Request to Change End User, End Use and/or Destination of Hardware

ICR 202207-1405-003

OMB: 1405-0173

Federal Form Document

IC Document Collections
ICR Details
1405-0173 202207-1405-003
Active 202011-1405-004
STATE/AFA
Request to Change End User, End Use and/or Destination of Hardware
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Emergency 07/19/2022
Approved with change 07/19/2022
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/19/2022
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2023 6 Months From Approved 03/31/2025
1,563 0 1,563
1,563 0 1,563
0 0 0

The “Request to Change End-User, End-Use and/or Destination of Hardware” information collection is used to request DDTC approval prior to any sale, transfer, transshipment, or disposal, whether permanent or temporary, of classified or unclassified defense articles to any end-user, end-use or destination other than as stated on a license or other approval.
The Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) is launching a pilot program pursuant to its authorities under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and its implementing International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), specifically section 126.9(b), in order to assess the concept of an Open General License (OGL) mechanism by which it may authorize certain transfers of defense articles to predetermined parties. OGLs would eliminate the need for the Department to review and approve certain lower-risk transactions involving certain known recipients on a case-by-case basis. DDTC designed the OGL pilot program chiefly to support the efforts of Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom to maintain, repair, and store defense articles in their existing inventories. These allies were chosen because of the unique measures in place in these countries to protect U.S-origin defense articles. During the development of the OGL pilot program, Russia launched an unanticipated full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Due to Ukraine’s robust response, the war has continued for some time. Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom responded, and continue to respond, by providing substantial quantities of arms collectively valued at hundreds of millions of dollars to Ukraine for its self-defense. As detailed in open press reports, arms transferred to Ukraine are sometimes returned to the donating country for repair or maintenance purposes. Given the dramatic uncertainty regarding the future of the situation in Ukraine, it is impossible to anticipate the full scope of our Allies’ future arms transfers to Ukraine or the impact that those transfers will have on our Allies’ ability to defend themselves. Open press reports indicate that transfers to Ukraine may necessitate careful attention to ensure that supplying partners retain adequate stocks for their own self-defense. Since individual export authorizations add to the time needed to conduct maintenance and support activities, the need to implement ways to streamline maintenance and support activities is more pressing than ever. More fluid and responsible licensing mechanisms would reduce public harms by supporting Ukraine’s self-defense efforts, better ensuring our Allies’ supply and sustainment of their own defensive weapons, and maintaining the operability of transferring partners’ retained stocks. Regulating the export, including the reexport and retransfer, of defense articles for foreign policy and national security reasons is DDTC’s statutory mission, satisfying 5 C.F.R. § 1320.13(a)(1)(ii) of the emergency processing requirements. Accordingly, the recordkeeping collection of information in the OGLs, designed to mirror existing requirements that would accompany a submission for authorization to reexport or retransfer, is essential prior to the time period normally associated with a routine submission for review under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), satisfying 5 C.F.R. § 1320.13(a)(1)(i) of the emergency processing requirements. Information collection burdens on the public have been minimized by parallel recordkeeping requirements. And DDTC intends to submit a routine (PRA) submission in short order. In the meantime, in response to Russia’s unanticipated prolonged war of aggression, this emergency processing request will reduce public harms by having the OGLs provide critical time-saving benefits and better support the supply and sustainment of our Allies’ defensive capabilities, satisfying 5 C.F.R. § 1320.13(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of the emergency processing requirements.

US Code: 22 USC 2778 Name of Law: Control of arms exports and imports
   EO: EO 13637 Name/Subject of EO: Administration of Reformed Export Controls
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Request to Change End User, End Use and/or Destination of Hardware DS-6004 Request ti Change End User/End-Use and/or Destination of Hardware

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,563 1,563 0 0 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,563 1,563 0 0 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
No
No

$116,353
No
    No
    No
No
No
No
No
Andrea Battista 202 663-3136

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/19/2022


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy