, the
body of existing research evaluating responses to violence against women is examined. Further
discussion about research that has found that the types of interventions supported by SASP
Culturally Specific Program funds are effective is contained in the 2018Biennial Report to
Congress on the Effectiveness of Grant Programs Under the Violence Against Women Act.
OVW has submitted the 2018 Measuring Effectiveness Report to Congress, which includes
information about how funds were expended and an assessment of the effectiveness of funded
3

programs. This report is based on data submitted by grantees reflecting Disability Program
awards made and the Disability Program‐funded activities engaged in from July 1, 2015- June
30, 2017.
The data that OVW collects on the semiannual progress reporting forms is currently not used
in connection with an evaluation of the SASP Culturally Specific Program. OVW is currently
exploring the development of a multi-layered evaluation agenda for its grant programs.
3.

Use of Information Technology

The collection of information will involve the use of automated, electronic, mechanical or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. OVW
grantees are required to submit semi-annual progress reports through the Grants Management
System (GMS).
4.

Duplication of Information Request

There is no other mechanism by which OVW collects information about grant funded
activities number of victims served, victims seeking services who could not be served or persons
trained.
5.

Impact on Small Entities

There is no impact on small entities as the collection of this type of information is
routinely kept by most grantees receiving funds under the SASP Culturally Specific Program.
6.

Consequences to Federal Programs or Policy

Through the VAWA 2000, Congress has mandated that SASP Culturally Specific
Program grantees report to the Attorney General on the effectiveness of their activities funded
under VAWA. If OVW was not able to collect the information necessary to complete these
reports on behalf of the Attorney General, not only would it be failing to meet a statutorily
required reporting mandate, but also the existence of this important and necessary grant program
could be jeopardized.
7.

Special Circumstances

There are no special circumstances as identified in the specific instructions for a
supporting statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.
8.

Federal Register Publication

OVW has consulted with persons outside the agency who have advised that the data
proposed to be collected is available, the annual collection of such data is not burdensome, the
form is clear, and that the information is routinely kept by most grantees receiving funds under
4

the SASP Culturally Specific Program. OVW has solicited public comment on this form in
accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act. A 60 day notice was
published in the Federal Register on May 26, 2022(Federal Register, Volume 87, page 32059)
and a 30-day was notice was published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2022(Federal
Register, Volume 87, page 38186). OVW received comments that expressed concerns about
federal funding for this grant program which did not address the data collection form.
9.

Payment or Gift to Respondents
There will no payment or gift to respondents.

10.

Confidentiality

Although this information is needed for a public report to Congress, it will not involve
any personal information about victims that could identify them as specific individuals.
However, anecdotal, non-identifying information about the effectiveness of individual programs
may be included in the report. There is no assurance to confidentiality.
11.

Specific Questions

The semi-annual progress report will not contain any questions of a personal, sensitive
nature such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are
commonly considered private.
12.

Hour Burden of the Collection of Information

This semi-annual progress report is not overly burdensome. The data collection tool will
be completed by approximately 11 SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees twice a year as
there are 2 reporting periods- January 1 through June 30 and July 1 through December 31. There
will be semi-annual responses and it is estimated that it will take grantees no more than 1 hour to
complete the semi-annual progress report form. Thus, the annual reporting and recordkeeping
hour burden is 22. SASP Culturally Specific Program grantees are informed about the reporting
requirements during the grant solicitation process and during the grant award process. Because
the semi-annual progress report covers a six month period, grantees are not in a position to
complete the form until the end of each reporting period.
13.

Cost Burden of the Collection of Information

OVW does not believe that there is any annual cost burden on respondents or
recordkeepers resulting from the collection of this information.
14.

Annualized Costs to the Federal Government

The annualized costs to the Federal Government resulting from the OVW staff review of
the progress reports submitted by grantees are estimated to be $1232.
5

15.

Program Changes or Adjustments

There are no program changes or adjustments for the estimates identified in Section 13
and in Section 14. This is a information collection that is necessary for OVW and its SASP
Culturally Specific Program grantees to comply with the statutory reporting requirements of 42
U.S.C. 3789 and the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103-62).
16.

Published Results of Information Collections

There will be no complex analytical techniques used in connection with the publication
of
information collected under the request. Information will be gathered twice a year at the end of
the reporting periods, January 1 through June 30 and July 1 through December 31. OVW is
statutorily required to submit a report on the effectiveness of grant-funded activities on an annual
basis.
17.

Display of the Expiration Date of OMB Approval

OVW will display the Expiration Date of OMB Approval in the upper right hand corner
of the semi-annual Progress Report.
18.

Exception to the Certification Statement

OVW is not seeking any exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19,
Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions, of OMB Form 83-I.

6