Supporting Statement A_SHGQ_07.15.2020

Goal of the study: The goal of the Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire (SHGQ) is to define a core set of data elements to be used for hypothesis generation as part of investigations of clusters or outbreaks of shigellosis.
Intended use of the resulting data: The SHGQ will be used by federal, state, and local public health officials responsible for conducting interviews with reported cases of shigellosis in their jurisdiction in order to systematically assess core exposure elements and risk factors among cases of shigellosis. Collected data will be used by CDC staff to inform shigellosis outbreak and cluster prevention and control strategies.
Methods to be used to collect: The SHGQ data elements and form were designed for administration via telephone interviews.
Respondent population: Individuals ill with shigellosis, or their designated proxy, who are part of a shigellosis cluster or outbreak.
How data will be analyzed: Primarily univariate analyses of exposures, risk factors, and demographic characteristics among case patients interviewed as part of outbreak and cluster investigations of shigellosis. Statistical software like SAS and R will be used for analyses.

Circumstances Making the Collection of Information Necessary

This is a new Information Collection Request. We are requesting approval for a period of 3 years.

The Waterborne Disease Prevention Branch (WDPB) in the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED) works to prevent domestic and global water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) related disease. WDPB is comprised of four teams, including the Domestic WASH Epidemiology Team, which focuses on the prevention and control of waterborne and WASH-related disease and outbreaks in the United States. One of the diseases included in the team’s work is shigellosis, an acute diarrheal disease caused by infection with Shigella bacteria.

The Shigella Prevention and Control (SPC) Program is a sub-unit within the Domestic WASH Epidemiology Team which focuses on the prevention and control of shigellosis in the United States. The SPC Program’s current scope of work includes leading cluster and outbreak investigations, partnership development, training and capacity building, research and evaluation, health promotion and communication, and policy consultation and development. The SPC Program also collaborates with other groups in DFWED and in other centers that engage in Shigella related activities. This includes, but is not limited to, the Enteric Disease Epidemiology Branch, Enteric Diseases Laboratory Branch, and the Outbreak Response and Prevention Branch.

Shigella are a family of bacteria that cause the diarrheal disease shigellosis [1]. It is estimated that Shigella causes about 500,000 cases of diarrhea in the United States annually [2]. Shigella bacteria are spread through the fecal-oral route [1]. This can occur when hands can become contaminated with the feces of someone sick with shigellosis, contaminated food or water are ingested, or if contaminated objects come into contact with one’s mouth. Shigella have a low infectious dose [3], and as a result person-to-person transmission of Shigella bacteria is common. Sexual person-to-person contact has also been identified as a mode of transmission for shigellosis [4]. Shigella bacteria have also been reported to survive on a range of surfaces, therefore there is potential for transmission through contaminated fomites [5-7]. Strategies to prevent becoming sick with shigellosis include washing hands, following safe food and water behaviors when travelling, avoiding swallowing water when swimming, and following safe sex behaviors to avoid contact with feces during sex [8]. To prevent secondary transmission of shigellosis among individuals who are sick, prevention behaviors include washing hands, avoiding cooking for others when sick, avoiding swimming until fully recovered, and avoiding sex until fully recovered [8].

From 2007 through 2017, there have been 1,046 outbreaks of shigellosis in the United States, with most of these outbreaks attributed to person to person spread [9]. Outbreaks of shigellosis have been reported in a range of settings such as community-wide [10-13], daycares [11, 14-24], schools [11, 25, 26], cruise ships [27], airplanes [28, 29], mass gatherings [30, 31], and retirement homes [32]. Outbreaks of shigellosis have impacted a range of populations such as children [11, 14-23], men who have sex with men [33-48], people experiencing homelessness [49], tight knit religious communities [13, 22, 50, 51], older adults [32], and refugees/displaced persons [52-54]. Finally, outbreaks of shigellosis have been attributed to a range of transmission modes including person-to-person/no common source [12, 14, 16, 17, 23-25, 31], sexual person-to-person contact [33-48], contaminated food [55-63], and contaminated water [64-69].

As part of Shigella outbreak investigations, it is common for state and local health departments to conduct interviews with cases and contacts to identify how individuals became sick with shigellosis, to identify individuals who could have come into contact with an individual sick with shigellosis, and to identify strategies to control the cluster or outbreak. As person-to-person contact is the most common mode of transmission for shigellosis, and shigellosis is highly contagious, it can be challenging to identify how individuals could have become ill. As a result, comprehensive hypothesis generating questionnaires focused on a range of settings, activities, and potential modes of transmission are needed to guide prevention and control activities.

The SPC Program, in collaboration with other branches in DFWED, is responsible for leading investigations of multistate clusters and outbreaks of shigellosis, and for providing technical assistance for single state clusters and outbreaks upon request by local jurisdictions. To improve the SPC Program’s ability to investigate, respond to, and control clusters and outbreaks of shigellosis, there is a need for the SPC Program to be able to collect case interview data in a systematic way when clusters or outbreaks are identified. State and local health department staff have also requested, that the SPC Program have a systematic data collection tool for shigellosis case interviews that local jurisdictions could use as part of their investigations [70].

The primary audiences for this project are (1) state and local public health partners (foodborne epidemiologists, public health nurses, and other interviewers) and (2) the CDC. The maintenance of the data collection instrument and the associated data will be coordinated by the Shigella Prevention and Control Program in the Waterborne Disease Prevention Branch in the Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases at CDC.

Authorizing Legislation comes from Section 301 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 241) (Attachment A).

Purpose and Use of Information Collection

To meet the needs of the SPC Program, and the needs of local officials, the Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire (SHGQ) was developed. This questionnaire includes a set of data elements that can be used as part of Shigella cluster and outbreak investigations to generate hypotheses about the source(s) of infection, to characterize the cluster or outbreak, and to identify strategies to control the cluster or outbreak. The SHGQ will also be used as part of single state cluster or outbreak investigations when these investigations are requested by state and local health department partners.

Administration of the SHGQ is for hypothesis generating purposes as part of cluster and outbreak investigation activities. There are no research questions addressed. Standardized data will be compiled on recent exposures related to shigellosis in the context of a cluster or outbreak. Data will be used to inform cluster and outbreak control activities. Staff in the SPC Program in WDPB will oversee data collection, data management, analyses and dissemination of information collected with the SHGQ during cluster or outbreak investigations. The data collected from the SHGQ will be used to inform cluster or outbreak control strategies and recommendations.

Administration of the SHGQ is for hypothesis generating purposes as part of cluster and outbreak investigation activities conducted by the SPC Program in WDPB. There are no research questions addressed. The data collected from the SHGQ will be used to inform cluster or outbreak control strategies and recommendations. Aggregated summaries of SHGQ findings to describe outbreak and cluster investigations will be shared as part of cluster and outbreak investigation communications, including state calls and internal CDC meetings. Additionally, aggregated summaries of SHGQ findings may be shared externally through conference presentations and peer-reviewed journal articles to describe cluster and cluster investigation activities and control strategies. Staff in the SPC Program in WDPB will oversee data analyses and dissemination of information collected with the SHGQ during cluster or outbreak investigations.

Use of Improved Information Technology and Burden Reduction

The SHGQ data elements and form were designed for administration via telephone interview with cases of shigellosis or their proxies. This method was chosen to reduce the overall burden on respondents because it allows for the assessment team to ask for clarification from participants during the interview, and this limits the need for additional follow-up. The data collection instrument was designed to collect the minimum information necessary for the purposes of this project.

Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information

There is currently no national, standardized hypothesis generating interview data collection instrument for use during single or multistate shigellosis cluster or outbreak investigations. The information that will be gathered through the SHGQ is not available from other data sources or through other means. Prior to developing the SHGQ and this data collection activity, WDPB staff in SPC Program consulted with both internal and external stakeholders to confirm that this effort is not duplicative.

Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities

No small businesses will be involved in this data collection

Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently

Lack of comprehensive data about cases of shigellosis will slow down the outbreak and cluster investigation process.

Special Circumstances Relating to the Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5

This request is consistent with the general information collection guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2). No special circumstances apply.

Comments in Response to the Federal Register Notice and Efforts to Consult Outside the Agency

A. A 60-day Federal Register Notice was published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2020, vol. 85, No. 37, p. 10692 (Attachment B). CDC received two anonymous non-substantive public comments related to this notice.

B. No consultations outside of CDC occurred including with local health department partners

Explanation of Any Payment or Gift to Respondents

There will be no remuneration to respondents.

Protection of the Privacy and Confidentiality of Information Provided by Respondents

The Privacy Act does not apply to this data collection. No individually identifiable information is being collected.

Individuals and organizations will be assured of the privacy of their replies under Section 934(c) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 USC 299c-3(c). They will be told the purposes for which the information is collected and that, in accordance with this statute, any identifiable information about them will not be used or disclosed for any other purpose without their prior consent, unless required by law upon the demand of a court or other governmental authority.

SHGQ data will be securely shared with CDC by local officials, and data shared with CDC will be stored in a limited access folder and in a password protected database. Following data entry, the original SHGQ form will be destroyed. Before data entry, the original SHGQ will be kept in a locked file cabinet or in a folder on the limited access CDC drive.

The SHGQ data elements and SHGQ data collection tool will ascertain information from respondents about exposures (e.g., food, water, person to person contact, travel) preceding onset of shigellosis, known risk factors for shigellosis (e.g., race/ethnicity, poverty, homelessness, crowding), and clinical characteristics of case patient illness (e.g., symptoms, duration of illness, medications). It will not collect any information that could be used to identify individual case patients. Local or State public health officials with jurisdictional responsibility will maintain the respondent’s name, telephone number, and other personally identifiable information. This information will be not be included in the data collection tool and no identifying information will be transmitted to CDC.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Justification for Sensitive Questions

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

It has been determined that IRB review is not required for this data collection (Attachment D).

Justification for Sensitive Questions

Shigella bacteria can be spread in multiple ways. This includes through contaminated food and water, and via sexual and non-sexual person-to-person contact. To determine if cases became ill via sexual person-to-person contact, case patients will be asked questions about sexual activity and behavior, sexual partners, drug and alcohol use during sexual activity, and previous diagnosis with a sexually transmitted infection. To inform prevention and control efforts, questions about sexual orientation and gender identity will also be asked to characterize the demographics of case patients. As part of this module, case patients are given an explanation for why the sensitive questions are asked and are provided the option to opt out of answering these questions.

In addition to sexual health related questions, other potentially sensitive questions are asked of case patients. This includes questions related to insecure housing, homelessness, and family income. These questions are asked because people experiencing homelessness have been identified as a risk population, and poverty has been identified as a risk factor for Shigella infection.

All questions in the SHGQ are optional, and case patients can choose to answer the questions they feel comfortable responding to.

Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Costs

Interviews will be conducted with case patients who are part of a cluster or outbreak of shigellosis. Based on the estimated number of cases of shigellosis in the U.S. and the proportion of those cases that are cluster or outbreak associated, it is estimated that the SHGQ would be administered to approximately 1500 individual respondents across all jurisdictions each year. The estimate for burden hours is based on a pilot test of the data collection instrument by 2 public health professionals. In the pilot test, the average time to complete the instrument including time for reviewing instructions, gathering needed information and completing the instrument, was approximately 45 minutes (range: 30 to 60 minutes). For the purposes of estimating burden hours, the average time to complete the instrument was used. This new data collection will use qualitative methods, including telephone interviews guided by semi-structured protocols designed to elicit core elements exposures from respondents. Interviewers will be able to probe further or deviate from protocols to the extent that respondents reveal new information. There are no specific research questions addressed.

Exhibit 1: Estimated Annual Burden Hours

Type of Respondent	Form Name	No. of Respondents	No. Responses per Respondent	Avg. Burden per response (in hrs.)	Total Burden (in hrs.)
Shigellosis case patients identified as part of outbreak or cluster investigations	Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire	1500	1	45/60	1,125 hours
Total					1,125 hours

Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annual cost burden associated with individual’s time to participate. We used the 2018 mean average hourly wage for all occupations in the United States. This wage of $24.98 was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm). Burden in hours is taken from Exhibit 1. The total annual cost burden is calculated by multiplying the mean hourly wage by the burden in hours. The total cost burden is estimated to be $28,102.50.

Exhibit 2. Estimated Annual Burden Costs

Type of Respondent	Form Name	Total Burden Hours	Hourly Wage Rate	Total Respondent Costs
All occupations in the United States	Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire	1,125 hours	$24.98	$28,102.50
Total				$28,102.50

Estimates of Other Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Record Keepers

There are no direct costs to respondents other than their time to participate in this study.

Annualized Cost to the Government

The estimated total cost to the Federal Government for this project is $14,176 annually. Exhibit 3 provides a breakdown of the estimated total costs.

Staff (FTE)	Average Hours per Collection	Average Hourly Rate	Total Average Cost
Behavioral Scientist – (GS-13, equivalent); Project development and project management, data analysis, publication and dissemination of results	100	$47.68	$4,768
Epidemiologist – (GS-11, equivalent); Project development and project management, data analysis, publication and dissemination of results	300	$31.36	$9,408
Estimated Total Cost of Information Collection			$14,176

Explanation for Program Changes or Adjustments

This is a new information collection.

Plans for Tabulation and Publication and Project Time Schedule

Project Time Schedule
Activity	Time Schedule
Utilize the SHGQ to conduct interviews during cluster and outbreak investigations	Months 1-36
Ongoing data analysis	Months 1-36

The analysis plan for data collected using the SHGQ is to conduct primarily univariate analyses of exposures, risk factors, and demographic characteristics among case patients interviewed as part of outbreak and cluster investigations of shigellosis. Statistical software like SAS and R will be used for analyses. All data collected and databases will be housed on a secure drive on the CDC network that is only accessible to the project members.

Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date is Inappropriate

None.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

There are no exceptions to the certification.

Attachments

Section 301 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 241)
60-Day Federal Register Notice
Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire (SHGQ) - English
Determination of Non-Applicability of Human Subjects Regulations
Shigella Hypothesis Generating Questionnaire (SHGQ) – Spanish

References

1. Keusch, G.T., Shigellosis, in Bacterial Infections of Humans, B. P. and E. Abrutyn, Editors. 2009, Springer: Boston, MA. p. 699-724.

2. Scallan, E., et al., Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis, 2011. 17(1): p. 7-15.

3. DuPont, H.L., et al., Inoculum size in shigellosis and implications for expected mode of transmission. J Infect Dis, 1989. 159(6): p. 1126-8.

4. Aragon, T.J., et al., Case-control study of shigellosis in San Francisco: The role of sexual transmission and HIV infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2007. 44(3): p. 327-334.

5. Nakamura, M., The survival of Shigella sonnei on cotton, glass, wood, paper, and metal at various temperatures. J Hyg (Lond), 1962. 60: p. 35-9.

6. Islam, M.S., et al., Survival of Shigella dysenteriae type 1 on fomites. J Health Popul Nutr, 2001. 19(3): p. 177-82.

7. Kramer, A., I. Schwebke, and G. Kampf, How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis, 2006. 6: p. 130.

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Questions & Answers. 2017 [cited 2019 September 23]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/shigella/general-information.html.

9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Outbreak Reporting System (NORS). 2019 [cited 2019 April 8]; Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/norsdashboard/.

10. McKee Jr, K.T., et al., Application of a geographic information system to the tracking and control of an outbreak of shigellosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2000. 31(3): p. 728-733.

11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Day care-related outbreaks of rhamnose-negative Shigella sonnei--six states, June 2001-March 2003. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2004. 53(3): p. 60-3.

12. Mahoney, F.J., et al., Evaluation of an intervention program in the control of an urban outbreak of shigellosis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1991. 7(5): p. 292-297.

13. Sobel, J., et al., A prolonged outbreak of Shigella sonnei infections in traditionally observant Jewish communities in North America caused by a molecularly distinct bacterial subtype. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998. 177(5): p. 1405-1409.

14. Mohle-Boetani, J.C., et al., Communitywide shigellosis: Control of an outbreak and risk factors in child day-care centers. American Journal of Public Health, 1995. 85(6): p. 812-816.

15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Shigella sonnei gastroenteritis associated with day care centers--Kansas, Kentucky, and Missouri, 2005. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2006. 55(39): p. 1068-1071.

16. Arvelo, W., et al., Transmission risk factors and treatment of pediatric shigellosis during a large daycare center-associated outbreak of multidrug resistant Shigella sonnei: Implications for the management of shigellosis outbreaks among children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2009. 28(11): p. 976-980.

17. Shane, A.L., et al., Sharing Shigella: Risk factors for a multicommunity outbreak of shigellosis. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 2003. 157(6): p. 601-603.

18. Gehlbach, S.H., et al., Spread of disease by fecal-oral route in day nurseries. Health Services Report, 1973. 88(4): p. 320-322.

19. An epidemic of shigellosis in a day-care centre in Quebec. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1985. 132(4): p. 399-400.

20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigellosis in child day care centers--Lexington-Fayette County, Kentucky, 1991. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 1992. 41(25): p. 440-442.

21. Genobile, D., et al., An outbreak of shigellosis in a child care centre. Communicable Diseases Intelligence Quarterly Report, 2004. 28(2): p. 225-229.

22. Pilon, P.A., B. Camara, and S. Bekal, Outbreak of Shigella sonnei in Montreal's ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, 2015. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 2016. 42(4): p. 89-95.

23. Hoffman, R.E. and P.J. Shillam, The use of hygiene, cohorting, and antimicrobial therapy to control an outbreak of shigellosis. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 1990. 144(2): p. 219-221.

24. Artieda, J., et al., Brote de Shigella sonnei en un centro escolar de Gipuzkoa. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, 2015. 33(3): p. 145-148.

25. Schulte, J.M., et al., How we didn't clean up until we washed our hands: Shigellosis in an elementary and middle school in North Texas. Southern Medical Journal, 2012. 105(1): p. 1-4.

26. Chen, K.T., C.J. Chen, and J.P. Chiu, A school waterborne outbreak involving both Shigella sonnei and Entamoeba histolytica. Journal of Environmental Health, 2001. 64(4): p. 9-13, 26.

27. Lew, J.F., et al., An outbreak of shigellosis aboard a cruise ship caused by a multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain of Shigella flexneri. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1991. 134(4): p. 413-420.

28. Gaynor, K., et al., International foodborne outbreak of Shigella sonnei infection in airline passengers. Epidemiology & Infection, 2009. 137(3): p. 335-341.

29. Hedberg, C.W., et al., An international foodborne outbreak of shigellosis associated with a commercial airline. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992. 268(22): p. 3208-3212.

30. Lee, L., et al., An outbreak of shigellosis at an outdoor music festival. American Journal of Epidemiology 1991. 133(6): p. 608–615.

31. Wharton, M., et al., A large outbreak of antibiotic-resistant shigellosis at a mass gathering. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990. 162(6): p. 1324-1328.

32. Strysko, J., et al., Notes from the field: Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Shigella sonnei infections in a retirement community - Vermont, October-November 2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2019. 68(17): p. 405-406.

33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigella sonnei outbreak among men who have sex with men--San Francisco, California, 2000-2001. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2001. 50(42): p. 922-926.

34. Marcus, U., et al., Shigellosis—a re-emerging sexually transmitted infection: Outbreak in men having sex with men in Berlin. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2004. 15: p. 533-537.

35. Outbreak of Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei enterocolitis in men who have sex with men, Quebec, 1999 to 2001. Canada Communicable Disease Report 2005. 31(8): p. 85-90.

36. Morgan, O., et al., Shigella sonnei outbreak among homosexual men, London. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2006. 12(9): p. 1458-1460.

37. Rowe, S., et al., An outbreak of shigellosis among men who have sex with men, Victoria, 2008. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin, 2010. 13(4): p. 125-127.

38. Borg, M.L., et al., Ongoing outbreak of Shigella flexneri serotype 3a in men who have sex with men in England and Wales, data from 2009–2011. Eurosurveillance, 2012. 17(13): p. 1-5.

39. Okame, M., et al., Shigella sonnei outbreak among men who have sex with men in Tokyo. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2012. 65(3): p. 277-278.

40. Danila, R.N., et al., Two concurrent enteric disease outbreaks among men who have sex with men, Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2014. 59(7): p. 987-9.

41. Valcanis, M., et al., Outbreak of locally acquired azithromycin-resistant Shigella flexneri infection in men who have sex with men. Pathology, 2015. 47(1): p. 87-88.

42. Hines, J.Z., et al., Shigellosis outbreak among men who have sex with men and homeless persons — Oregon, 2015-2016. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2016. 65(31): p. 812-813.

43. Wu, H.H., et al., Shigellosis outbreak among MSM living with HIV: A case-control study in Taiwan, 2015-2016. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2019. 95(1): p. 67-70.

44. Gaudreau, C., et al., Ciprofloxacin-resistant Shigella sonnei among men who have sex with men, Canada, 2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2011. 17(9): p. 1747-1750.

45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shigella flexneri serotype 3 infections among men who have sex with men--Chicago, Illinois, 2003-2004. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2005. 54(33): p. 820-822.

46. O'Sullivan, B., et al., Shigellosis linked to sex venues, Australia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2002. 8(8): p. 862-864.

47. Strauss, B., et al., Clusters of Shigella sonnei in men who have sex with men, British Columbia, 2001. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 2001. 27(13): p. 109-114.

48. Bowen, A., et al., Outbreaks of Shigella sonnei infection with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin among men who have sex with men — Chicago and metropolitan minneapolis-St. Paul, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2015. 64(21): p. 597-598.

49. Hines, J.Z., et al., Shigellosis outbreak among men who have sex with men and Homeless Persons — Oregon, 2015-2016. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 2016. 65(31): p. 812-813.

50. De Schrijver, K., et al., Outbreak of Shigella sonnei infections in the Orthodox Jewish community of Antwerp, Belgium, April to August 2008. Eurosurveillance, 2011. 16(14): p. pii=19838.

51. Garrett, V., et al., A recurring outbreak of Shigella sonnei among traditionally observant Jewish children in New York City: The risks of daycare and household transmission. Epidemiology and Infection, 2006. 134(6): p. 1231-1236.

52. Benny, E., et al., A large outbreak of shigellosis commencing in an internally displaced population, Papua New Guinea, 2013. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal, 2014. 5(3): p. 18-21.

53. Georgakopoulou, T., et al., Resistant Shigella strains in refugees, August-October 2015, Greece. Epidemiology & Infection, 2016. 144(11): p. 2415-2419.

54. Lederer, I., et al., Shigellosis in refugees, Austria, July to November 2015. Eurosurveillance, 2015. 20(48): p. 30081.

55. Davis, H., et al., A shigellosis outbreak traced to commercially distributed lettuce. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1989. 128(6): p. 1312-1321.

56. Gessner, B.D. and M. Beller, Moose soup shigellosis in Alaska. West J Med, 1994. 160(5): p. 430-3.

57. Kapperud, G., et al., Outbreak of Shigella sonnei infection traced to imported iceberg lettuce. J Clin Microbiol, 1995. 33(3): p. 609-14.

58. Kimura, A.C., et al., Multistate shigellosis outbreak and commercially prepared food, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2004. 10(6): p. 1147-1149.

59. Lewis, H.C., et al., Outbreaks of shigellosis in Denmark and Australia associated with imported baby corn, August 2007 – final summary. Euro Surveillance, 2007. 12(40).

60. Martin, D.L., et al., Contaminated produce--a common source for two outbreaks of Shigella gastroenteritis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1986. 124(2): p. 299-305.

61. Nandy, S., et al., Foodborne-associated Shigella sonnei, India, 2009 and 2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011. 17(11): p. 2072-2074.

62. Nygren, B.L., et al., Foodborne outbreaks of shigellosis in the USA, 1998–2008. Epidemiology and Infection, 2012. 141(2): p. 233-241.

63. Reeve, G., et al., An outbreak of shigellosis associated with the consumption of raw oysters. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989. 321(4): p. 224-227.

64. Blostein, J., Shigellosis from swimming in a park pond in Michigan. Public Health Reports, 1991. 106(3): p. 317-322.

65. Fleming, C.A., et al., An outbreak of Shigella sonnei associated with a recreational spray fountain. American Journal of Public Health, 2000. 90(10): p. 1641-1642.

66. Iwamoto, M., et al., Shigellosis among swimmers in a freshwater lake. Southern Medical Journal, 2005. 98(8): p. 774-778.

67. Keene, W.E., et al., A swimming associated outbreak of hemmorhagic colitis caused by E coli 0157 and Shigella sonnei. New England Journal of Medicine, 1994. 331: p. 579-584.

68. Makintubee, S., J. Mallonee, and G.R. Istre, Shigellosis outbreak associated with swimming. American Journal of Public Health, 1987. 77(2): p. 166-168.

69. Sorvillo, F.J., et al., Shigellosis associated with recreational water contact in Los Angeles County. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1988. 38(3): p. 613-617.

70. Caruso, E., et al. Shigellosis prevention and control efforts: A needs assessment of state and local health departments in 2019 CSTE Annual Conference. 2019. Raleigh, North Carolina.

File Type	application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Author	Samuel, Lee (CDC/OID/NCEZID)
File Modified	0000-00-00
File Created	2022-09-11

Supporting Statement A_SHGQ_07.15.2020