Supporting Statement Part A v.2 (7-7-22)

Supporting Statement Part A v.2 (7-7-22).docx

Campus Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) Survey

OMB: 1840-0827

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Tracking and OMB Number: 1840-0827

Revised: 07/07/2022

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION


  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. What is the purpose for this information collection? Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Include a citation that authorizes the collection of information. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, list the sections with a brief description of the information collection requirement, and/or changes to sections, if applicable.


The purpose of this submission is to extend the previously approved collection for the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA), found in section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA), as amended. The statute (20 U.S.C. 1092(e)), and its implementing regulations (34 CFR 668.41 and 34 CFR 668.47) require coeducational institutions that participate in the Title IV, HEA federal student aid programs and that have an intercollegiate athletic program to annually prepare a report on athletic participation, staffing, revenue and expenditures by gender, and by men’s and women’s teams. An institution must make the report available to students, potential students, and the public upon request. An institution must also report the data to the Department of Education and the Department makes the information publicly available on its website.




  1. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The information in the EADA report is used by prospective student-athletes to help them choose a postsecondary institution. Prospective and current students and the public also use the information to assess an institution’s commitment to and progress toward gender equity in intercollegiate athletics.




  1. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Please identify systems or websites used to electronically collect this information. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden. If there is an increase or decrease in burden related to using technology (e.g. using an electronic form, system or website from paper), please explain in number 12.


The information collection is conducted via a web-based application (the EADA Survey). Institutions are required to submit their information electronically using the EADA survey. Data submitted online are migrated to the Office of Postsecondary Education’s (OPE’s) public dissemination website at http://ope.ed.gov/athletics for anyone to view. The EADA Survey has been conducted electronically since collection year 2001.

Institutions must also disclose the report to current and prospective students and the public. Institutions are encouraged to use appropriate information technologies to reduce their burden. For instance, in the preamble to the final rules (60 Fed Reg 61426 (1995)), the Department explicitly noted that institutions may opt to make the information available by electronic means.




  1. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


There is some overlap between these requirements and those with which an institution must comply pursuant to its Program Participation Agreement (PPA) in 34 CFR 668.14, but there is no duplication in the data collected. Under those regulations, an institution entering into a PPA with the department must agree that, if the institution is coeducational and has an intercollegiate athletic program, it will comply with the provisions in 34 CFR 668.48.


  1. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.


Given that the reporting burden of 5.5 hours per respondent is relatively low, there are no special methods in place for small businesses or entities at this time.


  1. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

Per statute, the information must be collected and disclosed annually.



  1. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;


  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


This information collection requires no special circumstances.



  1. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.


Include a citation for the 60 day comment period (e.g. Vol. 84 FR ##### and the date of publication). Summarize public comments received in response to the 60 day notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. If only non-substantive comments are provided, please provide a statement to that effect and that it did not relate or warrant any changes to this information collection request. In your comments, please also indicate the number of public comments received.


For the 30 day notice, indicate that a notice will be published.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


ED published the applicable 60 day notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment on the form and the burden assessment. Federal Register /Vol. 87, No. 88 / Friday, May 6, 2022 /Notices. There were no comments received. ED will publish the applicable 30-day notice.


  1. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.


There are no payments or gifts to respondents.


  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.1 If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data. If no PII will be collected, state that no assurance of confidentiality is provided to respondents. If the Paperwork Burden Statement is not included physically on a form, you may include it here. Please ensure that your response per respondent matches the estimate provided in number 12.


The EADA and regulations require an institution to disclose the average salaries of head and assistant coaches of men and women’s teams. There are a very small number of co-ed teams. Requiring institutions to report separate averages for coaches of co-ed teams might effectively require the institution to disclose an individual’s salary. To avoid this, the Department allows institutions to include the average salaries of coaches of co-ed teams as a pro-rated portion of the average salaries of coaches of men’s and women’s teams (60 Fed Reg 61432 (1995)).



  1. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


These requirements contain no questions of a sensitive nature.



  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden for this current information collection request. The statement should:


  • Provide an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. Address changes in burden due to the use of technology (if applicable). Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

  • Please do not include increases in burden and respondents numerically in this table. Explain these changes in number 15.

  • Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable.

  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burden in the table below.

  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. Use this site to research the appropriate wage rate. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14. If there is no cost to respondents, indicate by entering 0 in the chart below and/or provide a statement.


Provide a descriptive narrative here in addition to completing the table below with burden hour estimates.


The number of institutions in the 2020 and 2019 year remained at 2,073. There was a small decrease of 6 respondents from the previous OMB approved number of 2,079 respondents.

There were 2,073 postsecondary educational institutions required to complete the EADA survey based on 2019 and 2020 data. The 2,073 institutions included 1,155 Public, 894 Private Not-for-Profit and 24 Private For Profit postsecondary educational institutions.

We estimate that if would take an institution approximately 5.5 hours to prepare the data and complete the survey. The cost to respondents is based on the estimated response burden (hours) of 5.5 multiplied by $20.00 (in 2020), which was estimated using the median hourly wage for the Office and Administrative Support Occupations as reported in the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics.



Estimated Annual Burden and Respondent Costs Table



Information Activity or IC (with type of respondent)



Sample Size (if applicable)



Respondent Response Rate (if applicable)



Number of Respondents



Number of Responses


Average Burden Hours per Response


Total Annual Burden Hours



Estimated Respondent Average Hourly Wage



Total Annual Costs (hourly wage x total burden hours)








Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (EADA) Survey:

Public Institutions

Web based



1,155

1,155

5.5

6,352.5

$20.00

$127,050

EADA Survey

Private Non Profit Institutions

Web based





894

894

5.5

4,917

$20.00

$98,340

EADA Survey

Private For Profit Institutions

Web based






24

24

5.5

132

$20.00

$2,640

Annualized Totals



2,073

2,073


5.5

11,401.5


$20.00


$228,030


Please ensure the annual total burden, respondents and response match those entered in IC Data Parts 1 and 2, and the response per respondent matches the Paperwork Burden Statement that must be included on all forms.


  1. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)


  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.


  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.


  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12.


Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :

Total Annual Costs (O&M) :____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested :


There are no capital/startup costs or annual O&M costs to respondents


  1. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.



Estimated annual cost to the Federal government:


Salaried Staff    12 hours               $1,000.00   

Contract Costs                 $390,000.00

Estimated total costs to the Federal Government:  $391,000.00



  1. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).


Provide a descriptive narrative for the reasons of any change in addition to completing the table with the burden hour change(s) here.


The total annual burden to respondents remains about the same. The number of institutions in the 2020 and 2019 year remained at 2,073. There was a small decrease of 6 respondents from the previous OMB approved number of 2,079 respondents. This resulted in a decrease in burden or 34 hours. The annual EADA survey population varies each year depending on the number of institutions that meet the criteria for survey eligibility.  The eligible population comes from IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) data.  Decreases are caused by institutions closing, institutions no longer being Title IV eligible, or institutions no longer offering varsity athletics.  New institutions may also enter into the survey population each year, if they meet the eligibility criteria for the first time.



The annual cost to the Federal Government remained the same with no increase in contractor costs.




Program Change Due to New Statute

Program Change Due to Agency Discretion

Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate

Total Burden

0

0

-34

Total Responses

0

0

-6

Total Costs (if applicable)

0

0




  1. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


This information collection is available via the Department’s web site if the public wishes to view the information.



  1. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.



We are not seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval.



  1. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.



1 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)



8

Shape1

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSupporting Statement Part A
AuthorAuthorised User
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2022-07-14

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy