Supporting_Statement_OST_Generic_Clearance_June_2022

Supporting_Statement_OST_Generic_Clearance_June_2022.docx

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

OMB: 2105-0573

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Generic Clearance for Collection of Qualitative

Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

OMB No. 2105-0573


INTRODUCTION: This is to request the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval for Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery. This ICR will allow the Office of Secretary of Transportation (OST) to continue collecting qualitative feedback from customers and stakeholders on its service delivery. OMB approved OST’s request for this generic clearance on 07/14/2016 issuing control number 2105-0573. We are requesting approval of an extension without change due to lack of enough available hours for any new customer feedback surveys. Due to short approval time by OIRA for Fast Track ICRs conducting customer feedback surveys by program offices have become very popular and we have run out of hours for new surveys by other offices. Therefore, we are resubmitting this ICR to request approval for increasing burden hours.



  1. JUSTIFICATION


  1. Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary


Executive Order 12862 directed Federal agencies to provide service to the public that matches or exceeds the best service available in the private sector. In order to work continuously to ensure that our programs are effective and meet our customers’ needs, Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) (hereafter “the Agency”), seeks to obtain an OMB approval of a Fast Track clearance to collect qualitative feedback on our service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study.


This collection of information is necessary to enable the Agency to garner customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with our commitment to improving service delivery. The information collected from our customers and stakeholders will help ensure that users have an effective, efficient, and satisfying experience with the Agency’s programs. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It also allows feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management.


  1. Purpose and Use of the Information Collection


Improving agency programs requires ongoing assessment of service delivery, by which we mean systematic review of the operation of a program compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards, as a means of contributing to the continuous improvement of the program. The Agency will collect, analyze, and interpret information gathered through this generic clearance to identify strengths and weaknesses of current services and make improvements in service delivery based on feedback. The solicitation of feedback will target areas such as: timeliness, appropriateness, accuracy of information, courtesy, efficiency of service delivery, and resolution of issues with service delivery. Responses will be assessed to plan and inform efforts to improve or maintain the quality of service offered to the public. If this information is not collected, vital feedback from customers and stakeholders on the Agency’s services will be unavailable.


The Agency will only submit a collection for approval under this generic clearance if it meets the following conditions:


  • Information gathered will be used only internally for general service improvement and program management purposes and is not intended for release outside of the agency (if released, procedures outlined in Question 16 will be followed);

  • Information gathered will not be used for the purpose of substantially informing influential policy decisions 1;

  • Information gathered will yield qualitative information; the collections will not be designed or expected to yield statistically reliable results or used as though the results are generalizable to the population of study ;

  • The collections are voluntary;

  • The collections are low-burden for respondents (based on considerations of total burden hours, total number of respondents, or burden-hours per respondent) and are low-cost for both the respondents and the Federal Government;

  • The collections are non-controversial and do not raise issues of concern to other Federal agencies;

  • Any collection is targeted to the solicitation of opinions from respondents who have experience with the program or may have experience with the program in the near future; and

  • With the exception of information needed to provide re-numeration for participants of focus groups and cognitive laboratory studies, personally identifiable information (PII) is collected only to the extent necessary and is not retained.


If these conditions are not met, the Agency will submit an information collection request to OMB for approval through the normal PRA process.


To obtain approval for a collection that meets the conditions of this generic clearance, a standardized form will be submitted to OMB along with supporting documentation (e.g., a copy of the comment card). The submission will have automatic approval, unless OMB identifies issues within 5 business days.


The types of collections that this generic clearance covers include, but are not limited to:

  • Customer comment cards/complaint forms

  • Small discussion groups

  • Focus Groups of customers, potential customers, delivery partners, or other stakeholders

  • Cognitive laboratory studies, such as those used to refine questions or assess usability of a website;

  • Qualitative customer satisfaction surveys (e.g., post-transaction surveys; opt-out web surveys)

  • In-person observation testing (e.g., website or software usability tests)

The Agency has established a manager/managing entity to serve for this generic clearance and will conduct an independent review of each information collection to ensure compliance with the terms of this clearance prior to submitting each collection to OMB.


  1. Consideration Given to Information Technology


If appropriate, agencies will collect information electronically and/or use online collaboration tools to reduce burden.


  1. Duplication of Information


No similar data are gathered or maintained by the Agency or are available from other sources known to the Agency.


  1. Reducing the Burden on Small Entities


Small business or other small entities may be involved in these efforts but the Agency will minimize the burden on them of information collections approved under this clearance by sampling, asking for readily available information, and using short, easy-to-complete information collection instruments.


  1. Consequences of Not Conducting Collection


Without these types of feedback, the Agency will not have timely information to adjust its services to meet customer needs.


  1. Special Circumstances


There are no special circumstances. The information collected will be voluntary and will not be used for statistical purposes.


  1. Consultations with Persons Outside the Agency


In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d), on March 28, 2019, a 60-day notice for public comment was published in the Federal Register (84 FR 11866), and a 30-day notice was published on June 5, 2109 (84 FR 26177). No comments were received.



  1. Payment or Gift


The Agency will not provide payment or other forms of remuneration to respondents of its various forms of collecting feedback.


  1. Confidentiality


If a confidentiality pledge is deemed useful and feasible, the Agency will only include a pledge of confidentiality that is supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, and that does not unnecessarily impede sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use. If the agency includes a pledge of confidentiality, it will include a citation for the statute or regulation supporting the pledge.


  1. Sensitive Nature


No questions will be asked that are of a personal or sensitive nature.


  1. Burden of Information Collection


A variety of instruments and platforms will be used to collect information from respondents. The annual burden hours requested (2000 hours) are based on the number of collections we expect to conduct over the requested period for this clearance. It is anticipated that each Program Office within OST will conduct at least one collection of qualitative feedback on OST service delivery each year, estimated to take no more than 15 minutes per respondent. Therefore, based on the estimated number of respondents (80000 each), the total hours equate to 20000 hours per occurrence (80000 respondents x 15 minutes per response = 20000 hours).


It is recognized that a Program Office within OST may choose to conduct more than one collection of qualitative feedback on OST service delivery.


Estimated Annual Reporting Burden


Type of Collection


No. of Respondents


Annual Frequency per Response


Hours per Response


Total Hours

1. Surveys, comment cards, interviews, focus groups, and web-based technologies for Customer Service Satisfaction and Delivery for the Office of the Secretary

50000

Annual, periodically

15 minutes

12500 hours

2. Surveys, comment cards, interviews, focus groups, and web-based technologies for Customer Service Satisfaction and Delivery for the Office of the Senior Procurement Executive

10000

Annual, periodically

15 minutes

2500 hours

3. Surveys, comment cards, interviews, focus groups, and web-based technologies for Customer Service Satisfaction and Delivery for Transit benefits Office

10000

Annual, periodically

15 minutes

2500 hours

4. Surveys, comment cards, interviews, focus groups, and web-based technologies for Customer Service Satisfaction and Delivery for the Office of Financial Management

10000

Annual, periodically

15 minutes

2500 hours

ANNUAL TOTAL (estimated)

80000



20000 hours

Total for 3 years

240000



60000 hours


  1. Costs to Respondents


An average of $150.00 per hour is estimated to cost the respondents. So it is estimated total cost would be 3,000,000.00 per year.


  1. Costs to Federal Government


Costs are dependent upon the type of collection administered, the size of the sample, the number of questions asked, the type and complexity of the questions asked, the frequency of the collection, and whether the collection is conducted by a private firm or OST. OST anticipates that in most cases OST would conduct the surveys and there would be no additional staffing costs.

The anticipated annual cost to the Federal Government is estimated to be approximately $223,750.00 annually.


Cost for using a private firm to administer a customer satisfaction survey is estimated at $300,000.00 - $450,000.00.


  1. Reason for Change


Existence of Fast Track option for conducting surveys has caused a sudden increase in number of surveys. OST has already used the 2000 burden hours previously approved. OST requests increasing the total burden hours to 60,000.


  1. Tabulation of Results, Schedule, Analysis Plans


Feedback collected under this generic clearance provides useful information, but it does not yield data that can be generalized to the overall population. Findings will be used for general service improvement, but are not for publication or other public release.


Although the Agency does not intend to publish its findings, the Agency may receive requests to release the information (e.g., congressional inquiry, Freedom of Information Act requests). The Agency will disseminate the findings when appropriate, strictly following the Agency's "Guidelines for Ensuring the Quality of Information Disseminated to the Public.", and will include specific discussion of the limitation of the qualitative results discussed above.


  1. Display of OMB Approval Date


We are requesting no exemption.


  1. Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions


These activities comply with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.

1 As defined in OMB and agency Information Quality Guidelines, “influential” means that “an agency can reasonably determine that dissemination of the information will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or important private sector decisions.”

7 | Page


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorMar_S
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2022-10-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy