Tracking and OMB Number: 1810-0687
Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. What is the purpose for this information collection? Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Include a citation that authorizes the collection of information. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, list the sections with a brief description of the information collection requirement, and/or changes to sections, if applicable.
The U.S. Department of Education is requesting approval for an extension for the Application for Assistance under Section 7003 of Title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). This application is for a grant program otherwise known as Impact Aid Basic Support Payments. Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) whose enrollments and revenues are adversely impacted by Federal activities use this form to request financial assistance. Regulations for the Impact Aid Program are found at 34 CFR §222.
The statute and regulations for this program require a variety of data from applicants annually to determine eligibility for the grants and the amount of grant payment under the statutory formula. The least burdensome method of collecting this required information is for each applicant to submit these data through a web-based electronic application hosted on the Impact Aid Grant System (IAGS) website.
This application is approved under OMB 1810-0687. The Department of Education is requesting an extension under the same collection number.
Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.
The Impact Aid Program, authorized by Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), provides financial assistance to local educational agencies (LEAs) whose enrollment or revenues are adversely affected by Federal activities.
The statute and implementing regulations (34 CFR Part 222) require information from applicants annually to determine eligibility for and the amount of payments. The least burdensome method of collecting this required information is for each applicant to submit it as part of its annual Impact Aid application through IAGS previously approved under OMB 1810-0687.
Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Please identify systems or websites used to electronically collect this information. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden. If there is an increase or decrease in burden related to using technology (e.g. using an electronic form, system or website from paper), please explain in number 12.
Impact Aid Program Section 7003 applications are prepared and submitted through an electronic application system. E-application offers recurring LEA applicants significant advantages in preparing the application because it pre-populates the e-application with much of the LEA’s identifying information, previous year’s data, and only displays data entry forms that are needed for that particular LEA. The e-application automatically checks for completion of all necessary items and includes arithmetic checks for table subtotals and the application total. This software reduces the number of errors in applications submitted to ED.
The e-application is used only by LEAs to submit their Section 7003 applications, not by the respondents to the majority of LEA applicants. Very few LEAs have the necessary information collection infrastructure receive parent-pupil survey responses electronically. As a result, the percentage of responses collected electronically is less than five percent.
Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
The information requested under these collections is not duplicated in any other data collection, is unique to this program and the particular applicants, and is intended to serve specific purposes mandated by the statute.
If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000.
Small businesses are not impacted by this data collection. Approximately 500 small LEAs complete this application. Program regulations clarify and standardize the reported information to minimize the burden for all applicants. Additionally, LEAs complete the application online through a program that pre-populates data from the LEA’s previous application. This means that the applicant only needs to enter information if it has changed from the prior year.
Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
The statute requires applicants to apply for funds annually and authorizes the payment of funds based upon those annual applications. Without the annual information, the Department would not be able to disburse these funds efficiently and accurately. In addition, some information collected through the application is used to monitor that recipient LEAs are meeting statutory requirements.
Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:
requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;
in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;
requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
This collection is conducted in a manner consistent with the requirements of 5 CFR 1320.5.
As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB.
Include a citation for the 60 day comment period (e.g. Vol. 84 FR ##### and the date of publication). Summarize public comments received in response to the 60 day notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden. If only non-substantive comments are provided, please provide a statement to that effect and that it did not relate or warrant any changes to this information collection request. In your comments, please also indicate the number of public comments received.
For the 30 day notice, indicate that a notice will be published.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
On June 29, 2022, a Federal Register Notice requesting public comment was published (Vol. 87, No. 124, page 38729). One off-topic comment was received during the 60-day comment period that we will not be responding to. The Department is publishing the applicable 30-day Federal Register notice to request public comment.
Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.
The information collection does not require gifts or payments to be made to respondents.
Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.1 If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge about the confidentiality of the data. If no PII will be collected, state that no assurance of confidentiality is provided to respondents. If the Paperwork Burden Statement is not included physically on a form, you may include it here. Please ensure that your response per respondent matches the estimate provided in number 12.
The information collection requires no assurance of confidentiality.
Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
The information collection does not include any questions of a sensitive nature.
Provide estimates of the hour burden for this current information collection request. The statement should:
Provide an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. Address changes in burden due to the use of technology (if applicable). Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.
Please do not include increases in burden and respondents numerically in this table. Explain these changes in number 15.
Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), frequency of response, annual hour burden. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable.
If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burden in the table below.
Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. Use this site to research the appropriate wage rate. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14. If there is no cost to respondents, indicate by entering 0 in the chart below and/or provide a statement.
Provide a descriptive narrative here in addition to completing the table below with burden hour estimates.
As presented in greater detail below, we estimate that it will require 11.72 hours per LEA applicant to collect, organize and prepare the application for Impact Aid Section 7003 assistance. Therefore given that there are 1,079, we estimate a total of 12,645 burden hours. In addition, to complete the application requires the LEA to collect parent responses that will require .25 average hours. Given that we expect a total of 300,000 parent responses, we estimate a total of 75,000 thousand burden hours.
Estimated Annual Burden and Respondent Costs Table
Information Activity or IC (with type of respondent) |
Sample Size (if applicable) |
Respondent Response Rate (if applicable) |
Number of Respondents |
Number of Responses |
Average Burden Hours per Response |
Total Annual Burden Hours |
Estimated Respondent Average Hourly Wage |
Total Annual Costs (hourly wage x total burden hours) |
Parent Respondents |
n/a |
n/a |
300,000 |
300,000 |
.25 hours |
75,000 |
$10 |
$750,000.00 |
LEA Respondents |
n/a |
n/a |
1,079 |
1,079 |
11.72 hours |
12,645 |
$15 |
$137,572.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized Totals |
|
|
301,079 |
301,079 |
|
87,656 |
|
$887,572.50 |
Please ensure the annual total burden, respondents and response match those entered in IC Data Parts 1 and 2, and the response per respondent matches the Paperwork Burden Statement that must be included on all forms.
Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)
The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.
If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.
Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12.
Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :
Total Annual Costs (O&M) :____________________
Total Annualized Costs Requested :
The only costs to respondents are those shown above for staff time for data collection and reporting. There should be no record-keeping costs beyond those covered under customary and usual business practices.
Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
Federal costs associated with this collection of information are generally those normally associated with Department staff conducting program monitoring.
Application Review |
||||||
Applications
|
Time in Review per Application |
Total Hours |
Wage Rate for Personnel2 |
Total Personnel Cost
|
Other Costs |
Total Cost of Review |
1,079 |
25 hours |
26,975 |
$50.80 |
$ 1,370,330 |
0 |
$ 1,370,330 |
Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).
Provide a descriptive narrative for the reasons of any change in addition to completing the table with the burden hour change(s) here.
The program office has not made any changes between this information collection request and the prior year. This application is approved under OMB 1810-0687. The Department of Education is requesting an extension for this collection.
|
Program Change Due to New Statute |
Program Change Due to Agency Discretion |
Change Due to Adjustment in Agency Estimate |
Total Burden |
|
|
|
Total Responses |
|
|
|
Total Costs (if applicable) |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.
The collection of information does not require publication of the information or use of complex analytical techniques.
If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
The OMB approval number will be displayed on the forms.
Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.
There are no proposed exceptions to the certifications.
1 Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 – Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)
2 2018 Pay rate for a GS-12/10 = $50.80
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
File Title | Supporting Statement Part A |
Author | Authorised User |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2022-09-20 |