2502-0507 - Supporting Statement A

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

Supporting Statement

2502-0507

AAF Rent Increase Requirements

Pursuant to the Housing Appropriations Act of 1995

A. Justification

1. On September 28, 1994, P.L. 103-327, "Department of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995," was enacted. This Act authorized HUD's spending authority for Fiscal Year 1995. Among the many measures contained in the bill, emphasis was placed on utilizing the mechanism in the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) contract language that permits an analysis on the reasonableness of the Annual Adjustment Factor (AAF) formula as it is applied to each project unit type. Under this law, review of the AAF under the Overall Limitation clause of the HAP contract would apply only to Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation properties where Section 8 rent levels for a unit type presently exceed the published existing housing fair market rents (FMRs). For Section 8 New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation properties where rent levels for a particular unit type do not exceed the existing FMR and for all other Section 8 contract types without regard for current rent level, review under the overall limitation clause of the contract would not occur and the method of rent adjustment would be the appropriately published AAF. The result of the rent reasonableness test assures that contract rents do not exceed comparable market rents for the project area. The type of information being collected includes project name, rents charged, design, location and condition of building, unit equipment/amenities, site equipment, types of utilities, adjustments in rents. No personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected or required.

2. In order to receive a rent increase where rent levels for a specific unit type, in a Section 8 Substantial Rehabilitation or New Construction contract, exceed the existing FMR rent for that specific unit type, the owner must submit form HUD 92273-S8, Estimates of Market Rent by Comparison. This form must be completed by a non‑identity of interest State certified appraiser, for each unit type (e.g. 1 BR, 2 BR, etc.). The HUD 92273-S8 must contain at least three examples of unassisted housing in the same market area for similar age, type and quality which indicate rent levels of similar unassisted housing that are above the published FMRs. No personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected or required.

In cases where rent levels for a specific unit type in a Section 8 New Construction or Substantial Rehabilitation contract do not exceed the existing FMR for that specific unit type, and for all other Section 8 types where rents are adjusted by the AAF, regardless of current rent levels, the owner must submit the number of units in which turnover occurred since the last contract anniversary for each unit type. Based on the results of the Rent Comparability Study (RCS) and turnover rates, contract rents may or may not be adjusted.

3. An original signature is needed on form 92273-S8. Therefore, this document must be printed, completed, and signed. The form 92273-S8 and the Notice H 02-10 (extended notice H 03-14), are available for download online. Form 92273-S8 is not yet automated, pending the development of a Department-wide standard for electronic signatures.

4. No similar information is being collected nor duplicated.

5. This collection will not have a significant ecomonic impact on small businesses or entities.

6. If this information were not collected as required in the Notice, HUD would be in violation of the FY 1995 Appropriations Act, which instructs the Department to review AAF rent adjustment requests under the overall limitation clause of the Housing Assistance Contract. Furthermore, project owners wouldn’t be able to collect correct rent payments.

7. There are no special reporting requirements.

1. No requirement to report with greater frequency

2. No requirement to collect information in fewer than 30 days

3. No requirement to submit more than an original and 2 copies of any document

4. No requirement to retain records more than 3 years

5. No requirement in collection with statistical survey not designed to produce valid and reliable results

6. No requirement to use statistical data classification that has not been reviewed or approved by OMB

7. No requirement that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is supported by authority established in

Statute of regulation

8. No requirement to require respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets or other confidental

information

8. In accordance with 5CFR 1320.8(d), this information collection soliciting public comments was announced in the Federal Register on XXXXXX, Volume XX, No. XXX, Pages XXXXXX. (0) Comment received.

9. No other payments or gifts or annual adjustments are supplied by HUD to the respondents.

10. No personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected nor required for submission of AAF Rent Increase Requirements. An assurance of confidentiality to respondents is non-applicable.

11. The forms do not contain questions of a sensitive nature.

12. Estimated Public Burden:

Information Collection	Number of Respondents	Frequency of Response	Responses Per Annum	Burden Hr. Per Response	Annual Burden Hrs	Hrly. Cost per Response	Total Annual Cost
HUD form 92273-S8	1,080	1	1080	1.5	1,620	$ 39.07	$63,293.40
			1080		1,620		$63,293.40

Figures representing The Number of Respondents and The Number of Responses were provided by the Programming Division. They capture the current populations for the purpose of this submission. The hourly rate is based on a GS 12 step 1 salary of $81,548. The first entry in the table is the total number of respondents that will have to complete either appendix three or appendix four should the property request a rent increase. The total number of responses represented above reflects the actual number of respondents that requested a rent increase in between 09/01/2014 and 08/31/2017. This data was obtained from two of HUD’s subsystems; the Integrated Real Estate Management System (iREMS) and the Tenant Rental Assistance Certification System (TRACS).

13. There are no additional costs to respondents.

14. Estimated Government Burden:

Average time to review a response is 0.50 hour. The hourly rate for review of the response is $39.07 (GS 12, Step 1).

Information Collection	Number of Respondents	Frequency of Response	Responses Per Year	Burden Hours Per Response	Annual Burden Hours	Hourly Cost per Response	Total Annual Cost
HUD form 92273-S8	1,080	1	1080	1.5	1,620	$ 39.07	$63,293.40
TOTALS

15. Reinstatement, with change, of previously approved collection for which approval has expired. The number of responses and respondents remains the same as the last submission.

16. HUD does not plan to publish the results of this collection.

17. HUD is not seeking to not display the expiration date of OMB approval.

18. There are no exceptions to the Certification Statement.

B. Collections if Information Employing Statistical Methods

No statistical methods are used in this collection.